Spin-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy

Similar documents
High Resolution Photoemission Study of the Spin-Dependent Band Structure of Permalloy and Ni

Spin-polarized e,2e) spectroscopy of ferromagnetic iron

Photoemission Spectroscopy

The photoelectric effect

Energy Spectroscopy. Excitation by means of a probe

Ma5: Auger- and Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy

Energy Spectroscopy. Ex.: Fe/MgO

structure and paramagnetic character R. Kakavandi, S-A. Savu, A. Caneschi, T. Chassé, M. B. Casu Electronic Supporting Information

Energy analyzer for spin polarized Auger electron spectroscopy

arxiv: v1 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci] 12 Oct 2007

Studying Metal to Insulator Transitions in Solids using Synchrotron Radiation-based Spectroscopies.

5) Surface photoelectron spectroscopy. For MChem, Spring, Dr. Qiao Chen (room 3R506) University of Sussex.

Spin- and angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy study of the Au(1 1 1) Shockley surface state

The Use of Synchrotron Radiation in Modern Research

Magnetism of TbPc 2 SMMs on ferromagnetic electrodes used in organic spintronics

Introduction to X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) XPS which makes use of the photoelectric effect, was developed in the mid-1960

M2 TP. Low-Energy Electron Diffraction (LEED)

Methods of surface analysis

Advanced Lab Course. X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 BASICS 1 3 EXPERIMENT Qualitative analysis Chemical Shifts 7

Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Systems, Tanaka-Ohya lab.

Photoelectron Interference Pattern (PEIP): A Two-particle Bragg-reflection Demonstration

Probing Matter: Diffraction, Spectroscopy and Photoemission

In order to determine the energy level alignment of the interface between cobalt and

Spectroscopies for Unoccupied States = Electrons

Multi-technique photoelectron spectrometer for micro-area spectroscopy and imaging

arxiv: v1 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci] 24 Apr 2008

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Set-up for ultrafast time-resolved x-ray diffraction using a femtosecond laser-plasma kev x-ray-source

X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) Prof. Paul K. Chu

hν' Φ e - Gamma spectroscopy - Prelab questions 1. What characteristics distinguish x-rays from gamma rays? Is either more intrinsically dangerous?

Making the Invisible Visible: Probing Antiferromagnetic Order in Novel Materials

Supplementary Figure 1 PtLuSb RHEED and sample structure before and after capping layer

Microscopical and Microanalytical Methods (NANO3)

X-ray spectroscopy: Experimental studies of Moseley s law (K-line x-ray fluorescence) and x-ray material s composition determination

Soft X-ray Physics DELNOR-WIGGINS PASS STATE PARK

PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY (PES)

Lecture 5. X-ray Photoemission Spectroscopy (XPS)

Spin pumping in Ferromagnet-Topological Insulator-Ferromagnet Heterostructures Supplementary Information.

X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)

X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)

AMOR the time-of-flight neutron reflectometer at SINQ/PSI

Auger Electron Spectroscopy

STM spectroscopy (STS)

Spectroscopy of Nanostructures. Angle-resolved Photoemission (ARPES, UPS)

Supporting Information s for

Electronics Supplementary Information for. Manab Kundu, Cheuk Chi Albert Ng, Dmitri Y. Petrovykh and Lifeng Liu*

XPS/UPS and EFM. Brent Gila. XPS/UPS Ryan Davies EFM Andy Gerger

Instructions for the advanced lab course Angle-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy

Name: (a) What core levels are responsible for the three photoelectron peaks in Fig. 1?

Auger Electron Spectroscopy (AES)

Surface Sensitivity & Surface Specificity

Photoelectron spectroscopy Instrumentation. Nanomaterials characterization 2

Spectro-microscopic photoemission evidence of surface dissociation and charge uncompensated areas in Pb(Zr,Ti)O 3 (001) layers

PHI 5000 Versaprobe-II Focus X-ray Photo-electron Spectroscopy

MSE 321 Structural Characterization

Structure analysis: Electron diffraction LEED TEM RHEED

Chapter 3. Experimental Techniques. 3.1 Optical bending beam method

Auger Electron Spectroscopy Overview

X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)

Hole-concentration dependence of band structure in (Bi,Pb) 2 (Sr,La) 2 CuO 6+δ determined by the angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy

UV Source Series. UVS 10/35 gas discharge, UVS 300 duoplasmatron. Key Features

An Introduction to Diffraction and Scattering. School of Chemistry The University of Sydney

APPLIED PHYSICS 216 X-RAY AND VUV PHYSICS (Sept. Dec., 2006)

Instantaneous reduction of graphene oxide at room temperature

MS482 Materials Characterization ( 재료분석 ) Lecture Note 2: UPS

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

X-ray Spectroscopy. Lecture plan. A Critical Look at the Past Accomplishments and Future Prospects. Proposal body not more than 5 pages

Dual Beam Helios Nanolab 600 and 650

Photoelectron Spectroscopy

Surface Characte i r i zat on LEED Photoemission Phot Linear optics

PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY IN AIR (PESA)

MSE 321 Structural Characterization

X-ray absorption spectroscopy.

Surface analysis techniques

Enhances Photoelectrochemical Water Oxidation

A new method of growing graphene on Cu by hydrogen etching

Chemistry 311: Instrumentation Analysis Topic 2: Atomic Spectroscopy. Chemistry 311: Instrumentation Analysis Topic 2: Atomic Spectroscopy

I. Multiple Choice Questions (Type-I)

Electronic structure of Sn/Si(111) 3 3: Indications of a low-temperature phase

Synchrotron Methods in Nanomaterials Research

Experimental 2.1 Introduction. Ultra high vacuum.

5 MeV Mott Polarimeter at Jefferson Lab

Neutron and x-ray spectroscopy

Röntgenpraktikum. M. Oehzelt. (based on the diploma thesis of T. Haber [1])

X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) Auger Electron Spectroscopy (AES)

Lecture 5-8 Instrumentation

PEEM and XPEEM: methodology and applications for dynamic processes

Gaetano L Episcopo. Scanning Electron Microscopy Focus Ion Beam and. Pulsed Plasma Deposition

LAB 01 X-RAY EMISSION & ABSORPTION

Low Energy Electrons and Surface Chemistry

Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics

Electron Spettroscopies

Chapter 103 Spin-Polarized Scanning Tunneling Microscopy

New materials for high- efficiency spin-polarized. polarized electron source

Coupled perpendicular magnetization in Fe/Cu/Fe trilayers

A DIVISION OF ULVAC-PHI

Chemical Analysis in TEM: XEDS, EELS and EFTEM. HRTEM PhD course Lecture 5

X-ray Photoemission Spectroscopy (XPS - Ma4)

raw materials C V Mn Mg S Al Ca Ti Cr Si G H Nb Na Zn Ni K Co A B C D E F

X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)-2

Transcription:

Spin-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy Application Notes Spin-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy experiments were performed in an experimental station consisting of an analysis and a preparation chamber. The preparation chamber is used for substrate cleaning, as well as for the preparation and magnetization of ferromagnetic thin films. t is equipped with several e-beam evaporators (Fe, Co, Ni), gas inlets, a LEED optics, and a magnetic coil. The latter is made of Cu-wire with 1mm diameter. The analysis chamber is equipped with an dual anode x-ray source (Al-K & Mg-K), a He UV-source UVS 300 and a PHOBOS 150 analyzer with mini-mott spin detector (MCD-6/spin). A W(110) single crystal surface served as a substrate for the preparation of the ferromagnetic films. t was cleaned by a standard procedure involving several oxygen treatment cycles at 1800 o C and final flashes at 2500 o C. The cleanliness of the W(110) surface was verified by LEED and x ray core-level spectroscopy showing a well ordered and contamination free surface. Thin films of Fe, Co, or Ni were deposited in situ on the freshly prepared W(110) substrate, which was kept at room temperature. Thin film smoothness was improved by post annealing the sample at 400 C. During the thin film preparation the pressure was kept below 5 10-10 mbar. The resulting ferromagnetic thin films are clean and show a high crystalline quality as can be deduced from the corresponding LEED images shown in Figure 1. The ferromagnetic films were magnetized by pulsed magnetic fields of approximately 500 Oe. The magnetic field was applied along the corresponding easy magnetization axis of the ferromagnetic film which leads to a single domain state of the film. Table 1 lists film thickness, the crystallographic direction of the easy magnetization axis of each film and the corresponding crystallographic direction of the W(110) substrate. Fe(110) Co(0001) Ni(111) Figure 1: LEED images of Fe(110), Co(0001), and Ni(111) films grown on W(110).

Thickness / Å Easy magnetization axis Direction in W Fe(110) 50 110 110 Co(0001) 100 Ni(111) 100 110 0 110 0 01 0 01 Table 1: Film thickness, crystallographic direction of easy magnetization axis and the corresponding direction in the W substrate. The overall principal scheme of the photoemission experiment is shown in Figure 2. Spin-polarized electrons are excited by the UV-light sample and travel through the hemispherical energy analyzer, where they are dispersed in energy and finally hit the mini-mott detector. Here, the He emission line (21.2 ev) from the UVS 300 source is used to excite valence band electrons. The angle between UV light and the sample surface was 20 o and electrons were collected around the surface normal. All spectra were measured at room temperature which is far below the Curie temperature of the investigated ferromagnetic films. The energy and angular resolution of analyzer were set to 100 mev and 2 o, respectively. Figure 2: The principal scheme of spin-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy experiment. The detector consists of 6 front channeltrons allowing the measurements of total spin-integrated signal, and a spin-detector for spin-resolved measurements. n the spin-detector the electrons are accelerated to an energy of 25 kv and scatter on a Th target. Due to the high kinetic energy of the incoming electrons the scattering potential of the nucleus is not symmetric, which is a result of spin-orbit interaction during the scattering process. For example, for spin-up electrons the probability to scatter to the left is higher compared to the probability to scatter to the right. Calculations show that the maximum asymmetry in the scattering, that is, A= L / R, is achieved for scattering angles of 120 o with respect to the direction of incoming beam. nnovation in Surface Spectroscopy and Microscopy Systems

Figure 3: Spin-integrated, spin-resolved photoelectron spectra (left column) and the corresponding spin polarization (right column) as a function of binding energy measured for Fe(110), Co(0001), and Ni(111) thin films. The elastically scattered electrons are detected by 2 pairs of channeltrons which are placed in the vertical and horizontal planes allowing simultaneous measurements of two orthogonal components of the electron spin. The energy window around the elastic peak and the scattering energy are two main factors which define the efficiency of the spin detector. The so-called effective Sherman function, S eff, determines the sensitivity of detector for spin separation, while the figure of merit ( FOM) characterize the efficiency of the spin detector. One of the main sources of error in the calculation of spin polarization on the basis of experimental data is the asymmetry induced by the experimental set-up. n order to remove this error spin-resolved measurements on ferromagnetic samples have to be performed two times for two opposite directions of magnetizations. n case of experiments where spin-orbit effects are studied on non-magnetic sample the circularly polarized light is recommended and two measurements with opposite helicities have to be done.

Figure 3 (left column) shows spin-integrated as well as spin-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy spectra for thin ferromagnetic Fe(110), Co(0001), and Ni(111) films. The corresponding spin polarization as a function of binding energy (Figure 3, right column) was calculated on the basis of raw data for left and right spin channels using the following formula: P 1 Seff L R L R R L R L. Here, L and R are two sets of intensities of left and right channels measured for + and - magnetization directions. The corresponding intensities for spin-up and spin-down channels are calculated by using 0( 1 P), 0(1 P), where 0 is the total intensity of all spin channels. The statistical error in the calculation of the spin polarization is: P Seff 1 40. The spin-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy spectra and the calculated spin polarizations are compared with previously measured data using a classical Mott spin-detector operated at scattering voltage of 100 kv [1-3]. The previously obtained value of -80% spin polarization for the Fe(110)/W(110) measured in similar conditions allows to estimate the Sherman function in our experiments. t is equal to S eff =0.12 when the energy window of elastically back-scattered electrons in the spin-detector is set to 1200 ev.

06.06.2012 L:\komponen.ten\phoibos\marketing\ApplicationNotes\LargeArea\Dokument\LargeAreaMode.ppt References: [1] R. Kurzawa et al., Solid State Commun. 60, 777 (1986). [2] Yu. S. Dedkov et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 2584 (2002). [3] Yu. S. Dedkov et al., Appl. Phys. A 82, 489 (2006). Further reading: J. Kessler, Polarized electrons (Springer, Berlin, 1976). P. D. Johnson et al., Rev. Sci. nstrum. 63, 1902 (1992). P. D. Johnson, Rep. Prog. Phys. 60, 1217 (1997). SPECS Surface Nano Analysis GmbH Voltastrasse 5 13355 Berlin GERMANY Phone: +49 30 467824-0 Fax: +49 30 4642083 E-mail: support@specs.com http://www.specs.com nnovation in Surface Spectroscopy and Microscopy Systems