Dr. A. Neumann German Aerospace Centre DLR Remote Sensing Technology Institute Marine Remote Sensing What is Calibration, why do we need it? Sensor Components Definition of Terms Calibration Standards Pre-launch Calibration In-orbit Calibration Intercalibration between Sensors NASA s SIMBIOS Programme Introduction - What is Calibration? Calibration: establish the link between sensor output signal (voltage, digital numbers) and absolute physical values at sensor input, i.e. describe the overall transfer function of the sensor calibration is a part of sensor characterisation, here in particular with respect to spectral and radiometric parameters (geometric calibration here not considered) parameters to be determined during calibration process depend on: sensor principle detector type application 1
Why do we need calibration? In Ocean Colour we are talking mainly about quantitative remote sensing, i.e. the retrieval of parameters in terms of absolute values (concentrations of water constituents, aerosol content in the atmosphere etc.) The retrieval algorithms use values of spectral radiances (respectively derived reflectances) for the inversion procedure, the accuracy of the retrieval strongly depends on the accuracy of the radiance measurement. The validation of measurements as well as of used models and algorithms need a link between data acquired in-orbit and groundbased or airborne measurements 2 Sensor Components Imager/ Optics Spectral selection unit Focal Plane/ Detector Mechanical scanner Pushbroom camera Imaging spectrometer Filter Grating Prism single detector linear array 2D-array Calibration characterizes the overall performance of the sensor with respect to spectrometry and radiometry, absolute and relative. Remark: since we focus on Ocean Colour, the following implicitely refers to the VIS/NIR spectral range (~400... 1000 nm) 3
Definition of Terms (I) spectral irradiance E(λ): light flux per unit area (Wm -2 nm -1 ) spectral radiance L(λ): light flux per unit area and solid angle (Wm -2 sr -1 nm -1 ) reflectance R(λ): normalisation of upwelling and downwelling fluxes R(λ) = E u (λ)/e d (λ) Halfwidth the reflectance is directly related to 1 target properties spectral response function: relative response of a spectral channel in an instrument as a function of wavelength relative spectral response 0.5 spectral halfwidth: width of the spectral response function at 50% of maximum value wavelength 4 Definition of Terms (II) dark signal: signal measured at instrument output with zero light at the entrance, caused mainly by thermal fluctuations in detector and electr. dark signal non-uniformity (DSNU): differences in dark signals of single pixels of a linear or 2D detector sensitivity: a) slope of the relationship between input and output signals b) minimum signal that can be measured by a sensor dynamic range: ratio of maximum and minimum measurable signal noise-equivalent radiance NE L: minimum resolvable change in input signal, which can be detected (related to radiometric resolution) signal-to-noise ratio (SNR): ratio of usable signal to non-interpretable portion of the signal (i.e. noise) at a given input signal level non-linearity: deviation from the ideal, linear relationship between input and output signals of an instrument 5
Definition of Terms (III) pixel-related non-uniformity (PRNU): normalised relative slope of the response of different pixels in a linear or 2D detector flat-field response: relative response of the sensor over the total field of view when looking on a homogenous target (includes optical effects and PRNU) polarisation sensitivity: sensitivity of the sensor to polarized light at the input 6 Calibration Standards Calibration standards are usually defined by corresponding national authorities, which are linked to international standards. They provide reference light sources with known spectral distribution as well as measurement setups to transfer this primary standard to other light sources, usually by means of transfer radiometers. Specific protocols are recommended by international organisations (in our case Committee of Earth Observation Satellites CEOS) Irradiance sources (standards) are usually lamps with a known spectral distribution, based on the link to the national standard laboratory Radiance sources (standards) are either calibrated radiometric spheres or a setup of a lamp and a diffuser disk with known properties 7
5 % 4 3 2 1 0-1 -2-3 -4 Intercomparision of Laboratory Standards SIRREX-6 comparison of irradiance calibration percent differences from the mean on basis of NIST standards; Satlantic GSFC1 PML JRC CHORS Biosphäre UCSB NRL GSFC2 DLR -5 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 nm 8 Pre-launch Calibration Covers all measurements by laboratory means before instrument delivery for launch to describe spectral and radiometric sensor performance Goal: initial set of parameters which serves as reference for monitoring in-orbit performance and/or in-orbit calibration as well as initial functions to be used for data processing to basic physical values needs extensive laboratory setups, careful and time-consuming measurements general problem: due to lower temperature laboratory sources do not correspond to the spectrum of the Sun - signals are too low in the blue, too high in the red 9
Using lamps + diffusor Radiance Calibration (I) white diffuser standard lamp in a box power supply spectrometer 10 Radiance Calibration (II) Using radiometric sphere (Ulbricht-Sphere) (light beams for 3 different pixels) spectrometer power supply 11
Radiometric Sphere Homogenous radiance field Power supply Diffusing (white) coating inside Lamps inside the sphere 12 Spectral Calibration Light source with monochromator Collimator Sensor (IFOV) Monochromatic light parallel light 13
In-orbit Calibration Covers all measurements made in orbit to either re-calibrate the sensor or to monitor and quantify changes in instrument parameters Why? All instrument parameters are changing with time due to different degradations caused by: normal aging processes contamination of optical parts in orbit exposure of optical parts to Sun light and radiation (UV, particles) exposure of detectors and electronics to radiation (particles) In-orbit calibration is essential to ensure valuable data during the lifetime of the instrument through monitoring of sensor stability gives the basis to account for possible sensor changes in the data processing 14 Absolute Calibration in Orbit In principle two ways are possible: availability of an absolute calibration source on the satellite measurement of the extraterrestrial Sun irradiance Sun Calibration is the usual way implemented in several ocean colour instruments (e.g. MOS, SeaWiFS, MERIS) advantages: the Sun is the most stable light source includes the complete sensor performance from entrance optics up to the detector allows to refer nadir measurement to the natural illumination source (top-of-atmosphere reflectance) problem: degradation of the diffuser Realisation of Sun calibration requires for: a diffuser on board to convert the Sun s irradiance into radiance moving parts to put the diffuser in front of the entrance optics 15
Principle of the Sun Calibration in Orbit During terminator crossing over the North pole (MOS-IRS) 16 MOS-IRS Sun Calibration (I) Direction to Sun Nadir direction 17
MOS-IRS Sun Calibration (II) Nadir Position objective Sun Calibration Position sun direction tube with baffles fixed housing rotating drum diffuser nadir direction Dark Position 18 MOS-IRS Sun Calibration (III) Illumination of the sun diffuser during terminator overfly (1) -variation of incident angle on the diffuser plate (2) -resulting irradiance and sensor response sun sun (1) nadir sun nadir sun nadir nadir sun (2) nadir S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 19
MOS-IRS Sun Calibration (IV) IRS-P3 MOS-B: Sun calibration, relative variations with time (mean of unsaturated pixels, sun incidence angle 40, distance sun-earth not taken into account), ref. to 16.5.96 (day137) 1,20 1,18 ratio 1,16 1,14 1,12 1,10 1,08 1,06 1,04 1,02 1,00 0,98 channel B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 B13 E0 Sun 0,96 0,94 0,92 0,90 1.1 1996 31.12 1997 31.12 1998 31.12 1999 31.12 2000 30.12 Abb. 9 20 Relative Calibration in Orbit Monitoring and quantification of sensor parameters with respect to a reference status (e.g. pre-launch calibration or initial post-launch status) using non-calibrated in-orbit means: built-in light sources like lamps or LEDs extra-terrestial sources, e.g. the Moon Lamps: do not necessarily cover the entire optical path, depending on construction allow special features, e.g. linearity check, spectral properties,... problem: long term stability, spectral irradiance ditribution Moon: covers entire path from entrance optics to detector does not fill the total FOV for pushbroom instruments may cause problems due to inhomogeneity 21
λ1 MOS-IRS Internal Calibration (I) Entrance Optics Cal. Lamp Collimator Optics Grating Entrance Slit Cal. Lamp Imager Focal Plane λ4 22 Kanal 6 Kanal 10 MOS-IRS Internal Calibration (II) 1,08 1,07 M O S-IR S -B ; internal calibration; actual / reference data; averaged over all pixels of a channel; lam p1; level 4 1,06 1,05 B 10 1,04 1,03 B 2 1,02 1,01 1,00 date 1.1.96 31.12.96 31.12.97 31.12.98 31.12.99 30.12.00 23
SeaWiFS Moon Calibration MOS 32 Pixels Images: NASA SeaWiFS Project 24 Intercalibration between Sensors - Why? After ocean colour satellites matured from experimental to operational systems there are several satellites orbiting carrying different sensors, corresponding to different scientific mission goals The sensors acquire data of the same phenomena at different overflight time and with their specifics, e.g. with respect to viewing geometry, spectral or spatial resolution These measurements may complement each other and give new insight through synergetic investigations Therefore a unified scale for different instruments is necessary ideal goal would be to have a common absolute scale for all sensors 25
Intercalibration between Sensors - How? Since all sensors are calibrated pre-launch to a laboratory standard, this calibration can be linked together using transfer radiometers (see above for the problems) once in-orbit, the situation is more complicated: intercalibration can be achieved by common measurements of dedicated targets or sources like the Sun, the Moon or selected nadir test sites Another problem is the intercomparision (or intercalibration) of derived products (e.g. Chlorophyll concentrations) - this involves the entire discussion about different retrieval algorithms, bio-optical models etc. 26 Problems of Sensor Intercalibration The Sun shall be used as a common source, but still differences while looking at other targets may occure. However, the Sun forms a common normalisation standard. inhomogenity and small size make Moon measurements less favourable for ocean colour sensors, but as a grey reflector the Moon is a very stable medium level reference different overpassing time and different viewing geometries affect the direct comparability of TOA data. However, since TOA radiance is the primary measured parameter, it should be the value to be compared. computation of BOA values involves different atmospheric correction procedures and models and does not answer the question what is the truth on ground. The way out is the normalisation to an agreed reference measurement (for SIMBIOS: MOBY) 27
NASA s SIMBIOS Programme (cp. http://simbios.gsfc.nasa.gov/) Consists of the SIMBIOS Science Team and the SIMBIOS Project Office The SIMBIOS program is substantially augmented by the participation of the NASA-supported MODIS Oceans Team and SeaWiFS Calibration and Validation program SIMBIOS supports four primary activities: data product validation sensor calibration data merger algorithm evaluation satellite data processing. The data processing facility is operational and is scaled for limited data storage (in situ and satellite), product generation, and analyses support as required for SIMBIOS specific investigations. 28