Estimation of speciated and total mercury dry deposition at monitoring

Similar documents
Approach Estimating Mercury Dry Deposition for AMNeT Leiming Zhang

Estimation of Speciated and Total Mercury Dry Deposition. Leiming Zhang. Pierrette Blanchard, David Gay, and many others

Locations of Monitoring Stations in the Mercury Trends Network

How does the physical environment influence communities and ecosystems? Hoodoos in Cappadocia, Turkey

GAMINGRE 8/1/ of 7

Swine Enteric Coronavirus Disease (SECD) Situation Report June 30, 2016

United States Climate

Appendix E Environmental Analysis Tables

An Internet-based Agricultural Land Use Trends Visualization System (AgLuT)

Global Climates. Name Date

Lesson 2: Terrestrial Ecosystems

remain on the trees all year long) Example: Beaverlodge, Alberta, Canada

Swine Enteric Coronavirus Disease (SECD) Situation Report Sept 17, 2015

Modeling the Effects of Climate and Land Cover Change in the Stoney Brook Subbasin of the St. Louis River Watershed

An Atmospheric Chemistry Module for Modeling Toxic Industrial Chemicals (TICs) in SCIPUFF

Field Content Description

Global Biogeography. Natural Vegetation. Structure and Life-Forms of Plants. Terrestrial Ecosystems-The Biomes

The Colorado Drought of 2002 in Perspective

2014 Meteorology Summary

2016 Meteorology Summary

forest tropical jungle swamp marsh prairie savanna pampas Different Ecosystems (rainforest)

Average temperature ( F) World Climate Zones. very cold all year with permanent ice and snow. very cold winters, cold summers, and little rain or snow

16 Global Climate. Learning Goals. Summary. After studying this chapter, students should be able to:

Changkun Fu, Wanqin Yang, Bo Tan, Zhenfeng Xu, Yu Zhang, Jiaping Yang, Xiangyin Ni, Fuzhong Wu

Time-Series Trends of Mercury Deposition Network Data

John G. Watson Judith C. Chow Mark C. Green Xiaoliang Wang Desert Research Institute, Reno, NV

Improvement and Sensitivity Analysis of the Atmospheric Chemistry Module for Modeling TICs in SCIPUFF

The Climate of Oregon Climate Zone 5 High Plateau

Dichotomous Key Biology Lab

Swine Enteric Coronavirus Disease (SECD) Situation Report Mar 5, 2015

Organism Species Population Community Ecosystem

Physical Features of Monsoon Asia. 192 Unit 7 Teachers Curriculum Institute 60 N 130 E 140 E 150 E 60 E 50 N 160 E 40 N 30 N 150 E.

Use your text to define the following term. Use the terms to label the figure below. Define the following term.

2003 Water Year Wrap-Up and Look Ahead

Summary of Natural Hazard Statistics for 2008 in the United States

Climate also has a large influence on how local ecosystems have evolved and how we interact with them.

X All databased and barcoded

Biomes of the World What is a Biome?

Name Hour. Chapter 4 Review

Natural Texas. Regions and Climates

Tropical Climates Zone

Ecology 312 SI STEVEN F. Last Session: Aquatic Biomes, Review This Session: Plate Tectonics, Lecture Quiz 2

(Dis)Assembly of the Great Lakes Forests

Earth s Major Terrerstrial Biomes. *Wetlands (found all over Earth)

Regents Earth Science Unit 7: Water Cycle and Climate

AFRCC AIR FORCE RESCUE COORDINATION CENTER

Lecture 24 Plant Ecology

The Colorado Drought : 2003: A Growing Concern. Roger Pielke, Sr. Colorado Climate Center.

Climax Vegetation is the natural vegetation in the last possible stage of vegetation development. Climax vegetation is stable and in balance with the

Lecture 26 Section 8.4. Mon, Oct 13, 2008

Evaluating Wildlife Habitats

Let s Talk Climate! Nolan Doesken Colorado Climate Center Colorado State University. Yampatika Seminar February 16, 2011 Steamboat Springs, Colorado

ICSE Board Class X Geography Board Paper- 2014

Biome PSC CIRCLE PSC CIRCLE

Colorado s 2003 Moisture Outlook

Chapter 7 Part III: Biomes

Webinar and Weekly Summary February 15th, 2011

TILT, DAYLIGHT AND SEASONS WORKSHEET

Long-term Water Quality Monitoring in Estero Bay

Technical Note: Hydrology of the Lake Chilwa wetland, Malawi

2012 USACE Drought Actions

PART ONE A Valuable Resource for CERM ICP-MS in Catskills Research Presented by Alison Keimowitz Associate Professor of Chemistry, Vassar College

Funding provided by NOAA Sectoral Applications Research Project CLIMATE. Basic Climatology Colorado Climate Center

Soil Moisture Prediction and Assimilation

Comparison of NASA AIRS and MODIS Land Surface Temperature and Infrared Emissivity Measurements from the EOS AQUA platform

UNIT 3. World Ecosystems

Module 3. Basic Ecological Principles

CH. 3: Climate and Vegetation

The Climate of Bryan County

Variability and trends in daily minimum and maximum temperatures and in diurnal temperature range in Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia

Botany 401 Vascular Flora of Wisconsin

The Climate of Oregon Climate Zone 4 Northern Cascades

2003 Moisture Outlook

Missouri River Basin Water Management Monthly Update

CLIMATE OVERVIEW. Thunder Bay Climate Overview Page 1 of 5

3 Temperate and Polar Zones

Weather History on the Bishop Paiute Reservation

Nursing Facilities' Life Safety Standard Survey Results Quarterly Reference Tables

IPC 24th Session, Dehradun Nov 2012

The Climate of Murray County

Streamflow, Sediment, and Nutrient Simulation of the Bitterroot Watershed using SWAT

What Does It Take to Get Out of Drought?

Drought Monitoring Capability of the Oklahoma Mesonet. Gary McManus Oklahoma Climatological Survey Oklahoma Mesonet

Technical Note: Hydrology of the Lukanga Swamp, Zambia

The Effects of Weather on Urban Trail Use: A National Study

AIR FORCE RESCUE COORDINATION CENTER

Biomes of the World Roxanne Coffey Ms. Coffey

Satellites, Weather and Climate Module 40: Agriculture & forestry in a changing climate

Rangeland Carbon Fluxes in the Northern Great Plains

Weather and Climate of the Rogue Valley By Gregory V. Jones, Ph.D., Southern Oregon University

BIOMES. Definition of a Biome. Terrestrial referring to land. Climatically controlled sets of ecosystems. Characterized by distinct vegetation

1.3 What are the needs of Organisms? *Autotrophs: organisms that can (i.e. plants) *Heterotrophs: organisms that (i.e. humans)

Algae and Dissolved Oxygen Dynamics of Landa Lake and the Upper Spring Run

Highlights of the 2006 Water Year in Colorado

Science Standard 1: Students analyze monthly precipitation and temperature records, displayed in bar charts, collected in metric units (mm).

Turmoil in the Global Biosphere A View from Space

Tracking the Climate Of Northern Colorado Nolan Doesken State Climatologist Colorado Climate Center Colorado State University

Unit 2. United States Physical Geography

Changing Hydrology under a Changing Climate for a Coastal Plain Watershed

Implementation of the NCEP operational GLDAS for the CFS land initialization

Transcription:

SUPPORTING INFORMATION Estimation of speciated and total mercury dry deposition at monitoring locations in eastern and central North America L. Zhang, P. Blanchard, D.A. Gay, E.M. Prestbo, M.R. Risch, D. Johnson, J. Narayan, R. Zsolway, T.M. Holsen, E.K. Miller, M.S. Castro, J.A. Graydon, V.L. St. Louis, J. Dalziel Contents Table S. Population density within the 5km radius circle surrounding each site and defined site categories. Also shown in the last column is the fraction of each land use category (LUC) within the km circle surrounding each site (number in brackets are LUC number defined in Zhang et al., (23). Table S2. Litterfall measurements collected at selected MDN sites. Table S3. Seasonal averages ±standard deviation of speciated Hg ambient concentrations (GEM in ng m -3 and GOM and PBM in pg m -3 ) from monitoring data collected during the years of 28 and 29. Spring: Mar., Apr. and May; Summer: Jun., Jul. and Aug.; Fall: Sep., Oct. and Nov.; Winter: Dec., Jan. and Feb. Figure S. Seasonal average concentrations for (a) GOM (pg m -3 ), (b) PBM (pg m -3 ) and (c) GEM (ng m -3 ). Figure S2. Average diurnal cycle and monthly V d (left columns) and normalized V d by their respective annual average V d (right columns) from 29 data at Kejimkujik forest site.

Table S. Population density within the 5km radius circle surrounding each site and defined site categories. Also shown in the last column is the fraction of each land use category (LUC) within the km circle surrounding each site (number in brackets are LUC number defined in Zhang et al., (23). AMNet Site Site Name Grid count Area (km²) Max / km² Mean / km² Std / km² Site category Fraction of each LUC with km circle. LUC number in ID bracket. MD8 Piney Reservoir 4 72 85 37 28 rural.(3),.25(7),.5(),.(2),.(3),.4(4) MD99 Beltsville 42 729 923 326 28 suburban.36(5),.89(7),.34(),.2(4),.344(2),.22(25) MS2 Grand Bay NERR 39 677 356 336 655 rural.2(),.37(5),.4(),.4(3),.423(2),.32(2) NH6 Thompson Farm 43 747 78 524 4 rural.5(),.5(3),.3(3),.25(5),.2(23),.77(25) NJ5 Brigantine 43 747 6243 649 233 subrural.239(3),.63(4),.34(7),.3(5),.28(2),.46,(23),.27(25) NJ3 New Brunswick 42 729 928 4 247 urban.82(3),.24(7),.249(5),.438(2),.8(23) NJ32 Chester 42 729 5784 5 927 suburban.23(7),.3 (),.47(5),.565(2),.5(23),. (24) NJ54 Elizabeth Lab 39 677 32464 274 7 urban.42 (3),.28(),.889(2),.4(23) NS Kejimkujik 42 729 2 7 3 rural.67(4),.33(25) National Park NY6 Bronx 42 729 83589 888 2433 urban.5(7).95(2) NY2 Huntington Wildlife 44 764 6 3 rural.4(3),.5(23),.45(25) NY43, NY95 Rochester 42 729 854 2859 2638 suburban.(2) OH2 Athens Super Site 42 729 298 238 454 rural.4(7),.(),.25(3),.25(25) OK99 Stilwell 42 729 44 63 67 rural.5(),.2(5),.28(7),.4(),.4(3),.67(4),.43(2),.2(24),.5(25) UT96 Antelope Island 44 764 485 8 448 suburban.3(),.627(4),.279(5),.72(2),.9(2) UT97 Salt Lake City 42 729 67 3827 3323 urban.4(),.4(),.(4),.(2),.972(2) VT99 Underhill 45 78 48 8 7 rural.5(),.5(4),.3(7),.(),.2(3),.2(4) WV99 Canaan Valley 4 72 3 6 3 rural.3 (),.97 (25) Institute Experimental Lakes Area 5 868 rural.25(4),.75(25) (i) The population estimates are from the 2 Gridded Population of the World - GPW v3 database prepared by the Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN), Columbia University; and Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT), 25. http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/gpw/ (ii) Grid and Area: number of population grid cells and their total area used for statistics calculation; the original grids are ~ 4.64 km x 4.64 km. (iii) Definition of LUC number:. water; 2. ice; 3. inland lake; 4. evergreen needleleaf trees; 5. evergreen broadleaf trees; 6. deciduous needleleaf trees; 7. deciduous broadleaf trees; 8. tropical broadleaf trees; 9. drought deciduous trees;. evergreen broadleaf shrubs;. deciduous shrubs; 2. thorn shrubs; 3. short grass and forbs; 4. long grass; 5. crops; 6. rice; 7. sugar; 8. maize; 9. cotton; 2. irrigated crops; 2. urban; 22. tundra; 23. swamp; 24. desert; 25. mixed wood forests; 26. transitional forest.

Table S2. Litterfall measurements collected at selected MDN sites following from Risch et al., 22a. MDN site number Site name Latitude Longitude Elevation (m) Co-located monitoring a at MDN site Prevalent tree species in study plot Forest cover class of study plot National Land Cover Database b class for study plot Annual litterfall deposition ( g/m 2 ) GA9 Okefenokee 3.74-82.3 47 NTN pine, oak mixed transitional 5.4 ±. IN2 Roush Lake 4.84-85.46 244 NTN maple, poplar, ash, cherry deciduous row crops 3.9 ± 5.2 IN2 Clifty Falls 38.76-85.42 256 none maple, poplar, ash deciduous forest and residential 6. ±.2 IN26 Fort Harrison 39.86-86.2 26 none oak, maple, poplar, cherry deciduous urban 7.4 ± 5.5 IN34 Indiana Dunes 4.63-87.9 28 NTN oak, maple, hickory deciduous pasture 8.7 ± 5.7 KY Mammoth Cave 37.3-86.5 236 NTN oak, maple, hickory, ash deciduous pasture 2.6 ±. MD8 Piney Reservoir 39.7-79. 769 NTN, AMNet oak, maple, cherry deciduous deciduous forest 5.3 ± 2. MD99 Beltsville 39.3-76.82 46 NTN, AMNet oak, maple, beech, sweetgum deciduous urban 5.5 ±. MI48 Seney 46.29-85.95 26 NTN red pine, jack pine, balsam fir, birch coniferous woody wetland 7.4 ±.4 MN6 Marcell 47.53-93.47 43 NTN aspen, maple deciduous deciduous forest 3.8 ±.4 MN98 Blaine 45.4-93.22 275 none aspen, maple deciduous not determined 7.8 ±.3 NY68 Biscuit Brook 4.99-74.5 634 NTN, CASTNET beech, maple deciduous deciduous forest 5.3 ±. OH2 Athens 39.3-82.2 275 AMNet oak, maple, hickory, cherry deciduous pasture 8.8 ± 2.8 PA3 Allegheny Portage 4.46-78.56 739 none oak, maple, beech, cherry deciduous commercial industrial 3.6 ± 4. SC5 Cape Romaine 32.94-79.66 3 NTN oak, hickory, sweetgum, pine mixed residential 9.3 ±.2 TN Smoky Mountains 35.66-83.59 64 NTN, CASTNET maple, poplar, birch, pine, hemlock deciduous mixed forest 4.9 ± 4.7 VA28 Shenandoah 38.52-78.44,74 NTN, CASTNET birch, locust, oak, pine mixed deciduous forest 7.8 ±.8 VT99 Underhill 44.53-72.87 399 NTN, AMNet, AirMon birch, maple, beech, hemlock, spruce mixed deciduous forest.3 ±.8 WI9 Popple River 45.8-88.4 42 NTN birch, maple, aspen, fir mixed herbaceous wetland. ±. WI3 Devil's Lake 43.44-89.68 389 none cottonwood, maple, oak, elm deciduous pasture 4.6 ±. WI36 Trout Lake 46.5-89.65 5 NTN pine, fir, spruce coniferous evergreen forest 7.6 ±.4 WI99 Lake Geneva 42.58-88.5 288 NTN oak, basswood, ash, elm deciduous deciduous forest 4.3 ±.3 WV99 Canaan Valley 39.6-79.42 988 AMNet birch, maple, beech, hemlock, spruce mixed pasture 9.9 ±.3 a MDN, Mercury Deposition Network; NTN, National Trends Network; AMNet, Atmospheric Mercury Network; CASTNET, Clean Air Status and Trends Network; AirMon, Atmospheric Integrated Research Monitoring Network. b Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics Consortium (2).

Table S3. Seasonal averages ±standard deviation of speciated Hg ambient concentrations (GEM in ng m -3 and GOM and PBM in pg m -3 ) from monitoring data collected during the years of 28 and 29. Spring: Mar., Apr. and May; Summer: Jun., Jul. and Aug.; Fall: Sep., Oct. and Nov.; Winter: Dec., Jan. and Feb. GEM GOM PBM Site Code Spring Summer fall winter Spring Summer fall winter Spring Summer fall winter MD8.54 ±.9.25 ±.26.2 ±.9.54 ±.2 35.88 ± 34.79 9.95 ±.88 9.2 ± 29 22.7 ± 3.9 8.9 ± 6.8 3.2 ± 2.3 4.2 ± 3.6.35 ± 9.29 MD99.5 ±.22.39 ±.24.98 ±.7.34 ±.7 5.4 ± 7.4 3.6 ± 8..46 ± 2.85 ± 4.55 7.54 ± 6.26 5.35 ± 3.88.65 ±.2 6.4 ± 8.75 MS2.45 ±.27.36 ±.7.29 ±.4.45 ±.33 8.9 ± 22.2 9.53 ± 6.54 6.46 ±.26 4.53 ±.26 3.24 ± 3.42 2.79 ± 5.85 5.4 ± 8.85 5.59 ± 6.27 NH6.5 ±.4.26 ±.2.5 ±.5.39 ±.8 5.5 ± 6.68.58 ± 2.68.49 ±.82 3.42 ± 3.54 4.24 ± 5.28 2.45 ±.74.85 ±.2 4.25 ± 4.56 NJ5.76 ±.59.35 ±.3.45 ±.8 22.7 ±.8.3 ±.65.4 ±.98 2 ± 2.57.98 ± 2.56 4.68 ± 4.5 NJ3 2.3 ±.35 2.25 ±.35.82 ±.23 3.5 ± 6.27.79 ± 2.65.59 ± 2.6.2 ± 8.8 3.66 ± 4.99 3.55 ± 6.93 NJ32.98 ±.77.97 ±.77.38 ±.25.22 ±.36 8.57 ± 9.92 2.76 ± 3.63 4.93 ± 9.8 9.29 ±.2 9.3 ± 2.3 5.2 ± 8.24.82 ± 4.7 4.29 ± 34.86 NJ54.78 ±.64.67 ±.48.6 ±.2.9 ±.63 8.7 ±.57 2.48 ±.59 5.68 ± 6.5 5.48 ± 5.83 6.57 ± 4.4 5.6 ± 4.3 7.65 ± 26.37 9.85 ± 4.24 NS.58 ±.35.27 ±.26.7 ±.22.45 ±.9 4.9 ± 6.22 2.86 ± 3.55.53 ±.58.49 ±.33 7.98 ± 8..76 ±.3.28 ±.2 5.8 ± 4.87 NY6.62 ±.29.58 ±.38.4 ±.34.43 ±.39.68 ± 5.87 7.62 ± 8.68 5.2 ± 5.97 3.69 ± 3.29 9.3 ± 7.4 4.97 ± 4.8 5.3 ± 5.4.93 ±.93 NY2.3 ±.35.25 ±.3.37 ± 3..6 ±.5.59 ± 3.33.7 ± 2.52.53 ±.6.42 ± 4.3 2.49 ± 3.6.65 ± 3.6.92 ± 2.5 7.6 ± 4.3 NY43.56 ±.65.52 ±.3.49 ±.35.72 ±.29 3.74 ± 9 3.8 ± 5.73 2.76 ± 5.23 3.92 ± 5.69.6 ± 8.34 5.59 ± 3.79 4.67 ± 5.47 6.5 ± 4.9 NY95.49 ±.7.38 ±.9.38 ±.6.47 ±.5.5 ± 5.39 5.4 ± 6.5 2.7 ±.59 6.88 ± 7.77.35 ± 6.99 6. ± 3.33 2.52 ± 7.53 6.43 ±.52 OH2.54 ± 3.72.4 ±.78.36 ±.2.4 ±.8 2.8 ± 76.8 7.9 ± 4.66 4.3 ± 2.67 6.8 ± 7.88 4.23 ± 3.6 5.57 ± 4.27 5.6 ± 4.26.9 ± 9.87 OK99.43 ±.6.24 ±.25.26 ±.5.49 ±.8 3.87 ± 5.5 2.76 ± 5.57.47 ± 2.8 2.4 ± 2.66 4.79 ± 3.3 4.2 ± 2.47 2.82 ±.9 5.66 ± 4.9 UT96.59 ±.2.5 ±.23.54 ±.2 22.23 ± 22.98 9.66 ± 3.24 3.6 ± 3.6 4.75 ±.7 3.4 ±.72 29.83 ± 32.72 UT97 2.4 ±.76 2.2 ±.76 2.2 ±.36 2.3 ±.62 8.7 ± 33.89 26.75 ± 36.9 25.9 ± 45.2 9.7 ± 28.38.2 ± 23.6 9. ± 9.63 23.54 ± 92. 2.29 ± 29.4 VT99.63 ±.8.35 ±.26.27 ±.6.63 ±.2 7.2 ± 2.28.6 ± 2.6.32 ± 3. 2.56 ± 2.9 6.98 ± 6.9 3.75 ± 2.8 4.8 ± 4.5 2.37 ± 2.87 WV99.67 ±.2.37 ±.9.64 ±.2 5.2 ±.57 9.86 ± 8.6 2.8 ± 7.42 5.86 ± 8.28 6.98 ± 6.24 8.67 ± 6.22.34 ±.8.23 ±.6.5 ±.4.34 ±.2 3.32 ± 5.2.74 ±.82.5 ±.53.69 ±. 6.55 ± 5.58 3.47 ± 2.44 2.32 ± 2. 8.38 ± 6.49

Figure S. Seasonal average concentrations for (a) GOM (pg m -3 ), (b) PBM (pg m -3 ) and (c) GEM (ng m -3 ). 35 3 25 2 5 5 (a) GOM Spring Summer Fall Winter MD8 MD99 MS2 NH6 NJ5 NJ3 NJ32 NJ54 NS NY6 NY2 NY43 NY95 OH2 OK99 UT96 UT97 VT99 WV99 4 35 (b) PBM 3 25 2 5 5 MD8 MD99 MS2 NH6 NJ5 NJ3 NJ32 NJ54 NS NY6 NY2 NY43 NY95 OH2 OK99 UT96 UT97 VT99 WV99 2.5 2 (c) GEM.5.5 MD8 MD99 MS2 NH6 NJ5 NJ3 NJ32 NJ54 NS NY6 NY2 NY43 NY95 OH2 OK99 UT96 UT97 VT99 WV99

Figure S2. Average diurnal cycle and monthly V d (left columns) and normalized V d by their respective annual average V d (right columns) from 29 data at Kejimkujik forest site. 2.5.3.6 GOM V d ( cm s - ) 2.5.5 2 4 6 8 2468222.25.2.5..5.4.2.8.6.4.2 2 4 6 8 2 4 6 8 2 22.4.2.8.6.4.2 GEM GOM PBM Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec PBM and GEM V d ( cm s - ) Normalized V d 2.5.3 2.5.5.25.2.5..5 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Hour Hour GOM V d ( cm s - ) PBM and GEM V d ( cm s - ) Normalized V d