Lund/Barnard USPAS Problem 1

Similar documents
Accelerator Physics Final Exam pts.

S2E: Solenoidal Focusing

S2E: Solenoidal Focusing

03.lec Solenoid Focusing*

04.sup Equations of Motion and Applied Fields *

Transverse Dynamics II

Charged particle motion in external fields

Problems in Magnetostatics

S1: Particle Equations of Motion S1A: Introduction: The Lorentz Force Equation

Accelerator Physics Homework #3 P470 (Problems: 1-5)

Three Loose Ends: Edge Focusing; Chromaticity; Beam Rigidity.

12. Acceleration and Normalized Emittance *

06.lec Acceleration and Normalized Emittance *

Basic Mathematics and Units

Lattice Design in Particle Accelerators

University of Illinois at Chicago Department of Physics

04.sup Equations of Motion and Applied Fields*

08. Equations of Motion including Acceleration, Space Charge, Bending, and Momentum Spread*

Beam Dynamics. D. Brandt, CERN. CAS Bruges June 2009 Beam Dynamics D. Brandt 1

Department of Physics PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION 2015 Part II. Long Questions

Theory English (Official)

Phys 622 Problems Chapter 5

Analysis of Slice Transverse Emittance Evolution in a Photocathode RF Gun. Abstract

Beam Dynamics with Space- Charge

Transverse dynamics. Transverse dynamics: degrees of freedom orthogonal to the reference trajectory

Ultra-Relativistic Heavy Ion Physics (FYSH551), May 31, 2013 Jan Rak and Thorsten Renk

D. Brandt, CERN. CAS Frascati 2008 Accelerators for Newcomers D. Brandt 1

Nonlinear Single-Particle Dynamics in High Energy Accelerators

S9: Momentum Spread Effects and Bending S9A: Formulation

CHARGED PARTICLE MOTION IN CONSTANT AND UNIFORM ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS

Suppression of Radiation Excitation in Focusing Environment * Abstract

Self-consistent analysis of three dimensional uniformly charged ellipsoid with zero emittance

Graduate Written Examination Spring 2014 Part I Thursday, January 16th, :00am to 1:00pm

Physics 598ACC Accelerators: Theory and Applications

CERN Accelerator School. Intermediate Accelerator Physics Course Chios, Greece, September Low Emittance Rings

Introduction to electron and photon beam physics. Zhirong Huang SLAC and Stanford University

IOTA Integrable Optics Test Accelerator at Fermilab. Sergei Nagaitsev May 21, 2012 IPAC 2012, New Orleans

06. Orbit Stability and the Phase Amplitude Formulation *

Space Charge Mi-ga-on

S5: Linear Transverse Particle Equations of Motion without Space Charge, Acceleration, and Momentum Spread S5A: Hill's Equation

S5: Linear Transverse Particle Equations of Motion without Space Charge, Acceleration, and Momentum Spread S5A: Hill's Equation

THE UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY FACULTY OF SCIENCE INTERMEDIATE PHYSICS PHYS 2912 PHYSICS 2B (ADVANCED) ALL QUESTIONS HAVE THE VALUE SHOWN

University of Alberta

Hill s equations and. transport matrices

Electromagnetism Answers to Problem Set 9 Spring 2006

S3: Description of Applied Focusing Fields S3A: Overview

Motion of Charged Particles in Fields

The Accelerator Hamiltonian in a Straight Coordinate System

Lecture 2: Modeling Accelerators Calculation of lattice functions and parameters. X. Huang USPAS, January 2015 Hampton, Virginia

Magnets and Lattices. - Accelerator building blocks - Transverse beam dynamics - coordinate system

Assignment 5. Ian Rittersdorf Nuclear Engineering & Radiological Sciences

RF LINACS. Alessandra Lombardi BE/ ABP CERN

Introduction to Accelerators

Outline. Liouville s theorem Canonical coordinates Hamiltonian Symplecticity Symplectic integration Symplectification algorithm

NIU Ph.D. Candidacy Examination Fall 2018 (8/21/2018) Electricity and Magnetism

Chapter 27 Sources of Magnetic Field

High-Intensity Ion Beam Neutralization and Drift Compression Experiments

Space Charge in Linear Machines

Problems of Chapter 1: Introduction

8.333: Statistical Mechanics I Fall 2007 Test 2 Review Problems

02. Multipole Fields *

J09M.1 - Coupled Pendula

Single particle motion

4. Statistical description of particle beams

BEAM INSTABILITIES IN LINEAR MACHINES 1.

free- electron lasers I (FEL)

APPENDIX Z. USEFUL FORMULAS 1. Appendix Z. Useful Formulas. DRAFT 13:41 June 30, 2006 c J.D Callen, Fundamentals of Plasma Physics

P 3 SOURCE SOURCE IMAGE

Graduate Accelerator Physics. G. A. Krafft Jefferson Lab Old Dominion University Lecture 1

Introduction to Accelerator Physics 2011 Mexican Particle Accelerator School

Phys 4322 Final Exam - Solution May 12, 2015

Selected electrostatic problems (Lecture 14)

Computer Algebra for Physics Examples

Generation and Dynamics of Magnetized Beams for High-Energy Electron Cooling *

Physics 610. Adv Particle Physics. April 7, 2014

High-Resolution. Transmission. Electron Microscopy

Uppsala universitet Institutionen för astronomi och rymdfysik Anders Eriksson

LCLS S-band Structure Coupler

Evaluating the Emittance Increase Due to the RF Coupler Fields

Depths of Field & Focus

Fall Quarter 2010 UCSB Physics 225A & UCSD Physics 214 Homework 1

Welcome back to PHY 3305

Implementation of an iterative matching scheme for the Kapchinskij-Vladimirskij equations in the WARP code. Sven H. Chilton

SC forces RMS Envelope SC Child Langmuir law SCC Simulation Codes LEBT Simulation

Part 8: Rigid Body Dynamics

PHYSICS 250 May 4, Final Exam - Solutions

Accelerator Physics Weak Focussing. A. Bogacz, G. A. Krafft, and T. Zolkin Jefferson Lab Colorado State University Lecture 2

Low Emittance Machines

Exam 2 Solutions. ε 3. ε 1. Problem 1

QUALIFYING EXAMINATION, Part 1. 2:00 PM 5:00 PM, Thursday September 3, 2009

1. Electricity and Magnetism (Fall 1995, Part 1) A metal sphere has a radius R and a charge Q.

Lecture 4: Emittance Compensation. J.B. Rosenzweig USPAS, UW-Madision 6/30/04

THE UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY FACULTY OF SCIENCE INTERMEDIATE PHYSICS PHYS 2912 PHYSICS 2B (ADVANCED) ALL QUESTIONS HAVE THE VALUE SHOWN

2nd Year Electromagnetism 2012:.Exam Practice

E. Wilson - CERN. Components of a synchrotron. Dipole Bending Magnet. Magnetic rigidity. Bending Magnet. Weak focusing - gutter. Transverse ellipse

PBL (Problem-Based Learning) scenario for Accelerator Physics Mats Lindroos and E. Métral (CERN, Switzerland) Lund University, Sweden, March 19-23,

07. The Courant Snyder Invariant and the Betatron Formulation *

Magnetostatics III Magnetic Vector Potential (Griffiths Chapter 5: Section 4)

Exam, FK5024, Nuclear & particle physics, astrophysics & cosmology, October 26, 2017

Accelerator Physics. Elena Wildner. Transverse motion. Benasque. Acknowldements to Simon Baird, Rende Steerenberg, Mats Lindroos, for course material

Transcription:

Problem Lund/Barnard USPAS 207 Consider a round uniform ion beam with a current of ampere, composed of Hg + ions (atomic mass A =200), a kinetic energy of 2 MeV, a beam radius of 2 cm and normalized emittance of mm-mrad. Calculate for these beam parameters (to or 2 significant figures): a) β = v 0 /c (assume non-relativistic beam) b) n = number density of ions in beam c) kt = transverse temperature (express in ev) d) λ D = transverse Debye length e) Q = generalized perveance f) Λ = plasma parameter g) Δφ = potential difference between center and edge of beam. For reference: e =.6 x 0-9 C [proton charge] k B =.38 x 0-23 J/K [Boltzmann's constant] ε 0 = 8.854 x 0-2 F/m [permittivity of free space] c = 3 x 0 8 m/s [speed of light in free space] m amu =.66 x 0-27 kg [atomic mass unit] m amu c 2 = 93. x 0 6 ev [atomic mass unit in ev]

Lund/Barnard USPAS 207 Problem 2 Show that: where g is any beam quantity that is a function of r only.

Lund/Barnard USPAS 207 Problem 3 Let the equation of motion for a single particle be: Here x is the usual transverse coordinate and s is the longitudinal coordinate. α(s) is a coefficient that depends only on s. Calculate the derivative with respect to s of the square of the emittance:

Problem 4 (TPD ) - Lamor Frame For a uniform solenoidal channel: with no acceleration and an axisymmetric ( / θ = 0) beam with B a z (s) = B 0 = const. γ b β b = const. φ = φ r = φ x x r x r r the particle equations of motion reduce to: x = qb 0 mγ b β b c y y = qb 0 mγ b β b c x r = x 2 + y 2 q φ x mγb 3β2 b c2 r r q φ mγb 3β2 b c2 r y r a) Parralel steps taken in the class notes to transform the quations of motion to a co-rotating frame: x = x cos(k l s) + y sin(k l s) ỹ = x sin(k l s) + y cos(k l s) Find an expression for k l to reduce the equations of motion to the decoupled form: x + ˆk x = ỹ + ˆkỹ = q φ x mγb 3β2 b c2 r r q φ ỹ mγb 3β2 b c2 r r and identify ˆk = const. Hint: The transformation can be carried out directly. But you may find the algreba simpler using complex coordinates as in the class notes: z = x + iy i = e iθ = cos θ + i sin θ z = x + iỹ

b) If the direction of the magnetic field is reversed: how will the dynamics be influenced? c) Neglect space-charge: B 0 B 0 φ = 0 and sketch a typical orbit in the rotating Lamor frame. Will this orbit appear more complicated in the Laboratory frame? Why? Bonus: Sketch the orbit taking advantage of simple choices of inital conditions that can always be made through choice of coordinates. 2

Problem 5 (TPD 4) - Lamor Frame a) From the Lorentz Force equation, show that a static magnetic field B a cannot change the kinetic energy of a particle; E = (γ )mc 2 = const. m d dt ( γβ ) = qβ B a Lorentz Force Equation γ = d x β = β 2 c dt Here γ and β are exact (unexpanded) forms that should not be confusd with γ b and β b ẑ. b) In Class, it was shown for a solenoid magnet with azimuthal symmetry ( θ magnetic field can be expanded in terms of the on-axis field as: = 0), that the Br a ( ) ν (r, z) = ν!(ν )! ν= Bz a (r, z) = B z0 (z) + ν= B z0 (z) B a z (r = 0, z) 2ν B z0 (z) ( r ) 2ν z 2ν 2 ( ) ν 2ν B z0 (z) ( r ) 2ν (ν!) 2 z 2ν 2 on-axis field Take E E b and apply the paraxial equations of motion (see Sec. SG class notes) to show that if nonlinear applied force terms are dropped ( x 2, xy, xy, etc.), the equations of motion are: x + (γ bβ b ) (γ b β b ) x B z0 2[Bρ] y B z0 [Bρ] y = y + (γ bβ b ) (γ b β b ) y + B z0 2[Bρ] x + B z0 [Bρ] x = [Bρ] γ bβ b mc q q φ mγb 3β2 b c2 x q φ mγb 3β2 b c2 y B z0 = B z0(z) z c) Qualitative only: If there are no axial acceleration fields, we take γ b β b = const., [Bρ] = const., are the results of part b) inconsistent with part a)? If so, could they still be OK to use? d) Show if we take B a = A, we can generate the linear field components: from A = ˆθ 2 B z0r A = ˆr Br a = B z0 2 z r Bz a = B z0 ( A z r θ A ) ( θ + z ˆθ Ar z A ) z + ẑ ( (raθ ) A ) r r r r θ

e) Paraxial approximate the canonincal angular momentum [ ( P θ = x p + qa )] z as P θ mγ b β b c(xy yx ) + q B z0 2 Use equation of motion in part b) to show that for a beam with φ = φ(r). d dz P θ = 0 P θ = const. ( x 2 + y 2) 2

Problem 6 (TPD 4) A thin lense changes the angle of a particle trajectory but not the coordinate: This action can be specified by transfer matrices applied at s = s i ( ) x x = M(s s i ) Focusing: Defocusing: M F = ( ) 0 f ( ) 0 M D = f ( xi x i ) f > 0 f > 0 From TPD Problem 2 a), free space drift of length L has a transport matrix: ( ) L M 0 = 0 Consider a lattice of period 2L made up of equally spaced F and D lenses with eqaul values of f. a) Use the transfer matrix analysis developed in class to find the range of f for which the particle orbit is stable. b) Calculate cos σ 0 where σ 0 is the particle phase advance. c) For the case of f chosen to correspond to the stability limit, sketch the motion of a particle initial conditions: lim s s i x(s) = x 0 lim x (s) = x o /L s s i where s = s i is the axial location of a focusing thin lens kick, and s s i is just before the kick. Sketch the particle orbit for focusing strength slightly larger than the stability limit. Superimpose the orbit sketch on a diagram of the lattice (see below):

2