GRAPE A Balloon-Borne Gamma-Ray Polarimeter

Similar documents
Development of a Dedicated Hard X-Ray Polarimeter Mark L. McConnell, James R. Ledoux, John R. Macri, and James M. Ryan

Development of a Hard X-Ray Polarimeter for Solar Flares and Gamma-Ray Bursts

Status and Future Prospects for Υ-Ray Polarimetry

Developing a Compton Polarimeter to Measure Polarization of Hard X-Rays in the kev Energy Range

Plans for the first balloon flight of the gamma-ray polarimeter experiment (GRAPE)

GRAPE: a balloon-borne gamma-ray polarimeter

Plans for the next GRAPE balloon flight

GRB Polarimetry with POLAR. Merlin Kole

Dual Isotope Imaging with LaBr3:Ce Crystal and H8500 PSPMT

Development of a 3D-Imaging Calorimeter in LaBr 3 for Gamma-Ray Space Astronomy

H. Hofer, C. Lechanoine-Leluc, S. Orsi, M. Pohl, D. Rapin, E.Suarez-Garcia

Using BATSE to Measure. Gamma-Ray Burst Polarization. M. McConnell, D. Forrest, W.T. Vestrand and M. Finger y

RHESSI Solar Flare Polarimetry

Hard x-ray polarimeter for gamma-ray bursts and solar flares

Gamma Ray Burst Polarimeter POLAR

Hard X-ray Polarimeter for Small Satellite: Design, Feasibility Study, and Ground Experiments

Large-Area Balloon-Borne Polarized Gamma Ray Observer (PoGO)

CASTER A Scintillator-Based Black Hole Finder Probe

Polarimeter for Small Satellite Design, Feasibility Study, and Ground Experiments + Balloon Experiment

A NEW GENERATION OF GAMMA-RAY TELESCOPE

Calibration of the Gamma-RAy Polarimeter Experiment (GRAPE) at a Polarized Hard X-Ray Beam

First Results of POLAR: A dedicated Gamma-Ray Burst Polarimeter

1 Gamma-Ray Burst Polarimeter GAP aboard

Non-thermal emission from pulsars experimental status and prospects

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 26 Sep 2003

Detector R&D in KAPAC

E. Caroli(1), R. M. Curado da Silva(2), J.B. Stephen(1), F. Frontera(1,3), A. Pisa (3), S. Del Sordo (4)

Recent advances and future perspectives of gamma imagers for scintimammography

High Energy Polarimetry Missons in Japan; PoGOLite, SPHiNX, PolariS

José Antonio Briz Monago, M. Carmona-Gallardo and. M.J.G. Borge, A. Perea, O. Tengblad, M. Turrión

Large-Area Balloon-Borne Polarized Gamma Ray Observer (PoGO)

Beam Test of a Prototype Detector Array for the PoGO Astronomical Hard X-Ray/Soft Gamma-Ray Polarimeter

Motivation Electron-Tracking Compton Telescope 1 st Flight of SMILE Preparation for next step summary

PoS(INTEGRAL 2010)107

POLAR: an Instrument to measure Gamma Ray Bursts Polarisation

POLAR: an Instrument to measure Gamma Ray Bursts Polarisation

Balloon-borne experiment for observation of sub-mev/mev gamma-rays from Crab Nebula using an Electron Tracking Compton Camera

Detector R&D at KIPAC

AGIS (Advanced Gamma-ray Imaging System)

Recent laboratory tests of a hard x-ray solar flare polarimeter

Study of the HARPO TPC for a high angular resolution g-ray polarimeter in the MeV-GeV energy range. David Attié (CEA/Irfu)

POET: POlarimeters for Energetic Transients

1. Motivation & Detector concept 2. Performance 3. Confirmation experiments 4. Summary

Balloon-Borne Gamma-Ray Polarimeter (PoGO) to study Black Holes, Pulsars, and AGN. Jets: Design and Calibration. Zachary Apte

A RICH Photon Detector Module with G-APDs

Deliverable D10.1. WP10 JRA04 Innovative solutions for nuclear physics detectors

Liquid Argon TPC for Next Generation of MeV Gamma-ray Satellite

Motivation Electron-Tracking Compton Telescope 1 st Flight of SMILE Preparation for next step summary

II. 5. Study for NaI(Tl) and Scintillation Fiber with 80 MeV Proton Beam Toward ESPRI Experiment at NIRS-HIMAC, RIKEN-RIBF

1 Introduction. KOPIO charged-particle vetos. K - RARE Meeting (Frascati) May Purpose of CPV: veto Kl

SCI-O11. Design of a Compton Spectrometer Experiment for Studying Electron Response of a Scintillator

PoS(Extremesky 2011)067

Compton suppression spectrometry

Time of Flight measurements with MCP-PMT

Simulation of Radiation Monitors for Future Space Missions

Design of a Lanthanum Bromide Detector for TOF PET

PoS(TIPP2014)033. Upgrade of MEG Liquid Xenon Calorimeter. Ryu SAWADA. ICEPP, the University of Tokyo

The Silicon-Tungsten Tracker of the DAMPE Mission

PoGOLite, PoGO+, SPHiNX High-Energy Polarimetry Missions between Japan and Sweden

The Large Area Telescope on-board of the Fermi Gamma-Ray Space Telescope Mission

STATUS OF ATLAS TILE CALORIMETER AND STUDY OF MUON INTERACTIONS. 1 Brief Description of the ATLAS Tile Calorimeter

V. 3. Development of an Accelerator Beam Loss Monitor Using an Optical Fiber

Measurements of liquid xenon s response to low-energy particle interactions

PoS(KAON09)023. Beam Hole Photon Veto For J-PARC K O TO experiment. Yosuke Maeda Kyoto University

Detector R&D at KIPAC. Hiro Tajima Kavli InStitute of Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology

1 Introduction STATUS OF THE GLAST LARGE AREA TELESCOPE. SLAC-PUB December Richard Dubois. Abstract

Alpha-Gamma discrimination by Pulse Shape in LaBr 3 :Ce and LaCl 3 :Ce

Introduction Polarimeters at MAMI Analysis Future Conclusion. Polarimetry at MAMI. V. Tyukin, Inst. of Nuclear Physics, Mainz, Germany

The MEGA Project. Key words: gamma-ray astronomy, medium energies, MEGA PACS: K

Tests of the BURLE 64-anode MCP PMT as the detector of Cherenkov photons

X ray Imaging Android [XIA]

Simulation study of scintillatorbased

Gamma-Ray Polarimetry in the Pair Production Regime

for the HARPO Collaboration: *

A novel design of the MeV gamma-ray imaging detector with Micro-TPC

Timing and Energy Response of Six Prototype Scintillators

SciBar and future K2K physics. F.Sánchez Universitat Aútonoma de Barcelona Institut de Física d'altes Energies

Development of a High Precision Axial 3-D PET for Brain Imaging

Addendum to the ISOLDE and Neutron Time-of-Flight Committee

The Compton Effect. Martha Buckley MIT Department of Physics, Cambridge, MA (Dated: November 26, 2002)

GLAST Large Area Telescope:

Detectors for 20 kev 10 MeV

LaBr 3 (Ce) detector and PMT tests at IPN Orsay

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 16 May 2017

Radioactivity. Lecture 6 Detectors and Instrumentation

CHIPP Plenary Meeting University of Geneva, June 12, 2008 W. Lustermann on behalf of the AX PET Collaboration

E166: Polarized Positrons & Polarimetry

GLAST LAT Overview and Status

Gamma-Rays and Blowfish. What are we doing? Why are we doing it? How are we doing it?

Scintillator gamma-ray detectors with silicon photomultiplier readouts for high-energy astronomy

Ultra High Quantum Efficiency PMT for energy resolution measurements of LaBr 3 (Ce) scintillation crystals

Preliminary results from gamma-ray observations with the CALorimeteric Electron Telescope (CALET)

The MoNA-LISA Detector Array

David Gascón. Daniel Peralta. Universitat de Barcelona, ECM department. E Diagonal 647 (Barcelona) IFAE, Universitat Aut onoma de Barcelona

The Mini-Calorimeter for the AGILE satellite

Dark Matter Particle Explorer: The First Chinese Cosmic Ray and Hard γ-ray Detector in Space

Studies of Hadron Calorimeter

Tracking and imaging gamma ray experiment (TIGRE) for 1 to 100 MEV gamma ray astronomy

A Prototype of LaBr3:Ce in situ Gamma-Ray Spectrometer for Marine Environmental Monitoring

Xenon Compton Telescopes at Columbia: the post LXeGRIT phase. E.Aprile. Columbia University

Transcription:

GRAPE A Balloon-Borne Gamma-Ray Polarimeter (5-3 kev) Mark L. McConnell, James R. Ledoux, John R. Macri, Matt Orr, and James M. Ryan Space Science Center University of New Hampshire Durham, NH X-Ray Polarimetry Workshop SLAC / Stanford 9-11 February 24

GRAPE Science Model (SM1) Gamma-RAy Polarimeter Experiment Scattering Elements 28 element array of plastic each 5 mm square by 5 cm long optically isolated read out by a 5-inch PSPMT Hamamatsu R3292 PSMT Calorimeter Elements 4 element array of CsI(Tl) each 1cm square by 5 cm long read out by a MAPMT Hamamatsu R59 MAPMT CsI(Tl) Array Plastic Elements BC-44 Position-Sensitive PMT Hamamatsu R3292

On-Axis Performance Effective Area (cm 2 ) 4 3 2 1 Effective Area vs. Depth 11.6 mm 88.9 mm 76.2 mm 63.5 mm 5.8 mm 25.4 mm 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 Energy (kev) 2 3 4 5 Simulations (based on a modified version of GEANT3) have been used to characterize the design.

On-Axis Performance Figure of Merit (relative) 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Figure-of-Merit vs. Depth 76.2 mm 5.8 mm 25.4 mm 63.5 mm 88.9 mm 11.6 mm The figure-of-merit incorporates an estimate of the increased background as a function of detector volume. FoM = µ 1 ɛa Vdet 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 Energy (kev) Optimum Depth for this design is ~3 inches

Off-Axis Performance 7.62 cm depth @ 2 kev 1. 3. Modulation Factor.8.6.4.2. Modulation Factor Effective Area 1 2 3 4 Angle (Degs) 5 6 7 2.5 2. 1.5 1..5. Effective Area (cm 2 ) The GRAPE design offers significant response even at large off-axis angles. This makes GRAPE an attractive design for polarization studies of transient sources (Gamma-Ray Bursts).

Science Model Components This photo shows the 5-inch PSPMT, the array of plastic scattering elements and the MAPMT/CsI assembly.

GRAPE SM1 Lab Set-Up (drawing not to scale) POLARIZER POLARIMETER PMT 288 kev, partially polarized MAPMT PSPMT 662 kev, unpolarized 137 Cs CsI array plastic scintillator array Polarization Fraction.8.6.4.2. 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 Scatter Angle (degs) 6 kev 662 kev 12 kev 16 18 Photons partially polarized by scattering off a plastic scintillator. Also provides electronic tagging of each photon.

Correction of SM1 Data 1.4 1.2 GRAPE - SM1 14 12 GRAPE - SM1 1. 1 Counts.8.6 Counts 8 6.4.2. Unpolarized Data (normalized) 5 1 15 2 25 356 kev 3 35 4 2 Polarized Data (raw data) 5 1 15 2 288 kev 25 3 35 Azimuthal Scatter Angle (degs) Azimuthal Scatter Angle (degs) The response to an unpolarized beam is used to correct for geometric effects. Counts 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 Polarized Data (corrected) 5 1 15 2 GRAPE - SM1 25 3 35 Azimuthal Scatter Angle (degs)

SM1 Results at Incidence Runs taken with the incident beam having a polarization angle that differs by ~9. 1 7 Corrected Counts 8 6 4 2 GRAPE Science Model (SM1) Incidence φ = 4 ± 2 Corrected Counts 6 5 4 3 2 1 GRAPE Science Model (SM1) Incidence φ = 134 ± 3 6 12 18 24 3 36 6 12 18 24 3 Azimuthal Scatter Angle (degs) Azimuthal Scatter Angle (degs) Polarization = 62 (±3)% Polarization = 73 (±6)% 36

SM1 Results at 3 Incidence Runs taken with the incident beam having a polarization angle that differs by ~9. Corrected Counts 14 12 1 8 6 4 GRAPE Science Model (SM1) 3 Incidence φ = Corrected Counts 12 1 8 6 4 GRAPE Science Model (SM1) 3 Incidence φ = 9 2 2 5 1 15 2 25 3 Azimuthal Scatter Angle (degs) 35 5 1 15 2 25 3 Azimuthal Scatter Angle (degs) 35 Polarization = 63 (±4)% Polarization = 73 (±7)%

GRB Sensitivity We have estimated the polarization sensitivity of a longduration balloon payload consisting of a planar array of 36 GRAPE modules, covering less than 1 m2 of area. Frequency based on BATSE 4B catalog.

Solar Flare Sensitivity The solar flare polarization sensitivity for various energy bands. These data assume a balloon-borne array of 16 GRAPE modules. 3 Minimum Detectable Polarization (%) 25 2 15 1 5 X1-Class Flare X1-Class Flare 1 2 3 4 Energy (kev) 5 6

GRAPE Science Model (SM2) Gamma-RAy Polarimeter Experiment Scattering Elements 6 element array of plastic each 5-mm square by 5-cm long optically isolated read out by a flat-panel MAPMT Hamamatsu H85 MAPMT Calorimeter Elements 4 element array of CsI(Tl) each 5-mm square by 5-cm long read out by same flat-panel MAPMT Hamamatsu H85 MAPMT CsI plastic elements flat-panel PMT FEE Single module with MAPMT and FEE electronics.

SM2 Module Logic plastic scintillator bars (photon scattering) inorganic scintillator (CsI or LaBr 3, calorimeter) or from other MAPMTs or coincidence Text gate The single MAPMT provides independent signals for both the scattering and calorimeter elements. flat panel MAPMT pulse heights & hit IDs front-end electronics ADCs event builder sparse event data Eliminates additional mass in front for calorimeter readout.

Large Area Arrays Large area arrays can easily be fabricated. Inter-module events will increase the effective area. Large areas could be used as an imaging detector plane.

Lab Testing of SM2 Module Now in Progress The H85 provides an 8 x 8 array of anodes on a 6-mm pitch.

SM1 vs. SM2 Array Effective Area (cm 2 ) 3.5 3. 2.5 2. 1.5 1..5 Effective Area SM1 vs. SM2 Array SM1 (PSPMT) SM2 (MAPMT) Modulation Factor (µ 1 ) 1..8.6.4.2 Modulation Factor SM1 vs. SM2 Array SM1 (PSPMT) SM2 (MAPMT).3 4 5 6 7 2 3 4 5 6 7 2 1 1 Energy (kev).3 4 5 6 7 2 3 4 5 6 7 2 1 1 Energy (kev) These simulation results compare a single SM1 module with a 4-element array of SM2 modules.

SM1 vs. SM2 Array Figure of Merit 1 8 6 4 2 Figure of Merit SM1 vs. SM2 Array 3 4 5 6 7 2 3 4 5 6 7 2 1 1 Energy (kev) SM1 (PSPMT) SM2 (MAPMT) Despite the lower modulation factor, the FoM of the SM2 array exceeds that of the SM1 module. The SM2 array provides : ~25% greater sensitivity ~3% smaller footprint ~75% smaller volume close-packing

LaBr 3 Scintillator Another important advance, in terms of energy resolution, will come from the use of Lanthanum Bromide in place of the CsI. Counts 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 GRAPE Energy Resolution (simulated) LaBr 3 ( E/E = 9.5%) CsI ( E/E = 25%) 5 1 15 2 Total Energy Loss (kev)

Project Status First science model successfully tested. Now testing an improved design based on flat panel multi-anode PMT. Engineering balloon flight of SM2 array in 26. Development of a full balloon payload for ULDB...... a bunch of GRAPEs