P1M.4 COUPLED ATMOSPHERE, LAND-SURFACE, HYDROLOGY, OCEAN-WAVE, AND OCEAN-CURRENT MODELS FOR MESOSCALE WATER AND ENERGY CIRCULATIONS

Similar documents
Development of Coupled Modeling System for Regional Water Cycle and Material Transport in the Atmospheric, Terrestrial, and Oceanic Environment

Numerical Simulation System for Environmental Studies: SPEEDI-MP

5. General Circulation Models

Precipitation Structure and Processes of Typhoon Nari (2001): A Modeling Propsective

THE INFLUENCE OF HIGHLY RESOLVED SEA SURFACE TEMPERATURES ON METEOROLOGICAL SIMULATIONS OFF THE SOUTHEAST US COAST

Land Surface Processes and Their Impact in Weather Forecasting

LARGE-SCALE WRF-SIMULATED PROXY ATMOSPHERIC PROFILE DATASETS USED TO SUPPORT GOES-R RESEARCH ACTIVITIES

HWRF Ocean: MPIPOM-TC

Creating Meteorology for CMAQ

The Fifth-Generation NCAR / Penn State Mesoscale Model (MM5) Mark Decker Feiqin Xie ATMO 595E November 23, 2004 Department of Atmospheric Science

Development and Validation of Polar WRF

Atmospheric Processes

Meteorological Modeling using Penn State/NCAR 5 th Generation Mesoscale Model (MM5)

A New Ocean Mixed-Layer Model Coupled into WRF

RAL Advances in Land Surface Modeling Part I. Andrea Hahmann

DSJRA-55 Product Users Handbook. Climate Prediction Division Global Environment and Marine Department Japan Meteorological Agency July 2017

Weather Research and Forecasting Model. Melissa Goering Glen Sampson ATMO 595E November 18, 2004

NCEP non-hydrostatic regional model and surface scheme LAPS: A dynamical scaling tool for use in agricultural models

Incorporation of 3D Shortwave Radiative Effects within the Weather Research and Forecasting Model

Polar WRF. Polar Meteorology Group Byrd Polar and Climate Research Center The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio

Development of Ocean and Coastal Prediction Systems

FORECASTING MESOSCALE PRECIPITATION USING THE MM5 MODEL WITH THE FOUR-DIMENSIONAL DATA ASSIMILATION (FDDA) TECHNIQUE

Impact of different cumulus parameterizations on the numerical simulation of rain over southern China

Investigation of feedback mechanisms between soil moisture, land use and precipitation in West Africa

The PRECIS Regional Climate Model

Polar COAWST. Coupled Atmosphere (Land) Ocean Sea Ice Wave Sediment Transport Modeling System for Polar Regions

9.4 CLASSIFYING PRECIPITATION EVENTS IN THE FERTILE CRESCENT. Jason P. Evans * and Ronald B. Smith Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, U.S.A.

Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES) CU-Boulder 2. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

Wind Flow Modeling The Basis for Resource Assessment and Wind Power Forecasting

TOVS and the MM5 analysis over Portugal

Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio

HWRF Ocean: The Princeton Ocean Model. HWRF Tutorial NCWCP, College Park, MD January 2018

8.3 A STUDY OF AIR-SEA INTERACTIONS AND ASSOCIATED TROPICAL HURRICANE ACTIVITY OVER GULF OF MEXICO USING SATELLITE DATA AND NUMERICAL MODELING

INVESTIGATION FOR A POSSIBLE INFLUENCE OF IOANNINA AND METSOVO LAKES (EPIRUS, NW GREECE), ON PRECIPITATION, DURING THE WARM PERIOD OF THE YEAR

STORM SURGE SIMULATION IN NAGASAKI DURING THE PASSAGE OF 2012 TYPHOON SANBA

ESCI 344 Tropical Meteorology Lesson 7 Temperature, Clouds, and Rain

Richard M. Yablonsky University of Rhode Island. WRF for Hurricanes Tutorial Boulder, CO 25 February 2010

Global Water Cycle. Surface (ocean and land): source of water vapor to the atmosphere. Net Water Vapour Flux Transport 40.

11 days (00, 12 UTC) 132 hours (06, 18 UTC) One unperturbed control forecast and 26 perturbed ensemble members. --

Water Balance in the Murray-Darling Basin and the recent drought as modelled with WRF

Ocean Model Development for COAMPS

WRF Modeling System Overview

11A.6 ON THE ROLE OF ATMOSPHERIC DATA ASSIMILATION AND MODEL RESOLUTION ON MODEL FORECAST ACCURACY FOR THE TORINO WINTER OLYMPICS

Mesoscale predictability under various synoptic regimes

The Community Noah LSM with Multi-physics Options

An Introduction to Physical Parameterization Techniques Used in Atmospheric Models

Egyptian Meteorological Authority Cairo Numerical Weather prediction centre

5.6 IMPACT OF THREE DIMENSIONAL DATA ASSIMILATION ON HIGH RESOLUTION WEATHER AND POLLUTION FORECASTING IN THE LOS ANGELES BASIN

Improved rainfall and cloud-radiation interaction with Betts-Miller-Janjic cumulus scheme in the tropics

A Numerical Study of a TOGA-COARE Squall-Line Using a Coupled Mesoscale Atmosphere-Ocean Model

Numerical Experiment Research of a Marine Fog Event in the Pearl River Estuary Region

Climate Modeling and Downscaling

A New Typhoon Bogus Data Assimilation and its Sampling Method: A Case Study

14.4 NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF AIR POLLUTION OVER KANTO AREA IN JAPAN USING THE MM5/CMAQ MODEL

NCEP Land-Surface Modeling

Impact of vegetation cover estimates on regional climate forecasts

Supplementary Material

The Effect of Sea Spray on Tropical Cyclone Intensity

Assimilation of satellite derived soil moisture for weather forecasting

Atmospheric rivers induced heavy precipitation and flooding in the western U.S. simulated by the WRF regional climate model

Sensitivity of precipitation forecasts to cumulus parameterizations in Catalonia (NE Spain)

Regional Warming Related with Land Use Change during Past 135 Years in Japan

NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF A BAY OF BENGAL TROPICAL CYCLONE: A COMPARISON OF THE RESULTS FROM EXPERIMENTS WITH JRA-25 AND NCEP REANALYSIS FIELDS

Advanced Hurricane WRF (AHW) Physics

Maximization of Historical Severe Precipitation Events over American, Yuba and Feather River Basins

Climate and the Atmosphere

WRF Modeling System Overview

ABSTRACT 2 DATA 1 INTRODUCTION

Benchmarking Polar WRF in the Antarctic *

An analysis of Wintertime Cold-Air Pool in Armenia Using Climatological Observations and WRF Model Data

Simulation of storm surge and overland flows using geographical information system applications

1. Current atmospheric DA systems 2. Coupling surface/atmospheric DA 3. Trends & ideas

Model description of AGCM5 of GFD-Dennou-Club edition. SWAMP project, GFD-Dennou-Club

A SATELLITE LAND DATA ASSIMILATION SYTEM COUPLED WITH A MESOSCALE MODEL: TOWARDS IMPROVING NUMERICAL WEATHER PREDICTION

Arctic Boundary Layer

MxVision WeatherSentry Web Services Content Guide

Status of Atmospheric Winds in Relation to Infrasound. Douglas P. Drob Space Science Division Naval Research Laboratory Washington, DC 20375

WQMAP (Water Quality Mapping and Analysis Program) is a proprietary. modeling system developed by Applied Science Associates, Inc.

608 SENSITIVITY OF TYPHOON PARMA TO VARIOUS WRF MODEL CONFIGURATIONS

Warm weather s a comin!

Simulation studies for Lake Taihu effect on local meteorological environment. Ren Xia

ABSTRACT 3 RADIAL VELOCITY ASSIMILATION IN BJRUC 3.1 ASSIMILATION STRATEGY OF RADIAL

1. CLIMATOLOGY: 2. ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY:

Assessment of the Noah LSM with Multi-parameterization Options (Noah-MP) within WRF

The applicability of Monin Obukhov scaling for sloped cooled flows in the context of Boundary Layer parameterization

Modeling rainfall diurnal variation of the North American monsoon core using different spatial resolutions

IMPACT OF SOIL FREEZING ON THE CONTINENTAL-SCALE SEASONAL CYCLE SIMULATED BY A GENERAL CIRCULATION MODEL

Impact of ATOVS data in a mesoscale assimilationforecast system over the Indian region

A Quick Report on a Dynamical Downscaling Simulation over China Using the Nested Model

The next-generation supercomputer and NWP system of the JMA

DOWNSLOPE WINDSTORM IN ICELAND WRF/MM5 MODEL COMPARISON-I

Uncertainties in planetary boundary layer schemes and current status of urban boundary layer simulations at OU

Atmospheric Moisture, Precipitation, and Weather Systems

QUANTITATIVE VERIFICATION STATISTICS OF WRF PREDICTIONS OVER THE MEDITERRANEAN REGION

Evaluation of MM5 Simulations With HTSVS With and Without Inclusion of Soil-Frost Parameterization

Mesoscale meteorological models. Claire L. Vincent, Caroline Draxl and Joakim R. Nielsen

Chapter 3 DEVELOPING METEOROLOGICAL FIELDS

Land Data Assimilation at NCEP NLDAS Project Overview, ECMWF HEPEX 2004

Thermal / Solar. When air is warmed it... Rises. Solar Energy. Evaporation. Condensation Forms Clouds

An Introduction to Coupled Models of the Atmosphere Ocean System

Transcription:

P1M.4 COUPLED ATMOSPHERE, LAND-SURFACE, HYDROLOGY, OCEAN-WAVE, AND OCEAN-CURRENT MODELS FOR MESOSCALE WATER AND ENERGY CIRCULATIONS Haruyasu NAGAI *, Takuya KOBAYASHI, Katsunori TSUDUKI, and Kyeongok KIM Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute, Tokai, Ibaraki, Japan 1. INTRODUCTION Coupled model system was developed to simulate mesoscale water and energy circulations, and test calculations were carried out for the coastal circulations around the Red Sea. The coupled model system consists of the atmosphere, land-surface, hydrology, ocean-wave, and ocean-current models. The models used in this system are the non-hydrostatic atmospheric dynamic model of Pennsylvania State University and National Center for Atmospheric Research (PSU/NCAR-MM5; Grell et al. 1994), detailed multi-layer land surface model (SOLVEG; Nagai 2002, 2003, 2005) and three-dimensional hydrology model (RIVERS; Tsuduki 2003) developed at Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute (JAERI), the third-generation ocean wind-wave model of NOAA, WAVEWATCH III (WW3; Tolman 2002), and the Princeton Ocean Model (POM; Mellor 1998). In this coupled model system, calculations of the models are carried out as independent parallel processes and a model coupling program (model coupler) controls these processes and data exchanges among models using Message Passing Interface (MPI). This coupling method is very convenient for the construction of this kind of complicated coupled model. The modifications of models are easy, simply adding some modules for data exchanges to each model code without changing each model s original structure. This feature is helpful to make a model code coupling with a community model like MM5, which is updated regularly. Moreover, this coupling is flexible and allows the use of Corresponding author address: Haruyasu Nagai, Department of Environmental Sciences, Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute, 2-4 Shirakata-shirane, Tokai, Ibaraki 319-1195 Japan; E-mail: nagai@sakura.tokai.jaeri.go.jp independent time step and grid resolution for each model. In this paper, the coupled model system and preliminary results of test calculations are described. 2. OVERVIEW OF MODELS The non-hydrostatic mesoscale atmospheric model MM5 (Grell et al. 1994) is a community model having many users all over the world, and is used for many purposes, even for the official weather forecast by some countries. It has many useful functions such as nesting calculations, four-dimensional data assimilation, and many options of parameterizations for cloud micro-physics, cumulus cloud, planetary boundary layer (PBL), radiation, and land surface scheme. The land surface model SOLVEG (Nagai 2002, 2003, 2005) consists of one-dimensional multi-layer sub-models for the surface atmosphere, soil, and vegetation, and a radiation scheme for the transmission of solar and long-wave radiation in the canopy. It simulates diurnal variations and seasonal changes of variables in the surface atmosphere, soil, and vegetation canopy, and exchanges of energy and water among these systems, by using meteorological data of the surface layer atmosphere as the top boundary conditions. For coupling with an atmospheric model, one-dimensional model variables are expanded to three-dimensional ones whose horizontal coordinates coincide with those of atmospheric model. However, no interactions in horizontal directions are considered in the model. The hydrology model RIVERS (Tsuduki 2003) is a grid type distributed runoff model. It consists of three-dimensional grid cells with five vertical layers and river channels. Horizontal and vertical water flows

among connected grid cells and river channels are calculated from the GIS data (elevation, land-use, soil-type, etc.), and the water content of each grid cell is determined to keep the mass balance. The ocean-wave model WW3 (Tolman 2002) is known as third-generation wave model that is phase-averaged and stochastic. It simulates temporal and spatial variations of wave growth and decay resulting from the surface wind force, dissipation due to white-capping, and the bottom friction on the water column. The Princeton Ocean Model POM (Mellor 1998) is a three-dimensional primitive equation model, incorporating a turbulence closure model (Mellor and Yamada 1982) to provide a parameterization of the vertical mixing processes. It calculates the three components of current velocity, salinity, temperature, turbulence kinetic energy, turbulence length scale, and free surface elevation as prognostic variables. It uses a terrain-following sigma coordinate and suitable for the coastal region. 3. MODEL COUPLING 3.1 Coupling method In this coupling, calculations of five models (MM5, SOLVEG, RIVERS, WW3, and POM) are carried out as independent tasks for different processors and a model coupling program (model coupler) controls these processes and data exchanges among models using Message Passing Interface (MPI) as schematically shown in Fig. 1. This type of parallel calculation is called Multiple Program Multiple Data (MPMD). The model coupler starts at first, and it invokes and controls calculation processes and MPI communicators of five models. It receives 2D or 3D-field data from a certain model and distributes them to other models in arbitrary time intervals, which are prescribed in data exchange setting files for coupled models. If model grids are different between sender and receiver models, the model coupler interpolates 2D or 3D-field data from a sender model on the grid of a receiver model. Therefore, this coupling has flexibility to use different resolution of grid and time step for each model. This coupling is also applicable to the nesting domain calculation, which is the important function used in MM5. Moreover, data exchanges can be cut off and any combinations of models are easily established, for example MM5 SOLVEG RIVERS, MM5 WW3 POM, etc. The modification of each model code for this coupling is simple and easy, just adding some data exchange routines and put some sentences in the original model code which call the coupling routines, and each model code keeps its original MM5: Surface pressure, Rain, Evaporation, Heat flux, Radiation POM: Surface temp. MM5: Surface wind WW3: Roughness Atmosphere MM5 MM5: Radiation, Rain, Wind, Temp., Humidity, Pressure SOLVEG: Skin temp., Albedo, Momentum flux, Heat flux, Moisture flux WW3: Wave breaking stress, Surface wind stress POM: Water elevation, Current Ocean-wave WW3 Ocean-current POM Model coupler RIVERS: River flow Land-surface SOLVEG Hydrology RIVERS SOLVEG: Soil & sfc. water, Drainage, Root-uptake, Rain & evap. on river RIVERS: Soil & sfc. water change, Deep soil water, Up-flow water Fig. 1 Data exchanges and interactions among coupled models. Red arrows represent data exchanges via MPI controlled by the model coupler, and blue arrows are interactions among models, respectively. Interactions written in blue letters are planned to be included.

structure. 3.2 Interactions among models Interactions considered in this coupled model system are briefly described here. As shown in Fig. 1, interactions are divided largely into two parts; the atmosphere-ocean and atmosphere-land. For both parts, interactions occur through the sea or land-surface, and WW3 or SOLVEG play the interface between the atmosphere and ocean or land. For the ocean part, the momentum exchanges in the wind-wave-current system are schematically illustrated in Fig. 2. The surface wind from MM5 provides the wind stresses; the wave-induced stress (τ wave) and turbulence-induced stress (τ t) to generate wind-wave in WW3, and the surface stress (τ surface) to generate current in POM. For the wave calculation in WW3, the surface current (u, v) and water elevation (η), which are provided from POM, are necessary as well as the wind stress. Calculated wind breaking stress (τ break) and surface roughness length (z 0) are offered to POM and MM5, respectively. POM calculates the surface current using the wind stress (τ surface) from MM5 and wave MM5 Atmosphere: u, v, T, q, Rs, Ri, Rain, Ps Surface B. C. z 0 τ + τ wave t τ break η, uv, MPI τ surface Fig. 2 Interactions in the wind-wave-current system. SOLVEG Upper B. C. Land-surface: Ts, albedo, u*, H, E Fig. 3 Data exchanges between MM5 and SOLVEG. SOLVEG Transpiration Precipitation Evaporation Surface & soil water content Vertical movement MPI RIVERS River Surface layer Surface soil layer Horizontal movement Deep soil layers Vertical water transport in liquid and gas phases 3 D water flow based on GIS information Fig. 4 Calculated water movements in the land-surface model SOLVEG and hydrology model RIVERS and data exchanges. Light blue and blue arrows represent water movements calculated by SOLVEG and RIVERS, respectively.

breaking stress (τ break) from WW3. It also simulates surface water elevation (η) using sea surface pressure from MM5, and this output together with the surface current (u, v) are provided to WW3. Although the energy and water exchanges are also considered in the atmosphere-ocean interaction, only the sea surface temperature by POM is provided to MM5 as the surface boundary condition. For the land part, the momentum, energy, and water exchanges between the atmosphere and land-surface are considered completely, while only the water exchange is treated in the interaction between the land-surface and hydrology. Figure 3 shows the date exchange between the atmosphere model MM5 and land-surface model SOLVEG. MM5 sends the surface layer variables: air pressure (Ps), radiation (solar: Rs, long-wave: Ri), precipitation (Rain), wind speed (u, v), temperature (T), humidity (q), to SOLVEG at every time steps. With these inputs, SOLVEG calculation proceeds for the same time interval as MM5 and sends its results to MM5: skin temperature (Ts), albedo, momentum flux (u*), heat flux (H), and vapor flux (E). MM5 receives these values in the next time step and uses them as the surface boundary condition in the PBL process. The time step of SOLVEG calculation is usually smaller than that of MM5, and several time steps are carried out for SOLVEG calculation during a single time step of MM5 calculation. The data exchanges between the land-surface and hydrology are shown in Fig. 4. The land-surface model SOLVEG provides detailed calculations of surface water content, near-surface soil water content, and vertical fluxes of soil water to the hydrology model RIVERS. With these inputs, RIVERS calculates the river flow, deep layer soil water content, and three-dimensional movement of soil water, and the changes due to horizontal water movements are fed back to SOLVEG. These exchanges enable SOLVEG to consider the horizontal movement of soil water, which is not simulated in vertical one-dimensional calculations. 4. TEST CALCULATIONS Test calculations were carried out to examine the performance of this coupled model system. Target area is the seacoast desert of west Saudi Arabia. This coupled model system is planed to be applied for studies related to the greening project of this area. A heavy rainfall occurred on 22 January 2005, and flash floods caused significant damages in this area. This event was chosen for test calculations. Calculation domains of MM5 are shown in Fig. 5 as the land-use map. Two-domain nesting is used and the other models are coupled with the inner domain of MM5. NCEP/NCAR reanalysis data (provided by the NOAA-CIRES Climate Diagnostics Center, Boulder, Colorado, USA, from the Web site at http://www.cdc.noaa.gov/) was used for the MM5 input. This dataset contains necessary inputs for SOLVEG and RIVERS as well as MM5. For the ocean part, only the Red Sea is calculated and the climatological data are used as the initial inputs. 4.1 Calculation conditions Domain 2 Domain 1 Fig. 5 Land-use map of MM5 calculation domains. Dominant land-use categories are the desert (orange), short vegetation (light green), and tall vegetation (deep green). Input data and model settings are as follows. Input data: - NCEP/NCAR Reanalysis - Resolution 2.5 2.5, 17 pressure levels - Interval 6 hours (00, 06, 12, 18 UTC) - Period 4 days from 20 Jan. 2005 MM5: (parallel: 16 CPUs) Options:

- Cumulus Grell - Microphysics Reisner2 - Radiation Cloud - PBL MRF - LSM Noah-LSM (mother domain) MM5 mother domain: - Grid 100 100 23 - Resolution 45 km - Time increment 90 s MM5 inner domain: - Grid 100 130 23 - Resolution 15 km - Time increment 30 s SOLVEG: (parallel: 40 CPUs) - Horizontal grid 100 130 (MM5 inner domain) - Atmosphere 10 layers, 10 m above the canopy - Soil 6 layers, 1 m below the land surface - Vegetation Lower 5 layers of atmosphere - Time increment 5 s RIVERS: (single: 1 CPUs) - Horizontal grid 100 130 (MM5 inner domain) - Layers Surface + 4 soil layers + river - Time increment 5 s WW3: (parallel: 4 CPUs) - Grid 56 81 (horizontal grid of POM) - Resolution 22 km - Time increment 900 s POM: (single: 1CPUs) - Grid 56 81 11 - Resolution 22 km - Time increment 900 s Data exchanges: - MM5 SOLVEG 30 s - SOLVEG RIVERS 5 s - MM5 WW3 900 s - MM5 POM 900 s - WW3 POM 900 s SGI scalar-parallel computer Altix3900 was used to execute coupled calculations. Parallel calculations were used for MM5 (16 CPUs), SOLVEG (40 CPUs), and WW3 (4 CPUs). RIVERS and POM calculations were single. The model coupler uses 1 CPU and additional 1 CPU is necessary for MPI full-mode. Therefore, total number of used CPU was 64. The calculation by uncoupled MM5 and those of two different combinations of models, MM5 SOLVEG RIVERS and MM5 SOLVEG, were also carried out, and the impacts of interactions were examined. 4.2 Results For four-day calculation of this test case, it took about 3.0 hours by the five-model coupling using 64 CPUs. For the other combinations of models, it took about 1.3, 2.3 and 3.0 hours for the same case by the uncoupled MM5 using 16 CPUs, MM5-SOLVEG coupling using 58 CPUs, and MM5-SOLVEG-RIVERS coupling using 59 CPUs, respectively. For this case, calculation cost for SOLVEG is larger than MM5 and most CPUs are allocated to SOLVEG. However, the parallelization efficiency is not good for SOLVEG calculations, causing the increase of computation time. Frequent data exchanges between MM5 and SOLVEG (every 30 seconds) and those between SOLVEG and RIVERS (every 5 seconds) are also the reason for the increase of computation time. Concerning the ocean part, data exchanges are carried out in 900 seconds interval and times spent for these procedures are negligible. Parallelization scheme of SOLVEG and data exchanges among MM5, SOLVEG, and RIVERS need to be improved to achieve better computational load balance. Calculated rainfalls for the heavy rain period (12 hours from 12 UTC to 24 UTC on 22 January 2005) by the original MM5 and coupled models; MM5 SOLVEG, MM5 SOLVEG RIVERS, and all five models, are shown in Fig. 6. The rain pattern changed using the land surface boundary conditions by SOLVEG and POM. Especially, the sea surface temperature by POM affected the rain calculation in MM5 over the coastal area at the north-east part of the Red Sea. It is because that the sea surface temperature calculated by POM was higher than that used in the original MM5, which was constant given as the initial condition. The impact by the land hydrology calculation by RIVERS was almost negligible in this preliminary result. The horizontal movement of land water is not large enough to be recognized in this spatial and time scale. Calculations using higher resolution grid or longer period have to be carried out to examine the impacts by

(a) (b) (c) (d) Fig. 6 Calculated rainfalls for 12 hours from 12 UTC to 24 UTC on 22 January 2005 by (a) MM5, (b) MM5 SOLVEG coupling, (c) MM5 SOLVEG RIVERS coupling, and (d) MM5 SOLVEG RIVERS WW3 POM coupling.

the land water movement on the coupling calculations. Besides the higher resolution grid and longer periods, comparison with measured data will be also included in the next step. 5. SUMMARY Coupled model system was developed and test calculations were carried out for the coastal circulations around the Red Sea. The coupled model system consists of models for the atmosphere (MM5), land-surface (SOLVEG), hydrology (RIVERS), ocean-wave (WW3), and ocean-current (POM), and a model coupling program (model coupler) that controls calculations of these models and data exchanges. Calculations of models are carried out as independent parallel processes and data exchanges among models are handled by the model coupler using MPI. This coupling method is very useful to construct complicated coupled models, easy to modify each model code, and flexible to use independent time step and grid resolution for each model. Test calculations were carried out for the seacoast desert area of west Saudi Arabia to examine the performance of this coupled model system. Several combinations of models are tested to examine the computational costs and impacts by interactions among models. For the computational aspect, improvements are necessary for parallelization scheme of SOLVEG and data exchanges among MM5, SOLVEG, and RIVERS to achieve better computational load balance. For interactions among models, the sea surface temperature by POM affected much on the rain calculation in MM5, while the impact by the land hydrology calculation by RIVERS was almost negligible. The horizontal movement of land water is not large enough to be recognized in this spatial and time scale. The impact by land water calculations in the hydrology model on the coupling calculations should be examined by calculations with higher resolution grid or longer period in the next step. REFERENCES Blumberg, A. F., and G. L. Mellor, 1987: A description of a three-dimensional coastal ocean circulation model, In Three-Dimensional Coastal Ocean Model, N. S. Heaps (Ed.), 1-16, American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC. Grell, G. A., J. Dudhia, and D. R. Stauffer, 1994: A description of the fifth-generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5), NCAR Tech. Note, NCAR/TN-398+STR, 122pp. Mellor, G. L., 1998: Users guide for a three-dimensional, primitive equation, numerical ocean model, Princeton University, 40 pp. Mellor, G. L., and T. Yamada, 1982: Development of a turbulence closure model for geophysical fluid problems, Rev. Geophys. Space Phys., 20, 851-875. Nagai, H., 2002: Validation and sensitivity analysis of a new atmosphere-soil-vegetation model, J. Appl. Meteor., 41, 160-176. Nagai, H., 2003: Validation and sensitivity analysis of a new atmosphere-soil-vegetation model. Part II: Impacts on in-canopy latent heat flux over a winter wheat field determined by detailed calculation of canopy radiation transmission and stomatal resistance, J. Appl. Meteor., 42, 434-451. Nagai, H., 2005: Incorporation of CO 2 exchange processes into a multilayer atmosphere-soilvegetation model, J. Appl. Meteor., (in press). Tolman, H. L., 2002: User manual and system documentation of WAVWWATCH-III version 2.22, Tech. Note 222, NOAA/NWS/NCEP/OMB, 133 pp. Tsuduki, K., 2003: Development of a mathematical model to describe the transport of artificial radionuclides and trace elements in a river watershed, Section 4.1 in Consideration for modeling studies of migration of accidentally released radionuclides in a river watershed, T. Matsunaga, L. Monte, K. Tsuduki, N. Yanase, Y. Hanzawa, and T. Ueno, JAERI-Review 2003-039, Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute.