MSE: a «Velocity Machine» for Cosmology

Similar documents
A la découverte de Laniakea

Cosmology with Peculiar Velocity Surveys

Cosmicflows-2. Laniakea Supercluster

The motion of emptiness

WALLABY. Jeremy Mould WALLABY Science Meeting December 2, 2010

Survey of Astrophysics A110

Beyond BAO: Redshift-Space Anisotropy in the WFIRST Galaxy Redshift Survey

Fundamental cosmology from the galaxy distribution. John Peacock Hiroshima 1 Dec 2016

Baryon acoustic oscillations A standard ruler method to constrain dark energy

BAO and Lyman-α with BOSS

Chapter 9. Cosmic Structures. 9.1 Quantifying structures Introduction

LSS: Achievements & Goals. John Peacock Munich 20 July 2015

Physics of the Large Scale Structure. Pengjie Zhang. Department of Astronomy Shanghai Jiao Tong University

Signatures of MG on. linear scales. non- Fabian Schmidt MPA Garching. Lorentz Center Workshop, 7/15/14

Cosmology on the Beach: Experiment to Cosmology

Are VISTA/4MOST surveys interesting for cosmology? Chris Blake (Swinburne)

Source plane reconstruction of the giant gravitational arc in Abell 2667: a condidate Wolf-Rayet galaxy at z 1

Mario Santos (on behalf of the Cosmology SWG) Stockholm, August 24, 2015

Énergie noire Formation des structures. N. Regnault C. Yèche

Lecture 22: The expanding Universe. Astronomy 111 Wednesday November 15, 2017

Large Scale Structure with the Lyman-α Forest

Basic BAO methodology Pressure waves that propagate in the pre-recombination universe imprint a characteristic scale on

Crurent and Future Massive Redshift Surveys

More Galaxies. Scaling relations Extragalactic distances Luminosity functions Nuclear black holes

BAO from the DR14 QSO sample

Cosmology with high (z>1) redshift galaxy surveys

Redshift Space Distortion Introduction

Where do Luminous Red Galaxies form?

Modern Image Processing Techniques in Astronomical Sky Surveys

Cosmology with the ESA Euclid Mission

The Power. of the Galaxy Power Spectrum. Eric Linder 13 February 2012 WFIRST Meeting, Pasadena

Testing General Relativity with Redshift Surveys

Cosmic Tides. Ue-Li Pen, Ravi Sheth, Xuelei Chen, Zhigang Li CITA, ICTP, NAOC. October 23, Introduction Tides Cosmic Variance Summary

Testing gravity on Large Scales

Cosmological Constraints from Redshift Dependence of Galaxy Clustering Anisotropy

The flickering luminosity method

Morphology and Topology of the Large Scale Structure of the Universe

Observational Cosmology

LSST, Euclid, and WFIRST

Lecture Three: Observed Properties of Galaxies, contd.! Hubble Sequence. Environment! Globular Clusters in Milky Way. kpc

COSMOLOGY CURRENT SURVEYS AND INSTRUMENTATION MATTHEW COLLESS MULTI-OBJECT SPECTROSCOPY IN THE NEXT DECADE SANTA CRUZ DE LA PALMA

From quasars to dark energy Adventures with the clustering of luminous red galaxies

Constraining Dark Energy and Modified Gravity with the Kinetic SZ effect

Cosmic Web, IGM tomography and Clamato

Galaxy formation and evolution. Astro 850

Astronomy 330 Lecture Dec 2010

Galaxy Clusters in Stage 4 and Beyond

LARGE QUASAR GROUPS. Kevin Rahill Astrophysics

Some issues in cluster cosmology

The ultimate measurement of the CMB temperature anisotropy field UNVEILING THE CMB SKY

MApping the Most Massive Overdensity Through Hydrogen (MAMMOTH) Zheng Cai (UCSC)

BAO errors from past / future surveys. Reid et al. 2015, arxiv:

Cosmology. Introduction Geometry and expansion history (Cosmic Background Radiation) Growth Secondary anisotropies Large Scale Structure

PHY323:Lecture 7 Dark Matter with Gravitational Lensing

EUCLID Spectroscopy. Andrea Cimatti. & the EUCLID-NIS Team. University of Bologna Department of Astronomy

Mapping the Dark Matter in the Local Universe

Constraining Modified Gravity and Coupled Dark Energy with Future Observations Matteo Martinelli

2013: A Good Year for Cosmology A Brief History of Contemporary Cosmology

Techniques for measuring astronomical distances generally come in two variates, absolute and relative.

Lecture 30: Geometry & Expansion of the. Astronomy 101

Results from the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS)

Is there a hope of discovering new physics in the Euclid era? Francisco Prada Instituto de Física Teórica UAM-CSIC, Madrid IAA-CSIC, Granada

NeoClassical Probes. of the Dark Energy. Wayne Hu COSMO04 Toronto, September 2004

Galaxies and Cosmology

Galaxies. The majority of known galaxies fall into one of three major classes: spirals (78 %), ellipticals (18 %) and irregulars (4 %).

MILANO OAB: L. Guzzo, S. de la Torre,, E. Majerotto, U. Abbas (Turin), A. Iovino; MILANO IASF (data reduction center): B. Garilli, M. Scodeggio, D.

Galaxy Cluster Mergers

Cosmology and Dark Energy with the DEEP2 Galaxy Redshift Survey

BAO & RSD. Nikhil Padmanabhan Essential Cosmology for the Next Generation VII December 2017

The Early Universe John Peacock ESA Cosmic Vision Paris, Sept 2004

Modern Cosmology / Scott Dodelson Contents

Slipher, galaxies, and cosmic velocity fields

Cosmology in the Very Local Universe - Why Flow Models Matter

HI Galaxy Science with SKA1. Erwin de Blok (ASTRON, NL) on behalf of The HI Science Working Group

Large-Scale Structure

The Shape of Things to Come?

BAO analysis from the DR14 QSO sample

Present and future redshift survey David Schlegel, Berkeley Lab

Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Beyond: Galaxy Clustering as Dark Energy Probe

BAO & RSD. Nikhil Padmanabhan Essential Cosmology for the Next Generation December, 2017

Mapping large-scale structure with the Lyα forest

Cross-Correlation of Cosmic Shear and Extragalactic Gamma-ray Background

The State of Tension Between the CMB and LSS

Extended Tully- Fisher relations using HI stacking. Scott Meyer, Martin Meyer, Danail Obreschkow, Lister Staveley-Smith

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph] 7 Aug 2007

What Can We Learn from Galaxy Clustering 1: Why Galaxy Clustering is Useful for AGN Clustering. Alison Coil UCSD

CMB studies with Planck

Precision Cosmology from Redshift-space galaxy Clustering

Beyond ΛCDM: Dark energy vs Modified Gravity

Dark Energy. Cluster counts, weak lensing & Supernovae Ia all in one survey. Survey (DES)

Lecture 32: The Expanding Universe Readings: Sections 26-5 and 28-2

Euclid and MSE. Y. Mellier IAP and CEA/SAp.

An Introduction to the Dark Energy Survey

Hubble s Law and the Cosmic Distance Scale

Testing gravity on cosmological scales with the observed abundance of massive clusters

Mapping the z 2 Large-Scale Structure with 3D Lyα Forest Tomography

Infrared Mass-to-Light Profile Throughout the Infall Region of the Coma Cluster

Weak Gravitational Lensing

Constraints from Cosmological Data on Expansion and Growth of Structure in a Macroscopic Gravity Averaged Universe

Mapping the dark universe with cosmic magnification

Transcription:

Proposal: MSE: a «Velocity Machine» for Cosmology C. Schimd, S. de la Torre, E. Jullo, L. Tresse (LAM, Marseille), H. Courtois, Y. Copin (IPNL Lyon), T. Buchert, J. Richard (CRAL, Lyon), J.-P. Kneib (EPFL, Lausanne)... Three projects exploiting the multi-fiber facility, the high-density of sources, and the wide-field coverage to measure velocities at different scales for cosmological purposes. 1. Gravitational lensing by velocity maps using multi-fiber spectroscopy [CS,EJ,JR,JPK] Gravitational lensing deforms the velocity field of a galaxy and its luminosity profile in a different way. As shown in the figure below (left panel), a non-vanishing angle between the gradient of the velocity field of a disk galaxy and its major axis will form in the image plane, probing a direct estimate of the gravitational shear (Blain 2002). As shown by Morales (2006), in case of perfect velocity measurement with only two lensed galaxies one can exactly retrieve the intrinsic gravitational shear; indeed, a lower resolution velocity map can still bring off the same goal, with much smaller number of galaxies than required by traditional (statistical) methods. Left: Ideal spiral galaxy with velocity map of NGC 3145 (color-coded), rotated by i = 60 w.r.t. the line-of-sight (black ellipse in the source plane) and distorted by a gravitational shear (g 1 = g 2 0.4). Center: radial velocity (arbitrary units) as function of the azimuthal angle, measured along a small (blue) and a large (purple) circle; when its radius exceeds the projected boundary of the galaxy, the measure of the velocity is vanishing (dashed line: radial velocity measured along the smaller circle in absence of lensing). Right: proposed configurations with 7 (one-ring) or 19 (two-ring) fibers, one bundle-per-galaxy. -25 Adopting a multi-fiber mode to observe single galaxies with bundles of 7 or 19 fibers ( = 0.3-24 ), -23 one could probe the velocity map of moderately -22 extended galaxies. The figure on the right shows -21 an estimate (based on COSMOS) of the number of -20 galaxies as function of redshift up to r AB 24.5-19 with total flux FWHM in the range 2 3-18 (green, suitable for 1-ring bundles) and 3 6-17 -16 (red, for 2-ring bundles), corresponding respectively to 1780 deg 2 and 400 deg 2-15 and concentrated up to redshift z 0.6 and z 0.35 (3rd -13-14 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 quartile). Besides, bundles could also provide an redshift excellent sky measurement, ensuring the best OH sky-subtraction for the most compact (and thus distant) galaxies. We foresee the use of the ESO 3D-spectrograph MUSE, though adopting a mirror slicer instead of fibers and with smaller field-of-view, as pathfinder for this technique. MR - 5 log h

Although such a measurement would be limited in practice because of the velocity measurement error, one can hope for a shear accuracy measurement improvement by a factor of 10. Sampling the velocity map of moderately extended galaxies at redshift z 0.4 could potentially be of strong interest if combined with a weak lensing survey. 2. Redshift space distortions at high redshift [CS,SdT,LT,HC] Whether the large-scale bulk flow is consistent or not with the ΛCDM model is still under debate. The peculiar velocities of galaxies, driven by the local gravitational interactions and superposed to the global expansion of the universe, yield to coherent bulk flows towards over-dense regions and away from under-dense regions, imprinting a distinct anisotropic feature in the distribution of galaxies in redshift space, generally referred to as redshift space distortions (RSD; Kaiser 1987). As depending on the amplitude of the matter fluctuations, peculiar velocities allow us to measure of the growth-rate of structures, and provide one of the most powerful probes to distinguish between dark energy and modified gravity models (ESA-ESO WG on Fundamental Cosmology, 2003; Astro2010 Panel Reports New Worlds, New Horizons in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2011). Observationally, in the last decade several projects such as 2dFGRS, SDSS, 2SLAQ, and VVDS have used RSD to constrain cosmological parameters, focusing on the dark sectors. More recently, WiggleZ survey has released the first results, and VIPERS (specifically designed to carry out a survey using ESO facilities dedicated to RSD) put the tightest constraint at the highest redshift ever (see De la Torre et al. 2013 for a compilation). All major future cosmological spectroscopic surveys now highlight RSD as one of the key probes. RSD detection by the standard method (quadrupole anisotropy in the redshift-space two-point functions of galaxies) is limited by the sample variance of the power spectrum in the surveyed volume. On large scales, this method yields a measure of β = f/b, where the (linear) growth-rate f = d ln D + /d ln a is the log-derivative of the (linear) growth factor and b is the (linear) luminosity bias of galaxies. Neglecting systematic errors, the sample-variance limit for standard RSD analyses can be approximated by σ ln β A b 0.7 V 0.5 exp(b/b 2 n), in which n is the expected mean number density of galaxies within the survey volume V, and A and B numerical constants (Bianchi et al. 2012). All future spectroscopic surveys will provide tighter cosmological constraints than previously achieved using RSD by measuring a high density of sources over a much wider field-of-view than current RSD motivated survey such as VIPERS. The figure illustrates the relative error on β as function of the galaxy bias b for current and expected constraints (solid and dashed lines, respectively) and for two MSE configurations (wide-z: 0.5 z 2, and deep-z: 1 z 2, both with n = 0.0003 h 3 Mpc 3 and 10,000 deg 2, leading respectively to 15M and 12M spectra) compared to the most competitive future surveys assuming ideal baselines (PFS-SuMIRe: 1,500 deg 2, 4M galaxies; DESI: 14,000 deg 2, 25M galaxies; Euclid: 15,000 deg 2, 30M galaxies). The deep-z configuration would extend the redshift range of VIPERS, whilst the wide-z one is expected to attain the DESI precision observing a much smaller number of galaxies, provided their luminosity bias is b 1.3. The impact on a wider parameter space allowing for more complex cosmological scenarios is left for future study.

3. Peculiar velocity survey above 300 Mpc/h in the northern hemisphere [HC,CS,LT,TB,YC] In a galaxy peculiar velocity survey the measurements of redshifts are combined with redshiftindependent distance estimates to yield a direct probe of galaxy peculiar velocities. In the 1990s peculiar velocity surveys were widely recognized as a powerful tool to constrain the mean mass density on cosmological scales. Though, their analysis was challenging, because of sparsity, noise, and observational selection effects (Malmquist bias). The most recent surveys have increased the samples, reaching size large enough to permit the study not only of the global statistics of large-scale flows but also of the details of the local velocity field. The final SFI++ peculiar velocity catalog (Springob et al. 2007) collected about 4900 field and cluster galaxies over the full sky up to redshift z. 0.05, adopting the Tully-Fisher relation to determine distances along the line-of-sight. Combining six methods to measure the distance including the fundamental plane (FP) method, Cosmicflow-2 (Tully, Courtois et al. 2013) recently probed the peculiar velocities of about 8,000 galaxies in the local Universe (cz 30 000 km s 1 ), which ultimately highlighted the dynamics toward the supercluster named Laniakea dominating the local cosmic-web (Tully, Courtois, Hoffman & Pomarède 2014, Nature, 513, 71). In the Southern hemisphere, based on the 6dF Galaxy Survey (6dFGS; Jones et al. 2004, 2009) and still applying the FP method (Magoulas et al. 2012), a velocity subsample (6dFGSv) containing about 8900 galaxies at redshift z 0.055 has been extracted (Springob et al. 2014) and used to measure the growth-rate by RSD with 13% precision at redshift z 0.07 (Beutler et al. 2012). A successor survey of 6dFGSv is planned to begin in 2015, the Transforming Astronomical Imaging surveys through Polychromatic Analysis of Nebulae (TAIPAN), aiming at extending the upper limit of the velocity subsample of 6dfGSv by a factor of 2 and increasing the number density by 20, collecting 500 000 redshifts to z 0.2 with r 17, K 14, of which about 10% will have FP-based estimation of distances; this goal will be achieved by using the UK Schmidt Telescope with upgraded fiber-fed spectrograph to improve the velocity dispersion measurements. MSE could provide the natural extension of Cosmicflow-2 to redshift z. 0.2, realizing the northern sky counterpart of the TAIPAN peculiar velocity survey. Focusing on the FP method to measure the distance of early-type galaxies, a MSE velocity survey covering effective 10 000 deg2, with galaxy number density and sampling similar to Cosmicflow-2, would require 60 000 galaxies with excellent photometry and spectroscopy to estimate their peculiar velocities with lower-bound velocity dispersion 70 km s 1. The structure and dynamics of the cosmic web, which accordingly would be extended up to 600h 1 Mpc, will represent the pivotal application of such a survey. Cosmic-web components (voids, filaments, sheets, and knots in white, light gray, dark gray, and black, respectively) obtained from the velocity shear tensor (left; V-web) and gravitational tidal tensor (center; T-web); the latter, reconstructed from the density field (right), allows 10 times lower resolution scale (adapted from Hoffman et al. 2012, based on N -body simulation study).

Three cosmological applications can be further envisaged: With an accurate measurement of the peculiar velocities, one could apply the method by Hoffman et al. (2012) to reconstruct the velocity-based cosmic web, or V-web, whose components (sheets, filaments, knots, and voids) are kinematically identified by the local value of the eigenvalues of the velocity shear tensor. Based on N-body simulations (see figure), this technique has been proven to resolve cosmic structures down to 0.1h 1 Mpc, providing much more details than a similar classification algorithm based on the gravitational tidal tensor obtained from the density field (Hahn et al. 2007, Forero-Romero et al. 2009), which allows one to achieve only 1h 1 Mpc resolution scale. 1 The higher resolution can be explained by the slower evolution of the velocity field away from the linear-regime than the density field, which therefore retains less memory of the initial conditions. The V-web further provides a platform for investigating the segregation of galaxies and halos with respect to their environment. Unlike galaxy redshift surveys, peculiar velocity surveys do not suffer from the cosmic variance. Indeed, they intrinsically allow the combined measurement of galaxy density and peculiar velocities, which sharing the same random perturbation allow us to avoid this limit without any assumption about the bias (unlike the multi-tracer technique originally proposed by Mc Donald & Seljak 2009, which is based on galaxy density measurements only). Here, predicting the expected velocities from the smoothed galaxy distribution and comparing with the observed peculiar velocities, the measurement of fσ 8 or β from angle-averaged auto- and cross-power spectra of galaxy density and line-of-sight peculiar velocities can attain arbitrarily high precision; unlike constraints from RSD only, the relative error of these parameters monotonically decrease with the mean number density of sources n (Koda et al. 2014). With a similar setup as the TAIPAN survey, a MSE peculiar velocity survey providing line-of-sight distances of 55 000 galaxies up to z 0.1 will achieve n 0.002 h 3 Mpc 3, allowing for an improvement by a factor of 2 to 4 on fσ 8 and β with respect to both current peculiar velocity measurements and RSD-only low-redshift estimates. Besides, as not affected by cosmic variance, peculiar velocity surveys are the ideal framework to investigate primordial non-gaussianities and general-relativistic (gauge) problems specific of large scales. A challenging extension of the MSE peculiar velocity survey to larger redshift, looking for an optimal trade-off between number density and velocity dispersion measurements for the FP method (which increase linearly with distance and are dominated by systematics), is left for a future study. A unique cosmological application of peculiar velocity surveys is the direct measurement of the so-called kinematical backreaction the pure general-relativistic mechanism intrinsic in the non-linearity of the Einstein equations, which yields effective energy sources in the Friedmann equations dynamically equivalent to dark matter (on small/galactic scales) and to dark energy (on large/cosmological scales; Buchert 2001). In the era of precision cosmology, aiming at validating or disproving the cosmological standard model and the theory of General Relativity, a quantitative measurement of this quantity is mandatory. Peculiar velocity surveys provide the key ingredient to probe this concept. Indeed, as long as the velocity field in redshift space is irrotational, and so may be derived from a velocity potential (Nusser & Davis 1994), there exists a well-established relationship between its morphology, probed by the so-called Minkowski functionals, and the kinematical backreaction term (Buchert 2008). 1 Courtois et al. (in prep.) is conducting a similar analysis based on Cosmicflow-2 data set.

A MSE peculiar velocity survey exploring the large scales up to z 0.2 could be employed to reconstruct the velocity potential, e.g. using the Nusser & Davis or the Hoffman et al. techniques, up to scales minimally affected by vorticity, and then measure its morphology to directly extract the kinematical backreaction term. This measurement can be further used to efficiently calibrate the backreaction term at mildly higher redshift, z 0.5, when on large scales its contribution may be non-negligible with respect to the cosmological constant or any other dark energy candidate. The unique combination of sky coverage and depth provided by MSE would allow to attain scales sufficiently large to probe the ΛCDM model and the underlying space-time metric with unprecedented statistical precision and accuracy. The exploration of an optimal observational strategy in terms of redshift range and sky coverage, which would allow us to simultaneously 1) measure the intrinsic gravitational lensing of low-redshift galaxies by measuring their velocity map, 2) measure the RSD at high redshift, z 1 2, and 3) perform a detailed peculiar velocity survey up to redshift z 0.2, is left for future study.