Generalized Kronecker Product and Its Application

Similar documents
POSITIVE IMPLICATIVE AND ASSOCIATIVE FILTERS OF LATTICE IMPLICATION ALGEBRAS

Lecture 8: Abstract Algebra

SOME INTEGRAL INEQUALITIES FOR HARMONICALLY CONVEX STOCHASTIC PROCESSES ON THE CO-ORDINATES

Proportions: A ratio is the quotient of two numbers. For example, 2 3

Compression of Palindromes and Regularity.

Linear Algebra Introduction

On Implicative and Strong Implicative Filters of Lattice Wajsberg Algebras

Lesson 55 - Inverse of Matrices & Determinants

I 3 2 = I I 4 = 2A

Section 2.3. Matrix Inverses

SOME COPLANAR POINTS IN TETRAHEDRON

Necessary and sucient conditions for some two. Abstract. Further we show that the necessary conditions for the existence of an OD(44 s 1 s 2 )

Tikrit Journal of Pure Science 21 (1) 2016 ISSN:

Elements of Matrix Algebra

Eigenvectors and Eigenvalues

SEMI-EXCIRCLE OF QUADRILATERAL

Lecture 2: Cayley Graphs

for all x in [a,b], then the area of the region bounded by the graphs of f and g and the vertical lines x = a and x = b is b [ ( ) ( )] A= f x g x dx

ON LEFT(RIGHT) SEMI-REGULAR AND g-reguar po-semigroups. Sang Keun Lee

#A42 INTEGERS 11 (2011) ON THE CONDITIONED BINOMIAL COEFFICIENTS

Relations between a dual unit vector and Frenet vectors of a dual curve

Lecture 6: Coding theory

Solutions to Problem Set #1

EXTENSION OF THE GCD STAR OF DAVID THEOREM TO MORE THAN TWO GCDS CALVIN LONG AND EDWARD KORNTVED

The study of dual integral equations with generalized Legendre functions

Reference : Croft & Davison, Chapter 12, Blocks 1,2. A matrix ti is a rectangular array or block of numbers usually enclosed in brackets.

18.06 Problem Set 4 Due Wednesday, Oct. 11, 2006 at 4:00 p.m. in 2-106

Dorf, R.C., Wan, Z. T- Equivalent Networks The Electrical Engineering Handbook Ed. Richard C. Dorf Boca Raton: CRC Press LLC, 2000

Mathematical Proofs Table of Contents

On the Spectra of Bipartite Directed Subgraphs of K 4

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TWO RIEMANN-STIELTJES INTEGRAL MEANS

A Lower Bound for the Length of a Partial Transversal in a Latin Square, Revised Version

Factorising FACTORISING.

Ranking Generalized Fuzzy Numbers using centroid of centroids

A Short Introduction to Self-similar Groups

Matrix Algebra. Matrix Addition, Scalar Multiplication and Transposition. Linear Algebra I 24

CS 491G Combinatorial Optimization Lecture Notes

F / x everywhere in some domain containing R. Then, + ). (10.4.1)

On the properties of the two-sided Laplace transform and the Riemann hypothesis

Chapter 3. Vector Spaces. 3.1 Images and Image Arithmetic

Mid-Term Examination - Spring 2014 Mathematical Programming with Applications to Economics Total Score: 45; Time: 3 hours

Counting Paths Between Vertices. Isomorphism of Graphs. Isomorphism of Graphs. Isomorphism of Graphs. Isomorphism of Graphs. Isomorphism of Graphs

Research Article The Group Involutory Matrix of the Combinations of Two Idempotent Matrices

COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT APPROXIMATIONS OF FUZZY NUMBERS

New centroid index for ordering fuzzy numbers

Deflection of Beams by Means of Static Green Functions

APPLICATION OF STRASSEN S ALGORITHM IN RHOTRIX ROW-COLUMN MULTIPLICATION

Pre-Lie algebras, rooted trees and related algebraic structures

A New Grey-rough Set Model Based on Interval-Valued Grey Sets

A Study on the Properties of Rational Triangles

Introduction To Matrices MCV 4UI Assignment #1

KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA IIT KANPUR HOME ASSIGNMENTS FOR SUMMER VACATIONS CLASS - XII MATHEMATICS (Relations and Functions & Binary Operations)

Properties of Different Types of Lorentz Transformations

Implication Graphs and Logic Testing

Graph Theory. Simple Graph G = (V, E). V={a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,k} E={(a,b),(a,g),( a,h),(a,k),(b,c),(b,k),...,(h,k)}

Core 2 Logarithms and exponentials. Section 1: Introduction to logarithms

A STUDY OF Q-CONTIGUOUS FUNCTION RELATIONS

arxiv: v1 [math.ct] 8 Sep 2009

Discrete Structures, Test 2 Monday, March 28, 2016 SOLUTIONS, VERSION α

Logic, Set Theory and Computability [M. Coppenbarger]

Introduction to Olympiad Inequalities

TOPIC: LINEAR ALGEBRA MATRICES

Matrix & Vector Basic Linear Algebra & Calculus

arxiv: v1 [math.ca] 21 Aug 2018

CIT 596 Theory of Computation 1. Graphs and Digraphs

Hyers-Ulam stability of Pielou logistic difference equation

Co-ordinated s-convex Function in the First Sense with Some Hadamard-Type Inequalities

Lecture Solution of a System of Linear Equation

DEFORMATIONS OF ASSOCIATIVE ALGEBRAS WITH INNER PRODUCTS

Electromagnetic-Power-based Modal Classification, Modal Expansion, and Modal Decomposition for Perfect Electric Conductors

CARLETON UNIVERSITY. 1.0 Problems and Most Solutions, Sect B, 2005

The numbers inside a matrix are called the elements or entries of the matrix.

Computing all-terminal reliability of stochastic networks with Binary Decision Diagrams

RELATIONS ON BI-PERIODIC JACOBSTHAL SEQUENCE

Chapter Gauss Quadrature Rule of Integration

Technology Mapping Method for Low Power Consumption and High Performance in General-Synchronous Framework

Exercise 3 Logic Control

A Study of Some Integral Problems Using Maple

Proving the Pythagorean Theorem. Proving the Pythagorean Theorem and the Converse of the Pythagorean Theorem

Surds and Indices. Surds and Indices. Curriculum Ready ACMNA: 233,

Matrix- System of rows and columns each position in a matrix has a purpose. 5 Ex: 5. Ex:

On a Class of Planar Graphs with Straight-Line Grid Drawings on Linear Area

Set up Invariable Axiom of Force Equilibrium and Solve Problems about Transformation of Force and Gravitational Mass

Lecture 3. In this lecture, we will discuss algorithms for solving systems of linear equations.

Boolean Algebra. Boolean Algebra

An introduction to groups

SYMPLECTIC OPERAD GEOMETRY AND GRAPH HOMOLOGY arxiv:math/ v1 [math.qa] 29 Nov 2002

ON AN INEQUALITY FOR THE MEDIANS OF A TRIANGLE

H SERIES. Algebra Basics. Algebra Basics. Solutions. Curriculum Ready.

Engr354: Digital Logic Circuits

Numbers and indices. 1.1 Fractions. GCSE C Example 1. Handy hint. Key point

Exponentiated Generalized. Transformed-Transformer. Family of Distributions

Qubit and Quantum Gates

SUMMER KNOWHOW STUDY AND LEARNING CENTRE

Lecture 11 Binary Decision Diagrams (BDDs)

Analysis of Temporal Interactions with Link Streams and Stream Graphs

Edexcel Level 3 Advanced GCE in Mathematics (9MA0) Two-year Scheme of Work

The vertex leafage of chordal graphs

CS12N: The Coming Revolution in Computer Architecture Laboratory 2 Preparation

Introduction to Electrical & Electronic Engineering ENGG1203

Transcription:

Vol. 1, No. 1 ISSN: 1916-9795 Generlize Kroneker Prout n Its Applition Xingxing Liu Shool of mthemtis n omputer Siene Ynn University Shnxi 716000, Chin E-mil: lxx6407@163.om Astrt In this pper, we promote the efinition of Kroneker prout, n give its orresponing properties. As the pplition of generlize Kroneker prout, this pper shows the etermintion metho tht the lgeri opertion in finite set suits the ssoitive lw. Keywors: Generlize Kroneker prout, Assozitivitet, Deision onition 1. Introution Kroneker prout expresses speil prout of mtrix. The prout of mtrix A y m n n mtrix B y p q n e enote y A B, whih is mtrix y mp nq. Definition 1.(Kroneker prout) (BellmnR.,1970) The prout of mtrix A y m n n mtrix B y p q n e enote y A B, whih is efine s follows: 11 B 12 B 1n B 21 B 22 B 2n B A B [ i, j B]....... m1 B m2 B mn B Kroneker prout lso n e lle iret prout or tensor prout. Kroneker prout hs the following properties: 1). For A m n n B p q, generlly A B B A. 2). The Kroneker prout of ritrry mtrix n zero mtrix equls zero mtrix, i.e. A 0 0 A 0. 3). If α n β re onstnt, αa βb αβ(a B). 4). For A m n, B n k, C l p n D p q, AB CD (A C)(B D). 5). For A m n, B p q, C p q, A (B ± C) (A B) ± (A C), (B ± C) A (B A) ± (C A). Note: properties 1)-5) is referre from (Ro R,1971). 6).For A m n n B p q,(a B) T A T B T. 7). For A m n n B p q, rnk(a B) rnk(a)rnk(b). 8). For A m m n B n n, et(a B) (eta) n (etb) n. 9). For A m m n B n n, tr(a B) tr(a)tr(b). 10). For A m n, B m n, C p q n D p q,(a + B) (C + D) A C + A D + B C + B D. 92 www.senet.org/jmr

Journl of Mthemtis Reserh Mrh, 2009 11). For A m n, B k l, C p q n D r s,(a B) (C D) A B C D. 12). For A m n, B k l, C p q,(a B) C A (B C). 13). For A m n, B p q, C n r n D q s,(a B)(C D) (A C)(B D). Note: properties 6)-13) is referre from (Brewer j w, 1978, 772-781). But for the nee of the rel life n the mthemtis evelopment, the element of mtrix my not limit to numers, thus we introue new onept, lso nmely promoting the mtrix onept. 2. Definition of generlize Kroneker prout Definition 2. Suppose S e nonempty set, (S,, +) e n lger system, then A is mtrix in lgeri system (S,, +) if n only if A [ ij ] m n, ij S (i 1, 2,, m; j 1, 2,, n). Definition of Kroneker prout n e promote s the elow efinition. Definition 3(generlize Kroneker prout). The Kroneker prout of mtrix A y m n n mtrix B y p q in lger system (S,, +) n e enote y A B, whih is efine s follows: 11 B 12 B 1n B 21 B 22 B 2n B A B [ ij B]....... m1 B m2 B mn B Note: The generlize prout, ition n numer prout of mtrix re similr with the usul prout, ition n numer prout of mtrix. 3. Properties of generlize Kroneker prout Theorem 1. For A m n n B p q, generlly A B B A. Sine the numer operte is speil lgeri opertor, for restrite untenle proposition, it is lso untenle in generlize onition. Theorem 2. The Kroneker prout of ritrry mtrix n zero mtrix equls zero mtrix, i.e. A 0 0 A 0. The reson is s tht of theorem 1. Theorem 3. If (S, ) is ommuttive semi-group, n for ritrry α n β,(α A) (β B) (α β) (A B). This theorem is equivlent the operte of elements: (α i, j ) (β kl ) (α β) ( ij kl ), where ij [A] ij, kl [B] kl. Theorem 4. If (S, ) is ommuttive semi-group, n for A m n, B n k, C l p n D p q,(a B) (C D) (A C) (B D). This theorem is equivlent the operte of elements: ( ij kl ) ( tu wv ) ( i, j tu ) ( kl wv ), where ij [A] ij, kl [B] kl, tu [C] tu, wv [D] wv. Theorem 5. If (S, +, ) is ring, n for A m n, B p q, C p q, A (B ± C) (A B) ± (A C), (B ± C) A (B A) ± (C A). Theorem 6. If (S, ) is ommuttive lgeri system, n for A m n n B p q,(a B) T A T B T. Theorem 7. If (S, +, ) is ring n for A m n, B m n, C p q n D p q,(a+b) (C+D) A C+A D+B C+B D. This theorem is equivlent the operte of elements: ( ij + ij ) ( kl + kl ) ij kl + ij kl + ij kl + ij kl, where ij [A] ij, ij [B] ij, kl [C] kl, kl [D] kl. Theorem 8. If (S, ) is ommuttive semi-group, n for A m n, B k l, C p q n D r s,(a B) (C D) A B C D. This theorem is equivlent the operte of elements: ( ij kl ) ( tu wv ) ij kl tu wv, where ij [A] ij, kl [B] kl, tu [C] tu, wv [D] wv. Theorem 9. If (S, ) is semi-group, n for A m n, B k l, C p q,(a B) C A (B C). www.senet.org/jmr 93

Vol. 1, No. 1 ISSN: 1916-9795 This theorem is equivlent the operte of elements: ( ij kl ) tu ij ( kl tu ), where ij [A] ij, kl [B] kl, tu [C] tu. Theorem 10. If (S, ) is ommuttive semi-group, n for A m n, B p q, C n r n D q s,(a B) (C D) (A C) (B D), where ij [A] ij, kl [B] kl, tu [C] tu, wv [D] wv. This theorem is equivlent the operte of elements: ( ij kl ) ( tu wv ) ( ij tu ) ( kl wv ). 4. Applition of generlize Kroneker prout [7],[8],[9],[10],[11] Theorem 12. Suppose S { 1, 2,, n } n (S, ) is n lgeri system, then the tle of lgeri opertor in S is s follows: <Figure1> Construt A [ 1 2 n ] T, then (S, ) is semi-group if n only if A (A A T ) (A A) A T. Theorem 13. Suppose S { 1, 2,, n } n (S, ) is n lgeri system, then the tle of lgeri opertor in S is s follows: <Figure1> Construt A [ 1 2 n ] T, then the lgeri opertor of S stisfies ssoitive lw if n if only A (A A T ) (A A) A T. Smple: Suppose set S {,,, }, the lgeri opertor in S is s follows: <Figure2> then whether is the lgeri opertor in S ssoitive? Proof: Esily, lgeri opertor in finite set S is lose, then (S, ) is lgeri system. Construt mtrix A, n the efinition of generlize Kroneker prout is s efinition 3, then [ ] A (A A T [ ] ) ( [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 94 www.senet.org/jmr

Journl of Mthemtis Reserh Mrh, 2009. But (A A) A T ( ) [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] www.senet.org/jmr 95

Vol. 1, No. 1 ISSN: 1916-9795 Beuse [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]. [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]. A (A A T ) (A A) A T. From theorem 13, the lgeri opertor in S is suit for ssoitive lw. Referenes Bellmn R. (1970). Introution to Mtrix Anlysis. New York: MGrw-Hill. Ltkepohl H. (1996). Hnook of Mtries. New York:John Wiley n Sones. Ro C R,Mitr S K. (1971). Generlize Inverse of Mteies]. New York: John Wiley n Sones. Brewer J W. (1978). Kroneker prouts n mtrix lulus in system theory. IEEE Trns Ciruits n Systems, 25, 772-781. Xin Zhng. (2004), Anlysis of mtrix n its pplition. Beijing: tsinghu university press, 107-132. Anrews H C,Kne J. (1970). Kroneker mtries, omputetr implementtion, n generlize spetr. J Asso Comput Mh, 17: 260-268. Alexner S T. (1986). Aptive Signl Proessing: Theory n Applitions. New York: Springer Verlg. Shoxue Liu. (1999). Bse of Moern Alger. Beijing: High Eution Press. Pinsn Wu. (1979). Moern Alger. Beijing: High Eution Press. Gunzhng Hu. (1999). Applition Moern Alger. Beijing: tsinghu university press. Pingtin Zhu, Bohong Li Et. (2001) Moern Alger. Beijing: Sientifi Press. 96 www.senet.org/jmr

Journl of Mthemtis Reserh Mrh, 2009 Figure 1 Figure 2 www.senet.org/jmr 97