Transient response via gain adjustment. Consider a unity feedback system, where G(s) = 2. The closed loop transfer function is. s 2 + 2ζωs + ω 2 n

Similar documents
Homework 7 - Solutions

EE C128 / ME C134 Fall 2014 HW 8 - Solutions. HW 8 - Solutions

EE C128 / ME C134 Fall 2014 HW 6.2 Solutions. HW 6.2 Solutions

CHAPTER 7 : BODE PLOTS AND GAIN ADJUSTMENTS COMPENSATION

MAS107 Control Theory Exam Solutions 2008

Frequency Response Techniques

ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATIONS DEP. 3rd YEAR, 2010/2011 CONTROL ENGINEERING SHEET 5 Lead-Lag Compensation Techniques

Systems Analysis and Control

EE 4343/ Control System Design Project LECTURE 10

Exercises for lectures 13 Design using frequency methods

Course roadmap. Step response for 2nd-order system. Step response for 2nd-order system

(b) A unity feedback system is characterized by the transfer function. Design a suitable compensator to meet the following specifications:

Systems Analysis and Control

EE3CL4: Introduction to Linear Control Systems

Design via Frequency Response

Software Engineering 3DX3. Slides 8: Root Locus Techniques

The requirements of a plant may be expressed in terms of (a) settling time (b) damping ratio (c) peak overshoot --- in time domain

Root Locus Techniques

R a) Compare open loop and closed loop control systems. b) Clearly bring out, from basics, Force-current and Force-Voltage analogies.

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mechanical Engineering Dynamics and Control II Fall 2007

Control Systems. University Questions

IMPROVED TECHNIQUE OF MULTI-STAGE COMPENSATION. K. M. Yanev A. Obok Opok

ECE382/ME482 Spring 2005 Homework 6 Solution April 17, (s/2 + 1) s(2s + 1)[(s/8) 2 + (s/20) + 1]

ROOT LOCUS. Consider the system. Root locus presents the poles of the closed-loop system when the gain K changes from 0 to. H(s) H ( s) = ( s)

UNIVERSITY OF BOLTON SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING BENG (HONS) IN BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING SEMESTER 1 EXAMINATION 2017/2018 ADVANCED BIOMECHATRONIC SYSTEMS

DESIGN USING TRANSFORMATION TECHNIQUE CLASSICAL METHOD

R10 JNTUWORLD B 1 M 1 K 2 M 2. f(t) Figure 1

SKEE 3143 CONTROL SYSTEM DESIGN. CHAPTER 3 Compensator Design Using the Bode Plot

AMME3500: System Dynamics & Control

Asymptotic Bode Plot & Lead-Lag Compensator

Controls Problems for Qualifying Exam - Spring 2014

Frequency methods for the analysis of feedback systems. Lecture 6. Loop analysis of feedback systems. Nyquist approach to study stability

Solutions to Skill-Assessment Exercises

Automatic Control 2. Loop shaping. Prof. Alberto Bemporad. University of Trento. Academic year

Dynamic Compensation using root locus method

CHAPTER 7 STEADY-STATE RESPONSE ANALYSES

Lecture 6 Classical Control Overview IV. Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore

Compensator Design to Improve Transient Performance Using Root Locus

Proportional plus Integral (PI) Controller

Control Systems I Lecture 10: System Specifications

Boise State University Department of Electrical Engineering ECE461 Control Systems. Control System Design in the Frequency Domain

1 (20 pts) Nyquist Exercise

r + - FINAL June 12, 2012 MAE 143B Linear Control Prof. M. Krstic

8.1.6 Quadratic pole response: resonance

Chapter 2 SDOF Vibration Control 2.1 Transfer Function

Due Wednesday, February 6th EE/MFS 599 HW #5

Controller Design using Root Locus

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mechanical Engineering Dynamics and Control II Fall K(s +1)(s +2) G(s) =.

Radar Dish. Armature controlled dc motor. Inside. θ r input. Outside. θ D output. θ m. Gearbox. Control Transmitter. Control. θ D.

INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL CONTROL

Root Locus Methods. The root locus procedure

KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING

EE C128 / ME C134 Fall 2014 HW 9 Solutions. HW 9 Solutions. 10(s + 3) s(s + 2)(s + 5) G(s) =

Stability of CL System

ME 375 Final Examination Thursday, May 7, 2015 SOLUTION

Control Systems. Control Systems Design Lead-Lag Compensator.

Plan of the Lecture. Goal: wrap up lead and lag control; start looking at frequency response as an alternative methodology for control systems design.

EEE 184 Project: Option 1

Delhi Noida Bhopal Hyderabad Jaipur Lucknow Indore Pune Bhubaneswar Kolkata Patna Web: Ph:

ECE 388 Automatic Control

Chapter 9: Controller design

Frequency Response Analysis

ME 375 EXAM #1 Friday, March 13, 2015 SOLUTION

FREQUENCY-RESPONSE DESIGN

100 (s + 10) (s + 100) e 0.5s. s 100 (s + 10) (s + 100). G(s) =

Outline. Classical Control. Lecture 5

Performance of Feedback Control Systems

LABORATORY INSTRUCTION MANUAL CONTROL SYSTEM II LAB EE 693

EECS C128/ ME C134 Final Thu. May 14, pm. Closed book. One page, 2 sides of formula sheets. No calculators.

16.30/31, Fall 2010 Recitation # 2

1 (s + 3)(s + 2)(s + a) G(s) = C(s) = K P + K I

Design of a Lead Compensator

Frequency (rad/s)

VALLIAMMAI ENGINEERING COLLEGE SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur

ECE382/ME482 Spring 2005 Homework 8 Solution December 11,

Root Locus Design Example #4

6.1 Sketch the z-domain root locus and find the critical gain for the following systems K., the closed-loop characteristic equation is K + z 0.

DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING

H(s) = s. a 2. H eq (z) = z z. G(s) a 2. G(s) A B. s 2 s(s + a) 2 s(s a) G(s) 1 a 1 a. } = (z s 1)( z. e ) ) (z. (z 1)(z e at )(z e at )

INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING Dundigal, Hyderabad ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING TUTORIAL QUESTION BANK

(a) Find the transfer function of the amplifier. Ans.: G(s) =

NADAR SARASWATHI COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY Vadapudupatti, Theni

Module 3F2: Systems and Control EXAMPLES PAPER 2 ROOT-LOCUS. Solutions

Chapter 5 HW Solution

PM diagram of the Transfer Function and its use in the Design of Controllers

Systems Analysis and Control

Today (10/23/01) Today. Reading Assignment: 6.3. Gain/phase margin lead/lag compensator Ref. 6.4, 6.7, 6.10

Homework Assignment 3

Lecture 11. Frequency Response in Discrete Time Control Systems

Outline. Classical Control. Lecture 1

Goals for today 2.004

Control Systems Engineering ( Chapter 8. Root Locus Techniques ) Prof. Kwang-Chun Ho Tel: Fax:

AN INTRODUCTION TO THE CONTROL THEORY

IC6501 CONTROL SYSTEMS

INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING (Autonomous) Dundigal, Hyderabad

Step Response Analysis. Frequency Response, Relation Between Model Descriptions

ME 475/591 Control Systems Final Exam Fall '99

Introduction to Feedback Control

Time Response Analysis (Part II)

Chapter 7. Digital Control Systems

Transcription:

Design via frequency response Transient response via gain adjustment Consider a unity feedback system, where G(s) = ωn 2. The closed loop transfer function is s(s+2ζω n ) T(s) = ω 2 n s 2 + 2ζωs + ω 2 n Figure above; The time response of the second order underdamped system 1

The percentage overshoot, %OS, is given by %OS = c max c final c final Note that %OS is a function only of the damping ratio, ζ. %OS = e (ζπ/ 1 ζ 2) 100 The inverse is given by ζ = ln(%os/100) π 2 + ln 2 (%OS/100) There is also a relationship between damping ratio and phase margin. The phase margin is obtained by solving G(jω) = 1 to obtain the frequency as ω 1 = ω n 2ζ 2 + The phase margin is Φ M = arctan 1 + 4ζ 4 2ζ 2ζ 2 + 1 + 4ζ 4 2

Thus if we can vary the phase margin, we can vary the percent overshoot, via a simple gain adjustment. Figure above; Bode plots showing gain adjustment for a desired phase margin. 3

Problem: For the position control system shown below, find the value of preamplifier gain, K, to yield a 9.5% overshoot in the transient response for a step input. Use only frequency response methods. Figure above; Bode plots for the example above. 4

Solution: 1. G(s) = 100K s(s+36)(s+100). Choose K = 3.6 to start the magnitude plot at 0dB. 2. Use ζ = ln(%os/100) π 2 + ln 2 (%OS/100) to find ζ = 0.6 for %OS/100 = 0.095, and then use 2ζ Φ M = arctan 2ζ 2 + 1 + 4ζ 4 to find Φ M = 59.2 for ζ = 0.6. 3. Locate on the phase plot the frequency that yields a 59.2 margin. This means 120.8 phase angle at frequency of 14.8 rad/s. 4. At 14.8 rad/s on the magnitude plot, the gain is found to be -44.2dB. This magnitude has to be raise to 0dB to yield the required phase margin. 44.2dB increase is 162.2 in gain, Thus K = 3.6 162.2 = 583.9. 5

Lag compensation The steady error constants are: position constant K p = lim s 0 G(s), velocity constant K v = lim s 0 sg(s), and acceleration constant K a = lim s 0 s 2 G(s). The value of the steady-state error decreases as the steady error constants increases. The function of the lag compensator is to (i) improve the steady error constant by increasing only the low-frequency gain without any resulting instability, and (2) increase the phase margin of the system to yield the desired transient response. 6

Visualizing lag compensation The transfer function of the lag compensator is where α > 1. G c (s) = s + 1 T s + 1 αt Figure above; Frequency response of a lag compensator s+0.1 s+0.01 7

In the figure below, the uncompensated system is unstable since the gain at 180 is greater than 0dB. The lag compensator, while not changing the low-frequency gain, does reduce the high frequency gain. The magnitude curve can be shaped to go through 0dB at the desired phase margin to obtain the desired transient response. Figure above; visualizing lag compensation 8

Design procedure 1. Set the gain,k, to the value that satisfies the steady-state error specification and plot the Bode plots based on this gain. 2. Find the frequency where the phase margin is 5 to 12 greater than the phase margin that yields the desired transient response. 3. Select a lag compensator whose magnitude response yields a composite Bode diagram that goes 0dB at the frequency found in step 2; (For detail see the next example) 4. Reset the system gain, K, to compensate for any attenuation in the lag network in order to keep the static error constant the same as that found in step 1. 9

Problem: For the same previous position control system, use Bode Diagrams to design a lag compensator to yield a a ten-fold improvement in steady-state error over the gain-compensated system while keeping the percent overshoot at 9.5%. Solution: 1. The gain-compensated system is G(s) = 58390 s(s + 36)(s + 100) Thus K v = 16.22, a ten-fold improvement changes K v = 162.2. Thus K needs to be set at K = 5839, and the open loop transfer function G(s) = 583900 s(s + 36)(s + 100) 10

Figure above; Bode plots showing lag compensator design. 2. The phase margin required for %OS/100 = 0.095 (ζ = 0.6) is Φ M = 59.2. We increase this value by 10 to Φ M = 69.2 (i.e. phase angle 110.8 ). The frequency is 9.8rad/s. At this frequency the magitude plot must go through 0dB. The magnitude at 9.8rad/s is 24dB. Thus the lag compensator must provide -24dB attenuation at 9.8rad/s. 11

3.&4. We now design the compensator. First draw the high frequency asymptote at -24dB. Arbitrarily select the higher break frequency to be about one decade below the phase margin frequency, i.e. at 0.98rad/s, to start drawing a -20dB/decade until 0dB is reached. The lower break frequency is found to be 0.062rad/s. Hence the lag compensator s transfer function is 0.063(s + 0.98) G c (s) = (s + 0.062) where the gain 0.063 of the compensator is set to achieve a dc gain of unity. The compensated system s forward transfer function is thus G c (s)g(s) = 36786(s + 0.98) s(s + 36)(s + 100)(s + 0.062) 12