XPS/UPS and EFM. Brent Gila. XPS/UPS Ryan Davies EFM Andy Gerger

Similar documents
X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) Prof. Paul K. Chu

Auger Electron Spectroscopy

Case Study of Electronic Materials Packaging with Poor Metal Adhesion and the Process for Performing Root Cause Failure Analysis

PHI 5000 Versaprobe-II Focus X-ray Photo-electron Spectroscopy

Electronic Supplementary Information. Molecular Antenna Tailored Organic Thin-film Transistor for. Sensing Application

Role of Electrochemical Reactions in the Degradation Mechanisms of AlGaN/GaN HEMTs

CVD-3 LFSIN SiN x Process

CVD-3 MFSIN-HU-2 SiN x Mixed Frequency Process

CVD-3 MFSIN-HU-1 SiN x Mixed Frequency Process

Local Anodic Oxidation of GaAs: A Nanometer-Scale Spectroscopic Study with PEEM

Characterization of Secondary Emission Materials for Micro-Channel Plates. S. Jokela, I. Veryovkin, A. Zinovev

Application of Surface Analysis for Root Cause Failure Analysis

Spin-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy

Auger Electron Spectroscopy (AES)

Energy Spectroscopy. Ex.: Fe/MgO

XPS & Scanning Auger Principles & Examples

Energy Spectroscopy. Excitation by means of a probe

Effects of plasma treatment on the precipitation of fluorine-doped silicon oxide

Introduction to X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) XPS which makes use of the photoelectric effect, was developed in the mid-1960

MSE 321 Structural Characterization

CVD-3 SIO-HU SiO 2 Process

A DIVISION OF ULVAC-PHI

Surface and Interface Characterization of Polymer Films

Normally-Off GaN Field Effect Power Transistors: Device Design and Process Technology Development

Nitride HFETs applications: Conductance DLTS

Traps in MOCVD n-gan Studied by Deep Level Transient Spectroscopy and Minority Carrier Transient Spectroscopy

Lecture 5. X-ray Photoemission Spectroscopy (XPS)

IV. Surface analysis for chemical state, chemical composition

Plasma Deposition (Overview) Lecture 1

Sensors and Metrology. Outline

Photoemission Spectroscopy

ToF-SIMS or XPS? Xinqi Chen Keck-II

Photoelectron spectroscopy Instrumentation. Nanomaterials characterization 2

Reduced preferential sputtering of TiO 2 (and Ta 2 O 5 ) thin films through argon cluster ion bombardment.

The Use of Synchrotron Radiation in Modern Research

Planar View of Structural Degradation in GaN HEMT: Voltage, Time and Temperature Dependence

Thermal measurement a requirement for monolithic microwave integrated circuit design

UVTOP265-HL-TO39. Description. Maximum Rating (T CASE = 25 C) Electro-Optical Characteristics (T CASE = 25 C, I F = 20 ma)

Auger Electron Spectroscopy (AES) Prof. Paul K. Chu

Self-study problems and questions Processing and Device Technology, FFF110/FYSD13

MSE 321 Structural Characterization

Lecture 23 X-Ray & UV Techniques

DEPOSITION OF THIN TiO 2 FILMS BY DC MAGNETRON SPUTTERING METHOD

Applications of XPS, AES, and TOF-SIMS

MS482 Materials Characterization ( 재료분석 ) Lecture Note 12: Summary. Byungha Shin Dept. of MSE, KAIST

Multi-technique photoelectron spectrometer for micro-area spectroscopy and imaging

OFF-state TDDB in High-Voltage GaN MIS-HEMTs

Birck Nanotechnology Center XPS: X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy ESCA: Electron Spectrometer for Chemical Analysis

X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) Auger Electron Spectroscopy (AES)

5) Surface photoelectron spectroscopy. For MChem, Spring, Dr. Qiao Chen (room 3R506) University of Sussex.

Advanced Lab Course. X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 BASICS 1 3 EXPERIMENT Qualitative analysis Chemical Shifts 7

The design of an integrated XPS/Raman spectroscopy instrument for co-incident analysis

MS482 Materials Characterization ( 재료분석 ) Lecture Note 4: XRF

Methods of surface analysis

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

Atomic Level Analysis of SiC Devices Using Numerical Simulation

Supporting Data. The University of Texas at Dallas, 800 West Campbell Road, Richardson, Texas 75080, United

Strain and Temperature Dependence of Defect Formation at AlGaN/GaN High Electron Mobility Transistors on a Nanometer Scale

2) Atom manipulation. Xe / Ni(110) Model: Experiment:

Local Anodic Oxidation with AFM: A Nanometer-Scale Spectroscopic Study with Photoemission Microscopy

X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)

(a) (b) Supplementary Figure 1. (a) (b) (a) Supplementary Figure 2. (a) (b) (c) (d) (e)

A HYDROGEN SENSITIVE Pd/GaN SCHOTTKY DIODE SENSOR

Supplementary Figure 1. Visible (λ = 633 nm) Raman spectra of a-co x layers. (a) Raman spectra of

DISTRIBUTION OF POTENTIAL BARRIER HEIGHT LOCAL VALUES AT Al-SiO 2 AND Si-SiO 2 INTERFACES OF THE METAL-OXIDE-SEMICONDUCTOR (MOS) STRUCTURES

raw materials C V Mn Mg S Al Ca Ti Cr Si G H Nb Na Zn Ni K Co A B C D E F

structure and paramagnetic character R. Kakavandi, S-A. Savu, A. Caneschi, T. Chassé, M. B. Casu Electronic Supporting Information

Quality and Reliability Report

Focused Ion Beam Induced Local Tungsten Deposition

Electron Microprobe Analysis 1 Nilanjan Chatterjee, Ph.D. Principal Research Scientist

PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY IN AIR (PESA)

Electron Microprobe Analysis 1 Nilanjan Chatterjee, Ph.D. Principal Research Scientist

Cho Fai Jonathan Lau, Xiaofan Deng, Qingshan Ma, Jianghui Zheng, Jae S. Yun, Martin A.

Self-Assembled InAs Quantum Dots

The Benefit of Wide Energy Range Spectrum Acquisition During Sputter Depth Profile Measurements

Magnetic Force Microscopy (MFM) F = µ o (m )H

Removal of Cu Impurities on a Si Substrate by Using (H 2 O 2 +HF) and (UV/O 3 +HF)

MS482 Materials Characterization ( 재료분석 ) Lecture Note 2: UPS

Electron Rutherford Backscattering, a versatile tool for the study of thin films

Surface Sensitivity & Surface Specificity

Nanostructure. Materials Growth Characterization Fabrication. More see Waser, chapter 2

Processing and Characterization of GaSb/High-k Dielectric Interfaces. Pennsylvania 16802, USA. University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA

Theory of Electrical Characterization of Semiconductors

Imaging Methods: Scanning Force Microscopy (SFM / AFM)

PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY (PES)

Secondaryionmassspectrometry

Defense Technical Information Center Compilation Part Notice

Solid State Detectors

Auger Electron Spectroscopy Overview

4FNJDPOEVDUPS 'BCSJDBUJPO &UDI

Spatially resolving density-dependent screening around a single charged atom in graphene

X- ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy and its application in phase- switching device study

Surface Defects on Natural MoS 2

X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)

An Introduction to Auger Electron Spectroscopy

Table 1: Residence time (τ) in seconds for adsorbed molecules

Supporting Information s for

MS482 Materials Characterization ( 재료분석 ) Lecture Note 5: RBS

Etching Issues - Anisotropy. Dry Etching. Dry Etching Overview. Etching Issues - Selectivity

Auger Electron Spectroscopy *

Transcription:

XPS/UPS and EFM Brent Gila XPS/UPS Ryan Davies EFM Andy Gerger

XPS/ESCA X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) also called Electron Spectroscopy for Chemical Analysis (ESCA) is a chemical surface analysis method. XPS measures the chemical composition of the outermost 100 Å of a sample. Measurements can be made at greater depths by ion sputter etching to remove surface layers. All elements (except for H and He) can be detected at concentrations above 1.0 atom %. In addition, chemical bonding information can be determined from detailed analysis. Ga(GaO X ) Ga(GaN) A Ga 3d peak with 2 curves fitted. Can determine relative concentration of Ga-O and Ga-N 30 25 20 15

XPS/UPS XPS/ESCA Perkin-Elmer PHI 5100 ESCA System - MAIC 1. X-ray source Mg or Al anode 2. Sample 3. Lens and aperture 4. Hemisphere energy analyzer 5. Position Sensitive Detector 6. Data Collection - Computer

Past XPS use on HEMT passivation optimization Optimize the ex-situ cleaning recipe Used XPS to determine the surface composition/contamination and nature of the chemical bonding. Oxygen surface conc. increases with ozone exposure time, however, oxygen depth does not. Surface converted to an oxynitride. (sample temperature~50 C) counts Oxygen concentration vs. ozone exposure time as-rec 12.5 min ozone 25 min ozone Surface carbon concentration reduced 50% by conversion to CO and CO 2. 0 5 10 15 sputter cycles (depth)

Past XPS use on HEMT passivation optimization Oxynitride on AlGaN(23%) capped HEMT as received 2 min sputter Native Oxide (0.7eV surface charge) Al 2p Ga 3d O 1s as-rec 1 st sputter 80 76 72 68 30 25 20 15 540 536 532 528 UV-ozone Oxide (0.6eV surface charge) as-rec 1 st sputter 2 nd sputter 3 rd sputter 4 th sputter 80 76 72 68 24 20 16 540 536 532 528

Past XPS use on HEMT passivation optimization Oxynitride on GaN capped HEMT Native Oxide (0.6eV surface charge) as-rec 1 st sputter Counts Ga 3d Counts O 1s 24 20 16 536 532 528 UV-ozone Oxide (4.8eV surface charge) as-rec 1 st sputter 2 nd sputter 3 rd sputter 4 th sputter Counts 28 24 20 16 12 Counts 540 536 532

Past XPS use on HEMT passivation optimization Ga 3d from GaN capped HEMT As-Received GaN Surface Ga 3d GaOx GaN 0 min Ga(GaN) 2 min Ga(GaO X ) 30 25 20 15 Notice the decrease in the GaO X portion (corresponding with sputter time) and the shift in the Ga 3d signal as surface charge is reduced. 30 25 20 15 4 min 6 min 8 min SPUTTER TIME

Past XPS use on HEMT passivation optimization As x-rays enter the material, photo-electrons are generated from different depths. Thick (2nm) ozone GaON is not conductive; electrons leaving the surface are not replenished from the bulk. Large surface charge (4.8eV) is indicated from XPS spectra shift. X-RAY XPS signal Counts Ga 3d e Surface charge forms + + + + + + + + + GaON 28 24 20 16 12 e GaN

Past XPS use on HEMT passivation optimization Current Collapse Measurements HEMT structure As-received UV-Ozone treatment Sc2O3 passivation AlGaN cap 20-23% GaN cap 3nm 50% of DC 35% of DC 80% of DC 40% of DC 40% of DC 95% of DC GaN capped HEMTs show better passivation that AlGaN capped HEMTs Increase in Al% = increase in surface reactivity = less passivation

Large scale features to aid in optimization Effects on Isolation Current mesa to mesa leakage measurements Isolation Current (A) 10-6 Before UV Ozone 25 mins UV Ozone UV Ozone + 3Days Effect 10-7 10-8 10-9 Isolation Current (A) 1x10-5 10-6 10-7 10-8 1. Unpassivated 2. O 3 + Sc 2 O 3 3. O 3 + MgO 4. O 3 + SiN X 5. O 3 + NH 4 OH + SiN X 6. Ashing + NH 4 OH + SiN X 10-10 0 10 20 30 40 Voltage (V) 10-9 Must have isolation for realization of HEMT circuits. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Passivation Method

Large scale features to aid in optimization Passivation Reliability Hall effect samples (5mm x 5mm) are processed to determine the passivation effect of the dielectric films. Samples are aged at elevated temperatures to determine effectiveness. 5mm Hall Effect sample 5mm Hall samples are large enough for further analysis (AFM, AES, XPS) for post aging studies. 13 Sheet Carrier Conc. (x10 cm -2 ) 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 as-rec passivate 100 C age 200 C age control HEMT (no age) aged HEMT (RT) aged HEMT (ele.temp.) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Day Hall sample w/ 10nm MgO passivation, a 15% increases in sheet carrier density post passivation

Small spot XPS/UPS Custom XPS/UPS on Nitride MBE system allows for sample transfer without exposure to atmosphere, 3 wafer capable. Intermediate chamber available for additional processing or testing. System based on a PHI 5400 XPS - Area resolution is <500µm, 2500mm 2 viewing area. Aging of samples by both thermal stress (800 C sample heater) and bias stress (electrical feedthru to sample). Surface chemical desorption experiments and real-time diffusion data possible with sample heater. Ultraviolet He arc discharge source installed for UPS

What UPS adds to the package Mainly used for studies of the valence electron density of states. The VUV (10-200nm) discharge covers a useful range from 10 to 50 ev photon energy. The line width of excitation is generally a few mev, excellent for resolving molecular vibrational structures. UV excited photoelectron spectra could be used for a comparison with band structure calculations and (in comparison with XPS) providing some additional fingerprint information in surface chemical analysis. (ex. Determine Al 2 O 3, AlPO 4, Al 4 (P 4 O 12 ) 3 on a sample) Provides a high resolution valance band spectra compared to XPS for determining valance band on surfaces.

Reliability of dielectrics Reliability (aging) of the dielectric can be determined through both thermal stress and bias stress to determine method of failure. (large area features) The two regions for dielectric coverage have significantly different surface chemistries and structure. Identify key interface species/reactions that lead to stable passivation, isolation or field plates dielectric. Region 1 dielectric AlGaN Region 2 AlGaN GaN

Metal contact failure mechanism Ni/Au gate on HEMT after thermal failure 100.0n 50.0n Using AES (area = micron to submicron) one can easily determine certain metal contact failure mechanisms. Example: Ni/Au gate contact The Ni diffuses to the surface, leaving Au in contact with the AlGaN. Current 0.0-50.0n -100.0n -2-1 0 1 2 Voltage 25.0k 20.0k Ni Ga Fairly straight forward. Counts 15.0k 10.0k O Au Al 5.0k N 0.0 0 40 80 120 Sputter cycles

Metal contact failure mechanism Failure of Ohmic contacts not as easily understood using AES. Using AES one cannot determine the bonding state of the element, only the amount and depth position. Example: A low resistivity ohmic contact is a blending of the different metals. Cannot determine if TiN interface formed. Must use XPS. Good Ohmic Contact (Ir based) Atomic Concentration (%) Atomic Concentration (%) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 100 Au Ir O Sputter Depth (Å) Ir-Control Al Ti 0 0 1000 2000 3000 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 Al O Ir Au Ti Ga 0 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 Sputter Depth (Å) N Ir-900 o C Ga N

Identification of contamination Use of XPS can identify different sources of carbon contamination that are left behind from device processing. Characterization enhanced with UPS AES can only determine that C and O are present, but not the species or source. Counts/sec Counts/sec 30000 25000 20000 15000 10000 5000 C 1s acetone ipa copolymer mibk ipa 280 285 290 295 Binding energy (ev) O 1s acetone ipa copolymer mibk ipa 0 525 530 535 540 Binding energy (ev)

XPS/UPS Projected Milestones Year 1- Characterize operational and failed devices in the mesa isolation region. Determine changes in surface chemistry and work function. Correlate chemical/electrical changes. Year 2- Design test structures to be placed in the die cut lines. Apply test structures to the cut lines and investigate variations in surface chemistry from post field stressing. Year 3- Design in-situ bias stressing fixture for XPS-UPS. Characterize cut line test structures under bias stress using XPS-UPS. Identify degradation mechanism. Investigate reactions of semiconductor/passivation interface. Year 4- Real-time observation of near-surface changes during bias stressing. Year 5- Small spot size XPS capability for direct analysis on die

Electrostatic force microscopy - EFM Scan area in AFM Tapping mode, then apply a bias to the tip and scan in EFM mode. tip - - - - - - - - - Image of high aspect ratio EFM tip available from Veeco. EMF trace - - - - - - + + + + + - - - - - sample Veeco Dimension 3100 with Nanoscope V controller is currently installed in the MAIC facility

Electrostatic force microscopy - EFM Applied to pre and post aged devices to scan for variations of the electric field on the device surface. Examine defects propagating to the surface during testing, electromigration of gate metal in the gate-drain region, and increases in the surface potential from UV illumination emptying traps. Identify area for TEM/LEAP.

Electrostatic force microscopy - EFM Projected Milestones Year 1 Map the device surface of operational devices varying substrate bias and tip bias. Establish scan parameters for various compound semiconductor surfaces. Year 2 Map the device surface of failed devices and establish trends of failure in this region. Design probe cards for device biasing during scanning. Year 3 Correlate the failure mode to evolution of defects observed by TEM/LEAP. Incorporate defect generation and field profile into simulators. Year 4- Real-time imaging of devices during stressing Year 5-Establish limits of predictive forecast of reliability using short baisaging cycles.

xtra

High resolution XPS/UPS State of the art tools have <9um spot size and can build chemical maps of the surface Physical Electronics & Omicron High intensity monochromatic x-ray sources scan the surface. Sphera 60µm NanoESCA 650nm

Imaging Mode XPS/UPS Imaging at high kinetic electron energies. Ag evaporated on Cu, 35 µm field of view, 20 min acquisition time on Ag 3d5/2.

A 21st Century Approach to Reliability