BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND

Similar documents
^_ Key Observation Point Viewshed Model. Grazing Yak Solar Project. Key Observation Point Location Map KOP #6 KOP #3 KOP #1 KOP #2 KOP #4 KOP #5

Windsor Solar Project DRAFT Design and Operations Report APPENDIX D

SOLAR PHOTOVOLTAIC ENERGY FACILITIES: ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL FOR IMPACT ON AVIATION. January Report No.10/344/RPS/1

Glint and Glare Analysis

EE Properties of Sunlight. Y. Baghzouz Professor of Electrical Engineering

SAMPLE. SITE SPECIFIC WEATHER ANALYSIS Wind Report. Robinson, Smith & Walsh. John Smith REFERENCE:

A. My name is Watsun Randolph and my business address is 45 Horner Street Warrenton

AWOS Level Descriptions

Paine Field Airport Existing and Future Environmental Assessment, Initiation of Commercial Service Noise Analysis

May 22, Mr. Tim Tyler TRWME Properties, LLC 240 Hwy. 65 N Conway, AR RE: Royal Oaks Vista Subdivision Site. Dear Mr.

Solar photovoltaic energy production comparison of east, west, south-facing and tracked arrays

Centralized Forecasting Registration and Communication Requirements for Distribution Connected Variable Generators. IESO Training

SAMPLE. SITE SPECIFIC WEATHER ANALYSIS Wind Report. Robinson, Smith & Walsh. John Smith. July 1, 2017 REFERENCE: 1 Maple Street, Houston, TX 77034

Gleim Private Pilot FAA Knowledge Test 2015 Edition, 1st Printing Updates July 2015

El Paso Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.; Semi-Annual Activity Report Washington Ranch Storage Facility Docket Nos. RP72-6, et al.

Expedited Filing Draft August 22, 2017

2018 Annual Review of Availability Assessment Hours

A map is a small-scale flat-surface representation of some portion of the earth s surface.

June 26, Federal. Commissioners: Re: CP Pursuant to. the. Pursuant to. ordering

SUBJECT: Adjustments to Photovoltaic and Electric Vehicle Forecasts to be Used in Southern California Edison Company's Distribution Planning

SAMPLE. SITE SPECIFIC WEATHER ANALYSIS Rainfall Report. Bevins Engineering, Inc. Susan M. Benedict. July 1, 2017 REFERENCE:

Solar Time, Angles, and Irradiance Calculator: User Manual

Geologic Hazards Field Assessment

El Paso Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.; Semi-Annual Activity Report Washington Ranch Storage Facility Docket Nos. RP72-6, et al., CP79-224, and CP15-516

SAMPLE. SITE SPECIFIC WEATHER ANALYSIS Rainfall Report. Bevens Engineering, Inc. Susan M. Benedict REFERENCE:

NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD WASHINGTON, D.C. SAFETY RECOMMENDATION LETTER TO THE FAA dated NOVEMBER 21, 1994, AND RESPONSES.

Butte County Fire Department

EELE408 Photovoltaics Lecture 04: Apparent Motion of the Sum

Appendix A Zoning Ordinance

Sunlight and its Properties Part I. EE 446/646 Y. Baghzouz

Sunlight and its Properties II. EE 446/646 Y. Baghzouz

MICROLIGHT AIRWORTHINESS APPROVAL NOTE. MAAN NO: 1681 ISSUE 1 DATE: 1 April 2003

Purdue University Bifacial Module Calculator (PUB)

NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD Office of Research and Engineering Vehicle Performance Division (RE60) Washmgton, D.C

Optimizing Solar Field Layout Georg Brakmann, Miroslav Dolejsi SolEngCo GmbH

NABCEP Entry Level Exam Review Solfest practice test by Sean White

WIND DATA REPORT FOR THE YAKUTAT JULY 2004 APRIL 2005

FORENSIC WEATHER CONSULTANTS, LLC

Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation Compliance Filing in Docket No. RP05-369

APPENDIX G-7 METEROLOGICAL DATA

Re: Report on Yorktown Units I & 2 Operations Pursuant to Order No

ME 476 Solar Energy UNIT THREE SOLAR RADIATION

Modeling Energy Losses Due to Snow on PV Systems

Motion of the Sun. View Comments

Northern Alberta Institute of Technology

Bid Specifications Release Date: October 18, 2017 DESCRIPTION: Snow Plow Services

V. THE INTERACTIVE MAP

DAYLIGHT GLARE ANALYSIS FOR AN ALL GLASS CATHEDRAL: INTEGRATING SIMULATION WITH COMMON SENSE TO IMPROVE VISUAL COMFORT

Prediction of Capacity Factor for Near-Optimised Solar PV Systems in Sheffield, UK

SlimPulse FS Original Hole Ft August 12, 2017

APPLICATION TO AMEND THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP (FLUM) SMALL SCALE

METEOROLOGY PANEL (METP) WORKING GROUP- METEOROLOGICAL OPERATION GROUP (MOG) FIRST MEETING

Gnomon (a thin, round stick at least a foot long and capable of being put into the ground or stood up vertically)

The Spinning Earth Key Stage 2

AERODROMES PANEL (AP) VISUAL AIDS WORKING GROUP (VAWG) FIFTH MEETING. Montréal, Canada, 25 to 27 June 2008

APPENDIX C GLARE REPORT

GPS Worldwide Laboratory: a community of knowledge-seekers spanning the globe

Technical Requirements. Version No. 1.0 Effective Date 10/1/2008

Towards a Bankable Solar Resource

PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS DOCKET NO

SOUTHEAST PLANT POWER FEED AND PRIMARY SWITCHGEAR UPGRADES CIVIC DESIGN REVIEW - PHASE 1 - NOVEMBER 14, 2016

Navigation. Longitude and Latitude Foundations of Navigation. MTPs:

Hurricane Irma Page 1 HURRTRAK RM/Pro 2017 Summary Report for Tampa, FL 09/10/ EDT, Adv. # 46

RE: AFIN: ADEQ Reference #: WG-LA Well Site: Suarez-Gartner 8-12 No. 1-30H

Location Restrictions Certification Report NIPSCO Michigan City Generating Station Boiler Slag Pond

The Montague Doppler Radar, An Overview

Exercise 6. Solar Panel Orientation EXERCISE OBJECTIVE DISCUSSION OUTLINE. Introduction to the importance of solar panel orientation DISCUSSION

Remote Oceanic Meteorology Information Operational (ROMIO) Demonstration

PHOTOVOLTAIC SOLAR ENERGY TRAINER DL SOLAR-D1 Manual

Pearson Edexcel International Advanced Levels

AOPA. Mitigating Turbulence Impacts in Aviation Operations. General Aviation Perspective

Cartesian Coordinates Need two dimensional system 2 number lines perpendicular to each other X-axis is horizontal Y-axis is vertical Position relative

SCOPE: Outlines standard techniques for setting up and conducting voice communication and broadcasting ATIS at Hong Kong VACC

Lecture 9: Reference Maps & Aerial Photography

FIN STABILIZER OPERATIONS TRAINING COURSE

UNITED KINGDOM FOREIGN AND COMMONWEALTH OFFICE, DRAGON CAPITAL GROUP

Short-term Solar Forecasting

COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO. Plaintiff, Case No. CGC-16- Defendants. / Proceedings held on Tuesday, July 24, 2. Volume 15, Morning Session, before the

Lincoln County Board of Commissioner s Agenda Item Cover Sheet

CHAPTER 26 PLANNING AND ZONING ARTICLE XIV. AIRPORT OVERLAY ZONING

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA

NAME DATE TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS. Activity 1: Topographic Map Investigation I: More Than a Road Map

Butte County Fire Department

Re: Report on Yorktown Units 1 & 2 Operations Pursuant to Order No

Dr. Thomas A. Seliga

SCOPE: Outlines standard techniques for setting up and conducting voice communication and broadcasting ATIS at Hong Kong VACC

Services, inc. Re: Report on Yorktown Units 1 & 2 Operations Pursuant to Order Nos and

Three-Dimensional Aerial Zoning around a Lebanese Airport

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO * * * * *

SOUTHEAST PLANT POWER FEED AND PRIMARY SWITCHGEAR UPGRADES CIVIC DESIGN REVIEW - PHASE 1 - MAY 16, 2016

Photobiological Safety of Luminaires: Refining the New Approach

GIS SERVICE CENTER MAP ORDER FORM

LAPL(A)/PPL(A) question bank FCL.215, FCL.120 Rev_1/2016 NAVIGATION 060

NJ SURVEYORS CONFERENCE

CITY OF PAPILLION PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MAY 27, 2015 AGENDA 2015 ANNEXATION MISC

Tuesday, December 11th. To be handed in both as a hard copy (in my mailbox in LGRT 1127A) and on SPARK (as a turnitin assignment).

Near-Field Sturgeon Monitoring for the New NY Bridge at Tappan Zee. Quarterly Report October 1 December 31, 2014

INVESTIGATIONS ON SOLAR THERMAL PROCESS HEAT INTEGRATION WITH PARABOLIC TROUGH COLLECTORS

Comparison of Power Output Between Fixed and Perpendicular Solar Photovoltaic PV Panel in Tropical Climate Region

County of San Diego, Planning & Development Services

Transcription:

BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF * MASON DIXON SOLAR CENTER, LLC FOR A CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC * Case No.: 9426 CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY TO CONSTRUCT A 18.4 MW SOLAR * PHOTOVOLTAIC GENERATING FACILITY IN WASHINGTON COUNTY, MARYLAND * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * SUPPLEMENTAL DIRECT TESTIMONY OF RYAN GILCHRIST ON BEHALF OF MASON DIXON SOLAR CENTER, LLC November 10, 2016 5104053.1 49674/132367 11/09/2016

1 2 3 Q. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME, BUSINESS ADDRESS AND TITLE. A. My name is Ryan Gilchrist, Project Developer, Coronal Development Services, LLC, 321 East Main Street, Charlottesville, Virginia 22902. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Q. ARE YOU THE SAME RYAN GILCHRIST THAT SUBMITTED DIRECT TESTIMONY TO THE COMMISSION ON OCTOBER 20, 2016 IN THIS PROCEEDING? A. Yes, I am. Q. WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF YOUR SUPPLEMENTAL DIRECT TESTIMONY? A. The purpose of my supplemental direct testimony is to provide additional information for the record in this proceeding that further clarifies that the Mason Dixon Solar Project (the Project ) does not present a glare hazard to the Hagerstown Regional Airport. 12 13 14 15 Q. WHERE IS THE PROJECT LOCATED RELATIVE TO THE HAGERSTOWN REGIONAL AIRPORT? A. The Hagerstown Regional Airport is located approximately 3,200 feet southeast of the Project Site. 16 17 18 19 20 Q. DOES THE ERD SUBMITTED WITH MASON DIXON S APPLICATION FOR A CPCN IN THIS PROCEEDING INCLUDE INFORMATION ON GLARE? A. Yes, it does. Page 26 of the ERD states that Mason Dixon has corresponded with the Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA ) via submission of a FAA Form 7460-1. The glare analysis provided to the FAA is included as Attachment A to my supplemental 5104053.1 49674/132367 11/09/2016

1 2 3 4 direct testimony. 1 After performing analysis related to the Project s proposed height, location, and glare, the FAA issued Determination of No Hazard to Air Navigation letters to Mason Dixon corresponding to the boundary points of the Project. These letters are included as Appendix E to the ERD. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Q. DID MASON DIXON PERFORM ANY ADDITIONAL OUTREACH TO FURTHER CONFIRM THE PROJECT WILL HAVE NO GLARE IMPACT ON THE HAGERSTOWN REGIONAL AIRPORT? Yes, it did. Mason Dixon sought a determination from the Maryland Department of Transportation Aviation Administration ( MAA ) that the Project will not present a glare hazard to the Hagerstown Regional Airport. After its review, MAA determined the Project presents no solar glare hazards for any of [the] runway approaches at Hagerstown Regional Airport and thus would not be an obstruction or hazard to air navigation. The correspondence from MAA confirming this conclusion in included as Attachment B to my supplemental direct testimony. 15 16 17 18 19 Additionally, Mason Dixon provided glare studies to and sought input from the Hagerstown Regional Airport, which also received a copy of MAA s determination. As indicated in the email correspondence included as Attachment C to my supplemental direct testimony, based on this information the Hagerstown Regional Airport does not object to the Project for any reason, including on the basis of glare impacts. 20 21 22 Q. DO THESE CORRESPONDENCES INDICATE THAT THE PROJECT DOES NOT PRESENT A GLARE HAZARD TO THE HAGERSTOWN REGIONAL AIRPORT? 1 All glare analysis for the project utilized the Project s proposed single-axis tracking configuration. 5104053.1 49674/132367 11/09/2016

1 2 Yes. These correspondences indicate that the Project does not present a glare hazard to the Hagerstown Regional Airport. 3 4 Q. DOES THIS CONCLUDE YOUR SUPPLEMENTAL DIRECT TESTIMONY? A. Yes, it does. 5104053.1 49674/132367 11/09/2016

5104053.1 49674/132367 11/09/2016 RG-3 Attachment A

Solar Glare Hazard Analysis Flight Path Report Generated Dec. 14, 2015, 11:19 a.m. Flight path: Runway 2 No glare found! Print 1 of 5 12/14/15, 1:19 PM

Analysis & PV array parameters Analysis name Mason Dixon 2 PV array axis tracking single Tilt of tracking axis (deg) 0.0 Orientation of tracking axis (deg) 0.0 Offset angle of module (deg) 0.0 Limit rotation angle? True Maximum tracking angle (deg) 52.0 Rated power (kw) 15000.0 Vary reflectivity PV surface material True Smooth glass without ARC Timezone offset -5.0 Subtended angle of sun (mrad) 9.3 Peak DNI (W/m^2) 1000.0 Ocular transmission coefficient 0.5 Pupil diameter (m) 0.002 Eye focal length (m) 0.017 Time interval (min) 1 Correlate slope error with material False Slope error (mrad) 10.0 Flight path parameters Direction (deg) 15.88 2 of 5 12/14/15, 1:19 PM

Glide slope (deg) 3.0 Consider pilot visibility from cockpit False 3 of 5 12/14/15, 1:19 PM

PV array vertices id Latitude (deg) Longitude (deg) Ground Elevation Height of panels above ground Total elevation 1 39.7212790291-77.751789093 563.35 10.0 573.35 2 39.7212790291-77.7451372147 589.73 10.0 599.73 3 39.7208693061-77.7452123165 583.59 10.0 593.59 4 39.7206877561-77.7446973324 592.84 10.0 602.84 5 39.7177324111-77.7455234528 607.27 10.0 617.27 6 39.7121019544-77.7485275269 599.85 10.0 609.85 7 39.7127292034-77.75578022 558.76 10.0 568.76 8 39.7204207933-77.754278183 567.19 10.0 577.19 9 39.7199916714-77.7521753311 562.17 10.0 572.17 Flight Path Observation Points Latitude (deg) Longitude (deg) Ground Elevation Eye-level height above ground Glare? Threshold 39.7050661969-77.7284431458 681.76 50.0 No 1/4 mi 39.701590365-77.7297299082 671.68 129.26 No 1/2 mi 39.6981145332-77.7310166707 668.13 202.0 No 3/4 mi 39.6946387014-77.7323034332 668.11 271.18 No 1 mi 39.6911628696-77.7335901957 658.58 349.89 No 1 1/4 mi 39.6876870378-77.7348769582 646.63 431.03 No 1 1/2 mi 39.684211206-77.7361637207 641.76 505.07 No 1 3/4 mi 39.6807353741-77.7374504832 627.31 588.7 No 4 of 5 12/14/15, 1:19 PM

Latitude (deg) Longitude (deg) Ground Elevation Eye-level height above ground Glare? 2 mi 39.6772595423-77.7387372457 626.28 658.91 No No glare found. 1997-2014 Sandia Corporation 5 of 5 12/14/15, 1:19 PM

Solar Glare Hazard Analysis Flight Path Report Generated Dec. 14, 2015, 11:01 a.m. Flight path: Runway 9 Approach from SW No glare found! Print 1 of 5 12/14/15, 1:03 PM

Analysis & PV array parameters Analysis name PV array axis tracking Mason Dixon single Tilt of tracking axis (deg) 0.0 Orientation of tracking axis (deg) 0.0 Offset angle of module (deg) 0.0 Limit rotation angle? True Maximum tracking angle (deg) 52.0 Rated power (kw) 15000.0 Vary reflectivity PV surface material True Smooth glass without ARC Timezone offset -5.0 Subtended angle of sun (mrad) 9.3 Peak DNI (W/m^2) 1000.0 Ocular transmission coefficient 0.5 Pupil diameter (m) 0.002 Eye focal length (m) 0.017 Time interval (min) 1 Correlate slope error with material False Slope error (mrad) 10.0 Flight path parameters Direction (deg) 80.39 2 of 5 12/14/15, 1:03 PM

Glide slope (deg) 3.0 Consider pilot visibility from cockpit True Max downward viewing angle (deg) 30.0 Azimuthal viewing angle (deg) 90.0 3 of 5 12/14/15, 1:03 PM

PV array vertices id Latitude (deg) Longitude (deg) Ground Elevation Height of panels above ground Total elevation 1 39.7212790291-77.751789093 563.35 10.0 573.35 2 39.7212790291-77.7451372147 589.73 10.0 599.73 3 39.7208693061-77.7452123165 583.59 10.0 593.59 4 39.7206877561-77.7446973324 592.84 10.0 602.84 5 39.7177324111-77.7455234528 607.27 10.0 617.27 6 39.7121019544-77.7485275269 599.85 10.0 609.85 7 39.7127292034-77.75578022 558.76 10.0 568.76 8 39.7204207933-77.754278183 567.19 10.0 577.19 9 39.7199916714-77.7521753311 562.17 10.0 572.17 Flight Path Observation Points Latitude (deg) Longitude (deg) Ground Elevation Eye-level height above ground Glare? Threshold 39.7072672699-77.7361035347 659.62 50.0 No 1/4 mi 39.7066639885-77.7407403651 644.85 133.94 No 1/2 mi 39.7060607071-77.7453771955 630.32 217.66 No 3/4 mi 39.7054574258-77.7500140259 595.23 321.93 No 1 mi 39.7048541444-77.7546508562 579.3 407.03 No 1 1/4 mi 39.7042508631-77.7592876866 548.69 506.83 No 1 1/2 mi 39.7036475817-77.763924517 556.93 567.76 No 1 3/4 mi 39.7030443004-77.7685613474 511.2 682.68 No 4 of 5 12/14/15, 1:03 PM

Latitude (deg) Longitude (deg) Ground Elevation Eye-level height above ground Glare? 2 mi 39.702441019-77.7731981778 499.75 763.3 No No glare found. 1997-2014 Sandia Corporation 5 of 5 12/14/15, 1:03 PM

Solar Glare Hazard Analysis Flight Path Report Generated Dec. 14, 2015, 11:19 a.m. Flight path: Runway 20 No glare found! Print 1 of 5 12/14/15, 1:19 PM

Analysis & PV array parameters Analysis name Mason Dixon 2 PV array axis tracking single Tilt of tracking axis (deg) 0.0 Orientation of tracking axis (deg) 0.0 Offset angle of module (deg) 0.0 Limit rotation angle? True Maximum tracking angle (deg) 52.0 Rated power (kw) 15000.0 Vary reflectivity PV surface material True Smooth glass without ARC Timezone offset -5.0 Subtended angle of sun (mrad) 9.3 Peak DNI (W/m^2) 1000.0 Ocular transmission coefficient 0.5 Pupil diameter (m) 0.002 Eye focal length (m) 0.017 Time interval (min) 1 Correlate slope error with material False Slope error (mrad) 10.0 Flight path parameters Direction (deg) 194.74 2 of 5 12/14/15, 1:19 PM

Glide slope (deg) 3.0 Consider pilot visibility from cockpit True Max downward viewing angle (deg) 30.0 Azimuthal viewing angle (deg) 90.0 3 of 5 12/14/15, 1:19 PM

PV array vertices id Latitude (deg) Longitude (deg) Ground Elevation Height of panels above ground Total elevation 1 39.7212790291-77.751789093 563.35 10.0 573.35 2 39.7212790291-77.7451372147 589.73 10.0 599.73 3 39.7208693061-77.7452123165 583.59 10.0 593.59 4 39.7206877561-77.7446973324 592.84 10.0 602.84 5 39.7177324111-77.7455234528 607.27 10.0 617.27 6 39.7121019544-77.7485275269 599.85 10.0 609.85 7 39.7127292034-77.75578022 558.76 10.0 568.76 8 39.7204207933-77.754278183 567.19 10.0 577.19 9 39.7199916714-77.7521753311 562.17 10.0 572.17 Flight Path Observation Points Latitude (deg) Longitude (deg) Ground Elevation Eye-level height above ground Glare? Threshold 39.711242505-77.7263081074 685.38 50.0 No 1/4 mi 39.7147373216-77.7251114837 702.53 102.03 No 1/2 mi 39.7182321381-77.7239148599 720.85 152.89 No 3/4 mi 39.7217269547-77.7227182362 706.46 236.46 No 1 mi 39.7252217712-77.7215216125 721.24 290.84 No 1 1/4 mi 39.7287165877-77.7203249888 704.2 377.08 No 1 1/2 mi 39.7322114043-77.719128365 721.19 429.26 No 1 3/4 mi 39.7357062208-77.7179317413 709.95 509.69 No 4 of 5 12/14/15, 1:19 PM

Latitude (deg) Longitude (deg) Ground Elevation Eye-level height above ground Glare? 2 mi 39.7392010374-77.7167351176 702.26 586.55 No No glare found. 1997-2014 Sandia Corporation 5 of 5 12/14/15, 1:19 PM

Solar Glare Hazard Analysis Flight Path Report Generated Dec. 14, 2015, 11:03 a.m. Flight path: Runway 27 Approach from NE No glare found! Print 1 of 5 12/14/15, 1:03 PM

Analysis & PV array parameters Analysis name PV array axis tracking Mason Dixon single Tilt of tracking axis (deg) 0.0 Orientation of tracking axis (deg) 0.0 Offset angle of module (deg) 0.0 Limit rotation angle? True Maximum tracking angle (deg) 52.0 Rated power (kw) 15000.0 Vary reflectivity PV surface material True Smooth glass without ARC Timezone offset -5.0 Subtended angle of sun (mrad) 9.3 Peak DNI (W/m^2) 1000.0 Ocular transmission coefficient 0.5 Pupil diameter (m) 0.002 Eye focal length (m) 0.017 Time interval (min) 1 Correlate slope error with material False Slope error (mrad) 10.0 Flight path parameters Direction (deg) 260.27 2 of 5 12/14/15, 1:03 PM

Glide slope (deg) 3.0 Consider pilot visibility from cockpit True Max downward viewing angle (deg) 30.0 Azimuthal viewing angle (deg) 90.0 3 of 5 12/14/15, 1:03 PM

PV array vertices id Latitude (deg) Longitude (deg) Ground Elevation Height of panels above ground Total elevation 1 39.7212790291-77.751789093 563.35 10.0 573.35 2 39.7212790291-77.7451372147 589.73 10.0 599.73 3 39.7208693061-77.7452123165 583.59 10.0 593.59 4 39.7206877561-77.7446973324 592.84 10.0 602.84 5 39.7177324111-77.7455234528 607.27 10.0 617.27 6 39.7121019544-77.7485275269 599.85 10.0 609.85 7 39.7127292034-77.75578022 558.76 10.0 568.76 8 39.7204207933-77.754278183 567.19 10.0 577.19 9 39.7199916714-77.7521753311 562.17 10.0 572.17 Flight Path Observation Points Latitude (deg) Longitude (deg) Ground Elevation Eye-level height above ground Glare? Threshold 39.7096644338-77.7174139023 681.54 50.0 No 1/4 mi 39.7102751762-77.7127785653 660.93 139.78 No 1/2 mi 39.7108859187-77.7081432283 627.72 242.19 No 3/4 mi 39.7114966611-77.7035078914 597.91 341.17 No 1 mi 39.7121074035-77.6988725544 653.45 354.79 No 1 1/4 mi 39.7127181459-77.6942372174 640.24 437.19 No 1 1/2 mi 39.7133288884-77.6896018804 619.69 526.92 No 1 3/4 mi 39.7139396308-77.6849665435 604.26 611.54 No 4 of 5 12/14/15, 1:03 PM

Latitude (deg) Longitude (deg) Ground Elevation Eye-level height above ground Glare? 2 mi 39.7145503732-77.6803312065 567.71 717.26 No No glare found. 1997-2014 Sandia Corporation 5 of 5 12/14/15, 1:03 PM

5104053.1 49674/132367 11/09/2016 RG-3 Attachment B

5104053.1 49674/132367 11/09/2016 RG-3 Attachment C

From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Ridenour, Phil <PRidenou@washco-md.net> Wednesday, November 09, 2016 10:50 AM 'Ben Combs' Kroboth, Kathy RE: Mason Dixon Solar Center - Hagerstown Regional Airport Correspondence Good morning Ben, Hagerstown Regional Airport has no objection to the Mason Dixon, LLC solar fam installation. Federal Aviation Administration as well as Maryland Aviation Administration find no objections so accordingly, we have none as well. Best of luck with your project and we appreciate your correspondence! Regards, Phil From: Ben Combs [mailto:bcombs@coronalgroup.com] Sent: Thursday, November 3, 2016 4:11 PM To: Ridenour, Phil Subject: FW: Mason Dixon Solar Center - Hagerstown Regional Airport Correspondence Mr. Ridenour, Thank you for returning my call this afternoon. As discussed, please find attached the glare analyses for the Mason Dixon Solar Center, which is located about 0.5 miles West of the Hagerstown Regional Airport. We performed the analyses for each flight approach path corresponding to the two active runways at the facility. Included as well are the following supplements: Mason Dixon Solar Center Project Summary USGS map depicting location in relation to Hagerstown Regional Airport 4 x FAA Approvals stating ³No Hazard to Air Navigation² for each of the project boundary points If you have any additional questions, please feel free to reach out to me directly. 1

Best regards, Ben Ben Combs Senior Project Engineer Coronal Development Services P 434 446 1459 C 434 962 5122 bcombs@coronalgroup.com Charlottesville Los Angeles New York Newark San Francisco Click here to learn more about Coronal Group and Panasonic 2