Overview. Overview Page 1 of 8

Similar documents
General. Eqn. 1. where, F b-bbf = Allowable bending stress at the bottom of the beam bottom flange, ksi.

MECHANICS OF MATERIALS Poisson s Ratio

Pressure Vessels Thin and Thick-Walled Stress Analysis

Combined Bending with Induced or Applied Torsion of FRP I-Section Beams

This Technical Note describes how the program calculates the moment capacity of a noncomposite steel beam, including a cover plate, if applicable.

Orthotropic Materials

BUCKLING AND ULTIMATE STRENGTH ASSESSMENT FOR OFFSHORE STRUCTURES

Sections 3.1 and 3.4 Exponential Functions (Growth and Decay)

Heat Conduction Problem in a Thick Circular Plate and its Thermal Stresses due to Ramp Type Heating

Chapter Finite Difference Method for Ordinary Differential Equations

Additional Exercises for Chapter What is the slope-intercept form of the equation of the line given by 3x + 5y + 2 = 0?

Department of Chemical Engineering University of Tennessee Prof. David Keffer. Course Lecture Notes SIXTEEN

Made by AAT Date June Checked by JEK Date June Revised by JBL/MEB Date April 2006

CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING THE OPTIMUM DESIGN OF PRESTRESSED ELEMENTS

PHYS PRACTICE EXAM 2

Lecture 18: Kinetics of Phase Growth in a Two-component System: general kinetics analysis based on the dilute-solution approximation

7.2.1 Basic relations for Torsion of Circular Members

Computer Propagation Analysis Tools


Constant Acceleration

Pseudosteady-State Flow Relations for a Radial System from Department of Petroleum Engineering Course Notes (1997)

Probabilistic Models. CS 188: Artificial Intelligence Fall Independence. Example: Independence. Example: Independence? Conditional Independence

KINEMATICS OF RIGID BODIES

seventeen steel construction: columns & tension members ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2014 lecture

Circular Motion. Radians. One revolution is equivalent to which is also equivalent to 2π radians. Therefore we can.

CHEMISTRY 047 STUDY PACKAGE

Physics 201 Lecture 18

Comparison between the Discrete and Continuous Time Models

ME311 Machine Design

NUMERICAL SIMULATION FOR NONLINEAR STATIC & DYNAMIC STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Mathematics Paper- II

02. MOTION. Questions and Answers

Water Tunnel Experiment MAE 171A/175A. Objective:

EN221 - Fall HW # 7 Solutions

, on the power of the transmitter P t fed to it, and on the distance R between the antenna and the observation point as. r r t

BENDING OF BEAM. Compressed layer. Elongated. layer. Un-strained. layer. NA= Neutral Axis. Compression. Unchanged. Elongation. Two Dimensional View

IB Physics Kinematics Worksheet

ANALYSIS OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDINGS IN FIRE

THE CATCH PROCESS (continued)

MECHANICS OF MATERIALS Poisson s Ratio

STUDY OF THE STRESS-STRENGTH RELIABILITY AMONG THE PARAMETERS OF GENERALIZED INVERSE WEIBULL DISTRIBUTION

Lecture 4 Kinetics of a particle Part 3: Impulse and Momentum

The sudden release of a large amount of energy E into a background fluid of density

7 Wave Equation in Higher Dimensions

DESIGN OF TENSION MEMBERS

Stability of an ideal (flat) plate. = k. critical stresses σ* (or N*) take the. Thereof infinitely many solutions: Critical stresses are given as:

CH.7. PLANE LINEAR ELASTICITY. Continuum Mechanics Course (MMC) - ETSECCPB - UPC

MATHEMATICAL FOUNDATIONS FOR APPROXIMATING PARTICLE BEHAVIOUR AT RADIUS OF THE PLANCK LENGTH

2CO8 Advanced design of steel and composite structures Lectures: Machacek (M), Netusil (N), Wald (W), Ungureanu (U)

CS537. Numerical Analysis

What Ties Return Volatilities to Price Valuations and Fundamentals? On-Line Appendix

Two-dimensional Effects on the CSR Interaction Forces for an Energy-Chirped Bunch. Rui Li, J. Bisognano, R. Legg, and R. Bosch

4. Torsion Open and closed cross sections, simple St. Venant and warping torsion, interaction of bending and torsion, Eurocode approach.

û s L u t 0 s a ; i.e., û s 0

Molecular Evolution and Phylogeny. Based on: Durbin et al Chapter 8

r P + '% 2 r v(r) End pressures P 1 (high) and P 2 (low) P 1 , which must be independent of z, so # dz dz = P 2 " P 1 = " #P L L,

TRANSILVANIA UNIVERSITY OF BRASOV MECHANICAL ENGINEERING FACULTY DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING ONLY FOR STUDENTS

Numerical solution of fuzzy differential equations by Milne s predictor-corrector method and the dependency problem

V.sin. AIM: Investigate the projectile motion of a rigid body. INTRODUCTION:

MEEN 617 Handout #11 MODAL ANALYSIS OF MDOF Systems with VISCOUS DAMPING

PSAT/NMSQT PRACTICE ANSWER SHEET SECTION 3 EXAMPLES OF INCOMPLETE MARKS COMPLETE MARK B C D B C D B C D B C D B C D 13 A B C D B C D 11 A B C D B C D

CS 188: Artificial Intelligence Fall Probabilistic Models

PHYS GENERAL RELATIVITY AND COSMOLOGY PROBLEM SET 7 - SOLUTIONS

ÖRNEK 1: THE LINEAR IMPULSE-MOMENTUM RELATION Calculate the linear momentum of a particle of mass m=10 kg which has a. kg m s

2015 Practice Test #1

Design Beam Flexural Reinforcement

The plastic moment capacity of a composite cross-section is calculated in the program on the following basis (BS 4.4.2):

Representing Knowledge. CS 188: Artificial Intelligence Fall Properties of BNs. Independence? Reachability (the Bayes Ball) Example

Lecture 5. Chapter 3. Electromagnetic Theory, Photons, and Light

Steel members come in a wide variety of shapes; the properties of the cross section are needed for analysis and design. (Bob Scott/Getty Images)

CSE590B Lecture 4 More about P 1

See the solution to Prob Ans. Since. (2E t + 2E c )ch - a. (s max ) t. (s max ) c = 2E c. 2E c. (s max ) c = 3M bh 2E t + 2E c. 2E t. h c.

Thermal-Fluids I. Chapter 17 Steady heat conduction. Dr. Primal Fernando Ph: (850)

Lecture 17: Kinetics of Phase Growth in a Two-component System:

DESIGN OF BEAMS FOR MOMENTS

The Production of Polarization

( ) ( ) Last Time. 3-D particle in box: summary. Modified Bohr model. 3-dimensional Hydrogen atom. Orbital magnetic dipole moment

Second-Order Differential Equations

Wind Tunnel Experiment MAE 171A/175A. Objective:

ME 210 Applied Mathematics for Mechanical Engineers

Today - Lecture 13. Today s lecture continue with rotations, torque, Note that chapters 11, 12, 13 all involve rotations

Static equilibrium requires a balance of forces and a balance of moments.

Construction Figure 10.1: Jaw clutches

Variance and Covariance Processes

Ex: An object is released from rest. Find the proportion of its displacements during the first and second seconds. y. g= 9.8 m/s 2

General Non-Arbitrage Model. I. Partial Differential Equation for Pricing A. Traded Underlying Security

City of Ottumwa. Sewer System

Capacitance Extraction. Classification (orthogonal to 3D/2D)

GCSE: Volumes and Surface Area

Fundamental Vehicle Loads & Their Estimation

Motion along a Straight Line

At the end of this lesson, the students should be able to understand

1 1 + x 2 dx. tan 1 (2) = ] ] x 3. Solution: Recall that the given integral is improper because. x 3. 1 x 3. dx = lim dx.

Process model for the design of bent 3-dimensional free-form geometries for the three-roll-push-bending process

Elastic-Plastic Deformation of a Rotating Solid Disk of Exponentially Varying Thickness and Exponentially Varying Density

Right-handed screw dislocation in an isotropic solid

[ ] 0. = (2) = a q dimensional vector of observable instrumental variables that are in the information set m constituents of u

Influence of High Axial Tension on the Shear Strength of non-shear RC Beams

Our main purpose in this section is to undertake an examination of the stock

Buckling of a structure means failure due to excessive displacements (loss of structural stiffness), and/or

Transcription:

COMPUTERS AND STRUCTURES, INC., BERKELEY, CALIORNIA DECEMBER 2001 COMPOSITE BEAM DESIGN AISC-LRD93 Tecnical Noe Compac and Noncompac Requiemens Tis Tecnical Noe descibes o e pogam cecks e AISC-LRD93 specificaion equiemens fo compac and noncompac beams. Te basic compac and noncompac equiemens cecked ae in AISC-LRD93 specificaion Cape B, Table B5.1. Te pogam cecks e id-o-ickness aios of e beam compession flange, beam eb, and, if i exiss and is in compession, e cove plae. Wen a singl smmeic beam is designed fo noncomposie beavio, i is also cecked fo laeal osional buckling equiemens. Ovevie Te pogam classifies beam secions as eie compac, noncompac o slende. I cecks e compac and noncompac secion equiemens a eac design locaion along e beam fo eac design load combinaion sepaael. A beam secion ma be classified diffeenl fo diffeen design load combinaions. o example, a beam ma be classified as compac fo design load combinaion A and as noncompac fo design load combinaion B. To easons a a beam ma be classified diffeenl fo diffeen design load cases ae:! Te compac secion equiemens fo beam ebs depend on e axial load in e beam. Diffeen design load combinaions ma poduce diffeen axial loads in e beam. Tis is onl an issue en beam axial loads ae specified o be consideed in e composie beam analsis and design.! Te compession flange ma be diffeen fo diffeen design load combinaions. If e sizes of e op and boom flanges ae no e same, classificaion of e secion ma depend on ic flange is deemined o be e compession flange. A eac design locaion, fo eac design load combinaion, e pogam fis cecks a beam secion fo e compac secion equiemens fo e compession flange, eb, cove plae (if applicable) and laeal osional buckling (if Ovevie Page 1 of 8

Composie Beam Design AISC-LRD93 Compac and Noncompac Requiemens applicable) descibed eein. If e beam secion mees all of ose equiemens, i is classified as compac fo a design load combinaion. If e beam secion does no mee all of e compac secion equiemens, i is cecked fo e noncompac equiemens fo e flanges, eb, cove plae (if applicable) and laeal osional buckling (if applicable) descibed eein. If e beam secion mees all of ose equiemens, i is classified as noncompac fo a design load combinaion. If e beam secion does no mee all of e noncompac secion equiemens, i is classified as slende fo a design load combinaion and e pogam does no conside i fo composie beam design. Limiing Wid-o-Tickness Raios fo langes Tis secion descibes e limiing id-o-ickness aios consideed b e pogam fo beam compession flanges. Te id-o-ickness aio fo flanges is denoed b/, and is equal o b f /2 f fo I-saped secions and b f / f fo cannel secions. Compac Secion Limis fo langes o compac secions, e id-o-ickness aio fo e compession flange is limied o a indicaed b Equaion 1. b 65, fo compac secions Eqn. 1 f ee f is e specified ield sess of e flange consideed. Equaion 1 applies o bo olled secions seleced fom e pogam's daabase and o use-defined secions. Noncompac Secion Limis fo langes I-Saped Rolled Beams and Cannels o noncompac I-saped olled beams and cannels, e id-o-ickness aio fo e compession flange is limied o a indicaed b Equaion 2. b 141, fo noncompac secions Eqn. 2-10 ee is e specified ield sess of e beam o cannel. Limiing Wid-o-Tickness Raios fo langes Page 2 of 8

Composie Beam Design AISC-LRD93 Compac and Noncompac Requiemens Use-Defined and Hbid Beams o noncompac use-defined and bid beams, e id-o-ickness aio fo e compession flange is limied o a indicaed b Equaion 3. b 162, fo noncompac secions Eqn. 3 f - 16.5 k c ee f is e ield sess of e compession flange and, k c = 4 bu no less an 0.35 k c 0.763 Eqn. 4 Limiing Wid-o-Tickness Raios fo Webs Tis secion descibes e limiing id-o-ickness aios consideed b e pogam fo beam ebs. Compac Secion Limis fo Webs Wen cecking a beam eb fo compac secion equiemens, e id-oickness aio used is /. Te equaion used fo cecking e compac secion limis in e eb depends on e magniude of e axial compession sess aio, (P u / φ b P ) in e beam. Wen calculaing e axial compession sess aio, e folloing o ules ae used:! Te pogam akes P as A s fo olled secions and b f-op f-op f-op + + b f-bo f-bo f-bo fo use-defined secions.! Te pogam uses φ b = 0.85 if a plasic sess disibuion is used fo momen and φ b = 0.9 if an elasic sess disibuion is used fo momen.! Te pogam compues e axial compession sess aio (P u / φ b P ) based on e aea of e seel beam alone no including e cove plae, even if i exiss, and no including e concee slab. Wen (P u / φ b P ) 0.125, Equaion 5a defines e compac secion limi fo ebs. Wen (P u / φ b P ) > 0.125, Equaion 5b defines e compac secion limi fo ebs. Limiing Wid-o-Tickness Raios fo Webs Page 3 of 8

Composie Beam Design AISC-LRD93 Compac and Noncompac Requiemens 640 2.75P P 1 u u, en P φ b φbp 0.125 Eqn. 5a 191 P u 253 2.33, P φb Pu en > 0.125 φ P b Eqn. 5b In Equaions 5a and 5b, e value of used is e lages of e values fo e beam flanges and e eb. If ee is no axial foce, o if ee is axial ension onl (i.e., no axial compessive foce), onl Equaion 5a applies. Noncompac Secion Limis fo Webs Wen cecking a beam eb of a beam fo noncompac secion equiemens, e id-o-ickness aio cecked is /. Te noncompac secion limis depend on ee e flanges of e beam ae of equal o unequal size. Beams i Equal Sized langes Equaion 6 defines e noncompac secion limi fo ebs in beams i equal sized flanges. 970 0.74P 1 φ b P u Eqn. 6 In Equaion 6, e value of used is e lages of e values fo e beam flanges and e eb. Beams i Unequal Sized langes Equaion 7 defines e noncompac secion limi fo ebs in beams i unequal sized flanges Limiing Wid-o-Tickness Raios fo Webs Page 4 of 8

Composie Beam Design AISC-LRD93 Compac and Noncompac Requiemens ee, 253 1 + 2.83 3 4 c c 0.74P 1 φ b P 3 2 u, Eqn. 7 In Equaion 7, e value of used is e lages of e values fo e beam flanges and e eb. Equaion 7 is Equaion A-B5-1 in e AISC-LRD93 specificaion. Limiing Wid-o-Tickness Raios fo Cove Plaes Te id-o-ickness cecks made fo e cove plae depend on e id of e cove plae compaed o e id of e beam boom flange. igue 1 illusaes e condiions consideed. In Case A of e figue, e id of e cove plae is less an o equal o e id of e beam boom flange. In a case, e id-o-ickness aio is aken as b 1 / cp, and i is cecked as a flange cove plae. In Case B of igue 1, e id of e cove plae is geae an e id of e beam boom flange. To condiions ae cecked in a case. Te fis condiion is e same as a son in Case A, ee e id-o-ickness aio is aken as b 1 / cp and is cecked as a flange cove plae. Te second condiion cecked in Case B akes b 2 / cp as e id-o-ickness aio and cecks i as a plae pojecing fom a beam. Tis second condiion is onl cecked fo e noncompac equiemens; i is no cecked fo compac equiemens. Compac Secion Limis fo Cove Plaes o bo cases A and B son in igue 1, e cove plae is cecked fo compac secion equiemens as son in Equaion 8. b1 190 Eqn. 8 cp cp ee b 1 is defined in igue 1. Limiing Wid-o-Tickness Raios fo Cove Plaes Page 5 of 8

Composie Beam Design AISC-LRD93 Compac and Noncompac Requiemens Beam Beam Cove plae b 1 cp b 2 b 1 b 2 cp Cove plae Case A Case B igue 1: Condiions Consideed Wen Cecking Wid-o-Tickness Raios of Cove Plaes Noncompac Secion Limis fo Cove Plaes Te cecks made fo noncompac secion equiemens depend on ee e id of e cove plae is less an o equal o a of e boom flange of e beam, Case A in igue 1, o geae an a of e boom flange of e beam, Case B in igue 1. Cove Plae Wid Beam Boom lange Wid Wen e cove plae id is less an o equal o e id of e beam boom flange, Equaion 9 applies fo e noncompac ceck fo e cove plae. b1 238 Eqn. 9 cp cp Te em b 1 in Equaion 9 is defined in igue 1. Limiing Wid-o-Tickness Raios fo Cove Plaes Page 6 of 8

Composie Beam Design AISC-LRD93 Compac and Noncompac Requiemens Cove Plae Wid > Beam Boom lange Wid Wen e cove plae id exceeds e id of e beam boom flange, bo Equaions 9 and 10 appl fo e noncompac ceck fo e cove plae. b 2 95 Eqn. 10 cp cp Te em b 2 in Equaion 10 is defined in igue 1. Laeal Tosional Buckling Wen a singl smmeic beam is designed fo noncomposie beavio, i is cecked fo laeal osional buckling equiemens. If e singl smmeic beam is unsoed, is ceck occus fo an consucion design load case. I also occus fo beams a ave negaive bending a ae no specified o conside e composie acion povided b e slab eba. inall, e ceck occus fo an singl smmeic beam specified o be noncomposie. Wen evieing fo laeal osional buckling equiemens, e value of L b / c is cecked. L b is e laeall unbaced leng of beam; a is, e leng beeen poins a ae baced agains laeal displacemen of e compession flange. Te em c is adius of gaion of e compession flange abou e -axis. Compac Limis fo Laeal Tosional Buckling Te compac secion limi fo laeal osional buckling is given in Equaion 11. Lb 300 Eqn. 11 c f In Equaion 11 e em f is e ield sess of e compession flange. Noncompac Limis fo Laeal Tosional Buckling Te noncompac secion limi fo laeal osional buckling is given in Equaion 12. * L b L b Eqn. 12 c c Laeal Tosional Buckling Page 7 of 8

Composie Beam Design AISC-LRD93 Compac and Noncompac Requiemens * ee L b is e value of L b fo ic M c, as defined b Equaions 13a oug 13c, is equal o M, as defined b Equaions 14a and 14b. Te fomula fo M c given in Equaions 13a oug 13c is aken fom AISC- LRD93 Table A-1.1, foonoe (e). Te value of C b is aken as 1 as specified in e Table. ee, M B 1 c = ( 57000)( 1) L b I J B1 + 1 + B2 + B 2 1 Eqn. 13a I c I = 2.25 2 1 Eqn. 13b I L b J B 2 2 I c I c 25 1 I J L = Eqn. 13c b Te fomula fo M given in Equaions 14a and 14b is aken fom AISC- LRD93 Table A-1.1. M = S S Eqn. 14a L xc f x ee, L = smalle of ( ) and Eqn. 14b f In Equaion 14a, f is e ield sess of e ension flange. In Equaion 14b, f is e ield sess of e compession flange. Te oe ems ae defined in e noaion in Tecnical Noe Geneal and Noaion Composie Beam Design AISC-LRD93. Laeal Tosional Buckling Page 8 of 8