Advising and Advice at Cal: What do Undergraduates Tell Us?

Similar documents
NERCHE Self-Assessment Rubric for the Institutionalization of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Higher Education

COMMISSION ON ACCREDITATION 2017 ANNUAL REPORT ONLINE

Report for the Masters of Counseling at Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary Hamilton

PROGRAM EVALUATION PRELIMINARY REPORT. The following information is organized by program specialty areas for

Academic Affairs Assessment of Student Learning Report for Academic Year

Appendix B: Undergraduate Academic Interests Survey Spring 2009

PRESENTATION TITLE. Undeclared Students Paths to Major Declaration: A Data Mining Study. Afshin Karimi Sunny Moon, PhD Joshua Loudon Brian Stern

PROGRAM EVALUATION REPORT The following information is organized by CACREP-Accredited Program Specialty Areas for

Discounts & Scholarships Tuition discount rate

University of Wisconsin Madison Department of Chemistry. Curriculum Guide for Chemistry Majors

Low-Income African American Women's Perceptions of Primary Care Physician Weight Loss Counseling: A Positive Deviance Study

Enrollment at a Glance Fall 2015

Energy and U.S. Consumers

M A K I N G E X C E L L E N C E I N C L U S I V E

Advancing Green Chemistry Practices in Business

4. 1. PROGRAM: Architectural Technology CODE: A40100 DEGREE: Associate in Applied Science DESCRIPTION/PURPOSE

Orientation and New Student Program Survey with Benchmark

Ticketed Sessions 1 Information in this list current as of August 2008

GOVERNMENT MAPPING WORKSHOP RECOVER Edmonton s Urban Wellness Plan Mapping Workshop December 4, 2017

PROGRAM EVALUATION: COMPUTER AND ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY. OIR Report No

Mansfield Independent School District. Welcome to High School

Who will do the nuclear science at RIA? Training the next generation of nuclear scientists for DOE

Admission Content Preparation Review Worksheet - Chemistry Teacher Preparation Program

NSHE DIVERSITY REPORT

Cover/Signature Page - Abbreviated Template/Abbreviated Template with Curriculum

PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS Degree: Bachelor of Science Major: Chemistry

El Camino College/ Compton Center. Dr. Jane Harmon, Dean. Geology Department. Program Review. Spring Prepared by Leonard Clark

Geospatial Services in Special Libraries: A Needs Assessment Perspective

COMMISSION ON ACCREDITATION 2011 ANNUAL REPORT ONLINE

An extended summary of the NCGR/Berkeley Double-Blind Test of Astrology undertaken by Shawn Carlson and published in 1985

Marketing Research Session 10 Hypothesis Testing with Simple Random samples (Chapter 12)

Proposal for a new Minor in Geophysics

College contact: Karen Carney, Associate Dean, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences,

P E O P L E A N A LY T I C S 4. 0

Fifth Grade Social Studies Major Instructional Goals

Cato Elementary School School Report Card Jacksonville Cato Road North Little Rock, AR

Landmark Elementary School School Report Card Arch Street Pike Little Rock, AR

College Station Elem. School School Report Card Frasier Pike, PO Bx 670 College Station, AR

Bachelor of Science in Geology

What we don t know, we teach one another. Robert Oppenheimer, describing the profession of theoretical physics, in 1946

Change the narrative for Chemistry, and change the major and minor requirements for Chemistry

LEHMAN COLLEGE OF THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF CHEMISTRY CURRICULUM CHANGE

PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS Degree: Bachelor of Science Major: Chemistry Concentration: Biochemistry

Northern Secondary School Grade 11 Chemistry (SCH3U) Evaluation Policy

What factors promote interest in geology? Results from surveys of GSA members

Letting reality speak. How the Chicago School Sociology teaches scholars to speak with our findings.

CHEMISTRY, BS. Degree Requirements. Admissions. Policies. Requirements. Admissions & Policies. Teacher Licensure. BS without Concentration

Using Geographic Data in Higher Education Advocacy. CAIR Conference 2018 Anaheim, CA

COMMISSION ON ACCREDITATION 2014 ANNUAL REPORT ONLINE

The Application and Promise of Hierarchical Linear Modeling (HLM) in Studying First-Year Student Programs

Internet Resource Guide. For Chemical Engineering Students at The Pennsylvania State University

Chapter 26: Comparing Counts (Chi Square)

Purpose Study conducted to determine the needs of the health care workforce related to GIS use, incorporation and training.

Methods of Mathematics

Geography (GEOG) Courses

Tulare County Office of Education BTSA Induction Consortium

Transforming Chemistry Education through the Green Chemistry Commitment. Amy S. Cannon, Ph.D. Executive Director Beyond Benign

Mission Statement. Program outcomes

Upper-Level Physics: Ken Krane Oregon State University. New Faculty Workshop June 18, 2013

Geologic Time Scale and Crookston Geologic History

Geological Foundations of Environmental Sciences

Dental Hygiene. Program Director: Deborah Carl Wolf, RDH, MEd Student Undergraduate Enrollment by First Degree: First Major - Fall Semester

Enrollment of Students with Disabilities

The complete lesson plan for this topic is included below.

Dana Wright, Director of Academic Program Development

ECONOMETRIC MODEL WITH QUALITATIVE VARIABLES

Inclement Weather FAQ s

PRACTICES AND CHALLENGES OF IMPLEMENTING LOCALLY AVAILABLE EQUIPMENT FOR TEACHING CHEMISTRY IN PRIMARY SCHOOLS OF NORTH SHEWA ZONE IN AMHARA REGION

JOB DESCRIPTION. Research Associate - Urban Economy and Employment

B R I D G I N G T H E D I V E R S I T Y G A P

Course Outline. School Name: Keewaytinook Internet High School. Department Name: Canadian and World Studies. Ministry of Education Course Title:

Degree Type Bachelor of Science (BS) Degree Title Biology

LEHMAN COLLEGE OF THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK. 1. Type of Change: Change in Degree Requirements

PHYSICS MAJOR, B.S. Student Learning Outcomes. Contact Information. Requirements. Department Programs. Physics Major, B.S.

COMMISSION ON ACCREDITATION 2012 ANNUAL REPORT ONLINE

department of chemistry

Career and College Readiness in Terms of Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS)

CHEMISTRY, BS. Admissions. Policies. Degree Requirements. Admissions & Policies. Requirements. BS without Concentration.

Chapter 18. Sampling Distribution Models. Copyright 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc.

Behavioral Goals and Objectives

HOW TO IMPROVE LINKS BETWEEN SCHOOL GEOGRAPHY DEPARTMENTS AND LOCAL UNIVERSITY GEOGRAPHY and EDUCATION DEPARTMENTS

Understanding The Law of Attraction

Council Workshop on Neighbourhoods Thursday, October 4 th, :00 to 4:00 p.m. Burlington Performing Arts Centre

Environmental Systems (b) Introduction.

Faculty Evaluation of Dr. Patricia Cukor Avila, Director Linguistics Program, College of Information

A Bachelor of Science in Mathematics that Emphasizes Mathematical Meanings for Teaching Mathematics

ADVISING INFORMATION DEPARTMENT OF CHEMISTRY UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAMS

On the learning of algebra

BECOME A CERTIFIED SPIRIT GUIDE COACH. Hay House Live Online Event DEBORAH KING. With. HANDBOOK

Report for the Masters of Counseling at Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary Hamilton

These are my slides and notes introducing the Red Queen Game to the National Association of Biology Teachers meeting in Denver in 2016.

Creating a Staff Development Plan with Esri

Temporary College Closure Due to Inclement Weather or Other Adverse Conditions.

Student Questionnaire (s) Main Survey

GEOGRAPHY MA, ASSESSMENT REPORT AY

Curriculum: The Impact of MCAT 2015

Request for the use of the Doppler on Wheels (DOW) NSF Facility for Education DOW Observations of Lake-Effects

Alternative Growth Goals for Students Attending Alternative Education Campuses

What Is It Like Outside?

ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING Department of Geology University of Puerto Rico at Mayaguez. Progress Report

Transcription:

Advising and Advice at Cal: What do Undergraduates Tell Us? G R E G G T H O M S O N, C Y N D Y S N Y D E R, & S E R E E TA A L E X A N D E R A S S I S T E D B Y A LY X F L O U R N O Y A N D P E D R O S P I VA K O V S K Y - G O N Z A L E Z O F F I C E O F S T U D E N T R E S E A R C H A N D C A M P U S S U R V E Y S O F F I C E O F P L A N N I N G A N D A N A LY S I S U N I V E R S I T Y O F C A L I F O R N I A, B E R K E L E Y Stay Day Conference University of California, Berkeley June 18, 2010

Background: The Importance of Advising Advising is a crucial component of a student s experience in higher education (Gordon & Habley, 2000; Habley, 2004). Historically, academic advising has taken two approaches: the prescriptive and the developmental (Crookston, 1972). Developmental approaches have become the prevalent approach to advising in post-secondary institutions. Quality academic advising involves helping students integrate the various curricular and cocurricular aspects of their education into a meaningful whole, referring them to campus resources, providing information about degree requirements and how things work at the university, and providing them with opportunities to develop planning, problem solving, and decision making capabilities in a context of shared responsibility (Smith and Allen, 2006). Student satisfaction with academic advising is an important part of a successful college experience; student satisfaction with academic advising is related to overall student satisfaction and retention (Light, 2001; Corts, et al., 2000).

Background: Studying Advising Assessing student satisfaction allows institutions to gauge how effectively they deliver what students expect, need, and want as well as providing information on how institutions can improve their services. Almost all of the data on students satisfaction with advising has been gathered via closedended survey questions which ask students to rate their satisfaction with certain aspects of advising. Rarely do institutions ask students to tell their stories in their own words about advising; there is a need to hear directly from students about their experiences with advising. There has also been little or no research on the relationship of formal advising to the broader construct of advice that students receive from disparate sources.

The Present Study Today s presentation is part of a larger study that attempts to: Better illuminate Cal students experience with advising by using both traditional quantitative data and new forms of qualitative data Examine interrelationships among qualitative and quantitative findings Use student data and research findings as a catalyst to engage Cal staff and faculty in further inquiry and reflection about the undergraduate experience Provide support for the ongoing efforts to make possible an outstanding undergraduate experience for all our students

Research Questions 1. In students own words, how adequately do advising services meet their needs? 2. What are the sources of perceived best and worst advice, and what is the nature of that advice? 3. What is the advice that current students would give to new students? 4. What types of contradictory advice do students report receiving from administrative offices and staff?

Methods About the UCUES Census survey Survey structure: One core module and four special topics modules Overall response rate of 50% (N = 11,832) The Dataset UCUES 2008 Wild Card Module on Advice and Advising (2000+ Responses) Survey questions regarding: Satisfaction with advising Adequacy of advising Best or worst advice received Advice current students would give incoming students Conflicting advice received

Methods (Cont d) Analysis Qualitative coding Getting to know the data Rubric development, use, and refinement (iterative process) Reliability checks Quantitative chi square and regression analysis

Demographics 2413 UCUES Wild Card respondents 57% Female 78% admitted as new freshman; 22% transfer students 30% declared major in STEM field, 34% declared in non-stem field, 36% undeclared Average GPA 3.12 27% First generation college student 44% Asian/Filipin@/Pacific Islander; 31% White; 10% Chican@/Latin@; 3% African American/Black; < 0.5% Native American; 3% International; 9% decline to state/unknown/other

Organization of the Presentation Focus on qualitative analysis of undergraduate student responses to four openended questions about advising and advice at UC Berkeley Satisfaction and Adequacy of Advising Best and Worst Advice Received Advice current students would give incoming students Conflicting advice

Findings: Satisfaction Ratings Conventional Survey Questions: How satisfied are you with each of the following aspects of your educational experience? Advising by faculty on academic issues Advising by student peer advisors Advising by school or college staff on academic matters Advising by departmental staff on academic matters Faculty Peer College Dept Very Satisfied 10% 5% 9% 13% Somewhat Satisfied & Satisfied 67% 71% 67% 67% Somewhat to Very Dissatisfied 23% 24% 24% 20%

Findings: Adequacy of Advising Services Survey Question: Consider for a moment the advising, counseling and mentoring resources that have been available to you. Regardless of whether you have used them, to what extent have they met your needs as a Cal undergraduate? Adequacy results: 25% More than Adequate; 55% Adequate; 20% Less than Adequate No overall relationship between UC GPA and adequacy of advising First generation college students, transfer students, and Chicano/Latino students more likely to report advising was more than adequate

Quotes About Adequacy of Advising M y m a j o r a d v i s e r i s a w e s o m e. [ S h e ] d o e s e v e r y t h i n g s h e c a n t o g i v e p e r s o n a l t i m e t o a n y s t u d e n t t h a t n e e d s i t. a n d w h e n y o u a r e i n h e r o f f i c e y o u d o n t f e e l r u s h e d s h e w i l l s i t a n d t a l k t o y o u e v e n t h o u g h s h e m i g h t h a v e a l i n e o u t t h e d o o r. ( M, W h i t e, J u n i o r, I n t e g r a t i v e B i o l o g y ) I f e e l a t t i m e s I w a s t r e a t e d l i k e a S I D n u m b e r r a t h e r t h a n a n a c t u a l s t u d e n t. I f e l t t h a t a t t i m e s t h e r e w a s n o r e a l p e r s o n a l r e g a r d f o r m e a s a s t u d e n t, b u t i n s t e a d I f e l t r u s h e d t o g e t t h r o u g h c o l l e g e a n d a l m o s t p u s h e d o u t t h e d o o r. ( M, C h i c a n o / L a t i n o, J u n i o r, M e c h a n i c a l E n g r )

Findings: Best and Worst Advice Received 76% reported best advice; 24% reported worst advice Level of parental education has a significant impact on source of best advice Parent (s) w/ No College Parent (s) w/ Graduate Degree Cal Undergrad 38% 46% Parent/Guardian 6% 17% UCB Staff/Faculty 35% 21%

Findings: Source of Best and Worst Advice Source Best Worst Overall Another Cal undergrad 43% 31% 40% Cal Staff Advisor 9% 29% 14% Cal Faculty Member 11% 14% 12% Your parent/guardian 11% 3% 9% Other Source 8% 9% 8% Cal Graduate Student 5% 3% 4% Friend not enrolled at Cal 4% 3% 4% Another relative of yours 4% 2% 4% Other Cal Staff member 2% 4% 3% Website/Publication 1% 3% 2% Total N 1595 494 2089

Findings: Best and Worst Advice Themes CATEGORIES OF BEST/WORST ADVICE RECEIVED After responding to the initial closed-ended item so as to indicate the valence of the advice or advising experience, students then provided an open-ended response. Responses were coded individually Top 5 Best Advice Themes 1. Effort and persistence needed to succeed (20%) 2. Exploring options and enjoying one s time at Cal (12%) 3. Get involved (6%) 4. Classes (6%) Top 5 Worst Advice Themes 1. Classes (24%) 2. Choosing majors (11%) 3. Exploring options and enjoying one s time at Cal (10%) 4. Effort and persistence needed to succeed (6%) 5. Pursue interest (5%) 5. Course load (5%)

Quotes from Best Advice A l w a y s g o t o c l a s s. Yo u n e v e r k n o w w h a t s g o i n g t o b e p a s s e d o u t, o r m e n t i o n e d. I t m e a n s t h a t y o u w i l l a l w a y s, a t l e a s t, p a s s y o u r c l a s s e s. ( M, C h i c a n o / L a t i n o, S o p h, P s y c h o l o g y ) ( A n o t h e r C a l u n d e r g r a d u a t e ) Yo u r e h e r e n o t t o g e t a d e g r e e b u t t o g e t y o u r l i f e. T h i s h e l p e d m e k e e p t h e b i g p i c t u r e i n m i n d --n o t t o s w e a t t h e s m a l l s t u f f a n d t o k e e p i n m i n d t h e t h i n g s t h a t a r e t r u l y i m p o r t a n t. ( F, A s i a n / F i l i p i n a / P a c i f i c I s l a n d e r, S e n i o r, P u b l i c H e a l t h ) ( A n o t h e r C a l u n d e r g r a d u a t e )

Quotes from Worst Advice D o n t p a s s o u t o f A P s b e c a u s e C a l s c l a s s e s a r e m u c h m o r e d i f f i c u l t. I d i d n t p a s s o u t o f P h y s i c s 7 A b e c a u s e o f t h i s b u t I m f i n d i n g t h a t I k n o w e v e r y t h i n g t h a t i s b e i n g t a u g h t. ( M, A s i a n / F i l i p i n o / P a c i f i c I s l a n d e r, S o p h, M e c h a n i c a l E n g r ) ( A n o t h e r C a l u n d e r g r a d u a t e ) I t h i n k m y m a j o r a d v i s o r i s c r a zy. S h e a l w a y s t e l l s m e w r o n g t h i n g s. W i t h i n o n e h o u r, s h e a s k e d m e t o c h a n g e m y m a j o r, t o n o t c h a n g e i t, a n d t o d o u b l e m a j o r. ( F, A s i a n / F i l i p i n a / P a c i f i c I s l a n d e r, J u n i o r, U n d e c l a r e d ) ( A C a l s t a f f a d v i s o r )

Findings: Advice From Students to Students CATEGORIES OF ADVICE STUDENTS WOULD GIVE Survey Question: Based on your experience, if YOU were to give one piece of helpful advice to an incoming freshman or transfer student about to start at Cal, what would you say? Demographic correlates of advice students would give Students with less years at Cal: Effort, persistence, keep up ; students with more years at Cal: Explore and have fun Lower GPA students: Effort, persistence, keep up ; Higher GPA students: Explore and have fun Best Advice Received 1. Effort and persistence needed to succeed (20%) 2. Exploring options and enjoying one s time at Cal (12%), Advice Would Give 1. Explore (13%) 2. Effort (12%) 3. Get involved (6%) 3. Get involved (8%) 4. Classes (6%) 4. Collaborate (5%) 5. Pursue interest (5%) 5. Major (5%)

Quotes from Students to Students S o c i a l i ze, s t u d y a b r o a d, d o n o t t a k e m u c h m o r e a b o v e t h e r e c o m m e n d e d a m o u n t o f u n i t s, c h o o s e a m a j o r e a r l y a n d t r y t o c h o o s e b r e a d t h r e q u i r e m e n t s t h a t f u l f i l l m a j o r e l e c t i v e s, a n d r e m e m b e r t o e n j o y y o u r t i m e a t B e r k e l e y w h i l e y o u s t i l l c a n! ( M, W h i t e, J u n i o r, M a r i n e S c i e n c e ) M a k e f r i e n d s s o t h a t y o u c a n s u p p o r t e a c h o t h e r, p a r t i c u l a r l y i n y o u r m a j o r. K e e p u p w i t h y o u r a s s i g n m e n t s a n d m a k e s u r e y o u g e t e n o u g h s l e e p. D o n t f o r g e t t o h a v e f u n, t o o. ( M, W h i t e, S e n i o r, F i l m )

Findings: Conflicting Advice Survey Question: Have you ever received advice from two different offices or staff members at Cal that was contradictory or in conflict? Please explain what happened. 17% reported receiving conflicting advice Open ended responses were coded Major Themes of Conflicting Advice: Fulfilling and completing requirements (23%) Declaring a major/double majoring (11%) Classes (10%) General advice (9%)

Findings: Conflicting Advice Female students were more likely to report having received conflicting advice than male students (18% versus 14%). Asian students less likely to indicate that they received conflicting advice; Chicano/Latino students more likely Students with more years at Cal (3 years & beyond for both freshman and transfer admits) more likely to indicate that they received conflicting advice. No difference as a function of STEM major or admit status Receipt of conflicting advice was related to overall satisfaction with advising such that those who reported lower satisfaction with advising from peer, faculty, college, or departmental level advisors were more likely to report that they had received conflicting advice

Quotes About Conflicting Advice I t w a s m y f i r s t s e m e s t e r a f t e r t r a n s f e r r i n g t o C a l. B e c a u s e B e a r f a c t s h a s n t u p l o a d e d a l l m y a c a d e m i c r e c o r d s y e t, s o I w e n t t o t h e L & S o f f i c e t o a s k q u e s t i o n s r e g a r d i n g s o m e c o u r s e r e q u i r e m e n t s. T h e p e r s o n a t t h e f r o n t d e s k t o l d m e t h a t I s t i l l n e e d e d t o f u l f i l l m y A C r e q u i r e m e n t, s o I c h o s e a c o u r s e t h a t w o u l d f u l f i l l i t. A c o u p l e m o n t h s l a t e r, I f i g u r e d f r o m b e a r f a c t s t h a t m y A C r e q u i r e m e n t h a s a l r e a d y b e e n f u l f i l l e d b y m y p r e v i o u s c o u r s e w o r k, b u t i t w a s a l r e a d y t o o l a t e t o d r o p t h e c l a s s. ( F, U n k n o w n, J u n i o r, S o c i o l o g y ) O n e a d v i s o r t o l d m e n o t t o d o u b l e m a j o r b e c a u s e i t w o u l d b e t o o d i f f i c u l t ; A n o t h e r t o l d m e I c o u l d d o i t e a s i l y. I d e c i d e d n o t t o d o u b l e m a j o r, n o t b e c a u s e i t w o u l d b e t o o h a r d, b u t b e c a u s e I f o u n d d i f f e r e n t i n t e r e s t s. (F, Chican@/Latin@, Frosh, Undeclared)

Quotes About Conflicting Advice W h e n p l a n n i n g f o r t h e S p r i n g s e m e s t e r, I a s k e d a b o u t t a k i n g a l a n g u a g e c l a s s o f a n L & S a d v i s e r w h e n I w a s t r y i n g t o p l a n f o r m y s c h e d u l e a n d t h e l e v e l I n e e d e d w a s o n l y o f f e r e d d u r i n g F a l l, w h i c h I o n l y f o u n d o u t w h e n t a l k i n g t o a d e p a r t m e n t a d v i s e r. T h e L S a d v i s e r i n s i s t e d t h a t i t w a s o f f e r e d d u r i n g S p r i n g a n d t h i s w a s j u s t e x t r e m e l y f r u s t r a t i n g. ( F, A s i a n / F i l i p i n @ / P a c i f i c I s l a n d e r, S o p h o m o r e, U n d e c l a r e d ) D e p a r t m e n t a n d C o l l e g e a d v i c e o f t e n c l a s h e s. I n m y e x p e r i e n c e, m y d e p a r t m e n t w a s o v e r w h e l m i n g l y h e l p f u l a n d i n t e r e s t e d i n c a t e r i n g t o m y n e e d s / c i r c u m s t a n c e s. T h e c o l l e g e w a s n o t ; r a t h e r, t h e y e x p e c t e d e v e r y s t u d e n t t o f o l l o w s t r i c t g u i d e l i n e s i n w h a t f e l t l i k e a n a t t e m p t t o p r o d u c e c o o k i e - c u t t e r a c a d e m i a n s. ( M, N a t i v e A m e r i c a n, S e n i o r, S o c i a l S c i e n c e )

What Have We Learned? Satisfaction with advising and assessment of its adequacy Sources of best and worst advice Inadequate, worst, and conflicting advice -- a common theme? Best advice received and advice students would give: Effort and Persistence versus Explore and Enjoy

Example: Don t AP Out A number of the most vehement worst advice testimonials said that this was bad advice; the student perspective Source and rationale for the advice Multiple perspectives and stakeholders Is it really bad advice? How do we know?

Revisiting the Prescriptive and Developmental Models of Advising Prescriptive Developmental Old New Academic advising: requirements, declaring a major, how to approach one s studies Tighten up - Instrumental advice on what a student needs to do to achieve academic success at Cal Partnership in making life choices, focus on whole person, advising as counseling, etc. Loosen up - Advice on (the need for) the non-academic realm especially given the Cal environment

Four Types of Advice/Advising Global Specific Academic Success Broader strategies to avoid failure and ensure academic survival and success Rules and requirements, tips for academic success, what to choose and pitfalls to avoid Self-Development Overall orientation to college, strategies for selfsurvival and development in intense academic environment Tips for personal success, fulfillment, navigating college (including housing, finances)

Advising and Diversity at Cal: Special Challenges Our previous research on undergraduate diversity at Cal based on UCUES and institutional data demonstrates differences in the relative balance of academic success versus developmental orientation to undergraduate life at Cal associated in particular with immigrant generation and family educational background. What are the implications of this for advising at Cal and the tighten up versus loosen up kinds of advising that might be offered? Specifically, for example, is it helpful to encourage all of our more tightly wound (seemingly academically intense or pressured) students to loosen up? Or not? To what extent do differences in student background require differences in the advice given? How do we know?

Questions? Comments? What was the most interesting/surprising thing you heard today? What did you not hear that you expected to hear? Does anything you heard today have implications for your work with students? Where should we go from here to further our understanding of the student experience of advising and advice?

References Corts, D.P., Lounsbury, J.W., Saudargas, J.W., Tatum, R.A., & Holly, E. (2000). Assessing undergraduate satisfaction with an academic department: A method and case study. College Student Journal, 34(3), 399-408. Crookston, B. B. (1972). A developmental view of academic advising as teaching. Journal of College Student Personnel, 13(1), 12-17. Gordon, V. N., Habley W. R., & Associates (Eds.) (2000). Academic Advising: A comprehensive handbook. San Francisco: Jossey Bass. Habley, W. R. (Ed.). (2004). The Status of Academic Advising: Findings from the ACT Sixth National Survey. National Academic Advising Association Monograph Series No.10. Manhattan, Kans.: NACADA. Light. R.J. (2001). Making the most of college: Students speak their minds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Smith, C. L., & Allen, J. M. (2006). Essential functions of academic advising: What students want and get. NACADA Journal, 26, 56-66.