Eigenvalue localization for complex matrices

Similar documents
Improving the Localization of Eigenvalues for Complex Matrices

Disjoint unions of complete graphs characterized by their Laplacian spectrum

A new error bound for linear complementarity problems for B-matrices

TRACES OF HADAMARD AND KRONECKER PRODUCTS OF MATRICES. 1. Introduction

Bounds for the Extreme Eigenvalues Using the Trace and Determinant

Generalization of Samuelson s inequality and location of eigenvalues

c 2006 Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics

PAijpam.eu ON TENSOR PRODUCT DECOMPOSITION

ON SOME DIOPHANTINE EQUATIONS RELATED TO SQUARE TRIANGULAR AND BALANCING NUMBERS

SOME RELATIONS ON HERMITE MATRIX POLYNOMIALS. Levent Kargin and Veli Kurt

Yuki Seo. Received May 23, 2010; revised August 15, 2010

The path polynomial of a complete graph

On Nonsingularity of Saddle Point Matrices. with Vectors of Ones

A Hadamard-type lower bound for symmetric diagonally dominant positive matrices

On Energy and Laplacian Energy of Graphs

On n-collinear elements and Riesz theorem

International Journal of Mathematical Archive-3(4), 2012, Page: Available online through ISSN

Linear combinations of graph eigenvalues

The inverse eigenvalue problem for symmetric doubly stochastic matrices

arxiv: v1 [math.fa] 3 Apr 2016

Tauberian theorems for the product of Borel and Hölder summability methods

ON POINTWISE BINOMIAL APPROXIMATION

Some Common Fixed Point Theorems in Cone Rectangular Metric Space under T Kannan and T Reich Contractive Conditions

On Summability Factors for N, p n k

Matrix representations of Fibonacci-like sequences

A collocation method for singular integral equations with cosecant kernel via Semi-trigonometric interpolation

New Inequalities For Convex Sequences With Applications

SHARP INEQUALITIES INVOLVING THE CONSTANT e AND THE SEQUENCE (1 + 1/n) n

Local Approximation Properties for certain King type Operators

Self-normalized deviation inequalities with application to t-statistic

COMMON FIXED POINT THEOREMS VIA w-distance

Laplacian energy of a graph

Sh. Al-sharif - R. Khalil

On Orlicz N-frames. 1 Introduction. Renu Chugh 1,, Shashank Goel 2

Applied Mathematics Letters. On the properties of Lucas numbers with binomial coefficients

γ-max Labelings of Graphs

Singular value decomposition. Mathématiques appliquées (MATH0504-1) B. Dewals, Ch. Geuzaine

Probabilistic and Average Linear Widths in L -Norm with Respect to r-fold Wiener Measure

On the Jacobsthal-Lucas Numbers by Matrix Method 1

Inclusion Properties of Orlicz and Weak Orlicz Spaces

Miskolc Mathematical Notes HU e-issn Bounds for Laplacian-type graph energies. Ivan Gutman, Emina Milovanovic, and Igor Milovanovic

Approximation by Superpositions of a Sigmoidal Function

SOME TRIBONACCI IDENTITIES

The value of Banach limits on a certain sequence of all rational numbers in the interval (0,1) Bao Qi Feng

Some Trigonometric Identities Involving Fibonacci and Lucas Numbers

MORE GRAPHS WHOSE ENERGY EXCEEDS THE NUMBER OF VERTICES

An operator equality involving a continuous field of operators and its norm inequalities

CHAPTER I: Vector Spaces

page Suppose that S 0, 1 1, 2.

THE ASYMPTOTIC COMPLEXITY OF MATRIX REDUCTION OVER FINITE FIELDS

AN INTRODUCTION TO SPECTRAL GRAPH THEORY

New Bounds for the Resolvent Energy of Graphs

arxiv: v1 [math.pr] 4 Dec 2013

Matrix Theory, Math6304 Lecture Notes from November 27, 2012 taken by Charles Mills

The Perturbation Bound for the Perron Vector of a Transition Probability Tensor

Several properties of new ellipsoids

Fastest mixing Markov chain on a path

Number of Spanning Trees of Circulant Graphs C 6n and their Applications

Bijective Proofs of Gould s and Rothe s Identities

Math 104: Homework 2 solutions

Iterative method for computing a Schur form of symplectic matrix

A remark on p-summing norms of operators

Strong Convergence Theorems According. to a New Iterative Scheme with Errors for. Mapping Nonself I-Asymptotically. Quasi-Nonexpansive Types

The random version of Dvoretzky s theorem in l n

SPECTRUM OF THE DIRECT SUM OF OPERATORS

The log-behavior of n p(n) and n p(n)/n

Notes for Lecture 11

A note on the p-adic gamma function and q-changhee polynomials

HÖLDER SUMMABILITY METHOD OF FUZZY NUMBERS AND A TAUBERIAN THEOREM

A 2nTH ORDER LINEAR DIFFERENCE EQUATION

Some Tauberian Conditions for the Weighted Mean Method of Summability

Miskolc Mathematical Notes HU e-issn Uniform approximation by means of some piecewise linear functions. Zoltán Finta

A Note On The Exponential Of A Matrix Whose Elements Are All 1

An almost sure invariance principle for trimmed sums of random vectors

Lecture 3: August 31

Some Results on Certain Symmetric Circulant Matrices

Common Coupled Fixed Point of Mappings Satisfying Rational Inequalities in Ordered Complex Valued Generalized Metric Spaces

ON BLEIMANN, BUTZER AND HAHN TYPE GENERALIZATION OF BALÁZS OPERATORS

A note on the Frobenius conditional number with positive definite matrices

ROTATION-EQUIVALENCE CLASSES OF BINARY VECTORS. 1. Introduction

Commutativity in Permutation Groups

An iterative method to solve a nonlinear matrix equation

ON MEAN ERGODIC CONVERGENCE IN THE CALKIN ALGEBRAS

Riesz-Fischer Sequences and Lower Frame Bounds

A GENERALIZATION OF THE SYMMETRY BETWEEN COMPLETE AND ELEMENTARY SYMMETRIC FUNCTIONS. Mircea Merca

A Study on Some Integer Sequences

On the Determinants and Inverses of Skew Circulant and Skew Left Circulant Matrices with Fibonacci and Lucas Numbers

An analog of the arithmetic triangle obtained by replacing the products by the least common multiples

An Introduction to Randomized Algorithms

MAJORIZATION PROBLEMS FOR SUBCLASSES OF ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS INVOLVING

Concavity Solutions of Second-Order Differential Equations

Hoggatt and King [lo] defined a complete sequence of natural numbers

SOME SEQUENCE SPACES DEFINED BY ORLICZ FUNCTIONS

Estimates of (1 + x) 1/x Involved in Carleman s Inequality and Keller s Limit

A New Bound between Higher Order Nonlinearity and Algebraic Immunity

ON SOME INEQUALITIES IN NORMED LINEAR SPACES

Properties of Fuzzy Length on Fuzzy Set

The normal subgroup structure of ZM-groups

ON THE LEHMER CONSTANT OF FINITE CYCLIC GROUPS

The Matrix Analog of the Kneser-Süss Inequality

Transcription:

Electroic Joural of Liear Algebra Volume 7 Article 1070 014 Eigevalue localizatio for complex matrices Ibrahim Halil Gumus Adıyama Uiversity, igumus@adiyama.edu.tr Omar Hirzallah Hashemite Uiversity, o.hirzal@hu.edu.jo Fuad Kittaeh Jorda Uiversity, fkitt@ju.edu.jo Follow this ad additioal works at: http://repository.uwyo.edu/ela Recommeded Citatio Gumus, Ibrahim Halil; Hirzallah, Omar; ad Kittaeh, Fuad. (014), "Eigevalue localizatio for complex matrices", Electroic Joural of Liear Algebra, Volume 7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13001/1081-3810.866 This Article is brought to you for free ad ope access by Wyomig Scholars Repository. It has bee accepted for iclusio i Electroic Joural of Liear Algebra by a authorized editor of Wyomig Scholars Repository. For more iformatio, please cotact scholcom@uwyo.edu.

Electroic Joural of Liear Algebra ISSN 1081-3810 A publicatio of the Iteratioal Liear Algebra Society Volume 7, pp. 89-906, December 014 http://math.techio.ac.il/iic/ela EIGENVALUE LOCALIZATION FOR COMPLEX MATRICES IBRAHIM HALIL GÜMÜŞ, OMAR HIRZALLAH, AND FUAD KITTANEH Abstract. Let A be a complex matrix with 3. It is show that at least of the eigevalues of A lie i the disk z tra 1 A tra A A AA spd (A), where A,trA, ad spd(a)deote the Frobeiusorm, the trace, ad the spreadofa, respectively. I particular, if A = [a ij ] is ormal, the at least of the eigevalues of A lie i the disk z tra 1 A tra 3 max i,,..., a ki + a kj + k=1 k i k=1 k j aii ajj. Moreover, the costat 3 ca be replaced by 4 if the matrix A is Hermitia. Key words. Eigevalue, Localizatio, Frobeius orm, Trace, Spread, Normal matrix. AMS subject classificatios. 15A18, 15A4. 1. Itroductio. Let M (C) be the set of all complex matrices. For a matrixa M (C), let λ j (A), j = 1,...,, be the eigevaluesofarepeated accordig to multiplicity, ad let the symbols A ad tra deote the Frobeius orm ad the trace of A, respectively. We have to keep i mid that the Frobeius orm is uitarily ivariat, that is, UAV = A for all uitary matrices U,V i M (C) ad tra = λ j (A). A estimate for the eigevalues of matrices [14] says that if A is a real Received by the editors o March 14, 014. Accepted for publicatio o December 6, 014. Hadlig Editor: Brya L. Shader. Departmet of Mathematics, Faculty of Arts ad Scieces, Adıyama Uiversity, Adıyama, Turkey (igumus@adiyama.edu.tr). Departmet of Mathematics, Hashemite Uiversity, Zarqa, Jorda (o.hirzal@hu.edu.jo). Departmet of Mathematics, The Uiversity of Jorda, Amma, Jorda (fkitt@ju.edu.jo). 89

Electroic Joural of Liear Algebra ISSN 1081-3810 A publicatio of the Iteratioal Liear Algebra Society Volume 7, pp. 89-906, December 014 http://math.techio.ac.il/iic/ela symmetric matrix, the Eigevalue Localizatio 893 1 A tra. (1.1) for l = 1,...,. Moreover, a geeralizatio of (1.1) for arbitrary matrices A M (C) has bee obtaied i [11]. Oe of the iterestig estimates that presets a refiemet of (1.1) for oormal matrices has bee established i [1]. This refiemet asserts that if A M (C), the ( 1 A A A AA 6 A for l = 1,...,. A improvemet of the boud for λ l (A) tra bee established i [13], which asserts that if A M (C), the ) tra 1 4 A tra A A AA for l = 1,...,. (1.) give i (1.) has (1.3) I this paper, we obtai bouds ad localizatio results for the eigevalues of matrices. Our results, which ivolve the traces ad the spreads of matrices, are better tha some kow bouds ad localizatio results. I particular, refiemets of (1.) ad (1.3) will be give.. Eigevalue localizatio for oormal matrices. I this sectio, we preset refiemets of (1.) ad (1.3) for oormal matrices. Throughout the paper, we let the symbol S l deote the set {1,...,}\{l} for l = 1,...,. We start with the followig result for scalars. Lemma.1. Let z 1,...,z be complex umbers such that for l = 1,...,. z l + 1 z j z k = 1 z j = 0. The z j

Electroic Joural of Liear Algebra ISSN 1081-3810 A publicatio of the Iteratioal Liear Algebra Society Volume 7, pp. 89-906, December 014 http://math.techio.ac.il/iic/ela 894 I.H. Gumus, O. Hirzallah, ad F. Kittaeh Proof. Let l {1,...,}. The z l + 1 z j z k = z j + 1 z j z k j S l = z j + 1 z j z k j S l = j j + 1 z j z k j Slz j Slz = z j + 1 ( z j z k + z k z j )+ 1 j S l z j z k = j S l z j + 1 = j S l z j + 1 = ( 1) j S l z j = ( 1) j k j k j k j k ( z j z k + z k z j + z j z k ) ( z j + z k ) z j ( 1) z l. (.1) It follows from the idetity (.1) that z l + 1 z j z k = ( 1) z j, ad so as required. z l + 1 z j z k = 1 z j, Aother result for scalars that we eed is the followig. Its proof is similar to that of Lemma.1 ad is left to the reader. Lemma.. Let z 1,...,z be complex umbers. The z j = 1 z j + 1 z j z k. 1 j<k

Electroic Joural of Liear Algebra ISSN 1081-3810 A publicatio of the Iteratioal Liear Algebra Society Volume 7, pp. 89-906, December 014 http://math.techio.ac.il/iic/ela Eigevalue Localizatio 895 Our first result is the followig idetity. Theorem.3. Let A M (C) with 3. The + 1 λ j (A) λ k (A) = 1 λ j (A) tra for l = 1,...,. Proof. Let z j = λ j (A) tra, j = 1,...,. The = z l + 1 = 1 = 1 = 1 = 1 = 1 = 1 + 1 λ j (A) λ k (A) z j z k z j (by Lemma.1) z j = 0, ad so 1 z j + 1 z j z k (by Lemma.) 1 j<k 1 z j z k 1 j<k 1 λ j (A) λ k (A) 1 j<k λ j (A) 1 λ j (A) (by Lemma.) λ j (A) tra for l = 1,...,. Also, we eed the followig boud for the eigevalues of a give matrix A M (C) [4].

Electroic Joural of Liear Algebra ISSN 1081-3810 A publicatio of the Iteratioal Liear Algebra Society Volume 7, pp. 89-906, December 014 http://math.techio.ac.il/iic/ela 896 I.H. Gumus, O. Hirzallah, ad F. Kittaeh Lemma.4. Let A M (C). The λ j (A) A tra A A AA + tra. Remark.5. The boud give i Lemma.4 is sharper tha the bouds: λ j (A) A A A AA 6 A ad λ j (A) A 4 A A AA give earlier i [] ad [7], respectively. These bouds, i tur, are sharper tha the classical Schur s iequality [15, p. 50]. Based o Theorem.3 ad Lemma.4, we have the followig localizatio result for the eigevalues of matrices. This result icludes a refiemet of (1.3). Theorem.6. Let A M (C) with 3. The 1 ( for l = 1,...,. I particular, + 1 A tra λ j (A) λ k (A) ) A A AA 1 4 A tra A A AA (.) (.3) for l = 1,...,. Proof. The result follows from Theorem.3 ad Lemma.4. We remark here that (.3) has bee obtaied earlier i [13]. Applicatios of Theorem.6 are give i the followig result. This result icludes a refiemet of (1.).

Electroic Joural of Liear Algebra ISSN 1081-3810 A publicatio of the Iteratioal Liear Algebra Society Volume 7, pp. 89-906, December 014 http://math.techio.ac.il/iic/ela Corollary.7. Let A M (C) with 3. The: Eigevalue Localizatio 897 (a) 1 A 4 A A AA tra (.4) (b) for l = 1,...,. ( 1 A A A AA 4 A for l = 1,...,. ) tra (.5) Proof. By direct computatios, it ca be see that A tra A A AA A 4 A A AA tra (.6) ad A 4 A A AA A A A AA 4 A. (.7) Now, part (a) of the corollary follows from (.3) ad (.6), while part (b) follows from (.4) ad (.7). Remark.8. It is clear from (.6) ad (.7) that the boud for λ l (A) tra give i (.3) is sharper tha that give i (.4), which, i tur, is sharper tha that give i (.5). Aother boud for the eigevalues of a give matrix A M (C) says that λ j (A) A A A AA 4 A. This boud ca be iferred from Lemma.4, (.6), ad (.7), ad it ca also be obtaied from Theorem i [3], cocerig measures of oormality of matrices. To give aother applicatio of Theorem.6, we eed the followig lemma [9]. Lemma.9. Let z 1,...,z be complex umbers. The max z j z k z j z k. (.8) j,k=1,..., 1 j<k

Electroic Joural of Liear Algebra ISSN 1081-3810 A publicatio of the Iteratioal Liear Algebra Society Volume 7, pp. 89-906, December 014 http://math.techio.ac.il/iic/ela 898 I.H. Gumus, O. Hirzallah, ad F. Kittaeh Based o Theorem.6 ad Lemma.9, we have the followig result. This result presets aother refiemet of (1.3). Corollary.10. Let A M (C) with 3. The 1 A tra A A AA for l = 1,...,, where s(a) = mi 1 l max λ j (A) λ k (A). Proof. Sice S l cotais 1 umbers, we have λ j (A) λ k (A) = λ j (A) λ k (A) j<k Now, (.9) follows from (.) ad (.10). s (A) ( 1) max λ j (A) λ k (A) (by Lemma.9) (.9) ( 1)s (A). (.10) Remark.11. A localizatio result for the eigevalues of matrices has bee give i [4]. This result asserts that if the eigevalues of a matrix A M (C) are arraged as λ 1 (A) λ (A), the m m 1 A m tra A A AA + tra (tra) m for l = 1,...,m, where m is ay iteger satisfyig raka m. Aother result aalogous to (.) ca be stated as follows. Theorem.1. Let A M (C) with 3. The 1 ( + 1 A tra ( 1) ( tr ( A ) λ l(a) ) (tra λ l (A)) ) A A AA (.11)

Electroic Joural of Liear Algebra ISSN 1081-3810 A publicatio of the Iteratioal Liear Algebra Society Volume 7, pp. 89-906, December 014 http://math.techio.ac.il/iic/ela Eigevalue Localizatio 899 for l = 1,...,. Proof. Observe that λ j (A) λ k (A) = (λ j (A) λ k (A)) (λ j (A) λ k (A)) = λ j (A)+λ ( k (A) λ j(a)λ k (A)) = λ j (A)+ λ k (A) λ j (A)λ k (A) = ( 1) λ j (A) j (A) j S j Slλ l = ( 1) λ j (A) λ l (A) λ k (A) λ l (A) = ( 1) λ j (A ) λ l (A) (tra λ l (A)) = ( 1) ( tr ( A ) λ l (A)) (tra λ l (A)). (.1) Now, the result follows from Theorem.6 ad (.1). The spreadspd(a) ofamatrix A M (C) is defied to be the maximum distace betwee ay two eigevalues of A, that is, spd(a) = max j,k=1,..., λ j(a) λ k (A). I the followig result, we describe a disk that cotais at least of the eigevalues of a give matrix A M (C). A localizatio result for at least of the eigevalues of A M (C) that improves (1.3) ca be cocluded from this result.

Electroic Joural of Liear Algebra ISSN 1081-3810 A publicatio of the Iteratioal Liear Algebra Society Volume 7, pp. 89-906, December 014 http://math.techio.ac.il/iic/ela 900 I.H. Gumus, O. Hirzallah, ad F. Kittaeh Theorem.13. Let A M (C) with 3. The at least of the eigevalues of A lie i the disk z tra 1 A tra A A AA spd (A). (.13) Proof. Let s,t {1,...,} be such that spd(a) = λ s (A) λ t (A) ad let S = {1,...,}\{s,t}. The s,t S l for all l S, ad so for all l S. It follows that λ j (A) λ k (A) = spd(a) = max λ j (A) λ k (A) (.14) j<k λ j (A) λ k (A) ( 1) max λ j (A) λ k (A) (by Lemma.9) = ( 1)spd (A) (by the idetity (.14)) (.15) for all l S. Now, (.15) ad Theorem.6 imply that + 1 spd (A) 1 A tra A A AA, (.16) ad so 1 A tra A A AA spd (A) (.17) for all l S. Sice the set S cotais umbers, the (.17) meas that at least of the eigevalues of A lie i the disk give i (.13). Remark.14. Theorem.13 guaratees that of the eigevalues lie i the disk (.13). The questio that arise here is what about the remaiig two eigevalues.

Electroic Joural of Liear Algebra ISSN 1081-3810 A publicatio of the Iteratioal Liear Algebra Society Volume 7, pp. 89-906, December 014 http://math.techio.ac.il/iic/ela Eigevalue Localizatio 901 I fact, it is clear from the proof of Theorem.13 that the eigevalues of the matrix A M (C) where the spread is attaied do ot ecessarily lie i the disk (.13). Moreover, if oe of these eigevalues is ot simple, the accordig to the proof of Theorem.13, we ca see that this eigevalue must lie i this disk. The followig lemma eables us to give a ew boud for the eigevalues of matrices. The proof of this lemma follows by direct computatios. We leave the details for the iterested reader. Lemma.15. Let A M (C) with 3. The: (a) (b) λj (A) tra = λ j (A) tra. λ j (A) λ k (A) = ( ) l=1 1 j<k λ j (A) λ k (A). Theorem.16. Let A M (C) with 3. The λ j (A) ( 1) A tra A A AA + tra spd (A). Proof. Observe that λ j (A) tra λ j(a) tra = = λ j(a) tra l=1 λ j(a) tra l=1 + + + 1 + 1 spd (A) 1 j<k λ j (A) λ k (A) (by Lemmas.9 ad.15 (a)) λ j (A) λ k (A) l=1 (by Lemma.15 (b)) λ j (A) λ k (A)

Electroic Joural of Liear Algebra ISSN 1081-3810 A publicatio of the Iteratioal Liear Algebra Society Volume 7, pp. 89-906, December 014 http://math.techio.ac.il/iic/ela 90 I.H. Gumus, O. Hirzallah, ad F. Kittaeh l=1 1 ( A tra ) 1 A A AA (by Theorem.6) = ( 1) A tra A A AA. (.18) Now, the result follows from (.18). 3. Eigevalue localizatio for ormal matrices. I this sectio, we are iterested i estimates for at least of the eigevalues of a ormal matrix A M (C). I order to do this, we eed the followig two lemmas of Bhatia ad Sharma [1] ad Mirsky [9]. It should be metioed here that Bhatia ad Sharma did ot write the first lemma below explicitly i this form, but it ca be deduced from their results. Before presetig these lemmas, we eed to defie two fuctioals o M (C) as follows: Let ad dra = i, a ij where A = [a ij ] M (C). v(a) = dra A dra, Lemma 3.1. Let A = [a ij ] M (C) be ormal. The spd (A) max(α 1,β 1 ), (3.1) where ad α 1 = 3 β 1 = 3 max i,,..., a ki + k=1 k i a kj + a ii a jj k=1 k j ( ) A tra +v(a) RetrAdrA.

Electroic Joural of Liear Algebra ISSN 1081-3810 A publicatio of the Iteratioal Liear Algebra Society Volume 7, pp. 89-906, December 014 http://math.techio.ac.il/iic/ela Eigevalue Localizatio 903 where Lemma 3.. Let A = [a ij ] M (C) be ormal. The spd(a) max(α,β ), (3.) ad β = max i,,..., α = 3 max i,,..., a ij a ii a jj + (a ii a jj ) +4a ij a ji + a ij + a ij. Theorem 3.3. Let A = [a ij ] M (C) be ormal with 3. The at least of the eigevalues of A lie i the disk z tra ( ) 1 A tra max(α 1,α,β 1,β ). (3.3) I particular, at least of the eigevalues of A lie i the disk z tra 1 A tra 3 max i,,..., a ij. (3.4) Proof. Let l S, where S is the set defied i the proof of Theorem.13. The + ( 1) max ( α 1,α,β 1,β ) + 1 spd (A) (by Lemmas 3.1 ad 3.) 1 A tra (by (.17)). (3.5) Now, (3.3) follows from Theorem.13 ad (3.5), while (3.4) is a special case of (3.3). The costat 3 i (3.4) ca be improved if the matrix A is Hermitia. This improvemet ca be achieved usig a result of Mirsky [10] that says if A = [a ij ] M (C) is Hermitia, the ( spd (A) max 4 a ij +(a ii a jj ) ). (3.6) i,,...,

Electroic Joural of Liear Algebra ISSN 1081-3810 A publicatio of the Iteratioal Liear Algebra Society Volume 7, pp. 89-906, December 014 http://math.techio.ac.il/iic/ela 904 I.H. Gumus, O. Hirzallah, ad F. Kittaeh I fact, through Lemma 3.1, Bhatia ad Sharma itroduced a remarkable improvemet of (3.6). This improvemet asserts if A = [a ij ] M (C) is Hermitia with 3, the spd (A) max a ik + a kj + (a ii a jj ). (3.7) i,,..., k=1 k i k=1 k j Based o (3.7) ad usig a proof similar to that give for Theorem 3.3, we have the followig result. Theorem 3.4. Let A = [a ij ] M (C) be Hermitia with 3. The at least of the eigevalues of A lie i the disk z tra 1 A tra max a ik + a kj (aii ajj) +. (3.8) i,,..., k=1 k i k=1 k j A applicatio of (3.4) ca be see as follows. Applicatios of (3.3) ad (3.8) ca be deduced by a similar argumet. Corollary 3.5. Let A = [a ij ] M (C) be ormal with. The all the eigevalues of A lie i the disk z tra 1 A tra 3 4 max i,,..., a ij. (3.9) [ ] A 0 Proof. Let B = [b ij ] =. The B M (C) is ormal ad the eigevalues of B are the same as those of A with duplicate multiplicities. It follows from 0 A (3.4), applied to the matrix B, that the disk z trb 1 B trb 3 max i,,..., b ij (3.10) cotais at least of the eigevalues of B. Sice the eigevalues of B are ot simple, it follows from Remark.14 that these eigevalues lie i the disk (3.10). I

Electroic Joural of Liear Algebra ISSN 1081-3810 A publicatio of the Iteratioal Liear Algebra Society Volume 7, pp. 89-906, December 014 http://math.techio.ac.il/iic/ela Eigevalue Localizatio 905 particular, the eigevalues of A lie i this disk. Now, the result follows i view of the facts that B = A, trb = tra, ad max b ij = max a ij. i,,..., i,,..., Remark 3.6. Theorems3.3, 3.4, adcorollary3.5arebasedothelowerbouds for the spreads of ormal matrices metioed i this paper. Related localizatio results ca be obtaied usig further lower bouds for the spreads of ormal matrices (see, e.g., [5], [6], ad [8]). I the followig result, we utilize Theorem.6 ad the spectral theorem for ormal matrices to ivestigate the equality coditios of (1.1). Corollary 3.7. Let A M (C) with 3. The = 1 A tra. (3.11) for some l {1,...,} if ad oly if A is a scalar matrix or A is ormal with oly two distict eigevalues oe of multiplicity 1 ad the other is of multiplicity oe. Our fial result follows from Theorem.13, Corollary 3.7, ad Remark.14. Corollary 3.8. Let A M (C) with 3. If = 1 A tra (3.1) for some l {1,...,}, the A is ormal ad at least 1 of the eigevalues of A lie i the disk (.13). REFERENCES [1] R. Bhatia ad R. Sharma. Some iequalities for positive liear maps. Liear Algebra Appl., 436:156 1571, 01. [] P.J. Eberlei. O measures of o-ormality for matrices. Amer. Math. Moth., 7:995 996, 1965. [3] L. Elser ad M.H.C. Paardekooper. O measures of oormality of matrices. Liear Algebra Appl., 9:107 13, 1987. [4] T.-Z Huag ad L. Wag. Improvig bouds for eigevalues complex matrices usig traces. Liear Algebra Appl., 46:841 854, 007. [5] E. Jiag ad X. Zha. Lower bouds for the spread of a Hermitia matrix. Liear Algebra Appl., 56:153 163, 1997. [6] C. Johso, R. Kumar, ad H. Wolkowicz. Lower bouds for the spread of a matrix. Liear Algebra Appl., 71:161 173, 1985. [7] R. Kress, H.L. de Vries, ad R. Wegma. O oormal matrices. Liear Algebra Appl., 8:109 10, 1974.

Electroic Joural of Liear Algebra ISSN 1081-3810 A publicatio of the Iteratioal Liear Algebra Society Volume 7, pp. 89-906, December 014 http://math.techio.ac.il/iic/ela 906 I.H. Gumus, O. Hirzallah, ad F. Kittaeh [8] J. Merikoski ad R. Kumar. Characterizatios ad lower bouds for the spread of a ormal matrix. Liear Algebra Appl., 364:13 31, 003. [9] L. Mirsky. The spread of a matrix. Mathematika, 3:17 130, 1956. [10] L. Mirsky. Iequalities for ormal ad Hermitia matrices. Duke Math. J., 4:591 599, 1957. [11] O. Rojo, H. Rojo, R. Soto, ad T.Y. Tam. Eigevalues localizatio for complex matrices. Proyeccioes, 11:11 19, 199. [1] O. Rojo, R.L. Soto, ad H. Rojo. New eigevalue estimates for complex matrices. Comput. Math. Appl., 5:91 97, 1993. [13] P. Sargolzaei ad R.R. Rakhshaipur. Improvig the localizatio of eigevalues for complex matrices. Appl. Math. Sci., 5:1857 1864, 011. [14] P. Tarazaga. Eigevalue estimates for symmetric matrices, Liear Algebra Appl., 135:171 179, 1990. [15] X. Zha. Matrix Iequalities. Lecture Notes i Mathematics, Vol. 1790, Spriger-Verlag, Berli, 00.