Introduction to Real Analysis (Math 315) Martin Bohner

Similar documents
The Banach algebra of functions of bounded variation and the pointwise Helly selection theorem

Math 554 Integration

Problem Set 4: Solutions Math 201A: Fall 2016

MAT612-REAL ANALYSIS RIEMANN STIELTJES INTEGRAL

Appendix to Notes 8 (a)

UNIFORM CONVERGENCE MA 403: REAL ANALYSIS, INSTRUCTOR: B. V. LIMAYE

The Regulated and Riemann Integrals

FUNDAMENTALS OF REAL ANALYSIS by. III.1. Measurable functions. f 1 (

Calculus in R. Chapter Di erentiation

Regulated functions and the regulated integral

Entrance Exam, Real Analysis September 1, 2009 Solve exactly 6 out of the 8 problems. Compute the following and justify your computation: lim

Homework 4. (1) If f R[a, b], show that f 3 R[a, b]. If f + (x) = max{f(x), 0}, is f + R[a, b]? Justify your answer.

7.2 Riemann Integrable Functions

Chapter 4. Lebesgue Integration

Fourier series. Preliminary material on inner products. Suppose V is vector space over C and (, )

1. On some properties of definite integrals. We prove

Prof. Girardi, Math 703, Fall 2012 Homework Solutions: 1 8. Homework 1. in R, prove that. c k. sup. k n. sup. c k R = inf

Advanced Calculus I (Math 4209) Martin Bohner

Chapter 6. Riemann Integral

MATH 409 Advanced Calculus I Lecture 19: Riemann sums. Properties of integrals.

SOLUTIONS FOR ANALYSIS QUALIFYING EXAM, FALL (1 + µ(f n )) f(x) =. But we don t need the exact bound.) Set

Chapter 22. The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus

ON THE C-INTEGRAL BENEDETTO BONGIORNO

f(x)dx . Show that there 1, 0 < x 1 does not exist a differentiable function g : [ 1, 1] R such that g (x) = f(x) for all

Math 324 Course Notes: Brief description

The Bochner Integral and the Weak Property (N)

For a continuous function f : [a; b]! R we wish to define the Riemann integral

Week 7 Riemann Stieltjes Integration: Lectures 19-21

Presentation Problems 5

W. We shall do so one by one, starting with I 1, and we shall do it greedily, trying

Advanced Calculus: MATH 410 Uniform Convergence of Functions Professor David Levermore 11 December 2015

2 Definitions and Basic Properties of Extended Riemann Stieltjes Integrals

Review of Riemann Integral

A PROOF OF THE FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM OF CALCULUS USING HAUSDORFF MEASURES

Math 118: Honours Calculus II Winter, 2005 List of Theorems. L(P, f) U(Q, f). f exists for each ǫ > 0 there exists a partition P of [a, b] such that

Definite integral. Mathematics FRDIS MENDELU. Simona Fišnarová (Mendel University) Definite integral MENDELU 1 / 30

Definite integral. Mathematics FRDIS MENDELU

NOTES AND PROBLEMS: INTEGRATION THEORY

2 Fundamentals of Functional Analysis

Chapter 6. Infinite series

TOPICS IN FOURIER ANALYSIS-II. Contents

The Riemann Integral

The final exam will take place on Friday May 11th from 8am 11am in Evans room 60.

Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal, 55 (130) (2005), , Abbotsford. 1. Introduction

This is a short summary of Lebesgue integration theory, which will be used in the course.

arxiv: v1 [math.ca] 11 Jul 2011

Lecture 3 ( ) (translated and slightly adapted from lecture notes by Martin Klazar)

Math 61CM - Solutions to homework 9

Riemann Stieltjes Integration - Definition and Existence of Integral

a n+2 a n+1 M n a 2 a 1. (2)

STUDY GUIDE FOR BASIC EXAM

8.3 THE TRIGONOMETRIC FUNCTIONS. skipped 8.4 THE ALGEBRAIC COMPLETENESS OF THE COMPLEX FIELD. skipped 8.5 FOURIER SERIES

Approximation of functions belonging to the class L p (ω) β by linear operators

a n = 1 58 a n+1 1 = 57a n + 1 a n = 56(a n 1) 57 so 0 a n+1 1, and the required result is true, by induction.

1 Sequences. 2 Series. 2 SERIES Analysis Study Guide

MATH34032: Green s Functions, Integral Equations and the Calculus of Variations 1

A HELLY THEOREM FOR FUNCTIONS WITH VALUES IN METRIC SPACES. 1. Introduction

Fundamental Theorem of Calculus for Lebesgue Integration

Advanced Calculus: MATH 410 Notes on Integrals and Integrability Professor David Levermore 17 October 2004

Properties of the Riemann Integral

MATH 174A: PROBLEM SET 5. Suggested Solution

A product convergence theorem for Henstock Kurzweil integrals

Lecture 1: Introduction to integration theory and bounded variation

Phil Wertheimer UMD Math Qualifying Exam Solutions Analysis - January, 2015

EXAMPLES OF QUANTUM INTEGRALS

Hilbert Spaces. Chapter Inner product spaces

Functional Analysis I Solutions to Exercises. James C. Robinson

Question 1. Question 3. Question 4. Graduate Analysis I Chapter 5

Best Approximation in the 2-norm

Generalized Riemann Integral

11 An introduction to Riemann Integration

Best Approximation. Chapter The General Case

Introduction to Some Convergence theorems

Theory of the Integral

Integrals along Curves.

Review on Integration (Secs ) Review: Sec Origins of Calculus. Riemann Sums. New functions from old ones.

The heat kernel on R n

Math 321 Final Examination April 1995 Notation used in this exam: N. (1) S N (f,x) = f(t)e int dt e inx.

IMPORTANT THEOREMS CHEAT SHEET

Chapter 28. Fourier Series An Eigenvalue Problem.

LECTURE. INTEGRATION AND ANTIDERIVATIVE.

Week 10: Riemann integral and its properties

Math 301 Integration I

Continuous Random Variables

Lecture 1. Functional series. Pointwise and uniform convergence.

Properties of the Riemann Stieltjes Integral

Review. April 12, Definition 1.2 (Closed Set). A set S is closed if it contains all of its limit points. S := S S

f p dm = exp Use the Dominated Convergence Theorem to complete the exercise. ( d φ(tx))f(x) dx. Ψ (t) =

Chapter 5 : Continuous Random Variables

Riemann is the Mann! (But Lebesgue may besgue to differ.)

Analysis Comp Study Guide

Review of Calculus, cont d

Bounds for the Riemann Stieltjes integral via s-convex integrand or integrator

Math 360: A primitive integral and elementary functions

Preliminaries From Calculus

Solution to Fredholm Fuzzy Integral Equations with Degenerate Kernel

Calculus and linear algebra for biomedical engineering Week 11: The Riemann integral and its properties

arxiv: v1 [math.ca] 7 Mar 2012

Analysis III. Lecturer: Prof. Oleg Zaboronski, Typesetting: David Williams. Term 1, 2015

Theoretical foundations of Gaussian quadrature

Transcription:

ntroduction to Rel Anlysis (Mth 315) Spring 2005 Lecture Notes Mrtin Bohner Author ddress: Version from April 20, 2005 Deprtment of Mthemtics nd Sttistics, University of Missouri Roll, Roll, Missouri 65409-0020 E-mil ddress: bohner@umr.edu URL: http://www.umr.edu/~bohner

Contents Chpter 1. The Riemnn Stieltjes ntegrl 1 1.1. Functions of Bounded Vrition 1 1.2. The Totl Vrition Function 1 1.3. Riemnn Stieltjes Sums nd ntegrls 2 1.4. Nondecresing ntegrtors 3 Chpter 2. Sequences nd Series of Functions 5 2.1. Uniform Convergence 5 2.2. Properties of the Limit Function 5 2.3. Equicontinuous Fmilies of Functions 6 2.4. Weierstrß Approximtion Theorem 7 Chpter 3. Some Specil Functions 9 3.1. Power Series 9 3.2. Exponentil, Logrithmic, nd Trigonometric Functions 10 3.3. Fourier Series 10 3.4. The Gmm Function 12 Chpter 4. The Lebesgue ntegrl 13 4.1. The Lebesgue Mesure 13 4.2. Mesurble Functions 14 4.3. Summble Functions 15 4.4. ntegrble Functions 16 4.5. The Spces L p 17 4.6. Signed Mesures 18 iii

iv CONTENTS

CHAPTER 1 The Riemnn Stieltjes ntegrl 1.1. Functions of Bounded Vrition Definition 1.1. Let, b R with < b. A prtition P of [, b] is finite set of points {x 0, x 1,..., x n } with = x 0 < x 1 <... < x n 1 < x n = b. The set of ll prtitions of [, b] is denoted by P = P[, b]. f P P, then the norm of P = {x 0, x 1,..., x n } is defined by P = sup x i, where x i = x i x i 1, 1 i n. 1 i n Definition 1.2. Let f : [, b] R be function. We put (P, f) = n k=1 The totl vrition of f on [, b] is defined s f(x k ) f(x k 1 ) for P = {x 0,..., x n } P. b f = sup (P, f). P P f b f <, then f is sid to be of bounded vrition on [, b]. We write f BV[, b]. Exmple 1.3. f f is nondecresing on [, b], then f BV[, b]. Theorem 1.4. f f B[, b], then f BV[, b]. Theorem 1.5. BV[, b] B[, b]. 1.2. The Totl Vrition Function Lemm 1.6. BV[, b] BV[, x] for ll x (, b). Definition 1.7. For f BV[, b] we define the totl vrition function v f : [, b] R by v f (x) = x f for ll x [, b]. Lemm 1.8. f f BV[, b], then v f is nondecresing on [, b]. Lemm 1.9. f f BV[, b], then v f f is nondecresing on [, b]. Theorem 1.10. f BV[, b] iff f = g h with on [, b] nondecresing functions g nd h. 1

2 1. THE REMANN STELTJES NTEGRAL 1.3. Riemnn Stieltjes Sums nd ntegrls Definition 1.11. Let f, g : [, b] R be functions. Let P = {x 0,..., x n } P[, b] nd ξ = (ξ 1,..., ξ n ) such tht Then x k 1 ξ k x k for ll 1 k n. S(P, ξ, f, g) = n f(ξ k ) [g(x k ) g(x k 1 )] k=1 is clled Riemnn Stieltjes sum for f with respect to g. The function f is clled Riemnn Stieltjes integrble with respect to g over [, b], we write f R(g), if there exists number J with the following property: ε > 0 δ > 0 P P, P < δ : S(P, ξ, f, g) J < ε (independent of ξ). n this cse we write b fdg = J, nd J is clled the Riemnn Stieltjes integrl of f with respect to g over [, b]. The function f is lso clled integrnd (function) while g is clled integrtor (function). Theorem 1.12 (Fundmentl nequlity). f f B[, b], g BV[, b], nd f R(g), then b b fdg f g, where f = sup x b f(x). Exmple 1.13. f g(x) = x for ll x [, b], then f R(g) iff f R[, b]. { 0 if x t Exmple 1.14. f C[, b] nd g(x) = p if t < x b. Theorem 1.15. Let f R[, b] nd g C[, b]. Then f R(g) Exmple 1.16. 1 0 xd(x2 ) = 2/3. nd b fdg = Theorem 1.17. f f R(g) R(h), then f R(g + h) nd fd(g + h) = b fg. fdg + fdh. f f R(h) nd g R(h), then f + g R(h) nd (f + g)dh = fdh + gdh. f f R(g) nd ρ R, then ρf R(g), f R(ρg), nd (ρf)dg = fd(ρg) = ρ fdg. Lemm 1.18. f f R(g) on [, b] nd if c (, b), then f R(g) on [, c].

1.4. NONDECREASNG NTEGRATORS 3 Remrk 1.19. Similrly, the ssumptions of Lemm 1.18 lso imply f R(g) on [c, b]. Also, we mke the definition b fdg = fdg if < b. Theorem 1.20. f f R(g) on [, b] nd if c (, b), then b c fdg + b c fdg = Theorem 1.21. f f R(g), then g R(f), nd b fdg + Exmple 1.22. 2 xd x = 5/2. 1 b b fdg. gdf = f(b)g(b) f()g(). Theorem 1.23 (Min Existence Theorem). f f C[, b] nd g BV[, b], then f R(g). 1.4. Nondecresing ntegrtors Throughout this section we let f B[, b] nd α be nondecresing function on [, b]. Definition 1.24. f P P, then we define the lower nd upper sums L nd U by n L(P, f, α) = m k [α(x k ) α(x k 1 )], m k = min f(x) x k 1 x x k nd U(P, f, α) = k=1 n k=1 M k [α(x k ) α(x k 1 )], M k = mx x k 1 x x k f(x). We lso define the lower nd upper Riemnn Stieltjes integrls by b fdα = sup L(P, f, α) P P Lemm 1.25. b fdα, b fdα R. nd Theorem 1.26. f P, P P with P P, then b fdα = inf U(P, f, α). P P L(P, f, α) L(P, f, α) nd U(P, f, α) U(P, f, α). Theorem 1.27. b fdα b fdα. Theorem 1.28. f f C[, b] nd α is nondecresing on [, b], then f R(α) on [, b].

4 1. THE REMANN STELTJES NTEGRAL

CHAPTER 2 Sequences nd Series of Functions 2.1. Uniform Convergence Definition 2.1. Let {f n } n N be funtions defined on E R. Suppose {f n } converges for ll x E. Then f defined by f(x) = lim n f n(x) for x E is clled the limit function of {f n }. We lso sy tht f n f pointwise on E. f f n = n k=1 g k for functions g k, k N, then f is lso clled the sum of the series n k=1 g k, write k=1 g k. Exmple 2.2. (i) f n (x) = 4x + x 2 /n, x R. (ii) f n (x) = x n, x [0, 1]. (iii) f n (x) = lim m [cos(n!πx)] 2m, x R. (iv) f n (x) = sin(nx) n, x R. 2n 2 x if 0 x 1 2n 1 (v) f n (x) = 2n(1 nx) if 2n x 1 n 0 if 1 n x 1. Definition 2.3. We sy tht {f n } n N converges uniformly on E to function f if ε > 0 N N n N x E : f n (x) f(x) ε. f f n = n k=1 g k, we lso sy tht the series k=1 g k converges uniformly provided {f n } converges uniformly. Exmple 2.4. (i) f n (x) = x n, x [0, 1/2]. (ii) f n (x) = x n, x [0, 1]. Theorem 2.5 (Cuchy Criterion). The sequence {f n } n N converges uniformly on E iff ε > 0 N N m, n N x E : f n (x) f m (x) ε. Theorem 2.6 (Weierstrß M-Test). Suppose {g k } k N stisfies g k (x) M k x E k N nd M k converges. Then k=1 g k converges uniformly. k=1 2.2. Properties of the Limit Function Theorem 2.7. Suppose f n f uniformly on E. Let x be limit point of E nd suppose A n = lim t x f n (t) exists for ll n N. 5

6 2. SEQUENCES AND SERES OF FUNCTONS Then {A n } n N converges nd lim A n = lim f(t). n t x Theorem 2.8. f f n re continuous on E for ll n N nd f n f uniformly on E, then f is continuous on E. Corollry 2.9. f g k re continuous on E for ll k N nd k=1 g k converges unifomly on E, then k=1 g k is continuous on E. Definition 2.10. Let be metric spce. By C() we denote the spce of ll complexvlued, continuous, nd bounded functions on. The supnorm of f C() is defined by f = sup f(x) for f C(). x Theorem 2.11. (C(), d(f, g) = f g ) is complete metric spce. Theorem 2.12. Let α be nondecresing on [, b]. Suppose f n R(α) for ll n N nd f n f uniformly on [, b]. Then f R(α) on [, b] nd b fdα = lim n b f n (x)dα. Corollry 2.13. Let α be nondecresing on [, b]. Suppose g k R(α) on [, b] for ll k N nd k=1 g k converges uniformly on [, b]. Then b b g k dα = g k dα. k=1 Theorem 2.14. Let f n be differentible functions on [, b] for ll n N such tht {f n (x 0 )} n N converges for some x 0 [, b]. f {f n} n N converges uniformly on [, b], then {f n } n N converges uniformly on [, b], sy to f, nd k=1 f (x) = lim n f n(x) for ll x [, b]. Corollry 2.15. Suppose g k re differentible on [, b] for ll k N nd k=1 g k is uniformly convergent on [, b]. f k=1 g k(x 0 ) converges for some point x 0 [, b], then k=1 g k is uniformly convergent on [, b], nd ( ) g k = g k. k=1 k=1 2.3. Equicontinuous Fmilies of Functions Exmple 2.16. f n (x) = x 2 x 2 +(1 nx) 2, 0 x 1, n N. Definition 2.17. A fmily F of functions defined on E is sid to be equicontinuous on E if ε > 0 δ > 0 ( x, y E : x y < δ) f F : f(x) f(y) < ε. Theorem 2.18. Suppose K is compct, f n C(K) for ll n N, nd {f n } n N converges uniformly on K. Then the fmily F = {f n : n N} is equicontinuous. Definition 2.19. The sequence {f n } n N is clled pointwise bounded if there exists function φ such tht f n (x) < φ(x) for ll n N. t is clled uniformly bounded if there exists number M such tht f n M for ll n N.

2.4. WEERSTRASS APPROMATON THEOREM 7 Theorem 2.20. A pointwise bounded sequence {f n } n N on countble set E hs subsequence {f nk } k N such tht {f nk (x)} k N converges for ll x E. Theorem 2.21 (Arzelà Ascoli). Suppose K is compct nd {f n } n N C(K) is pointwise bounded nd equicontinuous. Then {f n } is uniformly bounded on K nd contins subsequence which is uniformly convergent on K. 2.4. Weierstrß Approximtion Theorem Theorem 2.22 (Weierstrß Approximtion Theorem). Let f C[, b]. Then there exists sequence of polynomils {P n } n N with P n f uniformly on [, b].

8 2. SEQUENCES AND SERES OF FUNCTONS

CHAPTER 3 Some Specil Functions 3.1. Power Series Definition 3.1. A function f is sid to be represented by power series round provided f(x) = c n (x ) n for some c n, n N 0. Such n f is clled nlytic. Theorem 3.2. f n=0 c n x n converges for x < R, n=0 then it converges uniformly on [ R + ε, R ε] for ll ε > 0. Also, f defined by f(x) = c n x n for x < R n=0 is continuous nd differentible on ( R, R) with f (x) = (n + 1)c n+1 x n for x < R. n=0 Corollry 3.3. Under the hypotheses of Theorem 3.2, f (n) exists for ll n N nd f (k) (x) = n(n 1)... (n k + 1)c n x n k holds on ( R, R). n prticulr, n=k f (n) (0) = n!c n for ll n N 0. Theorem 3.4 (Abel s Theorem). Suppose n=0 c n converges. Put f(x) = c n x n for x ( 1, 1). Then n=0 lim f(x) = x 1 c n. Theorem 3.5. Suppose n=0 n, n=0 b n, nd n=0 c n converge to A, B, nd C, where c n = n k=0 kb n k. Then C = AB. 9 n=0

10 3. SOME SPECAL FUNCTONS Theorem 3.6. Given double sequence { ij } i,j N. f ij = b i for ll i N nd then j=1 i=1 j=1 j=1 i=1 b i converges, i=1 ij = ij. Theorem 3.7 (Tylor s Theorem). Suppose n=0 c nx n converges in ( R, R) nd put f(x) = n=0 c nx n. Then f (n) () f(x) = (x ) n for x < R. n! n=0 3.2. Exponentil, Logrithmic, nd Trigonometric Functions Definition 3.8. We define the exponentil function by z k E(z) = for ll z C. k! k=0 Remrk 3.9. n this remrk, some properties of the exponentil function re discussed. Definition 3.10. We define the trigonometric functions by C(x) = E(ix) + E( ix) 2 nd S(x) = E(ix) E( ix). 2i Remrk 3.11. n this remrk, some properties of trigonometric functions re discussed. 3.3. Fourier Series Definition 3.12. A trigonometric polynomil is sum N f(x) = 0 + ( n cos(nx) + b n sin(nx)), where k, b k C. n=1 A trigonometric series is series f(x) = 0 + ( n cos(nx) + b n sin(nx)). n=1 Remrk 3.13. n this remrk, some properties of trigonometric series re discussed. Definition 3.14. A sequence {φ n } n N is clled n orthogonl system of functions on [, b] if f, in ddition φ n, φ m := b φ n (x)φ m (x)dx = 0 for ll m n. φ n 2 2 := φ n, φ n = 1 for ll n N, then {φ n } is clled orthonorml on [, b]. f {φ n } is orthonorml on [, b], then c n = f, φ n for ll n N

3.3. FOURER SERES 11 re clled the Fourier coefficients of function f reltive to {φ n }, nd f(x) c n φ n (x) is clled the Fourier series of f. n=1 Theorem 3.15. Let {φ n } be orthonorml on [, b]. Let n s n (f; x) := s n (x) := c m φ m (x), where f(x) nd put t n (x) = m=1 n γ m φ m (x) with γ m C. m=1 Then f s n 2 2 f t n 2 2 with equlity if γ m = c m for ll m N. c m φ m (x), Theorem 3.16 (Bessel s nequlity). f {φ n } is orthonorml on [, b] nd if f(x) n=1 c nφ n (x), then c n 2 f 2 2. n prticulr, lim n c n = 0. n=1 Definition 3.17. The Dirichlet kernel is defined by N D N (x) = e inx for ll x R. n= N Remrk 3.18. n this remrk, some properties of the Dirichlet kernel re discussed. Theorem 3.19 (Locliztion Theorem). f, for some x R, there exist δ > 0 nd M < with f(x + t) f(x) M t for ll t ( δ, δ), then lim s N(f; x) = f(x). N Corollry 3.20. f f(x) = 0 for ll x in some intervl J, then s N (f; x) 0 s N for ll x J. Theorem 3.21 (Prsevl s Formul). f f nd g hve period 2π nd re Riemnn integrble, f(x) c n e inx nd g(x) γ n e inx, then nd n= 1 π f(x)g(x)dx = 2π π lim N n= c n γ n, n= m=1 1 π f(x) 2 dx = 2π π 1 f(x) s N (f; x) 2 dx = 0. 2π n= c n 2

12 3. SOME SPECAL FUNCTONS 3.4. The Gmm Function Definition 3.22. For x (0, ), we define the Gmm function s Γ(x) = 0 t x 1 e t dt. Theorem 3.23. The Gmm function stisfies the following. (i) Γ(x + 1) = xγ(x) for ll x (0, ); (ii) Γ(n + 1) = n! for ll n N; (iii) log Γ is convex on (0, ). Theorem 3.24. f f is positive function on (0, ) such tht f(x + 1) = xf(x) for ll x (0, ), f(1) = 1, log f is convex, then f(x) = Γ(x) for ll x (0, ). Theorem 3.25. We hve n!n x Γ(x) = lim n x(x + 1)... (x + n). Definition 3.26. For x > 0 nd y > 0, we define the Bet function by B(x, y) = Theorem 3.27. f x > 0 nd y > 0, then 1 0 t x 1 (1 t) y 1 dt. B(x, y) = Γ(x)Γ(y) Γ(x + y). Exmple 3.28. Γ(1/2) = π nd e s2 ds = π. Theorem 3.29 (Stirling s Formul). We hve lim x Γ(x + 1) ( x e ) x 2πx = 1.

CHAPTER 4 The Lebesgue ntegrl 4.1. The Lebesgue Mesure Exmple 4.1. n this exmple, the method of the Lebesgue integrl is discussed. Definition 4.2. Let = 1.. N, b = b 1.. b N R N. We write b if i b i for ll 1 i N. The set [, b] = {x R N : x b} is clled closed intervl. The volume of = [, b] is defined by N = (b i i ). i=1 Similrly we define intervls (, b], [, b), nd (, b), nd their volumes re defined to be [, b], too. Lemm 4.3. f, k, J k denote intervls in R N, then (i) J = J ; (ii) = n j=1 j = = n j=1 j ; (iii) n j=1 J j = n j=1 J j. Definition 4.4. We define the outer mesure of ny set A R N by µ (A) = inf j : A j nd j re closed intervls for ll j N. j=1 j=1 Exmple 4.5. For A = {} we hve µ (A) = 0. Lemm 4.6. The outer mesure µ is (i) monotone: A B = µ (A) µ (B); (ii) subdditive: µ ( k=1 A k) k=1 µ (A k ). Exmple 4.7. Ech countble set C hs µ (C) = 0. Lemm 4.8. f is n intervl, then µ () =. Lemm 4.9. (i) f d(a, B) > 0, then µ (A B) = µ (A) + µ (B); (ii) if A k k nd {k o} k N re pirwise disjoint, then µ ( k=1 A k) = k=1 µ (A k ). Theorem 4.10. We hve A R N ε > 0 O A : O open nd µ (O) < µ (A) + ε. 13

14 4. THE LEBESGUE NTEGRAL Definition 4.11. A set A R N is clled Lebesgue mesurble (or L-mesurble) if ε > 0 O A : O open nd µ (O \ A) ε. f A is L-mesurble, then µ(a) = µ (A) is clled its L-mesure. Theorem 4.12. The countble union of L-mesurble sets is L-mesurble. Theorem 4.13 (Exmples of L-mesurble Sets). Open, compct, closed, nd sets with outer mesure zero re L-mesurble. Theorem 4.14. f A is L-mesurble, then B = A c cn be written s B = N F k, k=1 where µ (N) = 0 nd F k re closed for ll k N. Definition 4.15. For set A we define the power set P(A) by P(A) = {B : B A}. Definition 4.16. A P() is clled σ-lgebr in provided (i) A; (ii) A A = A c A; (iii) A k A k N = k=1 A k A. Theorem 4.17. The collection of ll L-mesurble subsets of R N is σ-lgebr. Theorem 4.18. A R N is L-mesurble iff for ll ε > 0 there is closed set F A with µ (A \ F ) < ε. Definition 4.19. A triple (, A, µ) is clled mesure spce if (i) ; (ii) A is σ-lgebr on ; (iii) µ is nonnegtive nd σ-dditive function on A with µ( ) = 0. The spce is clled complete if ech subset B A with µ(a) = 0 stisfies µ(b) = 0. Theorem 4.20. (R N, A, µ) is complete mesure spce, where A is the set of ll L- mesurble sets, nd µ is the L-mesure. 4.2. Mesurble Functions Throughout this section, (, A, µ) is mesure spce. Definition 4.21. A function f : R is clled mesurble if for ech R, is mesurble (i.e., is n element of A). (f ) := {x : f(x) } Exmple 4.22 (Exmples of Mesurble Functions). (i) Constnt functions re mesurble. (ii) Chrcteristic functions K E re mesurble iff E is mesurble. (iii) f = R nd µ = µ L, then continuous nd monotone functions re mesurble. Theorem 4.23. f f nd g re mesurble, then re mesurble. (f < g), (f g), nd (f = g)

4.3. SUMMABLE FUNCTONS 15 Theorem 4.24. f c R, f nd g re mesurble, then re mesurble. cf, f + g, fg, f, f + = sup(f, 0), nd f = sup( f, 0) Theorem 4.25. f f n : R re mesurble for ll n N, then re mesurble. sup f n, n N inf f n, n N lim sup f n, nd lim inf f n n n Definition 4.26. We sy tht two functions f, g : R re equl lmost everywhere nd write f g, if there exists N A with µ(n) = 0 nd {x : f(x) g(x)} N. Theorem 4.27. f f, g : R, f is mesurble, nd f g, then g is mesurble, too, provided the mesure spce is complete. 4.3. Summble Functions Definition 4.28. A mesurble function f : [0, ] is clled summble. Nottion 4.29. For summble function f, we introduce the following nottion: A 0 (f) = {x : f(x) = 0}, A (f) = {x : f(x) = }, { k 1 A nk (f) = x : 2 n < f(x) k } 2 n, s n (f) = k=1 k 1 2 n µ (A nk(f)) + µ (A (f)). Theorem 4.30. Let f nd g be summble. Then for ll n N, (i) s n (f) s n+1 (f); (ii) f g = s n (f) s n (g); (iii) f g = s n (f) = s n (g). Definition 4.31. f f is summble, then we define fdµ = lim s n(f). n f B is mesurble, then we define fdµ = fk B dµ. B Theorem 4.32. f f nd g re summble with f g, then fdµ gdµ. Theorem 4.33. f f nd g re summble with f g, then fdµ = gdµ. Exmple 4.34. Let c 0 nd A be mesurble. Then cdµ = cµ(a). A

16 4. THE LEBESGUE NTEGRAL Theorem 4.35. f f is summble, then f 0 fdµ = 0. Theorem 4.36. Let (, A, µ) be mesure spce nd f be summble on. Define ν(a) = fdµ. Then (, A, ν) is mesure spce. Theorem 4.37. f f is summble nd c 0, then (cf)dµ = c fdµ. Theorem 4.38 (Beppo Levi; Monotone Convergence Theorem). Let f nd f n be summble for ll n N such tht f n is monotoniclly incresing to f, i.e., f n (x) f n+1 (x) for ll n N nd f n (x) f(x), n, for ll x. Then lim n A f n dµ = fdµ. Theorem 4.39. f f nd g re summble, then (f + g)dµ = fdµ + gdµ. Theorem 4.40 (Ftou Lemm). f f n re summble for ll n N, then lim inf f ndµ lim inf f n dµ. n n 4.4. ntegrble Functions f f : R is mesurble, then f + nd f re mesurble by Theorem 4.24 nd hence summble. f f dµ <, then becuse of f + f, f f, nd monotonicity, we hve f + dµ < nd f dµ <. Definition 4.41. A mesurble function f : R is clled integrble if f dµ <, we write f L(), nd then we define fdµ = f + dµ f dµ nd A fdµ = fk A dµ if fk A is integrble. Lemm 4.42. (i) f f is integrble, then µ(a ( f )) = 0; (ii) if f is integrble nd f g, then so is g (in complete mesure spce); (iii) if f nd g re integrble nd f g, then fdµ = gdµ; (iv) if f : R is integrble nd f = g h such tht g, h 0 re integrble, then fdµ = gdµ hdµ. Theorem 4.43. The integrl is homogeneous nd liner.

4.5. THE SPACES L p 17 Theorem 4.44 (Lebesgue; Dominted Convergence Theorem). Suppose f n : R re integrble for ll n N. f f n f, n (pointwise) nd if there exists n integrble function g : [0, ] with then f n (x) g(x) for ll x nd ll n N, fdµ = lim f n dµ. n Theorem 4.45. Let be n rbitrry intervl, suppose f(x, ) is Lebesgue integrble on for ech x [, b], nd define the Lebesgue integrl F (x) := f(x, y)dy. (i) f for ech y the function f(, y) is continuous on [, b] nd if there exists g L() such tht f(x, y) g(y) for ll x [, b] nd ll y, then F is continuous on [, b]. (ii) f for ech y the function f(, y) is differentible with respect to x nd if there exists g L() such tht f(x, y) x g(y) for ll x [, b] nd ll y, then F is differentible on [, b], nd we hve the formul F f(x, y) (x) = dy. x Theorem 4.46. f f : [, b] R is Riemnn integrble, then it is lso Lebesgue integrble, nd the two integrls re the sme. Theorem 4.47 (Arzelà). f f n R[, b] converge pointwise to f R[, b] nd re uniformly bounded, i.e., f n (x) M for ll x [, b] nd ll n N, then the Riemnn integrl stisfies b lim n f n dx = b fdx. 4.5. The Spces L p Definition 4.48. Let p 1. Let be n intervl. We define the spce L p () s the set of ll mesurble functions with the property f p L(). Theorem 4.49. L p () is liner spce. Theorem 4.50 (Hölder). Suppose p, q > 1 stisfy 1/p + 1/q = 1. g L q (). Then fg L 1 () nd ( ) 1/p ( 1/q fgdx f p dx g dx) q. Let f L p () nd

18 4. THE LEBESGUE NTEGRAL Theorem 4.51 (Minkowski). For f, g L p () we hve ( 1/p ( 1/p ( 1/p f + g dx) p f dx) p + g dx) p. Definition 4.52. For ech f L p () we define ( 1/p f p := f dx) p. Lemm 4.53. Suppose g k L p () for ll k N such tht n=1 g n p converges. Then n=1 g n converges to function s L p () in the L p -sense. Theorem 4.54. L p () is Bnch spce. Remrk 4.55. n this remrk, some connections to probbility theory re discussed. Definition 4.56. We sy tht sequence of complex functions {φ n } is n orthonorml set of functions on { 0 if n m φ n φ m dx = 1 if n = m. f f L 2 () nd if then we write c n = fφ n dx for n N, f c n φ n. n=1 Theorem 4.57 (Riesz Fischer). Let {φ n } be orthonorml on. Suppose n=1 c n 2 converges nd put s n = n k=1 c kφ k. Then there exists function f L 2 () such tht {s n } converges to f in the L 2 -sense, nd f c n φ n. n=1 Definition 4.58. An orthonorml set {φ n } is sid to be complete if, for f L 2 (), the equtions fφ n dx = 0 for ll n N imply tht f = 0. Theorem 4.59 (Prsevl). Let {φ n } be complete orthonorml set. f f L 2 () nd if f c n φ n, then n=1 f 2 dx = c n 2. n=1 4.6. Signed Mesures