APOLLO SCAFFOLDING SERVICES LTD SPIGOT CONNECTION TO EUROCODES DESIGN CHECK CALCULATIONS

Similar documents
APOLLO SALES LTD PUBLIC ACCESS SCAFFOLD STEP DESIGN CHECK CALCULATIONS

Job No. Sheet 1 of 6 Rev B. Made by IR Date Oct Checked by FH/NB Date Oct Revised by MEB Date April 2006

Made by PTY/AAT Date Jan 2006

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach

Application nr. 3 (Ultimate Limit State) Resistance of member cross-section

Application nr. 7 (Connections) Strength of bolted connections to EN (Eurocode 3, Part 1.8)

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach

STEEL BUILDINGS IN EUROPE. Multi-Storey Steel Buildings Part 8: Description of member resistance calculator

Example 4: Design of a Rigid Column Bracket (Bolted)

Made by SMH Date Aug Checked by NRB Date Dec Revised by MEB Date April 2006

Design of Compression Members

Structural Calculations for Juliet balconies using BALCONY 2 System (Aerofoil) handrail. Our ref: JULB2NB Date of issue: March 2017

CALCULATION MODE FOR ALUHD23/SH18 Traction and shear aluminium plate for Alufoot R system

Eurocode 3 for Dummies The Opportunities and Traps

FHWA Bridge Design Guidance No. 1 Revision Date: July 21, Load Rating Evaluation of Gusset Plates in Truss Bridges

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach

twenty steel construction: columns & tension members ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS FALL 2013 lecture


VALLOUREC & MANNESMANN TUBES. Design-support for MSH sections

STEEL BUILDINGS IN EUROPE. Multi-Storey Steel Buildings Part 10: Technical Software Specification for Composite Beams

Design of Beams (Unit - 8)

Design of AAC wall panel according to EN 12602

Delhi Noida Bhopal Hyderabad Jaipur Lucknow Indore Pune Bhubaneswar Kolkata Patna Web: Ph:

GENERAL GEOMETRY LEFT SIDE BEAM RIGHT SIDE BS :2000/AC:2009. Ratio 0.17

Job No. Sheet 1 of 7 Rev A. Made by ER/EM Date Feb Checked by HB Date March 2006

DESIGN AND DETAILING OF COUNTERFORT RETAINING WALL

Presented by: Civil Engineering Academy

STEEL MEMBER DESIGN (EN :2005)

BRACING MEMBERS SUMMARY. OBJECTIVES. REFERENCES.

REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN 1. Design of Column (Examples and Tutorials)

Fundamentals of Structural Design Part of Steel Structures

Mechanics of Materials CIVL 3322 / MECH 3322

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX 22/09/2016

The University of Melbourne Engineering Mechanics

Civil Engineering Design (1) Design of Reinforced Concrete Columns 2006/7

ON THE DESIGN OF A STEEL END-PLATE BEAM-TO-COLUMN BOLTED JOINT ACCORDING TO PN-EN

A CONNECTION ELEMENT FOR MODELLING END-PLATE CONNECTIONS IN FIRE

five Mechanics of Materials 1 ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2017 lecture

Reinforced concrete structures II. 4.5 Column Design

DESIGN GUIDES FOR HIGH STRENGTH STRUCTURAL HOLLOW SECTIONS MANUFACTURED BY SSAB - FOR EN 1090 APPLICATIONS

UNIVERSITY OF BOLTON SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING. BEng (HONS) CIVIL ENGINEERING SEMESTER 1 EXAMINATION 2016/2017 MATHEMATICS & STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

DESIGN OF STAIRCASE. Dr. Izni Syahrizal bin Ibrahim. Faculty of Civil Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

2012 MECHANICS OF SOLIDS

Interactive Buckling of Cold-Formed Steel Sections Applied in Pallet Rack Upright Members

Mechanics of Materials

Basis of Design, a case study building

Clayey sand (SC)

Delft Applied Mechanics Course: Statics AE1-914-I. 18 August 2004, 9:00 12:00

Tower Cranes & Foundations The Interface & CIRIA C654 Stuart Marchand C.Eng. FICE FIStructE Director Wentworth House Partnership

Mechanics of Materials Primer

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar

Part 1 is to be completed without notes, beam tables or a calculator. DO NOT turn Part 2 over until you have completed and turned in Part 1.

Determine the resultant internal loadings acting on the cross section at C of the beam shown in Fig. 1 4a.

Finite Element Modelling with Plastic Hinges

Bridge deck modelling and design process for bridges

Made by SMH Date Aug Checked by NRB Date Nov Revised by MEB Date April 2006

CONNECTION DESIGN. Connections must be designed at the strength limit state

Question 1. Ignore bottom surface. Solution: Design variables: X = (R, H) Objective function: maximize volume, πr 2 H OR Minimize, f(x) = πr 2 H

Please review the following statement: I certify that I have not given unauthorized aid nor have I received aid in the completion of this exam.

Limit State Design of Steel Pin Connections for Bamboo Truss Structures

= = = 1,000 1,000 1,250. g M0 g M1 g M2 = = = 1,100 1,100 1,250 [ ] 1 0,000 8,000 HE 140 B 0,0. [m] Permanent Permanent Variable Variable Variable

Verification of a Micropile Foundation

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of a Trans-National Approach

Associate Professor. Tel:

QUESTION BANK DEPARTMENT: CIVIL SEMESTER: III SUBJECT CODE: CE2201 SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS UNIT 1- STRESS AND STRAIN PART A

B.Tech. Civil (Construction Management) / B.Tech. Civil (Water Resources Engineering)

STRENGTH OF MATERIALS-I. Unit-1. Simple stresses and strains

Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2014 Design of fixed beam-to-column connection EN :2005/AC:2009

QUESTION BANK SEMESTER: III SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS

LOAD BEARING CAPACITY OF SPLICED COLUMNS WITH SINGLE ROW BOLTED BUTT-PLATES

THEME IS FIRST OCCURANCE OF YIELDING THE LIMIT?

COLUMNS: BUCKLING (DIFFERENT ENDS)

3.5 Analysis of Members under Flexure (Part IV)

PLATE GIRDERS II. Load. Web plate Welds A Longitudinal elevation. Fig. 1 A typical Plate Girder

DESIGN OF BEAMS AND SHAFTS

Slenderness Effects for Concrete Columns in Sway Frame - Moment Magnification Method (CSA A )

Timber and Steel Design. Lecture 11. Bolted Connections

STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS

CH. 5 TRUSSES BASIC PRINCIPLES TRUSS ANALYSIS. Typical depth-to-span ratios range from 1:10 to 1:20. First: determine loads in various members

Project data Project name Project number Author Description Date 26/04/2017 Design code AISC dome anchor. Material.

RESILIENT INFRASTRUCTURE June 1 4, 2016

ARC 341 Structural Analysis II. Lecture 10: MM1.3 MM1.13

Advanced Analysis of Steel Structures

Tension Members. ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures. II. Tension Members. Introduction. Introduction (cont.)

Materials Selection and Design Materials Selection - Practice

EAS 664/4 Principle Structural Design

Fire resistance assessment of composite steel-concrete structures

2014 MECHANICS OF MATERIALS

COMPLEX TRUSS ANALOGY USING PLASTIC AND ELASTIC ANALYSIS

JointsForTekla Ver January

Hilti North America Installation Technical Manual Technical Data MI System Version

D : SOLID MECHANICS. Q. 1 Q. 9 carry one mark each.

OUTCOME 1 - TUTORIAL 3 BENDING MOMENTS. You should judge your progress by completing the self assessment exercises. CONTENTS

Supplement: Statically Indeterminate Trusses and Frames

Torsion Stresses in Tubes and Rods

NORMAL STRESS. The simplest form of stress is normal stress/direct stress, which is the stress perpendicular to the surface on which it acts.

14. *14.8 CASTIGLIANO S THEOREM

Improving fire resistance of existing concrete slabs by concrete topping

CE5510 Advanced Structural Concrete Design - Design & Detailing of Openings in RC Flexural Members-

Roadway Grade = m, amsl HWM = Roadway grade dictates elevation of superstructure and not minimum free board requirement.

Transcription:

Alan White Design APOLLO SCAFFOLDING SERVICES LTD SPIGOT CONNECTION TO EUROCODES DESIGN CHECK CALCULATIONS Alan N White B.Sc., M.Eng., C.Eng., M.I.C.E., M.I.H.T. JUL 2013 Somerset House 11 Somerset Place GLASGOW G3 7JT Tel:0141 354 6579 Fax:0141 354 6549 S0140/001

Brief Project : Apollo beams - Spigot connection Element : Brief Document No : 001 Checked :anw Date: Jul 13 To check the capacity of the spigot for connecting booms of Apollo aluminium truss beams. Three beams will be examined as below: Alan white design 300mm ladder beam 450 lattice beam 750 X-beam Page 1of 11

Design Project : Element : Apollo beams - Spigot connection Brief Document No : 001 Checked :anw Date: Jul 13 Alan white design Design of Steel Structures EN 1993-1-1 Design of Aluminium Structures EN-1999-1-1 The following AWD documents are referenced: Apollo alloy lattice beam calc S0072-001 Apollo alloy ladder beam calc R0141-001 Apollo alloy X-beam calc R0076-001 Design assumptions Steelwork yield strength for CHS members is 355N/mm 2 Analysis Aluminium yield strength for Solid bar is 255N/mm 2 All bolts M12 Grade 8.8 Note the steel design factor of safety is 1.5 for live loads From the calculations for the ladder beam R0141-001 The capacities of the boom are: Moment Shear Tension Compression 0.92 knm 48.74 knm 91.69 kn 88.72 kn From the calulations for the lattice beam S0072-001: Moment Shear Tension Compression 0.92 knm 48.74 knm 91.69 kn 80.47 kn From the calculations for the X-beam R0076-001: Moment Shear Tension Compression 1.04 knm 48.74 knm 91.69 kn 120.2 kn Page 2of 11

Project : Element : Apollo beams - Spigot connection Brief Document No : 001 Checked :anw Date: Jul 13 Alan white design Design capacities From above the spigots require to have the following capacities Moment Shear Tension Compression 1.04 knm 48.74 knm 91.69 kn 120.20 kn Page 3of 11

Project : Apollo beams - Spigot connection Element : Steel Spigot Capacity Document No : 001 Checked :anw Date: Jul 13 Alan white design Steel Spigot Section 38.1 x 4.06 CHS S355 Steel Spigot Section A= 434 mm 2 I= 63781 mm 4 W el,x = 3348 mm 3 W pl,x = 4520 mm 3 r y = 12 mm Applied Loads Steel Spigot Bending moment Steel Spigot Shear Moment M Rd,x = 1.04 knm Shear V Rd = 48.74 kn Tension N u,rd = 91.69 kn Compression N b,rd = 120.20 kn M cr,x = W p,l.f y /g m0 W pl,x = 4.52 cm 3 f y = 355 N/mm 2 g m0 = 1.00 = 4.52*355/1000 = 1.60 knm > 1.04 knm ok V cr = A v.f y /sqrt(3)/g m0 A v = 0.6A A v = 260 mm 2 f y = 355 N/mm 2 g m0 = 1.00 = 260*355/sqrt(3)/1000 = 53.29 kn > 48.74 kn ok Page 4of 11

λ - = Af y /N cr A= 434 mm 2 Calculation sheet Project : Element : Apollo beams - Spigot connection Steel Spigot Capacity Document No : 001 Checked :anw Date: Jul 13 Alan white design Steel Spigot Tension plastic resistance N plr = A.f y /g m0 A e = A-A (2 bolt holes) = 328.44*355/1000 = 116.60 kn A e = 434-2*13*4.06 A e = 328.44 mm 2 f y = 355 N/mm 2 g m0 = 1.00 ultimate resistance N ur = 0.9A.f u /g m2 0.9A= 296 mm 2 = 296*510/1250 = 120.77 kn f u = 510 N/mm 2 g m2 = 1.25 Steel Spigot Compression Lesser Value= 116.60 kn > 91.69 kn ok. N b,rd = Χ A f y /g m2 Χ= 1/ϕ+ ϕ 2 -λ -2 ϕ= 0.5(1+α(λ - -0.2)+λ -2 λ - = A.f y /N cr α= 0.21 Table 6.1 N cr = π 2 EI/L 2 E= 210000 N/mm 2 = pi()^2*210000*63781/(220^2) = 2,731,272.31 N I= 63781 mm 4 L= 220 mm = 0.24 ϕ= 0.5(1+α(λ - -0.2)+λ -2 ) = 0.53 f y = 355 N/mm 2 α= 0.21 Table 6.1 Χ= 1/ϕ+ ϕ 2 -λ -2 = 0.99 N b,rd = Χ A f y /g m0 N b,rd = 152.85 kn > 120.20 kn ok Page 5of 11

F b,rd = k 1 α b f u d t / g M2 d o = 13 mm F b,rd = k 1 α b f u d t / g M2 d o = 13 mm Calculation sheet Bearing in spigot Project : Element : Apollo beams - Spigot connection Steel Spigot Capacity Document No : 001 Checked :anw Date: Jul 13 Alan white design Bolts are M12 grade 8.8 F b,rd = (2.5*1.00*510*12*4.06)/1250 = 49.69 kn e 1 = e 2 = k 1 = 6.92 >2.5 therefore k 1 = 2.5 t= 4.06 mm d= 12 mm f u = 510 N/mm 2 f ub = 800 N/mm 2 g M2 = 1.25 α b = 1.03 >1 Therefore, α b = 1.00 Load transferred via 2No Bolts with 2No holes leading to 4No Bearing surfaces Total Bearing capacity= 4*49.69 F b,rd = 198.76 kn > 120.20 kn ok Bearing in boom Bolts are M12 grade 8.8 F b,rd = (2.5*1*295*12*4.4)/1250 = 31.15 kn e 1 = e 2 = k 1 = 6.92 >2.5 therefore k 1 = 2.5 t= 4.4 mm d= 12 mm f u = 295 N/mm 2 f ub = 800 N/mm 2 g M2 = 1.25 α b = 1.03 >1 Therefore, α b = 1.00 Load transferred via 2No Bolts with 2No holes leading to 4No Bearing surfaces Total Bearing capacity= 4*31.15 F b,rd = 124.60 kn > 120.20 kn ok Page 6of 11

Project : Apollo beams - Spigot connection Element : Aluminium Spigot Capacity Document No : 001 Checked : anw Date: Jul 13 Alan white design Aluminium Spigot Section 38.1 mm CHS The section of the aluminium spigot is a solid bar with 2 holes through each end to match the holes in the end of the booms. Aluminium Spigot Section A= 11 2 I= 103435 mm 4 W el,x = 5430 mm 3 W pl,x = 9230 mm 3 r y = 10 mm Applied Loads Moment M Rd,x = 1.04 knm Shear V Rd = 48.74 kn Tension N u,rd = 91.69 kn Compression N b,rd = 120.20 kn Aluminium Spigot Moment Capacity (6.2.5.1) M c,rd = aw el f o / g M1 a = W pl/w el (Table 6.4) = 1.70 W el = 5.43 cm 3 f o = 255 N/mm 2 g M1 = 1.10 (6.1.3) = 1.70*5.43*255/1100 M c,rd = 2.14 knm > 1.0 knm ok Aluminium Spigot Shear Capacity (6.2.6) V Rd = A v f o / 3g M1 = 912*255/(SQRT(3)*1100) V Rd = 122.06 kn > 48.7 kn A v = 0.8A e = 912 mm 2 g M1 = 1.10 f o = 255 N/mm 2 Page 7of 11

General yielding N o,rd = A g f o /g M1 f o = 255 N/mm 2 Calculation sheet Project : Element : Apollo beams - Spigot connection Aluminium Spigot Capacity Document No : 001 Checked : anw Date: Jul 13 Alan white design Aluminium Spigot Axial Tension Capacity (6.2.3) Local failure = 1140*255/1100 = 264.27 kn A g = 11 2 g M1 = 1.1 N u,rd = 0.9 A net f u /g M2 f u = 295 N/mm 2 = 0.9*644.7*295/1250 = 136.79 kn A net = A-A (1 Bolt Hole) = 644.7 mm 2 g M1 = 1.25 Lesser Value= 136.79 kn > 91.7 kn Aluminium Spigot Compression Capacity N b,rd = k X A eff f o /g M1 k= ω x ω x = r u,haz f u / g M2 f o / g M1 = (0.64*290/1.25)/(250/1.1) = 0.65 k= 0.65 N cr = π 2 EI / k 2 L 2 E = 70,000 N/mm 2 I = 103,435 mm 4 k= 0.50 L = 220 mm N cr = ((PI()^2)*70000*103435)/((0.5^2)*(220^2)) = 5,905,816.30 N λ = A eff f o / N cr (6.3.1.2) A= 1,1 2 = 0.22 X = 1/ Φ+ Φ 2 -λ 2 Φ = 0.5(1+ά(λ-λ o )+λ 2 ) X = 0.94 ά = 0.20 Table 6.6 λ o = 0.10 Table 6.6 Φ = 0.54 N b,rd = 0.65*0.94*1140*255/1100 = 161.47 kn > 120.2 kn Page 8of 11

F b,rd = k 1 α b f u d t/g M2 d o = 13 mm F b,rd = k 1 α b f u d t/g M2 d o = 13 mm Calculation sheet Bearing in spigot Project : Element : Apollo beams - Spigot connection Aluminium Spigot Capacity Document No : 001 Checked : anw Date: Jul 13 Alan white design Bolts are M12 grade 8.8 e 1 = e 2 = k 1 = 6.92 >2.5 therefore k 1 = 2.5 t= 38.1 mm d= 12 mm f u = 295 N/mm 2 f ub = 800 N/mm 2 g M2 = 1.25 α b = 1.03 >1 Therefore, α b = 1.00 F b,rd = (2.5*1.00*295*12*38.1)/1250 = 269.75 kn > 120.20 kn ok Bearing in boom Bolts are M12 grade 8.8 F b,rd = (2.5*1.00*295*12*4.4)/1250 = 31.15 kn e 1 = e 2 = k 1 = 6.92 >2.5 therefore k 1 = 2.5 t= 4.4 mm d= 12 mm f u = 295 N/mm 2 f ub = 800 N/mm 2 g M2 = 1.25 α b = 1.03 >1 Therefore, α b = 1.00 Load transferred via 2No Bolts with 2No holes leading to 4No Bearing surfaces Total Bearing capacity= 4*31.15 F b,rd = 124.60 kn > 120.20 kn ok Page 9of 11

Results Project : Apollo beams - Spigot connection Element : Summary Document No : 001 Checked : anw Date: Jul 13 Alan white design Action Formula Ultimate Calculated Factor Steel Spigot Capacity Moment M Rd,x 1.60 1.04 0.65 Shear V Rd 53.29 48.74 0.92 Tension N u,rd 116.60 91.69 0.79 Compression N b,rd 152.85 120.20 0.79 Bearing - Spigot F b,rd 198.76 120.20 0.61 Bearing - Boom F b,rd 124.60 120.20 0.97 Alu Spigot Capacity Moment M Rd,x 2.14 1.04 0.49 Shear V Rd 122.06 48.74 0.40 Tension N u,rd 136.79 91.69 0.68 Compression N b,rd 161.47 120.20 0.75 Bearing - Spigot F b,rd 269.75 120.20 0.45 Bearing - Boom F b,rd 124.60 120.20 0.97 Page 10of 11

Project : Apollo beams - Spigot connection Element : Summary Document No : 001 Checked : anw Date: Jul 13 Alan white design Summary The required capacities for the three different beams listed below were extracted from their design calculations and the capacities of spigots made from two different materials were compared. The beams were Apollo alloy ladder beam Apollo alloy lattice beam Apollo alloy X-beam The spigots that were checked were: Steel Aluminium 38.1mm diameter 4.06mm seamless tube to Grade S355. 38.1 diameter solid bar made from 6082T6 aluminium alloy The calculations showed that both of these spigots have the required capacities and are suitable for use in these beams. Page 11of 11