SMALL STARTS PROJECT DESCRIPTION TEMPLATE

Similar documents
GIS Analysis of Crenshaw/LAX Line

15.0 Operations and Maintenance Cost Calculations

Regional Performance Measures

MINNESOTA SIDE Draft TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

2014 UTP Public Meeting July 18, 2013

Hillsborough County MPO Transit Study. Technical Team August 23, 2007

Regional Performance Measures

SECTION DESCRIPTION PAGE I. BUDGET INTRODUCTION... 1 II. FISCAL YEAR 2017 BUDGET ANALYSIS... 2 III. PROPOSED OPERATING BUDGET... 3

Appendixx C Travel Demand Model Development and Forecasting Lubbock Outer Route Study June 2014

RESOLUTION NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE CORKSCREW FARMS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT:

BROOKINGS May

California Urban Infill Trip Generation Study. Jim Daisa, P.E.

Study Overview. the nassau hub study. The Nassau Hub

Arlington County, Virginia

FY2011 Capital Budget Reprogramming

3.0 ANALYSIS OF FUTURE TRANSPORTATION NEEDS

ADDRESSING TITLE VI AND ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE IN LONG-RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLANS

Adopted Budget Presented for Board Approval June 21, 2017

2014 Certification Review Regional Data & Modeling

Westside Extension Los Angeles, California

Speakers: Jeff Price, Federal Transit Administration Linda Young, Center for Neighborhood Technology Sofia Becker, Center for Neighborhood Technology

Frequently Asked Questions

SECTION DESCRIPTION PAGE I. BUDGET INTRODUCTION... 1 II. FISCAL YEAR 2017 BUDGET ANALYSIS... 2 III. FINAL OPERATING BUDGET... 3

HORIZON 2030: Land Use & Transportation November 2005

Kenneth Shelton, Assistant Superintendent, Business Services Los Angeles County Office of Education 9300 Imperial Highway Downey, CA 90242

METRO. Metro Funding. Associated Master Plan: Comprehensive Master Transportation Plan (MTP) for Arlington METRO CIP

Adopted Budget Presented for Board Approval June 15, 2016

PW 001 SNOW REMOVAL AND SANDING FOR ROADWAYS AND SIDEWALKS October 6, 2014 (#223-14) Original October 19, 2015; October 15, 2018 Public Works

Environmental Justice Analysis

STRATEGIC BUSINESS PLAN QUARTERLY KPI REPORT FOR: FISCAL YEAR 2016 THROUGH OCTOBER (JULY 2015 THROUGH OCTOBER 2015)

STRATEGIC BUSINESS PLAN QUARTERLY KPI REPORT FOR: FISCAL YEAR 2016 THROUGH DECEMBER (JULY 2015 THROUGH DECEMBER 2015)

Assessing spatial distribution and variability of destinations in inner-city Sydney from travel diary and smartphone location data

PENINSULA. POWERS BOARD 1250 San

The Use of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) by Local Governments. Giving municipal decision-makers the power to make better decisions

StanCOG Transportation Model Program. General Summary

SECTION DESCRIPTION PAGE I. BUDGET INTRODUCTION... 1 II. FISCAL YEAR 2017 BUDGET ANALYSIS... 2 III. PROPOSED OPERATING BUDGET... 4

Standardized Cost Category Spreadsheets

OREGON POPULATION FORECAST PROGRAM

EXPENDITURE SAMPLES AND FUNDS REQUEST FORM

Madison City Schools Budget. FY 2018 Proposed Budget 2nd Public Hearing August 31,

The WVDOT Planning Process

Department Mission: Mandated Services: Department Overview:

WOODRUFF ROAD CORRIDOR ORIGIN-DESTINATION ANALYSIS

Technical Memorandum #2 Future Conditions

SECTION DESCRIPTION PAGE I. BUDGET INTRODUCTION... 1 II. FISCAL YEAR 2016 BUDGET ANALYSIS... 2 III. FINAL OPERATING BUDGET FUND

DEVELOPING DECISION SUPPORT TOOLS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN SAFETY STRATEGIES

Fiscal Year Budget

WICHITA FALLS METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

GASB 34. Basic Financial Statements M D & A

MPOs SB 375 LAFCOs SCAG Practices/Experiences And Future Collaborations with LAFCOs

TRANSIT FORECASTING UNCERTAINTY & ACCURACY DAVID SCHMITT, AICP WITH VERY SPECIAL THANKS TO HONGBO CHI

Typical information required from the data collection can be grouped into four categories, enumerated as below.

Environmental Analysis, Chapter 4 Consequences, and Mitigation

Beginning to Enjoy the Outside View A Glance at Transit Forecasting Uncertainty & Accuracy Using the Transit Forecasting Accuracy Database

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council

City of Eagleville Budget Presentation Fiscal Year 2018

APPLICATION TO AMEND THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP (FLUM) SMALL SCALE

Data Collection. Lecture Notes in Transportation Systems Engineering. Prof. Tom V. Mathew. 1 Overview 1

Regional Growth Strategy Work Session Growth Management Policy Board

Coordinated Transit and Land Use Planning in the Region of Waterloo

East Bay BRT. Planning for Bus Rapid Transit

BROOMFIELD COLORADO...

HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO. Office of the Board of Education Norwood City Schooll District January, To the County Auditor:

Market Street PDP. Nassau County, Florida. Transportation Impact Analysis. VHB/Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. Nassau County Growth Management

Public Open House Meeting Thursday, February 22, Broken Arrow to Tulsa Mass Transit Feasibility Study

Traffic Impact Study

State of Wisconsin Higher Educational Aids Board

Forecasts for the Reston/Dulles Rail Corridor and Route 28 Corridor 2010 to 2050

STAFF REPORT. MEETING DATE: July 3, 2008 AGENDA ITEM: 7

Public Disclosure Copy. Implementation Status & Results Report CN Yunnan Honghe Prefecture Diannan Center Urban Transport (P101525)

Uses of Travel Demand Models Beyond the MTP. Janie Temple Transportation Planning and Programming Division

12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Office of Research and Special Programs (RSPA) U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C.

Cipra D. Revised Submittal 1

Forecasts from the Strategy Planning Model

Section 2. Indiana Geographic Information Council: Strategic Plan

Mapping Accessibility Over Time

Snow and Ice Control POLICY NO. P-01/2015. CITY OF AIRDRIE Snow and Ice Control Policy

Integrating Origin and Destination (OD) Study into GIS in Support of LIRR Services and Network Improvements

Finance Department. Denton City Council Department Presentation

San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Annual Report. Indirect Source Review Program

PART A Project summary

Analyzing the Market Share of Commuter Rail Stations using LEHD Data

Proposed Scope of Work Village of Farmingdale Downtown Farmingdale BOA Step 2 BOA Nomination Study / Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement

Regional Growth Strategy Regional TOD Advisory Committee

HOW TO USE THE SBDC FINANCIAL TEMPLATE

Simplified Trips-on-Project Software (STOPS): Strategies for Successful Application

The School District of Sarasota County, FL. Fund Types Governmental Balance Sheet Account

River North Multi-Modal Transit Analysis

Implementation Status & Results Belize Municipal Development (P111928)

APPENDIX I: Traffic Forecasting Model and Assumptions

Appendix BAL Baltimore, Maryland 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

Department Mission: Mandated Services: Department Overview: Successes and Challenges:

The purpose of this report is to recommend a Geographic Information System (GIS) Strategy for the Town of Richmond Hill.

FY ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT

SUBJECT: CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 2013 LOCAL DEVELOPMENT REPORT, RESOLUTION NO

I. M. Schoeman North West University, South Africa. Abstract

Expanding the GSATS Model Area into

Land Use Advisory Committee. Updating the Transit Market Areas

The World Bank China: Qinghai Xining Urban Transport Project (P127867)

Town of Barnstable. Department of Public Work. Snow and Ice Control Operations Plan

Transcription:

PROJECT NAME: Lead Agency Metropolitan Planning Organization Transit Agency State Department of Transportation Other Relevant Agencies Other Relevant Agencies Other Relevant Agencies Project Definition SMALL STARTS PROJECT DESCRIPTION TEMPLATE Albuquerque Rapid Transit Project Participating Agencies City of Albuquerque, Transit Department Contact Person Bruce Rizzieri 100 1st Street SW, Albuquerque, NM 87102 Telephone Number 505-724-3181 Number brizzieri@cabq.gov Mid Region Council of Governments Contact Person Dewey Cave 809 Copper Avenue NW, Albuquerque, NM 87102 Telephone Number 505-724-3024 Number dcave@mrcog-nm.gov City of Albuquerque, Transit Department Contact Person Bruce Rizzieri 100 1st Street SW, Albuquerque, NM 87102 Telephone Number 505-724-3181 Number brizzieri@cabq.gov Contact Person Telephone Number Number Contact Person Telephone Number Number Contact Person Telephone Number Number Contact Person Telephone Number Number SMALL STARTS PROJECT DESCRIPTION TEMPLATE (Page 2) Length (miles) Mode/Technology Number of Stations List each station separately, including the number of park and ride spaces at each and whether structured or surface parking 8.75 Bus Rapid Transit 20 Coors Boulevard Old Coors Drive Atrisco Drive New York Avenue Rio Grande Boulevard 15th Street Gold Avenue and 6th Street Alvarado Transportation Center 1st Street and Central Avenue Copper Avenue and 2nd Street Cooper Avenue and 6th Street

List each station with major transfer facilities to other modes Walter Street Cedar Street University Boulevard Cornell Drive Bryn Mawr Drive Solano Drive Washington Street San Mateo Boulevard Louisiana Boulevard (98 surface parking spaces) Alvarado Transportation Center Central and Unser Transit Center Uptown Transit Center Type of Alignment by Segment (Number of Miles) Status of Existing Right of Way Number of vehicles/rolling stock Above grade Below grade At grade Exclusive Mixed Traffic Ownership who owns the right of way? Current Use: active freight or passenger service? 18 0 0 8.75 8.15 0.6 Majority of project will be constructed in existing street right of way owned by the City of Albuquerque Active roadway SMALL STARTS PROJECT DESCRIPTION TEMPLATE (Page 3) Project Planning Dates Current Year Opening Year Horizon Exact Horizon Year (e.g., 2035) 2012 demographic data and FY2013 transit data 2017 None Capital Cost Estimate 2014 constant dollars Year of Expenditure $ $ 119,303,378 126,156,088 Levels of Service Headways Opening Year Horizon Year Weekday Peak 7.5 min Weekday Off-peak 7.5 min Weekday Evening 10 min Weekend 10 min (Saturday) / 15 min (Sunday) Hours of Service Opening Year Horizon Year Weekday 5:45 am to 9:30 pm Weekend 6:00 am to 9:00 pm (Saturday) /. 6:30 am to 6:30 pm (Sunday) Type of Model Used for Travel Forecasts FTA Simplified Trips on Projects (STOPS) model Fare Policy Assumptions Used in Travel Forecasts [footnote 1] Fare will be equal to local bus route fare Estimated Number of U.S. Jobs Related to Design, Construction, Operation and Maintenance of the Project 1,034 Project Planning and Project Schedule Development Schedule Insert anticipated or actual date Anticipated NEPA Class of Action Entry into Project Development Receipt of CE Categorical Exclusion (CE) Feb-14 Aug-15

Project Management Project Manager Agency CEO Key Agency Staff: Overall Small Starts Criteria Key Agency Staff: Cost Estimates Key Agency Staff: Environmental Documentation Key Agency Staff: Land Use Assessment Key Agency Staff: Financial Assessment Key Agency Staff: Project Maps Contractors Current Prime Contractor LPA selected LPA included in the financially constrained long range plan Anticipated SSGA/Construction Grant Award Construction Duration (enter start and end dates) Initiation of Revenue Service Apr-11 Apr-11 May-16 Feb 16 to Sep 17 Sep-17 Dayna Crawford 505-724-3184 dayna@cabq.gov Bruce Rizzieri 505-724-3181 brizzieri@cabq.gov Dayna Crawford 505-724-3184 dayna@cabq.gov [1] Please provide a narrative sumarizing fare policy assumptions used for all regional transit services. Include this summary as an attachment. Key Agency Staff: Ridership Forecasts SMALL STARTS PROJECT DESCRIPTION TEMPLATE (Page 4) Andrew de Garmo 505-724-3109 adegarmo@cabq.gov Chris Payton 505-764-8910 cpayton@cabq.gov Lawrence Kline 505-724-3130 lkline@cabq.gov Lawrence Kline 505-724-3130 lkline@cabq.gov Chris Payton 505-764-8910 cpayton@cabq.gov Lawrence Kline 505-724-3130 lkline@cabq.gov Peter Brakenhoff, P.E. 2155 Louisiana Blvd. Albuquerque NM 87110 505--830-5433

Prime Contractor: Project Manager Contractor Responsible for Travel Forecasts Contractor Responsible for Capital Cost Estimates peter.brakenhoff@hdrinc.com Ed Potthoff, P.E. 2155 Louisiana Blvd. Albuquerque NM 87110 505-830-5401 edward.potthoff@hdrinc.com Vijay Mahal 1801 Main Street, Houston, TX 77002 713-335-1911 vijay.mahal@hdrinc.com Ed Potthoff, P.E. 2155 Louisiana Blvd. Albuquerque NM 87110 505-830-5401 edward.potthoff@hdrinc.com

PROJECT NAME: SMALL STARTS TRAVEL FORECASTS TEMPLATE Albuquerque Rapid Transit Project Trips on the Project Annual linked trips (daily trips * annualization factor) Daily linked trips Annualization Line Transit market Trips made by: (2012 demographic Horizon (None) factor (2012 demographic 1a Modeled trips: homebased work (HBW) Transit dependents 1,599 479,700 Non-transit dependents 4,803 1,440,900 300 1b 2a Modeled trips: all other Non-transit dependents 6,230 1,869,000 300 2b trip purposes Transit dependents 3,104 931,200 3a Special market 1 Non-transit dependents 473 132,440 280 3b (specify) Transit dependents 277 77,560 4a Special market 2 Non-transit dependents 0 4b (specify) Transit dependents 0 5a Special market 3 Non-transit dependents 0 5b (specify) Transit dependents 0 6a Special market 4 Non-transit dependents 0 6b (specify) Transit dependents 0 7a Subtotal (lines 1 Non-transit dependents 3,442,340 7b through 6) Transit dependents 1,488,460 Total annual linked trips with special markets 8a 4,930,800 (lines 7a through 7b) Total daily linked trips without special markets 8b 15,736 - (lines 1a through 2b) Vehicle-Miles of Travel () Annual (for automobile, calculation is daily * annualization change Daily Annualization factor; (Build minus No-build ) Current Year (2012 Horizon (None) Current Year (2012 Horizon (None) Current Year Line Mode / Technology No-build Build No-build Build factor No-build Build No-build Build (2012 Horizon (None) 9 Automobile 0-5,880 300 0-1,764,000-1,764,000 10 Diesel bus 0 11 Hybrid bus 0 12 CNG bus 0 13 Electric bus 0 14 Heavy rail [1] 0 15 Light rail / streetcar [1] 0 16 Commuter rail (new diesel locomotive or DMU) [1] 0 17 Commuter rail (used diesel locomotive) [1] 0 18 Commuter rail (electric or EMU) [1] 0 [1] For rail transit modes, report in terms of total rail passenger car mileage, not train mileage. (As an illustration of the difference, the rail passenger car mileage for a commuter rail or heavy rail train with six passenger cars would be six times the train mileage.) Horizon (None) Brief description of the process used to develop travel forecasts (e.g., local model, FTA simplified national model, incremental data-driven method, direct demand model) FTA Simplified Trips on Projects (STOPS) model FTA Simplified Trips on Projects (STOPS) model Incremental data-driven method

PROJECT NAME: SMALL STARTS MOBILITY AND COST-EFFECTIVENESS TEMPLATE Albuquerque Rapid Transit Project Mobility Improvements Values Line Item 12 demographic data and FY Horizon (None) Source/Calculation 1 Annual linked trips on the project with doubled weight for trips by transit-dependent persons 6,419,260 Travel Forecasts Template, Line 7a + 2 * Line 7b If a 10- or 20-year horizon is used: 50 percent * Line 1 current 2 Value used in rating 6,419,260 year value + 50 percent * Line 1 horizon year value If no horizon year is used: Line 1 current year value Cost Effectiveness Values Source/Calculation Line Item 12 demographic data and FY Horizon (None) 3 Annualized Federal share of project capital cost (constant 2014 dollars) $4,832,737 Source: SCC Build Annualized worksheets 4 Annual linked trips on the project 4,930,800 Travel Forecasts Template, Line 8a 5 Annualized Federal share of the project per annual linked trip on the project $0.98 Line 3 / Line 4 If a 10- or 20-year horizon is used: 50 percent * Line 5 current 6 Value used in rating $0.98 year value + 50 percent * Line 5 horizon year value If no horizon year is used: Line 5 current year value

PROJECT NAME: SMALL STARTS LAND USE TEMPLATE (QUANTITATIVE DATA) Albuquerque Rapid Transit Project Population, Employment and Housing Metropolitan Area, CBD, and Corridor Geographic Area Item Current Year (2012 demographic data Horizon (None) Metropolitan Area Total Population 879,401 Total Employment 388,981 Growth (%) Central Business District [see footnote 1] Total Employment Employment Percent of Metropolitan Area 20,249 5.2% CBD Land Area (sq. mi.) Employment Density (e.g., jobs per sq. mi.) 0.5 40,498.0 Corridor Total Population 74,024 Total Employment 81,157 Population Percent of Metropolitan Area 8% Employment Percent of Metropolitan Area 21% Corridor Land Area (sq. mi.) 16.4 Population Density (persons per sq. mi.) 4,513.7 Employment Density (jobs per sq. mi.) 4,948.6 Total - All Counties in which Project Stations are Located 287,318 Housing Units - Legally Binding Affordability Restricted 10,214 Number of Counties 1 Total - All Station Areas (1/2-mile radius) [See footnote 2] 20,932 Housing Units - Legally Binding Affordability Restricted 1,692 Population 43,559 Employment at New Project Stations Employment at Existing Stations Along the Line [see footnote 3] 54,420 Land Area (square miles) Housing Unit Density (units per sq. mi.) - All Types Population Density (persons per sq. mi.) 8.8 2,378.6 4,949.9 Employment Density (persons per sq. mi.) 6,184.1 Station-Area Share of Legally Binding Affordability Restricted Housing Units 8% Comparison of Proportions of Housing Units that are Legally Binding Affordability Restricted Proportion in All Station Areas 8% Proportion in All Counties in which Project Stations are Located 4% Ratio, Proportion in All Station Areas to Proportion in All Counties in which Project Stations are Located 2.27 Housing Totals for Each County in which Project Stations are Located Current Year County 1 County : [See footnote 4] 287,318 Housing Units - Legally Binding Affordability Restricted 10,214 BERNALLIO County 2 Housing Units - Legally Binding Affordability Restricted County 3 Housing Units - Legally Binding Affordability Restricted County : County :

County 4 Housing Units - Legally Binding Affordability Restricted County 5 Housing Units - Legally Binding Affordability Restricted County : County : SMALL STARTS LAND USE TEMPLATE (QUANTITATIVE DATA) page 2 Housing, Population and Employment for Each Station Area That is Part of the Proposed Project Current Year Horizon Growth (%) Station Area 1 [See footnote 5] Population Employment Land Area (square miles) Housing Unit Density (units per sq. mi.) - All Types Population Density (persons per sq. mi.) Employment Density (persons per sq. mi.) Station : 0.7 1,894 5,394 3,269 1,326 3,776 2,288 COORS Station Area 2 Station : OLD COORS 1,367 Population 3,934 Employment 488 Land Area (square miles) 0.7 Housing Unit Density (units per sq. mi.) - All Types 1,953 Population Density (persons per sq. mi.) 5,620 Employment Density (persons per sq. mi.) 697 Station Area 3 Station : ATRISCO 962 Population 2,596 Employment 496 Land Area (square miles) 0.7 Housing Unit Density (units per sq. mi.) - All Types 1,374 Population Density (persons per sq. mi.) 3,709 Employment Density (persons per sq. mi.) 709 Station Area 4 Station : OLD TOWN (NEW YORK AND RIO GRANDE) Population Employment 923 1,764 2,345 Land Area (square miles) Housing Unit Density (units per sq. mi.) - All Types Population Density (persons per sq. mi.) Employment Density (persons per sq. mi.) 1.0 966 1,847 2,456 Station Area 5 Station : 15TH STREET 1,678 Population 2,668 Employment 1,220 Land Area (square miles) 0.6 Housing Unit Density (units per sq. mi.) - All Types 2,985 Population Density (persons per sq. mi.) 4,746 Employment Density (persons per sq. mi.) 2,170 Station Area 6 Station : CBD (DOWNTOWN AND WALTER) 3,054 Population 6,112 Employment 24,322 Land Area (square miles) 1.3

Housing Unit Density (units per sq. mi.) - All Types 2,350 Population Density (persons per sq. mi.) 4,703 Employment Density (persons per sq. mi.) 18,716 Station Area 7 Station : UNM (CEDAR, UNIVERSITY AND CORNELL) 3,944 Population Employment 7,854 13,659 Land Area (square miles) Housing Unit Density (units per sq. mi.) - All Types Population Density (persons per sq. mi.) Employment Density (persons per sq. mi.) 1.3 3,143 6,258 10,884 SMALL STARTS LAND USE TEMPLATE (QUANTITATIVE DATA) page 3 Current Year Horizon Growth (%) Station Area 8 Station : NOB HILL (BRYN MAWR and SOLANO) 3,150 Population 5,280 Employment 4,968 Land Area (square miles) 1.1 Housing Unit Density (units per sq. mi.) - All Types 2,933 Population Density (persons per sq. mi.) 4,916 Employment Density (persons per sq. mi.) 4,626 Station Area 9 Station : SAN MATEO (WASHINGTON and SAN MATEO) Population Employment 2,309 5,423 2,059 Land Area (square miles) Housing Unit Density (units per sq. mi.) - All Types Population Density (persons per sq. mi.) Employment Density (persons per sq. mi.) 0.8 2,939 6,905 2,622 Station Area 10 Station : LOUISIANA 2,309 Population 5,423 Employment 2,055 Land Area (square miles) 0.8 Housing Unit Density (units per sq. mi.) - All Types 2,886 Population Density (persons per sq. mi.) 6,779 Employment Density (persons per sq. mi.) 2,569 SMALL STARTS LAND USE TEMPLATE (QUANTITATIVE DATA) page 4 Current Year Horizon Growth (%) [1] Optionally, employment for the largest activity center(s) served by the project may be reported. [2] See Appendix A of the Reporting Instructions for a sample methodology for estimating station area population, households, and employment. [3] This information should be entered only for projects that are extensions to existing lines. Provide the total employment served within a 1/2- mile radius of the existing stations along the line on which a no-transfer ride from the proposed project's stations can be reached. [4] Countywide housing unit totals are available from the U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey website (http://www.census.gov/acs/). [5] Reporting of data by individual station area is required.

PROJECT NAME: SMALL STARTS ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS TEMPLATE Albuquerque Rapid Transit Project Line Item 1 Regional air quality attainment status, carbon monoxide (CO) 2 Regional air quality attainment status, nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ) 3 Regional air quality attainment status, ozone (O 3 ) (2008 8-hour standard) 4 Regional air quality attainment status, particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) (2006 standard) Attainment Status and Summary Results Values Maintenance Attainment Attainment Current Year (2012 demographic data and Source/Calculation Horizon (None) 5 6 environmental benefits Annualized Federal share of project $474,788 $4,832,737 Sum of lines 19, 30, 41, 52, 63, 74, 85 and 96 for current and applicable (if any) horizon Mobility and Cost Effectiveness Template, Line 3 7 Ratio of environmental benefits to annualized Federal share of project 9.8% Line 5 / Line 6 If a 10- or 20-year horizon is being used: 50 percent * Line 7 current year value + 50 8 Value used in rating 9.8% percent * Line 7 horizon year value If no horizon year is being used: Line 7 current year value Attainment Source: EPA Green Book VALUE OF BENEFITS BY FACTOR (kg) / (kg) Line Mode ($ / kg) (kg) / (kg) ($ / kg) / (kg) ($ / kg) 9 Automobile 1,764,000 0.01677 29,582.28 $0.10 $2,958.23 0.01146 $0.10 0.01026 $0.10 10 Diesel Bus 0 0.00583 0.00 $0.10 $0.00 0.00326 $0.10 0.00289 $0.10 11 Hybrid Bus 0 0.00583 0.00 $0.10 $0.00 0.00326 $0.10 0.00289 $0.10 12 CNG Bus 0 0.03962 0.00 $0.10 $0.00 0.02030 $0.10 0.01716 $0.10 13 Electric Bus 0 0.00645 0.00 $0.10 $0.00 0.00539 $0.10 0.00504 $0.10 14 Heavy Rail 0 0.00706 0.00 $0.10 $0.00 0.00685 $0.10 0.00673 $0.10 15 Light Rail / Streetcar 0 0.01051 0.00 $0.10 $0.00 0.01020 $0.10 0.01001 $0.10 16 Commuter Rail - New diesel locomotive or DMU 0 0.01680 0.00 $0.10 $0.00 0.01680 $0.10 0.01680 $0.10 17 Commuter Rail - Used diesel locomotive 0 0.01680 0.00 $0.10 $0.00 0.01680 $0.10 0.01680 $0.10 (kg) 18 Commuter Rail - Electric or EMU 0 0.01281 0.00 $0.10 $0.00 0.01243 $0.10 0.01219 $0.10 19 TOTAL CHANGE 1,764,000 29,582.28 $2,958.23 (kg) / Air Quality: Carbon Monoxide (CO) Current Year Horizon - 10 Years Horizon - 20 Years (kg) SMALL STARTS ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS TEMPLATE (page 2) Line Mode ($ / kg) (kg) / (kg) ($ / kg) / (kg) ($ / kg) 20 Automobile 1,764,000 0.00091 1,605.24 $12.96 $20,803.91 0.00028 $15.66 0.00020 $16.20 21 Diesel Bus 0 0.00867 0.00 $12.96 $0.00 0.00208 $15.66 0.00114 $16.20 22 Hybrid Bus 0 0.00867 0.00 $12.96 $0.00 0.00208 $15.66 0.00114 $16.20 23 CNG Bus 0 0.00384 0.00 $12.96 $0.00 0.00341 $15.66 0.00335 $16.20 (kg) Air Quality: Mono-Nitrogen Oxides (NO x ) Current Year Horizon - 10 Years Horizon - 20 Years

24 Electric Bus 0 0.00583 0.00 $18.36 $0.00 0.00439 $22.95 0.00398 $23.76 25 Heavy Rail 0 0.00638 0.00 $18.36 $0.00 0.00558 $22.95 0.00532 $23.76 26 Light Rail / Streetcar 0 0.00950 0.00 $18.36 $0.00 0.00831 $22.95 0.00791 $23.76 27 Commuter Rail - New diesel locomotive or DMU 0 0.01320 0.00 $12.96 $0.00 0.01320 $15.66 0.01320 $16.20 28 Commuter Rail - Used diesel locomotive 0 0.09300 0.00 $12.96 $0.00 0.04300 $15.66 0.02090 $16.20 29 Commuter Rail - Electric or EMU 0 0.01157 0.00 $18.36 $0.00 0.01012 $22.95 0.00964 $23.76 30 TOTAL CHANGE 1,764,000 1,605.24 $20,803.91 (kg) / (kg) Line Mode ($ / kg) (kg) / (kg) ($ / kg) / (kg) ($ / kg) 31 Automobile 1,764,000 0.00060 1,058.40 $3.02 $3,196.37 0.00027 $3.75 0.00021 $3.89 (kg) 32 Diesel Bus 0 0.00073 0.00 $3.02 $0.00 0.00024 $3.75 0.00016 $3.89 33 Hybrid Bus 0 0.00073 0.00 $3.02 $0.00 0.00024 $3.75 0.00016 $3.89 34 CNG Bus 0 0.00146 0.00 $3.02 $0.00 0.00115 $3.75 0.00111 $3.89 35 Electric Bus 0 0.00012 0.00 $3.02 $0.00 0.00010 $3.75 0.00010 $3.89 36 Heavy Rail 0 0.00013 0.00 $3.02 $0.00 0.00013 $3.75 0.00013 $3.89 37 Light Rail / Streetcar 0 0.00019 0.00 $3.02 $0.00 0.00019 $3.75 0.00020 $3.89 38 Commuter Rail - New diesel locomotive or DMU 0 0.00055 0.00 $3.02 $0.00 0.00055 $3.75 0.00055 $3.89 39 Commuter Rail - Used diesel locomotive 0 0.00436 0.00 $3.02 $0.00 0.00126 $3.75 0.00044 $3.89 40 Commuter Rail - Electric or EMU 0 0.00024 0.00 $3.02 $0.00 0.00023 $3.75 0.00024 $3.89 41 TOTAL CHANGE 1,764,000 1,058.40 $3,196.37 (kg) / Air Quality: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) Current Year Horizon - 10 Years Horizon - 20 Years Current Year (kg) SMALL STARTS ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS TEMPLATE (page 3) Air Quality: Particulate Matter (PM 2.5 ) Horizon - 10 Years Line Mode ($ / kg) (kg) / (kg) ($ / kg) / (kg) ($ / kg) 42 Automobile 1,764,000 0.000010 17.64 $680.40 $12,002.26 0.000010 $861.30 0.000010 $896.40 (kg) 43 Diesel Bus 0 0.000480 0.00 $680.40 $0.00 0.000090 $861.30 0.000030 $896.40 44 Hybrid Bus 0 0.000480 0.00 $680.40 $0.00 0.000090 $861.30 0.000030 $896.40 45 CNG Bus 0 0.000010 0.00 $680.40 $0.00 0.000010 $861.30 0.000010 $896.40 46 Electric Bus 0 0.000378 0.00 $561.60 $0.00 0.000313 $688.50 0.000299 $712.80 47 Heavy Rail 0 0.000413 0.00 $561.60 $0.00 0.000398 $688.50 0.000399 $712.80 48 Light Rail / Streetcar 0 0.000615 0.00 $561.60 $0.00 0.000593 $688.50 0.000593 $712.80 49 Commuter Rail - New diesel locomotive or DMU 0 0.000190 0.00 $680.40 $0.00 0.000190 $861.30 0.000190 $896.40 50 Commuter Rail - Used diesel locomotive 0 0.004600 0.00 $680.40 $0.00 0.001330 $861.30 0.000470 $896.40 51 Commuter Rail - Electric or EMU 0 0.000750 0.00 $561.60 $0.00 0.000722 $688.50 0.000723 $712.80 52 TOTAL CHANGE 1,764,000 17.64 $12,002.26 Greenhouse Gases (Carbon Dioxide Equivalent [CO 2 e]) Horizon - 20 Years

(ton) / (tons) Line Mode ($ / ton) (ton) / (tons) ($ / ton) (ton) / (tons) ($ / ton) 53 Automobile 1,764,000 0.000532 938.45 $38.00 $35,661.02 0.000434 $38.00 0.000397 $38.00 54 Diesel Bus 0 0.003319 0.00 $38.00 $0.00 0.002854 $38.00 0.002721 $38.00 55 Hybrid Bus 0 0.002655 0.00 $38.00 $0.00 0.002283 $38.00 0.002177 $38.00 56 CNG Bus 0 0.002935 0.00 $38.00 $0.00 0.002524 $38.00 0.002406 $38.00 57 Electric Bus 0 0.002934 0.00 $38.00 $0.00 0.002441 $38.00 0.002303 $38.00 58 Heavy Rail 0 0.003211 0.00 $38.00 $0.00 0.003106 $38.00 0.003073 $38.00 59 Light Rail / Streetcar 0 0.004779 0.00 $38.00 $0.00 0.004623 $38.00 0.004574 $38.00 60 Commuter Rail - New diesel locomotive or DMU 0 0.007970 0.00 $38.00 $0.00 0.007970 $38.00 0.007970 $38.00 61 Commuter Rail - Used diesel locomotive 0 0.007970 0.00 $38.00 $0.00 0.007970 $38.00 0.007970 $38.00 62 Commuter Rail - Electric or EMU 0 0.005821 0.00 $38.00 $0.00 0.005632 $38.00 0.005572 $38.00 63 TOTAL CHANGE 1,764,000 938.45 $35,661.02 Energy Use (million Btu) / Energy Use (million Btu) ($ / million Btu) Line Mode (million Btu) Btu) (million Btu) Btu) 64 Automobile 1,764,000 0.007559 13,334.08 $1.72 $22,934.61 0.006167 $1.72 0.005633 $1.72 Energy Use (million Btu) / Energy Use ($ / million Energy Use (million Btu) / Energy Use ($ / million 65 Diesel Bus 0 0.041436 0.00 $1.56 $0.00 0.035635 $1.56 0.033978 $1.56 66 Hybrid Bus 0 0.033149 0.00 $1.56 $0.00 0.028508 $1.56 0.027182 $1.56 67 CNG Bus 68 Electric Bus 69 Heavy Rail 70 Light Rail / Streetcar 71 Commuter Rail - New diesel locomotive or DMU 0 0.096138 0.00 $1.56 $0.00 0.096138 $1.56 0.096138 $1.56 72 Commuter Rail - Used diesel locomotive 0 0.096138 0.00 $1.56 $0.00 0.096138 $1.56 0.096138 $1.56 73 Commuter Rail - Electric or EMU 74 TOTAL CHANGE 1,764,000 13,334.08 $22,934.61 Fatalities / Current Year Horizon - 10 Years Horizon - 20 Years SMALL STARTS ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS TEMPLATE (page 4) Energy Use (British Thermal Units [Btu]) Current Year Horizon - 10 Years Horizon - 20 Years Safety: Fatalities Current Year Horizon - 10 Years Horizon - 20 Years Line Mode Fatality ($ / fatality) Fatality ($ / fatality) Fatality ($ / fatality) 75 Automobile 1,764,000 0.000000013 0.02 $9,100,000 $208,681.20 0.000000013 $9,100,000 0.000000013 $9,100,000 76 Diesel Bus 0 0.000000004 0.00 $9,100,000 $0.00 0.000000004 $9,100,000 0.000000004 $9,100,000 77 Hybrid Bus 0 0.000000004 0.00 $9,100,000 $0.00 0.000000004 $9,100,000 0.000000004 $9,100,000 78 CNG Bus 0 0.000000004 0.00 $9,100,000 $0.00 0.000000004 $9,100,000 0.000000004 $9,100,000 79 Electric Bus 0 0.000000004 0.00 $9,100,000 $0.00 0.000000004 $9,100,000 0.000000004 $9,100,000 Fatalities / Fatalities /

80 Heavy Rail 0 0.000000007 0.00 $9,100,000 $0.00 0.000000007 $9,100,000 0.000000007 $9,100,000 81 Light Rail / Streetcar 0 0.000000009 0.00 $9,100,000 $0.00 0.000000009 $9,100,000 0.000000009 $9,100,000 82 Commuter Rail - New diesel locomotive or DMU 0 0.000000012 0.00 $9,100,000 $0.00 0.000000012 $9,100,000 0.000000012 $9,100,000 83 Commuter Rail - Used diesel locomotive 0 0.000000012 0.00 $9,100,000 $0.00 0.000000012 $9,100,000 0.000000012 $9,100,000 84 Commuter Rail - Electric or EMU 0 0.000000012 0.00 $9,100,000 $0.00 0.000000012 $9,100,000 0.000000012 $9,100,000 85 TOTAL CHANGE 1,764,000 0.02 $208,681.20 Injuries / Line Mode Injury ($ / injury) Injury ($ / injury) Injury ($ / injury) 86 Automobile 1,764,000 0.000000195 0.34 $490,000 $168,550.20 0.000000195 $490,000 0.000000195 $490,000 87 Diesel Bus 0 0.000001824 0.00 $490,000 $0.00 0.000001824 $490,000 0.000001824 $490,000 88 Hybrid Bus 0 0.000001824 0.00 $490,000 $0.00 0.000001824 $490,000 0.000001824 $490,000 89 CNG Bus 0 0.000001824 0.00 $490,000 $0.00 0.000001824 $490,000 0.000001824 $490,000 90 Electric Bus 0 0.000001458 0.00 $490,000 $0.00 0.000001458 $490,000 0.000001458 $490,000 91 Heavy Rail 0 0.000000155 0.00 $490,000 $0.00 0.000000155 $490,000 0.000000155 $490,000 92 Light Rail / Streetcar 0 0.000001696 0.00 $490,000 $0.00 0.000001696 $490,000 0.000001696 $490,000 93 Commuter Rail - New diesel locomotive or DMU 0 0.000001746 0.00 $490,000 $0.00 0.000001746 $490,000 0.000001746 $490,000 94 Commuter Rail - Used diesel locomotive 0 0.000001746 0.00 $490,000 $0.00 0.000001746 $490,000 0.000001746 $490,000 95 Commuter Rail - Electric or EMU 0 0.000001746 0.00 $490,000 $0.00 0.000001746 $490,000 0.000001746 $490,000 96 TOTAL CHANGE 1,764,000 0.34 $168,550.20 [1] Value will be positive for decreases and negative for increases. SMALL STARTS ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS TEMPLATE (page 5) Safety: Injuries Current Year Horizon - 10 Years Horizon - 20 Years Injuries / Injuries /

PROJECT NAME: SMALL STARTS FINANCE TEMPLATE Albuquerque Rapid Transit Project Total Capital Cost of Project in Constant 2014 Dollars (from the SCC Main Worksheet) $119,303,378 Total Capital Cost of Project in YOE dollars (including finance charges, costs of Project Development and construction): (from SCC Main Worksheet) $126,156,088 Section 5309 Small Starts Funding Anticipated (YOE $): $69,023,577 Section 5309 Small Starts Share of Project Cost: 54.7% Estimated Cost of Project Development (YOE $): $3,923,814 Total Finance Charges Included in Capital Cost (include finance charges that are expected prior to either the revenue operations date or the fulfillment of the Section 5309 Small Starts funding commitment, whichever is later in time): (from SCC Main Worksheet) Other Federal Capital Funding Sources (Non-5309 Small Starts Funds such as FTA Section 5307, Surface Transportation Program (STP), Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ), etc.) 1. FTA Section 5309 (Committed) Formula Funds $1,500,000 1.2% 2. FTA Section 5307 (Committed) Formula Funds $8,139,000 6.5% 3. FTA Section 5307 (Budgeted) Formula Funds $6,000,000 4.8% 4. FTA Section 5339 (Budgeted) Formula Funds $3,204,600 2.5% 5. CMAQ (Committed) Formula Funds $5,118,511 4.1% 6. CMAQ (Budgeted) Formula Funds $7,650,000 6.1% State Capital Funding Sources (Funds provided by State agencies or legislatures such as bonds, dedicated sales tax, annual legislative appropriation, transportation trust funds, etc.) 1. 2. 3. 4. Local Capital Funding Sources (Municipal, City, County, Township, or Regional funding such as bonds, sales tax, legislative appropriation, transportation trust funds, etc.) 1. Match for FTA Section 5309 funds General Funds $420,400 0.3% 2. Bernalillo County General Funds $1,000,000 0.8% 3. GRT Bond Proceeds Bond Proceeds $13,000,000 10.3% 4. GO Bond Proceeds Bond Proceeds $4,100,000 3.2% 5. GO Bond Proceeds: Broadband Bond Proceeds $1,000,000 0.8% 6. Transportation Infrastructure Tax Gross Receipts Tax Funds $6,000,000 4.8% Private Sector/In-kind match/other (Donations of right-of-way, construction of stations or parking, or funding for the project from a non-governmental entity, business, or business assoc.) 1. 2. 3. Type of Funds Type of Funds Type of Funds Type of Funds Dollar Amount (YOE) Dollar Amount (YOE) Dollar Amount (YOE) Dollar Amount (YOE) % of Total Capital Cost % of Total Capital Cost 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% % of Total Capital Cost % of Total Capital Cost 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% TOTAL NON-SECTION 5309 FUNDING (YOE dollars) $57,132,511 QA/QC CHECK: TOTAL CAPITAL COSTS LESS SEC. 5309 FUNDING LESS NON-SEC. 5309 FUNDING (SHOULD EQUAL $0) $0 45.3%

Small Starts Project Financial Commitment Other Federal Sources (Linked from page 1) SMALL STARTS FINANCE TEMPLATE (page 2) Specify Whether New or Existing Funding Source Specify Status of Funds -- Committed, Budgeted, or Planned (See notes below) Identify Supporting Documentation Submitted to Verify Funding Source If a public referendum is needed, provide the anticipated date 1. FTA Section 5309 (Committed) Existing Committed Adopted in prior TIP; existing grant number NM 03 0025 2. FTA Section 5307 (Committed) Existing Committed 3. FTA Section 5307 (Budgeted) Existing Budgeted 4. FTA Section 5339 (Budgeted) Existing Budgeted 5. CMAQ (Committed) Existing Committed 6. CMAQ (Budgeted) Existing Budgeted State Sources (Linked from page 1) 1. 2. 3. 4. Local Sources (Linked from page 1) 1. Match for FTA Section 5309 funds Existing Committed 2. Bernalillo County Existing Planned 3. GRT Bond Proceeds Existing Committed 4. GO Bond Proceeds Existing Committed 5. GO Bond Proceeds: Broadband Existing Committed 6. Transportation Infrastructure Tax Existing Committed Private Sector/In-kind Match/Other (Linked from page 1) 1. 2. 3. See Appendix C TIP Pages CMAQ Sect 5307 (Committed); TIP # TA00350 and TA00054 Will be adopted into TIP by end of 2015; See Appendix C TIP Pages Sect 5307 (Budgeted); TIP # TA00063 Will be adopted into TIP by end of 2015; See Appendix C TIP Pages Sect 5339 (Budgeted); TIP # TA00053, TA00054, and TA00055 See Appendix C TIP Pages CMAQ Sect 5307 (Committed); TIP # TA00350 Will be adopted into TIP by end of 2015; See Appendix C TIP Pages CMAQ (Budgeted); TIP # A301060, TA00084, and TA00351 Adopted in prior TIP; existing grant number NM 03 0025 City Council Resolution R-15-185 Unexpended proceeds from a prior GO Bond. Existing GO Bond legislation allows the City to re-appropriate 10 percent of proceeds for other uses. As such, $4.1 million have been appropriated from the prior GO Bond to the ART Project, with no additional City Council or administrative actions City Council Resolution R-15-181 Reference Notes: The following categories and definitions are applied to funding sources:

Committed: Committed sources are programmed funds that have all the necessary approvals (legislative or referendum) to be used to fund the proposed project without any additional action. These funds have been formally programmed in the MPO s TIP and/or any related local, regional, or state CIP or appropriation. Examples include dedicated or approved tax revenues, state grants that have been approved by all required legislative bodies, cash reserves that have been dedicated to the proposed project, and additional debt capacity that requires no further approvals and has been dedicated by the transit agency to the proposed project. Budgeted: This category is for funds that have been budgeted and/or programmed for use on the proposed project but remain uncommitted, i.e., the funds have not yet received statutory approval. Examples include debt financing in an agency-adopted CIP that has yet to receive final legislative approval, or state grants that have been included in the state budget, but are still awaiting legislative approval. These funds are almost certain to be committed in the near future. Funds will be classified as budgeted where available funding cannot be committed until the Small Starts Grant Agreement (SSGA) is executed, or due to local practices outside of the project sponsor s control (e.g., the project development schedule extends beyond the TIP period). Planned: This category is for funds that are identified and have a reasonable chance of being committed, but are neither committed nor budgeted. Examples include proposed sources that require a scheduled referendum, reasonable requests for state/local grants, and proposed debt financing that has not yet been adopted in the agency s CIP. Innovative Funding Source SMALL STARTS FINANCE TEMPLATE (page 3) Innovative Financing Methods (Unconventional sources of funding which may include TIFIA, State Infrastructure Banks, Public/Private partnerships, Toll Credits, etc.) Anticipated Funding Amount Identify Supporting Documentation Submitted Small Starts Project Annual Operating Cost in the Opening Year (YOE$): Proposed Sources of Operating Funds (Proposed sources of operating funds that are anticipated to support operating expenses of the transit system including the Small Starts project in the opening Summary Information from the Operating Finance Plan $2,370,000 Total Transit System (including Small Starts Project) Annual Operating Cost in the Opening Year (YOE$) Dollar Amount Type of Funding Source Committed, Budgeted, or Planned Farebox Revenues $4,270,000 Special Events $10,000 Operating Revenue Dedicated Contract Revenues $7,330,000 Service Contract Dedicated Advertising $380,000 Operating Revenue Dedicated Local Assistance - General Fund Subsidy $27,290,000 Local Subsidy Annual Local Assistance - Transportation Infrastructure Tax $14,240,000 Local Operating Assistance Annual Total $53,520,000 $53,500,000 Specify Whether New or Existing Funding Source Existing Existing Existing Existing Existing Transit System Operating Characteristics Current Systemwide Characteristics (Can be the same data as reported to the FTA for the National Transit Database) Number/Value Future Transit System with Small Starts Project (Systemwide characteristics at completion of the Small Starts Project) Number/Value Farebox Recovery Percent 10% Number of Buses 157 Number of Rail Vehicles Average Fare $0.34 Average Age of Buses 8.5 Average Age of Rail Vehicles Revenue Miles of Service Provided 7,169,462 Farebox Recovery Percent 8.0% Number of Buses 157 Number of Rail Vehicles Average Fare $0.34 Revenue Miles of Service 7,525,801

Revenue Hours of Service Provided 504,607 Revenue Hours of Service 543,191