CE351 Transportation Systems: Planning and Design

Similar documents
Signalized Intersections

1 h. Page 1 of 12 FINAL EXAM FORMULAS. Stopping Sight Distance. (2 ) N st U Where N=sample size s=standard deviation t=z value for confidence level

CHAPTER 3. CAPACITY OF SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS

Design Priciples of Traffic Signal

Traffic signal design-ii

Signalized Intersection Delay Models

Signalized Intersection Delay Models

CHAPTER 5 DELAY ESTIMATION FOR OVERSATURATED SIGNALIZED APPROACHES

Signalized Intersection Delay Models

Chapter 5 Traffic Flow Characteristics

Course Outline Introduction to Transportation Highway Users and their Performance Geometric Design Pavement Design

Signalized Intersection Delay Models

Impact of Day-to-Day Variability of Peak Hour Volumes on Signalized Intersection Performance

CHAPTER 2. CAPACITY OF TWO-WAY STOP-CONTROLLED INTERSECTIONS

WEBER ROAD RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Single Family Residential Project

CE351 Transportation Systems: Planning and Design

Traffic Signal Timing: Green Time. CVEN 457 & 696 Lecture #18 Gene Hawkins

Approved Corrections and Changes for the Highway Capacity Manual 2000

JEP John E. Jack Pflum, P.E. Consulting Engineering 7541 Hosbrook Road, Cincinnati, OH Telephone:

1.225 Transportation Flow Systems Quiz (December 17, 2001; Duration: 3 hours)

2.2t t 3 =1.2t+0.035' t= D, = f ? t 3 dt f ' 2 dt

Analytical Delay Models for Signalized Intersections

Incorporating the Effects of Traffic Signal Progression Into the Proposed Incremental Queue Accumulation (IQA) Method

The Highline Development Traffic Impact Study

LIC SR INTERCHANGE OPERATIONS STUDY

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY MANUFACTURING COMPANY

Roundabout Level of Service

Performance Analysis of Delay Estimation Models for Signalized Intersection Networks

Traffic Progression Models

h CIVIL ENGINEERING FLUID MECHANICS section. ± G = percent grade divided by 100 (uphill grade "+")

III. DISEÑO OPERACIONAL Y TRÁNSITO

Derivation of the Yellow Change Interval Formula

Cumulative Count Curve and Queueing Analysis

MnDOT Method for Calculating Measures of Effectiveness (MOE) From CORSIM Model Output

Traffic flow theory involves the development of mathematical relationships among

Analytical Approach to Evaluating Transit Signal Priority

FUNDAMENTALS OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING By Jon D. Fricker and Robert K. Whitford

MEMORANDUM. The study area of the analysis was discussed with City staff and includes the following intersections:

$QDO\]LQJ$UWHULDO6WUHHWVLQ1HDU&DSDFLW\ RU2YHUIORZ&RQGLWLRQV

A Delay Model for Exclusive Right-turn Lanes at Signalized Intersections with Uniform Arrivals and Right Turns on Red

2.1 Traffic Stream Characteristics. Time Space Diagram and Measurement Procedures Variables of Interest

Derivation of the Yellow Change Interval Formula

NATHAN HALE HIGH SCHOOL PARKING AND TRAFFIC ANALYSIS. Table of Contents

Vehicle Motion Equations:

Control Delay at Signalized Diamond Interchanges Considering Internal Queue Spillback Paper No

Traffic Flow Theory and Simulation

11. Contract or Grant No. College Station, Texas Sponsoring Agency Code College Station, TX

New Calculation Method for Existing and Extended HCM Delay Estimation Procedures

Control experiments for a network of signalized intersections using the.q simulator

Traffic Flow Theory & Simulation

To convert a speed to a velocity. V = Velocity in feet per seconds (ft/sec) S = Speed in miles per hour (mph) = Mathematical Constant

CVS Derwood. Local Area Transportation Review

Flow and Capacity Characteristics on Two-Lane Rural Highways

PBW 654 Applied Statistics - I Urban Operations Research

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

April 10, Mr. Curt Van De Walle, City Manager City of Castle Hills 209 Lemonwood Drive Castle Hills, Texas 78213

CEE 320 Midterm Examination (50 minutes)

Critchfield Rd / SR-129

Progression Factors in the HCM 2000 Queue and Delay Models for Traffic Signals

Analysis and Design of Urban Transportation Network for Pyi Gyi Ta Gon Township PHOO PWINT ZAN 1, DR. NILAR AYE 2

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Platte Canyon Villas Arapahoe County, Colorado (Arapahoe County Case Number: Z16-001) For

A hydrodynamic theory based statistical model of arterial traffic

Potential Issues with Advance Preemption. Roelof Engelbrecht Texas Transportation Institute

Advanced Computer Networks Lecture 3. Models of Queuing

FINAL Traffic Report for the Proposed Golden Valley Road and Newhall Ranch Road Projects in the City of Santa Clarita, California May 5, 2005

CPSC 531: System Modeling and Simulation. Carey Williamson Department of Computer Science University of Calgary Fall 2017

Real-time, Adaptive Prediction of Incident Delay for Advanced Traffic Management Systems

Lecture 7: Simulation of Markov Processes. Pasi Lassila Department of Communications and Networking

Airline Road: is a two lane residential roadway adjacent to the west side of the proposed school site with a speed limit of 30 mph.

S.170 th Street Micro-Simulation Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Port of Seattle/Aviation Planning

MAT SYS 5120 (Winter 2012) Assignment 5 (not to be submitted) There are 4 questions.

Traffic Modelling for Moving-Block Train Control System

The Timing Capacity of Single-Server Queues with Multiple Flows

A Cellular Automaton Model for Heterogeneous and Incosistent Driver Behavior in Urban Traffic

5/15/18. Operations Research: An Introduction Hamdy A. Taha. Copyright 2011, 2007 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

GIS-BASED VISUALIZATION FOR ESTIMATING LEVEL OF SERVICE Gozde BAKIOGLU 1 and Asli DOGRU 2

Per your request and authorization, we have prepared this traffic evaluation for the above referenced project.

STUDY OF CRITICAL GAP AND ITS EFFECT ON ENTRY CAPACITY OF A ROUNDABOUT IN MIXED TRAFFIC CONDITIONS

HALFF 16196? TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN. Richardson ISD Aikin Elementary School Dallas, Texas North Bowser Road Richardson, Texas 75081

Subject: Desert Palisades Specific Plan - Tram Way Access Sight Distance

CSM: Operational Analysis

Slides 9: Queuing Models

A Review of Gap-Acceptance Capacity Models

Intro to Queueing Theory

Introduction to queuing theory

Minimizing Total Delay in Fixed-Time Controlled Traffic Networks

Modeling Driver Behavior During Merge Maneuvers

Anticipatory Pricing to Manage Flow Breakdown. Jonathan D. Hall University of Toronto and Ian Savage Northwestern University

Introduction to Queueing Theory with Applications to Air Transportation Systems

Class 11 Non-Parametric Models of a Service System; GI/GI/1, GI/GI/n: Exact & Approximate Analysis.

Variable Speed Approach for Congestion Alleviation on Boshporus Bridge Crossing

1.225J J (ESD 205) Transportation Flow Systems

Using High-Resolution Detector and Signal Data to Support Crash Identification and Reconstruction. Indrajit Chatterjee Gary Davis May, 2011

Validation of traffic models using PTV VISSIM 7

Uncertainty in the Yellow Change Interval

Linear Model Predictive Control for Queueing Networks in Manufacturing and Road Traffic

March Grade Crossing Analysis

Non Markovian Queues (contd.)

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 9, Issue 6, June ISSN

Standard Highway Sign Border Specifications

Transcription:

CE351 Transportation Systems: Planning and Design TOPIC: Level of Service (LOS) at Traffic Signals 1

Course Outline Introduction to Transportation Highway Users and their Performance Geometric Design Pavement Design Speed Studies - Project Traffic Queuing Signalized Intersections Level e of Service in Highways and Intersections s Speed Zoning - Traffic Impact Studies 2

Signal Design The process of designing the different components of traffic signals 3

REVIEW 4

Summary (1) Start-up Lost Time (l 1) Time used by the first few vehicles in a queue while reacting to the initiation of the green phase and accelerating. 2 seconds is typical. Clearance Lost Time (l 2 ) Time between signal phases during which an intersection is not used by traffic. 2 seconds is typical. Lost Time (t L ) Time when an intersection is not effectively used by any approach. 4 seconds is typical. t L = l 1 + l 2 Total Lost Time (L) Total lost time per cycle during which the intersection is not used by any movement. 5

Summary (2) Effective Green Time (g) Time actually available for movement g = G + Y + AR t L Extension of Effective Green Time (e) The amount of the change and clearance interval at the end of a phase that is usable for movement of vehicles Effective Red Time (r) Time during which a movement is effectively not permitted to move. r = R + t L r = C g 6

Summary (3) Saturation Flow Rate (s) Maximum flow that could pass through an intersection if 100% green time was allocated to that movement. s = 3600/h Approach Capacity (c) Saturation flow times the proportion of effective green c = s g/c Peak Hour Factor (PHF) The hourly volume during the maximum-volume hour of the day divided by the peak 15-minute flow rate within the peak hour; a measure of traffic demand fluctuation within the peak hour. 7

General Approach for Signal Timing 1. Select phasing plan How many possible phasing plans? Phase The sum of the displayed green, yellow, and red times for a movement or combination of movements that receive the right of way simultaneously during the cycle. The sum of the phase lengths (in seconds) is the cycle length. 8

General Approach for Signal Timingi 2. Find the critical movements or lanes and calculate the critical flow ratios 9

Critical lane groups and Total Cycle Lost Time Y c = sum of flow ratios for critical lane groups Y c n v = i= 1 s ci L= total lost time per cycle ( ) L L n = i= 1 t ci 10

Summary (4) Flow Ratio The ratio of actual flow rate (v) to saturation flow rate (s) for a lane group at an intersection Lane Group A set of lanes established at an intersection approach for separate analysis Critical Lane Group The lane group that has the highest flow ratio (v/s) for a given signal phase Citi Critical lvolume-to-capacity Ratio (X c ) The proportion of available intersection capacity used by vehicles in critical lane groups In terms of v/c and NOT v/s 11

General Approach for Signal Timing 3. Calculate the optimum cycle length 12

Minimum Cycle Length C min L = n X c i= 1 X c C min = estimated minimum cycle length (seconds) L = total lost time per cycle (seconds), 4 seconds per phase is typical (v/s) ci = flow ratio for critical lane group, i (seconds) X c = critical v/c ratio for the intersection v s ci How to set X c? Usually less than 1 to account for randomness 13

Optimum Cycle Length Estimation (Webster) C opt 1.5 = n 1 ( L) i= 1 + 5 v s ci C opt = estimated optimum cycle length (seconds) to minimize vehicle delay L = total lost time per cycle (seconds), 4 seconds per phase is typical (v/s) ci = flow ratio for critical lane group, i (seconds) 14

Green Time Estimation g i = v s i C X i g = effective green time for phase, i (seconds) (v/s) i = flow ratio for lane group, i (seconds) C = cycle length (seconds) X i = v/c ratio for lane group i 15

Clearance Interval τ Y + AR min Y AR Y = t + r V w + l AR = 2a+ 2gG V τ min = minimum clearance interval t r = perception/reaction time (lower than 2.5, usually 1 second) w = width of intersection l = length of vehicle (feet) V = speed of vehicle a = constant rate of deceleration (ft/sec 2 ) G = percent grade divided by 100 g = acceleration due to gravity (32.2 ft/sec2) 16

Check for Constraints Pedestrians Bicycles Level of Service 17

Pedestrian Crossing Time G G p p L N ped = 3.2 + + 2.7 for WE > 10 ft. S p WE L + ( 0.27N ) for W 10 ft. = E 3.2 + ped S p G p = minimum green time required for pedestrians (seconds) L = crosswalk length (ft) S p W E p = average pedestrian speed (ft/s) often assumed 4 ft/s = effective crosswalk width (ft) 3.2 = pedestrian startup time (seconds) N ped = number of pedestrians crossing during an interval 18

Effective Width (W E ) from Highway Capacity 19 Manual 2000

Minimum Green Interval g = P -I min t where: g min = minimum green time (sec) P t = pedestrian crossing time (sec) I = clearance interval (sec) 20

Example Given: Intersection width = 60 feet 12 peds/interval S p = 4 feet/sec 9 ft crosswalk WALK interval = 10 sec Clearance time is 6 sec. G t = 3.2 + _L_ + 0.27(N ped ) for W E <= 10 ft S p W E G t = 3.2 + _60 ft + 0.27(12) 4 ft/sec 9 = 18.6 sec g min = P t - I = 18.6 sec - 6sec= 12.6 sec 21

LEVEL OF SERVICE AT SIGNALIZE INTERSECTIONS 22

Level of Service for car drivers: quantifying delays Two approaches Deterministic (uniform) arrivals (Use D/D/1) Probabilistic (random) arrivals (Use empirical equations) Total delay can be expressed as Total delay in an hour (vehicle-hours, person-hours) Average delay per vehicle (seconds per vehicle) 23

Design using D/D/1 System It provides a strong intuitive appeal that helps understand the analytic fundamentals underlying traffic analysis at signalized intersections. Consider the case where the approach capacity exceeds the approach arrivals. 24

Design using D/D/1 System λ= arrival rate, typically in veh/s, μ= departure rate, typically y in veh/s, g = effective green time in seconds, r = effective red time in seconds, and t c = time from the start of the effective green until queue clearance, in seconds. 25

D/D/1 Signal Analysis (Graphical) Departure Rate Arrival Rate Vehicles Queue dissipation i Total vehicle delay per cycle Maximum queue Maximum delay Time Red Green Red Green Red Green 26

Note Note that the per-cycle approach arrivals will be λ C corresponding approach capacity (maximum departures) per cycle will be λg. assumption that t μg > λc for all cycles (no queues exist at the beginning or end of a cycle). 27

D/D/1 System For the time to queue clearance after the start of the effective green The proportion of the cycle with a queue The proportion of vehicles stopped t c P P s q = = = ρr 1 ρ ( ) λ λ r + t C c ( r + tc ) ( r + g) = r + t C c = P q also, P s = λ λ ( r + tc ) μtc tc = = ( r + g) λc ρc 28

D/D/1 System The maximum number of vehicles in the queue, 2 The total vehicle delay λr D t = per cycle 2 ( 1 ρ ) The average delay per vehicle The maximum delay of any vehicle assuming a FIFO queuing discipline d avg Q max = λr = = 2 λr 2 1 ρ ( ) r 2C d max = 2 ( ) 1 ρ r 1 λc 29

Quantifying delays Analytical-Empirical Analysis 30

Signal Analysis Random Arrivals Webster s Formula (1958) - empirical d' = d + x 2 ( 1 ) 0.65 c 2 2 λ x λ 1/3 x 2+ 5( g / c) d = avg. veh. delay assuming random arrivals d = avg. veh. delay assuming uniform arrivals (D/D/1) x = ratio of arrivals to departures (λc/μg) g = effective green time (sec) c = cycle length (sec) 31

Signal Analysis Random Arrivals Allsop s Formula (1972) - empirical d' = 9 x d + 10 2 λ 2 ( 1 x ) d = avg. veh delay assuming random arrivals d = avg. veh delay assuming uniform arrivals (D/D/1) x = ratio of arrivals to departures (λc/μg) 32

Definition Level of Service (LOS) Chief measure of quality of service Describes operational conditions within a traffic stream Does not include safety Different measures for different facilities Six levels of service (A through F) 33

Signalized Intersection LOS Based on control delay per vehicle How long you wait, on average, at the stop light from Highway Capacity Manual 2000 34

Typical Approach Split control delay into three parts Part 1: Delay calculated assuming uniform arrivals (d 1 ). This is essentially a D/D/1 analysis. Part 2: Delay due to random arrivals (d 2 ) Part 3: Delay due to initial iti queue at start t of analysis time period (d 3 ). Often assumed zero but it depends on progression, arterial timing!!!. ( PF ) + d2 3 d = d + 1 d d = Average signal delay per vehicle in s/veh PF = progression adjustment factor d 1, d 2, d 3 = as defined above 35

Uniform Delay (d 1 ) d 1 = g 0.5C 1 C 1 min 1, X g C ( ) d 1 = delay due to uniform arrivals (s/veh) C = cycle length (seconds) g = effective green time for lane group (seconds) X = v/c ratio for lane group 36

Incremental Delay (d 2 ) d 2 = 900 T X 1 d 2 = delay due to random arrivals (s/veh) + X 1 2 8 kix ct ( ) ( ) T = duration of analysis period (hours). If the analysis is based on the peak 15-min. flow then T = 0.25 hrs. k = delay adjustment factor that is dependent on signal controller mode. For pretimed intersections k = 0.5. For more efficient intersections k < 0.5. I = upstream filtering/metering adjustment factor. Adjusts for the effect of an upstream signal on the randomness of the arrival pattern. I = 1.0 for completely random. I < 1.0 for reduced variance. c = lane group capacity (veh/hr) X = v/c ratio for lane group 37 +

Initial Queue Delay (d 3 ) Applied in cases where X > 1.0 for the analysis period Vehicles arriving during the analysis period will experience an additional delay because there is already an existing queue When no initial queue d 3 = 0 38

General Approach for Signal Timing Allocate available green based on critical flow ratios Calculate the capacity Check capacity/design flow rates and green intervals/minimum green intervals Adjust cycle timing if necessary 39

Adjustments Once done need to see if results work Make sure green meets requirements or adjust until it does pedestrian crossing Check capacity If significantly below capacity, reduce green time If close increase Compute LOS and delay and check Check for any other constraint 40