High contrast imaging at 3-5 microns. Philip M. Hinz University of Arizona Matt Kenworthy, Ari Heinze, John Codona, Roger Angel

Similar documents
Exoplanets Direct imaging. Direct method of exoplanet detection. Direct imaging: observational challenges

Exoplanets Direct imaging. Direct method of exoplanet detection. Direct imaging: observational challenges

Techniques for direct imaging of exoplanets

Suppressing Speckle Noise for Simultaneous Differential Extrasolar Planet Imaging (SDI) at the VLT and MMT

Direct imaging of extra-solar planets

Adaptive Optics Overview Phil Hinz What (Good) is Adaptive Optics?

1. Give short answers to the following questions. a. What limits the size of a corrected field of view in AO?

4. Direct imaging of extrasolar planets. 4.1 Expected properties of extrasolar planets. Sizes of gas giants, brown dwarfs & low-mass stars

The Potential of Ground Based Telescopes. Jerry Nelson UC Santa Cruz 5 April 2002

Direct imaging and characterization of habitable planets with Colossus

High Dynamic Range and the Search for Planets

Searching for Other Worlds

High-contrast Coronagraph Development in China for Direct Imaging of Extra-solar Planets

Exoplanet High Contrast Imaging Technologies Ground

Adaptive Optics for the Giant Magellan Telescope. Marcos van Dam Flat Wavefronts, Christchurch, New Zealand

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 2 Oct 2002

EPICS: A planet hunter for the European ELT

ADVANCING HIGH-CONTRAST ADAPTIVE OPTICS

Speckles and adaptive optics

Exoplanet Instrumentation with an ASM

Sky demonstration of potential for ground layer adaptive optics correction

Searching for extrasolar planets with SPHERE. Mesa Dino, Raffaele Gratton, Silvano Desidera, Riccardo Claudi (INAF OAPD)

AST 2010: Descriptive Astronomy EXAM 2 March 3, 2014

Spitzer Space Telescope

Searching for Extrasolar Planets with Simultaneous Differential Imaging

Exoplanets in the mid-ir with E-ELT & METIS

Transiting Exoplanet in the Near Infra-red for the XO-3 System

Science with EPICS, the E-ELT planet finder

Properties of Thermal Radiation

Optical Interferometry Phil Hinz Image Synthesis in Interferometry

FIRST ON-SKY HIGH-CONTRAST IMAGING WITH AN APODIZING PHASE PLATE 1

Exoplanet Detection and Characterization with Mid-Infrared Interferometry

A Random Walk Through Astrometry

Christian Marois Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

Medium baseline, high sensitivity, high efficiency imaging interferometer for general astrophysics

Coronagraphic Imaging of Exoplanets with NIRCam

Extrasolar Planets. Methods of detection Characterization Theoretical ideas Future prospects

Ground-Layer Adaptive Optics Christoph Baranec (IfA, U. Hawai`i)

TrES Exoplanets and False Positives: Finding the Needle in the Haystack

Extrasolar Planets. By: Steve Strom 1

Discussion Review Test #2. Units 12-19: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)

The High Order Test Bench: Evaluating High Contrast Imaging Concepts for SPHERE and EPICS

Searching for Earth-Like Planets:

G.Witzel Physics and Astronomy Department, University of California, Los Angeles, CA , USA

LARGE BINOCULAR TELESCOPE CORPORATION

Directing Imaging Techniques of Exoplanets

NICMOS Status and Plans

ADAPTIVE PHASE MASK CORONAGRAPH

Fundamental Limits to Wavefront Sensing in the Submillimeter

Supplemental Materials to An Imaging Survey for Extrasolar Planets around 54 Close, Young Stars with SDI at the VLT and MMT 1

Telescopes (Chapter 6)

Phase-Referencing and the Atmosphere

Ay 1 Midterm. Due by 5pm on Wednesday, May 9 to your head TA s mailbox (249 Cahill), or hand it directly to any section TA

Application of Precision Deformable Mirrors to Space Astronomy

ARIES: Arizona infrared imager and echelle spectrograph

Imaging Survey for Faint Companions with Shaped Pupil Masks 1

AST 101 Intro to Astronomy: Stars & Galaxies

An Introduction to. Adaptive Optics. Presented by. Julian C. Christou Gemini Observatory

Lecture #15: Plan. Telescopes (cont d) Effects of Earth s Atmosphere Extrasolar planets = Exoplanets

Exam #2 Review Sheet. Part #1 Clicker Questions

Planets are plentiful

What are the most important properties of a telescope? Chapter 6 Telescopes: Portals of Discovery. What are the two basic designs of telescopes?

Other planetary systems

PHYS 160 Astronomy Test #2 Fall 2017 Version A

Design reference mission construction for planet finders

x Contents Segmented Mirror Telescopes Metal and Lightweight Mirrors Mirror Polishing

Discovering and Characterizing the Planetary Systems of Nearby Stars The scientific need for medium aperture space coronagraph observations

Imaging polarimetry of exo-planets with the VLT and the E-ELT Hans Martin SCHMID, ETH Zurich

Keck Adaptive Optics Note 1069

Scientific context in 2025+

High Contrast Imaging: New Techniques and Scientific Perspectives for ELTs

Lecture #15: Plan. Telescopes (cont d) Effects of Earth s Atmosphere Extrasolar planets = Exoplanets

Useful Formulas and Values

Roadmap for PCS, the Planetary Camera and Spectrograph for the E-ELT

The table summarises some of the properties of Vesta, one of the largest objects in the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter.

Polarimetry and spectral imaging of mature Jupiter and super-earth with SEE-COAST

Why Use a Telescope?

Science Olympiad Astronomy C Division Event National Exam

The Principles of Astronomical Telescope Design

Seeing another Earth: Detecting and Characterizing Rocky Planets with Extremely Large Telescopes

Direct detection: Seeking exoplanet colors and spectra

GEMINI 8-M Telescopes Project

Palomar Testbed Interferometer (PTI) & Keck Interferometer (KI) Mark Colavita 7/29/2005 Michelson Summer School Pasadena, CA

Properties of the Solar System

Astronomy 1102 Exam #1 Chapters 1,2,5,6 & 16

Designing a Space Telescope to Image Earth-like Planets

Extrasolar Transiting Planets: Detection and False Positive Rejection

7. Telescopes: Portals of Discovery Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Addison Wesley

An Adaptive Optics Survey of M8-M9 stars: Discovery of 4 Very Low Mass Binaries With at Least One System Containing a Brown Dwarf Companion

Modern Astronomy Review #1

Active wavefront control for high contrast exoplanet imaging from space

MIRI, METIS and the exoplanets. P.O. Lagage CEA Saclay

Exoplanet Search Techniques: Overview. PHY 688, Lecture 28 April 3, 2009

Light and Telescopes

EXPOSURE TIME ESTIMATION

Astronomy. Optics and Telescopes

X Rays must be viewed from space used for detecting exotic objects such as neutron stars and black holes also observing the Sun.

Chapter 5: Telescopes

Recommended Architectures for The Terrestrial Planet Finder

NEAR: Low-mass planets in Cen

Transcription:

High contrast imaging at 3-5 microns Philip M. Hinz University of Arizona Matt Kenworthy, Ari Heinze, John Codona, Roger Angel University of Arizona ABSTRACT The 6.5 m MMT with its integrated deformable secondary, is an ideal platform for carrying out high contrast diffraction-limited imaging in the 3-5 micron wavelength regime. We have developed a dedicated camera for this purpose that can operate with high efficiency at both L' and M atmospheric windows. In addition we have demonstrated an approach to diffraction suppression, using a relatively simple apodizing phase plate (APP) that allows improved sensitivity to faint objects at several resolution elements away. These techniques are currently being used to search for Jupiter-like planets around nearby stars. 1. INTRODUCTION Direct detection of extrasolar planets is crucial to advance our understanding of the formation and evolution of planetary systems. Although planet detection through its gravitational influence on its star has yielded important information about planets around other stars, many parameters of a planet are most easily derived from its spectral energy distribution (SED) including its temperature, size, and composition. For planets in orbit beyond approximately 5-10 AU, the length of time needed to detect a planet through indirect means also becomes prohibitive. Yet these are precisely the orbital radii where we see massive planets in our own solar system. Initial success in the area of direct detection is just now occurring, although the detectable objects are still significantly different from what we think of as a typical solar system. Secondary eclipses of transiting hot Jupiters can begin to constrain the temperature and albedo of these objects. For younger stars (at wider separations) faint companions have been detected which are consistent with being planetary mass objects. However, these latter objects are unlikely to have been formed by either core accretion or gravitational instability suggesting that we are either seeing scattered planets or low mass objects that have formed by fragmentation. Direct detection searches are typically focused on very young stars where giant planets are rapidly cooling and contracting. They are thus expected to be relatively bright in the near infrared. The H band is particularly attractive for detection of young hot gas giants due to methane absorption which creates an identifiable spectral feature, as well as the relative brightness of a young planet in H compared to the K band. The majority of the direct detection plans with large telescopes focus on this spectral region, utilizing techniques such as simultaneous spectral difference imaging, angular differential imaging and higher order adaptive optics to optimize the achievable contrast. Several observatories are currently designing ambitious near-infrared instruments to pursue the detection of young planets. Although near-infrared sensitivity from the ground is better than at longer wavelengths, a significant contrast advantage can be achieved by looking for cool giant planets closer in wavelength to the peak of their expected SED. Giant planets have very nonthermal SEDs that depart significantly from simple Planck functions, requiring a knowledge of their

spectral characteristics to choose an optimum wavelength for detection. Additionally, the sensitivity of a ground-based system is dominated by the spectral dependence of the atmospheric transparency and brightness, limiting possible detection to discrete spectral windows. Fig. 1. Schematic representation of conventional and deformable secondary AO systems. The deformable secondary system provides fewer warm, IR emitting surfaces for lower background IR observations. It has long been known that Jupiter's SED displays an anomalous peak at approximately 4-5 μm[1]. This is due to the lack of absorption features in this spectral region which allows the observation of thermal emission from much deeper in the planet's atmosphere, at a higher brightness temperature than at other wavelengths. A similar, broader peak can be seen in T type brown dwarfs and is an expected generic feature for objects with effective temperatures below approximately 1200 K, ([2][3][4]). The anomalous flux appears in the L' and M bands for hotter object (>800 K) and narrows to a feature which is well matched to the M band window for cooler objects. Even though models are still uncertain, they appear to be more reliable for older systems where the thermal IR advantage is largest. 2. The MMT AO System To make use of this expected contrast enhancement it is necessary to detect the relatively faint planet flux in the presence of background from the sky as well as any warm optics in

the system. The relatively small expected separations require diffraction-limited performance, which in turn requires an adaptive optics system to correct for atmospheric turbulence. Typical AO systems add 5-10 warm surfaces. For wavelengths longward of approximately 2 μm the infrared glow from the warm optics can dominate the background and, thus, the noise. For planet detection at longer wavelengths an optimum system is one which is integrated into the telescope itself, such as the deformable secondary mirror or a cryogenic corrector. The MMT Adaptive Optics (AO) system makes use of the world's first deformable secondary mirror ([5][6]), allowing integration of the AO into the telescope itself. The deformable secondary is undersized to form the stop of the system, and an provide an effective aperture of 6.35 m diameter. The secondary undersizing is a proven technique to provide efficient baffling of warm background radiation from the telescope structure. Infrared light encounters only two warm reflecting surfaces, the primary and secondary mirror before entering the cryogenically cooled camera which eliminates background contributions from these optics (see Figure 1). The result is an infrared optimized system which is also capable of diffraction-limited imaging (a full width at half maximum of 0.13 arcseconds at L' and 0.16 arcseconds at M band). Compared to conventional adaptive optics systems this results in improved sensitivity. Lloyd-Hart [7] shows that for typical parameters expected at the MMT, observations with an optimized system can achieve the same signal in one third to one half of the integration time that would otherwise be needed using a conventional adaptive optics system at L' and M bands. Atmospheric turbulence is sensed using visible light reflected from the entrance window of the cryostat. The telescope pupil is imaged onto a CCD-based Shack Hartmann wavefront sensor operating at 550 Hz. The resulting slopes are reconstructed to measure and correct the first 56 Zernike modes of the turbulent wavefront. The system typically delivers Strehls of approximately 25% at H band in median seeing [8]. Scaled to M band this is a Strehl of 85%. 2 arcsec Fig. 2. Representative image using direct imaging at L'. The star is a relatively young star at 17 pc. A chance background star (upper right) allows us to confirm that we have sensitivity to detect a 5 MJ planet in an hour's observation. The object is L'=16.1 and corresponds to a contrast of 8.3 mag. The object is 1.9 arcsec away but could be seen with this dataset as close as ~0.5 arcsec, using PSF subtraction. 3. CLIO 3-5 MICRON CAMERA The use of 3-5 μm detection to search for gas giant planets is being carried out currently with the 6.5 m MMT, making use of an adaptive secondary and a camera, called Clio, built for this purpose ([9][10]). Initial estimates of sensitivity can be found in [11] and [12]. In

Figure 2 we show an example of observations that can reach interesting levels of photometric sensitivity at L' and M bands as well as probing the 10-40 AU region of typical targets. Contrast estimates as a function of separation are shown in Figure 4. Clio is designed for obtaining high spatial resolution images with optimum efficiency at L' and M band. The favorable contrast for planets at M band is at least partially offset by the high background in this atmospheric window. Our initial estimates of the relative sensitivity in these two bands suggests the L' band magnitude limit is approximately 2 magnitudes better than the M band limit, consistent with the higher background at M band compared to L'. This is a good match to the expected colors for giant planets. For example, models of giant planets ([2][3]) predict that a planet will be roughly 2 magnitudes brighter in M band versus L' for an effective temperature around 350 K. The coincidence of these two factors, a fainter L' limiting magnitude and a red L'-M color for a typical planet, provides favorable conditions for confirmation of any substellar companion. While common proper motion will still be important to verify physical association, confirmation via color is a strong secondary indicator that an object is indeed a planetary mass object. High efficiency observations with Clio are aided by an Indium Antimonide (InSb) detector, from Indigo Systems, Inc. which has a high well depth compared to more typical astronomical InSb detectors. This feature allows efficient use in the M band where high backgrounds can typically swamp detectors with lower well depths. The detector has a a measured well depth of 3 million photo-electrons[10]. 2 arcsec Fig. 3. Image of Procyon with APP coronagraphy at M band. The image shows how the APP approach can reduce diffraction on the left side of the image. The vertical yellow line marks the two sides of the diffraction pattern. Despite PSF subtraction, the right side of the image has worse noise characteristics. The inner red circle marks 0.5 radius, corresponding to 3 λ/d. Concentric circles mark 1.0 and 1.5 arcsec. The plate is sky limited outside of approximately 1 arcsec. Procyon B can be seen to the lower left at a contrast of 11.2 mag. 4. APODIZING PHASE PLATE A significant improvement to direct imaging at small angular separations can be achieved by suppressing the diffraction pattern. A range of solutions are available for this. We have developed an apodizing phase plate (APP) approach([13],[14]) to create a 180 degree

region about the star where diffraction is suppressed via a phase plate inserted at a pupil location in the optics. Compared to other coronagraphic approaches this has several advantages. The plate creates a dark region on one side of the star, independent of the star's location on the detector. This is an important feature that allows the use of standard nodding techniques for the IR observations. In addition the phase plate only modifies the wavefront phase, it does not block any of the light. This results in a high throughput device, which is important to not compromise background-limited sensitivities at larger separations. Finally, it is relatively straightforward to implement, involving a device that can be manufactured and installed into an existing camera. For observations at 3-5 μm, the sky sets the background noise for typical nearby stars, unlike NIR observations where the scattered light sets the noise floor and thus the detection threshold. Because of this difference, the use of a coronagraph at 3-5 μm is needed, not to reduce the photon noise from the star, but to reduce confusion noise associated with static or slowly changing aberrations in the optical system. Because of this difference, a crucial criteria for any 3-5 μm coronagraph is that it not reduce the throughput of the optical system. An apodizing phase plate coronagraph does not attenuate the beam, it simply modifies the phase of the light as a function of position in the pupil plane. This modifies the diffraction of the light in the image plane. By modifying the phase ( but not the amplitude) of the light beam, the phase pattern can only suppress the light on one side of the image. The effect is to create a dark D shaped hole to one side of the diffraction pattern. An advantage of the APP approach to coronagraphy, compared to most other designs, is that the dark D hole appears in the star image no matter what its location is on the detector. Most coronagraphs depend on focal plane optics that require precise alignment of the star image with the optic to work as designed. Effects such as vibration of the telescope can easily degrade their performance. This position independence of the APP's suppression also means that periodic beam switching and dithering - a necessity for IR observations - can be carried out in a way that is identical to standard imaging. We have begun exploring the apodizing phase plate approach to coronagraphic suppression with Clio and the MMT AO system. Successful on-sky demonstrations of a phase plate approach ([15],[16]) confirms that the APP approach is a simple, straightforward way to achieve good sensitivity at small separations. We are currently carrying out a survey on the MMT to look for super-jupiters at closer separations than has been possible with standard imaging at either H band or M band. The comparison of the Clio sensitivity for direct imaging and with the APP is shown in Fig. 4.

Fig. 4. Contrast limits from approximately one hour observations at M band on the MMT. The top data shows limits for direct imaging while the bottom limit is for APP observations. The data points are measured sensitivities and the lines show a 1/(λ/D) sensitivity curve. 5. THE LARGE BINOCULAR TELESCOPE INTERFEROMETER The MMT observations are limited by the sky background at relatively small angular separations. This noise floor can be significantly reduced by simply using a larger aperture telescope. In fact, it is expected that exoplanet observations in L' and M band will be of increasing interest for larger apertures since much of the interesting search space for target stars are simply limited by sky and telescope background, not noise from the star's scattered light. A significant sensitivity increase is possible through use of the Large Binocular Telescope. The Large Binocular Telescope is a common mount design interferometer with 8.4 m apertures on a 14.4 m baseline. The common mount design negates the need for long delay lines. Only three warm mirrors, primary, secondary and Nasmyth flat, are used to direct the beams toward the central instrument platform. This is especially important for thermal infrared (>3 μm) observations where telescope emissivity can be the dominant source of noise. The deformable elements of the AO systems of the LBT are integrated into the secondary mirrors of the telescope, which form the aperture stop of the telescope to optimize infrared performance. These several unique aspects of the LBT allow for efficient high sensitivity beam combination that is well matched to the goals of thermal infrared detection of extrasolar planets. The LBT Interferometer is planned for the central instrument platform of the LBT (see Figure 5). The instrument consists of a cooled optical train, called the Universal Beam Combiner (UBC) that combines the individual focal planes of each side to a common, central focal plane[17]. The UBC feeds a Nulling and Imaging Camera (NIC) that can carry out observations in the 3-5 and 8-13 μm atmospheric windows.

The MMT performance can be used as a baseline for expected performance of the LBTI. Since observations with the MMT outside of ~1 are background-limited for typical targets, the advantage of larger apertures improves both the inner working angle (IWA) and the limiting planet mass detectable. Fig. 5. The LBT Interferometer at the central instrument platform of the LBT. The common mount design of the LBT and deformable mirrors integrated into the secondary mirrors make the system uniquely sensitive for infrared observations of extrasolar systems. The scaling to LBTI assumes the same background, and similar Strehl for the images so that the limiting magnitude is simply scaled with the collecting area of the telescope. From current observations with the MMT we know we are limited to 3-5 M J planets and above outside of 10-20 AU. The LBT will push this limit to below 2 M J for a significant sample of stars and separations of approximately 3 AU. The best targets for such searches will be a combination of the very nearest (<6 pc) as well as stars slightly further away that have good indications of youth (<1 Gyr). 6. REFERENCES 1. Gillett, F.C., Low, F.J., & Stein, W. A. 1969, ApJ, 157, 925 2. Burrows, A., et al. 1997, ApJ 491, 856 3. Burrows et al. 2003, ApJ 596, 587 4. Baraffe, I. et al. 2003, A&A 402, 701

5. Riccardi, A. et al. 2002, in Beyond Conventional Adaptive Optics, 158 6. Brusa, G. et al. 2003, Proc. SPIE 4839, 691 7. Lloyd-Hart, M. 2000, PASP, 112, 264 8. Miller, D.L., Brusa, G., Kenworthy, M.A., Hinz, P.M., & Fisher, D.L. 2004, Proc. SPIE, 5490, 207 9. Freed, M. et al. 2004, Proc. SPIE, 5492, 1561 10. Sivanandam, S. et al. 2006, Proc. SPIE, 6269, 27 11. Hinz, P. et al. 2006, ApJ, 653, 1486 12. Heinze, A. et al. 2006, Proc. SPIE, 6272, 121 13. Codona, J. and Angel, R. 2004, ApJ, 604, 117 14. Kenworthy, M. et al. 2007, ApJ, 660, 762 15. Codona, J. et al. 2006, Proc. SPIE, 6269, 55 16. Kenworthy, M. et al. 2006, Proc. SPIE, 6272, 104 17. Hinz, P.M. et al. 2003, Proc. SPIE, 4838, 108