Understanding NMR. Geoff Page Baker Hughes Region Petrophysics Advisor Baker Hughes Incorporated. All Rights Reserved.

Similar documents
An Integrated Petrophysical Approach for Shale Gas Reservoirs

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Log

Seismic reservoir characterisation

2014 DEVEX Conferences, Aberdeen, May 6 th 2014 Morteza Akbari. 6 th and 7 th May Baker Hughes Incorporated. All Rights. Reserved.

ESP Technology Challenges for Ultra-Deepwater in Gulf of Mexico

EXTENDED ABSTRACT EVALUATING THE SHALY SAND OIL RESERVOIRS OF EL TORDILLO FIELD, ARGENTINA, USING MAGNETIC RESONANCE LOGS

NMR and Core Analysis

X-Ray Microtomography and NMR: complimentary tools for evaluation of pore structure within a core

FORMATION EVALUATION PETE 321

RESERVOIR ROCK TYPING USING NMR & CENTRIFUGE

A new Approach to determine T2 cutoff value with integration of NMR, MDT pressure data in TS-V sand of Charali field.

Introduction to Formation Evaluation Abiodun Matthew Amao

FLUID IDENTIFICATION IN HEAVY OIL RESERVOIRS BY NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE AT ELEVATED TEMPERATURE

IMPROVING THE ACCURACY OF NMR RELAXATION DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS IN CLAY- RICH RESERVOIRS AND CORE SAMPLES

NMR Oil Well Logging: Diffusional Coupling and Internal Gradients in Porous Media. Vivek Anand

SCIFED. Publishers. SciFed Journal of Petroleum A Comprehensive Review on the Use of NMR Technology in Formation Evaluation.

IMPROVED ASSESSMENT OF IN-SITU FLUID SATURATION WITH MULTI-DIMENSIONAL NMR MEASUREMENTS AND CONVENTIONAL WELL LOGS

Exploration / Appraisal of Shales. Petrophysics Technical Manager Unconventional Resources

AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE EFFECT OF CLAY TYPE, VOLUME AND DISTRIBUTION ON NMR MEASUREMENTS IN SANDSTONES

PETROPHYSICAL EVALUATION CORE COPYRIGHT. Petrophysical Evaluation Approach and Shaly Sands Evaluation. By the end of this lesson, you will be able to:

BUTANE CONDENSATION IN KEROGEN PORES AND IN SMECTITE CLAY: NMR RELAXATION AND COMPARISON IN LAB STUDY

AOG Conference Perth, West Australia 23 February, 2017

ECS Elemental Capture Spectroscopy Sonde. Fast, accurate lithology evaluation

Application of 2D NMR Techniques in core analysis

A new method for multi-exponential inversion of NMR relaxation measurements

Technology of Production from Shale

Malleswar Yenugu. Miguel Angelo. Prof. Kurt J Marfurt. School of Geology and Geophysics, University of Oklahoma. 10 th November, 2009

LITTLE ABOUT BASIC PETROPHYSICS

Fundamentals Of Petroleum Engineering FORMATION EVALUATION

Formation Evaluation: Logs and cores

NMR Logging Principles and Applications

N121: Modern Petrophysical Well Log Interpretation

Enhanced Formation Evaluation of Shales Using NMR Secular Relaxation*

NEW SATURATION FUNCTION FOR TIGHT CARBONATES USING ROCK ELECTRICAL PROPERTIES AT RESERVOIR CONDITIONS

Room 101. Computer Processed Interpretation, CPI GRRRRrrrrrrrr!!!!

Reservoir Rock Properties COPYRIGHT. Sources and Seals Porosity and Permeability. This section will cover the following learning objectives:

New Acid Combination for a Successful Sandstone Acidizing

PETROPHYSICAL EVALUATION CORE COPYRIGHT. Saturation Models in Shaly Sands. By the end of this lesson, you will be able to:

Geology 228/378 Applied & Environmental Geophysics Lecture 8. Induced Polarization (IP) and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR)

New Generation Permeability Logs

Permeability Estimates & Saturation Height Functions: A talk of two halves. Dr Joanne Tudge LPS Petrophysics 101 Seminar 17 th March 2016

Analysis of rock pore space saturation distribution with Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) method. Part II

Evaluation of Petrophysical Properties of an Oil Field and their effects on production after gas injection

Tissue Characteristics Module Three

NMR Fluid Typing Using Independent Component Analysis Applied to Water-Oil-displacement Laboratory Data

Calculation of Irreducible Water Saturation (S wirr ) from NMR Logs in Tight Gas Sands

Well Logging. Salam Al Rbeawi 2011

Introduction to MRI. Spin & Magnetic Moments. Relaxation (T1, T2) Spin Echoes. 2DFT Imaging. K-space & Spatial Resolution.

NMR RELAXIVITY GROUPING OR NMR FACIES IDENTIFICATION IS KEY TO EFFECTIVE INTEGRATION OF CORE NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE DATA WITH WIRELINE LOG

Diffusion Effects on NMR Response of Oil & Water in Rock: Impact of Internal Gradients

DETERMINING THE SATURATION EXPONENT BASED ON NMR PORE STRUCTURE INFORMATION

Petrophysical Rock Typing: Enhanced Permeability Prediction and Reservoir Descriptions*

MRI Physics I: Spins, Excitation, Relaxation

Estimation of Saturation Exponent from Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Logs in Low Permeability Reservoirs

IN SITU PERMEABILITY ESTIMATION: A COMPARISON BETWEEN ACOUSTIC AND NMR LOGS. Wei Chen and Daniel R. Burns. Xiao-ming Tang

NMR DIFFUSION EDITING FOR D-T2 MAPS: APPLICATION TO RECOGNITION OF WETTABILITY CHANGE

COPYRIGHT PETROSKILLS LLC

Lalaji Yadav* and Troyee Das Reliance Industries Limited, Navi Mumbai, , India

Relaxation times in nuclear magnetic resonance

Explorative Study of NMR Drilling Fluids Measurement

Rock-typing of Laminated Sandstones by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance in the Presence of Diffusion Coupling

The physics US and MRI. Prof. Peter Bogner

Raptor A New High-Technology, High-Value. Dr. Darryl Trcka Senior Research Scientist Raptor Interpretive Product Manager

The Basics of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Physics of MR Image Acquisition

Petrophysics Designed to Honour Core Duvernay & Triassic

Passive or Spontaneous Logs (SP, GR, SPECTRA GR, CALIPER)

NMR and MRI : an introduction

Understanding Fractures and Pore Compressibility of Shales using NMR Abstract Introduction Bulk

MRI in Review: Simple Steps to Cutting Edge Part I

INTRODUCTION TO WELL LOGS And BAYES THEOREM

Bakken and Three Forks Logging Acquisition for Reservoir Characterization and Completion Optimization

FORMATION EVALUATION PETE 321

Ingrain Laboratories INTEGRATED ROCK ANALYSIS FOR THE OIL AND GAS INDUSTRY

Principles of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Microscopy

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

Basics of Geophysical Well Logs_Porosity

Mechanical Properties Log Processing and Calibration. R.D. Barree

Core Technology for Evaluating the Bakken

IMPROVED FLUID TYPING WITH NMR: BETTER FIELD DEVELOPMENT PLANNING IN DEEPWATER NIGERIA

Classical behavior of magnetic dipole vector. P. J. Grandinetti

INTRODUCTION TO LOGGING TOOLS

Spin Relaxation and NOEs BCMB/CHEM 8190

Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Pål Erik Goa Associate Professor in Medical Imaging Dept. of Physics

Neutron Log. Introduction

Unlocking the NMR Potential in Oil Sands

FIELD-STUDY OF INTEGRATED FORMATION EVALUATION IN THINLY LAMINATED RESERVOIRS

INTEGRATION OF CORE, LOG AND TEST DATA TO IMPROVE THE CHARACTERISATION OF A THINLY BEDDED RESERVOIR

Well Logging Importance in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production

Magnetic resonance imaging MRI

Verification of Archie Constants Using Special Core Analysis and Resistivity Porosity Cross Plot Using Picket Plot Method

Topics. The concept of spin Precession of magnetic spin Relaxation Bloch Equation. Bioengineering 280A Principles of Biomedical Imaging

Fundamental MRI Principles Module Two

SATURATION-HEIGHT AND INVASION CONSISTENT HYDRAULIC ROCK TYPING USING MULTI-WELL CONVENTIONAL LOGS

egamls Inc. What we do: Well and field studies using GAMLS software (plus GAMLS licensing)

Formation evaluation of an onshore appraisal well KG-5, green field, Niger Delta, Nigeria

Blending Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Numerical Simulation

PROBING THE CONNECTIVITY BETWEEN PORES IN ROCK CORE SAMPLES

GEO4270 EXERCISE 2 PROSPECT EVALUATION

COPYRIGHT. Optimization During the Reservoir Life Cycle. Case Study: San Andres Reservoirs Permian Basin, USA

Transcription:

Understanding NMR Geoff Page Baker Hughes Region Petrophysics Advisor 1 2017 B A K E R H U G H E S I N C O R P O R A TED. A LL R I G H TS R E S E R V E D. TERMS A N D C O N D I TI O N S O F U S E : B Y A C C E P TI N G THIS DOCUMENT, THE RECIPIENT A G R E E S THAT THE DOCUMENT TOGETHER W I TH A LL I N FORMATI O N I N C LUDED THEREIN I S THE C O N FI D E N TI A L A N D P R O P R I E TARY PROPERTY OF B A K E R H U G H E S I N C O R P O R A TED AND INCLUDES VALUABLE TRADE SECRETS AND/OR PROPRIETARY INF ORMA TI O N O F B A K E R H U G H E S (C O LLECTI V E LY "I N FORMATI O N "). B A K E R H U G H E S R E TAINS A LL R I G H TS U N D E R C O P Y R I G H T LAW S A N D TRADE SECRET LAW S O F THE U N I TED STATES OF A M E R I C A A N D O THER COUNTRIES. THE RECIPIENT FURTHER A G R E E S TH A T THE D O C U M E N T M A Y N O T B E D I S TRIBUTED, TRANSMITTED, C O P I E D O R R E P R O D U C E D I N W H O LE O R I N P A R T B Y A N Y M E A N S, E LECTRONIC, MECHANICAL, O R O THERWISE, W I THOUT THE EXPRESS PRIOR WRITTEN C O N S E N T O F B A K E R H U G H E S, A N D M A Y N O T B E U S E D D I R E C TLY O R I N D I R E C TLY IN A N Y W A Y D E TRIMENTAL TO BAKER HUGHES INTEREST.

NMR: Basic Principles Measures relaxation of hydrogen nuclei in fluids Electromagnetic: No nuclear sources Measures fluid-filled porosity Lithology independent Measures fluid type Oil, water, gas: Volumes and properties Measures pore size Texture information Compartmentalises porosity Productivity Incremental Porosity (pu) 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 3ms T 2 Cutoff CBW BVI BVM 0.1 1 10 100 1000 T 2 Decay (ms) 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 10000 Matrix Dry Clay Clay- Bound Water Capillary Bound Water Mobile Water Hydrocarbon 2

Magnetic Resonance 3

Hydrogen Atom Properties 1 Proton 1 Electron Magnetic Dipole Spin (1/2) P N e S 4

How Does NMR Work? Magnetic field produces A time-dependent interaction is needed for proton transitions occurring between Zeeman energy levels: Resonance condition E B 0 E m= -1/2 m=+1/2 B B 0 0 quantum physics eqn. classical physics eqn. 5

Hydrogen in Fluids No external magnetic field B=0 Randomly distributed spins of hydrogen nuclei Water molecules H 2 O 6

Add External Magnetic Field B 0 Magnetic Field B 0 N Larmor Precession H freq. = 4258 z Gauss Know the magnet strength -> Know the frequency B o S 7

Nuclear Magnetization When placed in a magnetic field, B 0, the 1 H protons align parallel and anti-parallel with the field B 0 The ratio of parallel to anti-parallel is: 100,006 : 100,000... It is the extra 6 parallel protons that produce the NMR signal that we measure This is (absolute K) temperature dependent = A calibration parameter (0 K = -273 C) 8

N Tipping Pulse When a pulsed radio frequency field, B 1, is applied, the 1 H protons will realign with the B 1. When B 1 is switched off the 1 H protons begin to precess as they realign with B 0. S B 1 RF Antenna Protons align with B 1 when RF field is switched on, or pulsed 9

Nuclear Magnetization RF Antenna When the RF field is switched off the protons precess back to realign with B 0 As they precess r they emit a small RF signal that is received in the RF antenna. This signal decays as they re-align with B 0 Larmor Frequency = 4258 x H z B 0 Gauss 10

Pulse Sequence 11

Pulse Sequence Multiple protons A short time later 9 0 R F P u l s e Fast Slow 180 R F P u l s e F S F S F S 12 ECHO

Reversing Race! Start/Finish! 13 90

Reversing Race! Start/Finish! 14 90 180

Amplitude Amplitude Echo Train CPMG Pulse Sequence RF Pulses Echo Signals 90 x 180 y 180 y 180 y 180 y 180 y TE Time T1 T2 Echo Train TW Time TE : TW : intercho spacing wait time ( 3 x T 1 for full recovery) 15

Porosity 16

Echo Echo Echo Amplitude NMR Porosity NMR Porosity = Initial Signal Amplitude Calibrated to Water filled (Hydrogen Index = 1) T 2 Decay Curve Time 17

NMR Total Porosity = Mineral Independent 100% 0% Clay Minerals Non-Clay Minerals Total Porosity T2 too fast to measure in solids NMR does NOT see the extra "H" in clay minerals True porosity in shales 18

Sourceless Porosity 19

T2 Distribution 20

T2 Decay Components Bulk T 2b Depends on fluid type High viscosity = fast, a few ms. Low viscosity = slow, 1000ms + Surface interaction with rock - Surface/Volume ratio Depends on pore sizes, and surface type T2 =.5 1000ms Large pores = slower Diffusion T 2D Depends on viscosity, Magnetic field gradient "G" and TE Gas = fast, fluid = slow 21

MR Relaxation - T2 Decay Effects Echo Amplitude = Porosity 25 20 15 10 5 Wetting Phase Relaxivity 1 T 2a 3 components r S + V Non-wetting Phase Relaxivity 1 T 2b + 1 T 2D Fastest dominates Time (ms) 22

Porosity % Surface/Volume Ratio Pore Size In a single fluid filled pore the T 2 decay rate is inversely proportional to the surface/volume ratio of the rock being measured and directly proportion to the size of the pore. 25 20 1 S 1 r V T 2 r pore 15 10 5 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 Time (ms) 23

Incremental (pu) Multi-Exponential Decay A series of exponential decays are fitted to the data, resulting in the T2 distribution = S por. e - t / T 2 256 ms = 30 p.u. y = 5. e -t/16 + 10. e -t/64 + 15. e -t/256 T2 Distribution Typically 20-30 "bins" (decays) increasing by 2 e.g. 1/1.4/2/2.8/4/..ms 64 ms 15 10 16 ms 5 Time 16 64 256 T 2 (ms) 24

Echo Amplitude Incremental Porosity (pu) T2 Pore Volumetric Distribution from NMR, NMR Porosity T 2 cutoff (SS) = 33 msec T 2 cutoff (Carb.) = 92 msec 3ms T 2 Cutoff 20 4.00 4.00 15 T 2 Decay 3.00 3.00 10 Transform 2.00 2.00 5 0 15 30 45 60 75 90 105 120 135 150 Time (ms) 1.00 0.00 CBW BVI BVM 0.1 1 10 100 1000 T 2 Decay (ms) 1.00 0.00 10000 Matrix Dry Clay Clay- Bound Water Capillary Bound Water Mobile Water Hydrocarbon 25

Porosity - MR Analysis 100% 0% Clay Minerals CBW Non-Clay Minerals Total Porosity BVM BVI 26

Incremental Porosity (pu) NMR Log Data GR 4.00 T 2 Spectra T 2 Cutoffs 4.00 Resistivity & Permeability Pore Volumetrics 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 CBW BVI BVM 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 T 2 Decay (ms) MBVM MBVI MCBW Permeability 27

Low Resistivity Pay Example (Non-laminated) GR, SP & Caliper Resistivity Neu. & Den. Porosity Fluid Saturations Pore Volume High Capillary- Bound Water Water-Free Production Correctly Predicted Above Actual Transition Zone! High Capillary- Bound Water Transition Zone O/W Contact 28 Ostroff et al, 1999, SPWLA

Thin Bedded Pay Original Perfs Formation Volumetrics Perf s Resistivity & Permeability Sand Lam. Effective Pore Volumetrics Bulk Pore Volumetrics T 2 Spectra 800 BOPD Added Perfs 733 BOPD 29

Permeability 30

MR Permeability - k nmr Two models in use (Permeability is estimated not measured) Coates-Timur Model : k nmr C NMR m BVM BVI n SDR/Kenyon Model: k nmr C a NMR m T 2 Geo. Mean n Where assumed default parameters are: C =10, m = 4 & n = 2 Note: k nmr is an estimate of permeability based on a model. For accuracy k nmr should be calibrated to local reservoir data. 31

Part Ø [frac] Part Ø [frac] Part Ø [frac] Part Ø [frac] Part Ø [frac] Part Ø [frac] Part Ø [frac] Part Ø [frac] Correlation of k and T 2 Distributions Large pores 2.5 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 Ø = 25.8 k [md] = 1181 2 1.5 1 0.5 Ø = 24.8 k [md] = 250 0 0 T2 [ms] 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 Ø = 25.5 k [md] = 834 2.5 2 1.5 1 Ø = 19.0 k [md] = 1.65 0 0.5 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 Ø = 24.8 k [md] = 737 0 2.5 2 1.5 Ø = 18.0 k [md] = 0.14 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 Ø = 25.1 k [md] = 502 1 0.5 0 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 T2 [ms] Small pores 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 0.1 1 10 100 1,000 10,000 Ø = 24.6 k [md] = 360 NB. NMR provides pore size distribution. Permeability responds to pore throat size! T2 (ms) 32

Core-Calibration Gamma Ray T 2 Spectra Calibrated Core-Calibrated Uncalibrated Permeability Un-Calibrated Calibrated Core-Calibrated Uncalibrated Porosity Un-Calibrated 33

T1 Distribution 34

Porosity Polarization and TW NMR porosity is reduced if sufficient time (TW) is not allowed between experiments due to an incomplete polarization of the protons. T1 Porosity Correct T2 Porosity Low TW Correct TW Short Time 35

T1 Distribution Determination Complete T 1 Recovery T 1 Buildup Echo Train Incomplete T 1 Recovery T 2 Decay TW 1 TW 2 TW 3 TW 4 TW 5 TW 6 Longest Wait Time (TW) Shortest Wait Time (TW) 4.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 T 1 (ms) 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 0.1 1 10 100 1000 0.00 10000 36

Diffusion 37

Gradient Magnetic Fields and Diffusion B0+dB0 B0 B0-dB0 G Larmor Measure Frequency f+df f f-df Diffusion during the pulse sequence causes a reduction in signal amplitude with time and decreases T2. A longer TE or higher gradient increases the effect. Multiple TE Measurements Diffusivity distribution Time 38

Porosity Porosity T2 Shift due to Diffusion Short Echo Spacing Low diffusivity Fluid High diffusivity Fluid Long Echo Spacing 1 10 T 2 Time (ms) 100 1,000 10,000 39

Instrument Magnetic Field Gradients Multiple Frequencies = Multiple Sensitive Volumes Gradient field tools: - Measure Diffusion B 0 Tool 8 12 Borehole Borehole Formation Low gradient field tools: - Minimal Diffusion LWD Borehole Skid Magnet Wireline S S N N Antenna Blind Zone B 0 Sensed Region at fixed Bo=f 40 N.B. All measurements are shallow 1-4" depth

LWD NMR in Drilling Environment High Gradient Low Gradient B RF B RF Vibration Intolerant Vibration Tolerant 41

Fluids 42

Capillary Pressure (psi) Hydrocarbon Affects Clay Bound Water Irreducible Water Immoveable Ht.-Dependent Capillary Bound Water Moveable Water Hydrocarbon 250 200 150 100 43 50 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 Irreducible Sw FWL Total Sw (% ) 1 10 100 1000 T 2 (ms) N.B. Techniques available to re-calculate 100% water saturated T2 from mixed fluids Pore size Distribution

1D NMR Simple Analysis of T2 44

NMR Fluids Response CBW Irred. water Movable Water In porous media with Low Gradient Tar Heavy Oil Medium Oil Light Oil High GOR 0 WBM OBM OBMF Gas 3 sec CBW Irred. water In porous media with High Gradient T 2log Tar Heavy Oil Mov. Water Medium Oil Light Oil Gas High GOR 1 1 1 + T2 app T2int T2 diff ( G TE, D) WBM OBM OBMF 45 N.B. T2 apparent can be corrected back to Intrinsic.

T 2 i (ms) 1000 Estimated Oil Viscosity from MR Pore Volumetrics 4.4 cp T2 Spectra 0.1 10 1 100 10000 Samples from Bleridge field Oil viscosity standard 1200 T 2,log 0. 9 5.5 cp Adapted from Morriss, et al, 1997 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 100000 Viscosity (cp) Oil Viscosity 4.4 cp 46

NMR Porosity T1 for Various fluids Water T1 depends on pore sizes (wetting phase) Typically need 1-2sec Oil depends on API Typically 5-6sec Gas depends on pressure, temperature Typically 10-15sec T 1 Buildup 1.5 T W (sec) 8 Water Gas Oil 47

Porosity Porosity NMR Porosity Porosity Delta Tw - Differential Spectrum Long Recovery Time (Tw LONG ) Tw Short Tw Long Short Recovery Time (Tw SHORT ) T 1 Buildup Differential Spectrum 1.5 T W (sec) 8 1 10 100 1,000 10,000 T 2 Time (ms) Water Gas Oil 48

Dual TW Porosity & Saturation (LWD) 49 N.B. Shallow measurement

Fluids - T1/T2 Ratio and Diffusivity Non-wetting oil phase: OBM filtrate: Dry Methane: Richer gas: Wet gas, dissolved, condensates: T1/T2~1-1.5 T1/T2~1-2 T1/T2~100 < T1/T2 of methane < T1/T2 of dry gas Bound Water Moveable Water Heavy Oil Light Oil Gas T1 Very Short Medium Short Long Long T2 Very Short Medium Short Long Short D Slow Medium Slow Medium Fast 50

2D NMR Maps - Oil or Water? 51

2D NMR Maps Liquid or Gas? 52

2D NMR Results Oil & Gas Reservoir GAS Oil T 2 Gas T 2 OIL 53

Porosity - MR Analysis 100% 0% Clay Minerals CBW Non-Clay Minerals Hydrocarbon Total Porosity BVMW BVI 54

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinical MRI images are determined from - Quantity of 1 H present in the specimen Relaxation times present in the tissue 55

Other Applications 56

Height above OWC (ft) Porosity (pu) Pore size & Capillary pressure MREX T2 converted to pore size 5 4 3 2 1 0 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 Pore Throat Diameter (microns) 1mD 10mD 100mD Synthetic Pc curves from MREX T2 distributions 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 0 0.5 1 Sw (fr) 1mD 10mD 100mD N.B. NMR responds to pore size Pc responds to pore throat size! 57

Micro Scale Rock Model Fontainebleau sst Random, dense packing of equal spheres Creating a numerical model and cross-section Delaunay cell 58

Productivity Example: Oil Well 59

Coarsening up Coarsening up Grain Size Geology and Completions Sand Shale Clay NMR GR T 2app, ms Volumetric GS, microns GS flags 0 150 0.25 4096 0.45 0 0.25 8192 60

Summary Petrophysics Mineralogically-Independent Porosities Pore Size Distribution (Single Phase Fluid Saturation) In mixed fluids Clay-Bound Water Volume, Capillary-Bound Water & Free Fluid Volumes Permeability In carbonates Fluid types, volumes, distributions, properties Capillary Pressures, Sw irr Geology Grain size distribution Rock Fabric/Facies Characterization Mineralogy changes Cross-Correlation Reservoir Engineering Capillary Pressures Fluid changes Relative permeabilities Effective permeabilities Fractional flow Cumulative production prediction Drilling and Completions Grain size Sand production Screen sizes Completion intervals Completion type Perforation modeling 61