Controlled Pressure Drilling Applications for Enhanced Geothermal Systems

Similar documents
ractical Geomechanics for Unconventional Resources

Drilling in depleted reservoirs

ractical Geomechanics for Oil & Gas Industry

Dual Gradient Drilling Methods: Their Layouts and Pressure Profiles

PART I Hot Dry Rock Geothermal Energy: History and Potential of the Newest and Largest Renewable Energy Resource

Introduction to Oil&Gas Well Drilling

Cornish Institute of Engineers Conference th October 2013

Enhanced Geothermal Systems The Technical Challenge

MPD Uniquely Applicable to Methane Hydrate Drilling

Drilling Challenges Related to Geopressure Compartmentalization Selim S. Shaker, Geopressure Analysis Services (G.A.S.)

Faculty of Science and Technology MASTER S THESIS. Writer: Jieyin Liu

Introduction to Oil and Gas Production

Sensitivity Analysis of Geothermal Drilling Parameters - A Case Study of Well MW-17 in Menengai Kenya

Opitmising riser-less Drilling

Engineering in Support of Transformative Science

Pressure Regimes in Deep Water Areas: Cost and Exploration Significance Richard Swarbrick and Colleagues Ikon GeoPressure, Durham, England

Optimizing Drilling Performance by Wellbore Stability and Pore-Pressure Evaluation in Deepwater Exploration T. Klimentos, Schlumberger

DESIGN OF AN ULTRA-SPEED LAB-SCALE DRILLING RIG FOR SIMULATION OF HIGH SPEED DRILLING OPERATIONS IN HARD ROCKS. *V. Rasouli, B.

Activity Submitted by Tim Schroeder, Bennington College,

1 st National Iranian Drilling Industry Congress Under Balanced Drilling (Ubd) Technology

Drilling Technology - The Emergence of New Risk, From A Loss Adjuster's Perspective

EGS Sistemi Geotermici Potenziati

Drilling And Testing in the Deep Borehole Field Test

Colorado s Underground Injection Control Program: Prevention and Mitigation of Induced Seismicity

Hostile downhole conditions present complex challenges

Oil and Gas Production and Exploration, Part I

6. THE BOREHOLE ENVIRONMENT. 6.1 Introduction. 6.2 Overburden Pressures

Geothermal Systems: Geologic Origins of a Vast Energy Resource

Seismic Guided Drilling: Near Real Time 3D Updating of Subsurface Images and Pore Pressure Model

Petrophysical Data Acquisition Basics. Coring Operations Basics

Practical Application of Directional Drilling at Takigami Geothermal Field

SPE DISTINGUISHED LECTURER SERIES is funded principally through a grant of the SPE FOUNDATION

Drilling a geothermal well into a deep sedimentary geothermal reservoir conclusions from case study Gross Schoenebeck

Utilizing Instrumented Stand Pipe for Monitoring Drilling Fluid Dynamics for Improving Automated Drilling Operations

The Deepest Geothermal Well in Indonesia: A Success Story of Aerated Drilling Utilization

Productivity Injectivity Treating Rate Breakdown Pressure Treating Pressure Tortuosity Screenout.

A Brief Guide to Geothermal Wells

Well Construction and Cementing Practices in Shale and Salt Water Disposal Wells

Opportunities for Geothermal Development Created by New Technologies S2-1-2

Stress Calibration from Drilling Data

Shale Development and Hydraulic Fracturing or Frac ing (Fracking) What is it?

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF DEEPENED WELLS 420DA AND 517DA IN THE LEYTE GEOTHERMAL PRODUCTION FIELD, PHILIPPINES

Comprehensive Wellbore Stability Analysis Utilizing Quantitative Risk Assessment

Is It Likely That Fracking the Organic-Rich Utica Shale Beneath Bowling Green, OH Would Be Environmentally Safe?

Kentucky Geological Survey Marvin Blan #1 Hancock County, Kentucky Geologic Review. J. Richard Bowersox David A. Williams Kentucky Geological Survey

J.J. Kollé and M. H. Marvin. Tempress Technologies Inc. 2000

PROCEEDINGS THIRD WORKSHOP GEOTHERMAL RESERVOIR ENGINEERING. December 14-15,1977

DRILLING IN MENENGAI FIELD SUCCESS AND CHALLENGES

Slim hole drilling and testing strategies

J.V. Herwanger* (Ikon Science), A. Bottrill (Ikon Science) & P. Popov (Ikon Science)

Corporate Houston, TX... (713)

Can Geomechanics Improve Your Drilling and Completions?

MUDLOGGING, CORING, AND CASED HOLE LOGGING BASICS COPYRIGHT. Coring Operations Basics. By the end of this lesson, you will be able to:

NOTICE CONCERNING COPYRIGHT RESTRICTIONS

Modelling of Geothermal Drilling Parameters A Case Study of Well MW-17 in Menengai Kenya

85. An improved numerical simulation research for plunger pump in the condition of Newtonian fluid

The SPE Foundation through member donations and a contribution from Offshore Europe

Analyses of Field Measured Data With Rheology and Hydraulics Models

Chapter 13. Groundwater

The Role of Magnetotellurics in Geothermal Exploration

Heat (& Mass) Transfer. conceptual models of heat transfer. large scale controls on fluid movement. distribution of vapor-saturated conditions

Drillworks. DecisionSpace Geomechanics DATA SHEET

STAR SHIELD 500. Ultra Low Invasion Additive and Wellbore Stabiliser

How to Interpret Mining Company Drill Reports & Announcements

TEMPERATURE GEOTHERMAL SYSTEM *.BY. Roger F. Harrison Salt Lake City, Utah. C; K. Blair

NOTICE CONCERNING COPYRIGHT RESTRICTIONS

Control and Adaptive Observer Designs for Managed Pressure and Under Balanced Drilling

PORE PRESSURE EVOLUTION AND CORE DAMAGE: A COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS APPROACH

Pressure Analysis of ZK212 Well of Yangyi High Temperature Geothermal Field (Tibet, China)

Seismic Driven Pore Pressure Prediction

Feasibility Study of Casing While Drilling Application on Geothermal Drilling Operation

LESSONS LEARNED IN DRILLING DB-1 AND DB-2 BLUE MOUNTAIN, NEVADA

Rotary Drilling Rotary Drilling Bits

A Systematic Approach To Geothermal Power Classification

GEOTHERMAL BOREHOLE INVESTIGATIONS DURING AND AFTER DRILLING

Optimum Mud Overbalance and ROP Limits for Managing Wellbore Stability in Horizontal Wells in a Carbonate Gas Reservoir

Simulation Model for Ground Freezing Process: Application to Shell s Freeze Wall Containment System

Exploration, Drilling & Production

Helping people understand what drilling data is telling them. Frode Sørmo, Chief Technology Officer

GeothermEx, Inc. GEOTHERMAL RESERVOIR ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY FOR THE SCIENTIFIC OBSERVATION HOLE PROGRAM, KILAUEA EAST RIFT ZONE, HAWAII TASK 1 REPORT

Hijiori HDR Reservoir Evaluation by Micro-Earthquake Observation

The Evolution of Drilling Techniques at the Camden Gas Project. Chris Holmes and Jon Black AGL 27 th June 2007

Instructional Objectives

Rocsol D-Series Technology

A Field Case Example of Wellbore Strengthening Design and Verification Process

Fluids, Hole Cleaning and Tripping Optimization

NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF THE THREE-MATERIAL DOWNHOLE FLOW FIELD IN HYDROTHERMAL JET DRILLING

Introduction to Formation Evaluation Abiodun Matthew Amao

INTERPRETATION OF INTERFERENCE EFFECTS IN THREE PRODUCTION WELLS IN THE KAWERAU GEOTHERMAL FIELD, NEW ZEALAND. Lynell Stevens and Kevin J Koorey

Prof. Stephen A. Nelson EENS 111. Groundwater

Pore Pressure Estimation A Drillers Point of View and Application to Basin Models*

AADE-06-DF-HO-15. A. Arbizu, P Reid and H Santos, Impact Solutions Group

Early Identification and Management of Calcite Deposition in the Ngatamariki Geothermal Field, New Zealand

APPENDIX B SUBSURFACE EXPLORATIONS

GEOTHERMAL SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES 3. GEOTHERMAL RESERVOIR ENGINEERING

State of the Art in Coalbed Methane Drilling Fluids SPE Len V. Baltoiu, P.Eng. Brent K. Warren, Ph.D. Thanos Natras, P.Geol.

A deeper understanding

ECONOMICS OF INCREASED BIT LIFE IN GEOTHERMAL WELLS BY COOLING WITH A TOP DRIVE SYSTEM

Exploring and Drilling for Oil and Gas. Prepared by Tom Sheeran

Bit Performance Evaluation in Geothermal Well Drilling

Transcription:

Proceedings World Geothermal Congress 2010 Bali, Indonesia, 25-29 April 2010 Controlled Pressure Drilling Applications for Enhanced Geothermal Systems Julmar Shaun S. Toralde and Steve Nas PT Wira Insani, 5th Floor Talavera Office Park, Kav. 22-26, Jalan T. B. Simatupang, Cilandak, 12430 Jakarta, Indonesia julmarshaun.toralde@ap.weatherford.com; steve.nas@ap.weatherford.com Keywords: enhanced geothermal systems, controlled pressure drilling, air drilling, underbalanced drilling, managed pressure drilling ABSTRACT The adoption of new technologies, like controlled pressure drilling (CPD), has been identified as a way of reducing well costs associated with deep enhanced geothermal systems (EGS). CPD methods, particularly air drilling (AD), managed pressure drilling (MPD) and underbalanced drilling (UBD), are an aggregation of techniques that utilize a closed and pressurized wellbore by utilizing a rotating control device (RCD) instead of the conventional practice of drilling with the hole open to the atmosphere. The utilization of these methods usually translates to more effective and efficient drilling operations. Though these methods, especially air drilling, have commonly been used to drill conventional geothermal wells, they have not yet been largely utilized in improving the drilling operations of EGS systems. In EGS drilling, MPD and UBD methods have been tried, but AD, which has the greatest potential among the three to increase the drilling rate in hard rocks, has hardly been involved. This paper focuses on the potential of CPD methods, whether individually or in combination, for improving the economics of drilling EGS systems, in light of recent advances in CPD technology. 1. INTRODUCTION Controlled pressure drilling (CPD; Figure 1 for the CPD Wheel) methods utilize a closed and pressurized wellbore instead of the conventional practice of drilling with the hole open to the atmosphere. These methods utilize a rotating control device (RCD; Figure 2) to close the well at surface, thereby allowing for greater and more precise control over the pressure profile of the well, which translates to more effective and efficient drilling operations. The RCD is designed to direct the flow of drilled cuttings brought up by the aerated fluid away from the rig through the tee installed below it into the blooie line. The rubber seal unit rotates with and seals around the drillpipe and tooljoint when making connections or tripping in or out of the hole. The three main types of CPD methods are: 1) air drilling (AD); 2) managed pressure drilling (MPD) and; 3) underbalanced drilling (UBD). AD is mainly geared towards increasing the rate of penetration, MPD reduces rig non-performance time, while UBD minimizes reservoir damage and increases productivity. Air drilling, the application of air, mist, aerated liquid or foam fluid systems to lower the density of the drilling fluid, is mainly intended at reducing costs by drilling faster. It is a widely accepted technique for drilling geothermal wells for a variety of reasons, examples of which are minimization of circulation losses, increase in penetration rate, material savings, elimination of differential sticking, lesser water requirements, the ability to discharge during drilling, and the prevention of formation damage. The technique and the four different types of fluid systems (air, mist, aerated liquid and foam) it involves have been proven to produce positive results in geothermal applications worldwide. The International Association of Drilling Contractors (IADC) defines MPD as an adaptive drilling process used to precisely control the annular pressure profile throughout the wellbore (2005). The objectives of MPD are to ascertain the downhole pressure environment limits and to manage the annular hydraulic pressure profile accordingly. It is intended to avoid continuous influx of formation fluids to the surface. Any influx incidental to the operation will be safely contained using an appropriate process. The same organization defines underbalanced drilling (UBD) as a drilling activity employing appropriate equipment and controls where the pressure exerted in the wellbore is intentionally less than the pore pressure in any part of the exposed formations with the intention of bringing formation fluids to the surface. 2. CONTROLLED PRESSURE DRILLING AND ENGINEERED GEOTHERMAL SYSTEMS The United States Department of Energy report written by Massachusetts Institute of Technology scholars on engineered or enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) with the title The Future of Geothermal Energy: Impact of EGS on the US in the 21st Century, stated that EGS are different from conventional or high-grade geothermal systems in the sense that high-grade hydrothermal resources have high average thermal gradients, high rock permeability and porosity, sufficient fluids in place, and an adequate reservoir recharge of fluids, while all EGS resources lack at least one of these (MIT, 2006). An example it provided of an EGS resource is reservoir rock that may be hot enough but not produce sufficient fluid for viable heat extraction, either because of low formation permeability/connectivity and insufficient reservoir volume, and/or the absence of naturally contained fluids. EGS, as defined in the report, would exclude high-grade hydrothermal resources but include conduction-dominated, low-permeability resources in sedimentary and basement formations, as well as geopressured, magma, and low-grade, unproductive hydrothermal resources. Applied to EGS, CPD methods have the potential for increasing the rate of penetration (ROP), reduce fluid losses, allow for the management of wellbore pressures, and enable testing wells while drilling. Air drilling or aerated fluid drilling methods have the most potential for increasing ROP. Underbalanced methods can provide reservoir protection and reduce fluid costs. Managed pressure drilling gives control over pressure and over drilling hazards like losses, gains and collapse. CPD methods can also enable inflow testing, allowing for the drilling of only as much formation as required, though it is important to note that there are temperature limits for this. 1

Historically, CPD methods have been rarely used in the drilling of EGS worldwide, and conventional drilling methods are the norm. It has only been in recent years that managed pressure drilling, and then underbalanced drilling, were used to drill EGS wells, particularly in Australia. Air drilling and aerated fluids drilling has been used in drilling high-grade geothermal resources, but no record of its application has been found for EGS. 3. CONTROLLED PRESSURE DRILLING APPLICATIONS IN ENGINEERED GEOTHERMAL SYSTEMS All the CPD methods hold promise for greatly improving the economics of EGS projects, most of which are currently concentrated in Australia, where 33 companies have applied for 282 geothermal licenses (Australian Government, 2008). However, of the three CPD types, only UBD and MPD have so far been used to drill EGS systems, more particularly in the EGS drilling operations of Geodynamics Ltd. in Australia. Most of the data provided below on the application of UBD and MPD methods in Australia is based on the results published by Geodynamics in their annual reports (2004-2008). Managed pressure drilling, as applied by Geodynamics in the EGS wells they have drilled in the Cooper Basin, was defined by the company as exactly balancing the pressure from the well with a combination of heavy weight drilling fluid and back pressure. The method was first utilized by Geodynamics in 2004 for drilling the Habanero-2 well, its first deep geothermal production well, which was completed to a depth of 4,359 m (14,301 ft). According to Geodynamics (2004), operations in Habanero-2 did not only have to manage high over-pressures (5,200 psi / 35.85 MPa) and temperatures (250 C / 482 F), but also had to cope with much higher than expected permeabilities of the fractures in the target granites, developed as a result of previous hydraulic stimulation in the Habanero-1 well. Figure 1: Weatherford controlled pressure drilling wheel. 2

The MPD variant used in Habanero-2 is called Constant Bottomhole Pressure or CBHP. It is uniquely useful in this particular application due to pore-pressure estimate uncertainty, as often associated with deep-well hightemperature/high-pressure (HTHP) drilling and complex geological environments, can be easily accommodated by simple adjustment of applied annulus surface backpressure. increase the drilling rate of penetration (ROP), as compared to balanced drilling (Geodynamics, 2006). Reviews of the UBD operation recommended that the next drilling campaign take place with a conventional drilling rig operating under MPD for the bulk of the granite section (Geodynamics, 2007). The combination of full UBD with a snubbing unit was deemed not efficient for drilling the large sections of granite above the target fracture zone as it exacerbated spalling (breaking off of small rock fragments) within the well, leading to hole cleaning and stuck drill pipe problems (Geodynamics, 2007). After experimenting with and abandoning UBD with a snubbing unit as a drilling approach following completion of an independent technical review, Geodynamics decided to drill a new commercial-scale well, Habanero-3, with a larger diameter 8-1/2 hole, as opposed to the previous 6 holes on Habanero-1 and 2, using MPD methods. MPD was also used to drill the section below the 7 inch casing for Habanero-1. The process designed in-house by Geodynamics, was also used in Habanero-3 to help control drilling operations when overpressured fractures within the stimulated reservoir were intersected. Managed pressure drilling has therefore been used throughout all the Habanero wells of Geodynamics, as well as for the recently drilled well Jolokia-1. Figure 2: One of the recent rotating control device (RCD) models. As described by Weatherford (2005), CBHP enables walking the line between the pore- and fracture-pressure gradients. The objective of the method is to drill with a lighter fluid so that bottomhole pressure (BHP) is maintained constant, whether the fluid column is static or circulating. The loss of annulus flowing pressure when not circulating is compensated for by applied surface backpressure. An RCD, rigged up above the annular blowout preventer, and an additional choke facilitate this control. During connections, when the mud pumps are stopped, the choke is closed to apply annulus backpressure at surface, thereby ensuring that a constant BHP is maintained. The end result of using CBHP is that, as the hole is being drilled ahead or circulated clean, BHP does not change from its static value. The benefits these bring are as follows: drilling can be carried out with less ECD, the formation fracture-pressure gradient is less likely to be exceeded, losses are not incurred, and the hole section can be drilled deeper. CBHP MPD allows deeper setting of casing shoes and may ultimately reduce the total number of casing strings required for reaching well total depth (TD). This advantage allows reaching TD with a hole size large enough to ensure well productivity objectives. Underbalanced drilling was also used by Geodynamics for a well intervention on the Habanero-2 well. Geodynamics decided to use a different drilling approach using fully underbalanced drilling with water using a snubbing unit in order to eliminate the problem of lost drilling mud into the reservoir that has caused damage to the fracture permeability during previous drilling and were expecting to AD methods have the potential to cut drilling costs by 15% to 20% by maximizing the penetration rate, have not yet been utilized fully for EGS, although aerated fluids drilling has been largely applied in drilling high-grade geothermal fields in the Philippines, Indonesia and New Zealand (Toralde, Sosa and Nas, 2008). No record of air drilling and aerated fluids drilling use has been found for EGS in the region. 4. CONTROLLED PRESSURE DRILLING EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS FOR ENGINEERED GEOTHERMAL SYSTEMS Aside from MPD and UBD, the use of AD methods, especially with recent advances in CPD technology, can be utilized to improve the economics of EGS wells. Developments in AD technology that have applications in EGS involve higher temperature and pressure capabilities for both the equipment and materials used in the process. As mentioned in the MIT report, to extract thermal energy economically, one must drill to depths where the rock temperatures are sufficiently high to justify investment in the heat-mining project. For generating electricity, this will normally mean drilling to rock temperatures in excess of 150 C to 200 C; for many space or process heating applications, much lower temperatures would be acceptable, such as 100 C to 150 C. Higher pressures also have to be dealt with, as evidenced by the Geodynamics experience, where the presence of over-pressured granite sections have produced pressures as high as 5,200 psi (35.85 MPa), as well as temperatures up to 250 C (482 F). Recent advances in CPD technology have included the development of RCDs, air hammers (Figure 3), foam systems, and corrosion control chemicals that are able to withstand higher temperatures and pressures, making them uniquely applicable to EGS systems. Progress in deep hot air drilling has been made with the development of a high-temperature air hammer that is designed to work in temperatures of up to 205 C (400 F). 3

Hammers capable of withstanding higher temperatures are under development. Among the high-temperature features of the new hammer are a blow tubeless design, high temperature spring seats, choke, O rings, check valve seal, feed tube housing washer and feed tube compression ring. This type of air hammers have been successfully tested in the US and in China, and have been proven to increase the drilling rates of penetration by as much as 500%. In China, the technology was successfully used to drill a 12-1/4 hole with a bottomhole temperature of 191 C (375 F) up to 4,300 m (14,108 ft), producing a ten-fold increase in penetration rate. Issues associated with air drilling, however, like water production (wet formations), hole stability, gas production (small amounts of gas can be handled) and hydrogen sulfide presence, need to be addressed beforehand. applications are currently available. A high-temperature foam system is under development. 5. CONCLUSION The adoption of new technologies, like controlled pressure drilling (CPD), is required to reduce well costs associated with deep engineered geothermal systems (EGS). CPD methods, which are an aggregation of techniques that utilize a closed and pressurized wellbore by utilizing a rotating control device (RCD), are geared towards more effective and efficient drilling operations. Managed pressure drilling (MPD) and underbalanced drilling (UBD) have so far been used to drill EGS systems. No record has been found of the application of AD methods in EGS, despite of the fact that it has the potential to reduce drilling costs by as much as 20% by maximizing the penetration rate. In light of recent advances in CPD technology, the feasibility of utilizing these methods, AD in particular, to improve the economics of drilling EGS systems have increased, as CPD equipment and material capable of handling higher pressures and temperatures are being developed and tested. The varying nature and geology of the EGS systems, as well as the different approaches that have been taken by the companies pursuing their development, however, will require the customization of CPD methods based on the applications required. Figure 3: Air hammers and bits. New RCD models (Figure 2) that are able to handle drillpipe sizes up to 6-5/8 inches and tool joint diameters up to 8-1/2 inches, which are useful for extended-reach horizontal wells and ultra-deep vertical wells common in EGS that require large-diameter drillstrings, are now available. These RCDs can withstand pressures of up to 2500 psi / 17.2 MPa (dynamic) and 5000 psi / 34.5 MPa (static), and are applicable for the application of either MPD, UBD or AD in the reservoir section of EGS systems, where the pressure is closer to lithostatic, instead of hydrostatic, values. Butyl stripper rubbers capable of withstanding steam exposure and temperatures of as much as 121 C (250 F) continuously are available. High-temperature corrosion control systems that are jobspecific combinations of three corrosion inhibitors to provide quick passivation and long-term protection for downhole tubulars and hardware at temperatures up to 500 F (260 C) and are particularly suitable for EGS REFERENCES Dareing, D.W.: Balanced pressure techniques applied to geothermal drilling (Technical Report SAND-81-7130): Sandia Labs., Albuquerque, NM (USA) and Maurer Engineering, Inc., Houston, TX (USA), (1981) Geodynamics, Ltd. Annual and Quarterly Reports and Australian Stock Exchange Announcements from 2003 to 2008. Australian Government, Department of Resources, Energy and Tourism. (2008) Australian Geothermal Industry Development Framework. International Association of Drilling Contractors (IADC) Underbalanced Operations & Managed Pressure Drilling Committee (2005). IADC Well Classification System for Underbalanced Operations and Managed Pressure Drilling. Adopted by the IADC Board of Directors, 9 March 2005. Lyons, W.C., Guo, B. and Seidel, F.A.: Air and Gas Drilling Manual: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.; United States of America, (2001) Massachusetts Institute of Technology: The Future of Geothermal Energy: Impact of Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) on the United States in the 21st Century, (2006) Nas, S.: An Introduction to Underbalanced Drilling. Weatherford International, Ltd., (2007) Ogena, M.S., Gonzales, R.C., Palao, F.B., Toralde, J.S.S. and Bayking, E.C. Jr.: Aerated fluids drilling used in Philippines field to minimize well interference while infill drilling. Drilling Contractor, March-April 2007, pages 76-82, (2007) Rehm, B.: Practical Underbalanced Drilling and Workover: Petroleum Extension Service, University of Texas at Austin, Continuing and Extended Education, Austin, Texas; United States of America, (2002) 4

Rizo, T.M., Jr. and Cuenca, A.P.: Aerated Fluid Drilling Observations in Geothermal Operation in Luzon, Philippines: Paper SPE 12455 presented at the 5th Offshore Southeast Asia Conference and Exhibition, World Trade Center, Singapore. 14-81 to 14-96, (1984) Russell, M.A.C.: The Use of Aerated Fluids in Geothermal Drilling, Proceedings of the 9th New Zealand International Workshop 1987, Auckland, New Zealand. 153-157, (1987) Toralde, J.S.S., Sosa, J.C.L. and Nas, S.W.: Geothermal Aerated Fluids Drilling in the Philippines and Indonesia: Proceedings of the 29th Annual PNOC- EDC Geothermal Conference, Makati City, Philippines, March 6-7, 2008. 99-105, (2008) Weatherford International, Ltd. Information Sheet on Managed Pressure Drilling: Application Answers: Constant Bottomhole Pressure (2005). 5