New Cramér-Rao Bound Expressions for Coprime and Other Sparse Arrays

Similar documents
Coprime Coarray Interpolation for DOA Estimation via Nuclear Norm Minimization

Performance Analysis of Coarray-Based MUSIC and the Cramér-Rao Bound

Tensor MUSIC in Multidimensional Sparse Arrays

Two-Dimensional Sparse Arrays with Hole-Free Coarray and Reduced Mutual Coupling

Cramér-Rao Bounds for Coprime and Other Sparse Arrays, which Find More Sources than Sensors

PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF COARRAY-BASED MUSIC AND THE CRAMÉR-RAO BOUND. Mianzhi Wang, Zhen Zhang, and Arye Nehorai

ROBUSTNESS OF COARRAYS OF SPARSE ARRAYS TO SENSOR FAILURES

Co-prime Arrays with Reduced Sensors (CARS) for Direction-of-Arrival Estimation

EXTENSION OF NESTED ARRAYS WITH THE FOURTH-ORDER DIFFERENCE CO-ARRAY ENHANCEMENT

Generalized Design Approach for Fourth-order Difference Co-array

ONE-BIT SPARSE ARRAY DOA ESTIMATION

Real-Valued Khatri-Rao Subspace Approaches on the ULA and a New Nested Array

Generalization Propagator Method for DOA Estimation

The Mean-Squared-Error of Autocorrelation Sampling in Coprime Arrays

An Improved DOA Estimation Approach Using Coarray Interpolation and Matrix Denoising

On the Robustness of Co-prime Sampling

Co-Prime Arrays and Difference Set Analysis

ML ESTIMATION AND CRB FOR NARROWBAND AR SIGNALS ON A SENSOR ARRAY

On the Deterministic CRB for DOA Estimation in. Unknown Noise fields Using Sparse Sensor Arrays

Design of Coprime DFT Arrays and Filter Banks

computation of the algorithms it is useful to introduce some sort of mapping that reduces the dimension of the data set before applying signal process

A New High-Resolution and Stable MV-SVD Algorithm for Coherent Signals Detection

Correlation Subspaces: Generalizations and Connection to Difference Coarrays

SIGNALS with sparse representations can be recovered

DOA Estimation of Quasi-Stationary Signals Using a Partly-Calibrated Uniform Linear Array with Fewer Sensors than Sources

hundred samples per signal. To counter these problems, Mathur et al. [11] propose to initialize each stage of the algorithm by aweight vector found by

DOA Estimation Using Triply Primed Arrays Based on Fourth-Order Statistics

Performance Analysis for Strong Interference Remove of Fast Moving Target in Linear Array Antenna

Threshold Effects in Parameter Estimation from Compressed Data

2458 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, VOL. 46, NO. 9, SEPTEMBER 1998

FAST AND ACCURATE DIRECTION-OF-ARRIVAL ESTIMATION FOR A SINGLE SOURCE

2-D SENSOR POSITION PERTURBATION ANALYSIS: EQUIVALENCE TO AWGN ON ARRAY OUTPUTS. Volkan Cevher, James H. McClellan

DOA AND POLARIZATION ACCURACY STUDY FOR AN IMPERFECT DUAL-POLARIZED ANTENNA ARRAY. Miriam Häge, Marc Oispuu

Optimal Time Division Multiplexing Schemes for DOA Estimation of a Moving Target Using a Colocated MIMO Radar

A Novel DOA Estimation Error Reduction Preprocessing Scheme of Correlated Waves for Khatri-Rao Product Extended-Array

Sparse Sensing in Colocated MIMO Radar: A Matrix Completion Approach

DOA Estimation of Uncorrelated and Coherent Signals in Multipath Environment Using ULA Antennas

SPARSITY-BASED ROBUST ADAPTIVE BEAMFORMING EXPLOITING COPRIME ARRAY

A ROBUST BEAMFORMER BASED ON WEIGHTED SPARSE CONSTRAINT

SIGNAL STRENGTH LOCALIZATION BOUNDS IN AD HOC & SENSOR NETWORKS WHEN TRANSMIT POWERS ARE RANDOM. Neal Patwari and Alfred O.

Robust Range-rate Estimation of Passive Narrowband Sources in Shallow Water

SENSOR ERROR MODEL FOR A UNIFORM LINEAR ARRAY. Aditya Gadre, Michael Roan, Daniel Stilwell. acas

ASYMPTOTIC PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF DOA ESTIMATION METHOD FOR AN INCOHERENTLY DISTRIBUTED SOURCE. 2πd λ. E[ϱ(θ, t)ϱ (θ,τ)] = γ(θ; µ)δ(θ θ )δ t,τ, (2)

EUSIPCO

Root-MUSIC Time Delay Estimation Based on Propagator Method Bin Ba, Yun Long Wang, Na E Zheng & Han Ying Hu

SIGNAL STRENGTH LOCALIZATION BOUNDS IN AD HOC & SENSOR NETWORKS WHEN TRANSMIT POWERS ARE RANDOM. Neal Patwari and Alfred O.

Tensor polyadic decomposition for antenna array processing

ABSTRACT. arrays with perturbed sensor locations (with unknown perturbations). Simplified

Direction of Arrival Estimation: Subspace Methods. Bhaskar D Rao University of California, San Diego

Adaptive beamforming for uniform linear arrays with unknown mutual coupling. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters.

The mathematician Ramanujan, and digital signal processing

LOW COMPLEXITY COVARIANCE-BASED DOA ESTIMATION ALGORITHM

Azimuth-elevation direction finding, using one fourcomponent acoustic vector-sensor spread spatially along a straight line

Research Article Novel Diagonal Reloading Based Direction of Arrival Estimation in Unknown Non-Uniform Noise

Joint Direction-of-Arrival and Order Estimation in Compressed Sensing using Angles between Subspaces

An introduction to G-estimation with sample covariance matrices

COMPLEX CONSTRAINED CRB AND ITS APPLICATION TO SEMI-BLIND MIMO AND OFDM CHANNEL ESTIMATION. Aditya K. Jagannatham and Bhaskar D.

A HIGH RESOLUTION DOA ESTIMATING METHOD WITHOUT ESTIMATING THE NUMBER OF SOURCES

2542 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, VOL. 62, NO. 10, MAY 15, Keyong Han, Student Member, IEEE, and Arye Nehorai, Fellow, IEEE

Robust Adaptive Beamforming Based on Low-Complexity Shrinkage-Based Mismatch Estimation

Copyright c 2006 IEEE. Reprinted from:

ADAPTIVE ANTENNAS. SPATIAL BF

This is a repository copy of Direction finding and mutual coupling estimation for uniform rectangular arrays.

2484 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, VOL. 46, NO. 9, SEPTEMBER Weighted Subspace Fitting for General Array Error Models

Direction Finding for Bistatic MIMO Radar with Non-Circular Sources

DOA Estimation using MUSIC and Root MUSIC Methods

THE BAYESIAN ABEL BOUND ON THE MEAN SQUARE ERROR

IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL, VOL. 17, NO. 3, FEBRUARY 1,

CP DECOMPOSITION AND ITS APPLICATION IN NOISE REDUCTION AND MULTIPLE SOURCES IDENTIFICATION

IEEE copyright notice

On the Application of the Global Matched Filter to DOA Estimation with Uniform Circular Arrays

THE estimation of covariance matrices is a crucial component

On DOA estimation in unknown colored noise-fields using an imperfect estimate of the noise covariance. Karl Werner and Magnus Jansson

Research Article Joint Phased-MIMO and Nested-Array Beamforming for Increased Degrees-of-Freedom

Conditional and Unconditional Cramér Rao Bounds for Near-Field Source Localization

Underdetermined DOA Estimation Using MVDR-Weighted LASSO

JOINT ANGLE-DELAY ESTIMATION BASED ON SMOOTHED MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD ALGORITHM

DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF MULTI-COSET ARRAYS

-Dimensional ESPRIT-Type Algorithms for Strictly Second-Order Non-Circular Sources and Their Performance Analysis

Measure-Transformed Quasi Maximum Likelihood Estimation

Vandermonde-form Preserving Matrices And The Generalized Signal Richness Preservation Problem

OPTIMAL ADAPTIVE TRANSMIT BEAMFORMING FOR COGNITIVE MIMO SONAR IN A SHALLOW WATER WAVEGUIDE

Performance Analysis of an Adaptive Algorithm for DOA Estimation

Using an Oblique Projection Operator for Highly Correlated Signal Direction-of-Arrival Estimations

Copyright 2008 IEEE. Reprinted from IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2007; 55 (1):20-31

On the duality of Phase-based and Phase-less RSSI MUSIC algorithm for Direction of Arrival estimation

Energy Based Acoustic Source Localization

Sensitivity Considerations in Compressed Sensing

THERE is considerable literature about second-order statistics-based

Spatial Smoothing and Broadband Beamforming. Bhaskar D Rao University of California, San Diego

Support recovery in compressive sensing for estimation of Direction-Of-Arrival

IN THE FIELD of array signal processing, a class of

Generalized Sidelobe Canceller and MVDR Power Spectrum Estimation. Bhaskar D Rao University of California, San Diego

I Introduction Sensor array processing has been a key technology in radar, sonar, communications and biomedical signal processing. Recently, as the ce

ON IDENTIFIABILITY AND INFORMATION-REGULARITY IN PARAMETRIZED NORMAL DISTRIBUTIONS*

Faouzi Belli1i, and Sofiene Affes. Sonia Ben Hassen, and Abdelaziz Samet

Self-Calibration and Biconvex Compressive Sensing

CLOSED-FORM 2D ANGLE ESTIMATION WITH A SPHERICAL ARRAY VIA SPHERICAL PHASE MODE EXCITATION AND ESPRIT. Roald Goossens and Hendrik Rogier

IMPROVED BLIND 2D-DIRECTION OF ARRIVAL ESTI- MATION WITH L-SHAPED ARRAY USING SHIFT IN- VARIANCE PROPERTY

Improved Unitary Root-MUSIC for DOA Estimation Based on Pseudo-Noise Resampling

Transcription:

New Cramér-Rao Bound Expressions for Coprime and Other Sparse Arrays Chun-Lin Liu 1 P. P. Vaidyanathan 2 1,2 Dept. of Electrical Engineering, MC 136-93 California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA cl.liu@caltech.edu 1, ppvnath@systems.caltech.edu 2 SAM 2016 Liu and Vaidyanathan CRB for Sparse Arrays SAM 2016 1 / 20

Outline 1 DOA Estimation using Sparse Arrays 2 Cramér-Rao Bounds for Sparse Arrays 3 Numerical Examples 4 Concluding Remarks Liu and Vaidyanathan CRB for Sparse Arrays SAM 2016 2 / 20

DOA Estimation using Sparse Arrays Outline 1 DOA Estimation using Sparse Arrays 2 Cramér-Rao Bounds for Sparse Arrays 3 Numerical Examples 4 Concluding Remarks Liu and Vaidyanathan CRB for Sparse Arrays SAM 2016 3 / 20

DOA Estimation using Sparse Arrays Direction-of-arrival (DOA) estimation 1 θ i Monochromatic Uncorrelated Sources Sensor Arrays DOA Estimators Estimated DOA θ i 1 Van Trees, Optimum Array Processing: Part IV of Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory, 2002. Liu and Vaidyanathan CRB for Sparse Arrays SAM 2016 4 / 20

DOA Estimation using Sparse Arrays ULA and sparse arrays ULA (not sparse) Identify at most N 1 uncorrelated sources, given N sensors. 1 Can only find fewer sources than sensors. Sparse arrays 1 Minimum redundancy arrays 2 2 Nested arrays 3 3 Coprime arrays 4 4 Super nested arrays 5 Identify O(N 2 ) uncorrelated sources with O(N) physical sensors. More sources than sensors! 1 Van Trees, Optimum Array Processing: Part IV of Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory, 2002. 2 Moffet, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 1968. 3 Pal and Vaidyanathan, IEEE Trans. Signal Proc., 2010. 4 Vaidyanathan and Pal, IEEE Trans. Signal Proc., 2011. 5 Liu and Vaidyanathan, IEEE Trans. Signal Proc., 2016. Liu and Vaidyanathan CRB for Sparse Arrays SAM 2016 5 / 20

Coprime arrays 1 DOA Estimation using Sparse Arrays The coprime array with (M, N) = 1 is the union of 1 an N-element ULA with spacing Mλ/2 and 2 a 2M-element ULA with spacing Nλ/2. ULA (1) ULA (2) Physical array S (M = 3, N = 4): 0 3 4 6 8 9 12 16 20 Difference coarray D = {n 1 n 2 n 1, n 2 S} 20 14 0 14 20 Holes 1 Vaidyanathan and Pal, IEEE Trans. Signal Proc., 2011. Liu and Vaidyanathan CRB for Sparse Arrays SAM 2016 6 / 20

DOA Estimation using Sparse Arrays DOA estimation using sparse arrays Multiple data vectors in the physical array S S = O(N) Step 1 A single correlation vector in the difference array D D = O(N 2 ) Step 2: DOA estimation using this single correlation vector. Spatial smoothing MUSIC (SS MUSIC), 1 to name a few 2,3. 1 Pal and Vaidyanathan, IEEE Trans. Signal Proc., 2010. Empirically, SS MUSIC can identify up to ( U 1)/2 uncorrelated sources with sufficient snapshots. Why? D U 2 Abramovich, Spencer, and Gorokhov, IEEE Trans. Signal Proc., 1998, 1999. 3 Zhang, Amin, and Himed, IEEE ICASSP, 2013; Pal and Vaidyanathan, IEEE Trans. Signal Proc., 2015; Liu and Vaidyanathan CRB for Sparse Arrays SAM 2016 7 / 20

Cramér-Rao Bounds for Sparse Arrays Outline 1 DOA Estimation using Sparse Arrays 2 Cramér-Rao Bounds for Sparse Arrays 3 Numerical Examples 4 Concluding Remarks Liu and Vaidyanathan CRB for Sparse Arrays SAM 2016 8 / 20

Cramér-Rao Bounds for Sparse Arrays Fisher Information Matrices and Cramér-Rao Bounds x: random vectors with distribution p(x; α). α: Real-valued, unknown, and deterministic parameters. FIM I(α), based on p(x; α) and α. (under some regularity conditions) If I(α) is nonsingular, then CRB(α) I 1 (α). If α(x) is a unbiased estimator of α, then Cov( α(x)) CRB(α). CRB depend only on p(x; α) and α, NOT on the estimators α(x). CRB pose fundamental limits to the estimation performance of all unbiased estimators. Liu and Vaidyanathan CRB for Sparse Arrays SAM 2016 9 / 20

Related work Cramér-Rao Bounds for Sparse Arrays 1 Deterministic CRB 1 assumes A i (k) are deterministic. 2 Stochastic CRB 2 becomes invalid for D > S since VS HV S is singular. CRB = pn 2K Re [ H Q T ] 1 H = U H S [I V S(VS HV S) 1 VS H]U S. 3 Abramovich et al. 3 plotted the CRB curves numerically. 4 Jansson et al. s CRB expressions 4 are undefined if D = S. x S (k) = D A i (k)v S ( θ i )+n S (k) i=1 V S = [v S ( θ i )] C S D SS MUSIC Sources are stochastic and known to be uncorrelated. (E[A i (k 1 )A j (k 2)] = p i δ i,j δ k1,k 2 ) Resolve more sources than sensors (D S ). 1 Stoca and Nehorai, IEEE Trans. Acoustics, Speech and Signal Proc., 1989. 2 Stoca and Nehorai, IEEE Trans. Acoustics, Speech and Signal Proc., 1990. 3 Abramovich, Gray, Gorokhov, and Spencer, IEEE Trans. Signal Proc., 1998. 4 Jansson, Göransson, and Ottersten, IEEE Trans. Signal Proc., 1999. Liu and Vaidyanathan CRB for Sparse Arrays SAM 2016 10 / 20

Cramér-Rao Bounds for Sparse Arrays Augmented Coarray Manifold matrices (Proposed) A c = [ diag(d)v D V D e 0 ] D = { 4, 3, 1, 0, 1, 3, 4}. D = 2 sources θ 1 and θ 2. D D 1 ( 4)e j2π θ 1 ( 4) ( 3)e j2π θ 1 ( 3) ( 1)e j2π θ 1 ( 1) (0)e j2π θ 1 (0) (1)e j2π θ 1 (1) (3)e j2π θ 1 (3) (4)e j2π θ 1 (4) ( 4)e j2π θ 2 ( 4) ( 3)e j2π θ 2 ( 3) ( 1)e j2π θ 2 ( 1) (0)e j2π θ 2 (0) (1)e j2π θ 2 (1) (3)e j2π θ 2 (3) (4)e j2π θ 2 (4) e j2π θ 1 ( 4) e j2π θ 1 ( 3) e j2π θ 1 ( 1) e j2π θ 1 (0) e j2π θ 1 (1) e j2π θ 1 (3) e j2π θ 1 (4) e j2π θ 2 ( 4) e j2π θ 2 ( 3) e j2π θ 2 ( 1) e j2π θ 2 (0) e j2π θ 2 (1) e j2π θ 2 (3) e j2π θ 2 (4) 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 D diag(d)v D V D e 0 Liu and Vaidyanathan CRB for Sparse Arrays SAM 2016 11 / 20

Cramér-Rao Bounds for Sparse Arrays The proposed CRB expression for sparse arrays 1 A c has full column rank. (rank(a c ) = 2D + 1) if and only if FIM is nonsingular. (CRB exists) CRB( θ) = CRB( θ 1,..., θ ( ) D ) = 1 4π 2 K G H 0 Π 1 MW D G 0. { θ i } D i=1 : normalized DOAs. θ i = 0.5 sin θ i [ 0.5, 0.5]. S: The physical array. D: The difference coarray. p i : The ith source power. p n: The noise power. K: Number of snapshots. V D = [v D ( θ 1 ),..., v D ( θ D )]. W D = [V D, e 0 ]. P = diag(p 1,..., p D ). G 0 = Mdiag(D)V D P. M = (J H (R T S R S) 1 J) 1/2 0. R S = D i=1 p i v S ( θ i )vs H ( θ i ) + p ni. J {0, 1} S 2 D, J :,m = vec(i(m)), m D. I(m) n1,n 2 = { 1, if n 1 n 2 = m, 0, otherwise, n 1, n 2 S. 1 Liu and Vaidyanathan, Digital Signal Proc.,Elsevier, 2016; http://systems.caltech.edu/dsp/students/clliu/crb.html Liu and Vaidyanathan CRB for Sparse Arrays SAM 2016 12 / 20

Cramér-Rao Bounds for Sparse Arrays Implications drawn from the CRB expressions ACM matrices depend on The difference coarray D, the normalized DOA θ = [ θ 1,..., θ D ] T, and the number of sources D. These factors influence the existence of CRB. A c = [ ] diag(d)v D V D e 0 CRB( θ) = 1 4π 2 K (G H 0 Π MWD G 0 ) 1 CRB depend on The physical array S, the normalized DOA θ = [ θ 1,..., θ D ] T, the number of sources D, the number of snapshots K, and the SNR p 1 /p n,..., p D /p n. These parameters control the values of CRB. If rank(a c ) = 2D + 1, then lim K CRB( θ) = 0. Liu and Vaidyanathan CRB for Sparse Arrays SAM 2016 13 / 20

Cramér-Rao Bounds for Sparse Arrays Asymptotic CRB expressions for large SNR 1 1 A c has full column rank. 2 D uncorrelated sources have equal SNR p/p n. 3 Large SNR (p/p n ). Theorem (rank(v S ) < S ) CRB( θ) = D < S 1 4π 2 K(p/p n ) S 1 1, where S 1 is positive definite and independent of SNR. lim CRB( θ) = 0. p/p n Theorem (rank(v S ) S ) Typically D S CRB( θ) = 1 4π 2 K S 1 2, where S 2 is positive definite and independent of SNR. lim CRB( θ) 0. p/p n 1 These phenomena were observed by Abramovich et al. in 1998, which can be proved using our CRB expressions. Liu and Vaidyanathan CRB for Sparse Arrays SAM 2016 14 / 20

Numerical Examples Outline 1 DOA Estimation using Sparse Arrays 2 Cramér-Rao Bounds for Sparse Arrays 3 Numerical Examples 4 Concluding Remarks Liu and Vaidyanathan CRB for Sparse Arrays SAM 2016 15 / 20

Numerical Examples CRB vs SNR, fewer sources than sensors (D < S = 4) CRB( θ1) 10 0 10-5 D = 1 D = 2 D = 3 D = 1, Asymptotic D = 2, Asymptotic D = 3, Asymptotic 10-10 -20-10 0 10 20 30 40 SNR (db) S = {1, 2, 3, 6}. D = { 5,..., 5}. θ i = 0.49 + 0.95(i 1)/D. The number of snapshots K = 200. Liu and Vaidyanathan CRB for Sparse Arrays SAM 2016 16 / 20

Numerical Examples CRB vs SNR, more sources than sensors (D S = 4) CRB( θ1) 10 0 10-2 10-4 D = 4 D = 5 D = 4, Asymptotic D = 5, Asymptotic 10-6 10-8 -20-10 0 10 20 30 40 SNR (db) S = {1, 2, 3, 6}. D = { 5,..., 5}. θ i = 0.49 + 0.95(i 1)/D. The number of snapshots K = 200. Liu and Vaidyanathan CRB for Sparse Arrays SAM 2016 17 / 20

Numerical Examples CRB vs D, coprime array, 10 sensors 1 S ( U 1)/2 ( D 1)/2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 D 10 15 rank(a c ) = 2D + 1 Cannot judge rank(a c ) < 2D + 1 CRB( θ1) 10 10 10 5 10 0 10-5 10-10 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Number of sources D M = 3, N = 5, S = {0, 3, 5, 6, 9, 10, 12, 15, 20, 25}. D = {0, ±1,..., ±17, ±19, ±20, ±22, ±25}. θ i = 0.48 + (i 1)/D for i = 1,..., D. 20dB SNR, 500 snapshots. 1 Liu and Vaidyanathan, Digital Signal Proc.,Elsevier, 2016; http://systems.caltech.edu/dsp/students/clliu/crb.html Liu and Vaidyanathan CRB for Sparse Arrays SAM 2016 18 / 20

Concluding Remarks Outline 1 DOA Estimation using Sparse Arrays 2 Cramér-Rao Bounds for Sparse Arrays 3 Numerical Examples 4 Concluding Remarks Liu and Vaidyanathan CRB for Sparse Arrays SAM 2016 19 / 20

Concluding remarks Concluding Remarks The proposed CRB expressions for sparse arrays explain why more sources than sensors (D S ) can be identified, and why the CRB stagnates for large SNR and D S. More details can be found in our journal and website. 1 Other recent papers: Koochakzadeh and Pal 2 and by Wang and Nehorai. 3 Future: study the optimal array geoemtry for CRB. Work supported by Office of Naval Research. Thank you! 1 Liu and Vaidyanathan, Digital Signal Proc.,Elsevier, 2016; http://systems.caltech.edu/dsp/students/clliu/crb.html 2 Koochakzadeh and Pal, IEEE Signal Proc. Letter, 2016. 3 Wang and Nehorai, arxiv:1605.03620 [stat.ap], 2016. Liu and Vaidyanathan CRB for Sparse Arrays SAM 2016 20 / 20