Massachusetts Institute of Technology Physics Department Physics 8.20 IAP 2005 Introduction to Special Relativity

Similar documents
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Physics Department

Modern Physics. Third Edition RAYMOND A. SERWAY CLEMENT J. MOSES CURT A. MOYER

Unit- 1 Theory of Relativity

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Physics Department

Chapter 36 The Special Theory of Relativity. Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.

Relativity. An explanation of Brownian motion in terms of atoms. An explanation of the photoelectric effect ==> Quantum Theory

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Physics Department. Midterm

Space, Time and Simultaneity

College Physics B - PHY2054C. Special Relativity 11/10/2014. My Office Hours: Tuesday 10:00 AM - Noon 206 Keen Building.

JF Theoretical Physics PY1T10 Special Relativity

Relativity. Physics April 2002 Lecture 8. Einstein at 112 Mercer St. 11 Apr 02 Physics 102 Lecture 8 1

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Physics Department

Two postulates Relativity of simultaneity Time dilation; length contraction Lorentz transformations Doppler effect Relativistic kinematics

CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity-part 1

PHYSICS - CLUTCH CH 34: SPECIAL RELATIVITY.

CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity

Physics 2D Lecture Slides Lecture 2. Jan. 5, 2010

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Physics Department. Physics 8.20 IAP 2005 Special Relativity January 28, 2005 FINAL EXAM

Chapter 2: The Special Theory of Relativity. A reference fram is inertial if Newton s laws are valid in that frame.

Rotational Mechanics and Relativity --- Summary sheet 1

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Physics Department

8.20 MIT Introduction to Special Relativity IAP 2005 Tentative Outline

College Physics B - PHY2054C. Special & General Relativity 11/12/2014. My Office Hours: Tuesday 10:00 AM - Noon 206 Keen Building.

Aristotle: If a man on top of a mast in a moving ship drops an object, it would fall toward the back of the ship.

Chapter 1. Relativity 1

Introduction to Relativity & Time Dilation

Pass the (A)Ether, Albert?

Extra notes on rela,vity. Wade Naylor

Special Relativity 05/09/2008. Lecture 14 1

Notes - Special Relativity

Chapter-1 Relativity Part I RADIATION

02. Special Relativity: The 2 Postulates and the Michaelson- Morley Experiment

Chapter 26 Special Theory of Relativity

Midterm Solutions. 1 1 = 0.999c (0.2)

Our Dynamic Universe

Light and Relativity

Special Relativity 1

Galilean velocity transformation

Relativity and Modern Physics. From Last Time. Preferred reference frame. Relativity and frames of reference. Galilean relativity. Relative velocities

A100 Exploring the Universe: Black holes. Martin D. Weinberg UMass Astronomy

Topics: Relativity: What s It All About? Galilean Relativity Einstein s s Principle of Relativity Events and Measurements

Announcement. Einstein s Postulates of Relativity: PHYS-3301 Lecture 3. Chapter 2. Sep. 5, Special Relativity

Introduction. Classical vs Modern Physics. Classical Physics: High speeds Small (or very large) distances

Survey of Astrophysics A110

E = mc 2. Inertial Reference Frames. Inertial Reference Frames. The Special Theory of Relativity. Slide 1 / 63. Slide 2 / 63.

Special Relativity: Derivations

Relativity. April 16, 2014 Chapter 35 1

A100H Exploring the Universe: Black holes. Martin D. Weinberg UMass Astronomy

Principle of Relativity

Name the object labelled B and explain its purpose.

dt = p m, (2.1.1) dt = p

Therefore F = ma = ma = F So both observers will not only agree on Newton s Laws, but will agree on the value of F.

Announcements. Muon Lifetime. Lecture 4 Chapter. 2 Special Relativity. SUMMARY Einstein s Postulates of Relativity: EXPERIMENT

The Lorentz Transformations

Lecture 13 Notes: 07 / 20. Invariance of the speed of light

Newtonian or Galilean Relativity

Physics 2203, Fall 2012 Modern Physics

Special Theory of Relativity. PH101 Lec-2

Doppler shift and aberration for spherical electromagnetic waves

A. B. Lahanas University of Athens, Physics Department, Nuclear and Particle Physics Section, Athens , Greece

Pay close attention... because

Before we work on deriving the Lorentz transformations, let's first look at the classical Galilean transformation.

The Theory of Relativity

1st Year Relativity - Notes on Lectures 3, 4 & 5

Kinematics of special relativity

Today in Astronomy 102: relativity, continued

Elements of Physics II

A) n L < 1.0 B) n L > 1.1 C) n L > 1.3 D) n L < 1.1 E) n L < 1.3

Experimental Values of Lorentz Transformations of Mass and Time

2.1 The Ether and the Michelson-Morley Experiment

Einstein s Relativity and Black Holes

Black Holes -Chapter 21

Rb, which had been compressed to a density of 1013

Chapter 3 Special relativity 3.1 About motion

Gravitation and Cosmology

We search for the ether. Next time: The ether is missing Conspiracy? I think not!

Chapter 37. Relativity. PowerPoint Lectures for University Physics, 14th Edition Hugh D. Young and Roger A. Freedman Lectures by Jason Harlow

Chapter 11. Special Relativity

Physics 2D Lecture Slides Sept 29. Vivek Sharma UCSD Physics

PH 253 Exam I Solutions

Physics 2D Lecture Slides Jan 10. Vivek Sharma UCSD Physics

Einstein s Clocks How can identical clocks measure time at different rates? Hermann Karcher, Bonn, Nov 2006

Chapter 26. Relativity

Module 2: Special Theory of Relativity - Basics

Wallace Hall Academy

General Physics I. Lecture 21: Relativistic Energy and Momentum. Prof. WAN, Xin ( 万歆 )

RELATIVITY. The End of Physics? A. Special Relativity. 3. Einstein. 2. Michelson-Morley Experiment 5

Relativity. Overview & Postulates Events Relativity of Simultaneity. Relativity of Time. Relativity of Length Relativistic momentum and energy

7/5. Consequences of the principle of equivalence (#3) 1. Gravity is a manifestation of the curvature of space.

Homework 1: Special Relativity. Reading Assignment. Essential Problems. 1 Pole-in-Barn (Hartle 4-3) 2 Black Hole Entropy and Dimensional Analysis

General Relativity. on the frame of reference!

Relativistic Effects

RELATIVITY. Einstein published two theories of relativity. In The Special Theory. For uniform motion a = 0. In The General Theory

2.4 The Lorentz Transformation

ENTER RELATIVITY THE HELIOCENTRISM VS GEOCENTRISM DEBATE ARISES FROM MATTER OF CHOOSING THE BEST REFERENCE POINT. GALILEAN TRANSFORMATION 8/19/2016

Rethinking the Principles of Relativity. Copyright 2010 Joseph A. Rybczyk

This Week. 9/5/2018 Physics 214 Fall

The interpretation is that gravity bends spacetime and that light follows the curvature of space.

Modern Physics. Relativity: Describes objects moving close to or at the speed of light (spaceships, photons, electrons )

Modern Physics Part 2: Special Relativity

Transcription:

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Physics Department Physics 8.20 IAP 2005 Introduction to Special Relativity Problem Set 1 1. Speeds What fraction of the speed of light does each of the following speeds represent? (If any calculation is required, use Newtonian mechanics; ignore any relativistic effects. In cases where calculation as opposed to unit conversion is required, comment on whether your Newtonian results are good approximations to the correct speed.) (a) A human being, walking at 4 m/sec. (b) The Acela Express (Boston to New York), travelling at 120 miles/hr. (c) A satellite orbiting the Earth in low Earth orbit. The radius of the Earth is 6.4 10 6 m. (d) A proton (or a baseball, for that matter) dropped onto the surface of a white dwarf star from rest at a great distance. A white dwarf star is a compact star with a mass of about 1.4 times the mass of the sun and a radius of about 5,000 km. The mass of the sun is 2.0 10 30 kg. Assume that the proton (or baseball) starts at rest infinitely far from the star. Calculate its kinetic energy when it crashes into the neutron star surface, and then calculate its velocity. (e) A spaceship, starting from rest, accelerated at 1m/sec 2 for 100 years. Note this is about 1/10th the acceleration due to gravity at the surface of the earth. 2. The travels of elementary particles Elementary particles have very short average lifetimes (at least measured on our perceptual scale). In experiments at accelerators the particles are produced and then detected at points away from the point of production. If the rules of Newtonian physics were correct for particles travelling at great speeds, the particles would have to travel much faster than the speed of light in order to go so far before they decay. Assuming that the particle in question lives for the average lifetime of that species, compute its average speed using Newtonian mechanics: (a) A π meson has a lifetime of 2.6 10 8 sec. It is observed 1 kilometers away from its point of production. (b) A Lambda hyperon has a lifetime of 2.6 10 10 sec. It is observed 30 meters away from its point of production. (c) A Λ B baryon has lifetime 1.23 10 12 sec. It is observed 3 millimeters away from its point of production. All of the particles in this problem are built out of quarks. Quarks are the fundamental building blocks of matter they and the gluons that bind them together account for 99.95% of your mass. However, quarks themselves are never seen. Their interactions are so strong that they are permanently confined in groups of three (particles called

MIT 8.20 Special Relativity IAP 2005 2 baryons ) or as a quark and antiquark (particles called mesons ). There are six types of quarks, each with a different mass. They have unusual electromagnetic charges: 2/3 e and 1/3 e. The types of quarks are known as up (u), down (d), strange (s), charm (c), bottom (b) and top (t). The lightest quarks are the u and d. All the others decay into these two by the weak interactions which are responsible for radioactivity. The π meson consists of ud (where the denotes an antiquark). The Λ hyperon consists of uds, and the Λ B consists of udb. We ll have more to say about these during the course. 3. Galilean transformation on a ship Case I A ship is travelling due east at a speed of 30 m/sec. A ball is rolled due north on the deck of the ship at a speed of 10 m/sec relative to the ship. What is its velocity relative to the Earth? If the ball is rolled 60 east of north at a speed of 5 m/sec relative to the ship, what is its velocity relative to the Earth? 4. Galilean transformation on a ship Case II A stone is dropped from rest from the mast of a ship moving with a velocity of 25 m/sec relative to the Earth. Choose the origins of the Earth based ( laboratory ) coordinate frame (Σ) and the coordinate frame in which the ship is at rest (Σ ) such that they coincide with each other and with the stone at the instant t = 0 that the stone is dropped. Choose your coordinate system so that the ship moves along the positive x axis relative to the Earth and the mast points along the positive y direction. Find the position of the stone (a) relative to the ship, and (b) relative to the laboratory after 2.5 seconds. [Remember that the acceleration of gravity is 9.8 m/sec 2.] Show that the results can be related using the Galilean transformation. 5. Frame independence of momentum conservation (a) An observer on the ground watches a collision between two particles whose masses are m 1 and m 2 and finds, by measurement, that momentum is conserved. Use the classical velocity addition theorem to show that an observer on a moving train will also find that momentum is conserved in the collision. (b) Repeat this analysis under the assumption that a transfer of mass from one particle to the other takes place during the collision, the initial masses being m 1 and m 2 and the final masses being m 1 and m 2. Again, assume that the ground observer finds, by measurement, that momentum is conserved. Show that the train observer will also find that momentum is conserved only if mass is also conserved, that is, if m 1 + m 2 = m 1 + m 2.

MIT 8.20 Special Relativity IAP 2005 3 6. Binomial expansion We will be using the binomial expansion often in 8.20. It reads: a a(a 1)(a 2) (1 + ɛ) a = 1 + ɛ + a(a 1) ɛ 2 + ɛ 3 1 2 1 3 2 1 a(a 1)(a 2)(a 3) + ɛ 4 +... (1) 4 3 2 1 This expansion converges when ɛ < 1. (a) For what values of a does the expansion terminate with a finite number of terms? (b) Use eq. (1) to derive an expansion for (a + b) c when b < a. (c) Consider 1/ 1 v 2 /c 2. Write this in the form (1 + ɛ) a and expand it using the binomial expansion and give the first four terms. (d) If v/c = 0.4 how large an error would you make by keeping only the first two terms in part (c)? the first three terms? 7. Numbers for Michelson Morley In the Michelson Morley experiment of 1887, the length, l of each arm of the interferometer was 11 meters, and sodium light of wavelength 5.9 10 7 meters was used. Suppose that the experiment would have revealed any shift larger than 0.0025 fringe. What upper limit does this place on the speed of the Earth through the supposed aether? How does this compare with the speed of the Earth around the Sun? 8. Michelson Morley for a real wind A pilot plans to fly due east from A to B and back again. If u is her airspeed and if l is the distance between A and B, it is clear that her round trip time t 0 if there is no wind will be 2l/u. (a) Suppose, however, that a steady wind of speed v blows from the west. What will the round trip travel time now be, expressed in terms of t 0, u, and v? (b) If the wind is from the south, find the expected round trip travel time, again as a function of t 0, u, and v. (c) Note that these two travel times are not equal. Should they be? Did you make a mistake? (d) In the Michelson Morley experiment, however, the experiment seems to show that (for arms of equal length) the travel times for light are equal; otherwise these experimenters would have found a fringe shift when they rotated their interferometer. What is the essential difference between these two situations?

MIT 8.20 Special Relativity IAP 2005 4 9. Ehrenfest s thought experiment Paul Ehrenfest (1880 1933) proposed the following thought experiment to illustrate the different behavior expected for light under the ether wind hypothesis and under Einstein s second postulate: Imagine yourself seated at the center of a spherical shell of radius 3 10 8 meters, the inner surface being diffusely reflecting. A source at the center of the sphere emits a sharp pulse of light, which travels outward through the darkness with uniform intensity in all directions. Explain what you would expect to see during the three second interval following the pulse under the assumptions that, (a) there is a steady ether wind blowing through the sphere at 100 km/sec, and (b) there is no ether and Einstein s second postulate holds. (c) Discuss the relationship of this thought experiment to the Michelson Morley Experiment. 10. Aberration, before and after Einstein Show that, according to relativity, the classical aberration equation, must be replaced by v tan α classical = c sin α relativity = v c classical theory relativity theory. Thus the ether theory and relativity make different predictions for the aberration of starlight. However the differences are very small. To see this, consider a realistic case. Assume that the Earth s orbital speed is 30 km/sec and take c = 3.00 10 8 m/sec. Find the fractional difference, f α classical α relativity α relativity Note the differences are so small that your calculator may fail to capture the significant figures. Instead use the series expansions: 1 sin 1 x = x + x 3 + 3 x 5 6 40 1 1 tan 1 x = x x 3 + x 5 3 5

MIT 8.20 Special Relativity IAP 2005 5 11. Aberration due to the Earth s rotation In class we discussed the stellar aberration generated by the Earth s motion around the Sun. The rotation of the Earth about its axis also causes stellar aberration. (a) Explain why the amount of stellar aberration generated by the Earth s rotation depends upon the latitude of the observer. (b) For an observer at a given latitude explain why the amount of aberration depends on the compass direction of the star being observed. Compare, for example, the aberration of a star viewed on the eastern or western horizon with one on the northern horizon and with one directly overhead. (c) What is the largest aberration angle (the tilt of the telescope) due to the Earth s rotation alone for an observer a) at the North Pole, b) at the equator, and c) at latitutde 45 north. 12. Weighing the sun (a) Show that M, the mass of the sun, is related to the aberration constant, α (see problem 10) by α 2 c 2 R M = G in which R is the radius of the Earth s orbit (which we assume to be circular) and G is Newton s constant (G = 6.67 10 11 N m/kg 2. Hint: apply Newton s second law to the Earth s motion around the sun. (b) Calcuate M given that α = 20.5 and R = 1.50 10 11 m. 13. Emission theories One of the early responses to the realization that electromagnetism predicts that the speed of light is a constant took the form of emission theories. These theories make the hypothesis that the speed of light is a constant, c, with respect to the source that emits it. They then have to deal with what happens when the emitted light reflects off a mirror what velocity counts then? Here are three versions of emission theories that differ in their predictions of what the speed of light will be upon reflection from a mirror: The original source theory: the speed remains c relative to the original source. The ballistic theory: the speed is originally c relative to the original source, but upon reflection from the mirror it becomes c relative to the mirror. The new source theory: the speed is originally c relative to the original source, but becomes c relative to the mirror image of the source upon reflection.

MIT 8.20 Special Relativity IAP 2005 6 Now suppose that a source of light, S, and a mirror M are moving away from one another. To be explicit, assume that the source is moving to the left with speed u in the laboratory, and a mirror, M is originally moving to the right with speed v. What is the speed of a light beam (as measured in the laboratory) originally emitted by the source after it has been reflected from the mirror according to each of the three theories? According to Einstein s second postulate what would be the the measured speed of a light pulse (either before or after reflection from the mirror) as viewed from i) the lab frame; ii) the rest frame of the mirror; iii) the rest frame of the source. Note: Einstein s theory is not only right, it s simpler! 14. Invariance of the wave equation Starting from Maxwell s equations it is possible to derive a wave equation whose solutions represent electromagnetic waves. The equation, for the electric field, E, is where c is the speed of light. 2 1 2 E(z, t) E(z, t) = 0 (2) z 2 c 2 t 2 (a) Show that E(z, t) = f(z ± ct) is a solution to this equation for any function, f. (b) Explain why this solution represents a wave travelling to the right or left (toward increasing or decreasing z) with speed c. Which sign corresponds to which direction? (c) Show that eq. (2) is not invariant under the Galilean transformation z = z vt, t = t. (d) Show however that eq. (2) is invariant under the Lorentz transformation z = a(z vt), t = a(t vz/c 2 ), where a = 1/ 1 v 2 /c 2. Hint: you may find the chain rule for partial derivatives useful: f(x, t) f(x, t ) x (x, t) f(x, t ) t (x, t) x = + x x t x t t t x t 15. Relativity of simultaneity A plane flies overhead an observer on the Earth. Treat both the Earth and the plane as inertial frames for this problem. The speed of the plane is v. When the plane is overhead a light signal is emitted from the center of the plane. Subsequently it is detected by observer A in the front of the plane and observer B in the rear of the plane. Both observers measure their distance from the center of the plane to be d. (a) Assume the speed of light is c as measured by the observers in the plane. Explain why observers A and B agree that the light signal reaches them simultaneously. How much time does the light take to reach them?

MIT 8.20 Special Relativity IAP 2005 7 (b) Assuming that the speed of light is also c as measured by an observer on the Earth, explain why the Earth bound observer would say that the arrival of the light signal at A and at B were not simultaneous events. 16. A feeling for the Lorentz factor 1 The Lorentz factor, γ = 1 v 2 /c 2 determines the magnitude of many of the most unusual consequences of relativity (time dilation and length contraction, for example). What must an object s velocity be relative to you, the observer, for it s Lorentz factor to be: (a) 1.0001 (b) 1.1 (c) 2 (d) 100 (e) 10 6 17. Inverse Lorentz transformation Suppose two inertial frames are related by a Lorentz transformation: x y z = γ(x vt) = y = z t = γ(t vx/c 2 ) Solve for x, y, z, t in terms of x, y, z, t and show that the transformation is identical except for v v. 18. Lorentz transformation in an arbitrary direction Suppose two inertial frames, Σ and Σ move such that their coordinate axes are parallel, their origins coincide at t = t = 0, and the origin of Σ is observed to move with velocity v in Σ. Starting from the form of the Lorentz transformation when the relative motion is along a coordinate axis, derive the Lorentz transformation relating x, y, z, t to x, y, z, t. [Hint: it will be useful to decompose x into x = vˆ(ˆ v x) and x = x x.]