Special Relativity: Derivations
|
|
- Kelly Erick Ford
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Special Relativity: Derivations Exploring formulae in special relativity Introduction: Michelson-Morley experiment In the 19 th century, physicists thought that since sound waves travel through air, light waves must travel through a medium as well. They called this medium Aether. It was a medium that was hypothesized to be what light require in order to move through the vacuum of space. How else could light waves move through unless there was some medium there? Aether, as they assumed, is an invisible nothingness that permeates space. Its only physical property is that it only allows light to propagate through. Once precise measurements of the speed of light became possible, testing the predicted effect of the aether on the speed light became possible as well. The earth orbits the sun at about km/h. If the light travels through aether, then as the earth moves through the aether, the speed of light should be different when going with the aether or going perpendicular through it.however, relative to the speed of light, the earth s orbit around the sun is rather slow. Therefore the level of precision needed for this experiment must be extremely high. Nevertheless, in 1877, Albert A. Michelson and Edward W. Morley, two American scientists, devised an apparatus that would detect even tiny differences in speed between two beams of light. It was called the interferometer. Light from one source is split into two directions through a half silver two-way mirror. These beams are reflected between other mirrors and recombined into a single beam. When two light beams recombine, an interference pattern will occur from the superposition of the waves. The experiment was repeated many times, and each time the direction of the light beam. Therefore it is expected that the interference pattern, resulting from the two light beams sent out from different direction, will be different, showing that the light beams in each case are of different speeds. However, Michelson and Morley never detected such a difference, and the existence of aether was never proved. The issue remained unsolved for many years until Einstein came along, and proposed, altogether with his theory of relativity, that the speed of light is always the same regardless of the speed of the light source.
2 Special relativity In an attempt to explain and simplify the theory of special relativity, I will only rely on two postulates to derive the properties of space-time with what I believe to be a systematic approach and eventually we shall derive arguably the most famous equation in physics, E = mc 2. Postulates: 1. The laws of physics are the same in all inertial (non accelerating) frames of reference 2. The speed of light in vacuum is a constant, and has a value c in all inertial frames of reference The theory of special relativity is a generally accepted theory regarding the relationship between space and time. The first postulate implies that in any reference frame, the physical law v=x/t, for instance, remains true. It does not imply, however, that the distances or the times measured would be the same in different frames (don t assume time is always a constant!). The implications of the second postulate also contradict what many have thought to be true. Consider a simple experiment (I) below. A person A travelling on a train at speed v relative to the platform fires a bullet. In A s frame, the speed of the bullet was measured to be w. Another person, B, who is standing on the platform, measures the speed of the bullet. From everyday experience, we would assume that the speed of the bullet from B s frame would be equal to v+w. Consider however, another scenario, where A fires a laser (light) beam instead of a bullet, travelling at speed c in A s frame. Many would assume that B will measure the speed of the laser beam to be v + c. But that is not the case! According to the second postulate, the speed of light (say, its speed in air is roughly equal to its speed in vacuum) has a value c in all inertial frames. Therefore, the speed of the laser beam measured by B will still be equal to c, not v + c. Thus, we can conclude that the rule for combining velocities breaks down when considering the speed of light, and we cannot simply add them to arrive at the solution. Note, also, that the velocity v+c cannot be achieved, as nothing can travel faster than the speed of light (later on).
3 Lorentz interval We will start with a little bit of basic mathematics. Consider another example (II) where there are three observers. One observer, A, is standing on the train travelling at speed v relative to the platform. Here, A observed a laser beam being fired vertically from the bottom of the train to the top where it is detected by the receiver. B, who is standing on the platform, and C, who is on another train travelling in opposite direction, also observed this. Let the speed of A relative to C be v. Denote E1 to be the event when the laser was fired, and E2 to be the event when it is detected. For A, let t be the time interval between the two events. The vertical height of the train, as v=s/t, is ct, which is the spatial distance between E1 and E2. B, however, observes the two events differently, as shown below. Let the time interval between E1 and E2 be t. As for C, as the train is moving in opposite direction, C s observation will be somewhat similar to B, but with a larger distance (as in C s frame, A moves faster). Denote the time interval of the two events t. In B frame, B must measure the speed of light beam to be c, therefore the spatial separation between the two events is ct. Then we can construct a vertical line down from where E2 took place, forming a right angled triangle. Knowing that in B s frame, the train travels at speed v horizontally, then the horizontal distance is equal to v t = x and the vertical distance is ct, as from before, as the train only moves horizontally, we can regard that vertically, the train is stationary with respect to the platform, therefore the train and the platform is vertically in a similar inertial frames. As for C, the same concept applies as shown in the diagram. From Pythagoras theorem, (ct ) 2 (v t ) 2 (ct) 2 = 0 and also (ct ) 2 (v t ) 2 (ct) 2 = 0. Generalising this
4 implies that for any frame of reference observing the two events, (ct n ) 2 [(v n t n ) 2 + (ct) 2 ] is always invariant. Note that (v n t n ) 2 + (ct) 2 is the square of the space separation between the two events, and (ct n ) 2 is the square of c x time separation of the two events. This is called the spacetime interval, or the Lorentz interval. Generally, the space-time interval is written as (Interval) 2 = [(c x time separation] 2 [space separation] 2 However, this still does not prove that the interval is always invariant, because in this thought experiment we are moving at the speed of light c, in which the interval in any frame is 0. I will come to discuss this later on. Lorentz factor From the equation (ct ) 2 (v t ) 2 (ct) 2 = 0, we can rewrite this as (ct ) 2 (v t ) 2 = (ct) 2 which solves to (t ) 2 (1- v 2 /c 2 ) = t 2. Take the square root of the equation and move the factor to the other side gives t = γt This factor γ is called the Lorentz factor. Time dilation and length contraction Where γ = 1/ 1 v2 c 2 The equation t = γt presents a significant implication. t represents the outside observer i.e. platform and t represents the true observer, i.e. train. It implies that the times measured by observers moving at different speed will not be the same! Of course, this seems absurd in our daily life, because we are always moving very slow relative to light, and the factor γ becomes roughly 1 at slow speed. However, if we are on a rocket travelling to Alpha Centauri at speed 0.6c compared to earth (III), the time t measured by observers on Earth for us to reach the star will be 1.25 times longer than the actual time t elapsed in the rocket (1/0.8 = 1.25). This effect is called time dilation (moving clocks tick slower!) Note further, that from theory of relativity, the observer in the rocket would see that it is actually Alpha Centauri that is moving towards him at speed 0.6c relative to the rocket (assuming that Alpha Centauri is stationary relative to Earth). Denote L to be the distance from Earth to Alpha Centauri measured by earth observer, and L for the distance measured by the rocket observer. From the first postulate, we may assume the equation for velocity holds true, therefore 0.6c = L /t and 0.6c = L/t. From this, L /t = L/t. Substituting t gives L = γl : the equation which represents length contraction, implying that the distances measured by observers in different frames of reference will not agree. Length contraction is the phenomenon of a decrease in length or distance as measured by an observer who is traveling at
5 any non-zero velocity relative to the object. Thus, the observer in the rocket will record a distance that is smaller than the observer on Earth, as it is moving relative to the distance between the Earth and the star. Addition of parallel velocities Now that we have grasped the idea of time dilation, the law of addition of velocities can be solved using another thought experiment (IV). A, standing on a platform, fires two successive bullets at a target held by B on a train travelling at a constant speed v. For A, the bullet was fired at speed u. We shall let the time interval, measured by a clock on the platform as observed by A, between the firing of the bullets be t g, and the time interval between the first bullets hitting the target be t t. At time 0, the target is located directly in front of the gun, being hit by the first bullet immediately after it was fired. Therefore we can equate the distance travelled by the second bullet with the distance travelled by the train: u( t t t g ) = vt t By making t g the subject gives: 1) t g = t t (1-v/u) Next, we denote the time interval between the gun firing the bullets, measured by a clock on the train to be t g, therefore the relationship between t r and t r follows from the equation of time dilation, as the train is moving away from the gun: Therefore, from 1) and 2), 2) t g = γt g 3) t g = γt t (1-v/u) Switching to B s frame, B sees A and the gun moving away at speed v. We will denote w to be the speed of the bullet as observed by B and t t to be the time interval of the bullets hitting the
6 target, and by equating the distance travelled by the second bullet with the distance travelled by the machine gun during the firing of the two bullets: By making t t the subject gives: w( t t t g ) = vt g 4) t t = t g (1 + v/w) Again we can use time dilation equation to relate t t and t t : Therefore, from 3) and 4), Multiplying 3) and 6) gives 5) t t = γt t 6) t t = γt g (1 + v/w) γ 2 = (1-v/u) (1 + v/w) After several algebraic manipulations, we arrive at the law of addition of velocities: 7) u = (v+w)/(1+ vw/c 2 ) From this expression, we can understand that for relatively low speeds, the denominator becomes approximately 1. Therefore the matter comes down to simply adding v + w. However, when one or both of the speeds tend to the speed of light, the resulting velocity u also becomes larger than the two, but yet it never becomes faster than c. The addition law of relative velocities was derived from many different ways; many required the use of Lorentz transformation. Another very simplistic way of deriving this without the use of Lorentz transformation was proposed by David Mermin in his book It s about time. However, it requires the assumption of the fact that a fraction length of an object is invariant regardless of different frames: a statement which seemed obvious but not yet proved. Therefore, I believe that this thought experiment involving moving bullets and target is the best approach, as it only relies on the properties of space-time which we have derived from the two postulates. Lorentz transformations
7 Continuing from the previous thought experiment (III) involving a rocket journey to Alpha Centauri, we can derive the Lorentz transformation: two equations defining how the speed of light was observed to be independent of the reference frame. In this case, observer A is on Earth and observer B is on the rocket. The clocks on the Earth and the rocket are synchronised when t = t = 0, at the instant when the rocket leaves the Earth. In Earth s frame, the rocket s speed as measured by observer A is equal to v. Therefore at one instant time t the rocket will have travelled a distance vt. Let the coordinate of Alpha Centauri in Earth frame be x. In the rocket s frame, the observer B sees the Earth and Alpha Centauri moving at speed v. Let the coordinate of Alpha Centauri at time t in the rocket frame be x ; the time which the Earth has travelled a distance vt. From the equation of length contraction, note that as the rocket is moving relative Earth, the
8 actual distance measured from the rocket to Alpha Centauri by observer B at an instant time t will be contracted as seen by observer A. Also, the distance measured from the Earth to Alpha Centauri by observer A at an instant time t will be contracted as seen by observer B. Therefore we can draw two diagrams showing the distances of each frame as shown below: From this we can conclude that x = (x /γ) + vt Hence, 8) x = γ( x vt ) As for the rocket frame; x/γ = x + vt Therefore, 9) x = γ( x + vt ) Equations 8) and 9) are the two Lorentz transformation equations for space. From these two, solving the simultaneous equations for t and t (the maths is quite complicated and dull), by eliminating x and then x, yields the following Lorentz transformation equations for time: 10) t = γ( t vx/c 2 ) 11) t = γ( t + vx /c 2 ) This method of deriving the Lorentz transformation is truly captivating, because it does not rely on the assumption of linear transformations. We have avoided the derivations of the Lorentz- Einstein transformations that start with their guessed shape, imposing the condition of linearity: the idea which I find difficult to grasp. I believe that this method is a non-traditional approach to special relativity and would be simpler for the readers to understand fully. Addition of relativistic perpendicular velocities Going back to the rocket journey (III), we can rewrite the Lorentz equations for all directions as below. The distances in the y and z direction must remain the same in both frames, as the relative motion is only in the x direction. x = γ( x - vt ) y = y z = z t = γ( t - vx/c 2 )
9 Suppose at one instant the observer in the rocket fires a bullet from the bottom vertically to the top of the rocket. The observer on Earth measured the velocity of the bullet in the y direction to be u y as measured from Earth s frame, and sees that the rocket is moving at speed v relative to him in the x direction. The velocity of the bullet (y direction) in the rocket frame is u y therefore u y = y / t. For an observer on Earth, he will see u y = y / t and u x = x / t. From this we substitute the value from the Lorentz equation which gives: u y = y / t = y / γ( t - ux/c 2 ) = y / tγ(1 + vx/tc 2 ) 12) u y = u y / γ(1 + vu x /c 2 ) Equation 12) represents the relativistic addition of velocities for perpendicular velocities (this also applies to z plane). Note that the equation also relies on the velocity in the x direction. From this, we are now able to calculate the resulting velocity from combined velocities with any given directions. Lorentz Interval proved The importance of the Lorentz transformations is that it allows us to prove arguably the most important property of space-time: the Lorentz interval. As mentioned before, the interval is an invariant regardless of reference frame and it is in the form of (Interval) 2 = [(c x time separation] 2 [space separation] 2 The interval is often denoted the symbol τ. It is important to realise that for some two events, the value of (ct) 2 x 2 may be negative, and this would be a problem as τ 2 cannot be smaller than 0. In another case, the value may also be equal to 0, as we have previously encountered. When the value of (ct) 2 x 2 > 0, the interval is timelike. When it is negative it is spacelike, and when it is equal to 0, it is light like. When this value is negative, we must multiply the expression by -1, in order for the interval to have a solution. A spacelike interval describes two events for which an inertial frame can be found such that the two events are simultaneous. It also implies that an observer cannot physically be presented at both events, because otherwise he must be travelling faster than light speed, which we shall come later on to prove that it is
10 impossible. As no information can be transmitted faster than light speed, one of the two events having spacelike interval could not have caused the other to happen, and therefore they are completely independent of one another. In this experiment, we shall let event E 1 to be the instant the rocket leaves the Earth when t = t = 0; E 2 to be an explosion on Alpha Centauri as measured at time t and t on Earth and the rocket, respectively. This way, the time and space separation between the events will be x and t for Earth frame, and x and t for rocket frame. We now show that the Lorentz interval is an invariant by substituting values from the Lorentz equations:
11 Relativistic mass and Momentum Now we have derived the law of addition of velocities, it may be shown that the classical law of momentum poses a problem. Consider two rocks with the same mass colliding with speed 0.9c. Suppose that the rocks stick together after the impact, it would be obvious that both of the rocks would collide and remain at rest in Earth s frame (total momentum = 0). However, if an observer is in one of the rock s frame, whose speed is 0.9c relative to a ground observer, he would measure the second rock speed to be 0.994c (from relativistic addition law). In accordance with observer in Earth s frame, the observer moving with the rock should observe the rocks after the collision to move at 0.9c relative to him. However, from the classical momentum law, mu 1 + mu 2 = 2mv, and this results in v being equal to 0.497c, instead of 0.994c. Therefo re, we must conclude that the equation for momentum only holds true when v<<c, and must account for this obvious contradiction. Consider a similar scenario when two balls which have the same mass m 0 when at rest in the same frame. The two balls are then observed by A to be travelling both at speed w but in opposite direction, colliding and sticking after the impact. As the two balls are moving at the same speed relative to B, the masses of the two balls as measured by B can be considered to be equal (m w ). We will not assume that the masses measured are equal in different frames. From the conservation of momentum, we can conclude that the total momentum is zero, and the two balls would remain at rest after the impact. Observer B who is stationary relative to the left ball sees the right ball moving at speed v and
12 collides with the left ball at rest. After the collision, the two masses stick and would be observed to travel at speed w (principle of relativity). From the equation of conservation of momentum; From the law of addition of velocity; m v v = (m 0 + m v )w v = 2w / (1+w 2 /c 2 ) Solving the simultaneous equations does seem complicated and dull. Nevertheless, the workings are shown below, substituting both v and w. Simplifying m v and w into single terms Making w the subject from the equation
13 Substituting for w (finally..) The final result gives m v = γm 0. This is a very important result, as it implies that the mass of an object is dependent on its velocity. The term gamma increases without limit as the velocity approaches c, signifying that the mass of the ball tends to infinity as the object approaches the speed of light. For the relativistic momentum, multiplying both sides by v gives the following equation: m v v = γm 0 v Going back to our contradictory experiment with rocks, we now apply the true relativistic momentum equation. γ'm 0 (0.994c) = γ(2m 0 ) v 13.4(0.994c) = 2γv = γv v 2 = (3.96c 2 /4.96) v = 0.9c This answer now agrees with observer in another frame and therefore this equation for momentum is no longer contradictory. Relativistic Energy The equation for momentum is no longer mv, therefore the force law, defined as the rate of change of momentum, must also be written as F = γm 0 v / t. This also has an effect on the work done on an object, expressed as F dx
14 Suppose that a varying force is exerted on an object with rest mass m 0 with initial velocity zero, and the all of the work done on the object is converted to its kinetic energy. We can write the equation as K.E. = F dx For classical mechanics, the kinetic energy may be derived from the integral as shown below, and the result, as expected, is mv 2 /2.
15 The mass, however, isn t constant with its speed, therefore instead we must differentiate with respect to the true law of momentum:
16 This gives the formula for relativistic kinetic energy, which looks nothing similar to the classical one. However, when the speed of an object is very much smaller than the speed of light, the formula can be shown to approximate to mv 2 /2. Note that the value γm 0 c depends on the speed of the object, whereas m 0 c does not. We know that the total energy of an object must equal to the sum of its rest energy and its kinetic energy. Therefore we may consider rest energy, which would not depend on its speed, to be mc 2, and we have arrived at the infamous formula relating mass and its rest energy: E = m 0 c 2 The formula can also be shown to equal to Rest energy 2 = Total energy 2 (momentum x c) 2 which is written as E 2 p 2 c 2. The rest energy must remain the same in all inertial frames (because it is when at rest in that frame). Thus we have arrived at another invariant, The derivations of properties of space-time from the two postulates do not require a lot of mathematical background. However, it does prove to consist of algebraic manipulations and imaginative thought experiments. Although the sequence of these derivations may seem unconventional and systematic, it seemed to be the approach which poses the least confusion and assumptions. This, however, shows only the formulas for space-time properties with a few explanations to their effects. The reader may then be tempted to apply the concept to different thought experiments and problems, which would be very helpful and improve their understanding of these derived formulae.
17 Reference: Mr Hearn Spacetime physics by Taylor Wheeler Black holes: Introduction to General Relativity by Taylor Wheeler It s about Time by David Mermin
Special Relativity 05/09/2008. Lecture 14 1
How Fast Are You Moving Right Now? Special Relativity Einstein messes with space and time 0 m/s relative to your chair 400 m/s relative to earth center (rotation) 30,000 m/s relative to the sun (orbit)
More informationChapter 36 The Special Theory of Relativity. Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.
Chapter 36 The Special Theory of Relativity Units of Chapter 36 Galilean Newtonian Relativity The Michelson Morley Experiment Postulates of the Special Theory of Relativity Simultaneity Time Dilation and
More informationRelativity. An explanation of Brownian motion in terms of atoms. An explanation of the photoelectric effect ==> Quantum Theory
Relativity Relativity In 1905 Albert Einstein published five articles in Annalen Der Physik that had a major effect upon our understanding of physics. They included:- An explanation of Brownian motion
More informationModern Physics. Third Edition RAYMOND A. SERWAY CLEMENT J. MOSES CURT A. MOYER
Modern Physics Third Edition RAYMOND A. SERWAY CLEMENT J. MOSES CURT A. MOYER 1 RELATIVITY 1.1 Special Relativity 1.2 The Principle of Relativity, The Speed of Light 1.3 The Michelson Morley Experiment,
More informationE = mc 2. Inertial Reference Frames. Inertial Reference Frames. The Special Theory of Relativity. Slide 1 / 63. Slide 2 / 63.
Slide 1 / 63 The Special Theory of Relativity E = mc 2 Inertial Reference Frames Slide 2 / 63 Newton's laws are only valid in inertial reference frames: n inertial reference frame is one which is not accelerating
More informationTherefore F = ma = ma = F So both observers will not only agree on Newton s Laws, but will agree on the value of F.
Classical Physics Inertial Reference Frame (Section 5.2): a reference frame in which an object obeys Newton s Laws, i.e. F = ma and if F = 0 (object does not interact with other objects), its velocity
More information2.1 The Ether and the Michelson-Morley Experiment
Chapter. Special Relativity Notes: Some material presented in this chapter is taken The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Vol. I by R. P. Feynman, R. B. Leighton, and M. Sands, Chap. 15 (1963, Addison-Wesley)..1
More informationClass 1: Special Relativity
Class 1: Special Relativity In this class we will review some important concepts in Special Relativity, that will help us build up to the General theory Class 1: Special Relativity At the end of this session
More informationModern Physics Part 2: Special Relativity
Modern Physics Part 2: Special Relativity Last modified: 23/08/2018 Links Relative Velocity Fluffy and the Tennis Ball Fluffy and the Car Headlights Special Relativity Relative Velocity Example 1 Example
More information2.6 Invariance of the Interval
2.6 Invariance of the Interval Note. In this section, we define a quantity called the interval between two events which is invariant under a change of spacetime coordinates from one inertial frame to another
More informationChapter 2: The Special Theory of Relativity. A reference fram is inertial if Newton s laws are valid in that frame.
Chapter 2: The Special Theory of Relativity What is a reference frame? A reference fram is inertial if Newton s laws are valid in that frame. If Newton s laws are valid in one reference frame, they are
More informationJF Theoretical Physics PY1T10 Special Relativity
JF Theoretical Physics PY1T10 Special Relativity 12 Lectures (plus problem classes) Prof. James Lunney Room: SMIAM 1.23, jlunney@tcd.ie Books Special Relativity French University Physics Young and Freedman
More informationRelativity. Physics April 2002 Lecture 8. Einstein at 112 Mercer St. 11 Apr 02 Physics 102 Lecture 8 1
Relativity Physics 102 11 April 2002 Lecture 8 Einstein at 112 Mercer St. 11 Apr 02 Physics 102 Lecture 8 1 Physics around 1900 Newtonian Mechanics Kinetic theory and thermodynamics Maxwell s equations
More informationNotes - Special Relativity
Notes - Special Relativity 1.) The problem that needs to be solved. - Special relativity is an interesting branch of physics. It often deals with looking at how the laws of physics pan out with regards
More informationSpace, Time and Simultaneity
PHYS419 Lecture 11: Space, Time & Simultaneity 1 Space, Time and Simultaneity Recall that (a) in Newtonian mechanics ( Galilean space-time ): time is universal and is agreed upon by all observers; spatial
More informationRotational Mechanics and Relativity --- Summary sheet 1
Rotational Mechanics and Relativity --- Summary sheet 1 Centre of Mass 1 1 For discrete masses: R m r For continuous bodies: R dm i i M M r body i Static equilibrium: the two conditions for a body in static
More informationSpecial Relativity. Asaf Pe er The Michelson - Morley experiment
Special Relativity Asaf Pe er 1 December 4, 2013 1. The Michelson - Morley experiment 1 By the late 1800 s, the wave nature of light was well established, with diffraction experiments carried by Thomas
More informationUnit- 1 Theory of Relativity
Unit- 1 Theory of Relativity Frame of Reference The Michelson-Morley Experiment Einstein s Postulates The Lorentz Transformation Time Dilation and Length Contraction Addition of Velocities Experimental
More informationCHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity-part 1
CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity-part 1 2.1 The Apparent Need for Ether 2.2 The Michelson-Morley Experiment 2.3 Einstein s Postulates 2.4 The Lorentz Transformation 2.5 Time Dilation and Length Contraction
More informationChapter 26. Relativity
Chapter 26 Relativity Time Dilation The vehicle is moving to the right with speed v A mirror is fixed to the ceiling of the vehicle An observer, O, at rest in this system holds a laser a distance d below
More informationMotivation. The Speed of Light. The Speed of Light. In Water Things Look Like This. Introduction to Special and General Relativity
Introduction to Special and General Relativity Motivation: Michelson-Morley Experiment Induction versus Force Law The Basics Events Principles of Relativity Giving up on absolute space and time What Follows
More informationLecture Outline Chapter 29. Physics, 4 th Edition James S. Walker. Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Lecture Outline Chapter 29 Physics, 4 th Edition James S. Walker Chapter 29 Relativity Units of Chapter 29 The Postulates of Special Relativity The Relativity of Time and Time Dilation The Relativity of
More informationRethinking the Principles of Relativity. Copyright 2010 Joseph A. Rybczyk
Rethinking the Principles of Relativity Copyright 2010 Joseph A. Rybczyk Abstract An analysis of all of the principles involved in light propagation lead to the discovery that the relativistic principle
More informationLecture 8 : Special Theory of Relativity
Lecture 8 : Special Theory of Relativity The speed of light problem Einstein s postulates Time dilation 9/23/10 1 Sidney Harris I: THE SPEED OF LIGHT PROBLEM Recap Relativity tells us how to relate measurements
More informationChapter 26 Special Theory of Relativity
Chapter 26 Special Theory of Relativity Classical Physics: At the end of the 19 th century, classical physics was well established. It seems that the natural world was very well explained. Newtonian mechanics
More informationTest 3 results B A. Grades posted in Learn
Test 3 results Grades posted in Learn D C B A End of the Semester approaches - make sure that your test, clicker and homework grades are what you think they should be on Learn F Clicker Question: What
More informationPHYSICS - CLUTCH CH 34: SPECIAL RELATIVITY.
!! www.clutchprep.com CONCEPT: INERTIAL REFERENCE FRAMES A reference frame is a coordinate system that you make measurements in, and there are two types: - Inertial reference frames, which move at velocity
More informationWallace Hall Academy
Wallace Hall Academy CfE Higher Physics Unit 1 - Universe Notes Name 1 Newton and Gravity Newton s Thought Experiment Satellite s orbit as an Application of Projectiles Isaac Newton, as well as giving
More informationIntroduction. Classical vs Modern Physics. Classical Physics: High speeds Small (or very large) distances
Introduction Classical vs Modern Physics High speeds Small (or very large) distances Classical Physics: Conservation laws: energy, momentum (linear & angular), charge Mechanics Newton s laws Electromagnetism
More informationRELATIVITY. Special Relativity
RELATIVITY Special Relativity FROM WARMUP How does special relativity differ from general? Special relativity deals with inertial reference frames. General relativity deals with gravity and acceleration
More informationName the object labelled B and explain its purpose.
PhysicsAndMathsTutor.com 1 1. The diagram represents the Michelson-Morley interferometer. surface-silvered mirror M 1 l 1 extended source of monochromatic light B surface-silvered mirror M 2 A l 2 viewing
More informationMidterm Solutions. 1 1 = 0.999c (0.2)
Midterm Solutions 1. (0) The detected muon is seen km away from the beam dump. It carries a kinetic energy of 4 GeV. Here we neglect the energy loss and angular scattering of the muon for simplicity. a.
More informationChapter 37. Relativity. PowerPoint Lectures for University Physics, 14th Edition Hugh D. Young and Roger A. Freedman Lectures by Jason Harlow
Chapter 37 Relativity PowerPoint Lectures for University Physics, 14th Edition Hugh D. Young and Roger A. Freedman Lectures by Jason Harlow Learning Goals for Chapter 37 Looking forward at why different
More informationNewtonian or Galilean Relativity
Relativity Eamples 1. What is the velocity of an electron in a 400 kv transmission electron microscope? What is the velocity in the 6 GeV CESR particle accelerator?. If one million muons enter the atmosphere
More informationPhysics. Special Relativity
Physics Special Relativity 1 Albert Einstein, the high school dropout and patent office clerk published his ideas on Special Relativity in 1905. 2 Special vs. General Relativity Special Relativity deals
More informationRELATIVITY. Einstein published two theories of relativity. In The Special Theory. For uniform motion a = 0. In The General Theory
RELATIVITY Einstein published two theories of relativity In 1905 The Special Theory For uniform motion a = 0 In 1916 The General Theory For non-uniform motion a 0. First we will discuss The Special Theory
More informationRelativity Albert Einstein: Brownian motion. fi atoms. Photoelectric effect. fi Quantum Theory On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies
Relativity 1905 - Albert Einstein: Brownian motion fi atoms. Photoelectric effect. fi Quantum Theory On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies fi The Special Theory of Relativity The Luminiferous Ether Hypothesis:
More informationConsequences of special relativity.
PHYS419 Lecture 12 Consequences of special relativity 1 Consequences of special relativity. The length of moving objects. Recall that in special relativity, simultaneity depends on the frame of reference
More informationGeneral Physics I. Lecture 21: Relativistic Energy and Momentum. Prof. WAN, Xin ( 万歆 )
General Physics I Lecture 21: Relativistic Energy and Momentum Prof. WAN, Xin ( 万歆 ) xinwan@zju.edu.cn http://zimp.zju.edu.cn/~xinwan/ Outline Relativistic velocity, momentum, and energy The mass-energy
More informationRelativity. April 16, 2014 Chapter 35 1
Relativity April 16, 2014 Chapter 35 1 Announcements! Next week: Review of entire course, no exam! Final exam Wednesday, April 30, 8-10 PM Location: BPS 1410 (this room) Comprehensive, covers material
More informationKinematics of special relativity
Chapter 2 Kinematics of special relativity 2.1 Special Relativity 2.1.1 Principles of Relativity Einstein postulated that there was still Galilean invariance, i. e. all uniformly moving observers had the
More informationMichael Fowler, UVa Physics, 12/1/07. Momentum has Direction
Michael Fowler, UVa Physics, //07 Momentum has Direction As we discussed in the last lecture, even before Newton formulated his laws, Descartes, with a little help from Huygens, had discovered a deep dynamical
More informationThe True Nature of the Special Relativity Light Clock. Copyright 2012 Joseph A. Rybczyk
The True Nature of the Special Relativity Light Clock Copyright 2012 Joseph A. Rybczyk Abstract It is generally believed that the light clock typically associated with special relativity correlates the
More informationLecture 12 Notes, Electromagnetic Theory II Dr. Christopher S. Baird, faculty.uml.edu/cbaird University of Massachusetts Lowell
Lecture 12 Notes, Electromagnetic Theory II Dr. Christopher S. Baird, faculty.uml.edu/cbaird University of Massachusetts Lowell 1. Velocities in Special Relativity - As was done in Galilean relativity,
More informationCHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity
CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity 2.1 The Apparent Need for Ether 2.2 The Michelson-Morley Experiment 2.3 Einstein s Postulates 2.4 The Lorentz Transformation 2.5 Time Dilation and Length Contraction
More informationTech Notes 4 and 5. Let s prove that invariance of the spacetime interval the hard way. Suppose we begin with the equation
Tech Notes 4 and 5 Tech Notes 4 and 5 Let s prove that invariance of the spacetime interval the hard way. Suppose we begin with the equation (ds) 2 = (dt) 2 (dx) 2. We recall that the coordinate transformations
More informationEinstein and his theory of Special Relativity (1905) General relativity came later and deals more with gravity (1915) 07 relativity.
Einstein and his theory of Special Relativity (1905) General relativity came later and deals more with gravity (1915) Groundwork for Einstein's theory was laid out my Michelson and Morley with their interferometer
More informationLecture 3 and 4. Relativity of simultaneity. Lorentz-Einstein transformations
Lecture 3 and 4 Relativity of simultaneity Lorentz-Einstein transformations Relativity of Simultaneity If we use this method of synchronising clocks, we find that simultaneity is relative, not absolute.
More informationAppendices. Chapter Appendix A: Qualitative relativity questions
Chapter 6 Appendices Special Relativity, For the Enthusiastic Beginner (Draft version, December 2016) Copyright 2016, David Morin, morin@physics.harvard.edu 6.1 Appendix A: Qualitative relativity questions
More informationSimultaneity, Time Dilation, and Length Contraction Using Minkowski Diagrams and Lorentz Transformations
Simultaneity, Time Dilation, and Length Contraction Using Minkowski Diagrams and Lorentz Transformations Dr. Russell L. Herman January 25, 2008 (modified: January 17, 2018) Abstract In these notes we present
More informationOur Dynamic Universe
North Berwick High School Higher Physics Department of Physics Unit 1 Our Dynamic Universe Section 5 Special Relativity Section 5 Special Relativity Note Making Make a dictionary with the meanings of any
More informationRelativistic Boats: an explanation of special relativity. Brianna Thorpe, Dr. Michael Dugger
height Relativistic Boats: an explanation of special relativity Brianna Thorpe, Dr. Michael Dugger Time Dilation Relativity is all about your point of view. We are working with the speed of light and some
More informationAristotle: If a man on top of a mast in a moving ship drops an object, it would fall toward the back of the ship.
Aristotle: If a man on top of a mast in a moving ship drops an object, it would fall toward the back of the ship. Aristotle Galileo v Galileo: The object would land at the base of the mast. Therefore,
More informationThe Lorentz Transformation
The Lorentz Transformation During the fourth week of the course, we spent some time discussing how the coordinates of two different reference frames were related to each other. Now that we know about the
More informationConsequences of special relativity.
PHYS419 Lecture 12 Consequences of special relativity 1 Consequences of special relativity. The length of moving objects. Recall that in special relativity, simultaneity depends on the frame of reference
More informationBefore we work on deriving the Lorentz transformations, let's first look at the classical Galilean transformation.
Background The curious "failure" of the Michelson-Morley experiment in 1887 to determine the motion of the earth through the aether prompted a lot of physicists to try and figure out why. The first attempt
More informationToday in Astronomy 102: relativity, continued
Today in Astronomy 10: relativity, continued Einstein s procedures and results on the special theory of relativity. Formulas and numerical examples of the effects of length contraction, time dilation,
More informationPhysics 2D Lecture Slides Lecture 2. Jan. 5, 2010
Physics 2D Lecture Slides Lecture 2 Jan. 5, 2010 Lecture 1: Relativity Describing a Physical Phenomenon Event (s) Observer (s) Frame(s) of reference (the point of View! ) Inertial Frame of Reference Accelerated
More informationLecture 13 Notes: 07 / 20. Invariance of the speed of light
Lecture 13 Notes: 07 / 20 Invariance of the speed of light The Michelson-Morley experiment, among other experiments, showed that the speed of light in vacuum is a universal constant, as predicted by Maxwell's
More informationChapter 3 Special relativity 3.1 About motion
Chapter 3 Special relativity 3.1 About motion Learning objectives Explain what is meant by absolute motion and relative motion. Describe the experimental evidence that all motion is relative. Discuss whether
More informationPostulates of Special Relativity
Relativity Relativity - Seen as an intricate theory that is necessary when dealing with really high speeds - Two charged initially stationary particles: Electrostatic force - In another, moving reference
More informationSpecial Relativity 1
Special Relativity 1 Special Relativity: A Summary Caitlyn Edwards Dr. Gan Modern Physics November 2017 Special Relativity 2 Abstract The physics of Einstein s theory of special relativity differs dramatically
More informationCollege Physics B - PHY2054C. Special & General Relativity 11/12/2014. My Office Hours: Tuesday 10:00 AM - Noon 206 Keen Building.
Special College - PHY2054C Special & 11/12/2014 My Office Hours: Tuesday 10:00 AM - Noon 206 Keen Building Outline Special 1 Special 2 3 4 Special Galilean and Light Galilean and electromagnetism do predict
More informationA F/4 B F/8 C 2F D 4F E 8F. Answer: Because F M A. /r 2 or eight times what it was 8F. Answer:
Test 7 Section A 2 Core short answer questions: 50 marks Section B 2 Detailed studies short answer questions: 120 marks Suggested time: 90 2100 minutes Section A: Core short answer questions Specific instructions
More informationMassachusetts Institute of Technology Physics Department Physics 8.20 IAP 2005 Introduction to Special Relativity
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Physics Department Physics 8.20 IAP 2005 Introduction to Special Relativity Problem Set 1 1. Speeds What fraction of the speed of light does each of the following
More informationPHYS 270-SPRING 2011 Dennis Papadopoulos LECTURE # 20 RELATIVITY I NEWTONIAN RELATIVITY GALILEAN TRANSFORMATIONS SIMULTANEITY APRIL 21, 2011
PHYS 270-SPRING 2011 Dennis Papadopoulos LECTURE # 20 RELATIVITY I NEWTONIAN RELATIVITY GALILEAN TRANSFORMATIONS SIMULTANEITY APRIL 21, 2011 1 I: LAWS OF MOTION Newton s first law Newton s first law (N1)
More informationSpecial Theory of Relativity Prof. Dr. Shiva Prasad Department of Physics Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay
(Refer Slide Time: 00:36) Special Theory of Relativity Prof. Dr. Shiva Prasad Department of Physics Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay Lecture - 7 Examples of Length Contraction and Time Dilation Hello,
More informationAdvantages of Three-Dimensional Space-Time Frames
Frontiers in Science 01, (3): 18-3 DOI: 10.593/j.fs.01003.01 Advantages of Three-Dimensional Space-Time Frames Tower Chen 1,*, Zeon Chen 1 Unit of Mathematical Sciences, College of Natural and Applied
More informationSpecial Theory of Relativity. A Brief introduction
Special Theory of Relativity A Brief introduction Classical Physics At the end of the 19th century it looked as if Physics was pretty well wrapped up. Newtonian mechanics and the law of Gravitation had
More information4/13/2015. Outlines CHAPTER 12 ELECTRODYNAMICS & RELATIVITY. 1. The special theory of relativity. 2. Relativistic Mechanics
CHAPTER 12 ELECTRODYNAMICS & RELATIVITY Lee Chow Department of Physics University of Central Florida Orlando, FL 32816 Outlines 1. The special theory of relativity 2. Relativistic Mechanics 3. Relativistic
More informationPhysics 123 Unit #5 Review
Physics 123 Unit #5 Review I. Definitions & Facts world line propagator rest energy total energy kinetic energy and inertial reference frame Lorentz boost relativistic invariants half-life scattering angle
More informationExtra notes on rela,vity. Wade Naylor
Extra notes on rela,vity Wade Naylor Over 105 years since Einstein s Special theory of relativity A. Einstein, 1879-1955 The postulates of special relativity 1. The principle of relativity (Galileo) states
More informationRELATIVITY. Special Relativity
RELATIVITY Special Relativity FROM WARMUP It was all interesting! How important is it for us to know the Galilean transformation equations and the math of the Michelson-Morley experiment? Know the Galilean
More information1st Year Relativity - Notes on Lectures 3, 4 & 5
1st Year Relativity - Notes on Lectures 3, 4 & 5 Lecture Three 1. Now lets look at two very important consequences of the LTs, Lorentz-Fitzgerald contraction and time dilation. We ll start with time dilation.
More informationSPH4U UNIVERSITY PHYSICS
SPH4U UNIVERSITY PHYSICS REVOLUTIONS IN MODERN PHYSICS:... L (P.580-587) Thought Experiments Einstein s two postulates seem straightforward and do not seem to lead to anything new for mechanics. However,
More informationChapter 5. Past and Proposed Experiments Detecting Absolute Motion
Chapter 5 Past and Proposed Experiments Detecting Absolute Motion In this Chapter I gave different interpretations for the results of some famous past experiments. My interpretations are based on the following
More informationWe search for the ether. Next time: The ether is missing Conspiracy? I think not!
We search for the ether Next time: The ether is missing Conspiracy? I think not! Waves Wave phenomena are important for the development of special relativity and for understanding quantum mechanics, so
More informationLecture 7: Special Relativity I
Lecture 7: Special Relativity I ª Einstein s postulates ª Time dilation ª Length contraction ª New velocity addition law Sidney Harris Please read Chapter 7 of the text 2/19/15 1 Albert Einstein ª Over
More informationSurvey of Astrophysics A110
Black Holes Goals: Understand Special Relativity General Relativity How do we observe black holes. Black Holes A consequence of gravity Massive neutron (>3M ) cannot be supported by degenerate neutron
More informationWelcome back to PHY 3305
Welcome back to PHY 3305 Today s Lecture: Consequences of Einstein s Postulates Lorentz Transformations Albert Einstein 1879-1955 Einstein s Postulates: 1. The laws of physics are invariant to observers
More informationInflation, vacua and the end of the Universe
Inflation, 10 500 vacua and the end of the Universe Homework Problems: 1-7 (15 points) 1-10 (25 points) 2-9 (20 points) 2-13 (20 points) from Spacetime Physics Physics 311 Special Relativity Lecture 4:
More informationEinstein s theory of special relativity
Einstein s theory of special relativity Announcements: First homework assignment is online, but you will need to read about time dilation to answer problem #3 and for the definition of ~for problems #4
More informationThe Theory of Relativity
At end of 20th century, scientists knew from Maxwell s E/M equations that light traveled as a wave. What medium does light travel through? There can be no doubt that the interplanetary and interstellar
More informationdt = p m, (2.1.1) dt = p
Chapter 2 Special relativity 2.1 Galilean relativity We start our discussion of symmetries by considering an important example of an invariance, i.e. an invariance of the equations of motion under a change
More informationENTER RELATIVITY THE HELIOCENTRISM VS GEOCENTRISM DEBATE ARISES FROM MATTER OF CHOOSING THE BEST REFERENCE POINT. GALILEAN TRANSFORMATION 8/19/2016
ENTER RELATIVITY RVBAUTISTA THE HELIOCENTRISM VS GEOCENTRISM DEBATE ARISES FROM MATTER OF CHOOSING THE BEST REFERENCE POINT. GALILEAN TRANSFORMATION The laws of mechanics must be the same in all inertial
More informationThe Lorentz Transformations
The Lorentz Transformations Michael Fowler, UVa Physics. /6/08 Problems with the Galilean Transformations We have already seen that Newtonian mechanics is invariant under the Galilean transformations relating
More informationParticle Physics: Special Relativity
Particle Physics: Special Relativity José I. Crespo-Anadón Week 3: February 10, 2017 Columbia University Science Honors Program Course policies Classes from 10:00 AM to 12:30 PM (10 min break at ~ 11:10
More informationLecture 4 - Lorentz contraction and the Lorentz transformations
Lecture 4 - Lorentz contraction and the Lorentz transformations E. Daw April 4, 2011 1 The inadequacy of the Galilean transformations In Lecture 1 we learned that two inertial (non-accelerating) observers,
More informationMassachusetts Institute of Technology Physics Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Physics Department Physics 8.20 IAP 2003 Introduction to Special Relativity January 6, 2003 Assignment 1 Corrected version Due January 13, 2003 Announcements Please
More informationLorentz Transformation x = γ (x vt) y = y z = z t = γ (t vx/c 2 ) where γ 1/(1 - v 2 /c 2 ) 1/2
Lorentz Transformation x = γ (x vt) y = y z = z t = γ (t vx/c 2 ) where γ 1/(1 - v 2 /c 2 ) 1/2 Problem: A rocket is traveling in the positive x-direction away from earth at speed 0.3c; it leaves earth
More informationChapter 1. Relativity 1
Chapter 1 Relativity 1 Classical Relativity inertial vs noninertial reference frames Inertial Reference Frames Galilean transformation: x = x vt; y = y; z = z; t = t u x = u x v; u y = u y ; u z = u z
More informationCHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity Part 2
CHAPTER 2 Special Theory of Relativity Part 2 2.1 The Apparent Need for Ether 2.2 The Michelson-Morley Experiment 2.3 Einstein s Postulates 2.4 The Lorentz Transformation 2.5 Time Dilation and Length Contraction
More information2.1 Einstein s postulates of Special Relativity. (i) There is no ether (there is no absolute system of reference).
Chapter 2 Special Relativity The contradiction brought about by the development of Electromagnetism gave rise to a crisis in the 19th century that Special Relativity resolved. 2.1 Einstein s postulates
More informationToday in Astronomy 102: relativity
Today in Astronomy 102: relativity Measurement of physical quantities, reference frames, and space-time diagrams. Relative and absolute physical quantities. Classical physics and Galileo s theory of relativity.
More informationLecture Notes on Relativity. Last updated 10/1/02 Pages 1 65 Lectures 1 10
Lecture Notes on Relativity Last updated 10/1/02 Pages 1 65 Lectures 1 10 Special Relativity: Introduction Describes physics of fast motion i.e. when objects move relative to each other at very high speeds,
More informationRecall from last time
Welcome back to Physics 215 Today s agenda: Relative Motion Special relativity Forces Physics 215 Spring 2017 Lecture 05-1 1 Recall from last time If we want to use (inertial) moving frames of reference,
More informationPostulate 2: Light propagates through empty space with a definite speed (c) independent of the speed of the source or of the observer.
Einstein s Special Theory of Relativity 1 m E = mv E =m*c m* = KE =m*c - m c 1- v p=mv p=m*v c 9-1 Postulate 1: The laws of physics have the same form in all inertial reference frames. Postulate : Light
More informationBaxter s Railroad Company.
Baxter s Railroad Company. J.C.Valks June 3, 2012 Abstract In this document we analyze the thought experiment proposed by Baxter. Baxter s conclusion is that his thought experiment shows a contradiction
More informationAccelerated Observers
Accelerated Observers In the last few lectures, we ve been discussing the implications that the postulates of special relativity have on the physics of our universe. We ve seen how to compute proper times
More informationAstronomy 102, Fall September 2009
Today in Astronomy 102: relativity Measurement of physical quantities, reference frames, and space-time diagrams. Relative and absolute physical quantities. Classical physics and Galileo s theory of relativity.
More information