Influence of photo- and chromatic acclimation on pigment composition in the sea*

Similar documents
Model dependences of the deactivation of phytoplankton pigment excitation energy on environmental conditions inthesea*

Qualitative and quantitative analysis of Baltic phytoplankton pigments*

CLASS 11 th. Photosynthesis

Natural Fluorescence Calculations: Terminology and Units

Small-scale effects of underwater bubble clouds on ocean reflectance: 3-D modeling results

Lecture 3. Photosynthesis 1

Marine Ecology I: Phytoplankton and Primary production

Long-term variations in primary production in a eutrophic sub-estuary. I. Seasonal and spatial patterns

Papers. Sea salt emission from the coastal zone. 1. Introduction

Light Absorption in Sea Water

Light scattering in Baltic crude oil seawater emulsion

Chlorophyll-a, Phycocyanin and Phytoplankton type products

Lecture-17. Electron Transfer in Proteins I

ESSOAr Non-exclusive First posted online: Sat, 1 Dec :39:37 This content has not been peer reviewed.

Apparent optical properties and radiative transfer theory*

Parting the Red Seas: The Optics of Red Tides

Life Sciences For NET & SLET Exams Of UGC-CSIR. Section B and C. Volume-10. Contents A. PHOTOSYNTHESIS 1 B. RESPIRATION AND PHOTORESPIRATION 33

Light and Photosynthesis. Supplemental notes Lab 4 Horticultural Therapy

Pigment packaging effects in Thalassiosira pseudonana under light regulated steady-state growth

Photosynthesis. The Sun powers life. capture about 5% of the Sun s energy and, through the process of, provide energy to.

Bio-optical Algorithms for European Seas

Variability in pigment composition and optical characteristics of phytoplankton in the Labrador Sea and the Central North Atlantic

Acoustical recognition of the bottom sediments in the southern Baltic Sea

Virtual Lab 5 Photosynthesis

Variable Fluorescence 4/13/10. Fluorescence HEAT

University of Groningen

BLUE LIGHT, RED LIGHT, WHITE LIGHT GROWTH COMPARISON OF BRASSICA RAPA. Author(s) Redacted

Unit 1 Matter & Energy for Life. Biology Photosynthesis

Studying coral reef ecosystems with NASA tools in an age of climate change and coral bleaching: the role of spectroscopy

Exploring the Temporal and Spatial Dynamics of UV Attenuation and CDOM in the Surface Ocean using New Algorithms

Modeling of elastic and inelastic scattering effects in oceanic optics

5/08/ :49 PM 28/02/13. Lecture 2: Photosynthesis:

Light reaction. Dark reaction

Ecosystems. 1. Population Interactions 2. Energy Flow 3. Material Cycle

Connection between light field parameters and optical properties of seawater

Photosynthesis. 1) Heterotrophs: 2) Autotrophs: 3) Phytoplankton:

Primary Production using Ocean Color Remote Sensing. Watson Gregg NASA/Global Modeling and Assimilation Office

Inclusion of Earth Observations and ferrybox data improves status assessments in the Gulf of Finland

C M E M S O c e a n C o l o u r S a t e l l i t e P r o d u c t s

EBS 566/666 Lecture 8: (i) Energy flow, (ii) food webs

Photosynthesis in Higher Plants

Transduction of Light Energy in Chloroplasts

Bio-optical properties of oceanic waters: A reappraisal

Photosynthesis. Introduction

A Time Series of Photo-synthetically Available Radiation at the Ocean Surface from SeaWiFS and MODIS Data

Measurement of solar-stimulated fluorescence in natural waters

Apparent and inherent optical properties in the ocean

RESEARCH EDGE SPECTRAL REMOTE SENSING OF THE COAST. Karl Heinz Szekielda

Comparison of algorithms for estimating ocean primary production from surface chlorophyll, temperature, and irradiance

Astrid Bracher PHYTOOPTICS group, Climate Sciences, AWI & IUP, University Bremen

Assessment of the ultraviolet radiation field in ocean waters from space-based measurements and full radiative-transfer calculations

Rrs(λ) IOPs. What to do with the retrieved IOPs?

Received 17 January 2017; revised 30 March 2017; accepted 30 March 2017; posted 7 April 2017 (Doc. ID ); published 3 May 2017

Answers to questions on exam in laser-based combustion diagnostics on March 10, 2006

Plant Pigments Chromatography

Lecture 3 Absorption physics and absorbing materials

The light reactions convert solar energy to the chemical energy of ATP and NADPH

LESSON THREE Time, Temperature, Chlorophyll a Does sea surface temperature affect chlorophyll a concentrations?

MERIS Reprocessing Neural Net Algorithm. Roland Doerffer, Carsten Brockmann,

Algal Physiology. I. Photosynthesis in algae II. Characteristics to distinguish algal divisions. I. Photosynthesis

I. Photosynthesis. Algal Physiology. I. Photosynthesis in algae II. Characteristics to distinguish algal divisions

A THEORETICAL ANALYSIS OF THE CONTRIBUTION OF ALGAL CELLS TO THE ATTENUATION OF LIGHT WITHIN NATURAL WATERS

4.1. Photosynthesis Light-Dependent Reactions

Analysis of the particle size distribution and optical properties in the Korean seas

PHOTOSYNTHESIS. The Details

Photosynthesis is the main route by which that energy enters the biosphere of the Earth.

Abstract For many oceanographic studies and applications, it is desirable to know the spectrum of the attenuation coefficient.

(Received 15 June 2000; in revised form 5 January 2001; accepted 11 January 2001)

Photosynthesis (2.9) IB Diploma Biology

Validation of a leaf reflectance and transmittance model for three agricultural crop species

Photosynthesis in Detail. 3/19/2014 Averett

Bio-optical modeling of IOPs (PFT approaches)

In situ determination of the remotely sensed reflectance and the absorption coefficient: closure and inversion

PHOTOACCLIMATION OF PHOTOSYNTHESIS IRRADIANCE RESPONSE CURVES AND PHOTOSYNTHETIC PIGMENTS IN MICROALGAE AND CYANOBACTERIA 1

Detecting the Red Edge of absorption in Puget Sound from Satellite measured water-leaving radiance

Lab #5 Multicellular Marine Primary Producers. Part 1: Photosynthesis and Photosynthetic Pigments

I. Photosynthesis. Algal Physiology. I. Photosynthesis in algae II. Characteristics to distinguish algal divisions

Supporting information for: Insights into colour-tuning of chlorophyll optical. response in green plants

Chapter 15 Molecular Luminescence Spectrometry

Light Absorption in Sea Water

The Physical Properties of Sea Water OCEA 101

Aerosol properties and radiative forcing for three air masses transported in Summer 2011 to Sopot, Poland

Ocean Colour Remote Sensing in Turbid Waters. Lecture 2: Introduction to computer exercise #1 The Colour of Water.

1/24/2011. Why do we care about biomass? Direct aggregation and pulsed export is also important

Photosynthesis: Life from Light AP Biology

Remote sensing of Suninduced. Part 1: from PSII to FLH.

MERIS for Case 2 Waters

Physiological Ecology. Physiological Ecology. Physiological Ecology. Nutrient and Energy Transfer. Introduction to Ecology

Remote Sensing of Episodic Rainfall Events Affecting Coral Reefs in Southwestern Puerto Rico

CHEMTAX,. , CHEMTAX, g/m % % 4. 50% % 4. 83% %.

WHAT ARE PHYTOPLANKTON?

Chapter 8 PHOTOSYNTHESIS Chapter # Chapter Title PowerPoint Image Slideshow

Improving radiation use efficiency in tropical rice

Phytoplankton natural fluorescence variability in the Sargasso Sea

Spectral reflectance: When the solar radiation is incident upon the earth s surface, it is either

BAYESIAN METHODOLOGY FOR ATMOSPHERIC CORRECTION OF PACE OCEAN-COLOR IMAGERY

Sea ice microbial communities. VII. Changes in under-ice spectral irradiance during the development of Antarctic sea ice microalgal communities

INTRODUCTION Radiation differs from conduction and convection in that it does not require the presence of a material medium to take place.

Comparison of Algorithms for Estimating Ocean Primary Production from Surface Chlorophyll, Temperature, and Irradiance

Separation and Identification of Plant Pigments Dr. Gergens - SD Mesa College

Transcription:

Influence of photo- and chromatic acclimation on pigment composition in the sea* OCEANOLOGIA, 42 (2), 2. pp. 157 175. 2, by Institute of Oceanology PAS. KEYWORDS Phytoplankton pigments Pigments light absorption Photoprotecting pigments Photosynthetic pigments Photoacclimation Chromatic acclimation Roman Majchrowski 2 Mirosława Ostrowska 1 1 Institute of Oceanology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Powstańców Warszawy 55, PL 81 712 Sopot, Poland 2 Institute of Physics, Pedagogical University, Arciszewskiego 22 B, PL 76 2 Słupsk, Poland; e-mail: roman@wsp.slupsk.pl Manuscript received 9 March 2, reviewed 27 March 2, accepted 7 April 2. Abstract The aim of this work was to find statistical relationships between the concentrations of accessory pigments in natural populations of marine phytoplankton and the absolute levels and spectral distributions of underwater irradiance. To this end, empirical data sets from some 6 stations in different parts of the seas and oceans were analysed. These data were obtained from the authors own research and from the Internet s bio-optical data base. They included the vertical distributions of the concentrations of various pigments (identified chromatographically) and the vertical and spectral distributions of the underwater irradiance measured in situ or determined indirectly from bio-optical models. The analysis covered a total of some 4 points illustrating the dependence of pigment concentration on underwater irradiance characteristics, corresponding to different depths in the sea. * Part of this paper was presented at the Second Workshop on Luminescence and Photosynthesis of Marine Phytoplankton, Sopot Paraszyno, 11 15 October 1999.

158 R. Majchrowski, M. Ostrowska The analysis showed that the factor governing the occurrence of photoprotecting carotenoids (PPC) is short-wave radiation λ<48 nm. A mathematical relationship was established between the relative PPC concentration (relative with respect to the chlorophyll a concentration) and the magnitude of the absorbed radiative energy per unit mass of chlorophyll a from the spectral interval λ < 48 nm, averaged in the water layers z = 6 m (or less near the surface) to account for vertical mixing. This absorbed short-wave radiation (λ <48 nm) was given the name of Potentially Destructive Radiation (PDR (z)). Analysis of the relationships between the concentrations of particular photosynthetic pigments (PSP), i.e. chlorophyll b, chlorophyll c, photosynthetic carotenoids (PSC), and the underwater irradiance characteristics indicated that these concentrations were only slightly dependent on the absolute level of irradiance E (λ), but that they depended strongly on the relative spectral distribution of this irradiance f(λ) =E (λ)/p AR. The relevant approximate statistical relationships between the relative concentrations of particular PSP and the function of spectral fitting F j, averaged in the layer z, were derived. Certain statistical relationships between the pigment composition of the phtyoplankton and the irradiance field characteristics are due to the photo- and chromatic acclimation of natural populations of marine phytoplankton. These relationships can be applied in models of the coefficients of light absorption by phytoplankton. 1. Introduction The adaptation and acclimation of marine phytoplankton is a complicated problem. It was discovered long ago that one of the main mechanisms of acclimation is a modification of the pigment composition in the photosynthetic apparatus (Steemann Nielsen 1975 and the papers cited there). It is also well known that relationships exist between the concentrations of accessory pigments and the different optical characteristics of natural light fields in a plant s growth environment (see our earlier papers: Woźniak et al. 1997, Majchrowski & Ostrowska 1999). However, these relationships have not yet been examined in detail. The aim of this paper is to determine a set of statistical relationships between the concentrations of the various accessory pigments in natural marine phytoplankton and the absolute levels and spectral distributions of underwater light fields. To do this, we carried out a statistical analysis of our own empirical data and that available on the Internet. 2. Presentation of the physical problem The photosynthetic apparatus of a plant contains not only chlorophyll a but also a lot of accessory pigments. We can divide all these pigments into two main types which perform different functions in plant cells (Bidigare et al. 199). One of these types includes the Photosynthetic Pigments (PSP), which absorb light as if they were antennas: their excitation energy is

Influence of photo- and chromatic acclimation on pigment composition... 159 used in photosynthesis with a certain efficiency. The accessory photosynthetic pigments absorb radiation energy over and above that absorbed by chlorophyll a and transfer it to chlorophyll a. Only chlorophyll a supplies energy directly to the photosynthetic process at the reaction centres. These accessory photosynthetic pigments are chlorophylls b, chlorophylls c and the photosynthetic carotenoids (PSC), such as fucoxanthin, 19 but-fucoxanthin, 19 hex-fucoxanthin, peridinin, prasinoxanthin and α-carotene. The concentration of these pigments is controlled by chromatic acclimation processes (Steemann Nielsen 1975, Zvalinsky 1986). The second type of accessory pigments, known as Photoprotecting Pigments (PPP), protect the photosynthetic apparatus from veryhigh-energy photons, which are capable of destroying reaction centres and oxidising chlorophyll a molecules. Neither the energy absorbed by these pigments, nor that generated through their quenching of the chlorophyll a triplet state, is used for photosynthesis. PPP consist mainly of carotenoids: diadinoxanthin, alloxanthin, zeaxanthin, diatoxanthin, lutein, antheraxanthin, β-carotene, violaxanthin, neoxanthin and dinoxanthin, and their existence in the plant cells depends on the photoacclimation of the cells (Steemann Nielsen 1975, Zvalinsky 1986). Figure 1 shows examples of vertical changes in PPP concentrations in relation to chlorophyll a for different types of seas: the decrease in PPP concentrations with depth for all trophic types of water is evident. High intensities of potentially harmful short-wave radiation in shallow waters elevate concentrations of photoprotecting carotenoids (PPC) in surface layer phytoplankton. In deep waters the absolute level of short-wave radiation is lower, hence there is no need for large quantities of PPP in cells. Their relative concentrations therefore decrease with depth. Figure 2 shows examples of vertical profiles of relative PSC concentrations: these increase with depth. This depth-dependent behaviour of the phytoplankton pigment composition is due to the characteristic influence of optical factors on accessory pigment production. The three sets of spectra in Fig. 3 help to show up the links between pigment concentrations and the spectral characteristics of underwater light fields. The specific absorption spectra (specific to unit mass of a particular pigment) of the main groups of pigments, i.e. chlorophylls a, chlorophylls b, chlorophylls c, PSC and PPC in the visible spectrum, are shown in Fig. 3a. Figs. 3b and 3c depict model spectra of the relative irradiance in oligotrophic (C a () =.35 mg tot. chl a m 3 ) and eutrophic (C a () = 35 mg tot. chl a m 3 ) seas at different depths. In both cases the optical depths are the same:.5, 1.15, 2.3, 4.6, 9.2. As one can see, in deep oligotrophic waters, the light is mainly from the blue-green spectral range.

16 R. Majchrowski, M. Ostrowska a b depth z [m] 25 5 75 1 125 15 7 1 6 2 3 4 5 optical depth t 175 1.2.4.6.8 1.2.4.6.8 1 2 4 6 8 7 1 2 6 3 5 4 pigment ratio C PPC / C a pigment ratio C PPC / Fig. 1. Vertical profiles of typical examples of the ratio of photoprotecting carotenoids (C PPC ) to total chlorophyll a (C a ) for a real depth z (a); for an optical depth τ (b); recorded at the same stations with different surface total chlorophyll a concentrations C a (): 1 Polish-Russian database Pacific (C a () =.5 mg tot. chl a m 3 ); 2 (Bidigare 1992a) equatorial Pacific (C a () =.158 mg tot. chl a m 3 ); 3 (Goericke 1995b) Arabian Sea (C a () =.341 mg tot. chl a m 3 ); 4 (Goericke 1995b) Arabian Sea (C a () =.794 mg tot. chl a m 3 ); 5 (Goericke 1995b) Arabian Sea (C a () =1.38mgtot.chla m 3 ); 6 (Goericke 1995b) Arabian Sea (C a () = 2.42 mg tot. chl a m 3 ); 7 (Olaizola 1996) Baltic Sea (C a () = 7.9 mg tot. chl a m 3 ) C a a b depth z [m] 25 5 75 1 125 15 6 4 7 3 1 2 optical depth t 175 1.2.4.6.8 1.2.4.6.8 1 pigment ratio C PSC /C a pigment ratio C PSC /C a 5 2 4 6 8 6 4 7 3 1 2 5

Influence of photo- and chromatic acclimation on pigment composition... 161 Under such conditions plants have to produce photosynthetic carotenoids, which act as additional antennas absorbing energy. In eutrophic waters, blue-green light does not penetrate very deeply, so changes in pigment composition are less noticeable. Taking such regularities into consideration, we can try to find the optical parameters controlling the relative concentrations of different groups of pigments at different depths in the sea. A first attempt to determine these parameters can be found in Woźniak et al. 1997. In the present paper, we present an improved correlation between the relative photosynthetic pigment concentrations and the functions of spectral fitting, which we call chromatic adaptation factors: F j = 1 where f(λ) = E (λ) PAR a j (λ) a j, max 7 nm a j, max 4 nm f(λ) a j (λ) dλ, (1) the relative spectral distribution of scalar irradiance in the sea, spectral specific absorption coefficient of the j-th pigment group, values of the spectral specific absorption coefficient in the spectral maximum of the j-th group of pigments; the j-th group of pigments consists of a chlorophyll a, b chlorophyll b; c chlorophyll c, PSC photosynthetic carotenoids. The function of spectral fitting F j rangesfromto1.itisequaltowhen the pigment absorption spectrum does not overlap the underwater irradiance spectrum. If the in situ irradiance happens to have a narrow spectral wave band compatible with the absorption spectrum maximum of this j-th group of pigments, then F j equals 1. This function depends on relative spectral distributions, not on absolute values of light energy. Fig. 2. Vertical profiles of typical ratios of photosynthetic carotenoid concentrations (C PSC ) to total chlorophyll a (C a ) for a real depth z (a); for an optical depth τ (b); recorded at the same stations with different surface total chlorophyll a concentrations C a (): 1 Polish-Russian database Pacific (C a () =.5 mg tot. chl a m 3 ); 2 (Bidigare 1992a) equatorial Pacific (C a () =.7 mg tot. chl a m 3 ); 3 (Bidigare 1992c) equatorial Pacific (C a () =.147 mg tot. chl a m 3 ); 4 (Goericke 1995a) Arabian Sea (C a () =.327 mg tot. chl a m 3 ); 5 Polish-Russian database Baltic Sea (C a () =.69 mg tot. chl a m 3 ); 6 (Olaizola 1996) Baltic Sea (C a ()=3.5mgtot.chla m 3 );7 (Olaizola 1966) Baltic Sea (C a () = 7.1 mg tot. chl a m 3 )

162 R. Majchrowski, M. Ostrowska j 2 (mg pigment) ñ1 ] specific absorption coefficient a * [m.1.8.6.4.2 a 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 wavelength chl a chl b chl c PSC PPC l [nm] 1..8.6 b O1ñ oligotrophic optical depth t.5 1.15 2.3 4.6 9.2 1..8.6 c E5 ñ eutrophic E (,)/ l z E ( l max,) z d d.4.4.2.2 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 wavelength l [nm] wavelength l [nm] Fig. 3. Specific absorption spectra for the major unpackaged pigment groups (after Woźniak et al. 1999) (a); downwelling irradiance spectra of Woźniak s water mass classification (Woźniak et al. 1992) for oligotrophic waters O1 C a () =.35 mg tot. chl a m 3 (b) and for eutrophic waters E5 C a () =35mgtot.chla m 3 (c) at the same optical depths

Influence of photo- and chromatic acclimation on pigment composition... 163 Woźniak et al. (1997) determined another factor correlating with the relative PPC concentration. This factor depends on the absolute quantity of light energy from the short-wave band of the spectrum (λ <48 nm; in practice 4 48 nm is applied in calculations). The best correlation was established for the factor known as Potentially Destructive Radiation (PDR): 48 nm PDR = a a (λ) E (λ) day dλ, (2) 4 nm where PDR PDR energy absorbed per unit mass of chlorophyll, a a(λ) chlorophyll a specific spectral absorption coefficient, E (λ) day daily mean spectral scalar irradiance. The PDR is equal to the energy from the blue-green spectral range absorbed by unit mass of chlorophyll a, and is potentially capable of photo-oxidising it. It turns out that the correlation is best if PDR at a given depth is replaced by the mean PDR at 6 m. In this way, vertical mixing of water is included in the calculation. Woźniak et al. (1997) also give the respective statistical relationships between the relative concentrations of the main groups of pigments and the functions of spectral fitting F j and/or PDR. These relationships were obtained from a sparse experimental data set (only about 2 empirical points for each event). In our opinion, the use of these relationships to calculate the concentrations of particular groups of pigments in different conditions is fraught with significant error. In the present work an enlarged database was used, and the modified relationships thereby obtained were more accurate. 3. Empirical data To achieve our objective, empirical data from 68 sites in various regions of the World Oceans were analysed. We collected data from our own investigations and the Internet bio-optical database the U. S. JGOFS Data System (see Table 1). Our database included the following sets of empirical data: (1) Phytoplankton pigment concentrations (different types of chlorophylls and carotenoids) determined by different methods, mainly by HPLC (High Performance Liquid Chromatography) or, in the nineteen-sixties and early seventies, by TLC (Thin Layer Chromatography). (2) Spectral distributions of downward irradiance at various depths in the sea.

Table 1. The empirical database specification Experiment Stations Sets of measurements Location References, Optical measurements of PSP of PPC of PSP of PPC or name of person at the surface at different analyses analyses analyses analyses measuring pigment depths concentrations Polish-Russian 126 46 333 219 Baltic Sea, Koblentz-Mishke + + database Black Sea, & Semenova (1975), Pacific Semenova (1975), Kornushenko et al. (198) ULISSE 91 3 268 82 Baltic Sea Olaizola (1996) + + eqpac tt7 39 39 428 428 equatorial Pacific Bidigare (1992a) 39 sites Newton (1992a) eqpac tt8 33 33 234 234 equatorial Pacific Bidigare (1992b) 2 sites Newton (1992b) eqpac tt11 44 44 482 482 equatorial Pacific Bidigare (1992c) 38 sites Newton (1992c) eqpac tt12 34 34 215 215 equatorial Pacific Bidigare (1992d) Arabian ttn-43 77 77 53 53 Arabian Sea Goericke (1995a) Arabian ttn-45 29 29 255 255 Arabian Sea Bidigare (1995a) Arabian ttn-49 72 72 55 55 Arabian Sea Goericke (1995b) Arabian ttn-5 29 21 Arabian Sea Bidigare (1995b) Arabian ttn-53 34 389 Arabian Sea Bidigare (1995c) total 68 44 3849 295 164 R. Majchrowski, M. Ostrowska

Influence of photo- and chromatic acclimation on pigment composition... 165 Direct measurements of the downward spectral irradiance distribution were made only during the collection of data denoted in Table 1 as the Polish-Russian database and the ULISSE 1 experiment (at 217 of the stations in question). In the other cases, unfortunately, only the total, not the spectral, irradiance at the sea surface was measured, and/or optical measurements in the sea were carried out sporadically. Thus, if surface-measured optical data were unavailable, we assumed the surface spectral PAR() irradiance typical of the relevant geographical zone (Timofeyev 1983). From this, the underwater light field distributions in the various trophic types of seas were estimated according to the algorithm given in Woźniak et al. (1992). This algorithm is based on a bio-optical model of the relationship between the spectral downward irradiance attenuation coefficient and the chlorophyll a concentration in the sea. The errors inherent in such estimations with reference to underwater irradiation attenuation coefficients are of the order of 1%; the estimations are thus deemed sufficiently accurate (see Woźniak et al. 1992). The relevant data is specified in Table 1. The following quantities were determined from the input data for statistical analyses: (1) The relative concentrations of PPC, PSC, chl b, chlc, defined as the rates C PPC /C a, C PSC /C a, C b /C a and C c /C a respectively, where C a denotes the sum of chl a and divinyl chl a at given depths in the sea. (2) Typical PDR values for these depths determined from eq. (2) using the spectra of the specific light absorption coefficient of chlorophyll a according to Woźniak et al. (1999). (3) The different functions of spectral fitting (F a, F b, F c, F PSC )typical of these depths, determined from eq. (1) using the spectra of the light absorption coefficients of different pigments according to Woźniak et al. (1999). About 3 points of C PPC /C a, versus PDR relations, and about 4 points of C j /C a, versus F j relations at different depths in the sea were examined altogether. 4. Results and discussion The analyses confirm that the short-wave (blue-green) part of the PAR range is the factor controlling the occurrence of photoprotecting carotenoids (PPC). A mathematical relationship is given describing the 1 Underwater Light Seatruth Satellite Experiment, in co-operation with the Commission of the European Union Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy and the Institute of Oceanology PAS (Ooms, 1996).

166 R. Majchrowski, M. Ostrowska a b 1.5 1.5 1. 1. PPC a pigment ratio C / C.5.5.1.1.1.1 1 1.1.1.1.1 1 1 mean Potentially Destructive Radiation < PDR* > [ mein s (mg chl a) ] Dz = 6 m ñ1 ñ1 c d calculated C PPC, C [mg m ] ñ3 1 1 1.1.1.1.1.1.1 1 1 measured [mg m ] C PPC, M ñ3 frequency [%] 25 2 15 1 5.2 1 5 ratio C PPC, C /C PPC, M Fig. 4. Results of a statistical analysis of regularities in the occurrence of photoprotecting carotenoids (PPC): statistical dependence of the ratio of photoprotecting carotenoid concentrations C PPC to total chlorophyll ac a on the mean Potentially Destructive Radiation <PDR > z=6 m (dots measurements, solid line calculated from eq. (3)) (a); mean values and standard deviations of the ratio of photoprotecting carotenoid concentrations C PPC to total chlorophyll a C a as a function of the mean Potentially Destructive Radiation <PDR > z=6 m (points with error bars mean values, solid line calculated from eq. (3)) (b); comparison between calculated C PPC,C and measured C PPC,M photoprotecting carotenoid concentrations at various stations and depths in the sea (c); frequency distribution of the ratio C PPC,C /C PPC,M (d)

Influence of photo- and chromatic acclimation on pigment composition... 167 relative concentrations of C PPC (z)/c a () as a function of the Potentially Destructive Radiation (the energy of spectral range 4 <λ<48 nm absorbed per unit mass of chlorophyll a PDR (z)), averaged in the z = 6 m layer (or less near the surface see explanation to eq. (4)) to account for vertical mixing (published earlier in Majchrowski & Ostrowska 1999): C PPC =(.1758 <PDR > z=6 m +.176) C a, (3) where <PDR 1 z 2 > z = PDR(z) dz, (4) z 2 z 1 z 1 and z 1 = z 3 m if z 3 m and z 1 = if z<3 m, z 2 = z +3 m. Figures 4a and b shows the functional form of eq. (3) with the experimental points. To estimate errors, measured PPC concentrations (C PPC,M ) were compared with the PPC concentrations (C PPC,C ) calculated from eq. (3) using known C a and PDR data. The results are presented in Figs. 4c and 4d. Table 2 gives the calculated errors of the estimation. As can be seen, the statistical error σ + is 47%, so the accuracy of the model may be assumed satisfactory. Table 2. Relative errors in estimating photoprotecting carotenoid concentrations from the model formula (3) at various depths in the seas Arithmetic statistics Logarithmic statistics systematic statistical systematic standard error factor statistical ε [%] σ ε [%] ε g [%] x σ [%] σ + [%] C PPC 7.8 ± 45..22 1.47 32. 46.9 where ε =(C PPC,C C PPC,M )/C PPC,M errors, ε arithmetic mean of errors, σ ε standard deviation of errors (statistical error), ε g =1 [ log (C PPC,C/C ) ] PPC,M 1 logarithmic mean of errors, log (C PPC,C /C PPC,M ) meanoflog(c PPC,C /C PPC,M ), σ log standard deviation of log (C PPC,C /C PPC,M ), x =1 σ log standard error factor, σ = 1 x 1 and σ + = x 1.

168 R. Majchrowski, M. Ostrowska a b 1.6 1.6 1.2 1.2 PSC a pigment ratio C / C.8.4.3.4.5.6.7.3.4.5.6.7 mean chromatic adaptation factor < F PSC >.8.4 D z = 6 m c d calculated C PSC, C [mg m ] ñ3 1 1 1.1.1.1.1.1.1 1 1 measured [mg m ] C PSC, M ñ3 frequency [%] 25 2 15 1 5.3 1 3 ratio C PSC, C /C PSC, M Fig. 5. Results of a statistical analysis of regularities in the occurrence of photosynthetic carotenoids (PSC): statistical dependence of the ratio of photosynthetic carotenoid concentrations C PSC to total chlorophyll a C a on the mean chromatic adaptation factor for photosynthetic carotenoids <F PSC > z=6 m (dots measurements, solid line approximated by eq. (5)) (a); mean values and standard deviations of the ratio of photosynthetic carotenoid concentrations C PSC to total chlorophyll ac a as a function of the mean chromatic adaptation factor for photosynthetic carotenoids <F PSC > z=6 m (points with error bars mean values, solid line approximated by eq. (5)) (b); comparison of calculated C PSC,C (eq. (5)) and measured C PSC,M photosynthetic carotenoid concentrations at various stations and depths in the sea (c); frequency distribution of the ratio C PSC,C /C PSC,M (d)

Influence of photo- and chromatic acclimation on pigment composition... 169 Analysis of the relationships between particular accessory photosynthetic pigments (PSP) (i.e. chls b, chlsc, photosynthetic carotenoids (PSC)) and underwater irradiance characteristics shows that they depend only slightly on the absolute irradiance level E (λ), but strongly on the relative spectral distribution f(λ) =E (λ)/p AR. The corresponding statistical approximations of the relationships between the relative concentrations of particular PSP and the function of spectral fitting eq. (1) averaged in the z = 6 m layer were found. The following relationships describing the relative concentrations of particular photosynthetic pigments are proposed: C PSC =(1.348 <F PSC > z=6 m.93) C a, (5) C b =(54.7 <F b > 5.157 z=6 m +.97) C a, (6) C c =(.42 <F a > 1.197 z=6 m <F c > z=6 m ) C a. (7) The relationship for the relative chlorophyll c concentration was the most difficult to determine. The problem was that the spectral properties of chlorophylls c are similar to those of chlorophylls a. We did manage to find the relationship after considering the two functions of spectral fitting: F a for chlorophylls a and F c for chlorophylls c. Relationships (5), (6) and (7) with experimental points (or mean values of the experimental data range) as a background are illustrated in Figs. 5a, 5b, 6a, 6b, 7a and 7b. A verification of these formulae in the form of a comparison of measured and calculated individual pigment concentrations (Figs. 5c, 6c and 7c), as well as error histograms (Figs. 5d, 6d and 7d), and calculated errors (Table 3) are also given. The statistical errors (σ + ca 32% for PSC, 68% for chlorophylls b and 52% for chlorophylls c) seem to be at a satisfactory level at this stage of the investigation. Table 3. The relative errors in estimating particular pigment concentrations from the model: for photosynthetic carotenoid concentrations C PSC (eq. (5)), for chlorophyll b concentrations C b (eq. (6)), and for chlorophyll c concentrations C c (eq. (7)) Arithmetic statistics Logarithmic statistics systematic statistical systematic standard error factor statistical ε [%] σ ε [%] ε g [%] x σ [%] σ + [%] C PSC 3.96 ± 32..22 1.32 24.2 31.9 C b 15.4 ± 72.5.695 1.68 4.4 67.9 C C 9.46 ± 51.5.8 1.52 34.2 52. The errors are calculated in the same way as in Table 2.

17 R. Majchrowski, M. Ostrowska a b 1. 1..8.8.6.6 b a pigment ratio C / C.4.2.1.2.3.4.5.1.2.3.4.5 mean chromatic adaptation factor < F b >.4.2 D z= 6 m c d calculated C b, C [mg m ] ñ3 1 1 1.1.1.1.1.1.1 1 1 measured [mg m ] C b, M ñ3 frequency [%] 25 2 15 1 5.1 1 1 ratio C b, C /C b, M Fig. 6. Results of a statistical analysis of regularities in the occurrence of chlorophyll b: dependence of the ratio of chlorophyll b concentration C b to total chlorophyll a concentration C a on the mean chromatic adaptation factor for chlorophyll b, <F b > z=6 m (dots measurements, solid line calculated from eq. (6)) (a); mean values and standard deviations of the ratio of chlorophyll b concentration C b to total chlorophyll a concentration C a as a function the mean chromatic adaptation factor for chlorophyll b<f b > z=6 m (points with error bars mean values, solid line approximated by eq. (6)) (b); comparison of calculated C b, C (eq. (6)) and measured C b, M chlorophyll b concentrations at various stations and depths in the sea (c); frequency distribution of the ratio C b, C /C b, M (d)

Influence of photo- and chromatic acclimation on pigment composition... 171 a b 1 1 D = 6 m ) F c z c a< > ratio C /( C 1..1.1.1.1.2.3.1.2.3 mean chromatic adaptation factor < F a > 1..1 D z= 6 m c d calculated C c, C [mg m ] ñ3 1 1 1.1.1.1.1.1.1 1 1 measured [mg m ] C c, M ñ3 frequency [%] 25 2 15 1 5.2 1 5 ratio C c, C /C c, M Fig. 7. Results of a statistical analysis of regularities in the occurrence of chlorophyll c: statistical dependence of the ratio of chlorophyll c concentration C c to product of total chlorophyll a concentration C a and mean F c, on the mean chromatic adaptation factor for chlorophyll a, <F a > z=6 m (dots measurements, solid line calculated from eq. (7)) (a); mean values and standard deviations of the ratio of chlorophyll c concentration C c to product of total chlorophyll a concentration C a and mean F c as a function the mean chromatic adaptation factor for chlorophyll a<f a > z=6 m (points with error bars mean values, solid line approximated by eq. (7)) (b); comparison of calculated C c, C (eq. (7)) and measured C c, M chlorophyll c concentrations at various stations and depths in the sea (c); frequency distribution of the ratio C c, C /C c, M (d)

172 R. Majchrowski, M. Ostrowska a b depth z [m] 5 1 15 2 25 3 35 E4 E3 E2 E1 P M 3 2 1 5 1 15 2 25 3 35 E4 E3 E2 E1 P M 3 2 1 4 4.1.2.3.4.5.6.3.4.5.6.7.8.9 1. pigment ratio C PPC /C a pigment ratio C PSC /C a c d depth z [m] 5 1 15 2 25 3 35 E4 E3 E2 E1 P M 3 2 4 4.1.2.3.4.5.6.7.1.2.3.4 pigment ratio C b /C a pigment ratio C / C 5 1 15 2 25 3 35 1 1 2 c a E4 E3 E2 E1 3 M P Fig. 8. Modelled profiles of pigment concentrations: relative concentrations of photoprotecting carotenoids for PAR ( + ) = 52 µein s 1 m 2 (see eq. (3)) (a); relative concentrations of photosynthetic carotenoids (eq. (5)) (b); relative concentrations of chlorophyll b (eq. (6)) (c); relative concentrations of chlorophyll c (eq. (7)) (d); surface chlorophyll a concentrations C a () were assumed to represent the water trophic type index (according to Woźniak et al. 1992), where: O1 C a () =.35 mg tot. chl a m 3 ; O2 C a () =.7 mg tot. chl a m 3 ; O3 C a () =.15 mg tot. chl a m 3 ; M C a () =.35 mg tot. chl a m 3 ; P C a () =.7 mg tot. chla m 3 ; E1 C a () = 1.5 mg tot. chla m 3 ; E2 C a () = 3.5 mg tot. chla m 3 ; E3 C a () = 7 mg tot. chl a m 3 ; E4 C a () = 15 mg tot. chl a m 3

Influence of photo- and chromatic acclimation on pigment composition... 173 The relationships established (see eqs. (3), (5), (6) and (7)) enable the vertical profiles of the main pigment group concentrations to be estimated in different types of seas from oligotrophic to eutrophic waters. Examples of such relationships are shown in Fig. 8: from this, the similarity of the calculated vertical profiles to the experimental ones given in Figs. 1 and 2 is evident. 5. Conclusion According to our findings, the short-wave (blue-green) part of the PAR spectral range is the factor governing the occurrence of photoprotecting carotenoids (PPC) in phytoplankton cells. A mathematical relationship has been established to describe the relative concentrations of photoprotecting carotenoids PPC(z) (in relation to chlorophyll a) as a function of the Potentially Destructive Radiation PDR (z), averaged in a water layer of around z = 6 m to account for vertical mixing. The accessory PSP (chls b, chls c, photosynthetic carotenoids (PSC)) were found to be strongly dependent on the relative spectral distribution of irradiance f(λ) =E (λ)/p AR but only slightly dependent on the level of irradiance. The corresponding statistical approximations of the relationships between the relative concentration of a particular photosynthetic pigment PSP and the function of spectral fitting F j (averaged in an approximately 6 m water layer) were determined. The statistical tendencies of the relationships between the phytoplankton pigment compositions and the light field characteristics discussed in this paper are due to the photo- and chromatic acclimation of natural marine phytoplankton populations. The relationships obtained have been applied in models of phytoplankton light absorption in various types of water and different depths in the sea (Woźniak et al. 2 and Majchrowski et al. 2, this volume). References Bidigare R., 1992a, tt7 Pigments, U.S.JGOFSDataSystem, Bidigare R., 1992b, tt8 Pigments, U.S.JGOFSDataSystem, Bidigare R., 1992c, tt11 Pigments, U.S.JGOFSDataSystem, Bidigare R., 1992d, tt12 Pigments, U.S.JGOFSDataSystem, Bidigare R., 1995a, ttn-45 Pigments, U. S. JGOFS Data System,

174 R. Majchrowski, M. Ostrowska Bidigare R., 1995b, ttn-5 Pigments, U.S.JGOFSDataSystem, Bidigare R., 1995c, ttn-53 Pigments, U.S.JGOFSDataSystem, Bidigare R., Ondrusek M. E., Morrow J. H., Kiefer D. A., 199, In vivo absorption properties of algal pigments, Ocean Optics 1, Proc. SPIE, 132, 29 32. Goericke R., 1995a, ttn-43 HPLC pigments, U. S. JGOFS Data System, Goericke R., 1995b, ttn-49 HPLC pigments, U.S.JGOFSDataSystem, Koblentz-Mishke O. I., Semenova M. A., 1975, Phytoplankton pigments of mesotrophic and eutrophic regions of the tropical Pacific, Works Inst. Oceanol. RAN, 12, Nauka, Moskva, 131 139, (in Russian). Kornushenko G. A., Vedernikov V. I., Koblentz-Mishke O. I., Konovalov B. V., 198, Results of thin-layer chromatography application for determination of carotenoids in Black Sea phytoplankton, [in:] Functioning of pelagic communities in the tropical regions of the ocean, M. E. Vinogradov (ed.), Nauka, Moskva, 127 131. Majchrowski R., Ostrowska M., 1999, Modified relationships between the occurrence of photoprotecting carotenoids of phytoplankton and Potentially Destructive Radiation in the sea, Oceanologia, 41 (4), 589 599. Majchrowski R., Woźniak B., Dera J., Ficek D., Kaczmarek S., Ostrowska M., Koblentz-Mishke O. I., 2, Model of the in vivo spectral absorption of algal pigments. Part 2. Practical applications of the model, Oceanologia, 42 (2), 191 22. Newton J., 1992a, tt7 par, U.S.JGOFSDataSystem, Newton J., 1992b, tt8 par, U. S. JGOFS Data System, Newton J., 1992c, tt11 par, U. S. JGOFS Data System, Olaizola M., 1996, High performance liquid chromatography, [in:] Ooms M. C. (ed.), (op. cit.), 363 382. Ooms M. C. (ed.), 1996, ULISSE (Underwater Light Seatruth Satellite Experiment), Commiss. Europ. Union Joint Res. Centre, Ispra, Italy, Spec. pub., 1.96.29, 56 pp. Semenova M. A., 1975, Investigation of marine phytoplankton carotenoids, Ph.D. thesis, IB RAN, Leningrad, (in Russian). Steemann Nielsen E., 1975, Marine photosynthesis, with special emphasis on the ecological aspect, Elsevier, Amsterdam New York, 141 pp., Timofeyev N. A., 1983, Radiation regime of the ocean, Nauk. Dumka, Kiyev, 247 pp., (in Russian).

Influence of photo- and chromatic acclimation on pigment composition... 175 Woźniak B., Dera J., Ficek D., Majchrowski R., Kaczmarek S., Ostrowska M., Koblentz-Mishke O. I., 2, Model of the in vivo spectral absorption of algal pigments. Part 1. Mathematical apparatus, Oceanologia, 42 (2), 177 19. Woźniak B., Dera J., Ficek D., Majchrowski R., Kaczmarek S., Ostrowska M., Koblentz-Mishke O. I, 1999, Modelling the influence of acclimation on the absorption properties of marine phytoplankton, Oceanologia 41 (2), 187 21. Woźniak B., Dera J., Koblentz-Mishke O. I., 1992, Bio-optical relationships for estimating primary production in the Ocean, Oceanologia, 33, 5 38. Woźniak B., Dera J., Majchrowski R., Ficek D., Koblentz-Mishke O. I., Darecki M., 1997, IO PAS initial model of marine primary production for remote sensing application, Oceanologia, 39 (4), 377 395. Zvalinsky V. I., 1986, Principles of influence of light intensity and spectral composition on marine phytoplankton, Ph. D. thesis (2nd degree), Akad. Nauk Beloruskoy SSR, Minsk, (in Russian).