Recent results from Super-Kamiokande

Similar documents
( Some of the ) Lateset results from Super-Kamiokande

Solar and atmospheric ν s

Super-Kamiokande ~The Status of n Oscillation ~

Atmospheric neutrinos with Super-Kamiokande S.Mine (University of California, Irvine) for Super-Kamiokande collaboration

Introduction to Super-K and Hyper-K. Roger Wendell Kyoto U. High-Energy Group Meeting

Recent Results from T2K and Future Prospects

PoS(NOW2016)003. T2K oscillation results. Lorenzo Magaletti. INFN Sezione di Bari

Status and Neutrino Oscillation Physics Potential of the Hyper-Kamiokande Project in Japan

Neutrino Oscillations and the Matter Effect

Available online at ScienceDirect. Physics Procedia 61 (2015 ) K. Okumura

Super-Kamiokande (on the activities from 2000 to 2006 and future prospects)

Recent results from Super-Kamiokande

Search for Astrophysical Neutrino Point Sources at Super-Kamiokande

Neutrino oscillation physics potential of Hyper-Kamiokande

MINOS. Luke A. Corwin, for MINOS Collaboration Indiana University XIV International Workshop On Neutrino Telescopes 2011 March 15

PoS(NEUTEL2015)009. Recent Results from Super-Kamiokande. Masayuki Nakahata for the Super-Kamiokande collaboration

Recent T2K results on CP violation in the lepton sector

Recent results on neutrino oscillations and CP violation measurement in Neutrinos

EXPLORING PARTICLE-ANTIPARTICLE ASYMMETRY IN NEUTRINO OSCILLATION. Atsuko K. Ichikawa, Kyoto University

Recent Results from K2K. Masashi Yokoyama (Kyoto U.) For K2K collaboration 2004 SLAC Summer Institute

The Hyper-Kamiokande project

New Results for ν µ ν e oscillations in MINOS

Sinergie fra ricerche con neutrini da acceleratore e atmosferici

The Hyper-Kamiodande Project A New Adventure in n Physics

T2K and other long baseline experiments (bonus: reactor experiments) Justyna Łagoda

Recent Results from Alysia Marino, University of Colorado at Boulder Neutrino Flux Workshop, University of Pittsburgh, Dec 6 8,2012

NEW νe Appearance Results from the. T2K Experiment. Matthew Malek Imperial College London. University of Birmingham HEP Seminar 13 June 2012

PoS(FPCP2017)024. The Hyper-Kamiokande Project. Justyna Lagoda

Neutrino Experiments: Lecture 2 M. Shaevitz Columbia University

Neutrino Experiments with Reactors

Latest Results from MINOS and MINOS+ Will Flanagan University of Texas on behalf of the MINOS+ Collaboration

Neutrino Oscillations

GADZOOKS! project at Super-Kamiokande

SK Atmospheric neutrino. Choji Saji ICRR,Univ. of Tokyo for the Super-Kamiokande collaboration

Super-K Gd. M.Ikeda(ICRR) for Super-K collaboration Workshop for Neutrino Programs with facilities in Japan

Long Baseline Neutrinos

Prospects of Reactor ν Oscillation Experiments

Proton Decays. -- motivation, status, and future prospect -- Univ. of Tokyo, Kamioka Observatory Masato Shiozawa

M.Nakahata. Kamioka observatory ICRR/IPMU, Univ. of Tokyo. 2016/11/8 M. Nakahata: Neutrino experiments - 30 years at Kamioka 1

Lessons from Neutrinos in the IceCube Deep Core Array

Measuring the neutrino mass hierarchy with atmospheric neutrinos in IceCube(-Gen2)

Test of Non-Standard Interactions at Super-K

Analyzing Data. PHY310: Lecture 16. Road Map

Atmospheric Neutrinos and Neutrino Oscillations

N u P J-PARC Seminar August 20, 2015

Potential of Hyper-Kamiokande at some non-accelerator Physics and Nucleon Decay Searches

NEUTRINOS II The Sequel

Neutrinos From The Sky and Through the Earth

A study on different configurations of Long Baseline Neutrino Experiment

Gadolinium Doped Water Cherenkov Detectors

Results from T2K. Alex Finch Lancaster University ND280 T2K

Neutrino Mass Hierarchy and other physics in H 2 0 (ORCA & PINGU) Aart Heijboer Nikhef, Amsterdam, KM3NeT collaboration

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 14 Jan 2016

The T2K experiment Results and Perspectives. PPC2017 Corpus Christi Mai 2017 Michel Gonin On behalf of the T2K collaboration

Latest results from NOvA

PoS(NEUTEL2015)037. The NOvA Experiment. G. Pawloski University of Minnesota Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA

UNIT1: Experimental Evidences of Neutrino Oscillation Atmospheric and Solar Neutrinos

Neutrino Oscillation and CP violation

From Here to a Neutrino Factory: Neutrino Oscillations Now and Again

arxiv:hep-ex/ v1 1 Oct 1998

Study of solar neutrino energy spectrum above 4.5 MeV in Super Kamiokande I

IceCube Results & PINGU Perspectives

1 Introduction. 2 Nucleon Decay Searches

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 11 May 2017

UNO: Underground Nucleon Decay and Neutrino Observatory

The Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment

Upward Showering Muons in Super-Kamiokande

Daya Bay and joint reactor neutrino analysis

Recent Nucleon Decay Results from Super-Kamiokande

T2K neutrino oscillation results

AN EXPERIMENTAL OVERVIEW OF NEUTRINO PHYSICS. Kate Scholberg, Duke University TASI 2008, Boulder, CO

Showering Muons in Super Kamiokande. Scott Locke University of California, Irvine August 7 th, 2017

Camillo Mariani Center for Neutrino Physics, Virginia Tech

Recent results from MiniBooNE on neutrino oscillations

PoS(FPCP2017)023. Latest results from T2K. Jennifer Teresa Haigh, for the T2K Collaboration

Recent Discoveries in Neutrino Oscillation Physics & Prospects for the Future

K2K and T2K experiments

Review of νe Appearance Oscillation Experiments

Indication of ν µ ν e appearance in the T2K EXPERIMENT

Oscillations on Ice Tyce DeYoung Department of Physics Pennsylvania State University Exotic Physics with Neutrino Telescopes Marseilles April 5, 2013

Results from the OPERA experiment in the CNGS beam

Neutrino Oscillation Tomography

Indirect searches for dark matter particles with the Super-Kamiokande detector

KamLAND. Studying Neutrinos from Reactor

Atmospheric Neutrinos MINOS MINOS Far Detector Type of Atmospheric Neutrinos at MINOS Two MINOS Atmospheric Analyses.

Measurement of q 13 in Neutrino Oscillation Experiments. Stefan Roth, RWTH Aachen Seminar, DESY, 21 st /22 nd January 2014

Super-Kamiokande. Roger Wendell, Duke University NNN 2010 Toyama, Japan

Neutrino interaction systematic errors in MINOS and NOvA

Overview of Reactor Neutrino

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 14 May 2015

PHYS 5326 Lecture #6. 1. Neutrino Oscillation Formalism 2. Neutrino Oscillation Measurements

Neutrino Experiments: Lecture 3 M. Shaevitz Columbia University

Solar spectrum. Nuclear burning in the sun produce Heat, Luminosity and Neutrinos. pp neutrinos < 0.4 MeV

1. Neutrino Oscillations

(a) (c)

The NOνA Experiment and the Future of Neutrino Oscillations

Neutrino Physics: Lecture 1

What If U e3 2 < 10 4? Neutrino Factories and Other Matters

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 25 Aug 2015

Chart of Elementary Particles

Transcription:

Recent results from Super-Kamiokande ~ atmospheric neutrino ~ Yoshinari Hayato ( Kamioka, ICRR, U-Tokyo ) for the Super-Kamiokande collaboration 1

41.4m Super-Kamiokande detector 50000 tons Ring imaging Water Cherenkov detector Fiducial volume : 22.5 ktons 1000m under the ground Inner detector Outer detector 11129 20 PMTs 1885 8 PMTs 39m About 40% of the inner detector is covered by the sensitive area of PMT. Operation started in Apr. 1996. 2

Super-Kamiokande detector History of the SK detector SK-I April 1996 ~ June 2001 SK-II October 2002 ~ October 2005 SK-III June 2006 ~ September 2008 SK-IV September 2008 ~ running 11146 ID PMTs (40% coverage) SK-I SK-II SK-III SK-IV Acrylic (front) + FRP (back) 5182 ID PMTs (19% coverage) 11129 ID PMTs (40% coverage) Electronics Upgrade 3

41.4m Physics in Super-Kamiokande Neutrino oscillation Accelerator neutrinos Atmospheric neutrinos Solar neutrinos GUT Proton decay p e + + p 0 p K + + n New physics WIMP search n-n oscillation dinucleon decay etc. Neutrino astrophysics Super nova burst neutrino Super nova relic neutrino 39m 4

Neutrino mixing parameter measurements Normal hierarchy Inverted hierarchy Δm 2 21 = 7. 49 +0.19 0.17 10 3 2 2 ev/c 2 Δm 32 ~2. 5 ± 0. 2 10 3 2 2 ev/c 2 Δm 32 ~2. 5 ± 0. 2 10 3 2 2 ev/c Δm 2 21 = 7. 49 +0.19 0.17 10 3 2 2 ev/c Remaining questions sin 2 q 12 ~ 0.305±0.013 sin 2 2q 13 = 0.098 ± 0.013 1) q 23 is really 45 o or < 45 o or >45 o? Current uncertainty of sin 2 q 23 is still large ~ 10% level sin 2 q 23 = 0. 514 ± 0. 055 ( T2K 2014 ) 2) CP is violated or not ( d = 0 or not )? 3) Mass hierarchy ~ which is heavier? ( Dm 2 32 > 0 or < 0?) 5

Neutrino oscillation probability ~ n m to n e oscillation q 13 Leading term CPV a a For anti neutrinos, a -a, d -d a Now, q 13 is known to be ( quite ) large. There are chances to observe the contributions from mass hierarchy and CPV ( d )! 6

Recent results from Reactor & T2K n e appearance clearly observed in T2K Reconstructed n energy Data Best fit No oscillation Allowed region of δ CP for each sin 2 2θ 13 Extracted sin 2 2q 31 is slightly larger than the ones from reactor experiments sin 2 2q 13 = +0.038 0.140 0.032 +0.044 0.170 0.037 ( normal hierarchy ) ( inverted hierarchy ) Indication of non-zero d CP? 7

Characteristics of atmospheric neutrino Primary cosmic ray ( p, He.. ) atmosphere Generation height 10~30km p ±, K ± μ ± n m e ± Atmospheric n energy spectrum n m /n e ~ 2 ( < ~1 GeV ) n m /n e > 2 ( > ~1 GeV ) n m n e Atmospheric neutrino energy spectrum Peaked at ~ several hundreds of MeV, Extended > TeV Neutrino travel length from ~ 10 km to 13,000 km Zenith angle corresponds to travel length of neutrinos. 8

Atmospheric neutrino ~ event topology in SK Fully Contained (FC) Average energies FC: ~ 1 GeV PC: ~ 10 GeV UpMu: ~ 100 GeV Partially Contained (PC) Upward-going Muons (Up-m)

Atmospheric neutrino ~ Analysis samples in SK Fully Contained (FC) Zenith angle distribution of each sample Partially Contained (PC) Upward-going Muons (Up-m) In total 19 analysis samples (classified by ν flavors, event topologies, energies, ) Fit to the data in bins of cosq zenith and momentum Dominated by ν µ ν τ oscillations Interested in sub-dominant contributions Three-flavor effects, Sterile Neutrinos, LIV,

Neutrino oscillation studies using atmospheric n Evidence for n t Appearance at Super-K SK-I+II+III : 2806 days Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 181802 (2013) Fitted Excess Atm n BKG MC Search for events ~ hadronic decay of t lepton Multi-ring e-like events ~ mostly DIS interactions Actual event selection performed by neural network Total efficiency ~ 60% Negligible primary n t flux ~ n t must be oscillation-induced Expected only in upward-going b = 0 : no n t Result Background DIS (g) Signal SK-I+II+III 0.94 0.02 1.10 0.05 1.42 0.35 180.1 ±44.3 (stat) +17.8-15.2 (sys) events ~ 3.8 s excess (Expected 2.7 s significance )

Neutrino oscillation studies using atmospheric n High statistics atmospheric neutrino data ~ Possibility in observing small distortion in n e Matter effect ~ from mass hierarchy Possible n e enhancement in several GeV passed through the earth core Solar term ~ from q 23 octant degeneracy Possible n e enhancement in sub-gev Interference CP phase could be studied. n e flux ratio ( f (osc.) / f (no-osc.) ) sin 2 q 23 = 0.5 sin 2 2q 13 = 0.1 Interference Difference in # of electron events: Solar term Matter effect Solar term Interference Matter 12

Neutrino oscillation studies using atmospheric n Expected Sensitivity Hierarchy Sensitivity ( True : NH ) Owing to the broad energy spectrum and baseline, atmospheric neutrino has sensitivity to the mass hierarchy. However, sensitivity to the mass hierarchy has rather strong relation with the other oscillation parameters. As a function of the true value of sin 2 q 23, this plot shows the ability to reject the inverted mass hierarchy hypothesis assuming the normal hierarchy

Neutrino oscillation studies using atmospheric n Changes and Updates to Oscillation Analyses 1775 days of SK-IV data: 4581.4 days total (282.2 kton yrs) Addition of a new analysis sample Fully contained Multi-Ring e-like other = not-n e & not-n e Multi-Ring e-like Sample Purities Purity CC n e CCn m CCn t NC n-like 72.2% 8.3% 3.2% 16.1% n -like 75.0% 6.5% 2.8% 15.6% other 30.9% 33.4% 5.1% 30.5% Prediction n m n t Osc. n/ n Separated Samples New Sample Improved systematic error treatments Updates to cross-section, FSI, detector systematics, 2p-2h (MEC)

Neutrino oscillation studies using atmospheric n q 13 Fixed Analysis (NH+IH) SK Only q 13 fixed to PDG average uncertainty is included as a systematic error Preliminary SK Normal Hierarchy SK Inverted Hierarchy Fit (517 dof) c2 q 13 d cp q 23 Dm 23 (x10-3 ) SK (NH) 559.8 0.025 3.84 0.57 2.6 SK (IH) 560.7 0.025 3.84 0.57 2.5 Offset in these curves shows the difference in the hierarchies

Neutrino oscillation studies using atmospheric n q 13 Fixed Analysis (NH+IH) SK Only Normal hierarchy favored but c 2 IH c 2 NH = - 0.9 Not a significant preference Previous results (2013 Summer) favored inverted hierarchy by Dc 2 ~ 1.5 Preliminary SK Normal SK Inverted Preliminary PDG 2013 Driven by excess of upward-going e-like consistent with the effects of q 13 Primarily in SK-IV data New multi-ring e-like sample also pulls the fit towards the NH Fit for q 13 now weakly favors q 13 > 0 Rejection of d cp ~ 60º driven by excess in Sub-GeV electron events Constraint is consistent with sensitivity Inverted Normal Preliminary

Neutrino oscillation studies using atmospheric n Introduction of External Constraint Constraints from the other experiments, ( especially, Dm 2 and sin 2 q 23 ), make it possible to improve sensitivity to mass hierarchy. Fit the T2K n m and n e data sets with SK atmospheric neutrino data. Use publicly available T2K information and results. Simulate T2K using SK tools ( not a joint result of the T2K and the SK collaborations ) Hierarchy Sensitivity NH True SK + T2Kn m, n e SK Alone

Neutrino oscillation studies using atmospheric n q 13 Fixed SK + T2K n m, n e (External Constraint) Normal Hierarchy Preliminary SK Atmospheric n T2K n m,n e Constraint SK+T2K n m,n e Constraint Fit (543 dof) c2 q 13 d cp q 23 Dm 23 (x10-3 ) SK + T2K (NH) 578.2 0.025 4.19 0.55 2.5 SK + T2K (IH) 579.4 0.025 4.19 0.55 2.5 c 2 IH c 2 NH = -1.2 (-0.9 SK only ) sind cp = 0 is still allowed at (at least) 90% C.L. for both hierarchies.

Neutron tagging ~ For further improvements ~ Effective neutron tagging make it possible to 1) discriminate n and n interactions more efficiently 2) reduce background of proton decay Compare: 204.8 ms Phys Rev. C 15 (1977) 1636 Electronics in SK-IV store all PMT hits for 500 msec after a neutrino-like trigger. Search for the 2.2 MeV gamma from p(n,g)d Actual search is performed with a neural network ( 16 variables ) Data and MC show good agreement on atmospheric neutrino sample t0 = n interaction time Preliminary Geant3 2.2 MeV g Selection Efficiency 20.5% Background / Event 0.018 19

Sterile neutrino oscillations in atmospheric neutrino Sterile Neutrino searches at SK Independent from the sterile Dm 2 and the # of sterile neutrinos. MNS Sterile a) 3+1 and 3+N models have the same signatures b) For Dm s2 ~ 1 ev 2 oscillations appear fast < sin2 Dm 2 L/E > ~ 0.5 U m4 2 Induces a decrease in event rate of m-like data of all energies and zenith angles U t4 2 Shape distortion of angular distribution of higher energy m-like data U m4 2 at 5s sensitivity U t4 2 at 5s sensitivity Limits on sterile neutrino mixing using atmospheric neutrinos in Super-Kamiokande K. Abe et al., PHYSICAL REVIEW D 91, 052019 (2015)

Sterile neutrino oscillations in atmospheric neutrino Assuming sterile neutrinos experience vacuum oscillation, ( = turning off sterile matter effects ), while preserving standard three-flavor oscillations provides a pure measurement of U m4 2 (3) P ee = P ee, (3), P eμ = 1 U μ4 2 Peμ 2 (3) P μe = 1 U μ4 Pμe, m survival probability P μμ = 2 1 U 2 (3) μ4 P μμ + U μ4 4 Suppression due to existence of sterile n Black Without Sterile Red With Sterile U μ4 2 = 0.0058 *) Infinite width for same L/E ~ n e CC matter effects

Sterile neutrino oscillations in atmospheric neutrino Sterile vacuum oscillation Limits on sterile neutrino mixing using atmospheric neutrinos in Super-Kamiokande K. Abe et al., Phys. Rev. D 91, 052019 (2015) U m4 2 < 0.041 at 90% C.L.(*) SK-I~IV data ( 4438 days) MiniBooNE + SciBooNE PRD86, 052009 (2012) SK CCFR PRL. 52, 1384 (1984) (*) Limit is valid for Dm 41 > 0.1 ev 2

Summary n t appearance 180.1 ±44.3 (stat) +17.8-15.2 (sys) events( 3.8s ) Three-Flavor neutrino oscillation analysis Using data from SKI to IV ( 4538 days ), ~1 s preference for the NH, and second octant Neutron tagging Data taken with SK-IV electronics, we developed new neutron tagging analysis tools. Efficiency ~ 20.5 % Will be used for atmospheric neutrino oscillation analyses and proton decay search. No indication of oscillations into sterile neutrinos For 3+N models U m4 2 < 0.041 at 90% C.L. 23

fin. 24

Neutrino oscillation studies using atmospheric n Searching for Three-Flavor Effects: Oscillation probabilities ~100 km P(n m n m ) P(n m n e ) ~10,000 km Sub-GeV Multi-GeV Resonant oscillations between 2-10 GeV ( Multi-GeV region ) for n or n depending upon MH, No oscillations from downward-going neutrinos above ~5 GeV No oscillations above 200 GeV, No n m n e appearance above ~20 GeV, Expect effects in most analysis samples, largest in upward-going n e

Neutrino oscillation studies using atmospheric n Oscillation Effects on Analysis Subsamples P(n m n m ) ~100 km Ratio to two-flavor oscillations Sub-GeV m-like 0 dcy-e sin 2 q 23 = 0.6 sin 2 q 23 = 0.5 sin 2 q 23 = 0.4 Multi-ring m-like 0 dcy-e ~10,000 km sin 2 q 23 = 0.6 sin 2 q 23 = 0.5 sin 2 q 23 = 0.4

Neutrino oscillation studies using atmospheric n Oscillation Effects on Analysis Subsamples P(n m n e ) ~100 km Ratio to two-flavor oscillations Sub-GeV e-like 0-dcy e d cp = 3p/2 d cp = p/2 Multi-ring e-like n e Sub-GeV ~10,000 km Multi-GeV Appearance effects are roughly halved for the inverted hierarchy. sin 2 q 23 = 0.6 sin 2 q 23 = 0.5 sin 2 q 23 = 0.4

Atmospheric neutrino ~ Analysis samples in SK FC Sub-GeV 1-ring e-like 0 decay electron 1 decay electron p 0 like 0 decay electron m-like 1 decay electron 2 decay electron 2-rings p 0 like Multi-GeV 1-ring e-like 0 decay electron m-like with decay electron multi-ring e-like n e -like n e -like others m-like 28

Atmospheric neutrino ~ Analysis samples in SK PC OD stopping OD through going Up-going m Stopping Through going showering Through going non-showering 29

Sterile neutrino oscillations in atmospheric neutrino Assuming q 13 = q 12 = 0, P μμ = 1 U μ4 2 2 1 sin 2 2θ m sin 2 (E m L) + U μ4 4, E 2 m = Δ 32 2 4E 2 + A s 2 + 2A 32 A s cos 2θ 23 2θ s, sinθ m = A 32 sin 2θ 23 +A s sin 2θ s E m, A s = U μ4 2 + Uτ4 2 2 m survival probability U μ4 2 = 0.0018, Uτ4 2 = 0.33 Suppression