PoS(NEUTEL2015)009. Recent Results from Super-Kamiokande. Masayuki Nakahata for the Super-Kamiokande collaboration

Similar documents
Recent results from Super-Kamiokande

Recent Results from T2K and Future Prospects

Neutrino Experiments: Lecture 2 M. Shaevitz Columbia University

Recent results from Super-Kamiokande

GADZOOKS! project at Super-Kamiokande

Super-K Gd. M.Ikeda(ICRR) for Super-K collaboration Workshop for Neutrino Programs with facilities in Japan

Solar and atmospheric ν s

Gadolinium Doped Water Cherenkov Detectors

( Some of the ) Lateset results from Super-Kamiokande

Neutrino oscillation physics potential of Hyper-Kamiokande

PoS(FPCP2017)024. The Hyper-Kamiokande Project. Justyna Lagoda

M.Nakahata. Kamioka observatory ICRR/IPMU, Univ. of Tokyo. 2016/11/8 M. Nakahata: Neutrino experiments - 30 years at Kamioka 1

Neutrino Oscillations

Super-Kamiokande (on the activities from 2000 to 2006 and future prospects)

Solar spectrum. Nuclear burning in the sun produce Heat, Luminosity and Neutrinos. pp neutrinos < 0.4 MeV

Recent T2K results on CP violation in the lepton sector

Super-Kamiokande ~The Status of n Oscillation ~

MINOS. Luke A. Corwin, for MINOS Collaboration Indiana University XIV International Workshop On Neutrino Telescopes 2011 March 15

Search for sterile neutrino mixing in the muon neutrino to tau neutrino appearance channel with the OPERA detector

Available online at ScienceDirect. Physics Procedia 61 (2015 ) K. Okumura

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 14 May 2015

Introduction to Super-K and Hyper-K. Roger Wendell Kyoto U. High-Energy Group Meeting

New Results from the MINOS Experiment

UNIT1: Experimental Evidences of Neutrino Oscillation Atmospheric and Solar Neutrinos

NEUTRINO AND ASTROPARTICLE DIVISION

PoS(NEUTEL2015)037. The NOvA Experiment. G. Pawloski University of Minnesota Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA

The Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment

Solar Neutrino Oscillations

Particle Physics. Michaelmas Term 2009 Prof Mark Thomson. Handout 11 : Neutrino Oscillations. Neutrino Experiments

Study of solar neutrino energy spectrum above 4.5 MeV in Super Kamiokande I

PoS(NOW2016)003. T2K oscillation results. Lorenzo Magaletti. INFN Sezione di Bari

Neutrino Oscillations and the Matter Effect

EXPLORING PARTICLE-ANTIPARTICLE ASYMMETRY IN NEUTRINO OSCILLATION. Atsuko K. Ichikawa, Kyoto University

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 11 May 2017

NEW νe Appearance Results from the. T2K Experiment. Matthew Malek Imperial College London. University of Birmingham HEP Seminar 13 June 2012

Search for Astrophysical Neutrino Point Sources at Super-Kamiokande

1. Neutrino Oscillations

Long Baseline Neutrinos

Particle Physics: Neutrinos part I

Measurement of q 13 in Neutrino Oscillation Experiments. Stefan Roth, RWTH Aachen Seminar, DESY, 21 st /22 nd January 2014

The Hyper-Kamiodande Project A New Adventure in n Physics

The future of neutrino physics (at accelerators)

The Search for θ13 : First Results from Double Chooz. Jaime Dawson, APC

Recent results on neutrino oscillations and CP violation measurement in Neutrinos

The Hyper-Kamiokande project

New results from RENO and prospects with RENO-50

New Results for ν µ ν e oscillations in MINOS

Results from T2K. Alex Finch Lancaster University ND280 T2K

Potential of Hyper-Kamiokande at some non-accelerator Physics and Nucleon Decay Searches

Correlated Background measurement in Double Chooz experiment

Neutrinos From The Sky and Through the Earth

Neutrinos: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow. Stanley Wojcicki SLAC Summer Institute 2010 August 13, 2010

Recent Results from Alysia Marino, University of Colorado at Boulder Neutrino Flux Workshop, University of Pittsburgh, Dec 6 8,2012

PoS(EPS-HEP2015)068. The PINGU detector

Atmospheric neutrinos with Super-Kamiokande S.Mine (University of California, Irvine) for Super-Kamiokande collaboration

PoS(FPCP2017)023. Latest results from T2K. Jennifer Teresa Haigh, for the T2K Collaboration

Measuring the neutrino mass hierarchy with atmospheric neutrinos in IceCube(-Gen2)

This is a repository copy of Astroparticle Physics in Hyper-Kamiokande.

Neutrino Oscillation Measurements, Past and Present. Art McDonald Queen s University And SNOLAB

Neutrino Experiments with Reactors

Neutrino Oscillations

Status and Perspectives for KM3NeT/ORCA

New Results from RENO


1 Introduction. 2 Nucleon Decay Searches

Neutrino Oscillation and CP violation

Status and prospects of neutrino oscillations

Radio-chemical method

Analyzing Data. PHY310: Lecture 16. Road Map

Long baseline experiments

T2K and other long baseline experiments (bonus: reactor experiments) Justyna Łagoda

Neutrino oscillation experiments: Recent results and implications

Neutrino Oscillations

Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, 567 Wilson Rd., East Lansing, MI 48824, USA

Neutrino mixing II. Can ν e ν µ ν τ? If this happens:

Showering Muons in Super Kamiokande. Scott Locke University of California, Irvine August 7 th, 2017

Status of Solar Neutrino Oscillations

Atmospheric Neutrinos and Neutrino Oscillations

Neutrino Mass How can something so small be so important? Greg Sullivan University of Maryland April 1999

arxiv:hep-ex/ v1 1 Oct 1998

NEUTRINOS II The Sequel

Recent oscillation analysis results from Daya Bay

Recent Discoveries in Neutrino Oscillation Physics & Prospects for the Future

Proton decay and neutrino astrophysics with the future LENA detector

PMT Signal Attenuation and Baryon Number Violation Background Studies. By: Nadine Ayoub Nevis Laboratories, Columbia University August 5, 2011

C02: Investigation of Supernova Mechanism via Neutrinos. Mark Vagins Kavli IPMU, UTokyo

Status and Neutrino Oscillation Physics Potential of the Hyper-Kamiokande Project in Japan

Proton Decays. -- motivation, status, and future prospect -- Univ. of Tokyo, Kamioka Observatory Masato Shiozawa

ν?? Solar & Atmospheric Oscillation Experiments Greg Sullivan University of Maryland Aspen Winter Conference January 21, 1999 )Past )Present )Future

Accelerator Neutrino Experiments News from Neutrino 2010 Athens

Unbound Neutrino Roadmaps. MARCO LAVEDER Università di Padova e INFN NOW September 2006

Review of Neutrino Oscillation Experiments

Detectors for astroparticle physics

Neutrino Oscillations

IceCube Results & PINGU Perspectives

A method for detecting ν τ appearance in the spectra of quasielastic CC events

From Here to a Neutrino Factory: Neutrino Oscillations Now and Again

Recent Results from K2K. Masashi Yokoyama (Kyoto U.) For K2K collaboration 2004 SLAC Summer Institute

Neutrino Mass Hierarchy and other physics in H 2 0 (ORCA & PINGU) Aart Heijboer Nikhef, Amsterdam, KM3NeT collaboration

N u P J-PARC Seminar August 20, 2015

Transcription:

Recent Results from Super-Kamiokande for the Super-Kamiokande collaboration Kamioka Observatory, Institute for Cosmic Ray Research, University of Tokyo Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe (WPI), University of Tokyo E-mail: nakahata@suketto.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp Recent results from the study of atmospheric neutrinos and solar neutrinos and from searches for sterile neutrinos and dark matter at Super-Kamiokande are presented. In addition, a feasibility study for dissolving gadolinium in the detector for a supernova relic neutrino measurement is presented. XVI International Workshop on Neutrino Telescopes, 2-6 March 2015 Palazzo Franchetti? Istituto Veneto, Venice, Italy Speaker. c Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike Licence. http://pos.sissa.it/

1. Introduction Super-Kamiokande (SK) is a 50-kton water Cherenkov detector that has 11,000 20-inchdiameter photomultipliers (PMTs) in an inner detector and 1,885 8-inch-diameter PMTs in an outer detector[1]. Data collection by SK was started in April 1996, and it is now running the fourth phase of its operation, begun in 2008. Oscillations of atmospheric and solar neutrinos were discovered at SK in 1998 and 2001, respectively. Since then, precise measurements of these neutrinos have been performed and various aspects of neutrino oscillations have been unraveled, such as the appearance of ν τ from atmospheric neutrinos [2] and the day/night difference of the solar neutrino flux [3]. SK has been obtaining data for nearly twenty years and is still the world s largest neutrino detector, covering an energy range from a few MeV to tens of GeV. In this presentation, recent results from the study of atmospheric and solar neutrinos as well as new analyses on the searches for sterile neutrinos and dark matter are presented. 2. Atmospheric Neutrinos Cosmic rays interact with air nuclei, producing showers of particles. The decay of secondary pions and kaons, created in the cosmic ray interactions, produce atmospheric neutrinos. Neutrinos travel,000 km before being detected. Both ν µ and ν e are produced in the atmosphere. At lower energy, the ratio ν µ /ν e is almost two, which is determined by the decay scheme of pions. Both neutrinos and anti-neutrinos are produced, with 30% of observed data being anti-neutrinos, which is mainly determined by the difference in their cross sections. The flux of atmospheric neutrinos spans many decades in energy, 0 MeV 0 TeV. Because of these characteristics, atmospheric neutrinos are an excellent tool for broad studies of neutrino oscillations. Atmospheric neutrino oscillations are interpreted as ν µ ν τ oscillations because of the deficit of ν µ and the lack of strong deviation from the expectation for ν e. Since the cross section of ν τ charged-current (CC) interaction is small, it has not been easy to obtain a signature of ν τ. However, the long time-period observations of SK has enabled us to detect ν τ.[2] We searched for events consistent with the hadronic decay of τ leptons. They are multi-ring electron-like events with visible energies above 1.3 GeV. The production of ν τ in cosmic ray interactions is negligible, so if ν τ are observed, they must be oscillation induced and must be upward-going events. A neural network (NN) method was adopted for this search and an NN variable was defined using the variables that characterize τ lepton decay. On a two-dimensional plane of the NN variable and the zenith angle (cos(θ zenith )), the obtained data were fitted with background and expected signal distributions. Figure 1 shows the zenith angle distribution of τ-like events (NN variable >0.5). A clear excess of τ signal is seen in the upward-going bins. The excess corresponds to the observed number of 180.1±44.3(stat.) 17.8 15.2 (sys.) τ-cc events, which is a 3.8σ excess and 1.42±0.35 times the expected number from the best fit oscillation parameters. A study of the neutrino oscillation parameters of m 2 32, sin2 θ 23, δcp, and mass hierarchy was performed using 4581 days of data taken until 2014. More than 47,500 atmospheric neutrino events were observed during this time and the events are subdivided by event topology (fully-contained, partially-contained and upward-going µ), energy range (sub-gev and multi-gev), e- or µ-like and the number of rings. Multi-GeV e-like samples are further subdivided into ν-like and ν-like

Fitted Excess Atm n BKG MC SK-I+II+III : 2806 days Figure 1: Zenith angle distribution of τ-like events. The fitted τ signal and background from other atmospheric neutrino interactions are shown in gray and white, respectively. 95% Dm 2 32, Dm 2 13 ev 2 95% sin 2 q 23 4581 days 95% Preliminary SK Inverted Hierarchy SK Normal Hierarchy Figure 2: χ 2 distribution of oscillation parameters obtained from SK data. The black and blue curves show inverted and normal hierarchies, respectively. samples in order to discriminate the mass hierarchy. The obtained oscillation parameters using only SK data are shown in Fig.2. In this analysis, θ 13 is fixed to the average value of the Particle Data Group (PDG), which is essentially determined by short baseline reactor experiments. The black and blue curves in the figure show the inverted and normal hierarchies, respectively, and their relative difference shows the preference of the mass hierarchy. The normal hierarchy is favored at the level of χ 2 = 0.9. Two dimensional contours of m 2 32 and sin2 θ 23 are shown in Fig.3 together with T2K results from ν µ disappearance data and MINOS beam+atmospheric ν data. T2K and MINOS give a better resolution for m 2 32 than SK atmospheric ν, and T2K also gives a better measurement for sin 2 θ 23. It is therefore expected that an analysis of the SK atmospheric data constrained with the T2K data should give a better measurement of δcp and mass hierarchy. The plots in Figure 4 demonstrate this. The light blue curves are obtained from SK data constraining by the T2K data. This plot is for normal hierarchy and a similar plot is obtained for inverted hierarchy. The minimum χ 2 of these cases were compared and the normal hierarchy is favored at the level of χ 2 = 1.2. The range of disfavored δcp increases, but CP conservation (sin(δcp) = 0) is still dcp

Dm 2 32 (ev 2 ) Dm 2 32 (ev 2 ) Super-Kamiokande Super-K Atm. n T2K n m Run1-4 MINOS Beam+ Atm 3f Preliminary Normal Hierarchy Inverted Hierarchy sin 2 q 23 sin 2 q 23 Figure 3: contours of m 2 32 and sin2 θ 23 obtained from SK atmospheric neutrino data (red), T2K ν µ disappearance data (light blue) and MINOS beam+atmospheric ν data (purple) for the normal (left) and inverted (right) hierarchies. Dc 2 Dm 2 32, Dm 2 13 ev 2 sin 2 q 23 SK Atm SK+T2K n m,n e Constraint T2K n m,n e Constraint Figure 4: χ 2 distribution of oscillation parameters obtained from SK atmospheric ν data (black), T2K data (purple dotted) and SK data constrained with T2K data (light blue). The normal hierarchy is assumed. allowed at a C.L of at least for both hierarchies. The LSND experiment claimed a ν e appearance in a ν µ beam consistent with m 2 1 ev 2 and the MiniBooNE experiment detected anomalies that may indicate oscillation of a similar m 2. In addition, it has been suggested that measurements of reactor experiments at short distance show a deficit in the ν e flux. Also, the rate of ν e from 51 Cr and 37 Ar calibration sources in Gallium solar neutrino experiments (SAGE and GALLEX/GNO) was about 3σ lower than the expectation. In order to reconcile these observations with established atmospheric and solar neutrino oscillations, an additional (fourth) neutrino (or more) is required. Since the LEP experiments measured the number of light neutrino families to be 2.980±0.0082, the additional required neutrinos must be sterile. We have searched for sterile neutrinos which have ev 2 -scale m 2 from the 4438 live-days atmospheric neutrino data sample.[4] The standard neutrino mixing matrix, called the Pontecorvo- Maki-Nakagawa-Sakata (PMNS) matrix, was enlarged to include the fourth mass eigenstate and we searched for possible finite values of U µ4 2 and U τ4 2. If U µ4 2 has a finite value, it induces a decrease in the event rate of µ-like data for all energies and zenith angles. On the other hand, a finite value of U τ4 2 induces a shape distortion of the zenith angle distributions for higher energy dcp

Solar ν e appearance + ν e disappearance C.L. SK SK Excluded SK C.L. limit C.L. limit Recent Global Fit CHDS+MB Minos Excluded Figure 5: Limits on U µ4 2 (left) and on U µ4 2 and U τ4 2 (right) obtained from 4438 live-days atmospheric neutrino data. The left figure also shows the allowed regions obtained by a combined analysis of ν e appearance and disappearance data from [5] and an excluded region by a MineBooNE and SciNooNE combined analysis from [6]. µ-like data, e.g., a partially-contained through-going sample. The SK data can be reproduced using only the standard PMNS matrix framework and no indications of finite U µ4 2 and U τ4 2 were observed. A fully generic sterile oscillation model is difficult computationally because matter effects for both active ν e and sterile neutrinos (neutral current (NC)) must be taken into account. Hence, we performed two different analyses. The first analysis took into account ν e matter effects only and fitted only U µ4 2. This method gave the most accurate U µ4 2 limit and U µ4 2 < 0.041 (90 % C.L.) was obtained as shown in Fig.5(left). The SK limit excluded a fraction of the region allowed by the combined analysis of ν e appearance and disappearance data presented in [5]. The second analysis took into account NC matter effects only and fitted U µ4 2 and U τ4 2. The limit thus obtained is shown in Fig.5(right). 3. Indirect Dark Matter Search A search for WIMPs by detecting neutrinos produced from WIMP annihilations occurring inside the Sun has been recently performed[7] using 3903 days of SK data taken until March 2012. In contrast with our old WIMPs analysis, which used only upward-going muons, the recent analysis used all categories (fully-contained, partially-contained and upward-going muons), all energies (sub-gev and multi-gev) and all flavors (e-like and µ-like). By including lower energy neutrinos, the recent analysis has improved the sensitivity for low mass WIMPs. The signature of the neutrinos from WIMP annihilations in the Sun is an excess of events in the direction of the Sun. Angular and reconstructed momentum distributions were fitted with the atmospheric neutrino background and possible signals from WIMPs. To simulate the neutrino flux from WIMP annihilation in the Sun, the WIMPSIM 3.01 simulator was used. We searched for three annihilation channels, χχ τ + τ /b b/w + W. No significant excess was observed and limits on neutrino fluxes were obtained. The flux limits were converted to an upper limit on WIMP-nucleon cross sections using DARKSUSY 5.0.6. Figure 6 shows the obtained limits on the WIMP mass vs. cross section plane for spin-dependent (SD) and spin-independent(si) interactions. Thanks to the

] Super-Kamiokande -2 WIMP-proton SD Cross section[cm -35-36 -37-38 -39-40 -41 DAMA/LIBRA SIMPLE IceCube (bb) IceCube (τ τ /W W ) SK (bb) BAKSAN (τ τ ) SK (τ + τ - ) BAKSAN (bb) PICASSO BAKSAN (W W ) SK (W W ) 2 2 WIMP mass[gev/c ] WIMP-nucleon SI Cross section[cm -2 ] -39-40 -41-42 -43 XENON S2-only SK (τ τ ) XENON0 LUX CoGeNTCDMSlite SK (bb) CDMS II Si CRESSTII SuperCDMS IceCube (bb) DAMA/LIBRA IceCube (τ + τ - /W W ) SK (W W ) WIMP mass[gev/c 2 ] 2 Figure 6: C.L. upper limits on SD WIMP-proton (left) and SI WIMP-nucleon (right) cross sections obtained from 3903 days SK data. The default value calculated with DARKSUSY is shown as a red solid line and the bands show the range of uncertainties. hydrogen-rich composition of the Sun, a tight limit on the SD cross section was obtained, and this SK analysis placed the most stringent constraint for WIMP masses below 200 GeV/c 2 for the χχ τ + τ decay channel. For the limit on the SI cross section, this SK analysis excluded a new region for WIMP masses below 6 GeV/c 2. 4. Solar Neutrinos Because of the large fiducial mass of 22.5 kton, SK can observe 8 B solar neutrinos with quite high statistics. The observed event rate at SK is about 20 events/day and we have observed about 70,000 signal events so far. Using this high statistical data, we have performed searches for time variation of the solar neutrino flux, energy spectrum distortion due to the oscillation effect as well as precise measurement of the oscillation parameters of m 2 21 and θ 12. Figure 7 shows the yearly variation of the solar neutrino flux. The solar activity estimated from the sunspot number has changed over the last 18 years and 1.5 solar cycles have passed. However, no significant correlation between the solar neutrino flux and solar activity was observed. The χ 2 of the SK data points for the flat distribution in Fig.7 is χ 2 =13.53/17 D.O.F., which corresponds to 70% probability. The flux ratio of the data to the standard solar model (SSM) prediction obtained from 4503 days of SK data taken until January 2014 is Data/SSM = 0.4463 ± 0.0085(stat.+sys.), where the SSM is an un-oscillated flux of 5.25 6 /cm 2 /sec. ν e produced at the core of the Sun are oscillated into ν µ and ν τ, and ν e can be re-generated due to the matter effect through the Earth. This matter effect may cause a difference in the daytime and nighttime fluxes. Using the high statistical SK data, this day/night asymmetry was observed.[3] The time variation pattern during the night depends on oscillation parameters, especially m 2 21. Hence, the expected shape of the time variation was calculated and the amplitude of the variation was fitted using the extended maximum likelihood method. The obtained day/night asymmetry (A DN (day night) (day+night)/2 ) as a function of m2 21 is shown in Fig.8 together with the expected A DN. The m 2 21 range measured using KamLAND reactor neutrinos and the solar global analysis are also shown in the figure, and the observed A DN is consistent with the expectation within about the 1σ level. The A DN value for m 2 21 = 4.84 5 ev 2 is 3.3±1.0±0.5% and its non-zero significance is 3.0σ.

Day/Night asymmetry (%) Super-Kamiokande preliminary Figure 7: The red points with error bars show the yearly 8 B flux obtained by SK. The vertical axis shows the relative ratio of data and an un-oscillated MC prediction with a flux of 5.25 6 /cm 2 /sec. The errors 1 are statistical only. The gray bands show systematic errors for each SK phase. The pink band shows the SK combined flux taking into account statistical and systematic errors. The black dots show the time variation of sunspot numbers taken from [8]. Solar KamLAND(1s) expected preliminary SK-I,II,III,IV combined 1s range Dm 2 21( -5 ev 2 ) Figure 8: The band centered with the black curve shows the day/night asymmetry(a DN ) of the SK solar neutrino flux as a function of m 2 21 with the statistical error in gray and the systematic error in blue. The red curve shows the expected value of A DN. The vertical light blue and light green bands show the m 2 21 ranges measured using KamLAND reactor neutrinos and the solar global analysis, respectively. 1 The solar neutrino oscillations are vacuum -dominant and matter -dominant oscillations for lower and higher energy, respectively. Their oscillation probabilities are P 1 0.5sin 2 2θ 0.55 and P sin 2 θ 0.3, respectively. Therefore, there must be a turning point, which is expected to be at a few MeV. We are currently searching for such an energy spectrum distortion at SK. Energy spectra were generated for each SK phase and the combined energy spectrum is shown in Fig.9. We have not yet observed any spectral distortion. The original neutrino spectrum was fitted with quadratic and exponential functions, and the resultant spectrum in SK is compared with the MSW expectations with solar+kamland and solar-global oscillation parameters. The MSW expectations are disfavored with a 1.0 1.7σ level. Using the most up-to-date SK solar neutrino data as well as the latest results of other solar neutrino experiments, the allowed regions of the oscillation parameters of m 2 21 and θ 12 are obtained as shown in Fig.. In this analysis, sin 2 θ 13 is constrained to 0.0242±0.0026, obtained from the short

All SK phase are combined without regard to energy resolution or systematics in this figure (total # of bins of SKI - IV is 83) χ 2 Solar+KamLAND osc. para. 70.13 Solar Global osc. para. 68.14 quadratic fit 67.67 exponential fit 66.54 (statistic error only) preliminary Figure 9: The red points with errors show the energy spectrum of solar neutrino data combining all SK phases. The vertical axis shows the ratio of the data to the un-oscillated SSM prediction with a flux of 5.25 6 /cm 2 /sec. The brown and black histograms show fits assuming exponential and quadratic energy dependent functions in neutrino oscillation probability, respectively. The blue and green histograms show the expectations for the oscillation parameters of global analyses of solar+kamland and solar-only, respectively. χ 2 m 2 in ev 2 8 3σ 6 4 2σ 2 1σ x -5 sin 2 (Θ 12 )=0.312 +0.033-0.025 m 2 21 =(7.54+0.19-0.18) -5 ev 2 18 sin 2 (Θ 12 )=0.311±0.014 m 2 21 =(4.85+1.4-0.59) -5 ev 2 17 sin 2 (Θ 12 )=0.308±0.013 m 2 21 =(7.50+0.19-0.18) -5 ev 2 16 15 14 13 12 11 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 sin 2 (Θ 13 )=0.0242±0.0026 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 sin 2 (θ) 1σ 2σ 3σ 2 4 6 8 χ 2 Figure : Allowed region of oscillation parameters of m 2 21 and θ 12 obtained from solar global (green), KamLAND reactor (light blue) and solar+kamland(red). The best fit parameters and their 1σ errors are also shown. baseline reactor experiments. The projection of the two-dimensional contour onto the m 2 21 axis shows that there seems to be about 2σ tension between the solar-global and KamLAND reactor data in m 2 21. 5. R&D for GADZOOKS! Supernovae have been occurring since the beginning of the universe, and the neutrinos from all past supernovae exist as diffuse neutrinos in our universe, called supernova relic neutrinos (SRNs). Since the SRNs have accumulated since the beginning of the universe, they can tell us about the star formation history of the universe. The expected event rate in this energy range is about 1.3 6.7

EGADS Evaluating Gadolinium s Action on Detector Systems Transparency measurement (UDEAL) 200 m 3 test tank with 240 PMTs 15m 3 tank to dissolve Gd Gd water circulation system (purify water with Gd) Figure 11: Equipment for EGADS: 15-m 3 Gd premixing and pretreatment tank (left), selective filtration system (right), and 200-m 3 tank (center). events/year/22.5 kton. So, a large target mass like the SK detector and a new technique for high background reduction are necessary. At present, the SK detector can detect only prompt positron signals. However, if it could detect delayed neutrons then the background constraining the SRN search would be greatly reduced. Such a reduction could be achieved via coincidence detection of positrons and neutrons (in space using vertex correlation of 50 cm, and in time with 20 µs). By adding 0.2% gadolinium sulfate into the water tank, this goal can be achieved.[9] Gadolinium has a thermal neutron capture cross section of 49,000 barns (about five orders of magnitude larger than that of protons) and emits a gamma cascade at 8 MeV that can be detected by Cherenkov light. In order to obtain a efficiency for neutron capture, the Gd concentration should be 0.1%, or 0.2% if Gd 2 (SO 4 ) 3 is used. In order to study the effect of dissolving Gd in the SK tank, an R&D project called EGADS (evaluating gadolinium s action on detector systems) has been running in the Kamioka mine. A 200-m 3 stainless steel tank which mimics the SK tank has been constructed (Fig. 11). The tank is equipped with a selective water filtration system that removes impurities while retaining the Gd, a 15-m 3 Gd premixing tank, a pretreatment system to remove radioactivity, and a device to measure the water attenuation length. In summer 2013, 240 PMTs were installed in the 200-m 3 tank. Most are 20-inch PMTs of the same type used in the SK tank and a few PMTs are prototypes for Hyper-Kamiokande. The cabling and waterproofing methods are same as those used at SK. Starting from November 2014, Gd 2 (SO 4 ) 3 was dissolved in pure water at 0.2% in the 200-m 3 tank. The transparency of the Gd-loaded water was evaluated from the intensity of Cherenkov light left at a distance of 15 m, referred to as LL 15m. The LL 15m value for the Gd-loaded water was measured to be better than. More detailed studies for possible effects on other SK physics are being performed.

6. Conclusions Recent results from the study of atmospheric and solar neutrinos as well as from searches for sterile neutrinos and dark matter at SK are presented. Using the large data sample accumulated at SK, neutrino oscillation parameters and the mass hierarchy have been studied. The normal hierarchy is favored at the level of χ 2 = 0.9 using SK data alone and at χ 2 = 1.2 with SK constrained by T2K ν e and ν µ analyses. Additionally, recent progress in the analysis of atmospheric neutrinos is highlighted by evidence for the appearance of oscillation-induced ν τ, which has been obtained with 3.8 σ significance. Further, limits on sterile neutrino oscillations have been obtained. An indirect dark matter search has been performed using the atmospheric neutrino data sample. The expected signature is high energy neutrinos from the Sun, where WIMP self-annihilation produces secondary neutrinos that would appear on top of the atmospheric neutrino background. SK has placed the most stringent constraints on spin-dependent interactions on protons below 200 GeV and also set new limits on the spin-independent interactions of light WIMPs (< 6 GeV). Additionally, SK has observed almost 70,000 8 B solar neutrino events during 4504 live-days, and the stability of the solar neutrino flux has been discussed with high precision. No significant correlation with the activity of the Sun has been observed even though the data-taking period spans almost 1.5 solar cycles. A difference between the daytime and nighttime solar neutrino fluxes, which is expected from the effects of matter on neutrino oscillations in the Earth, has been observed. However, no distortion of the energy spectrum, expected from solar neutrino oscillations, has yet been observed. The value of m 2 21 obtained from the SK solar neutrino data is tension with that from KamLAND reactor neutrino measurements by about 2σ. In order to detect supernova relic neutrinos, the feasibility of dissolving gadolinium in the detector for enhanced neutron tagging was studied. A 200-ton test tank which mimics the SK detector was constructed and 0.2% Gd 2 (SO 4 ) 3 was dissolved within it. The Cherenkov light yield of the Gd-loaded water was measured to be better than and more detailed studies are on-going. References [1] Super-Kamiokande collaboration (Y. Fukuda et al.), Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A501: 418 462 (2003). [2] Super-Kamiokande collaboration (Y. Ashie et al.), Phys. Rev. Lett. 1, 181802 (2013). [3] Super-Kamiokande collaboration (A. Renshaw et al.), Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 091805 (2014). [4] K. Abe et al., Phys. Rev. D91, 052019 (2015). [5] J. Kopp et al., JHEP 1305(2013)050. [6] G. Cheng et al., Phys. Rev. D86, 052009 (2012). [7] K. Choi et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 141301 (2015). [8] http://solarscience.msfc.nasa.gov/greenwch/spot_num.txt [9] J. Beacom and M. Vagins, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 1711 (2004).