Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - RC Two Way Spanning Slab XX

Similar documents
Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Staircase BS8110

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Staircase BS8110

CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Job Title Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Column BS8110

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Beam BS8110 v Member Design - RC Beam XX

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX 22/09/2016

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Structure, Member Design - Geotechnics Pad, Strip and Raft XX

CHAPTER 4. Design of R C Beams

Annex - R C Design Formulae and Data

DESIGN OF STAIRCASE. Dr. Izni Syahrizal bin Ibrahim. Faculty of Civil Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet

Example 2.2 [Ribbed slab design]

- Rectangular Beam Design -

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar

Detailing. Lecture 9 16 th November Reinforced Concrete Detailing to Eurocode 2

Design of AAC wall panel according to EN 12602

Delhi Noida Bhopal Hyderabad Jaipur Lucknow Indore Pune Bhubaneswar Kolkata Patna Web: Ph:

CE5510 Advanced Structural Concrete Design - Design & Detailing of Openings in RC Flexural Members-

DESIGN AND DETAILING OF COUNTERFORT RETAINING WALL

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS CHAPTER 2. Introduction

Design of Beams (Unit - 8)

Bending and Shear in Beams

Figure 1: Representative strip. = = 3.70 m. min. per unit length of the selected strip: Own weight of slab = = 0.

Civil Engineering Design (1) Design of Reinforced Concrete Columns 2006/7

Case Study in Reinforced Concrete adapted from Simplified Design of Concrete Structures, James Ambrose, 7 th ed.

Structural Calculations for Juliet balconies using BALCONY 2 System (Aerofoil) handrail. Our ref: JULB2NB Date of issue: March 2017

Roadway Grade = m, amsl HWM = Roadway grade dictates elevation of superstructure and not minimum free board requirement.

SPECIFIC VERIFICATION Chapter 5

Lecture-04 Design of RC Members for Shear and Torsion

Design of reinforced concrete sections according to EN and EN

UNIVERSITY OF BOLTON SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING. BEng (HONS) CIVIL ENGINEERING SEMESTER 1 EXAMINATION 2016/2017 MATHEMATICS & STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Civil Engineering 16/05/2008

spslab v3.11. Licensed to: STRUCTUREPOINT, LLC. License ID: D2DE-2175C File: C:\Data\CSA A Kt Revised.slb

Appendix K Design Examples

PURE BENDING. If a simply supported beam carries two point loads of 10 kn as shown in the following figure, pure bending occurs at segment BC.

REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN 1. Design of Column (Examples and Tutorials)

Lecture 7 Two-Way Slabs

Practical Design to Eurocode 2. The webinar will start at 12.30

Structure, Member Design - Geotechnics Piles XX

Design of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear

Civil Engineering Design (1) Analysis and Design of Slabs 2006/7

PUNCHING SHEAR CALCULATIONS 1 ACI 318; ADAPT-PT

DESIGN REINFORCED CEMENT CONCRETE STRUCTURAL MEMBERS

Plastic design of continuous beams

Flexure: Behavior and Nominal Strength of Beam Sections

Design of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear

3.2 Reinforced Concrete Slabs Slabs are divided into suspended slabs. Suspended slabs may be divided into two groups:

Explanatory Examples for Ductile Detailing of RC Buildings

SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE DESIGN

Longitudinal strength standard


Serviceability Deflection calculation

8 Deflectionmax. = 5WL 3 384EI

Lecture-08 Gravity Load Analysis of RC Structures

DESIGN OF STEEL GRILLAGE FOUNDATION FOR AN AUDITORIUM

CHAPTER 4. Stresses in Beams

Module 6. Shear, Bond, Anchorage, Development Length and Torsion. Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur

Chapter. Materials. 1.1 Notations Used in This Chapter

Generation of Biaxial Interaction Surfaces

Design of a Multi-Storied RC Building

RAFT FOUNDATION DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE WITH BS8110:PART _FOR MULTISTOREY BUILDING (BS8110 : PART 1 : 1997)

FLOW CHART FOR DESIGN OF BEAMS


Practical Design to Eurocode 2

OUTCOME 1 - TUTORIAL 3 BENDING MOMENTS. You should judge your progress by completing the self assessment exercises. CONTENTS

SERVICEABILITY OF BEAMS AND ONE-WAY SLABS

STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS

Seismic Pushover Analysis Using AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design

Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in

Dr. Hazim Dwairi. Example: Continuous beam deflection

Comparative Study of Strengths of Two-Way Rectangular Continuous Slabs with Two Openings Parallel to Long Side and Short Side

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach

UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN ME MECHANICS OF MATERIALS I FINAL EXAM DECEMBER 13, 2008 Professor A. Dolovich

Serviceability Limit States


Visit Abqconsultants.com. This program Designs and Optimises RCC Chimney and Foundation. Written and programmed

Bridge deck modelling and design process for bridges

Pre-stressed concrete = Pre-compression concrete Pre-compression stresses is applied at the place when tensile stress occur Concrete weak in tension

NAGY GYÖRGY Tamás Assoc. Prof, PhD

FIXED BEAMS IN BENDING

ENG1001 Engineering Design 1

QUESTION BANK DEPARTMENT: CIVIL SEMESTER: III SUBJECT CODE: CE2201 SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS UNIT 1- STRESS AND STRAIN PART A

Entrance exam Master Course

Lecture-05 Serviceability Requirements & Development of Reinforcement

Steel Structures Design and Drawing Lecture Notes

Slenderness Effects for Concrete Columns in Sway Frame - Moment Magnification Method (CSA A )

9.5 Compression Members

KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK. Subject code/name: ME2254/STRENGTH OF MATERIALS Year/Sem:II / IV

Project Name Structural Calculation for Feature Pressing

Materials: engineering, science, processing and design, 2nd edition Copyright (c)2010 Michael Ashby, Hugh Shercliff, David Cebon.

Tekla Structural Designer 2016i

Chapter 8. Shear and Diagonal Tension

APPENDIX D SUMMARY OF EXISTING SIMPLIFIED METHODS

Failure in Flexure. Introduction to Steel Design, Tensile Steel Members Modes of Failure & Effective Areas

Mechanics of Structure

STRENGTH OF MATERIALS-I. Unit-1. Simple stresses and strains

The plastic moment capacity of a composite cross-section is calculated in the program on the following basis (BS 4.4.2):

Fire resistance assessment of composite steel-concrete structures

Transcription:

CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 1 Material Properties Characteristic strength of concrete, f cu ( 60N/mm 2 ; HSC N/A) 35 N/mm 2 OK Yield strength of longitudinal steel, f y 460 N/mm 2 Yield strength of shear link steel, f yv 460 N/mm 2 Type of concrete and density, ρ c 24 kn/m 3 Slab Parameters Shorter span (defined as in x) and number, l x (number affects slab l x moments 5.000 m Longer span (defined as in y) and number, l y (number affects slab l y moments 6.000 m OK Slab support conditions (affects effective beam section, moments, shear, deflection criteria) Panel (affects moments for continuous case, shear for continuous case and whether interior or edge beam for both precast and continuous cases) Overall slab depth, h slab (l/24-l/35 s/s; l/34-l/40 cont) Cover to all reinforcement, cover (usually MAX(25, φ) internal; 40 external) Effective depth to sagging steel in x, d x,s = h slab - cover - φ sx /2 Effective depth to sagging steel in y, d y,s = h slab - cover - φ sx - φ sy /2 Effective depth to hogging steel in x, d x,h = h slab - cover - φ link,x - φ hx /2 Effective depth to hogging steel in y, d y,h = h slab - cover - φ link,y - φ hx - φ hy /2 175 mm 30 mm 140 mm 130 mm 140 mm 130 mm Sagging steel reinforcement diameter in x, φ sx Sagging steel reinforcement pitch for resistance in x, p sx 10 mm 200 mm Sagging steel area provided in x, A s,prov,x,s = (π.φ 2 sx /4)/p sx 393 mm 2 /m Sagging steel reinforcement diameter in y, φ sy 10 mm Sagging steel reinforcement pitch for resistance in y, p sy 200 mm Sagging steel area provided in y, A s,prov,y,s = (π.φ 2 sy /4)/p sy 393 mm 2 /m Hogging steel reinforcement diameter in x, φ hx 10 mm Hogging steel reinforcement pitch for resistance in x, p hx 200 mm Hogging steel area provided in x, A s,prov,x,h = (π.φ 2 hx /4)/p hx 393 mm 2 /m Hogging steel reinforcement diameter in y, φ hy 10 mm Hogging steel reinforcement pitch for resistance in y, p hy 200 mm Hogging steel area provided in y, A s,prov,y,h = (π.φ hy 2 /4)/p hy 393 mm 2 /m Shear link diameter for bending in x, φ link,x 0 mm Number of links per metre for bending in x, n link,x 4 /m Area provided by all links per metre for bending in x, A sv,prov,x = n link,x.π.φ 2 link,x /4 0 mm 2 /m Pitch of links for bending in x, S x 150 mm Shear link diameter for bending in y, φ link,y 0 mm Number of links per metre for bending in y, n link,y 4 /m Area provided by all links per metre for bending in y, A sv,prov,y = n link,y.π.φ 2 link,y /4 0 mm 2 /m Pitch of links for bending in y, S y 150 mm Slab Loading (Plan Loading) (Internal elev load not on beam must be checked on effective widths [span/(5 or 7.14)] within slab depth) Live load, LL 2.00 kpa Superimposed dead load, SDL plan 1.20 kpa Dead load of slab, DL = h slab.ρ c 4.20 kpa ULS slab loading, ω ULS,slab (a.k.a. n) = 1.4 (DL + SDL plan ) + 1.6 LL 10.76 kpa Beam Loading (Elevation Loading) Superimposed dead load on y direction beam, SDL elev,x Superimposed dead load on x direction beam, SDL elev,y 0.00 kn/m 0.00 kn/m

CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 2 Parameters of Beam Spanning in y Direction (Slab in x Direction) Interior or edge beam? Edge Beam (affects tributary width for loading on beam, available beam spacing for effective width in cont case) Downstand depth of beam (excluding slab) spanning in y direction, h d,beam,x 225 mm Width of beam spanning in y direction, b w,beam,x 150 mm Dead load on y direction beam downstand, DL beam,x = h d,beam,x b w,beam ρ c 0.81 kn/m Sag moment beam span y, M x,sag 80 knm Hog moment beam span y, M x,hog 40 knm Shear beam span y, V x 53 kn Span (for effective width and deflection calcs) Available beam spacing (effective width calcs in continuous case) Sag section type Hog section type Overall depth, h beam,x (downstand if precast, downstand + slab if cont) 6.000 m 2.500 m L - s/s Rect - s/s 400 mm For sagging: tension steel diameter, φ t,sag,x and number 20 2 For sagging: compression steel diameter, φ c,sag,x and number 0 For sagging: add cover to compression steel, cover add,x,c,sag = φ hx 10 mm For hogging: tension steel diameter, φ t,hog,x and number 20 2 For hogging: add cover to tensile steel, cover add,x,t,hog = cover add,x,c,sag 10 mm For hogging: compression steel diameter, φ c,hog,x and number 0 0 Link diameter φ link,x, number and pitch 10 2 250 mm For sagging: number of layers of tensile steel, n layers,tens,sag 1 layer(s) For sagging: number of layers of compression steel, n layers,comp,sag 1 layer(s) Ratio β b =1.2 (sagging) or 0.8 (hogging) unless single span or conti 1.0 1.0 For hogging: number of layers of tensile steel, n layers,tens,hog 1 layer(s) For hogging: number of layers of compression steel, n layers,comp,hog 1 layer(s)

E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 3 Parameters of Beam Spanning in x Direction (Slab in y Direction) Interior or edge beam? Edge Beam (affects tributary width for loading on beam, available beam spacing for effective width in cont case) Downstand depth of beam (excluding slab) spanning in x direction, h d,beam,y 225 mm Width of beam spanning in x direction, b w,beam,y 150 mm Dead load on x direction beam downstand, DL beam,y = h d,beam,y b w,beam ρ c 0.81 kn/m Sag moment beam span x, M y,sag 38 knm Hog moment beam span x, M y,hog 59 knm Shear beam span x, V y 57 kn Span (for effective width and deflection calcs) 5.000 m Available beam spacing (effective width calcs in continuous case) 3.000 m Sag section type L - continuous Hog section type Rect - continuous Overall depth, h beam,y (downstand if precast, downstand + slab if cont) 400 mm For sagging: tension steel diameter, φ t,sag,y and number 2 For sagging: add cover to tension steel, cover add,y,t,sag = cover add,y,c,hog 20 mm For sagging: compression steel diameter, φ c,sag,y and number 0 For sagging: add cover to compression steel, cover add,y,c,sag = cover add,y,t,hog 30 mm For hogging: tension steel diameter, φ t,hog,y and number 2 For hogging: add cover to tensile steel, cover add,y,t,hog = MAX{φ hx + φ hy, MAX(φ li 30 mm For hogging: compression steel diameter, φ c,hog,y and number 0 For hogging: add cover to compression steel, cover add,y,c,hog = MAX{0, MAX(φ t,s 20 mm Link diameter φ link,y, number and pitch 2 250 mm For sagging: number of layers of tensile steel, n layers,tens,sag 1 layer(s) For sagging: number of layers of compression steel, n layers,comp,sag 1 layer(s) Ratio β b =1.2 (sagging) or 0.8 (hogging) unless single span or conti 1.0 1.0 For hogging: number of layers of tensile steel, n layers,tens,hog 1 layer(s) For hogging: number of layers of compression steel, n layers,comp,hog 1 layer(s)

E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 4 Utilisation Summary (Slab) Item UT Remark Sag moment, m x 63% OK Sag moment, m y 74% OK Hog moment, m 1 37% OK Hog moment, m 2 37% OK Hog moment, m 3 83% OK Hog moment, m 4 0% OK % Min sag reinforcement in x 58% OK % Min sag reinforcement in y 58% OK % Min hog reinforcement 1 58% OK % Min hog reinforcement 2 58% OK % Min hog reinforcement 3 58% OK % Min hog reinforcement 4 58% OK Ultimate shear stress for bending in x and y 3% OK Shear design capacity for bending in x 20% OK Shear design capacity for bending in y 22% OK Shear design capacity for bending in x and y combined 42% OK Deflection requirements 78% OK Total utilisation precast slab 78% OK Total utilisation continuous slab 83% OK Detailing requirements OK Utilisation Summary (Beam) Automatic design All Beams Item UT Detailing Remark Beam spanning in y (slab in x) sagging 88% NOT OK NOT OK Beam spanning in y (slab in x) hogging 45% NOT OK NOT OK Beam spanning in x (slab in y) sagging 48% NOT OK NOT OK Beam spanning in x (slab in y) hogging 65% NOT OK NOT OK Beam y Sag Beam y Hog Beam x Sag Beam x Hog Overall Utilisation Summary Overall utilisation 88% Overall detailing requirements NOT OK % Sag reinforcement in x 0.22 % % Sag reinforcement in y 0.22 % % Hog reinforcement in x 0.22 % % Hog reinforcement in y 0.22 % Estimated steel reinforcement quantity (130 220kg/m 3 ) 70 kg/m 3 [ 7.850. (A s,prov,x,s +A s,prov,y,s +A s,prov,x,h +A s,prov,x,h ) / h slab ]; No curtailment; No laps; Links ignored; Estimated steel reinforcement quantity (130 220kg/m 3 ) 99 kg/m 3 IStructE [ 11.0. (A s,prov,x,s +A s,prov,y,s +A s,prov,x,h +A s,prov,x,h ) / h slab ]; Curtailment; Laps; Links ignored; [Note that steel quantity in kg/m 3 can be obtained from 110.0 x % rebar]; Material cost: concrete, c 180 units/m 3 steel, s 4500 units/tonne Reinforced concrete material cost = [c+(est. rebar quant).s].h slab 109 units/m 2

E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 5 Member Design - RC Two Way Spanning Slab XX 03-09-15 Plan Layout Multi-Span l x Multi-Span l y Floor Plate Longer Span, l y 6.0m Shorter Span, l x 5.0m Relevant Panels Interior Edge for Span in x Direction Edge for Span in y Direction Corner Construction Type Continuous Precast Support Conditions Continuous Simply Supported Number of spans in l x Number of spans in l y Multi-span Multi-span Single-Span l x Multi-Span l y Floor Plate Longer Span, l y 6.0m Shorter Span, l x 5.0m Relevant Panels Interior Edge for Span in x Direction Edge for Span in y Direction Corner N/A N/A Construction Type Continuous Precast Support Conditions Continuous Simply Supported Number of spans in l x Number of spans in l y Single-span Multi-span

CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 6 Multi-Span l x Single-Span l y Floor Plate Longer Span, l y 6.0m Shorter Span, l x 5.0m 4 leg Relevant Panels Interior N/A Edge for Span in x Direction N/A Torsion Edge for Span in y Direction Corner Construction Type Continuous Precast Number of spans in l x Number of spans in l y Single-Span l x Single-Span l y Floor Plate Longer Span, l y 6.0m Support Conditions Continuous Simply Supported Multi-span Single-span Torsion 4 leg Shorter Span, l x 5.0m Relevant Panels Interior Edge for Span in x Direction Edge for Span in y Direction Corner N/A N/A N/A Construction Type Continuous Precast Support Conditions Continuous Simply Supported Number of spans in l x Number of spans in l y Single-span Single-span

CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 7 Assumptions and Limitations 1 Moment effects for slabs may only be calculated based on redistributed effects (not elastic effects). 2 Moment effects for beams may be calculated based on redistributed effects or elastic effects. Detailing Instructions Links for Direction x s of T0@150mm pitch per metre Bottom Steel T10@200mm centres Min steel @ edges n steel at free corners Bottom Steel T10@200mm centres Min steel @ edges n steel at free corners Not to Scale 0.750 m 4.500 m Cover = 30 mm Concrete = 35 MPa Rebars = 460 MPa Links = 460 MPa l x = 5.000 m Top Steel T10@200mm centres Min steel @ edges Torsion steel at free corners Reinforcement for Span in x d x,s = 140 mm l y = 6.000 m d x,h = 140 mm 3.750 m Links for Direction y s of T0@150mm pitch per metre d y,s = 130 mm d y,h = 130 mm 0.625 m Reinforcement for Span in y Top Steel T10@200mm centres Min steel @ edges Torsion steel at free corners

CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 8

CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 9 Detailing Steel Positions Note that the main slab reinforcement in y is assumed to be interior to main slab reinforcement in x; Note that the main beam in y reinforcement is assumed to be interior to main slab reinforcement in x; Note that the main beam in x reinforcement is assumed to be interior to main beam in y reinforcement; Note the same cover to all reinforcement used for the slab is used for the beam;

E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 10 Structural Analysis Slab Bending Moments Slab Simply Supported Sag moment in x (precast or single span) 0.084 23 knm/m Sag moment in y (precast or single span) 0.059 16 knm/m Hog moment in x = 0 (precast), m sx /2 (single span continuous) Hog moment in y = 0 (precast), m sy /2 (single span continuous) 11 knm/m 8 knm/m Slab Continuous Continuity of side (1) Discontinuous Continuity of side (2) Discontinuous Continuity of side (3) Continuous Continuity of side (4) Discontinuous Number of discontinuous edges, N d 3 0.044 β 1 (4/3β y if continuous, 0 if discontinuous) 0.000 β 2 (4/3β y if continuous, 0 if discontinuous) 0.000 0.339 β 3 (4/3β x if continuous, 0 if discontinuous) β 4 (4/3β x if continuous, 0 if discontinuous) β x 0.053 β 3 (4/3β x if continuous, 0 if discontinuous) 0.071 β 4 (4/3β x if continuous, 0 if discontinuous) 0.000 Sag moment in x Sag moment in y 14 knm/m 12 knm/m 2 Hog moment, m 1 = β 1 nl x 2 Hog moment, m 2 = β 2 nl x 2 Hog moment, m 3 = β 3 nl x 2 Hog moment, m 4 = β 4 nl x 0 knm/m 0 knm/m 19 knm/m 0 knm/m

E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 11 Note that 4 edges discontinuous does not imply precast as the edges are still prevented from lifting, and adequate torsion provisions are made.

E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 12 Member Design - RC Two Way Spanning Slab XX 03-09-15 Structural Analysis Slab Shear Forces Slab Shear force for bending in direction of span x 17 kn/m Coefficient 0.310 Shear force for bending in direction of span y 18 kn/m Coefficient 0.330 Note that for edge and corner panels, the shear force has been calculated for the less critical discontinuous part of the panel instead of the continuous part because the SDL will be more critical here due to external cladding. Beam Slab UDL on beam spanning in y (slab in x), ω beam,x = ν sx Slab UDL on beam spanning in x (slab in y), ω beam,y = ν sy 17 kn/m 18 kn/m ULS beam spanning y, ω ULS,beam,x = F.ω beam,x +1.4SDL elev,x +1.4DL beam ULS beam spanning x, ω ULS,beam,y = F.ω beam,y +1.4SDL elev,y +1.4DL beam (Factor F: Interior beams have got two slabs spanning onto them hence F = 2 whilst edges beams have only one slab hence F = 1) 18 kn/m 19 kn/m 0.08Fl 0.125Fl 0.05Fl #PL 0.083Fl Note elastic moment effects. #PL pattern loading factor 1.2; Note allowance has been made in this table for 20% moment redistribution; Sag moment beam span y, M x,sag = coeff.(ω ULS,beam,x. l y )l y Hog moment beam span y, M x,hog = coeff.(ω ULS,beam,x. l y )l y Shear beam span y, V x = coeff.(ω ULS,beam,x. l y ) 80 knm 40 knm 53 kn Sag moment beam span x, M y,sag = coeff.(ω ULS,beam,y. l x )l x Hog moment beam span x, M y,hog = coeff.(ω ULS,beam,y. l x )l x Shear beam span x, V y = coeff.(ω ULS,beam,y. l x ) 38 knm 59 knm 57 kn Note that the coefficients above are appropriate to the panel as follows. Panel Sag y Hog y Shear y Sag x Hog x Shear x Interior 0.050 0.083 0.550 0.050 0.083 0.550 Edge in x 0.050 0.083 0.550 0.080 0.125 0.600 Edge in y 0.080 0.125 0.600 0.050 0.083 0.550 Corner 0.080 0.125 0.600 0.080 0.125 0.600 Single Span 0.125 0.063 0.500 0.125 0.063 0.500 Note that the beams are always continuous (unless single span) since monolithic with columns, but the slab can be continuous (unless single span) or precast.

E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 13 Shear Force Coefficients for Simply Supported Slab These have been taken to be the same as the continuous slab with all 4 edges having the same continuity, i.e. continuous or discontinuous, as the coefficients are the same in either case. Shear Force Coefficients for Continuous Slab

E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 14 Slab Moment Design Sag moment, m x Sag moment, m y Hog moment, m 1 Hog moment, m 2 Hog moment, m 3 Hog moment, m 4 14 knm/m 16 knm/m 8 knm/m 8 knm/m 19 knm/m 0 knm/m Ensure singly reinforced z <=0.95d K' K z A s A s,prov UT Sag moment, m x 0.156 0.021 133 246 393 63% OK Sag moment, m y 0.156 0.027 124 292 393 74% OK Hog moment, m 1 0.156 0.013 124 146 393 37% OK Hog moment, m 2 0.156 0.013 124 146 393 37% OK Hog moment, m 3 0.132 0.028 133 327 393 83% OK Hog moment, m 4 0.132 0.000 133 0 393 0% OK Note unless precast or single span whereby β b = 1.00 and K' = 0.156, K' calculated with β b = 1.20 (sagging) or 0.80 (hogging), however K' for β b 0.90 truncated at 0.156. If K > K', then UT = 999%. Note that A s and A s,prov above are in units of mm 2 /m. Note that A s,prov is really specified for the middle strip. % Min sag reinforcement in x (>= 0.0024bh G250; >= 0.0013bh G460) 0.22 % % Min sag reinforcement in x utilisation 58% OK % Min sag reinforcement in y (>= 0.0024bh G250; >= 0.0013bh G460) 0.22 % % Min sag reinforcement in y utilisation 58% OK % Min hog reinforcement 1 (>= 0.0024bh G250; >= 0.0013bh G460) 0.22 % % Min hog reinforcement 1 utilisation 58% OK % Min hog reinforcement 2 (>= 0.0024bh G250; >= 0.0013bh G460) 0.22 % % Min hog reinforcement 2 utilisation 58% OK % Min hog reinforcement 3 (>= 0.0024bh G250; >= 0.0013bh G460) 0.22 % % Min hog reinforcement 3 utilisation 58% OK % Min hog reinforcement 4 (>= 0.0024bh G250; >= 0.0013bh G460) 0.22 % % Min hog reinforcement 4 utilisation 58% OK

E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 15 Slab Shear Design for Bending in x Ultimate shear stress for bending in x, v ult,x =ν sx /bd x,h (< 0.8f cu 0.5 & 5N/mm 2 ) 0.12 N/mm 2 Ultimate shear stress for bending in x utilisation 3% OK Design shear stress for bending in x, v d,x =ν sx /bd x,h 0.12 N/mm 2 (Conservatively, shear capacity enhancement by either calculating v d at d from support and comparing against unenhanced v c as clause 3.4.5.10 BS8110 or calculating v d at support and comparing against enhanced v c within 2d of the support as clause 3.4.5.8 BS8110 ignored;) Area of tensile steel reinforcement provided, A s,prov,x,h 393 mm 2 /m ρ w = 100A s,prov,x,h /bd x,h 0.28 % v c,x = (0.79/1.25)(ρ w f cu /25) 1/3 (400/d x,h ) 1/4 ; ρ w <3; f cu <40; (400/d x,h ) 1/4 >0.67 0.60 N/mm 2 Check v d,x < v c,x for no links Concrete shear capacity v c,x.(bd x,h ) VALID 84 kn/m Check v c,x < v d,x < 0.4 + v c,x for nominal links Provide nominal links such that A sv / S > 0.4b/(0.95f yv ) i.e. A sv / S Concrete and nominal links shear capacity (0.4 + v c,x ).(bd x,h ) N/A 0.92 mm 2 /mm/m 140 kn/m Check v d,x > 0.4 + v c,x for design links Provide shear links A sv / S > b(v d,x -v c,x )/(0.95f yv ) i.e. A sv / S > Concrete and design links shear capacity (A sv,prov,x /S x ).(0.95f yv ).d x,h N/A 0.92 mm 2 /mm/m 84 kn/m Area provided by all links per metre, A sv,prov,x 0 mm 2 /m Tried A sv,prov,x / S x value 0.00 mm 2 /mm/m Design shear resistance for bending in x utilisation 20% OK Slab Shear Design for Bending in y Ultimate shear stress for bending in y, v ult,y =ν sy /bd y,h (< 0.8f cu 0.5 & 5N/mm 2 ) 0.14 N/mm 2 Ultimate shear stress for bending in y utilisation 3% OK Design shear stress for bending in y, v d,y =ν sy /bd y,h 0.14 N/mm 2 (Conservatively, shear capacity enhancement by either calculating v d at d from support and comparing against unenhanced v c as clause 3.4.5.10 BS8110 or calculating v d at support and comparing against enhanced v c within 2d of the support as clause 3.4.5.8 BS8110 ignored;) Area of tensile steel reinforcement provided, A s,prov,y,h 393 mm 2 /m ρ w = 100A s,prov,y,h /bd y,h 0.30 % v c,y = (0.79/1.25)(ρ w f cu /25) 1/3 (400/d y,h ) 1/4 ; ρ w <3; f cu <40; (400/d y,h ) 1/4 >0.67 0.63 N/mm 2 Check v d,y < v c,y for no links Concrete shear capacity v c,y.(bd y,h ) VALID 82 kn/m Check v c,y < v d,y < 0.4 + v c,y for nominal links Provide nominal links such that A sv / S > 0.4b/(0.95f yv ) i.e. A sv / S Concrete and nominal links shear capacity (0.4 + v c,y ).(bd y,h ) N/A 0.92 mm 2 /mm/m 134 kn/m Check v d,y > 0.4 + v c,y for design links Provide shear links A sv / S > b(v d,y -v c,y )/(0.95f yv ) i.e. A sv / S > Concrete and design links shear capacity (A sv,prov,y /S y ).(0.95f yv ).d y,h N/A 0.92 mm 2 /mm/m 82 kn/m Area provided by all links per metre, A sv,prov,y 0 mm 2 /m Tried A sv,prov,y / S y value 0.00 mm 2 /mm/m Design shear resistance for bending in y utilisation 22% OK

E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 16 Detailing Requirements All detailing requirements met? OK Max sagging steel reinforcement pitch in x (<3d x,s, <750mm) 200 mm OK Max sagging steel reinforcement pitch in y (<3d y,s, <750mm) 200 mm OK Max hogging steel reinforcement pitch in x (<3d x,h, <750mm) 200 mm OK Max hogging steel reinforcement pitch in y (<3d y,h, <750mm) 200 mm OK Max sagging steel reinforcement pitch in x 200 mm OK Max sagging steel reinforcement pitch in y 200 mm OK Max hogging steel reinforcement pitch in x 200 mm OK Max hogging steel reinforcement pitch in y 200 mm OK Min sagging steel reinforcement pitch in x (>75mm+φ sx, >100mm+φ sx if T40) 200 mm OK Min sagging steel reinforcement pitch in y (>75mm+φ sy, >100mm+φ sy if T40) 200 mm OK Min hogging steel reinforcement pitch in x (>75mm+φ hx, >100mm+φ hx if T40) 200 mm OK Min hogging steel reinforcement pitch in y (>75mm+φ hy, >100mm+φ hy if T40) 200 mm OK Note an allowance has been made for laps in the min pitch by increasing the criteria by the bar diameter. % Max sag reinforcement in x (<= 0.04bh) 0.22 % OK % Max sag reinforcement in y (<= 0.04bh) 0.22 % OK % Max hog reinforcement x (<= 0.04bh) 0.22 % OK % Max hog reinforcement y (<= 0.04bh) 0.22 % OK Sagging steel reinforcement diameter in x, φ sx (>=10mm) 10 mm OK Sagging steel reinforcement diameter in y, φ sy (>=10mm) 10 mm OK Hogging steel reinforcement diameter in x, φ hx (>=10mm) 10 mm OK Hogging steel reinforcement diameter in y, φ hy (>=10mm) 10 mm OK

E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 17 Member Design - RC Two Way Spanning Slab XX 03-09-15 Deflection Criteria Span in x Span, x 5.000 m Span, x / effective depth, d x,s ratio 35.7 Basic span / effective depth ratio criteria (20 precast or single span; 23 edge; 23.0 Multiplier C 1,span more or less than 10m 1.00 Modification factor for tension C 2 m x /bd x,s 2 0.73 N/mm 2 (β b =1.2 unless precast or single span) 160 N/mm 2 Modification 2.00 Modified span / effective depth ratio criteria 46.0 Deflection utilisation 78% OK Span in y Note that the deflection check is performed only for the shorter direction.

E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 18 Scheme Design

E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 19 Beam Section Input Description A. Beam Depth Width Sag Section Continuous slab + downstand b w T - continuous Precast downstand b w Rect - continuous B. Beam at Edge of Slab Span Depth Width Sag Section Continuous slab + downstand b w L - continuous Precast downstand b w Rect - continuous

E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 20 Typical Initial Span / Effective Depth Ratios

E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 21 Two Way Spanning Ribbed Slab (Waffle Slab) 1. The two way spanning ribbed slab is beneficial for its lighter weight compared to the equivalent two way spanning solid slab; 2. The dimensions of the two way spanning ribbed slab is as per the one way spanning ribbed slab; 3. The design of the two way spanning ribbed slab is as per the one way spanning ribbed slab with design moment and shear coefficients as per the two way spanning solid slab; 4. The minimum steel reinforcement is as per the one way spanning ribbed slab;