Homework 4. Goldstein 9.7. Part (a) Theoretical Dynamics October 01, 2010 (1) P i = F 1. Q i. p i = F 1 (3) q i (5) P i (6)

Similar documents
Homework 3. 1 Goldstein Part (a) Theoretical Dynamics September 24, The Hamiltonian is given by

Physics 5153 Classical Mechanics. Canonical Transformations-1

Canonical transformations (Lecture 4)

Curves in the configuration space Q or in the velocity phase space Ω satisfying the Euler-Lagrange (EL) equations,

HAMILTON S PRINCIPLE

Solutions to Problems in Goldstein, Classical Mechanics, Second Edition. Chapter 9

NIU PHYS 500, Fall 2006 Classical Mechanics Solutions for HW6. Solutions

Lecture 5. Alexey Boyarsky. October 21, Legendre transformation and the Hamilton equations of motion

PHY411 Lecture notes Part 2

The Geometry of Euler s equation. Introduction

Hamiltonian flow in phase space and Liouville s theorem (Lecture 5)

for changing independent variables. Most simply for a function f(x) the Legendre transformation f(x) B(s) takes the form B(s) = xs f(x) with s = df

Assignment 8. [η j, η k ] = J jk

Part II. Classical Dynamics. Year

Hamilton s principle and Symmetries

Chapter 1. Principles of Motion in Invariantive Mechanics

HANDOUT #12: THE HAMILTONIAN APPROACH TO MECHANICS

Nonlinear Single-Particle Dynamics in High Energy Accelerators

Lecture 11 : Overview

M2A2 Problem Sheet 3 - Hamiltonian Mechanics

Physics 106a, Caltech 13 November, Lecture 13: Action, Hamilton-Jacobi Theory. Action-Angle Variables

Hamiltonian flows, cotangent lifts, and momentum maps

Course 241: Advanced Mechanics. Scholarship Questions

Statistical Mechanics Solution Set #1 Instructor: Rigoberto Hernandez MoSE 2100L, , (Dated: September 4, 2014)

15. Hamiltonian Mechanics

1 Graded problems. PHY 5246: Theoretical Dynamics, Fall November 23 rd, 2015 Assignment # 12, Solutions. Problem 1

Legendre s Equation. PHYS Southern Illinois University. October 13, 2016

An Exactly Solvable 3 Body Problem

EULER-LAGRANGE TO HAMILTON. The goal of these notes is to give one way of getting from the Euler-Lagrange equations to Hamilton s equations.

Variational principles and Hamiltonian Mechanics

June 21, Peking University. Dual Connections. Zhengchao Wan. Overview. Duality of connections. Divergence: general contrast functions

Legendre Transforms, Calculus of Varations, and Mechanics Principles

Dirac Structures and the Legendre Transformation for Implicit Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Systems

Hamiltonian Field Theory

Balanced models in Geophysical Fluid Dynamics: Hamiltonian formulation, constraints and formal stability

Physics 235 Chapter 7. Chapter 7 Hamilton's Principle - Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Dynamics

PHYS 705: Classical Mechanics. Hamiltonian Formulation & Canonical Transformation

Hamilton-Jacobi theory

Hamiltonian Solution I

Housekeeping. No announcement HW #7: 3.19

Chapter 11. Hamiltonian formulation Legendre transformations

p 1 ( Y p dp) 1/p ( X p dp) 1 1 p

Chaos in Hamiltonian systems

Dynamics and Stability application to submerged bodies, vortex streets and vortex-body systems

PHY 5246: Theoretical Dynamics, Fall November 16 th, 2015 Assignment # 11, Solutions. p θ = L θ = mr2 θ, p φ = L θ = mr2 sin 2 θ φ.

Page 712. Lecture 42: Rotations and Orbital Angular Momentum in Two Dimensions Date Revised: 2009/02/04 Date Given: 2009/02/04

Liouville integrability of Hamiltonian systems and spacetime symmetry

Canonical transformations and exact invariants for time-dependent Hamiltonian systems

Review of Lagrangian Mechanics and Reduction

Second quantization: where quantization and particles come from?

MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS

(Most of the material presented in this chapter is taken from Thornton and Marion, Chap. 7) p j . (5.1) !q j. " d dt = 0 (5.2) !p j . (5.

Introduction to Hamiltonian Monte Carlo Method

Chapter 1 Symplectic Integrator and Beam Dynamics Simulations

= 0. = q i., q i = E

Problem 1: Lagrangians and Conserved Quantities. Consider the following action for a particle of mass m moving in one dimension

Lecture notes on Classical Mechanics and Electromagnetism in Accelerator Physics

763620SS STATISTICAL PHYSICS Solutions 5 Autumn 2012

Differential Kinematics

2

INTRODUCTION TO QUANTUM FIELD THEORY

On explicit integration of two non-holonomic problems

More On Carbon Monoxide

Quantum Mechanics for Mathematicians: Energy, Momentum, and the Quantum Free Particle

The Principle of Least Action

REVIEW. Hamilton s principle. based on FW-18. Variational statement of mechanics: (for conservative forces) action Equivalent to Newton s laws!

Generators for Continuous Coordinate Transformations

M3/4A16. GEOMETRICAL MECHANICS, Part 1

Entropy Gradient Maximization for Systems with Discoupled Time

Averaging II: Adiabatic Invariance for Integrable Systems (argued via the Averaging Principle)

Chaotic motion. Phys 420/580 Lecture 10

[#1] R 3 bracket for the spherical pendulum

Quantum Mechanics in Three Dimensions

The kinetic equation (Lecture 11)

Introduction to Integrability

On Symmetry and Conserved Quantities in Classical Mechanics

BFT embedding of noncommutative D-brane system. Abstract

Path Integral Quantization of the Electromagnetic Field Coupled to A Spinor

From Particles to Fields

GEOMETRIC QUANTIZATION

2.3 Calculus of variations

Lecture 5: Orbital angular momentum, spin and rotation

Physics 70007, Fall 2009 Answers to Final Exam

Synchro-Betatron Motion in Circular Accelerators

L(q, q) = m 2 q2 V (q) 2 m + V (q)

arxiv:gr-qc/ v1 31 Jan 2006

A Characterization of Conserved Quantities in Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics

CE 530 Molecular Simulation

arxiv: v1 [math.ds] 18 Nov 2008

Group Actions and Cohomology in the Calculus of Variations

Lecture I: Constrained Hamiltonian systems

Gauge Fixing and Constrained Dynamics in Numerical Relativity

Liouville Equation. q s = H p s

From quantum to classical statistical mechanics. Polyatomic ideal gas.

Math512 PDE Homework 2

PHY411 Lecture notes Part 1

FYS 3120: Classical Mechanics and Electrodynamics

Canonical Transformations and the Hamilton-Jacobi Theory in Quantum Mechanics

The Microcanonical Approach. (a) The volume of accessible phase space for a given total energy is proportional to. dq 1 dq 2 dq N dp 1 dp 2 dp N,

Part of the advantage : Constraint forces do no virtual. work under a set of virtual displacements compatible

Transcription:

Theoretical Dynamics October 01, 2010 Instructor: Dr. Thomas Cohen Homework 4 Submitted by: Vivek Saxena Goldstein 9.7 Part (a) F 1 (q, Q, t) F 2 (q, P, t) P i F 1 Q i (1) F 2 (q, P, t) F 1 (q, Q, t) + P i Q i (2) F 1 (q, Q, t) F 3 (p, Q, t) p i F 1 q i (3) F 3 (p, Q, t) F 1 (q, Q, t) p i q i (4) F 1 (q, Q, t) F 4 (p, P, t) p i F 1 q i (5) P i F 1 Q i (6) F 4 (p, P, t) F 1 (q, Q, t) p i q i + P i Q i (7) F 2 (q, P, t) F 3 (p, Q, t) p i F 2 q i (8) Q i F 2 P i (9) F 3 (p, Q, t) F 2 (q, P, t) p i q i P i Q i (10) F 2 (q, P, t) F 4 (p, P, t) p i F 2 q i (11) F 4 (p, P, t) F 2 (q, P, t) p i q i (12) 4-1

F 3 (p, Q, t) F 4 (p, P, t) P i F 3 Q i (13) F 4 (p, P, t) F 3 (p, Q, t) + P i Q i (14) Part (b) For an identity transformation, F 2 function is q i P i and by equation (7), the type 4 generating F 4 (p, P, t) F 2 (q, P, t) p i q i (15) q i P i p i q i 0 as p i F 2 q i For an exchange transformation, F 1 q i Q i and by equation (4), the type 3 generating function is Part (c) P i F 3 (p, Q, t) F 1 (q, Q, t) p i q i (16) q i Q i p i q i 0 as p i F 1 q i Q i (17) Consider a type 2 generating function F 2 (q, P, t) of the old coordinates and the new momenta, of the form F 2 (q, P, t) f i (q 1,..., q n ; t)p i g(q 1,..., q n ; t) (18) where f i s are a set of independent functions, and g i s are differentiable functions of the old coordinates and time. The new coordinates Q i are given by In particular, the function Q i F 2 P i f i (q 1,..., q n ; t) (19) f i (q 1,..., q n ; t) R ij q j (20) where R ij is the (i, j)-th element of a N N orthogonal matrix, generates an orthogonal transformation of the coordinates. Now, p j F 2 q j This equation can be written in matrix form, as f i q j P i g q j R ij P i g q j (21) p f q P g q (22) 4-2

where p denotes the N 1 column vector (p 1,..., p N ) T, g/ q denotes the N 1 column vector ( g/ q 1,..., g/ q n ) T, and f q denotes the N N matrix with entries ( ) f f i R ij (23) q q j From (22), the new momenta are given by ij ( ) f 1 ( P p + g ) q q ( R 1 p + g ) q (24) (25) R 1 (p + q g) (26) As R is an orthogonal matrix, RR T R T R I, so R 1 R T is also an orthogonal transformation. This gives the required result: the new momenta are given by the orthogonal transformation (R 1 ) of an n-dimensional vector (p + q g), whose components are the old momenta (p) plus a gradient in configuration space ( q g). Goldstein 9.25 Part (a) The given Hamiltonian is The equation of motion for q is H 1 2 ( ) 1 q 2 + p2 q 4 (27) q H p pq4 (28) Part (b) Suppose we let Q 2 1/q 2 and P 2 p 2 q 4. Then, Q ±1/q and P ±pq 2. Now, {Q, P } {±1/q, ±pq 2 } {q 1, pq 2 } {q 1, p}q 2 + p{q 1, q 2 } ( ) q 1 p q p q 1 p q 2 + p 0 p q ( 1q ) 2 q 2 1 4-3

the signs on both Q and P cannot be identical. We take Q 1 q (29) P pq 2 (30) which is a valid canonical transformation. This gives the Hamiltonian, The equations of motion are H(Q, P ) 1 2 (P 2 + Q 2 ) (31) Q H P P (32) P H Q (33) Q Q + Q 0, the solution to which is of the form Q A cos t + B sin t. P Q B cos t A sin t. Now, This gives q 1 Q (A cos t + B sin t) 1 (34) p P Q 2 (B cos t A sin t)(a cos t + B sin t) 2 (35) so, and hence q (A cos t + B sin t) 2 ( A sin t + B cos t) (36) pq 4 (B cos t A sin t)(a cos t+b sin t) 2 (A cos t+b sin t) 4 (B cos t A sin t)(a cos t+b sin t) 2 q (37) the solution to the transformed equation for Q satisfies the original equation of motion for q. Problem 1 Part (a) {X, P x } {x + ɛ, p x } {x, p x } 1 (38) {Y, P y } {y, p x } 1 (39) 4-4

{Z, P z } {z, p z } 1 (40) {X, P y } {X, P z } {Y, P x } {Y, P z } {Z, P x } {Z, P y } 0 (41) {X, X} {Y, Y } {Z, Z} {P x, P x } {P y, P z } {P z, P z } {P x, P y } {P y, P z } {P z, P x } 0 (42) this is a canonical transformation. It corresponds to a translated canonical coordinate system (translation along the x-direction in phase space). So P x is the generator of the canonical transformation. Part (b) dx dɛ [X, P x] 1 (43) {X, P x } {x cos ɛ + y sin ɛ, p x cos ɛ + p y sin ɛ} cos 2 ɛ{x, p x } + sin 2 {y, p y } 1 (44) {Y, P y } { x sin ɛ + y cos ɛ, p x sin ɛ + p y cos ɛ} sin 2 ɛ{x, p x } + cos 2 ɛ{y, p y } 1 (45) {Z, P z } {z, p z } Using properties of the Poisson Bracket, we also have 1 (46) {X, P y } {X, P z } {Y, P x } {Y, P z } {Z, P x } {Z, P y } 0 (47) {X, X} {Y, Y } {Z, Z} {P x, P x } {P y, P z } {P z, P z } {P x, P y } {P y, P z } {P z, P x } 0 (48) this is a canonical transformation. It corresponds to a rotation about the z-axis in phase space. dx x sin ɛ + y cos ɛ (49) dɛ whereas {X, L z } {x cos ɛ + y sin ɛ, xp y yp x } x sin ɛ y cos ɛ (50) dx dɛ {X, L z} (51) Therefore, L z is the generator of the canonical transformation. 4-5

Part (c) {X, P x } {x, p x + ɛ} 1 (52) {Y, P y } {y, p y } 1 (53) {Z, P z } {z, p z } Using properties of the Poisson Bracket, we also have 1 (54) {X, P y } {X, P z } {Y, P x } {Y, P z } {Z, P x } {Z, P y } 0 (55) {X, X} {Y, Y } {Z, Z} {P x, P x } {P y, P z } {P z, P z } {P x, P y } {P y, P z } {P z, P x } 0 (56) this is a canonical transformation. It corresponds to a translation along the p x direction in phase space. Now, ( Px X {P x, X} P ) x X 1 dp x (57) q i p i p i q i dɛ Therefore, X is the generator of the canonical transformation. Part (d) {X, P x } {(1 + ɛ)x, (1 + ɛ) 1 p x } 1 (58) {Y, P y } {(1 + ɛ)y, (1 + ɛ) 1 p y } 1 (59) {Z, P z } {(1 + ɛ)z, (1 + ɛ) 1 p z } Using properties of the Poisson Bracket, we also have 1 (60) {X, P y } {X, P z } {Y, P x } {Y, P z } {Z, P x } {Z, P y } 0 (61) {X, X} {Y, Y } {Z, Z} {P x, P x } {P y, P z } {P z, P z } {P x, P y } {P y, P z } {P z, P x } 0 (62) 4-6

this is a canonical transformation. It is a scaling transformation, which preserves the volume element in phase space. Suppose g is the generator of the scaling transformation. Then, X x [X, g] [(1 + ɛ)x, g] (63) ɛ which implies that is, the solution to which is x 1 + ɛ x g [x, g] x g x p x p x x (64) x 1 + ɛ g (65) p x g xp x 1 + ɛ + f(y, z, p y, p z ) (66) As dy/dɛ y [(1 + ɛ)y, g] and dz/dɛ z [(1 + ɛ)z, g], following a similar argument for Y and Z (or by symmetry) we get as the generator of the scaling transformation. Problem 2 As η is a canonical transformation, we have g xp x 1 + ɛ + yp y 1 + ɛ + zp z + constant (67) 1 + ɛ H ɛ H ɛ H {η i, g} H ξ j J jk g ξ k H η j J jk g η k H δ ij J jk g η k H J ij g η j {H, g} ġ ɛ {η i, g} (68) (as ξ is a canonical transformation) (as Poisson Brackets are invariant under canonical transformations) (69) But since H is conserved, H ɛ 0 and hence ġ 0. Therefore, g is conserved. 4-7

Problem 3 The quantity, which was found to be an invariant of the system, can be expressed in terms of the canonical coordinates x, y, p x, p y as (x, y, p x, p y ) 1 (p2 x p 2 y) + 1 2 mω2 (x 2 αy 2 ) (70) As is the conserved generator of a family of canonical transformations parametrized by an infinitesimal parameter ɛ, we must have We consider each condition separately below. δx ɛ{x, } (71) δy ɛ{y, } (72) δp x ɛ{p x, } (73) δp y ɛ{p x, } (74) δx ɛ{x, } 1 ɛ{x, (p2 x p 2 y) + 1 2 mω2 (x 2 αy 2 )} ɛ{x, p2 x } ɛp x m (75) (76) δy ɛ{y, } 1 ɛ{y, (p2 x p 2 y) + 1 2 mω2 (x 2 αy 2 )} ɛ{y, p2 y } ɛp y m (77) δp x ɛ{p x, } 1 ɛ{p x, (p2 x p 2 y) + 1 2 mω2 (x 2 αy 2 )} ɛ{p x, 1 2 mω2 x 2 } ɛmω 2 x (78) δp y ɛ{p y, } 1 ɛ{p y, (p2 x p 2 y) + 1 2 mω2 (x 2 αy 2 )} ɛ{p y, 1 2 mω2 αy 2 } ɛmω 2 αy (79) 4-8

Now, let ɛ δθ where θ is a parameter. Then, the above equations become dx p x dθ m (80) dy p y dθ m (81) dp x dθ mω 2 x (82) dp y dθ mω 2 αy (83) The solutions to which are and correspondingly d 2 x dθ 2 + ω2 x 0 (84) d 2 y dθ 2 + ω2 αy 0 (85) x A cos(ωθ) + B sin(ωθ) (86) y C cos(ω αθ) + D sin(ω αθ) (87) p x mωa sin(ωθ) + mωb cos(ωθ) (88) p y mω αc sin(ω αθ) mω αd cos(ω αθ) (89) Using the subscript 0 to denote the initial coordinates and momenta, we have x 0 A (90) y 0 C (91) p x0 mωb (92) p y0 mω αd (93) x x 0 cos(ωθ) + p x0 mω sin(ωθ) y y 0 cos(ω θ) p y 0 mω α sin(ω αθ) p x mωx 0 sin(ωθ) + p x0 cos(ωθ) p y mω αy 0 sin(ω αθ) + p y0 cos(ω αθ) Reverting to the notation in which x 0, p x0, y 0, p y0 denote the original coordinates and X, Y, P x, P y denote the canonically transformed coordinates, we get the form of the canonical transformation as X x cos(ωθ) + p x sin(ωθ) mω (94) P x p x cos(ωθ) mωx sin(ωθ) (95) Y y cos(ω αθ) p y mω α sin(ω αθ) (96) P y p y cos(ω αθ) + mω αy sin(ω αθ) (97) 4-9

where θ is an arbitrary parameter, such that θ 0 corresponds to the untransformed coordinates. This canonical transformation is composed of two rotations in the 4-dimensional phase space (one involving X and P x and the other involving Y and P y ), and its generator is the conserved quantity. Problem 4 Part (a) Now, F 2 (q, P, t) (q + 12 gt2 ) (P mgt) P 2 t (98) p F 2 q the canonical transformation is Part (b) P mgt (99) Q F 2 P q + 1 2 gt2 P t m q + 1 2 gt2 pt m gt2 (100) P p + mgt (101) Q q pt m 1 2 gt2 (102) {Q, Q} {q pt m 1 2 gt2, q pt m 1 2 gt2 } 0 (103) {P, P } {p + mgt, p + mgt} 0 (104) {Q, P } {q pt m 1 2 gt2, p + mgt} Q P q p Q P p q ( (1)(1) t ) (0) m 1 (105) the transformation satisfies the canonical Poisson Bracket relations. Part (c) The Lagrangian is L(q, q) 1 2 m q2 mgq (106) 4-10

The canonical momentum is p L q m q (107) So the Hamiltonian is Now, Q q pt m 1 2 gt2, so {Q, H} H p q L p2 + mgq (108) { q pt {q, p2 m 1 2 gt2, p2 } } + mgq } { pt m, mgq 1 {q, p2 } gt{p, q} p + gt (109) m Also Also, P p + mgt, so Q p gt (110) m dq dt Q + {Q, H} 0 (111) {P, H} {p + mgt, p2 + mgq} mg{p, q} mg (112) and P dp dt P mg (113) + {P, H} 0 (114) 4-11

Part (d) F 2 the Hamiltonian associated with Q, P is gt(p mgt) + (q + 12 ) gt2 ( mg) P 2 P gt 3 2 mg2 t 2 mgq P 2 (p + mgt)gt 3 2 mg2 t 2 (p + mgt)2 mgq p2 mgq mg2 t 2 (115) K H + F 2 p2 p2 + mgq mgq mg2 t 2 mg 2 t 2 (116) the Hamiltonian K is zero up to time-dependent constant term mg 2 t 2, but it is not a function of P and Q (which are constant with time, since {Q, H} {P, H} 0 as shown above). Part (e) Q and P are conserved quantities, that equal the initial position and the initial momentum respectively. They are constant with time, as q and p vary: Part (f) q(t 0) Q p(t 0) P F 2 q F 2 P mgt p (117) P gt mg2 t 2 mgq P 2 2 (118) H p2 + mgq 1 ( ) 2 F2 + mgq (119) q K H + F 2 mg 2 t 2 (as shown in part d) 4-12

implies H ( q, F ) 2 + F 2 q mg 2 t 2 (120) the Hamilton-Jacobi equation is satisfied, except for a time-dependent constant term appearing on the right hand side. Part (g) f(q, P, t) F 2 (q(q, P, t), P, t) (q + 12 ) gt2 (P mgt) P 2 t ( Q + pt ) m + gt2 (P mgt) P 2 t ( ) (P mgt)t Q + + gt 2 (P mgt) P 2 t m Also, p m q P mgt. ( Q + P t m L(q, q) p2 mgq ) (P mgt) P 2 t QP + P 2 t Qmgt gp t2 (121) f P 2 mgq 2P gt (122) 1 (P mgt)2 mg ( Q + P t m 1 ) 2 gt2 1 (P 2 + m 2 g 2 t 2 2P mgt) mgq P gt + 1 2 mg2 t 2 P 2 2P gt mgq + mg2 t 2 f(q, P, t) + mg 2 t 2 (123) L(q(Q, P, t), q(q, P, t)) f(q,p,t) up to a time-dependent term mg 2 t 2. Problem 5 The Hamilton-Jacobi equation, as expressed in the form H(q, S(q, P )) + S(q, P ) 0 (124) 4-13

was obtained by constructing a generating function of the form F F 2 (q, P, t) Q i P i where F 2 denotes a generic type-2 generating function. For such a choice of F, the Hamiltonian K H + F is zero. Now, consider a type-3 generating function F 3 of the old momenta and the new coordinates, such that the Hamiltonian K is zero. Therefore, Now, so, Q i K P i 0 (125) P i K 0 (126) Q i q i F 3 p i ( p F 3 ) i (127) H(q(Q, p), p, t) + F 3 (Q, p, t) 0 (128) where the old coordinates q have been expressed in terms of the old momenta and the new coordinates using equation (127). This is a PDE in (n + 1) variables p 1,..., p n, t. Let S denote the solution of this PDE. Then, a solution of the form, F 3 S S(p 1,..., p n ; α 1,..., α n+1 ; t) (129) where Q i α i are the constants of motion (for i 1,..., n), is consistent with equation (125). Here the constant α n+1 must be a constant of integration, so the physically meaningful solution is of the form in terms of S, equation (128) can be written as which is of the desired form. S S(p 1,..., p n ; α 1,... α n ; t) (130) H( p S, S p, t) + (Q, p, t) 0 (131) 4-14