Coring and Test pit at Holtsmúli (62)

Similar documents
Report of the Skagafjörður Archaeological Settlement Survey 2007: Coring at Marbaeli By John Steinberg, Tess Ostrowsky, and Mike Slawson

Report of the Skagafjör ur Archaeological Settlement Survey 2008: Coring at The Lower Midden at Stóra Seyla By John Steinberg

By Douglas J. Bolender

Assessment of biological remains from excavations at Newbridge Quarry, Pickering, North Yorkshire (site code: NBQ99)

ARCHAEOLOGICAL METHOD FEHMARN STYLE

Barbuda Historical Ecology Project Assessment for Qualitative Field Analysis of Phosphates on Barbuda

Case study 22: Soil and Sediment Analysis from Viking to Medieval deposits in Orkney

Figure 45. Plan of Pukaroro drawn from aerial photograph. K. Jones, drawn by C. Edkins, DOC.

Sites Field Descriptions

This Unit is suitable for candidates with no previous archaeological experience but who have an interest in history and/or archaeology.

Report of the Skagafjör ur Archaeological Settlement Survey

Work Conducted in August 2018

Swaledale and Arkengarthdale Archaeology Group

AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY FOR THE EASTHAM STATE PRISON FARM UNIT PROJECT IN HOUSTON COUNTY TEXAS

Name. Designed and Produced for the Orleans County Historical Society by Andrew R. Beaupré, RPA

ARTIFACT INVENTORIES AND RESEARCH QUESTIONS

Participants: Arjen Heijnis, Maria Mertiri (Aarhus University), Silke Eisenschmidt (Museum Sønderjylland).

Evaluation/Monitoring Report No. 152

SETTLEMENT. Student exercises. The Kuril Biocomplexity Project:

Archaeology of East Oxford Project: Minchery Paddock 2012 Trench 1 Excavation Narrative report

Assessment of medieval plant and invertebrate remains from excavations at West Street, Gargrave, N. Yorkshire (site code WS97)

December 13, Kirk Shields Green Mountain Power 163 Acorn Lane Colchester, VT 05446

Tenmile Lakes Delta Building Study

Starting at Rock Bottom: A Peculiar Central Texas PreClovis Culture

Objectives: Define Relative Age, Absolute Age

Hegranes Settlement Survey: Rein, Keta, Hamar, Utanverðunes, Ásgrímsstaðir. Interim Report 2016

THE TWO MOST SIGNIFICANT ARCHEOLOGICAL SITES IN KERR COUNTY, TEXAS ARE THE GATLIN SITE AND THE BEARING SINK HOLE SITE.

General Editor: Vince Russett

Foundations on Deep Alluvial Soils

Acrefield Cottage, Winkfield Street, Maidens Green, Winkfield, Windsor, Berkshire

Geoarchaeology and Geophysics at Feltus

Lapita and Later Archaeology of the Malolo and Mamanuca Islands, Fiji

Stratigraphy Layers of Time in the Earth by Carol Schlenk

Additional Testing for Padre Dam Eastern Service Area Secondary Connection- Alternative Site Location, San Diego County, California

SCIENTIFIC DATING IN ARCHAEOLOGY

Boreholes. Implementation. Boring. Boreholes may be excavated by one of these methods: 1. Auger Boring 2. Wash Boring 3.

Archaeological Evaluation at Monkcastle Project KHAP102

CHAPTER 4. Blue Heron Site (47Je1001) 2003 Investigations. By Chrisie L. Hunter

Report on Geophysical Survey Na Vrsku, Sahy, Slovakia Coordinates: 48⁰,4,45 N 18⁰,56,23 E. April 2018

Rocks and Weathering

NEWPORT TOWER PROJECT EXTENSION

Bramley Grange, Horsham Road, Bramley, Surrey

Archaeology at Meadowcroft Rockshelter GigaPan Lessons

Collfryn Ring-ditch, Guilsfield, Powys

The Mosfell Archaeological Project Report of Hulduhóll Cremation Grave Excavation 2012

General Editor: Vince Russett

interpret archaeological strata using the law of superposition; apply cross-dating to determine the age of other artifacts.

STUDENT NAME DATE ID GRADE 5 SCIENCE

Table 9. FAI accession log

APPENDIX B: REPORT ON GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY, JULY 1998

Dry Muliwai Sample Location Map

IAEA SAFETY STANDARDS Geotechnical Aspects of Site Evaluation and Foundations in NPPs, NS-G-3.6

Understanding the Predynastic. the beginnings of ancient Egyptian civilization

From Punchbowl to Panum: Long Valley Volcanism and the Mono-Inyo Crater Chain

Monitoring Report No. 022 GREENCASTLE BURIALS GREEN CASTLE COUNTY DOWN LICENCE NO. N/A PHILIP MACDONALD

Deep Coring, Viking Age Accumulation Rates and Household Wealth in Skagafjörður, Northern Iceland

GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY REPORT. Timolin, County Kildare. Date: 18/01/2016. Licence: 15R0133

Excavations at Clocken Syke Farm, Dairy Lane,Dacre By Nidderdale Iron-age Archaeology community group 2015 and 2016

Geophysical Survey of Wisconsin Burial Site BRO-0033 Wixom Cemetery, Rock County, Wisconsin

Coarse Sediment Traps

Materials. Use materials meeting the following.

Appendix I-1: Archaeological Records Search

Ground Penetrating Radar Survey of a Portion of East End Cemetery, Cadiz, Kentucky

Fuel resource utilisation in landscapes of settlement

FIG 1 Map of Iceland, showing the locations of all pit houses excavated to date

Evaluation/Monitoring Report No. 259

Surveying Prof. Bharat Lohani Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur. Module - 11 Lecture No. # 01 Project surveys

Absolute Dating Introduction Type of Absolute Dating:

SITE INVESTIGATION 1

A Geophysical Survey at Storey s Meadow West Meon, Hampshire

Glossary of Common Terms. Guide 2. BAJR Practical Guide Series held by authors

Following the Civil War, many Americans and Europeans continued to move into the WEST

Exploring Habitats. Study Habitat Drawings to Identify Living Things & Nonliving Conditions. Safety Precautions

STONE MOUNTAIN. Owner: Kimberly Gale Powell. Technical Report for Tenures: , , , , ,

LONG PRESTON DEEPS, RIBBLESDALE, NORTH YORKSHIRE

3.4 Typical Soil Profiles

Lecture 29: Soil Formation

Archaeological Monitoring of Land at Seacrest, Cliff Drive, Warden, Isle of Sheppey, Kent

Preliminary Report of Archaeological Fieldwork at Svalbard (Svalbardshreppur), 2008

Pickan s Dyke, Dalmellington: Archaeological Investigation

Supplement of Eastern Andean environmental and climate synthesis for the last 2000 years BP from terrestrial pollen and charcoal records of Patagonia

Palaeoecology Research Services

A) usually less B) dark colored and rough D) light colored with a smooth surface A) transparency of the atmosphere D) rough, black surface

Coal Loss and Dilution Considerations for Western Canadian Foothills Open Pit Coal Projects

Archaeological Monitoring. at Johnstown, Enfield, Co. Meath.

THE INDIAN COMMUNITY SCHOOL, KUWAIT

Hegranesþing on Hegranes: Geophysical Prospection Interim Report

FEATURE DESCRIPTIONS: PART 2. MISSION GARDENS LOCUS, THE CLEARWATER SITE, AZ BB:13:6 (ASM)

Map Introduction: South Uist Map 6

Former Cart Shed, Stroud Farm, Holyport, Maidenhead, Berkshire

The Upper Paleolithic Longwangcan Site at Yichuan in Shaanxi

Roman Farm, Nettleden, Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire

Pacific NW Rocks and Minerals GEO143 Activity 5: Radioactive Decay and CRB Ages

Cell parts. nucleus cytoplasm cell surface membrane. cell wall vacuole chloroplast

Oweydoo Cave, Rathlin Island Rathlin Island Research Project AE/04/93

SWAN LAKE FIRST NATION MATRIX SOLUTIONS INC. PARTNERSHIP INDIGENOUS CONSTRUCTION MONITORING

Kara-Bom: new investigations of a Palaeolithic site in the Gorny Altai, Russia

USE OF GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS FOR FILL CHARACTERIZATION AND QUANTITY ESTIMATION AT BROWNFIELD SITES A CASE HISTORY. Abstract

Spilsbu Engag e Literacy Fo ssil Hunters

Late Bronze Age to Middle Iron Age Research topics and priorities

Transcription:

Report of the Skagafjörður Archaeological Settlement Survey 2009: Coring and Test pit at Holtsmúli (62) By John M. Steinberg, Rita S. Shepard, Kelly R. Hale, Joanna E. Curtis, & Kathryn A. Catlin With the help of Amanda Schreiner, Ayshe Yeager, Brian Damiata, Christa Beranek, Dennis Piechota, Douglas Bolender, Emily Button, Gregory Bailey, Heather Trigg, John Schoenfelder, Katharine Corwin, Katharine Johnson, Katherine Goldberg, Laura Ng, Marisa Patalano, Michael Way, Peter Gangemi, Robert de Picciotto, Robert Yeager, Rosie Taylor, Sam Mrozowski, Stephen Mrozowski, Susan Jacobucci, & Véronique Forbes Funded by United States National Science Foundation ARC 0909393 (Arctic Social Sciences) With the institutional assistance of Byggðasafn Skagfirðinga Glaumbæ Árskóli Sauðárkróki Permit issued by Kristín Huld Sigurðardóttir, Forstöðumaður Fornleifaverndar ríkisins Under the guidance of Þór Hjaltalín, Fornleifavernd ríkisins In collaboration with Sigríður Sigurðardóttir, Byggðasafn Skagfirðinga Glaumbæ Additional copies of this report and other reports, as well as much of the raw data can be downloaded from http://www.fiskecenter.umb.edu/sass.htm

Acknowledgements This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grants ARC 0909393 (Arctic Social Sciences) & BCS 0731371 (Archaeology). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. The permit was issued by Archaeological Heritage Agency of Iceland on June 19, 2009. Landowner permission was obtained with the assistance of Hjalti Pálsson of Hof. We thank the new landowner Sigurður Skarphéðinsson for his kindness in letting us investigate his land. Christine Campbell helped put together this report. 2

Goals The goal of the work at Holtsmúli (62) was straightforward. We used cores to identify the earliest occupation of the visible farmmound by placing and excavating a 1x1 m test pit in the oldest part of the midden. Coring Coring at Holtsmúli took plance on 8/11/2009. Joanna Curtis, Kelly Hale, and John Steinberg took the cores. We used a JMC backsaver core with two extensions if necessary. For deep midden exploration we sometimes used the N-3 handle, but mostly the standard backsaver handle. We employed the 18 in long 1.5 in wide JMC large diameter sampling tubes. The sample tube was cleaned between each sample and grass placed in the core hole between samples of the same core hole so as to distinguish loose soil fall from in situ deposits. Core locations were recorded with a sub-meter GPS in Real time. These coordinates were postprocessed and those post-processed coordinates are the ones associated with the cores in this report. Tephra layers were recorded along with natural and cultural deposits and any inclusions. We took 33 cores at Holtsmúli (Figure 1) to identify the area where there was substantial midden under the 1000 tephra layer or midden deposits very close to the LNL (Figure 2). Just beyond eastern edge of the cores we identified drained bog deposits. Of the 33 cores taken some identifiable tephra was found in 24 of them (72%): 9 with 1776, 9 with 1300, 13 with H1, 6 with 1000 and only 1 with the LNL/LNS. In general we first placed cores on a 10m grid. The spacing was then confined to identify the deepest part of the midden as well as the oldest part of the midden (close to the LNS). We took several cores that had those characteristics just to the north of a small shed across a fence from the garden around the farmhouse. Test pit Test pitting began 8/11/2009 and went through 8/12/2009, excavated by Joanna Curtis and Kelly Hale. The location (E 474650.40, N 572104.50, 36.35 m asl) was determined by the cores. In general, the midden was surprisingly homogeneous all the way down. There was about 5 to 7 cm of midden between the 1000 tephra and a thin (3-5 cm) layer of aeolian deposition above the NLS which seemed to be either in or right on top of a very boggy deposit which rested on the H3 tephra layer (Figure 3). The LNS is extraordinary well preserved. No finds (other than animal bones) were recovered from this test pit. Floatation Samples for flotation from all pre 1300 AD contexts were taken. Whenever possible, samples were taken during excavation. Most samples from Holtsmúli were taken from the sidewalls and precautions were taken never to contaminate samples. The flotation sample from contexts 1, 2, 3, and 4 (LNS) were analyzed. In some cases, multiple samples from the same context were taken. If this occurred they were floated and analyzed separately. 3

Context 3, well below the 1000 tephra and just above the LNS contained 1 charred Hordeum seed which was AMS dated. The sample (77365) was run by Brian Damiata at the W. M. Keck Carbon Cycle Accelerator Mass Spectrometry Laboratory at the University of California, Irvine. The date came back at 1020 ± 15 radiocarbon years before present. Calibrated this comes out to 990-1027 AD (95.4%). The LNS sample (4) had one charred seed but no cultural material. Interpretation Based on the spread of cores with midden under the 1104 tephra we estimate that in about 1104 that the mound size was about 1656 m 2 (the area under the H1 tephra). The test pit profile, the cores around the test pit, and the date on the charred Hordeum seed yielded a date somewhere between 990 and 1000. Therefore, based on the test pit, we estimate that the farm was founded in about 995 AD. 4

Figure 1. Tephra distribution. 5

Figure 2. Distribution of midden. 6

WEST WALL 1 2 3 [1] 4 1:Toposoil 2: Dry Midden with wood ash 3: Peat Ash midden 4: low density peat ash midden 5: aeolian deposit 6: Bog 1766 1300 1104 1000 LNL [2] [3] [4] 5 6 LNS H3 Figure 3. Profile of test pit 1 Meter 7

Figure 4. West wall test pit profile. 8

Figure 5. close up of west wall test pit profile. 9

Site 62 Tephra Layer Depth East North Core 2657 474844.351 573245.374 H1 109 Core 2660 474844.387 573256.899 1766 13 Core 2662 474843.772 573250.01 1766 13 1300 60 Core 2663 474844.639 573252.348 H1 80 1000 82 Core 2664 474844.225 573243.341 1300 61 H1 90 1000 100 Katla 850 118 Core 2665 474843.084 573244.635 1766 15 Core 2666 474845.312 573248.802 1300 60 H1 100 Core 2667 474845.583 573241.754 1766 15 Core 2668 474846.013 573242.704 1300 39 Core 2669 474844.429 573243.81 H1 60 Core 2670 474844.057 573243.294 1300 60 H1 70 1000 76 Core 2671 474844.146 573243.162 1300 64 H1 79 Core 2672 474844.943 573242.949 1300 65 H1 78 Katla 850 90 Core 3002 474656.682 572106.792 unknown 95

Site 62 Tephra Layer Depth East North Core 3003 474658.064 572105.571 1766 110 1300 116 Core 3004 474653.77 572106.855 1766 120 Core 3005 474659.744 572104.5 1766 105 Core 3006 474650.615 572102.687 H1 110 H3 140 H4 145 Core 3008 474672.086 572131.79 1766 110 Core 3009 474648.875 572100.75 H1 27 H1 110 LNL 115 H3 150 Core 3010 474649.072 572101.568 H1 104 1000 115 H3 140 H4 150 Core 3011 474650.501 572105.13 1300 135 H1 150 1000 155 Katla 850 160 Core 3012 474651.338 572104.224 H1 145 1000 150 Katla 850 158 Core 3013 474649.639 572105.511 1766 105 Katla 850 160

Site 62 description top depth bottom depth Thickness CORE 2656 474840.173 573268.608 Bog 0 60 60 Silt 60 61 1 Bog 61 120 59 CORE 2657 474844.351 573245.374 CORE 2658 474841.327 573240.994 Bog 0 62 62 Rock 62 62 0 CORE 2659 474853.285 573233.413 CORE 2660 474844.387 573256.899 Bog 0 40 40 CORE 2661 474847.275 573246.561 Bog 0 80 80 CORE 2662 474843.772 573250.01 CORE 2663 474844.639 573252.348 CORE 2664 474844.225 573243.341 CORE 2665 474843.084 573244.635 CORE 2666 474845.312 573248.802 CORE 2667 474845.583 573241.754 CORE 2668 474846.013 573242.704 CORE 2669 474844.429 573243.81 CORE 2670 474844.057 573243.294 Bog 0 100 100

Site 62 description top depth bottom depth Thickness CORE 2671 474844.146 573243.162 CORE 2672 474844.943 573242.949 Bog 0 105 105 CORE 3000 474665.423 572122.536 Midden 0 120 120 CORE 3001 474659.502 572110.679 Plow Zone 0 20 20 Low Density Cultural 20 110 90 Midden 110 120 10 CORE 3002 474656.682 572106.792 Plow Zone 0 30 30 Midden 30 80 50 Low Density Cultural 80 120 40 CORE 3003 474658.064 572105.571 Plow Zone 0 20 20 Midden 20 100 80 Aeolian Deposit 100 120 20 CORE 3004 474653.77 572106.855 Midden 0 120 120 CORE 3005 474659.744 572104.5 Plow Zone 0 30 30 Midden 30 120 90 CORE 3006 474650.615 572102.687 Midden 0 120 120 Bog 130 160 30 CORE 3007 474670.482 572133.243 Plow Zone 0 30 30 Midden 30 65 35 Aeolian Deposit 65 70 5 Rock 70 70 0 CORE 3008 474672.086 572131.79 Midden 0 60 60 Turf 60 80 20 Midden 80 180 100

Site 62 description top depth bottom depth Thickness CORE 3009 474648.875 572100.75 Plow Zone 0 35 35 Aeolian Deposit 35 55 20 Low Density Cultural 55 60 5 Aeolian Deposit 60 160 100 CORE 3010 474649.072 572101.568 Plow Zone 0 30 30 Midden 30 35 5 Aeolian Deposit 35 40 5 Low Density Cultural 40 80 40 Low Density Cultural 80 110 30 Midden 110 130 20 Bog 130 160 30 CORE 3011 474650.501 572105.13 Plow Zone 0 30 30 Midden 30 65 35 Low Density Cultural 65 80 15 Midden 80 160 80 CORE 3012 474651.338 572104.224 Plow Zone 0 20 20 Midden 20 40 20 Low Density Cultural 40 110 70 Midden 110 160 50 CORE 3013 474649.639 572105.511 Plow Zone 0 25 25 Midden 25 60 35 Aeolian Deposit 60 95 35 Midden 95 160 65 CORE 3014 474649.945 572104.364 Plow Zone 0 20 20 Low Density Cultural 20 35 15 Aeolian Deposit 35 50 15 Midden 50 65 15 Aeolian Deposit 65 80 15 Rock 80 80 0

Site 62 Sample 1 [1] Vol 2 SASS 2009 DATE 8/11/2009 Light Fraction grams 0.97 Heavy Fraction grams 33.22 Analysist Other present: AA Date Analized 10/27/2009 Content % Bone 25 Charcoal 5 Dung 15 Rock 50 under 1300 Sample 2 [2] Vol 2 Family Count Charred Cyperaceae 2 Yes Cyperaceae 6 Caryophyllaceae 6 Yes Chenopodiaceae 2 Violaceae Viola 1 Poaceae Wild 1 Yes Light Fraction grams 0.28 Heavy Fraction grams 10.71 Analysist AA Other present: Insect parts: 3 Date Analized 10/27/2009 Content % Bone 15 Charcoal 35 Dung 5 Rock 40 under H1/1104 Family Count Charred Caryophyllaceae 35 Yes Caryophyllaceae 12 Poaceae Wild 5 Yes Ericaceae Empetrum 1 Yes

Site 62 Sample 3 [3] Vol 2 SASS 2009 DATE 8/11/2009 Light Fraction grams 0.33 Heavy Fraction grams 4.29 Analysist AA Date Analized Other present: Bone not collected, very small pieces 10/27/2009 Content % Bone 10 Charcoal 20 Rock 65 under 1000 Sample 4 [4] Vol 2 Family Count Charred Cyperaceae 2 Yes Cyperaceae 1 Poaceae Hordeum 1 Yes Caryophyllaceae 17 Yes Poaceae Wild 7 Yes Light Fraction grams 0.11 Heavy Fraction grams 0.48 Analysist Other present: AA Date Analized 10/27/2009 Content % Rock 99 under LNL Family Count Charred Poaceae Wild 1