A tail bound for sums of independent random variables : application to the symmetric Pareto distribution

Similar documents
A Tail Bound For Sums Of Independent Random Variables And Application To The Pareto Distribution

STRONG DEVIATION THEOREMS FOR THE SEQUENCE OF CONTINUOUS RANDOM VARIABLES AND THE APPROACH OF LAPLACE TRANSFORM

Generalized Likelihood Functions and Random Measures

Applied Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 9, 2015, no. 3, HIKARI Ltd,

Chapter 9. Key Ideas Hypothesis Test (Two Populations)

u t u 0 ( 7) Intuitively, the maximum principles can be explained by the following observation. Recall

The Goldbach conjectures

Generalized Fibonacci Like Sequence Associated with Fibonacci and Lucas Sequences

Comments on Discussion Sheet 18 and Worksheet 18 ( ) An Introduction to Hypothesis Testing

On the behavior at infinity of an integrable function

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY 6.265/15.070J Fall 2013 Lecture 16 11/04/2013. Ito integral. Properties

PRIMARY DECOMPOSITION, ASSOCIATED PRIME IDEALS AND GABRIEL TOPOLOGY

TURBULENT FUNCTIONS AND SOLVING THE NAVIER-STOKES EQUATION BY FOURIER SERIES

STUDENT S t-distribution AND CONFIDENCE INTERVALS OF THE MEAN ( )

LECTURE 13 SIMULTANEOUS EQUATIONS

On the Signed Domination Number of the Cartesian Product of Two Directed Cycles

TESTS OF SIGNIFICANCE

List-Decoding of Binary Goppa Codes up to the Binary Johnson Bound

Improvement of Generic Attacks on the Rank Syndrome Decoding Problem

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY 6.436J/15.085J Fall 2008 Lecture 19 11/17/2008 LAWS OF LARGE NUMBERS II THE STRONG LAW OF LARGE NUMBERS

A Simple Proof of the Shallow Packing Lemma

On Certain Sums Extended over Prime Factors

20. CONFIDENCE INTERVALS FOR THE MEAN, UNKNOWN VARIANCE

Heat Equation: Maximum Principles

Société de Calcul Mathématique, S. A. Algorithmes et Optimisation

This section is optional.

100(1 α)% confidence interval: ( x z ( sample size needed to construct a 100(1 α)% confidence interval with a margin of error of w:

On the 2-Domination Number of Complete Grid Graphs

10-716: Advanced Machine Learning Spring Lecture 13: March 5

Fractional parts and their relations to the values of the Riemann zeta function

a 1 = 1 a a a a n n s f() s = Σ log a 1 + a a n log n sup log a n+1 + a n+2 + a n+3 log n sup () s = an /n s s = + t i

ST5215: Advanced Statistical Theory

Statistics and Chemical Measurements: Quantifying Uncertainty. Normal or Gaussian Distribution The Bell Curve

ON THE SCALE PARAMETER OF EXPONENTIAL DISTRIBUTION

Statistical Inference Procedures

Convergence of random variables. (telegram style notes) P.J.C. Spreij

6.3 Testing Series With Positive Terms

REVIEW OF SIMPLE LINEAR REGRESSION SIMPLE LINEAR REGRESSION

1 Convergence in Probability and the Weak Law of Large Numbers

A Note on the Kolmogorov-Feller Weak Law of Large Numbers

Explicit Maximal and Minimal Curves over Finite Fields of Odd Characteristics

Optimization Results for a Generalized Coupon Collector Problem

Confidence Intervals. Confidence Intervals

Expectation of the Ratio of a Sum of Squares to the Square of the Sum : Exact and Asymptotic results

SOLUTION: The 95% confidence interval for the population mean µ is x ± t 0.025; 49

Zeta-reciprocal Extended reciprocal zeta function and an alternate formulation of the Riemann hypothesis By M. Aslam Chaudhry

Riemann Paper (1859) Is False

INFINITE SEQUENCES AND SERIES

Self-normalized deviation inequalities with application to t-statistic

STA 4032 Final Exam Formula Sheet

Brief Review of Linear System Theory

On Uniform Exponential Trichotomy of Evolution Operators in Banach Spaces

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY 6.265/15.070J Fall 2013 Lecture 2 9/9/2013. Large Deviations for i.i.d. Random Variables

It is often useful to approximate complicated functions using simpler ones. We consider the task of approximating a function by a polynomial.

University of Colorado Denver Dept. Math. & Stat. Sciences Applied Analysis Preliminary Exam 13 January 2012, 10:00 am 2:00 pm. Good luck!

Fig. 1: Streamline coordinates

On the Positive Definite Solutions of the Matrix Equation X S + A * X S A = Q

x z Increasing the size of the sample increases the power (reduces the probability of a Type II error) when the significance level remains fixed.

62. Power series Definition 16. (Power series) Given a sequence {c n }, the series. c n x n = c 0 + c 1 x + c 2 x 2 + c 3 x 3 +

7.1 Convergence of sequences of random variables

ON POINTWISE BINOMIAL APPROXIMATION

THE ADAPTIVE LASSSO UNDER A GENERALIZED SPARSITY CONDITION. Joel L. Horowitz Department of Economics Northwestern University Evanston, IL

VIII. Interval Estimation A. A Few Important Definitions (Including Some Reminders)

Parameter Estimation for Discretely Observed Vasicek Model Driven by Small Lévy Noises

Testing the number of parameters with multidimensional MLP

AN APPLICATION OF HYPERHARMONIC NUMBERS IN MATRICES

Large deviations and Berry-Esseen bounds for hashing with linear probing

Matrix Geometric Method for M/M/1 Queueing Model With And Without Breakdown ATM Machines

ECE 901 Lecture 12: Complexity Regularization and the Squared Loss

Lecture 30: Frequency Response of Second-Order Systems

Advanced Stochastic Processes.

Complete Convergence for Asymptotically Almost Negatively Associated Random Variables

18.05 Problem Set 9, Spring 2014 Solutions

Erratum to: An empirical central limit theorem for intermittent maps

Explicit scheme. Fully implicit scheme Notes. Fully implicit scheme Notes. Fully implicit scheme Notes. Notes

Ma 530 Introduction to Power Series

State space systems analysis

Another Look at Estimation for MA(1) Processes With a Unit Root

Section 11.8: Power Series

A Study on a Subset of Absolutely. Convergent Sequence Space

Introduction to Extreme Value Theory Laurens de Haan, ISM Japan, Erasmus University Rotterdam, NL University of Lisbon, PT

Math 113 Exam 3 Practice

A criterion for easiness of certain SAT-problems

Rational Bounds for the Logarithm Function with Applications

Berry-Esseen bounds for self-normalized martingales

In this section, we show how to use the integral test to decide whether a series

IntroEcono. Discrete RV. Continuous RV s

Lecture 8: Convergence of transformations and law of large numbers

Introducing a Novel Bivariate Generalized Skew-Symmetric Normal Distribution

Symmetric Division Deg Energy of a Graph

ECE 330:541, Stochastic Signals and Systems Lecture Notes on Limit Theorems from Probability Fall 2002

Notes 19 : Martingale CLT

Mi-Hwa Ko and Tae-Sung Kim

We will look for series solutions to (1) around (at most) regular singular points, which without

Chapter 8.2. Interval Estimation

NORM ESTIMATES FOR BESSEL-RIESZ OPERATORS ON GENERALIZED MORREY SPACES

7.1 Convergence of sequences of random variables

Section 5.5. Infinite Series: The Ratio Test

Research Article Some E-J Generalized Hausdorff Matrices Not of Type M

Results on Vertex Degree and K-Connectivity in Uniform S-Intersection Graphs

Transcription:

A tail boud for um of idepedet radom variable : applicatio to the ymmetric Pareto ditributio Chritophe Cheeau To cite thi verio: Chritophe Cheeau. A tail boud for um of idepedet radom variable : applicatio to the ymmetric Pareto ditributio. Short ote. 27. <hal-1925> HAL Id: hal-1925 http://hal.archive-ouverte.fr/hal-1925 Submitted o 28 Nov 27 HAL i a multi-dicipliary ope acce archive for the depoit ad diemiatio of cietific reearch documet whether they are publihed or ot. The documet may come from teachig ad reearch ititutio i Frace or abroad or from public or private reearch ceter. L archive ouverte pluridicipliaire HAL et detiée au dépôt et à la diffuio de documet cietifique de iveau recherche publié ou o émaat de établiemet d eeigemet et de recherche fraçai ou étrager de laboratoire public ou privé.

Vol. 27 1 8 A tail boud for um of idepedet radom variable : applicatio to the ymmetric Pareto ditributio Chritophe Cheeau Laboratoire de Mathématique Nicola Oreme Uiverité de Cae Bae-Normadie Campu II Sciece 3 1432 Cae Frace. http://www.cheeau-tat.com cheeau@math.uicae.fr Abtract: I thi ote we prove a boud of the tail probability for a um of idepedet radom variable. It ca be applied uder mild aumptio; the variable are ot aumed to be almot urely abolutely bouded or admit fiite momet of all order. Moreover i ome cae it i igificatly better tha the boud obtaied via the tadard Markov iequality. To illutrate thi reult we ivetigate the boud of the tail probability for a um of weighted i.i.d. radom variable havig the ymmetric Pareto ditributio. AMS 2 ubject claificatio: 6E15. Keyword ad phrae: Tail boud ymmetric Pareto ditributio. 1. MOTIVATION Let Y i i N be idepedet radom variable. For ay N we wih to determie the mallet equece of fuctio p t uch that P Y i t p t t [ [. Thi problem i well-kow; umerou reult exit. The mot famou of them i the Markov iequality. Uder mild aumptio o the momet of the X i it give a polyomial boud p t. I may cae thi boud ca be improved. For itace if the X i are almot urely abolutely bouded or admit fiite momet of all order ad thee momet atify ome iequalitie the Bertei iequalitie provide better reult. The obtaied boud p t are expoetial. See Petrov 1995 ad Pollard 1984 for further detail ad complete bibliography. I thi ote we preet a ew iequality which provide a boud p t of the form p t = v t+w t where v t i polyomial ad w t i expoetial. It ca be applied uder mild aumptio o the X i ; a for the Markov iequality oly kowledge of the order of a fiite momet i required. The mai iteret of our iequality i that it ca be applied whe the Bertei coditio are 1 imart-geeric ver. 27/9/18 file: Sum-Pareto.tex date: November 2 27

Chritophe Cheeau/A tail boud for um of idepedet radom variable 2 ot atified ad ca give better reult tha the Markov iequality. I order to illutrate thi we ivetigate the boud of the tail probability for a um of weighted i.i.d. radom variable havig the ymmetric Pareto ditributio. Thi i particularly iteretig becaue the exact expreio of the ditributio of uch a um i really difficult to idetify. See for itace Ramay 26. Moreover there are ome applicatio i ecoomic actuarial ciece urvival aalyi ad queuig etwork. The ote i orgaized a follow. Sectio 2 preet the mai reult. I Sectio 3 we illutrate the ue of thi reult by coiderig the ymmetric Pareto ditributio. The techical proof are potpoed to Sectio 4. 2. MAIN RESULT Theorem 2.1 below preet a boud of the tail probability for a um of idepedet radom variable. A metioed i Sectio 1 it require kowledge oly of the order of a fiite momet. Theorem 2.1. Let Y i i N be idepedet radom variable. We uppoe that for ay N ad ay i {1... } we have w.l.o.g. EY i = there exit a real umber p 2 uch that for ay N ad ay i {1...} we have E Y i p <. The for ay t > ad ay N we have P Y i t C p t p max r p tr 2 t p/2 + exp t2 2.1 16b where for ay u {2p} r u t = Y E i u 1 { Yi 3b ad C p = 2 2p+1 max p p p p/2+1 e p x p/2 1 1 x p dx. b = E Yi 2 The proof of Theorem 2.1 ue trucatio techic the Roethal iequality ad oe of the Bertei iequalitie. See Roethal 197 ad Petrov 1995. Clearly Theorem 2.1 ca be applied for a wide cla of radom variable. However if the variable are almot urely abolutely bouded or have fiite momet of all order the Bertei iequalitie ca give more optimal reult tha 2.1. But whe thee coditio are ot atified Theorem 2.1 become of iteret. Thi fact i illutrated i Sectio 3 below for the ymmetric Pareto ditributio. Other example ca be tudied i a imilar fahio. 3. APPLICATION: SYMMETRIC PARETO DISTRIBUTION Propoitio 3.1 below ivetigate the boud of the tail probability for a um of weighted i.i.d. radom variable havig the ymmetric Pareto ditributio. imart-geeric ver. 27/9/18 file: Sum-Pareto.tex date: November 2 27

Chritophe Cheeau/A tail boud for um of idepedet radom variable 3 Propoitio 3.1. Let > 2 ad X i i N be i.i.d. radom variable with the probability deity fuctio fx = 2 1 x 1 1 { x 1}. Let a i i N be a equece of ozero real umber uch that a i <. The for ay N ay t 3b ρ where ρ = a i 1/ ad ay p 2 we have P a i X i t K p t 2p+ b p a i + exp t2 3.1 16b where b = 2 a2 i K p = 3 p max p 2 2p+1 max p p p p/2+1 e p x p/2 1 1 x p dx. 2 p/2 C p ad C p = Notice that ice the ditributio of the variable i ymmetric the cotat C p aociated to the Roethal iequality ca be improved. For it optimal form we refer to Ibragimov ad Sharakhmetov 1997. I the literature there exit everal reult o the approximatio of the tail probability of a um of i.i.d. radom variable havig the ymmetric Pareto ditributio. But to our kowledge cotrary to Propoitio 3.1 thee reult are aymptotic i.e. t. See for itace Goovaert Kaa Laeve Tag ad Veric 25. Illutratio. Here we coider a imple example to compare the preciio betwee 3.1 ad the boud obtaied via the Markov iequality. Let > 2 ad X i i N be i.i.d. radom variable with the probability deity fuctio fx = 2 1 x 1 1 { x 1}. For ay iteger uch that 1/2 1/ log 1/2 > 2 3/2 3 1/2 ad ay p max 2 2 if we take t = t = 2 3/2 log 1/2 the we ca balace the two term of the boud i 3.1; there exit two cotat Q 1 > ad Q 2 > uch that P X i t Q 1 1 /2 log p+/2 + 1 /2 Q 2 1 /2. 3.2 Uder the ame framework for ay p < the Markov iequality combied with the Roethal iequality ee Lemma 4.1 below implie the exitece of two cotat R 1 > ad R 2 > uch that P X i t t p E p X i R 1 t p p/2 R 2 log p/2. 3.3 Therefore for large eough the rate of covergece i 3.2 i really fater tha thoe i 3.3. I thi cae 3.1 give a better reult tha the Markov iequality. imart-geeric ver. 27/9/18 file: Sum-Pareto.tex date: November 2 27

Chritophe Cheeau/A tail boud for um of idepedet radom variable 4 4. PROOFS. Proof of Theorem 2.1. Let N. For ay t > we have P Y i t = P Y i EY i t U + V where ad U = P V = P Y i 1 { Yi 3b E Y i 1 { Yi 3b t 2 Y i 1 { Yi < 3b E Y i 1 { Yi < 3b t. 2 Let u boud U ad V i tur. The upper boud for U. The Markov iequality yield U 2 p t p E p Y i 1 { Yi 3b E Y i 1 { Yi 3b. 4.1 Now let u itroduce the Roethal iequality. See Roethal 197. Lemma 4.1 Roethal iequality. Let p 2 ad X i i N be idepedet radom variable uch that for ay N ad ay i {1... } we have EX i = ad E X i p <. The we have p E X i c p max E X i p E X 2 p/2 i where c p = 2 max p p p p/2+1 e p x p/2 1 1 x p dx. For ay i {1... } et Z i = Y i 1 { Yi 3b E Y i 1 { Yi 3b. Sice EZ i = ad E Z i p 2 p E Y i p 1 { Yi 2 p E Y 3b i p < Lemma 4.1 applied to the idepedet variable Z i i N give p E Z i c p max E Z i p E Z 2 p/2 i 4.2 where c p = 2max p p p p/2+1 e p x p/2 1 1 x p dx. imart-geeric ver. 27/9/18 file: Sum-Pareto.tex date: November 2 27

Chritophe Cheeau/A tail boud for um of idepedet radom variable 5 It follow from 4.1 ad 4.2 that U 2 p t p c p max E Z i p E Zi 2 2 2p t p c p max E Y i p 1 { Yi 3b p/2 E Yi 2 1 { Yi 3b = C p t p max r p tr 2 t p/2 4.3 where C p = 2 2p c p. The upper boud for V. Let u preet oe of the Bertei iequalitie. See for itace Petrov 1995. Lemma 4.2 Bertei iequality. Let X i i N be idepedet radom variable uch that for ay N ad ay i {1... } we have EX i = ad X i M <. The for ay λ > ad ay N we have λ 2 P X i λ exp 2d 2 + λm 3 where d 2 = EX2 i. For ay i {1... } et Z i = Y i 1 { Yi < 3b E Y i 1 { Yi < 3b. Sice EZ i = ad Z i Y i 1 { Yi < 3b + E Y i 1 { Yi < 3b 6b t Lemma 4.2 applied with the idepedet variable Z i i N ad the parameter λ = t 2 ad M = 6b t give V exp 8 Y V i 1 { Yi < 3b t 2 + t 6b. 6 t Sice Y V i 1 { Yi < 3b E Yi 2 = b it come V exp t2. 4.4 16b Puttig 4.3 ad 4.4 together we obtai the iequality P Y i t U + V C p t p max r p t r 2 t p/2 + exp t2. 16b Theorem 2.1 i proved. imart-geeric ver. 27/9/18 file: Sum-Pareto.tex date: November 2 27

Chritophe Cheeau/A tail boud for um of idepedet radom variable 6. Proof of Propoitio 3.1. Let N. Set for ay i {1... } Y i = a i X i. Clearly Y i i N are idepedet radom variable uch that EY i = a i EX i = ad EY i 2 = 2 a2 i <. I order to apply Theorem 2.1 let u boud the term r u t = Y E i u 1 { Yi 3b = a i u E X i u 1 { } for ay u {2p} ad ay p max X i 3b 2 2. a i t Recall that ρ = a i 1/. Sice t 3b ρ 3b σ where σ = up... a i we have E X i u 1 { } = X i 3b 3b x u 1 dx = a i t a i t u 3b a i t u. Hece r u t = u 3b a i. u t Therefore max r p tr 2 t p/2 p 3b p/2 3b R p max 3b t tρ tρ where R p = max p 2 p/2. 3b 3b p/2 Sice t 3b ρ ad p > 2 we have max tρ tρ 3b tρ. Hece max r p tr 2 t p/2 p 3b R p a i. 4.5 t Puttig 4.5 i Theorem 2.1 we obtai P a i X i t K p t 2p+ b p a i + exp t2 16b where b = 2 a2 i K p = 3 p max p 2 = p/2 C p ad C p = 2 2p+1 max p p p p/2+1 e p x p/2 1 1 x p dx. Propoitio 3.1 i proved. Referece Goovaert M. Kaa R. Laeve R. Tag Q. ad Veric R. 25. The Tail Probability of Dicouted Sum of Pareto-like Loe i Iurace. Scadiavia Actuarial Joural Iue 6 November 25 pp. 446-461 imart-geeric ver. 27/9/18 file: Sum-Pareto.tex date: November 2 27

Chritophe Cheeau/A tail boud for um of idepedet radom variable 7 Ibragimov R. ad Sharakhmetov Sh. 1997. O a exact cotat for the Roethal iequality Theory Probab. Appl. 42 pp. 29432. Petrov V. V. 1995. Limit Theorem of Probability Theory Claredo Pre Oxford. Pollard D. 1984. Covergece of Stochatic Procee Spriger New York. Ramay Coli M. 26 The ditributio of um of certai i.i.d. Pareto variate. Commu. Stat. Theory Method. 35 No.1-3 pp. 395-45. Roethal H. P. 197. O the ubpace of L p p 2 paed by equece of idepedet radom variable Irael Joural of Mathematic 8: pp. 273-33. imart-geeric ver. 27/9/18 file: Sum-Pareto.tex date: November 2 27