Probabilistic production cost simulation. EG2200 Lectures 12 14, autumn 2015 Mikael Amelin

Similar documents
RTO Winter Resource Adequacy Assessment Status Report

APPENDIX 7.4 Capacity Value of Wind Resources

Monte Carlo Simulation in Engineering

A PROBABILISTIC MODEL FOR POWER GENERATION ADEQUACY EVALUATION

Bringing Renewables to the Grid. John Dumas Director Wholesale Market Operations ERCOT

Renewables and the Smart Grid. Trip Doggett President & CEO Electric Reliability Council of Texas

The Spatial Analysis of Wind Power on Nodal Prices in New Zealand

Chapter 2. Planning Criteria. Turaj Amraee. Fall 2012 K.N.Toosi University of Technology

Power System Seminar Presentation Wind Forecasting and Dispatch 7 th July, Wind Power Forecasting tools and methodologies

UPDATE ELECTRICITY STATEMENT OF OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE NATIONAL ELECTRICITY MARKET

Total Market Demand Wed Jan 02 Thu Jan 03 Fri Jan 04 Sat Jan 05 Sun Jan 06 Mon Jan 07 Tue Jan 08

Comparing Variance Reduction Techniques for Monte Carlo Simulation of Trading and Security in a Three-Area Power System

Wind power and management of the electric system. EWEA Wind Power Forecasting 2015 Leuven, BELGIUM - 02/10/2015

Recent US Wind Integration Experience

LECTURE 22 WIND POWER SYSTEMS. ECE 371 Sustainable Energy Systems

FORECAST ACCURACY REPORT 2017 FOR THE 2016 NATIONAL ELECTRICITY FORECASTING REPORT

Capacity Scarcity Condition Monday, September 3, 2018 Two primary factors led to the implementation of OP 4 event Significant generation outages and r

California Independent System Operator (CAISO) Challenges and Solutions

WIND energy has become a mature technology and has

About Nnergix +2, More than 2,5 GW forecasted. Forecasting in 5 countries. 4 predictive technologies. More than power facilities

PROJECT ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

EVALUATION OF WIND ENERGY SOURCES INFLUENCE ON COMPOSITE GENERATION AND TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS RELIABILITY

Analysis and Comparison of Risk and Load Point Indices of Power System Model HLI and HLII

-Assessment of current water conditions. - Precipitation Forecast. - Recommendations for Drought Monitor

Average Cold Spell Methodology

A possible notion of short-term value-based reliability

Energy Forecasting Customers: Analysing end users requirements Dec 3rd, 2013 Carlos Alberto Castaño, PhD Head of R&D

LOOP frequency estimates due to external events

Mathematics - Course 121 THE BINOMIAL DISTRIBUTION AND POWER SYSTEM RELIABILITY

SYSTEM BRIEF DAILY SUMMARY

Confronting Climate Change in the Great Lakes Region. Technical Appendix Climate Change Projections EXTREME EVENTS

It is never so good as expected and never so bad as feared.

Battery Energy Storage

Modelling wind power in unit commitment models

EVALUATION OF ALGORITHM PERFORMANCE 2012/13 GAS YEAR SCALING FACTOR AND WEATHER CORRECTION FACTOR

SYSTEM BRIEF DAILY SUMMARY

Peak Load Forecasting

2013 WEATHER NORMALIZATION SURVEY. Industry Practices

Probabilistic Decision-Making and Weather Assessment

International Workshop on Wind Energy Development Cairo, Egypt. ERCOT Wind Experience

EUROPEAN EXPERIENCE: Large-scale cross-country forecasting with the help of Ensemble Forecasts

International Studies about the Grid Integration of Wind Generation

Day Ahead Hourly Load and Price Forecast in ISO New England Market using ANN

ABSTRACT. WANG, SHU. Reliability Assessment of Power Systems with Wind Power Generation. (Under the direction of Dr. Mesut E Baran.

Complementary Random Numbers Dagger Sampling. Lecture 4, autumn 2015 Mikael Amelin

Modelling trends in the ocean wave climate for dimensioning of ships

The Energy Markets. Use and interpretation of medium to extended range products. ECMWF, Reading, 14 th of November 2005

Importance Sampling Stratified Sampling. Lecture 6, autumn 2015 Mikael Amelin

peak half-hourly Tasmania

Prediction of Power System Balancing Requirements and Tail Events

peak half-hourly New South Wales

Into Avista s Electricity Forecasts. Presented by Randy Barcus Avista Chief Economist Itron s Energy Forecaster s Group Meeting

Proper Security Criteria Determination in a Power System with High Penetration of Renewable Resources

OFFSHORE INTEGRATION STUDY. Analysis, benchmark and mitigation of storm and ramping risks from offshore wind power in Belgium 05/02/2018

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2012

peak half-hourly South Australia

Anemos.Rulez: Extreme Event Prediction and Alarming to Support Stability of Energy Grids

Winter Season Resource Adequacy Analysis Status Report

Verification challenges in developing TC response procedures based on ensemble guidance

Cost of Inflow Forecast Uncertainty for Day Ahead Hydropower Production Scheduling

Calibrating forecasts of heavy precipitation in river catchments

WeatherManager Weekly

Using Innovative Displays of Hydrologic Ensemble Traces

Discussion of Load Forecast Uncertainty

The Forecasting Challenge. The Forecasting Challenge CEEM,

Spring Water Supply and Weather Outlook How about that near Miracle March?

1. Wind turbines are designed to operate within specified design criteria. Often the operating environment extends beyond these limits and causes

Prashant Pant 1, Achal Garg 2 1,2 Engineer, Keppel Offshore and Marine Engineering India Pvt. Ltd, Mumbai. IJRASET 2013: All Rights are Reserved 356

Skilful seasonal predictions for the European Energy Industry

2014 FORECASTING BENCHMARK AND OUTLOOK SURVEY. Mark Quan and Stuart McMenamin September 16, 2014 Forecasting Brown Bag Seminar

Optimization of the forecasting of wind energy production Focus on the day ahead forecast

The impact of climate change on wind energy resources

Use of Normals in Load Forecasting at National Grid

AESO Load Forecast Application for Demand Side Participation. Eligibility Working Group September 26, 2017

Colorado PUC E-Filings System

The Study of Overhead Line Fault Probability Model Based on Fuzzy Theory

Demand Forecasting Reporting Period: 1 st Apr th Jun 17

Integrated Electricity Demand and Price Forecasting

Developing a Mathematical Model Based on Weather Parameters to Predict the Daily Demand for Electricity

Changes in Weather and Climate Extremes and Their Causes. Xuebin Zhang (CRD/ASTD) Francis Zwiers (PCIC)

A Model for a Zonal Operating Reserve Demand Curve

Operations Report. Tag B. Short, Director South Region Operations. Entergy Regional State Committee (ERSC) February 14, 2018

Power System Research Group Electrical Engineering Dept., University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, Canada

West Henrico Co. - Glen Allen Weather Center N W. - Koontz

SMART GRID FORECASTING

Chapter 6 Impact of Stochastic Renewable Energy Generation on Market Quantities 6.1 Introduction

The influence of the unit commitment plan on the variance of electric power. production cost. Jinchi Li

Ellen L. Mecray NOAA Regional Climate Services Director, Eastern Region Taunton, MA

Centralized Forecasting Registration and Communication Requirements for Distribution Connected Variable Generators. IESO Training

Mid-term Adequacy Forecast 2018

THUNDERSTORMS Brett Ewing October, 2003

The Role of Weather in Risk Management For the Market Technician s Association October 15, 2013

NSP Electric - Minnesota Annual Report Peak Demand and Annual Electric Consumption Forecast

Pb1 y13 =-j10 Pb5. Pb4. y34 =-j10

elgian energ imports are managed using forecasting software to increase overall network e 칁 cienc.

SHORT TERM LOAD FORECASTING

Q-V droop control using fuzzy logic and reciprocal characteristic

POWER SYSTEM OPERATING PROCEDURE LOAD FORECASTING

Value of Forecasts in Unit Commitment Problems

UNBILLED ESTIMATION. UNBILLED REVENUE is revenue which had been recognized but which has not been billed to the purchaser.

Transcription:

Probabilistic production cost simulation EG2200 Lectures 12 14, autumn 2015 Mikael Amelin 1

Course objectives Apply probabilistic production cost simulation to calculate the expected operation cost and risk of power deficit in an electricity market, and to use the results of a simulation to judge the consequences of various actions in the electricity market. 2

Probabilistic production cost simulation (PPC) Development started in the late 1960s. Analytical method. Limited possibilities to consider the electricity market in detail. 3

Electricity market model Assume Perfect competition Perfect information Load is not price sensitive Neglect grid losses and limitations Neglect start-up costs and ramp rate limitations All inputs are independent (Some of these assumptions can be avoided with clever modelling.) 4

Calculation of system indices Basic concept Assume all power plants have 100% availability. System indices can then be calculated directly from the load duration curve (LDC). Example Known load duration curve. Two power plants, 300 MW each, always available, variable operation costs 1 and 2 respectively, 1 2. 5

Calculation of system indices Basic concept LOLP = LDC(600) = 876 h/year = 10%. h/year 8760 LDC LOLP x 200 400 600 800 MW 6

Calculation of system indices Basic concept EENS = 600 LDCxdx. h/year 8760 LDC 200 400 EENS 600 800 x MW 7

Calculation of system indices Basic concept ETOC = 1 EG 1 + 2 EG 2 Perfect competion Unit 1 is used first as 1 2 h/year LDC 8760 EG 1 EG 2 200 400 600 800 x MW 8

Load model We only consider the total load of the system. The load is assumed to be price insensitive. - The load is modelled by one input, D. - The probability distribution of the load is represented by a duration curve. 9

Load model How is the load duration curve determined? The probability distribution of the load cannot be computed but must be estimated from historical data and forecasts for the future. Alternative 1. Use a standard probability distribution (for example the normal distribution) with the same statistical properties as historical data. Alternative 2. Create a duration curve directly from historical data (or forecasts). 10

Load model Duration curve from historical data Definition 6.11. The load curve states the load at a certain time, i.e., D(k) = load hour k [MWh/h]. Definition 6.12. The real load duration curve states the load level that is exceeded for a certain time, i.e., LDC R (k) = load level that is exceeded during k hours [MWh/h]. 11

Load model Duration curve from historical data Exempel 6.9: MWh/h D(k) E[D] = 12 600 MWh/day 6 12 18 24 h The expectation value of the load is equal to the area below the load curve. k 12

Load model Duration curve from historical data Exempel 6.9: MWh/h D(k), LDC R (k) E[D] = 12 600 MWh/day 6 12 18 24 h The area below the real duration curve is as large as the area below the load curve. k 13

Load model Duration curve from historical data Definition 6.13. The inverted load duration curve states how long time a certain load level is exceeded, i.e., LDC(x) = number of hours when the load is exceeding x [h]. Dividing LDC(x) by the length of the studied time period, T, gives the normalised load duration curve. The normalised duration curve states the probability that a certain load level is exceeded (cf. definition C.3). 14

Load model Duration curve from historical data Exempel 6.10: h LDC(x) E[D] = 12 600 MWh/day 200 400 600 800 MWh/h We have only switched the y and x axes; hence, the area below the curve has not changed. x 15

Load model Duration curve from historical data Exempel 6.10: % F D 200 400 600 800 MWh/h Now, the y-axis has been scaled by 1/T; the expected load is therefore the area below the curve multiplied by T. x 16

Load model Discrete approximation The load is in reality a continuous random variable. To compute expected energy etc. we need to integrate the load duration curve, which in general will be done using numerical methods. It might therefore be necessary to use a discrete approximation of the probability distribution of the load. 17

Load model Discrete approximation % F D 200 400 600 800 x MWh/h 18

Model of thermal power plants The following properties are included in the model of thermal power plants: Installed capacity, Ĝ g. - Ramp rates are neglected. Generation cost, C Gg (G g ) = + G g. - The variable cost is independent of generation level, i.e., constant efficiency. - Start-up costs are neglected. Availability, p g. Moreover, it is assumed that failures are independent of the load and the state of other power plants. 19

Model of thermal power plants A thermal power plant is modelled by one input, G g (available generation capacity) and a constant variable operation cost, Gg. It is assumed that the available generation capacity has a two-point distribution. F Gg p g q g x 0 Ĝ g MW 20

Model of thermal power plants How are the parameters of the two point distribution determined? The probability distribution of the available generation capacity cannot be computed but must be estimated from historical data and forecasts for the future. 21

Model of thermal power plants Availability from historical data Definition 6.14. The Mean Time To Failure is calculated by MTTF = K 1 --- t K u k, k = 1 where K are the number of periods when the power plant is available and t u (k) is the duration of each of these periods. 22

Model of thermal power plants Availability from historical data Definition 6.15. The Mean Time To Repair is calculated by MTTR = K 1 --- t K d k, k = 1 where K are the number of periods when the power plant is unavailable and t d (k) is the duration of each of these periods. 23

Model of thermal power plants Availability from historical data Definition 6.16. The failure rate is the probability that an available unit will fail and can be estimated by = 1 ---------------. MTTF Definition 6.16. The repair rate is the probability that an unavailable unit will be repaired and can be estimated by = 1 ---------------. MTTR 24

Model of thermal power plants Availability from historical data Definition 6.18. The availability is the probability that a power plant will be available and can be estimated as the share of a longer time period during which the unit is available: MTTF p = = -------------------------------------- = MTTF + MTTR ------------- +. Definition 6.18. The unavailability is the probability that a power plant will be unavailable and can be estimated by q = 1 p = -------------------------------------- MTTR = MTTF + MTTR ------------- +. 25

Model of thermal power plants Availability and utilisation Availability. Probability that a power plant can be used. Capacity factor. The average available capacity divided by the installed capacity. 1 capacity factor = TĜ ------- T t = 1 G t. Utilisation factor. The average real generation divided by the installed capacity. 1 utilisation factor = capacity factor. TĜ ------- T t = 1 G t Full load hours. The number of hours a unit would be able generate its full capacity without exceeding the real annual generation. full load hours = 1 Ĝ --- T t = 1 G t = T utilisation factor. 26

Equivalent load We have seen that it is straightforward to compute the system indices in a power system where all power plants have 100% availability. What do we do if this is not the case? Brilliant idea: Consider outages in power plants as load increase instead of lower available generation capacity. 27

Equivalent load Definition 6.14. The equivalent load is given by E g = D + O k, where g k = 1 E g = equivlanet load seen by power plant g +1, D = real load, O k = outage in power plant k. 28

Equivalent load Example MWh/h D(k) MWh/h E 2 (k) k k 6 12 18 24 h 6 12 18 24 h D E 2 G 1 G 1 + G 2 29

Calculation of system indices The system indices LOLP, EENS and ETOC can be computed from the equivalent load duration curve, Introduce the symbols F g x. g g g Gtot g = G k, Ĝtot = Ĝ and Otot = O. g k g k k = 1 k = 1 k = 1 30

Calculation of system indices Risk of power deficit Power deficit occurs when the load is higher than the available generation capacity, i.e., LOLP g = PD = PD Ĝtot g Otot g = G g tot PD + Otot g Ĝ = PE g Ĝ = F gĝtot g. g tot g tot 31

Calculation of system indices Unserved energy Everything to the right of in the equivalent load duration curve corresponds to load that cannot be served due to power deficit. Ĝ g tot EENS g = T Ĝ g tot F gxdx. Remember to scale by the time period considered see page 16! 32

Calculation of system indices Expected generation Remember that in the equivalent load we are assuming that all power plants are always available and add load instead. The expected generation can therefore not be computed directly from the equivalent load duration curve. However, it can be computed indirectly by comparing the unserved energy with and without a power plant: EG g = EENS g 1 EENS g. 33

Calculation of system indices Expected generation For two-state generating units, the expected generation of power plant g can be computed directly from : F g 1 x EG g = Ĝ g tot T p g F g 1xdx. tot Ĝ g 1 34

Calculation of system indices Expected total operation cost The expected total operation cost is computed from the expected generation in each power plant: ETOC g = g k = 1 k EG k. If there is a cost for load that is disconnected then that can be included as well: ETOC g = g k = 1 k EG k + U EENS g. 35

Calculation of system indices Example Run-of-the river hydro (500 kw, 0 /kwh, 100% availability). Diesel generator set (200 kw, 1 /kwh, 90% availability). Load (N(400,80)-distributed, not price sensitive). 36

Calculation of system indices Example 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 F 0 F 1 A = 100 A = 99,84 A = 96,11 A = 72,12 A = 27,87 A = 3,89 A = 0,16 200 400 600 800 1 000 kw A = 0 x EENS 1 = 1 F 1xdx 500 = 3.89 + 0.16 = 4.05 kwh/h. 37

Calculation of system indices Example 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 F 2 A = 100 A = 99,86 A = 96,50 A = 74,90 A = 34,69 A = 10,71 A = 2,93 A = 0,39 A = 0,02 A = 0 x 200 400 600 800 1 000 kw EENS 2 = 1 F 2xdx 700 = 0.39 + 0.02 = 0.41 kwh/h. 38

Calculation of system indices Example 1 F 2 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 A = 100 A = 99,86 A = 96,50 A = 74,90 A = 34,69 A = 10,71 A = 2,93 A = 0,39 A = 0,02 A = 0 x 200 400 600 800 1 000 kw LOLP = F 2700 1%. EG 2 = EENS 1 EENS 2 = 4.05 0.41 = 3.64 kwh/h. ETOC = 1 EG 2 = 3.64 /h. 39

Equivalent load duration curve Derivation F gx = P(E g > x) = P(D + O 1 + + O g 1 + O g > x). The probability distribution of a sum of independent random variables can be computed using convolution. The formula for computing equivalent load duration curves can also be understood as follows: - Assume that the equivalent load duration curve without power plant g, F g 1x, is known. - What is the probability that the equivalent load exceeds x if power plant g is available? - What is the probability that the equivalent load exceeds x if power plant g is unavailable? - Combine the results. 40

Equivalent load duration curve Derivation Power plant g is available E g = D + O 1 + + O g 1 + O g. O g = 0 E g = D + O 1 + + O g 1 = E g 1. Hence, PE g x G g = Ĝ g = P(E g 1 > x) = F g 1x. 41

Equivalent load duration curve Derivation Power plant g is unavailable E g = D + O 1 + + O g 1 + O g. O g = Ĝ g E g = D + O 1 + + O g 1 + Ĝ g = E g 1 + Ĝ g. Hence, PE g x G g = 0 Ĝ g = P(E g 1 + > x) = = P(E g 1 > x Ĝ g ) = F g 1x Ĝ g. 42

Equivalent load duration curve Derivation The probability that the equivalent load exceeds x is then P(E g > x) = p g PE g x + q g PE g x = G g = Ĝ g G g = 0 = F gx = p g F g 1x + q g F g 1x Ĝ g. The formula above is an example of a convolution formula. Starting from the load duration curve, F 0x (which is an input to the simulation), the equivalent load duration curves can be computed by adding one power plant at a time. Power plants should be added according to merit order, i.e., according to increasing variable costs (as we assume perfect competition). 43

Probabilistic production cost simulation Example I Problem description Load - 200 kwh/h Mon Fri 5 19, Sat Sun 10 17-100 kwh/h all other times Power plants - Diesel generator set 150 kwh/h, 90% availability, 10 /kwh. - Diesel generator set 100 kwh/h, 80% availability, 12 /kwh. Compute ETOC and LOLP. 44

Probabilistic production cost simulation Example I Solution The frequency function of the load can be computed from the given data: 84 168 = 0.5 x = 100, f 0 (x) = P(D = x) = 84 168 = 0.5 x = 200, 0 all other x. From theorem C.4 we then have F 0x = f 0 t = t x 0.5 + 0.5 = 1 x 100, 0.5 100 x 200, 0 200 x. 45

Probabilistic production cost simulation Example I % 100 80 60 40 20 EENS 0 = f 0 x F 0 x 100 200 300 400 500 kwh/h 1 F 0xdx 0 = 100 1 + 100 0.5 = 150 kwh/h. x 46

Probabilistic production cost simulation Example I The larger diesel generator set is first in the merit order: F 1x = 0. F 0x + 0. F 0x 150 = = 0. 1 + 0. 1 = 1 0. 0. + 0. 1 = 0. 0 + 0. 1 = 0. 0. 0 + 0. 0. = 0 0. 0. x 100, 100 x 200, 200 x 250, 250 x 350, 350 x. 47

Probabilistic production cost simulation Example I % 100 80 60 40 20 F 0x F 1x x 100 200 300 400 500 kwh/h EENS 1 = 1 F 1xdx = 50 0.55 + 50 0.1 + 100 0.05= 150 = 37.5 kwh/h. 48

Probabilistic production cost simulation Example I Next, we add the smaller diesel generator set: F 2x = 0.8 F 1x + 0. F 1x 100 = 0. 1 + 0. 1 = 1 x 100, 0. 0. + 0. 1 = 0. 100 x 200, 0. 0. + 0. 0. = 0. 200 x 250, = 0. 0. + 0. 0. = 0. 250 x 300, 0. 0. + 0. 0. = 0. 300 x 350, 0. 0 + 0. 0. = 0. 350 x 450, 0 450 x. 49

Probabilistic production cost simulation Example I % 100 80 60 40 20 F 0x F 1x F 2x x 100 200 300 400 500 kwh/h EENS 2 = 1 F 2xdx = 50 0.15 + 50 0.06 + 100 0.01 = 250 = 11.5 kwh/h. 50

Probabilistic production cost simulation Example I EG 1 = EENS 0 EENS 1 = 112.5 kwh/h EG 2 = EENS 1 EENS 2 = 26.0 kwh/h ETOC = 10EG 1 + 12EG 2 = 1 437 /h LOLP = F 2250 = 15% 51

Model of wind power The following properties are included in the model of wind power plants: Installed capacity, Ŵ n. Generation cost, C Wn (W n ) = + W n. - The variable cost is generally negligible. Availability, p. Wind speed distribution, F v. Moreover, it is assumed that failures and wind speed are independent of each other as well as of the load and the state of other power plants. 52

Model of wind power A wind power plant or a wind farm (i.e., a group of wind power plants) can be represented by a single input, W n (available generation capacity) and a constant variable operation cost, Wn (which can generally be assumed as zero). The density function for W n can be computed by combining the probability distribution of the wind speed by the power curve (the wind power generation as a function of wind speed), i.e., W n v. - See the course compendium for details. 53

Model of wind power The probability distribution of the wind speed must be estimated from historical data or forecasts (similar to the probability distribution of the load). A standard probability distributions that is commonly used for wind speeds is the Rayleigh distribution. f v F v low v v = mean wind speed high v x low v high v x m/s m/s 54

Model of wind power The power curve depends on the type of wind power plant. Pitch control Stall control kw W(v) kw W(v) v m/s v m/s 55

Model of wind power Discrete approximation The available wind power generation capacity is a continuous random variable. To apply the convolution formula it is preferable to have a discrete probability distribution. It is therefore preferable to use a discrete approximation of the probability distribution of the available wind power generation capacity. 56

Model of wind power Discrete approximation f W x x Ŵ kw 57

Equivalent load duration curve General formula The convolution formula for the equivalent load duration curve can be generalised as follows: F gx = N g p gi F g 1 i = 1 x x g i, where N g = number of states for power plant g, p g, i = f G G = = probability of state i, g g f G Ĝ g x g g i x g, i = outage (compared to installed capacity) in state i. 58

Equivalent load duration curve General formula Verification for thermal power plants: N g = 2 p g, 1 = p g, x g, 1 = 0 p g, 2 = q g, x g, 2 = Ĝ g Using these values in the general formula for the equivalent load duration curve yields F gx = N g p gi F g 1 i = 1 x x g i = p g F g 1x+ q g F g 1x Ĝ g, i.e., the same expression as we used earlier. = 59

Probabilistic production cost simulation Example II Problem description Load - 200 kwh/h Mon Fri 5 19, Sat Sun 10 17-100 kwh/h all other times Power plants - Diesel generator set 150 kwh/h, 90% availability, 10 /kwh. - Diesel generator set 100 kwh/h, 80% availability, 12 /kwh. - Wind power plant 100 kwh/h (20%), 50 kwh/h (30%), 0 kwh/h (50%), negligible variable costs. Compute ETOC and LOLP. 60

Probabilistic production cost simulation Example II Solution The load duration curve, F 0x, is the same as in example I. The first power plant in the merit order is now the wind power plant. Model of the wind power plant: - N 1 = 3 - p 1, 1 = 0.2, x 1, 1 = 0 - p 1, 2 = 0.3, x 1, 2 = 50 - p 1, 3 = 0.5, x 1, 3 = 100 61

Probabilistic production cost simulation Example II F 1x = 0.2 F 0x + 0. F 0x 50+ 0. F 0x 100 = 0.2 1 0. 1 0. + + 1 = 1 0.2 0. + 0. 1 + 0. 1 = 0.9 0.2 0. + 0. 0. + 0. 1 = = 0.2 0 + 0. 0. + 0. 0.5 = 0.4 0.2 0 + 0. 0+ 0. 0.5 = 0.25 0 0.75 x 100, 100 x 150, 150 x 200, 200 x 250, 250 x 300, 300 x. 62

Probabilistic production cost simulation Example II % 100 80 60 40 20 F 0x F 1x 100 200 300 400 500 kwh/h G EENS 1 = 1 F 1xdx = 50 0.9 + 50 0.75 + 50 0.4 + 50 0.25 = 100 = 115 kwh/h. x 63

Probabilistic production cost simulation Example II F 2x = 0. F 1x + 0. F 1x 150 = = 0. 1 + 0. 1 = 1 x 100, 0. 0. + 0. 1 = 0. 100 x 150, 0. 0. + 0. 1 = 0. 150 x 200, 0. 0. + 0. 1 = 0. 200 x 250, 0. 0. + 0. 0. = 0. 250 x 300, 0. 0 + 0. 0. = 0. 300 x 350, 0. 0 + 0. 0. = 0. 350 x 400, 0. 0 + 0. 0. = 0. 400 x 450, 0 450 x. 64

Probabilistic production cost simulation Example II % 100 80 60 40 20 F 0x F 1x F 2x 100 200 300 400 500 kwh/h EENS 2 = 1 F 2xdx = 250 = 50 0.315 + 50 0.075 + 50 0.04 + 50 0.025 = 22.75 kwh/h. x G 65

Probabilistic production cost simulation Example II F 3x = 0.8 F 2x + 0. F 2x 100 = = 0. 1 + 0. 1 = 1 x 100, 0. 0. + 0. 1 = 0. 100 x 150, 0. 0. + 0. 1 = 0. 150 x 200, 0. 0. + 0. 0. = 0. 200 x 250, 0. 0. + 0. 0. = 0. 250 x 300, 66

Probabilistic production cost simulation Example II = 0. 0. + 0. 0. = 0. 0. + 0. 0. = 0. 0. + 0. 0. = 0. 0 + 0. 0. = 0. 0 + 0. 0. = 0 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 300 x 350, 350 x 400, 400 x 450, 450 x 500, 500 x 550, 550 x. 67

Probabilistic production cost simulation Example II % 100 80 60 40 20 F 0x F 1x F 2x F 3x 100 200 300 400 500 kwh/h EENS 3 = 1 F 3xdx = 350 = 50 0.095 + 50 0.035 + 50 0.008 + 50 0.005 = 7.15 kwh/h. x G 68

Probabilistic production cost simulation Example II EG 2 = EENS 1 EENS 2 = 92.25 kwh/h EG 3 = EENS 2 EENS 3 = 15.6 kwh/h ETOC = 10EG 2 + 12EG 3 = 1 109.70 /h LOLP = F 3350 = 9.5% 69

Wind power Correlation between wind power generation and load Available wind power generation, W, and demand, D, are both depending on weather conditions and might thus be correlated. Annual variations. Some seasons are more windy and colder than others. - Cold weather low load in warm countries. - Warm weather high load in cold countries. Daily variations. More windy and lower load during night time. Special variations. Windy and cold increased load in buildings with electric heating. 70

Example: Daily variations Problem Day time 7:00-21:00, night time 21:00-7:00. Load - Day time: 250 kw (10%), 200 kw (30%), 150 kw (30%), 100 kw (30%) - Night time: 150 kw (20%), 100 kw, (40%), 50 kw (40%) Diesel generator set 200 kw, 95% availability Wind power - Day time: 200 kw (30%), 100 kw (40%), 0 kw (30%) - Night time: 200 kw (40%), 100 kw (50%), 0 kw (10%) 71

Example: Daily variations Solution % 100 80 60 40 20 F 0 day F night 0 x 50 100 150 200 250 kwh/h G 72

Example: Daily variations Solution Compute LOLP for day time: LOLP day = F 2400 = 0. F 1400 + 0. F 1400 200 = 0.(0. F 0400 + 0. F 0400 100 + 0. F 0400 200) + 0.05(0.3 F 0200 + 0. F 0200 100 + 0. F 0200 200) = 0.95(0.3 0 + 0.4 0 + 0.3 0.1) + 0.05(0.3 0.1 + 0.4 0.7 + 0.3 1) = 0.059 = 5.9%. 73

Example: Daily variations Solution Compute LOLP for night time: LOLP night = = 2.%. To compute the system LOLP regardless of time, the results above are weighted according to the duration of the corresponding time period: 14 day 10 LOLP = -----LOLP + -----LOLP night = 4.5%. 24 24 74