PLANT COMMUNITIES OF CULTIVATED FIELDS OF THE PODLASKI PRZEŁOM BUGU MESOREGION PART VI. COMMUNITIES OF ROOT CROPS ON COMPACT SOILS

Similar documents
Galeopsido-Galinsogetum POLDINI et al in NW Slovenia

Weed resistance in European cereal production: Status, causes and perspectives Per Kudsk Aarhus University Denmark

Occurrence and distribution of Chenopodium vulvaria L. in Košice city, Slovakia

Odontito-Ambrosietum Jarolímek et al a ruderal association new to Slovenia

Ca u c a l i d o-sc a n d i c e t u m (Li b b. 1930) R. Tx within t h e a r e a o f

Herbicide Effectiveness on Weeds in Mint

Long-term changes in the flora of the cereal ecosystem on the Sussex Downs, England, focusing on the years

Herbicide Effectiveness on Weeds in Tree Fruits

PHYTOCENOLOGICAL AND PHYTO GEOGRAPHICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE HOE WEED VEGETATION IN THE CONTINENTAL PART OF CROATIA

SEASONAL DYNAMIC OF WEED BIOMASS IN NARROW AND WIDE ROW SOYBEAN (GLYCINE MAX (L.) MERR.)

Impact of some technological indicators on weeding and yield in sunflower

STUDIA GEOBOTANICA A n i nter national J ournal

FUNCTIONAL DIVERSITY AND MOWING REGIME OF FLOWER STRIPS AS TOOLS TO SUPPORT POLLINATORS AND TO SUPPRESS WEEDS

Synanthropic vegetation: pattern of various disturbances on life history traits

Herbicide Effectiveness on Weeds in Wheat (West of the Cascades)

Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus, 16(1) 2017,

PURPOSE... i. Abbreviations... i. 1 Introduction Methods Compliance with Management Plans Results Discussion...

ORIGINAL PAPERS A PHYTOCENOLOGICAL STUDY ON THE ANTHROPIC VEGETATION IN THE BERZUNŢI MOUNTAINS AREA, BACĂU COUNTY. Irina Mădălina Ardei

Identifying faithful neighbours of rare plants in Britain; an application of the TPP dataset

Asplenium trichomanes ssp. quadrivalens Aubrieta deltoidea

St Mary s Churchyard, Potton

Phytosociological study of arable weed communities in Slovakia

Coyote Hills Wildflowers

Appendix A.8.21 Lackagh Quarry Petrifying Spring Survey Results

Presentation of the list of invasive plants in Bosna and Herzegovina. Doc. dr Zlatan Kovačević Doc. dr Siniša Mitrić Mr Biljana Vučković

KRYSTYNA WASYLIKOWA 1, MAGDALENA MĄCZYŃSKA 2, MAGDALENA RALSKA -JASIEWICZOWA 1, ZOFIA TOMCZYŃSKA 1, and ALDONA MUELLER-BIENIEK 1

Oikos. Appendix 1. Adult understory Seed bank. Nestedness [NODF] 30. Nurse age [years]

Competition for light causes plant biodiversity loss after eutrophication

SURVEY OF WEEDS IN MAIZE CROPS IN EUROPE

Steciana INTRODUCTION MATERIAL AND METHODS. 2014, Vol. 18(1): doi: /steciana

Weed diversity in Maize fields of Mastuj valley, Hindukush range, Pakistan

Volume VII Issue 1/2016 Pages INTERDISCIPLINARIA ARCHAEOLOGICA NATURAL SCIENCES IN ARCHAEOLOGY. homepage:

Weed Suppression by Buckwheat

Proceedings of the Meetings Comptes Redus de les Réunions

Varying diversity patterns of vascular plants, bryophytes, and lichens at different spatial scales in central European landscapes

SHORT COMMUNICATION EPIPHYTIC SURVIVAL OF PSEUDOMONAS VIRIDIFLAVA, CAUSAL AGENT OF PITH NECROSIS OF TOMATO, ON WEEDS IN TURKEY

Main Issues Report - Background Evidence 5. Site Analysis

Archaeobotanical reconstructions of field habitats and crops: the grange in Pomorzany near Kutno, 18 th /19 th c.

Monitoring of plant species along the Drava river and in Baranja (Croatia)

THLASPI ALLIACEUM (BRASSICACEAE) NATURALIZED IN GEORGIA, MISSOURI, AND NORTH CAROLINA

16 th Annual Invasive Species Workshop

S. S. Pazniak TRANSFORMATION OF CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF WEEDS

IS THE SPREAD OF NON-NATIVE PLANTS IN ALASKA ACCELERATING?

Alde-Ore Estuary Complex NVC 2013

Study 11.9 Invasive Plant Study

Appendix A.8.4 Galway City Transport Project Assessment of Annex I habitats in the Ballygarraun survey area (Perrin, 2014)

Seed mass, habitat and life history: a re-analysis of Salisbury (1942, 1974)

Shadow Cliffs Wildflowers

Ecological details of forming convergent corolla painting on example of flowering plants of Chişinău Irina Kolomiets

Appendix VI. Archaeobotany of the Late Neolithic site Vlaardingen, the Netherlands

On the Case: Investigating Alaska s Alien Invaders

ARCHIVES OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

Alien Species in the Flora of the Middle Volga Region

County Wildlife Action Plant List

Oikos. Appendix 1. Methods A1 OIK-03869

USING GRIME S MATHEMATICAL MODEL TO DEFINE ADAPTATION STRATEGY OF VASCULAR PLANTS IN THE NORTH OF RUSSIA

Appendix A.8.19 Habitat Survey Results - Species Lists

EFFECTS OF FISH HABITAT RESTORATION ACTIVITIES ON PLANT COMMUNITIES IN

Biodiversity Laboratory. Measuring Impacts on Soil Biodiversity in Agroecosystems

A revision of the Alopecurus pratensis - Sanguisorba officinalis (MG4) grassland community of the NVC 2014

The Effect of Water Stress on the Efficacy of Mesotrione to Control Weeds in Cool-season Turfgrass Stands

Provisional revision of the MG4 Alopecurus pratensis - Sanguisorba officinalis community Hilary Wallace and Mike Prosser

Plants and arthropods as bio-indicators in vineyard agroecosystem

ASSOCIATIONS OF THE MOLINIO ARRHENATHERETEA R. TX CLASS IN VASLUI RIVER BASIN IRINA BLAJ - IRIMIA. Introduction

Flower-Insect Timed Count: target flower guide

ACTA PHYTOGEOGRAPHICA SUECICA 73 EDIDIT J J

Dunbeacon Shingle SAC (site code: )

FLOWERS GROWING WILD IN BROADWAY

Formalised classification of the annual herb vegetation of wetlands (Isoëto- Nano-Juncetea class) in the Czech Republic and Slovakia (Central Europe)

Supporting Information

ASPECTS OF FLORISTIC DIVERSITY IN THE TOPOLOG COMMUNE (TULCEA COUNTY): I SEGETAL FLORA

Temescal Wildflowers. A photographic guide to showy wildflowers of Temescal Regional Recreation Area. Sorted by Flower Color

Karr J.R. and D.R. Dudley Ecological perspective on water quality goals. Environmental Manager 5:55-68.

Northwest Invasive Plant Council Land Owner Weed Removal Rebate

Assessment of phylogenetic signal in the germination ability of broomrape (Phelipanche ramosa) on Brassicaceae hosts

Limited evidence of local phylogenetic clustering in the urban flora of Brussels

Kennedy Grove Wildflowers

Ainsdale Hope School playing-field an ecological survey

CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE STUDY OF PALUDAL VEGETATION FROM THE NEAGRA ŞARULUI RIVER S BASIN (SUCEAVA COUNTY) LOREDANA ASOLTANI.

Laboratory of Geobotany and Plant Conservation, Department of Biosystematics, Opole University, Oleska 48, Opole, Poland

Mapping Phalaris minor under the Rice-Wheat Cropping System in Different Agro-Ecological Regions of Nepal

WEEDS OF WHEAT FIELDS AROUND MUZAFFARABAD, AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR

Economy and Environment of a Medieval Town Reflected in Wells Backfill in Písek, Bakaláře Square (South Bohemia, Czech Republic)

Weed vegetation of arable land in Central Europe: Gradients of diversity and species composition

Spontaneous vegetation in a possible green network in the West of Bucharest

Invasive Alien Vascular Plants in Bulgaria

UDK 63/66 ISSN HERBOLOGIA. An International Journal on Weed Research and Control

WEED CONTROL REGULATION 66/85

The Role of Spontaneous Succession in Reclamation of Mining Waste Tip in Area of Ruda Śląska City

Contents. 1. Introduction 3 2. Saltmarsh in Halton 4 3. Survey 5 4. Results 6 5. Conclusion 11

Catsear, Hypochoeris radicata A taprooted perennial with thistle-like flower. Leaf margin is not as deeply incised as Capeweed or Dandelion

Assessment of samples for plant remains from Silbury Hill

LANDSCAPE BOUNDARIES BELTS OR LINES? EXAMPLES FROM SOUTHERN AND NORTHERN POLAND

Big Break Wildflowers

Preface. May 14 th Ragnhild Elisabeth Heintz

Lamb Drove SUDS Showcase Project Cambourne Phase 1 Habitat Survey 2010

THE ASSOCIATION IN CLASS FESTUCO-BROMETEA Br.-Bl. et R. Tx. IN Br.-Bl FROM THE COVURLUI PLATEAU

COMPARISON OF DATA FROM TWO VEGETATION MONITORING METHODS IN SEMI-NATURAL GRASSLANDS

Biodiversity indicators for UK habitats: a process for determining species-weightings. Ed Rowe

Transcription:

ACTA AGROBOTANICA Vol. 63 (1): 235 257 2010 PLANT COMMUNITIES OF CULTIVATED FIELDS OF THE PODLASKI PRZEŁOM BUGU MESOREGION PART VI. COMMUNITIES OF ROOT CROPS ON COMPACT SOILS Zofia Rzymowska The Agricultural Ecology Department of the University of Podlasie in Siedlce, B. Prusa 14, 08-110 Siedlce, Poland, e-mail: ekorol@ap.siedlce.pl Received: 5.02.2010 Abstract Analysis of plant communities accompanying root crops on compact soils is presented in the paper. It is the next part of the review of plant communities of agrocenoses of the Podlaski Przełom Bugu (Podlasie Bug Gorge) mesoregion. The studied phytocoenoses were identified on the basis of 103 phytosociological relevés, made according to the Braun-Blanquet method. In the studied agrocenoses, plots of the associations Lamio-Veronicetum politae, Galinsogo-Setarietum and Oxalido-Chenopodietum polyspermi from the Polygono-Chenopodion polyspermi alliance were noted. Small patches of Lamio-Veronicetum and Oxalido-Chenopodietum were rarely noted in the studied area due to a small proportion of suitable habitats. In the area of Podlaski Przełom Bugu mesoregion, phytocoenoses of Oxalido-Chenopodietum developed in the river valleys on fertile muds and black soils. Typical plots of Galinsogo-Setarietum distinguishable by the mass occurrence of Galinsoga parviflora were only observed in the vicinity of farm buildings. Intermediate communities between Panico- Setarion and Polygono-Chenopodion polyspermi as well as phytocoenoces of Echinochloo-Setarietum typicum subvariant with Veronica persica and Echinochloo-Setarietum fumarietosum were also quite frequently noted in root crops on compact soils. Key words: cultivated fields, root crop communities, compact soils, Podlaski Przełom Bugu mesoregion INTRODUCTION The present paper is the next part of the review of plant communities of agrocenoses of the Podlaski Przełom Bugu mesoregion (S k r z y c z y ń s k a and R z y m o w s k a, 2005; R z y m o w s k a and S k r z y c z y ń s k a, 2006a; 2006b; 2006c; 2007). It concerns the analysis of communities developing in root crops on compact soils. The characteristics of the agrocenoses were made on the basis of 103 phytosociological relevés. The methodical principles, e.g., the list of localities with their numbering and the characteristics of the study area, were published in a paper by S k r z y c z y ń s k a and R z y m o w s k a (2005). RESULTS Systematics of the identified root crop communities: Class: Stellarietea mediae R. Tx., Lohm. et Prsg, 1950 Order: Polygono-Chenopodietalia (R. Tx. et Lohm. 1950) J. Tx. 1961 Alliance: Panico-Setarion Siss. 1946 1. Association: Echinochloo-Setarietum Krus. et Vlieg. (1939) 1940 Subassociation: Echinochloo-Setarietum typicum a. typical variant subvariant with Veronica persica b. variant with Mentha arvensis subvariant with Veronica persica Subassociation: Echinochloo-Setarietum fumarietosum a. typical variant b. variant with Stachys palustris 2. Intermediate community between Panico-Setarion and Polygono-Chenopodion polyspermi a. typical form b. form with participation of hygrophilous species Alliance: Polygono-Chenopodion Siss. 1946 3. Association: Lamio-Veronicetum politae Kornaś 1950 a. typical variant b. variant with Mentha arvensis 4. Association: Oxalido-Chenopodietum polyspermi Siss. 1950 5. Association: Galinsogo-Setarietum (R. Tx. et Beck. 1942) R. Tx. 1950

236 Zofia Rzymowska Phytocoenoses developing on compact soils in root crops in the area of the Podlaski Przełom Bugu mesoregion were diverse and floristically rich. The studied crops were dominated by fertile forms of Echinochloo-Setarietum (Panico-Setarion alliance) and communities from the Polygono-Chenopodion alliance: Lamio-Veronicetum politae, Oxalido-Chenopodietum polyspermi and Galinsogo-Setarietum. Echinochloo-Setarietum typicum Krus. et Vlieg. (1939) 1940 On compact soils, there were observed numerous plots of Echinochloo-Setarietum typicum - subvariant with Veronica persica and Echinochloo-Setarietum fumarietosum. Plots of Echinochloo-Setarietum typicum with Veronica persica were usually noted on good wheat and very good rye soil complexes, developed from clay, light and strong clayey sands. They were identified on the basis of 20 phytosociological relevés (Table 1). Apart from the plants characteristic for the association, a numerous group of species from the Polygono-Chenopodion alliance and Polygono-Chenopodietalia order was recorded, of which Veronica persica was the most frequently noted. The species such as Lamium purpureum, Veronica agrestis, Galinsoga ciliata, Sonchus asper and Euphorbia helioscopia were less frequently observed. Moreover, a large share of nitrophilous plants from the class Stellarietea mediae, e.g., Stellaria media, Chenopodium album and Matricaria maritima ssp. inodora, was characteristic for this subvariant. The variant with Mentha arvensis was distinguishable by the occurrence of species typical for excessively wet soil, e.g., Mentha arvensis, Gnaphalium uliginosum, Juncus bufonius, Stachys palustris, Potentilla anserina Plantago intermedia, Rorippa sylvestris. In total, 99 species were noted in the analysed phytocoenoses (68 in typical plots and 88 in the variant with Mentha arvensis). Number of species in one relevé varied, respectively, from 14 to 29 (on average 21) and from 19 to 40 (on average 28). Echinochloo-Setarietum fumarietosum On the soils of very good and good rye, good wheat and strong cereal-fodder complexes, plots of Echinochloo-Setarietum fumarietosum developed. The subassociation was described on the basis of 20 phytosociological relevés (Table 2). The phytocoenoses were observed both on optimally and excessively wet soils, which was the reason for the division of the subassociation into two variants: typical and variant with Stachys palustris. In the typical and moist plots of the subassociation, a constant and large proportion of Echinochloa crus-galli was observed. Raphanus raphanistrum was noted more rarely and less abundantly. A frequent occurrence of Fumaria officinalis was also characteristic for the subassociation. Other characteristic species of Polygono-Chenopodion (also distinguishable ones) were less frequently and abundantly noted, especially in the plots of the variant with Stachys palustris. They were as follows: Euphorbia helioscopia, Neslia paniculata, Sonchus asper, Lamium purpureum, Lamium amplexicaule, Veronica persica. In typical plots, a significant proportion of Galinsoga parviflora was observed. Moreover, in typical and moist plots, a mass occurrence of Chenopodium album and a slightly smaller proportion of Stellaria media were noted. The moist variant of the subassociation was distinguishable by a considerable share of hygrophilous species, e.g. Stachys palustris, Gnaphalium uliginosum, Mentha arvensis, Juncus bufonius, Rorippa sylvestris. In total, 113 species were noted in the analysed phytocoenoses (79 in typical plots and 93 in plots with Stachys palustris). Number of species in one relevé varied, respectively, from 15 to 38 (on average 26) and from 20 to 45 (on average 31). The intermediate community between Panico-Setarion and Polygono-Chenopodion polyspermi In root crops of the Podlaski Przełom Bugu mesoregion, intermediate phytocoenoses with the participation of species characteristic for the alliances Panico-Setarion and Polygono-Chenopodion polyspermi were also observed. Such plots were noted on various soil types, including rye (especially very good rye), wheat (especially good rye) and strong cereal-fodder complexes. The communities were identified on the basis of 20 phytosociological relevés (Table 3). In these phytocoenoses, a numerous group of species characteristic for the Polygono-Chenopodion alliance was noted. Among them, there was observed a high proportion of Euphorbia helioscopia, Sonchus asper, Veronica persica and Galinsoga parviflora as well as Veronica agrestis in the typical variant. The characteristic species for Panico-Setarion were recorded less frequently and with little cover. The only exception was Echinochloa crus-galli occurring abundantly, especially in plots rich in hygrophilous species. A considerable proportion of plants with high nutrient demands testify to high habitat fertility. Apart from the species from the Polygono-Chenopodion polyspermi alliance, the following were found: Chenopodium album, Stellaria media, Anagallis arvensis, Capsella bursa-pastoris, Galium aparine and Polygonum lapathifolium ssp. lapathifolium.

Plant communities of cultivated fields of the Podlaski Przełom Bugu mesoregion Part VI. Communities of root crops... 237 A form of community with the participation of hygrophilous species was identified on the basis of the occurrence of such species, as, Plantago intermedia, Gnaphalium uliginosum, Juncus bufonius, Ranunculus repens, Stachys palustris. In total, 103 species were noted in the analysed phytocoenoses (72 in typical form and 88 in plots with the participation of hygrophilous species). Number of species in one relevé varied, respectively, from 20 to 33 (on average 24) and from 26 to 45 (on average 34). Lamio-Veronicetum politae Kornaś 1950 Small plots of Lamio-Veronicetum politae were rarely observed, usually on soils of good and week wheat complexes and strong cereal-fodder complex. Diverse habitat conditions (especially soil moisture) are the reason for the division of the association into two variants: typical and variant with Mentha arvensis. The association was identified on the basis of 23 phytosociological relevés (13 typical variant and 10 moist variant) (Table 4). Typical plots of Lamio-Veronicetum politae developed in potato and beet crops, on typical brown and black soils and muds of wheat soil complexes. The following species characteristic for the association: Veronica polita, Euphorbia helioscopia, Veronica opaca, Lamium amplexicaule and Sonchus asper, were recorded. From among the species characteristic for the alliance, the most frequently and abundantly were noted the following: Veronica agrestis, Veronica persica, Lamium purpureum, Galinsoga parviflora and Lapsana communis. Stellaria media, Chenopodium album, Capsella bursa-pastoris, Anagallis arvensis and Galium aparine were also recorded frequently and with high cover. Plots with Mentha arvensis developed on clayey soils of good wheat and strong cereal-fodder soil complexes. These phytocoenoses were characterised by a high proportion of hygrophilous species, e.g. Mentha arvensis, Plantago intermedia, Stachys palustris, Potentilla anserina. The associations were floristically rich. In total, 100 species were noted in them (80 in typical variant and 83 in variant with Mentha arvensis). Number of species in one relevé varied, respectively, from 19 to 31 (on average 23) and from 23 to 39 (on average 30). Oxalido-Chenopodietum polyspermi Siss. 1950 Plots of the association Oxalido-Chenopodietum polyspermi were not frequently noted in root crops of the investigated area. They developed in beet and potato plantations, in the vicinity of watercourses. The association was usually observed on black soils and muds, classified as strong cereal-fodder complex. The association was distinguished on the basis of 10 phytosociological relevés (Table 5). The species characteristic for the association, Chenopodium polyspermum and Oxalis stricta, were a constant component of the phytocoenoses and had high cover. Numerous distinguishable plants, e.g. Plantago intermedia, Mentha arvensis, Galeopsis tetrahit and more rarely Symphytum officinale, were also recorded. Moreover, a numerous group of hygrophilous plants, e.g., Juncus bufonius, Gnaphalium uliginosum, Rorippa sylvestris, Polygonum amphibium, as well as other plants characteristic for Polygono- Chenopodion polyspermi occurring in constancy classes III and II were observed in these phytocoenoses (quite often with a high degree of cover). A high proportion of nitrophilous plants, e.g. Stellaria media, Chenopodium album and Matricaria maritima ssp. inodora, was also characteristic for these communities. Echinochloa crus-galli and less frequently other species from the Panico-Setarion alliance were also a constant component of these phytocoenoses. In total, the occurrence of 94 species was noted in the analysed plots of this association. Number of species in one relevé varied from 26 to 42 (on average 33). Galinsogo-Setarietum (R. Tx. et Beck. 1942) R. Tx. 1950 On various soils, classified as rye and wheat complexes, usually in the vicinity of farms, there were observed plots of the association Galinsogo- Setarietum. The phytocoenoses were dominated by Galinsoga parviflora, whereas Galinsoga ciliata and Setaria pumila were noted less abundantly (Table 6). The proportion of other species characteristic for Polygono-Chenopodion was much lower, of which the most frequent and numerous was Veronica persica. Species such as, e.g. Veronica agrestis, Lamium purpureum, Euphorbia helioscopia, Sonchus asper, used to reach a lower degree of cover. Plots of the phytocoenoses with a mass occurrence of Stellaria media and Chenopodium album were also noted. In spite of high weed cover, plots of Galinsogo-Setarietum were the floristically poorest phytocoenoses developing on compact soils of the study area. In total, 76 weed species were noted in them. Number of species in one relevé varied from 17 to 32 (on average 23).

238 Zofia Rzymowska Table 1. Echinochloo-Setarietum Krusem. et Vlieg. (1939) 1940 Subassociation typicum Variant typical with Mentha arvensis Subvariant with Veronica persica Relevé no. in table 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 1020 983 907 925 2214 2213 2165 427 2120 1040 Mean number of species per relevé 1016 1017 1027 906 1143 428 307 2030 2035 2132 Mean number of species per relevé Relevé no. in field Date: month 8 8 8 8 9 9 9 8 9 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 9 Year 96 96 96 96 94 94 94 95 97 96 96 96 96 96 96 95 95 97 97 97 Location 26 25 101 50 22 22 27 54 48 29 26 26 25 101 71 54 58 78 79 107 2Bw gl 2A pgm.gl 4A pgl.gl 4Bw pgl.gl 3A pgl.gc 2F pgm 2F pgm.płz 2Dz gl:glp 4F płz.pgl 5 Dz pglp:pl 2Bw gl 2Bw gl 4A pgl.gl 4A pgl.gl 4A pgl.glp 2Dz gl.glp 5Fpsp.płz 4A pgl.glp 3B gl 8D pgm.gl Soil unit Crop cover in % 75 90 z.n 65 z.n z.n z.n 80 70 z.n z.n z.n z.n 90 z.n 70 z.n z.n 80 z.n Weed cover in % 15 35 65 10 75 80 60 30 80 60 35 80 35 30 85 35 90 55 30 50 Number of weeds per relevé 19 25 20 14 19 19 19 24 17 29 21 32 22 26 25 34 39 40 19 24 22 28 I. Ch.Echinochloo-Setarietum S W S W Echinochloa crus-galli + 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 V 835 1 2 2 2 3 1 + 1 1 1 V 1160 Raphanus raphanistrum + 1 + + II 80 + + + + II 40 II. D. var. with Mentha arvensis Mentha arvensis + 1 + 1 1 1 + IV 230 Gnaphalium uliginosum + + 1 1 + 1 III 180 Juncus bufonius + 1 + 1 + 1 III 180 Stachys palustris 1 + + + 1 III 130 Potentilla anserina + I 10 1 1 + + + III 130 Plantago intermedia + + I 20 1 + + + + + III 100

Plant communities of cultivated fields of the Podlaski Przełom Bugu mesoregion Part VI. Communities of root crops... 239 cd. Table 1 Rorippa sylvestris + + 2 1 II 245 Ranunculus repens + I 10 + + + + II 40 Trifolium repens + + + + II 40 Bidens tripartita + + + II 30 Gypsophila muralis + + I 20 Sagina procumbens + + I 20 III. D. subvar. with Veronica persica Veronica persica 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 V 625 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 V 750 IV. Ch. Polygono-Chenopodion polyspermi, Polygono-Chenopodietalia Sonchus arvensis + + I 20 + + + + + + + IV 70 Veronica agrestis 1 + 1 II 110 1 + + + 1 1 III 180 Galinsoga ciliata + 1 1 1 II 160 + + + + + 1 III 100 Lamium purpureum + + + 1 1 III 130 + + 1 1 II 120 Sonchus asper 1 1 + 1 II 160 + I 10 Euphorbia helioscopia + I 10 + + + II 30 Polygonum lapathifolium ssp. pallidum V.Ch. Stellarietea mediae + + + II 30 Stellaria media + + 1 + 1 1 + 1 1 + V 300 1 + + + 1 1 1 + 1 + V 300 Chenopodium album + 1 3 + + 1 1 1 2 V 780 1 + 1 + + + 2 2 IV 490 Matricaria maritima ssp. inodora + 1 1 + + + + + IV 160 + 1 + 1 + 1 + IV 190 Fallopia convolvulus + + + + + + + IV 70 + + + + + + + IV 70 Capsella bursa-pastoris + 1 + + + + 2 + IV 285 + + + + + III 50 Myosotis arvensis + + + + + 1 + IV 110 + + + + II 40 Viola arvensis + + + + + III 50 + + + + II 40 Anagallis arvensis + + I 20 + + + + 1 III 90 Anthemis arvensis + + + + II 40 + + + + II 40

240 Zofia Rzymowska cd. Table 1 Polygonum aviculare + + + II 30 + + + + II 40 Vicia tetrasperma + + + II 30 + + + II 30 Thlaspi arvense + + I 20 + + + + II 40 Spergula arvensis + + + II 30 + + I 20 VI.Accompanying species Polygonum lapathifolium ssp. lapathifolium + + + + 1 III 90 1 1 + + + 1 + + IV 200 Cirsium arvense + + + + + + + IV 70 + 1 + + + III 90 Polygonum persicaria + + I 20 + + + + 1 + + IV 110 Equisetum arvense + + 1 + + + III 100 1 + + + + III 90 Veronica arvensis + + + + + + III 60 + + + + + III 50 Plantago major + + I 20 + + + + + III 50 Chamomilla suaveolens + I 10 + + + + + III 50 Galium aparine 1 + 2 1 II 285 + I 10 Agropyron repens + I 10 + 2 + II 195 Erysimum cheiranthoides + + + 1 II 80 1 1 + II 110 Taraxacum officinale + + + II 30 + + I 20 Amaranthus retroflexus + + + II 30 + + I 20 Convolvulus arvensis + + + II 30 + + I 20 Artemisia vulgaris + + + II 30 + I 10 Medicago lupulina + + + II 30 Sporadic species: II Polygonum amphibium 17(1), 18(+); Myosurus minimus14 (+); Spergularia rubra 15(+); Ranunculus sardous 16(+); Polygonum hydropiper 17(+); Riccia sp. 20(+); Anthoceros punctatus 20(+); IV Sonchus oleraceus 5(+), 9(+), 13(+), 19(+); Lapsana communis 5(+), 6(1), 7(2); Veronica polita 3(+), 14(+); Setaria pumila 15(+),18(+); Solanum nigrum 9(+); Oxalis stricta 16(+); Chenopodium polyspermum 17(+); V Sinapis arvensis 2(1), 6(+), 14(+), 20(+); Vicia hirsuta 2(+), 17(+), 19(+); Centaurea cyanus 3(+), 11(+), 18(+); Galeopsis tetrahit 9(+), 15(+), 17(+); Rumex crispus 8(+), 10(+), 16(+); Vicia angustifolia 10(+), 15(+), 18(+); Chamomilla recutita 4(+), 11(+), Geranium pusillum 10(+), 16(+); Consolida regalis 1(+); Crepis tectorum 2(+); Anchusa arvensis 8(+); Vicia villosa 10(+); Papaver rhoeas 14(+); Aethusa cynapium 16(+); Melandrium noctiflorum 17(+); VI Poa annua 2(+), 9(+), 14(+), 16(+); Erodium cicutarium 3(+), 10(+), 14(+), 17(+); Achillea millefolium 2(+), 8(+), 16(+); Sisymbrium officinale 5(+), 16(+), 19(+); Cardaminopsis arenosa 7(+), 17(+), 18(+); Arenaria serpyllifolia 7(+), 17(+); Galeopsis bifida 10(+), 15(+); Plantago lanceolata 10(r), 16(r); Melandrium album 17(+), 19(+); Rubus caesius 4(r); Urtica urens 5(+); Galium spurium 6(+); Malva neglecta 10(+); Poa pratensis 10(+); Cerastium holosteoides 16(+); Leontodon autumnalis 16(+); Malva sylvestris 17(+); Oenothera biennis 17(r); Lathyrus pratensis 18(r); Urtica dioica 19(r). Comments: numbers after species names inform about the relevé number in the table, z.n withered top leaves

Plant communities of cultivated fields of the Podlaski Przełom Bugu mesoregion Part VI. Communities of root crops... 241 Table 2. Echinochloo-Setarietum Krusem. et Vlieg. (1939) 1940 Subassociation fumarietosum Variant typical with Stachys palustris Relevé no. in table 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Relevé no. in field 2105 2099 1979 927 297 268 356 1131 1842 1840 1981 2067 442 1042 961 976 970 1081 1076 1091 Mean number of species per relevé Mean number of species per relevé Date: month 9 9 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 Year 97 97 97 96 95 95 95 96 97 97 97 97 95 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 Location 65 65 2 39 60 17 32 68 87 87 2 14 53 29 39 41 41 3 3 30 4Dz pgm.pgl:pl 5D pgl:pl 2B pgm.gl 4A glp:pl 5Bw pgl:gl 5F ps:pl 2D płz 5F płz.pl 5A pgl:gl 5A pgl:ps 3B gl 4F pgmp:pl 5F płz:pl 5Dz pgl:pl 4F płz.gsp:pl 8F pgmp 5F pglp.pl 8Bw pgmp 5F pglp 5F pglp Soil unit Crop cover in % z.n z.n z.n z.n z.n z.n z.n z.n z.n z.n z.n z.n 80 z.n z.n z.n z.n z.n z.n z.n Weed cover in % 55 90 85 60 85 60 75 70 80 50 55 50 40 65 75 60 50 95 95 90 Number of weeds per relevé 21 15 22 24 30 32 18 38 32 27 26 20 21 33 26 30 39 35 36 29 45 31 I. Ch. Echinochloo-Setarietum S W S W Echinochloa crus-galli 1 1 1 2 + 1 1 + 2 + V 630 + 1 1 + + 1 + 2 2 1 V 590 Raphanus raphanistrum 2 + + + + + III 225 + 1 1 2 1 III 335 II. D. Echinochloo-Setarietum fumarietosum Fumaria officinalis 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 V 625 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 + 2 + V 670 Euphorbia helioscopia + 1 + + II 80 + 1 I 60 Neslia paniculata + 1 + II 70 1 I 50 Sonchus asper + 1 + II 70 + + I 20 III. D. var. with Stachys palustris

242 Zofia Rzymowska cd. Table 2 Stachys palustris + I 10 2 + 1 + 1 + + IV 315 Gnaphalium uliginosum + I 10 + + + + + 1 1 + IV 160 Mentha arvensis + I 10 1 2 1 1 3 + III 710 Juncus bufonius + I 10 + + + + + 1 III 100 Rorippa sylvestris + + 2 II 195 Plantago intermedia 1 + + + II 80 Potentilla anserina + I 10 + 1 + II 70 Polygonum amphibium + + + + II 40 Sagina procumbens + + + + II 40 IV. Ch. D. Panico-Setarion Setaria viridis + 1 1 1 + + 1 IV 230 1 + + II 70 Setaria pumila + + 1 + + + III 100 + + I 20 Spergula arvensis + + I 20 + + + II 30 V. Ch.D. Polygono-Chenopodion polyspermi, Polygono-Chenopodietalia Chenopodium album 2 1 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 1 V 1700 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 V 1125 Galinsoga parviflora 2 4 1 2 1 2 + IV 1260 1 2 1 + + III 295 Stellaria media + 1 2 1 1 2 1 IV 560 + 1 1 + 1 1 1 IV 270 Lamium purpureum + + 1 1 + 1 III 180 1 I 50 Lamium amplexicaule + + + + + + III 60 + 1 I 60 Matricaria maritima ssp. inodora + I 10 + + + + + + III 60 Chenopodium polyspermum + I 10 1 1 + II 110 Sonchus arvensis + I 10 1 + 1 + II 120 Veronica persica + + 1 II 70 + + I 20

Plant communities of cultivated fields of the Podlaski Przełom Bugu mesoregion Part VI. Communities of root crops... 243 cd. Table 2 Geranium pusillum + + + II 30 + I 10 VI. Ch. Stellarietea mediae Myosotis arvensis + + + + 1 III 90 + + + + + + + + + V 90 Fallopia convolvulus 2 + + 1 + 1 + + IV 325 1 + + + + + + IV 110 Sinapis arvensis + + I 20 + + 3 1 + 2 III 630 Vicia tetrasperma + + + + + III 50 + + + + + + + IV 70 Capsella bursa-pastoris + + + + + III 50 + + 1 + + III 90 Viola arvensis + + + + + III 50 + + + + + III 50 Anthemis arvensis + + + + + III 50 + + + II 30 Vicia angustifolia + + + II 30 + + + + + + III 60 Galeopsis tetrahit + + + II 30 + + + + II 40 Centaurea cyanus + + + + + III 50 + + + + II 40 Vicia hirsuta + I 10 + + + + + III 50 Thlaspi arvense 1 + + 1 II 120 + + + + II 40 Polygonum aviculare + + + + II 40 + + + II 30 Anagallis arvensis + + + + II 40 + + I 20 Arabidopsis thaliana + + I 20 + + + II 30 Vicia villosa + + + II 30 Rumex crispus + + + + II 40 VII. Accompanying species Polygonum lapathifolium ssp. lapthifolium + + 2 + 1 1 III 305 + + + + + 3 1 1 IV 525 Veronica arvensis + + + + + II 50 + + + + + 1 + IV 110 Erysimum cheiranthoides + I 10 + + 1 + + 1 1 IV 190

244 Zofia Rzymowska cd. Table 2 Equisetum arvense 1 + + 1 + III 130 + + + + + + III 60 Artemisia vulgaris + + + + + 1 III 100 + + 1 + II 80 Galium aparine + + 1 + + 1 III 140 1 + + II 70 Convolvulus arvensis + + + + 1 2 III 265 + + + II 30 Cirsium arvense + + 1 + 1 III 130 + + + + II 40 Polygonum persicaria + + I 20 + + + + + + III 60 Plantago major + I 10 + + + + + III 50 Amaranthus retroflexus 1 1 + II 110 1 1 I 100 Erodium cicutarium + + + + II 40 + + + II 30 Taraxacum officinale + + + + II 40 + + I 20 Arenaria serpyllifolia + + + + II 40 + + I 20 Agropyron repens + + + + II 40 + + I 20 Melandrium album + + + + II 40 + + I 20 Galeopsis bifida + + + + II 40 Cardaminopsis arenosa + + + II 30 Linaria vulgaris + + + II 30 Cerastium holosteoides + + + II 30 Sporadic species: II Solanum nigrum 3(+), 6(+); III Ranunculus repens 13(1), 18(1); Gypsophila muralis 18(+), 20(+); Spergularia rubra 19(+); Veronica serpyllifolia 13(+); Anthoceros punctatus 13(+); IV Digitaria sanguinalis 6(+); V Veronica agrestis 8(+), 9(+); Atriplex patula 15(1); Lapsana communis 2(+); Veronica polita 9(1); Veronica opaca 9(+); Polygonum lapathifolium ssp. pallidum 13(+); Galinsoga ciliata 14(+); Symphytum officinale 18(+); VI Crepis tectorum 4(+), 9(+), 13(+); Anchusa arvensis 9(+), 10(+), 14(+); Conyza canadensis 6(+), 16(+); Melandrium noctiflorum 13(+), 15(1); Papaver argemone 16(+); Chaenorhinum minus 18(+), 20(1); Papaver dubium 20(+); Avena fatua 2(+); Stachys annua 9(1); Papaver rhoeas 10(+); Aethusa cynapium 13(+); Odontites serotina 16(+); VII Urtica urens 1(+), 13(+); Rumex confertus 2(+); Armoracia rusticana 5(+), 14(+); Malva pusilla 6(+), 9(+); Erigeron acris 7(+), 16(+); Glechoma hederacea 13(+), 17(+); Leontodon autumnalis 13(+); Plantago lanceolata 13(r); Sinapis alba 20(1); Trifolium arvense 1(+); Brassica rapa 3(+); Galium spurium 5(+); Herniaria hirsuta 6(+); Oenothera biennis 6(+); Chenopodium hybridum 9(+); Poa annua 13(+); Malva neglecta 14(+); Rumex obtusifolius 16(+); Elsholtzia ciliata 16(+). Comments: numbers after species names inform about the relevé number in the table, z.n withered top leaves

Plant communities of cultivated fields of the Podlaski Przełom Bugu mesoregion Part VI. Communities of root crops... 245 Table 3. Intermediate community between Panico-Setarion and Polygono-Chenopodion polyspermi Form typical with hygrophilous species Relevé no. in table 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Mean number of species per relevé Mean number of species per relevé Relevé no. in field 2082 1862 1021 1029 894 2131 2212 2034 2037 2009 1008 1096 1106 1105 1110 426 299 2039 2150 2154 Date: month 9 8 8 8 8 9 9 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 9 9 Year 97 97 96 96 96 97 94 97 97 97 96 96 96 96 96 95 95 97 94 94 Location 81 56 26 25 84 107 22 79 79 99 26 30 28 28 109 54 60 79 5 5 4D pgm.pl:gl 5Bw pglp. ps:pl 4A pgl.gl 2A pgm.gl 2Bw pgm.gs 5D psp:pl 2F pgmp 4A pgl.glp Soil unit 2B gl 2B pgm.gl:. gsp 4A pgl.gl 5Fpłz:pl 4A pgl.gl 8Dz pgm.gs 8A pgm.gs 2Dz gl:glp 6Dz psp:pl 3B gl 8F glp.pgl 8D pgmp:ps Crop cover in % z.n z.n z.n z.n 90 z.n z.n 85 80 z.n 80 z.n z.n z.n z.n z.n z.n z.n z.n 90 Weed cover in % 45 60 50 30 60 15 55 35 20 55 35 55 60 80 60 80 70 50 70 40 Number of weeds per relevé 30 21 28 33 20 20 24 20 21 22 24 32 36 35 44 37 45 26 26 27 28 34 S W S W I. Ch. Panico-Setarion Echinochloa crus-galli 1 1 1 1 1 + 1 1 1 2 V 585 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 V 1000 Setaria viridis + + + 1 II 80 + + + + 1 III 90 Setaria pumila + + II 20 + + + II 30 Raphanus raphanistrum + I 10 + + + + II 40 II. Ch. Polygono- Chenopodion polyspermi Euphorbia helioscopia + 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 IV 360 1 1 + + + + 1 1 1 + V 300 Sonchus asper 1 + + + 1 + + IV 150 + 1 1 1 1 1 + 1 1 V 370 Veronica agrestis + + + + 1 + + + 1 1 V 220 + + 1 + II 80 Veronica persica + + + 1 1 + 1 1 IV 240 + + + 1 + 1 1 2 IV 365 Galinsoga parviflora + 3 + 2 1 + 1 IV 680 + 1 1 3 1 + III 545

246 Zofia Rzymowska cd. Table 3 Sonchus oleraceus + + + II 30 + + + + + + + IV 70 Lamium purpureum + + + + 1 III 90 1 1 + 1 + III 170 Galinsoga ciliata 1 + 1 + 1 III 170 + 1 I 60 Veronica polita + 1 + + 1 III 130 + + + 1 1 III 130 Lamium amplexicaule + 1 + + + III 90 1 + I 60 Veronica opaca + + + II 30 + + I 20 III. D. form with hygrophilous species Plantago intermedia + I 10 1 + 1 1 1 + 1 + 1 V 330 Gnaphalium uliginosum + I 10 1 1 1 1 + 1 + IV 270 Juncus bufonius 1 + 1 1 + 1 III 220 Stachys palustris + I 10 + + 1 1 1 III 170 Ranunculus repens + + 3 1 II 445 Mentha arvensis + 1 + II 70 Polygonum amphibium + + I 20 IV. Ch.D. Polygono- Chenopodietalia Chenopodium album 1 1 2 1 + + + + 1 V 415 1 1 2 1 + 2 1 + + + V 590 Stellaria media + + 1 + + 1 + + 1 V 210 + 1 + 1 1 1 + + + V 250 Matricaria maritima ssp. inodora + 1 + 1 + + + + IV 160 + + + 1 + + III 100 Sonchus arvensis + + 1 + II 80 + 1 + + 1 + III 140 V. Ch. Stellarietea mediae Capsella bursa-pastoris + + + + II 40 + + + + + + 1 + + V 130 Fallopia convolvulus + 1 + + II 80 + + + + + + + IV 70 Anagallis arvensis + + + 1 + + III 100 + 1 + + 1 + III 140 Myosotis arvensis + + + + + III 50 + 1 + + + III 90 Thlaspi arvense + + + + II 40 + + + + + + III 60 Viola arvensis + + + II 30 + + + + + III 50

Plant communities of cultivated fields of the Podlaski Przełom Bugu mesoregion Part VI. Communities of root crops... 247 cd. Table 3 Sinapis arvensis + + + II 30 + 1 + II 70 Chaneorhinum minus 1 I 50 + 1 + II 70 Anthemis arvensis + + I 20 + + + II 30 Rumex crispus + + + + II 40 VI. Accompanying species Cirsium arvense + + + 1 + + III 100 1 + + + + 1 + + + V 170 Veronica arvensis + + + + + + III 60 + + + + + + + + + V 90 Galium aparine 1 + 1 + 1 + + IV 190 + + + 1 1 + III 140 Polygonum lapathifolium ssp. lapathifolium + + + 1 + III 90 + + + + 1 1 1 IV 190 Equisetum arvense 1 + + II 70 + + 1 + + + + IV 110 Erysimum cheiranthoides + + + II 30 1 1 + + + III 130 Erodium cicutarium + + + + + III 50 + + + II 30 Taraxacum officinale + + 1 II 70 + + + + + III 50 Polygonum persicaria + + I 20 + + + + + + III 60 Plantago major + + I 20 + + + + + III 50 Amaranthus retroflexus + + 2 1 II 245 1 1 1 II 150 Agropyron repens + 1 I 60 + + + 1 II 80 Convolvulus arvensis + 1 I 60 + + + II 30 Artemisia vulgaris + I 10 Symphytum officinale + 1 + II 70 Sporadic species: II Oxalis stricta 11(+), 16(+); Chenopodium polyspermum 1(+); Fumaria officinalis 15(+); III Bidens tripartita 14(+); Rorippa sylvestris 13(+), 14(+), 19(1); Potentilla anserina 12(+), 14(+), 20(+); Sagina procumbens 13(+), 14(+); Myosurus minimus 13(+), 14(+); Gypsophila muralis 14(+); Riccia sp. 14(+); Anthoceros punctatus 14(+); Equisetum sylvaticum 17(+); IV Polygonum lapathifolium ssp. pallidum 5(+), 9(+), 16(+); Solanum nigrum 7(+), 13(+), 16(+); Lapsana communis 1(+), 7(+); Geranium pusillum 10(+); Atriplex patula 20(+); V Vicia hirsuta 3(+), 4(+), 5(+), 14(+), 16(+); Vicia tetrasperma 4(+), 5(+), 13(+), 14(+), 15(+); Centaurea cyanus 1(+), 4(+), 15(+), 17(+); Vicia angustifolia 4(+), 5(+), 13(+), 16(+); Papaver rhoeas 1(2), 5(+), 16(+); Melandrium noctiflorum 1(+), 19(+), 20(+); Spergula arvensis 14(+), 15(+); Crepis tectorum 14(+), 15(1); Polygonum aviculare 4(+), 12(+); Galeopsis tetrahit 12(+), 14(+); Vicia villosa 1(+), 5(+); Avena fatua 1(1); Sisymbrium officinale 3(+); Galeopsis speciosa 10(+); Anchusa arvensis 10(+); VI Medicago lupulina 4(+), 5(+), 13(+), 14(+); Poa annua 6(+), 7(+), 11(+), 16(+); Galium spurium 7(+), 9(+), 19(+); Arenaria serpyllifolia 1(+), 20(+); Malva sylvestris 2(r), 10(+); Trifolium repens 11(+), 14(1); Galeopsis bifida 12(+), 15(+); Chamomilla suaveolens 12(+), 15(+); Malva neglecta 12(+), 17(+); Datura stramonium 2(r); Armoracia rusticana 2(1); Chenopodium hybridum 2(r); Trifolium arvense 3(+); Melandrium album 10(+); Neslia paniculata 11(+); Cardaminopsis arenosa 12(+); Plantago lanceolata 15(r); Leontodon autumnalis 15(+); Trifolium campestre 17(+); Tussilago farfara 19(+). Comments: numbers after species names inform about the relevé number in the table, z.n withered top leaves

248 Zofia Rzymowska Table 4. Lamio-Veronicetum politae Kornaś 1950 Subassociation typicum Variant typical Relevé no. in table 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 with Mentha arvensis 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Mean number of species per relevé Mean number of species per relevé Relevé no. in field 1884 1889 1868 1904 1853 2257 2010 1999 2206 2164 1901 1900 1890 1903 1905 1902 1869 999 904 2033 1984 1910 1909 Date: month 8 8 8 8 8 9 8 8 9 9 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 Year 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 94 94 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 96 96 97 97 97 97 Location 56 56 56 56 56 69 99 99 9 27 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 25 101 79 88 57 57 3Bw glp 3Bw glp Soil unit 3B gl 3B gl 5Bw pglp. psp:pl 4F płz 2B pgm.gl:. gsp 2B gl 2D pgm.gl 2F pgm.płz 2Bw gl:gs 3B gl 2Dd pgmp: glp 2B gl:gs 3B gl 2B gl:gs 3B gl 1D gl 4A pgl.gl 2B gl 2B gl.gs 8Dd glp 8Dd glp Crop cover in % zn zn 75 85 zn 90 90 80 zn 85 zn zn 75 zn zn 80 95 zn 80 90 85 zn zn Weed cover in % 45 20 80 20 40 40 30 25 30 50 100 75 45 55 40 50 30 40 30 50 15 20 45 Number of weeds per relevé 26 20 30 30 31 20 20 19 20 21 20 20 21 23 39 27 28 35 32 32 27 23 25 28 30 I. Ch. Lamio-Veronicetum politae S W S W Veronica polita 1 1 2 1 + + + + 1 1 + 1 1 V 442 1 1 + 1 + 1 + + + 1 V 300 Euphorbia helioscopia 1 1 + 1 1 1 + 1 1 1 IV 323 2 1 1 1 1 1 III 425 Veronica opaca + 1 + + + + 1 + + + IV 138 + + + 1 II 80 Lamium amplexicaule 1 1 2 1 1 1 + III 335 1 1 1 + 1 1 III 260 Sonchus asper + 1 1 1 1 II 161 + 1 1 + + III 130 II. D. with Mentha arvensis Mentha arvensis r I 0 + 1 + + + 1 2 IV 315 Plantago intermedia 1 + + + 1 + + IV 150 Stachys palustris + I 8 + 1 + + + 1 III 140 Potentilla anserina + I 8 + + + + 1 III 90 Gnaphalium uliginosum + + 1 II 70

Plant communities of cultivated fields of the Podlaski Przełom Bugu mesoregion Part VI. Communities of root crops... 249 cd. Table 4 Juncus bufonius + + + II 30 III. Ch. Polygono-Chenopodion polyspermi Veronica agrestis 2 1 1 + + + 1 1 2 + + + 2 V 604 2 + 2 1 + + 2 1 + 1 V 715 Veronica persica + + + + 1 + 2 + + + IV 235 + 1 + 1 + + III 140 Lamium purpureum 1 + + + 1 + + + 1 + + IV 177 1 + + 1 1 + III 180 Galinsoga parviflora 2 + + + 1 3 3 2 III 908 + + 1 + II 80 Lapsana communis 1 + 1 + + + + + IV 123 1 + 1 + II 120 Fumaria officinalis 1 1 1 1 II 154 1 + 1 1 II 160 Galinsoga ciliata + + + II 23 + 1 + II 70 IV. Ch. Panico-Setarion, Polygono-Chenopodietalia Stellaria media 2 1 1 + 1 + 1 1 + 2 1 + IV 531 1 1 + 1 + 2 + + 1 V 415 Chenopodium album + 1 + 1 + + + + 1 IV 162 + + + + 1 1 + + + V 170 Sonchus arvensis 2 + + + + 2 2 + III 442 1 + 1 + + + + + IV 160 Matricaria maritima ssp. 1 + 1 + II 92 + + 1 + + III 90 inodora Echinochloa crus-galli + + + + II 33 + + + II 30 VI. Ch.Stellarietea mediae Capsella bursa-pastoris + + 1 + + + + + + 1 IV 138 + + 1 + + + III 100 Anagallis arvensis + + + 1 + + + + IV 92 + + + + II 40 Myosotis arvensis + + + + + 1 III 77 + + + + + III 50 Viola arvensis + + + + + + + II 54 + + + + + + III 60 Vicia tetrasperma + + I 15 + + + + + III 50 Sinapis arvensis 1 + + II 54 + 1 + II 70 Melandrium noctiflorum + + 1 II 54 + + + + II 40 Fallopia convolvulus + + + + II 31 + + + + II 40 Thlaspi arvense + + + + II 31 + + + + II 40 Vicia hirsuta + + I 15 + + + + II 40 Centaurea cyanus + + I 15 + + + II 30

250 Zofia Rzymowska cd. Table 4 Anthemis arvensis + I 8 + + + II 30 VII. Accompanying species Galium aparine + + + + + 1 + + 1 1 + + V 185 + + + + + + + IV 70 Equisetum arvense + + + + + + III 46 + + + + + + + IV 70 Cirsium arvense + + 1 + + + + III 85 + + 1 + 1 + III 140 Convolvulus arvensis + + + 1 + + III 77 1 + + + II 80 Veronica arvensis + + + + II 31 + + + + + III 50 Polygonum lapathifolium ssp. lapathifolium + + I 15 + 1 + + + III 90 Polygonum persicaria + + I 15 + + + + + III 50 Agropyron repens + + I 15 + 2 2 1 II 410 Armoracia rusticana + 2 1 + II 188 + I 10 Arenaria serpyllifolia + + 1 II 54 + + + + II 40 Erysimum cheiranthoides 1 + + II 54 + + + II 30 Amaranthus retroflexus + 1 + II 54 + + I 20 Erodium cicutarium + + + II 23 + + I 20 Artemisia vulgaris 1 + I 46 + + + II 30 Neslia paniculata + 1 I 46 + + + II 30 Sinapis alba + + I 15 + + + II 30 Trifolium repens + + + + II 40 Tussilago farfara + + + II 30 Medicago lupulina + + + II 30 Sporadic species: I Raphanus raphanistrum 2(+), 3(+), 18(+); II Riccia sp. 14(+); Anthoceros punctatus 14(+), 21(+); Spergularia rubra 17(+); Rorippa syvestris 19(+), 22(+); Ranunculus repens 19(+); Hypericum humifusum 19(+); Sagina procumbens 20(+); III Chenopodium polyspermum 6(+), 20(1); Oxalis stricta 9(+); Sonchus oleraceus 23(+); IV Solanum nigrum 6(1), 17(+), 20(+); Setaria pumila 4(+), 23(+); Geranium pusillum 5(+); Atriplex patula 22(+); V Vicia angustifolia 1(+), 3(+), 18(+), 20(+); Aethusa cynapium 4(+), 9(+), 15(+); Papaver rhoeas 9(+), 17(+), 19(+); Anchusa arvensis 2(+), 5(+); Crepis tectorum 3(+), 19(+); Galeopsis speciosa 7(+), 18(+); Rumex crispus 10(+), 21(+); Polygonum aviculare 16(+), 22(+); Sisymbrium officinale 17(+), 20(+); Avena fatua 1(1); Papaver dubium 4(+); Arabidopsis thaliana 5(+); Chaenorhinum minus 6(+); Consolida regalis 9(+); Stachys annua 13(+); VI Plantago major 3(+), 5(+), 16(+), 18(+); Taraxacum officinale 4(+), 8(+), 17(+), 18(+); Campanula rapunculoides 1(+), 4(+), 15(+); Galium spurium 4(+), 5(+), 23(+); Melandrium album 5(+), 7(+), 23(+); Malva neglecta 1(+); Galeopsis bifida 2(+); Erigeron acris 5(+); Cerastium holosteoides 5(+); Senecio vulgaris 8(+); Cardaminopsis arenosa 10(+); Elsholtzia ciliata 11(+); Rubus caesius 12(+); Agrostis stolonifera 14(+); Trifolium arvense 18(+); Trifolium hybridum 20(+). Comments: numbers after species names inform about the relevé number in the table; z.n withered top leaves

Plant communities of cultivated fields of the Podlaski Przełom Bugu mesoregion Part VI. Communities of root crops... 251 Table 5. Oxalido-Chenopodietum polyspermi Siss. 1950 Relevé no. in table 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Relevé no. in field 2022 2023 2032 1055 959 1090 1102 1082 2137 1068 Date: month 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 9 8 Year 97 97 97 96 96 96 96 96 97 96 Location 78 78 78 52 40 30 30 3 107 3 Soil unit 8Dz pgl.glp 8Dz pgl.glp 8Dz pgl.glp 8F pgmp 5F płz:pl 8F pgmp 8F płz 8F pgmp 8Dz pgm:gl 8F pgmp Mean number of species per relevé Crop cover in % z.n z.n 80 z.n z.n z.n z.n z.n z.n z.n Weed cover in % 60 60 60 60 70 80 70 80 70 50 Number of weeds per relevé 32 26 28 34 37 42 29 33 29 36 33 I. Ch. D. Oxalido-Chenopodietum polyspermi S W Chenopodium polyspermum 1 2 1 1 1 + 1 1 2 1 V 710 Oxalis stricta 1 + 1 2 + 1 1 1 + V 455 Plantago intermedia + + + + + 1 1 + + V 170 Mentha arvensis + + 1 2 + + + 1 IV 325 Galeopsis tetrahit + + + 1 1 1 III 180 Stachys palustris + 1 1 1 II 160 Symphytum officinale + 1 + II 70 II. D. form with hygrophilous species Juncus bufonius 1 + + + 1 + + + 1 V 210 Gnaphalium uliginosum 1 1 2 + 1 + + IV 355 Rorippa sylvestris 1 + + + + III 90 Polygonum amphibium + 1 + + + III 90 Bidens tripartita 1 1 + II 110 Anthoceros punctatus + + + + II 40 Riccia sp. + + + + II 40 Sagina procumbens + + + + II 40 Gypsophila muralis + + + II 30 III. Ch. Polygono-Chenopodion polyspermi Galinsoga parviflora + + 1 2 1 1 III 345 Sonchus asper + 1 + 2 + III 255 Fumaria officinalis 1 1 1 II 150 Veronica persica 1 1 + II 110 Euphorbia helioscopia 1 + + II 70

252 Zofia Rzymowska cd. Table 5 Lamium purpureum + 1 + II 70 IV. Ch. D. Panico-Setarion, Polygono- Chenopodietalia Chenopodium album 1 1 1 1 + 2 2 1 1 V 660 Stellaria media + + 1 2 1 1 1 1 + 1 V 505 Echinochloa crus-galli + 1 + + + 1 1 + + V 210 Matricaria maritima ssp. inodora 2 2 2 + + + + + IV 575 Raphanus raphanistrum + 1 1 II 110 Sonchus arvensis + + + + II 40 V. Ch. Stellarietea mediae Myosotis arvensis 1 + + + + + + IV 110 Fallopia convolvulus + + + 1 + III 90 Vicia tetrasperma + + + + + III 50 Sinapis arvensis + 3 2 1 II 610 Chaenorhinum minus + 1 + + II 80 Viola arvensis + + + + II 40 Vicia hirsuta + + + + II 40 Capsella bursa-pastoris + + + + II 40 Anagallis arvensis + + + + II 40 Rumex crispus + + + II 30 Polygonum aviculare + + + II 30 VI. Accompanying species Erysimum cheiranthoides + + 1 + 1 1 1 + + V 250 Polygonum lapathifolium ssp. 1 1 + + + 1 2 + IV 365 lapathifolium Artemisia vulgaris 1 + + + + + + IV 110 Plantago major + + + + + + + IV 70 Galeopsis bifida + + 1 1 + + III 140 Polygonum persicaria + 1 + + + + III 100 Equisetum arvense 1 + + + + III 90 Veronica arvensis + + + + + + III 60 Galium aparine + + + + II 40 Cirsium arvense + + + + II 40 Trifolium repens + + + II 30 Cardaminopsis arenosa + + + II 30 Sporadic species: I Lapsana communis 9(+); II Polygonum hydropiper 1(1), 2(1); Potentilla anserina 5(1), 9(1); Myosurus minimus 4(+); Rorippa palustris 5(+); Ranunculus repens 5(+); Cerastium holosteoides 6(+); Spergularia rubra 9(+); III Veronica agrestis 3(+), 9(+); Veronica polita 9(1); Lamium amplexicaule 6(+); Sonchus oleraceus 7(+); IV Atriplex patula 5(1), 10(+); Setaria viridis 5(+), 6(+); Setaria pumila 6(+); Solanum nigrum 3(+); V Melandrium noctiflorum 3(+), 4(+); Thlaspi arvense 3(+), 6(+); Papaver argemone 4(+), 6(+); Anthemis arvensis 5(+); Vicia angustifolia 6(+), 10(+); Centaurea cyanus 6(+); Vicia villosa 6(+); Papaver dubium 6(+); Galeopsis speciosa 7(+); VI Arenaria serpyllifolia 1(+), 2(+); Sinapis alba 6(+), 10(+); Agropyron repens 6(+), 10(1); Amaranthus retroflexus 7(+), 9(2); Urtica urens 4(+); Lythrum salicaria 4(+); Glechoma hederacea 5(1); Linaria vulgaris 5(+); Plantago lanceolata 5(r); Erodium cicutarium 5(+); Medicago lupulina 5(+); Chamomilla suaveolens 7(+); Galium spurium 7(+); Malva neglecta 7(+); Convolvulus arvensis 9(+); Taraxacum officinale 9(+). Comments: numbers after species names inform about the relevé number in the table, z.n withered top leaves

Plant communities of cultivated fields of the Podlaski Przełom Bugu mesoregion Part VI. Communities of root crops... 253 Table 6 Galinsogo-Setarietum ( R.Tx. et Beck. 1942) R.Tx.1950 Subassociation typicum Variant typical Relevé no. in table 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Relevé no. in field 2134 2129 2205 982 1041 1893 1895 1865 1882 1857 Date: month 9 9 9 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 Year 97 97 94 96 96 97 97 97 97 97 Location 107 107 9 25 29 56 56 56 56 56 Soil unit 2Bw gl 4A pgm.gl 4A płz:gs 2Bw gl 5Dz pglp:pl 2Dd pgmp:glp 4Dd pgmp:ps 5Bw pglp.psp:pl 5Dd pglp:psp 5Bw pglp.psp:pl Mean number of species per relevé Crop cover in % 90 75 z.n 80 z.n z.n z.n z.n z.n z.n Weed cover in % 35 35 70 30 100 70 35 40 50 50 Number of weeds per relevé 26 20 20 17 28 23 20 19 32 24 23 S W I. Ch. D. Galinsogo-Setarietum Galinsoga parviflora 1 1 3 2 3 2 2 1 1 1 V 1525 Setaria pumila + + + 1 + 1 + IV 150 Galinsoga ciliata 1 2 1 + 1 + + IV 355 II. Ch. Polygono-Chenopodion Veronica persica 1 1 1 2 + 1 + + IV 405 Lamium purpureum + + + 1 + + 1 IV 150 Veronica polita + + + + + III 50 Euphorbia helioscopia 1 1 1 + + + III 180 Sonchus asper 1 1 1 II 150 Lamium amplexicaule + + 1 II 70 Veronica agrestis + + + 1 1 1 + IV 190 Sonchus oleraceus + + 1 + II 80 Fumaria officinalis + 1 1 II 110 III. Ch.D. Panico-Setarion, Polygono-Chenopodietalia Chenopodium album + + 1 + 3 1 1 1 + 1 V 665

254 Zofia Rzymowska cd. Table 6 Lapsana communis + + 1 II 70 Sonchus arvensis 1 + + II 70 Setaria viridis + + + + + 1 III 100 IV. Ch.Stellarietea mediae Stellaria media + 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 IV 735 Capsella bursa-pastoris + + + + + + + IV 70 Myosotis arvensis + + + + + III 50 Anagallis arvensis + + + + II 40 Fallopia convolvulus + + + + II 40 Anthemis arvensis + + + II 30 Vicia tetrasperma + + + II 30 Vicia hirsuta + + + II 30 V. Accompanying species Galium aparine 1 1 + II 110 Equisetum arvense + + + 1 + III 90 Erodium cicutarium + + + II 30 Convolvulus arvensis + 2 + + 1 III 255 Armoracia rusticana + 1 + II 70 Polygonum lapathifolium ssp. lapathifolium + 1 + II 70 Melandrium album + + + II 30 Erysimum cheiranthoides + 1 1 + 1 III 170 Cirsium arvense + + + + + 1 III 100 Artemisia vulgaris + + + 1 II 80 Polygonum persicaria + + + II 30 Agropyron repens + + + II 30 Amaranthus retroflexus + 1 1 II 110 Sporadic species: II Chenopodium polyspermum 1(1), 2(1); III Echinochloa crus-galli 2(+), 4(+); Raphanus raphanistrum 5(+), 10(+); Geranium pusillum 3(+); Polygonum lapathifolium ssp. pallidum 4(+); Matricaria maritima ssp. inodora 4(+); IV Papaver rhoeas 1(+), 4(+); Viola arvensis 1(+), 8(+); Anchusa arvensis 5(+), 9(+); Sinapis arvensis 1(+); Melandrium noctiflorum 5(+); Vicia villosa 5(+); Conyza canadensis 5(+); Polygonum aviculare 7(+); Arabidopsis thaliana 9(+); Thlaspi arvense 9(+); Vicia angustifolia 9(+); Avena fatua 9 (r); V Arenaria serpyllifolia 1(+), 3(+); Taraxacum officinale 3(+), 5(+); Veronica arvensis 3(+), 8(+); Medicago lupulina 4(+), 6(+); Galeopsis bifida 5(1), 10(+); Galium spurium 6(+), 9(+); Urtica urens 1(+); Leucanthemum vulgare 1(+); Tussilago farfara 1(+); Amaranthus hybridus 2(1); Trifolium repens 2(+); Poa annua 2(+); Rorippa sylvestris 2(+); Melilotus officinalis 4(+); Malva sylvestris 5(+); Malva neglecta 5(+); Potentilla anserina 5(+); Elsholzia ciliata 6(+); Mentha arvensis 10(+); Plantago major 10(+); Ballota nigra 10(r). Comments: numbers after species names inform about the relevé number in the table, z.n withered top leaves

Plant communities of cultivated fields of the Podlaski Przełom Bugu mesoregion Part VI. Communities of root crops... 255 DISCUSSION In root crops, on compact soils of the Podlaski Przełom Bugu mesoregion, there were observed plots of communities classified as Polygono-Chenopodion polyspermi. This calciphilous alliance is represented by: Lamio-Veronicetum politae, Oxalido-Chenopodietum polyspermi and Galinsogo-Setarietum. Little plots of these phytocoenoses were rarely observed in the investigated area. It is a result of a little proportion of wheat soil complexes, abundant in nutrients and CaCO 3, in that area. More often, plots of intermediate communities between Panico-Setarion and Polygono- Chenopodion polyspermi alliances as well as communities of the Panico-Setarion alliance are observed in root crops of the study area. The thermophilous and caliciphilous association Lamio-Veronicetum politae was usually noted on typical black and deluvial soils. These phytocoenoses are floristically rich, but poorer than similar associations reported in other regions of Poland, e.g. Kraków Jurassic area (K o r n a ś, 1950), Opole region (M i c h a l a k, 1972), Częstochowa Upland (W n u k, 1989). The most characteristic species: Veronica polita, Veronica agrestis and Veronica opaca, are considered to be rare in many regions of Poland (W a r c h o l i ń s k a, 1998; Szmeja, 1998; K o r c z y ń s k i, 1998). The first two mentioned species were relatively frequently noted in the Podlaski Przełom Bugu mesoregion, whereas Veronica opaca was more rarely observed. The identified phytocoenoses represent a northern Polish variety of the association, with a large proportion of Veronica agrestis and only a small participation of typical calciphilous species from the Caucalidion lappulae alliance (Wnuk, 1987). Only a few species from that group were recorded: Melandrium noctiflorum, Avena fatua, Aethusa cynapium. On the other hand, Veronica polita a species typical for the south-central Polish variant - was noted frequently and abundantly. Plots of Oxalido-Chenopodietum polyspermi were also rarely observed. Typical phytocoenoses of the association used to develop on fertile and wet alluvial soils along the large rivers (A n i o ł - K w i a t k o w s - k a, 1990; W ó j c i k, 1998, 2001; M a t u s z k i e - w i c z, 2001). In the area of the Podlaski Przełom Bugu mesoregion, the association was also noted on black soils in the Bug river valley and along its tributaries. The phytocoenoses are floristically rich (on average 33 species), richer than those investigated by W ó j c i k (1998) in the Przemyśl Foothills and W ę g r z y n e k (2006) in the Silesian Upland and poorer than the communities described by W ó j c i k (1980) from the middle Vistula river valley. The phytocoenoses recorded in the area of the Podlaski Przełom Bugu mesoregion are similar in floristic composition to the communities described by W ó j c i k (2001) from the Polish Lowlands. A little proportion of species characteristic for Panico-Setarion, with the exception of Echinochloa crus-galli, is characteristic for them. Symphytum officinale a distinguishable species for the association in the river valleys of the southern Poland was also recorded rarely (W ó j c i k, 2001). Typical plots of Galinsogo-Setarietum were noted only in the vicinity of farms in the area of the Podlaski Przełom Bugu mesoregion. They were floristically the poorest phytocoenoses on compact soils; however, cover weed was very high. These communites were species richer than these reported by W a r c h o l i ń s k a (1987) and A n i o ł - K w i a t k o w s k a (1990), but floristically poorer than the association distinguished in the Silesian Upland by W ę g r z y n e k (2006). Similarly as in other regions of Poland, Galinsoga parviflora was the dominant species in the studied phytocoenoses. Due to a large similarity of these phytocoenoses to Echinochloo-Setarietum, a group of authors question the phytosociological distinctiveness of the association, including it in the ruderal variant of Echinochloo-Setarietum (S i c i ń s k i, 2003). Intermediate plots between Panico-Setarion and Polygono-Chenopodion polyspermi were frequently observed in the area of the Podlaski Przełom Bugu mesoregion. These phytocoenoses were distinguishable by the mass occurrence of Echinochloa crus-galli and the presence of a group of species characteristic for the Polygono-Chenopodion polyspermi alliance, e.g. Euphorbia helioscopia, Sonchus asper, Veronica agrestis. Intermediate phytocoenoses developing in root crops were rarely described, e.g. by K o r n a ś (1950) from the Kraków Jurassic area, K o z a k (2002) from the W o ź n i k i - W i e l u ń Upland, S k r a j n a and S k r z y c z y ń s k a (2008) from the Kałuszyn Upland. Phytocoenoses of Echinochloo-Setarietum typicum subvariant with Veronica persica (Panico-Setarion alliance) with a large proportion of species characteristic for the Polygono-Chenopodion polyspermi alliance were also frequently noted. In floristic composition, they were similar to Echinochloo-Setarietum veronicetosum persicae described from the Przemyśl Foothills by Wójcik (1998), however they differ in the absence of neutro- and basophilous species characteristic for cereal associations (Lathyrus tuberosus, Avena fatua, Papaver rhoeas), and numerous occurrence of Lamium purpureum. REFERENCES A n i o ł - Kw i a t k o w s k a J., 1990. Zbiorowiska segetalne Wału Trzebnickiego. Florystyczno-ekologiczne studium porównawcze. / Segetal communities of the Trzebnica Moraine Belt. A floristic and ecological comparative study. Wyd. Univ. Wrocław. Prace Bot.: 46-230.

256 Zofia Rzymowska Korczyński M., 1998. Przemiany i stan flory segetalnej Bydgoszczy. / Bydgoszcz segetal flora changes and state. Acta Univ. Lodz., Folia Bot. 13: 65-72. K o r n a ś J., 1950. Zespoły roślinne Jury Krakowskiej. Cz. I. Zespoły pól uprawnych. / Plant associations of the Kraków Jurassic area. Part 1. Associations of cultivated fields. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 20 (2): 361-438. K o z a k M., 2002: Zbiorowiska segetalne gminy Rudnik (województwo opolskie). / Segetal communities of the gmina (commune) of Rudnik (Opolskie Voivodship (region). Fragm. Flor. Geobot. Polon. 9: 219-272. M a t u s z k i e w i c z W., 2001. Przewodnik do oznaczania zbiorowisk roślinnych Polski. Wyd. Nauk. Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warszawa: 1-537. M i c h a l a k S., 1972. Zbiorowiska polne Opola i okolicy. / Field communities of Opole and its surroundings. Opol. Rocz. Muz. 5: 309-320. R z y m o w s k a Z., S k r z y c z y ń s k a J., 2006 a. Zbiorowiska roślinne pól uprawnych Podlaskiego Przełomu Bugu. Cz. II. Zbiorowiska zbożowe. / Plant communities of cultivated fields of the Podlaski Przełom Bugu mesoregion. Part 2. Cereals communities. Acta Agrobot. 59 (2): 377-391. R z y m o w s k a Z., S k r z y c z y ń s k a J., 2006 b. Zbiorowiska roślinne pól uprawnych Podlaskiego Przełomu Bugu. Cz. III. Zbiorowiska ścierniskowe gleb piaskowych. / Plant communities of cultivated fields of the Podlaski Przełom Bugu mesoregion. Part 3. Stubble field communities on sandy soils. Acta Agrobot. 59 (2): 393-419. R z y m o w s k a Z., S k r z y c z y ń s k a J., 2006 c. Zbiorowiska roślinne pól uprawnych Podlaskiego Przełomu Bugu. Cz. IV. Zbiorowiska ścierniskowe gleb zwięzłych. Plant communities of the cultivated fields of the Podlaski Przełom Bugu mesoregion. Part 4. Stubble field communities of compact soils. Acta Agrobot. 59 (2): 421-440. R z y m o w s k a Z., S k r z y c z y ń s k a J., 2007. Plant communities of cultivated fields of the Podlaski Przełom Bugu mesoregion. Part 5. Root crop communities of light soils. Acta Agrobot. 60 (1): 191-205. Siciński J. T., 2003. Agrofitocenozy dorzecza środkowej Warty i Bzury stan, dynamika i zagrożenia. / Agrophytocoenoses of the middle Warta and Bzura rivers basin the state, dynamics and threats. Wyd. Uniw. Łódź.: 1-55. S k r a j n a T., S k r z y c z y ń s k a J., 2008. Plant communities and associations of root crops of the Kałuszyn Upland. Acta Agrobot. 61 (2): 239-249. S k r z y c z y ń s k a J., R z y m o w s k a Z., 2005. Zbiorowiska roślinne pól uprawnych Podlaskiego Przełomu Bugu. Cz. I. Zespoły zbożowe. / Plant communities of cultivated fields of the Podlaski Przełom Bugu mesoregion. Part 1. Cereal communities. Acta Agrobot. 58 (1): 255-290. S z m e j a K., 1998. Rzadkie i zagrożone wyginięciem chwasty upraw polnych Wzniesień Elbląskich, Doliny Dolnej Wisły i Równiny Charzykowskiej. / Rare and threatened weed species of field crops of the Elbląg Elevations, Lower Vistula valley and Charzykowy Plain. Acta Univ. Lodz., Folia Bot. 13: 37-42. Wa r c h o l i ń s k a A. U., 1987. Zbiorowiska segetalne Wzgórz Radomszczańskich. / Segetal communities of the Radomsko Hills. Bad. Fizjogr. Pol. Zach., Ser. B, 38: 123-153. Wa r c h o l i ń s k a A. U., 1998. Właściwości zagrożonych segetalnych roślin naczyniowych Polski. / Features of threatened segetal vascular plants in Poland. Acta Univ. Lodz., Folia Bot. 13: 7-14. Wę g r z y n e k B., 2006: Roślinność segetalna Wyżyny Śląskiej. Cz. V. Zbiorowiska chwastów upraw okopowych ze związku Eu-Polygono-Chenopodion polyspermi (Koch 1926) Siss. 1946. / Segetal vegetation of the Silesian Upland. Part V. Root crop weed communities of the Eu-Polygono-Chenopodion polyspermi (Koch 1946) Siss. 1946 alliance. Weed communities of maize crops. Natura Silesiae Superioris, Centrum Dziedzictwa Przyrody Górnego Śląska, 9 (2005): 63-83. W n u k Z., 1987. Zespół Lamio-Veronicetum politae Kornaś 1950 w Polsce. / The Lamio-Veronicetum politae Kornaś 1950 association in Poland. Zesz. Nauk. AR w Krakowie, 216 (19): 95-136. W n u k Z., 1989. Zbiorowiska segetalne Wyżyny Częstochowskiej na tle zbiorowisk segetalnych Polski. / Segetal communities of the Częstochowa Upland against the background of Poland`s segetal communities. Monogr. Bot. 71: 1-118. Wó j c i k Z., 1980. Plant communities of Mazovian cultivated fields. III. Root-crop communities. Pol. Ecol. Stud. 6 (3): 545-569. Wó j c i k Z., 1998. Zbiorowiska segetalne Pogórza Przemyskiego i jego najbliższego otoczenia. / Segetal communities of the Przemyśl Foothills and their immediate neighbourhood. Fragm. Flor. Geobot. Ser. Polonica, Kraków, 5: 117-164. Wó j c i k Z., 2001. Oxalido-Chenopodietum polyspermi Sissingh 1942 zespół chwastów upraw okopowych dolin rzecznych i pogórzy w Polsce. / The Oxalido-Chenopodietum polyspermi Sissingh 1942 association of root crop weeds in river valleys and foothills of Poland. Prace Geogr. 178: 87-117. Zbiorowiska roślinne pól uprawnych Podlaskiego Przełomu Bugu Cz. VI. Zbiorowiska upraw okopowych gleb zwięzłych Streszczenie Praca obejmuje analizę zbiorowisk upraw okopowych wykształcających się na glebach zwięzłych. Jest to kolejna część charakterystyki zbiorowisk Podlaskiego Przełomu Bugu. Badane fitocenozy