Since the logs have the same base, I can set the arguments equal and solve: x 2 30 = x x 2 x 30 = 0

Similar documents
5.6 Logarithmic and Exponential Equations

A factor times a logarithm can be re-written as the argument of the logarithm raised to the power of that factor

The trick is to multiply the numerator and denominator of the big fraction by the least common denominator of every little fraction.

Skill 6 Exponential and Logarithmic Functions

JUST THE MATHS UNIT NUMBER 1.4. ALGEBRA 4 (Logarithms) A.J.Hobson

MITOCW ocw f99-lec01_300k

If a function has an inverse then we can determine the input if we know the output. For example if the function

Logarithms and Exponentials

Exponential and Logarithmic Functions. By Lauren Bae and Yamini Ramadurai

Math 5a Reading Assignments for Sections

#29: Logarithm review May 16, 2009

YOU CAN BACK SUBSTITUTE TO ANY OF THE PREVIOUS EQUATIONS

MITOCW MITRES18_006F10_26_0501_300k-mp4

z = log loglog

Solving Multi-Step Linear Equations (page 3 and 4)

Solving Linear Inequalities: Introduction and Formatting (page 1 of 7)

2. Limits at Infinity

Lesson 6: Algebra. Chapter 2, Video 1: "Variables"

But, there is always a certain amount of mystery that hangs around it. People scratch their heads and can't figure

Algebra Exam. Solutions and Grading Guide

MITOCW MIT18_01SCF10Rec_24_300k

PROFESSOR: WELCOME BACK TO THE LAST LECTURE OF THE SEMESTER. PLANNING TO DO TODAY WAS FINISH THE BOOK. FINISH SECTION 6.5

Numerical Methods. Exponential and Logarithmic functions. Jaesung Lee

Module 3 Study Guide. GCF Method: Notice that a polynomial like 2x 2 8 xy+9 y 2 can't be factored by this method.

MITOCW watch?v=y6ma-zn4olk

Exponential and Logarithmic Functions

Skill 6 Exponential and Logarithmic Functions

Exponential and. Logarithmic Functions. Exponential Functions. Logarithmic Functions

Matrix Dimensions(orders)

Section 6.3: Exponential Equations and Inequalities, from College Algebra: Corrected Edition by Carl Stitz, Ph.D. and Jeff Zeager, Ph.D.

Algebra II Chapter 5: Polynomials and Polynomial Functions Part 1

Lesson 4b More on LOGARITHMS

Appendix A. Common Mathematical Operations in Chemistry

Exponential Functions:

6.3 logarithmic FUnCTIOnS

Instructor (Brad Osgood)

There are four irrational roots with approximate values of

4.4 Graphs of Logarithmic Functions

Algebra & Trig Review

MITOCW ocw f99-lec23_300k

MITOCW ocw f99-lec05_300k

If you have completed your extra credit opportunity, please place it on your inbox.

Module 2 Study Guide. The second module covers the following sections of the textbook: , 4.1, 4.2, 4.5, and

MITOCW MITRES18_006F10_26_0602_300k-mp4

Logarithmic Properties

MITOCW watch?v=vug2jncrxyg

IES Parque Lineal - 2º ESO

Big-oh stuff. You should know this definition by heart and be able to give it,

MITOCW ocw f07-lec39_300k

SUMMER REVIEW PACKET. Name:

Regression, part II. I. What does it all mean? A) Notice that so far all we ve done is math.

Example. Determine the inverse of the given function (if it exists). f(x) = 3

MITOCW MITRES18_005S10_DiffEqnsGrowth_300k_512kb-mp4

ACCESS TO SCIENCE, ENGINEERING AND AGRICULTURE: MATHEMATICS 1 MATH00030 SEMESTER / Functions

, p 1 < p 2 < < p l primes.

A. Incorrect! Check your algebra when you solved for volume. B. Incorrect! Check your algebra when you solved for volume.

MITOCW 2. Harmonic Oscillators with Damping

6: Polynomials and Polynomial Functions

We are going to start studying today, and for quite a while, the linear second-order differential equation with

Bridging the gap between GCSE and A level mathematics

2210 fall 2002 Exponential and log functions Positive Integer exponents Negative integer exponents Fractional exponents

MITOCW ocw f99-lec17_300k

Modern Algebra Prof. Manindra Agrawal Department of Computer Science and Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur

25 = 2. Remember to put the base lower than the g of log so you don t get confused 2. Write the log equation in exponential form 2.

4A: #1e-l,2-5,6g-l (Base 10 logs) 4B: #1-3last col,4,5,6 last col (Base a logs)

Logarithms Dr. Laura J. Pyzdrowski

MITOCW watch?v=4x0sggrxdii

MITOCW ocw f99-lec30_300k

MITOCW MITRES18_005S10_DiffEqnsMotion_300k_512kb-mp4

3.4 Exponential and Logarithmic Equations

Section 2.6 Solving Linear Inequalities

MITOCW ocw f99-lec09_300k

Mathematical Background. e x2. log k. a+b a + b. Carlos Moreno uwaterloo.ca EIT e π i 1 = 0.

Finding Limits Graphically and Numerically

ACCUPLACER MATH 0311 OR MATH 0120

Section 20: Arrow Diagrams on the Integers

Please bring the task to your first physics lesson and hand it to the teacher.

MITOCW MITRES_18-007_Part5_lec3_300k.mp4

MITOCW MITRES18_005S10_DerivOfSinXCosX_300k_512kb-mp4

MITOCW MITRES18_006F10_26_0601_300k-mp4

Logarithmic Functions and Their Graphs

STEP Support Programme. Hints and Partial Solutions for Assignment 1

When a function is defined by a fraction, the denominator of that fraction cannot be equal to zero

EQ: How do I convert between standard form and scientific notation?

Before we do that, I need to show you another way of writing an exponential. We all know 5² = 25. Another way of writing that is: log

SYDE 112, LECTURE 7: Integration by Parts

Activity 3.8 Logarithmic Functions

AQA Level 2 Further mathematics Further algebra. Section 4: Proof and sequences

Stephen F Austin. Exponents and Logarithms. chapter 3

Assignment 5 Name MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question.

Math 2 Variable Manipulation Part 1 Algebraic Equations

Goal: Simplify and solve exponential expressions and equations

Math 119 Main Points of Discussion

Finite Mathematics : A Business Approach

Exponents and Logarithms

7.3 Hyperbolic Functions Hyperbolic functions are similar to trigonometric functions, and have the following

The First Derivative Test

3.4 Solving Exponential and Logarithmic Equations

Polynomials and Rational Functions (2.1) The shape of the graph of a polynomial function is related to the degree of the polynomial

4. Find x, log 4 32 = x. 5. ln e ln ln e. 8. log log log 3 243

Transcription:

LOGARITHMIC EQUATIONS (LOGS) 1 Type 1: The first type of logarithmic equation has two logs, each having the same base, set equal to each other, and you solve by setting the insides (the "arguments") equal to each other. For example: Solve log2(x) = log2(14). Since the logarithms on either side of the equation have the same base ("2", in this case), then the only way these two logs can be equal is for their arguments to be equal. In other words, the log expressions being equal says that the arguments must be equal, so I have: x = 14 And that's the solution: x = 14 Solve logb(x 2 ) = logb(2x 1). Since the bases of the logs are the same (the unknown value "b", in this case), then the insides must be equal. That is: x 2 = 2x 1 Then I can solve the log equation by solving this quadratic equation: x 2 2x + 1 = 0 (x 1)(x 1) = 0 Then the solution is x = 1. Logarithms cannot have non-positive arguments, but quadratics and other equations can have negative solutions. So it is generally a good idea to check the solutions you get for log equations: logb(x 2 ) = logb(2x 1) logb([1] 2 )?=? logb(2[1] 1) logb(1)?=? logb(2 1) logb(1) = logb(1) The value of the base of the log is irrelevant here. Each log has the same base, each log ends up with the same argument, and that argument is a positive value, so the solution "checks". Solve logb(x 2 30) = logb(x). Since the logs have the same base, I can set the arguments equal and solve: x 2 30 = x x 2 x 30 = 0 (x 6)(x + 5) = 0 x = 6, 5 Copyright Elizabeth Stapel 2002-2011 All Rights Reserved Since I cannot have a negative inside a logarithm, the quadratic-equation solution "x = 5" cannot be a valid solution to the original logarithmic equation (in particular, this negative value won't work in the right-hand side of the original equation). The solution is x = 6. Solve 2logb(x) = logb(4) + logb(x 1). All of these logs have the same base, but I can't solve yet, because I don't yet have "log equals log". So first I'll have to apply log rules: 2logb(x) = logb(4) + logb(x 1) logb(x 2 ) = logb((4)(x 1)) logb(x 2 ) = logb(4x 4) Then: x 2 = 4x 4 x 2 4x + 4 = 0 (x 2)(x 2) = 0 The solution is x = 2.

2 Solve ln( e x ) = ln( e 3 ) + ln( e 5 ). Remember the definition of logarithms. Logarithms are powers. Specifically, "logb(a)" is the power that, when put on the base "b", gives you "a". In this case, the base of the log is e. The argument of "ln( e x )" is "e x ". That is, "ln( e x )" is "the power that, when put on e, gives you e x. Well, what power do you have to put on e to get e x? Why, x, of course! So ln( e x ) = x. Similarly, ln( e 3 ) = 3 and ln( e 5 ) = 5. So the given equation simplifies quite nicely: ln( e x ) = ln( e 3 ) + ln( e 5 ) x = 3 + 5 = 8 The solution is x = 8. Note: This could also have been solved using log rules: ln( e x ) = ln( e 3 ) + ln( e 5 ) ln( e x ) = ln(( e 3 )( e 5 )) ln( e x ) = ln( e 3 + 5 ) ln( e x ) = ln( e 8 ) Comparing the arguments: e x = e 8 x = 8 Type 2: The second type of log equation requires the use of The Relationship: y = b x...is equivalent to... (means the exact same thing as) logb(y) = x Note that the base in both the exponential form of the equation and the logarithmic form of the equation (above) is "b", but that the x and y switch sides when you switch between the two equations. If you can remember this that whatever had been the argument of the log becomes the "equals" and whatever had been the "equals" becomes the exponent in the exponential, and vice versa then you should not have too much trouble with solving log equations. Solve log2(x) = 4. Since this is "log equals a number", rather than "log equals log", I can solve by using The Relationship: log2(x) = 4 2 4 = x = 16 = x Solve log2(8) = x. I can solve this by converting the logarithmic statement into its equivalent exponential form, using The Relationship: log2(8) = x 2 x = 8 But 8 = 2 3, so: 2 x = 2 3 x = 3 Note that this could also have been solved by working directly from the definition of a logarithm: What power, when put on "2", would give you an 8? The power 3, of course! If you wanted to give yourself a lot of work, you could also do this one in your calculator, using the change-ofbase formula: log2(8) = ln(8) / ln(2) Plug this into your calculator, and you'll get "3" as your answer. While this change-of-base technique is not particularly useful in this case, you can see that it does work. (Try it on your calculator, if you haven't already, so you're sure you know which keys to punch, and in which order.) You will need this technique in later problems.

3 Solve log2(x) + log2(x 2) = 3 I can't do anything yet, because I don't yet have "log equals a number". So I'll need to use log rules to combine the two terms on the left-hand side of the equation: log2(x) + log2(x 2) = 3 log2((x)(x 2)) = 3 log2(x 2 2x) = 3 Then I'll use The Relationship to convert the log form to the corresponding exponential form, and then I'll solve the result: log2(x 2 2x) = 3 2 3 = x 2 2x 8 = x 2 2x 0 = x 2 2x 8 0 = (x 4)(x + 2) x = 4, 2 But if x = 2, then "log2(x)", from the original logarithmic equation, will have a negative number for its argument (as will the term "log2(x 2)"). Since logs cannot have zero or negative arguments, then the solution to the original equation cannot be x = 2. The solution is x = 4. Keep in mind that you can check your answers to any "solving" exercise by plugging those answers back into the original equation and checking that the solution "works": log2(x) + log2(x 2) = 3 log2(4) + log2(4 2)?=? 3 log2(4) + log2(2)?=? 3 Since the power that turns "2" into "4" is 2 and the power that turns "2" into "2" is "1", then we have: log2(4) + log2(2)?=? 3 log2(2 2 ) + log2(2 1 )?=? 3 2 + 1?=? 3 3 = 3 The solution checks. Copyright Solve log2(log2(x)) = 1. This may look overly-complicated, but it's just another log equation. To solve this, I'll need to apply The Relationship twice: log2(log2(x)) = 1 2 1 = log2(x) 2 = log2(x) x = 2 2 = 4 Then the solution is x = 4. Solve log2(x 2 ) = (log2(x)) 2. First, I'll write out the square on the right-hand side: log2(x 2 ) = (log2(x)) 2 log2(x 2 ) = (log2(x)) (log2(x)) Apply the log rule to move the "squared", from inside the log on the left-hand side of the equation, out in front of that log as a multiplier. Then I'll move that term to the right-hand side: 2log2(x) = [log2(x)] [log2(x)] 0 = [log2(x)] [log2(x)] 2log2(x) This may look bad, but it's nothing more than a factoring exercise at this point. So I'll factor, and then I'll solve the factors by using The Relationship: 0 = [log2(x)] [log2(x) 2] log2(x) = 0 or log2(x) 2 = 0 2 0 = x or log2(x) = 2 1 = x or 2 2 = x 1 = x or 4 = x The solution is x = 1, 4.

4 Type 3: The next level of this type of log equation may require a calculator to solve. An example would be: Solve ln(x) = 3. The base of the natural logarithm is the number "e" (with a value of about 2.7). To solve this, I'll use The Relationship, and I'll keep in mind that the base is "e": ln(x) = 3 e 3 = x This is a valid solution, and may be all that your books wants for the answer. However, if you need to graph this value or if this is the answer to a word problem, then a decimal approximation may be more useful. In that case, the answer is x = 20.086, rounded to three decimal places. Note that this decimal form is not "better" than "e 3 "; actually, "e 3 " is the exact, and therefore the more correct, answer. But whereas something like 2 3 can be simplified to a straight-forward 8, the irrational value of e 3 can only be approximated in the calculator. Make sure you know how to operate your calculator for finding this type of solution. Copyright Solve log2(x) = 4.5. First I'll convert the log equation to the corresponding exponential form, using The Relationship: log2(x) = 4.5 2 4.5 = x This requires a calculator for finding the approximate decimal value. The answer is x = 2 4.5 = 22.63, rounded to two decimal places. Solving this sort of equation usually works this way: You use The Relationship to convert the log equation into the corresponding exponential equation, and then you may or may not need to use your calculator to find an approximation of the exact form of the answer. By the way, when finding approximations with your calculator, don't round as you go along. Instead, do all the solving and simplification algebraically; then, at the end, do the decimal approximation as one (possibly long) set of commands in the calculator. Round-off error can get really big really fast with logs, and you don't want to lose points because you rounded too early and thus too much. Solve log2(3x) = 4.5. I'll use The Relationship, followed by some algebra: log2(3x) = 4.5 2 4.5 = 3x (2 4.5 ) 3 = x x = 7.54247233266... The answer is x = (2 4.5 ) / 3, or x = 7.54, rounded to two decimal places. If you try to check your solution by plugging "7.54" into the calculator for "x" in the original equation, you will get a result that is close to4.5, but not exact. This will be due to round-off error. Keep this round-off-error difficulty in mind when checking your solutions; when you plug the decimal into the original equation, just make sure that the result is close enough to be reasonable. For instance, to check the solution of the equation log2(3x) = 4.5, I'll plug 7.54 in for x: log2(3x) = 4.5 log2(3(7.54))?=? 4.5 log2(22.62)?=? 4.5 ln(22.62) ln(2)?=? 4.5 4.49952702422...?=? 4.5

Sample Questions: 1. If log4x = 3, then x =? 64 5 2. What is the value of log464? 3 C 3. Which of the following is a value of n that satisfies logn64 = 2? a. 4 b. 6 c. 8 d. 12 e. 32 What is the value of log2= 8? 3 4. What is the real value of x in the equation log224 log23 = log5x? 125 E C 5. If logax = n and logay = p, then loga(xy)2 =? a. np b. 2np c. 4np d. n + p e. 2(n + p) 6. Which of the following ranges of consecutive integers contains the value of the expression log9(9 7 3)? a. 0 and 1 b. 1 and 2 c. 2 and 3 d. 5 and 6 e. 7 and 8