Projections of 21st century Arctic sea ice loss. Alexandra Jahn University of Colorado Boulder

Similar documents
(1) Arctic Sea Ice Predictability,

Changing predictability characteristics of Arctic sea ice in a warming climate

The forcings and feedbacks of rapid Arctic sea ice loss

Is CESM the best Earth System Model? Reto Knutti Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science ETH Zurich, Switzerland

A Warming Arctic: Regional Drama with Global Consequences

Nonlinear atmospheric response to Arctic sea-ice loss under different sea ice scenarios

Ice sheet freshwater forcing

Changing Marine Access in the Arctic Ocean: The Arctic Climate Impact Assessment Panama Canal Authority 11 January 2005

Doing science with multi-model ensembles

Twenty-first-century projections of North Atlantic tropical storms from CMIP5 models

CLIMATE SIMULATIONS AND PROJECTIONS OVER RUSSIA AND THE ADJACENT SEAS: а CMIP5 Update

Can Arctic winter sea ice disappear abruptly?

Observed Arctic sea-ice loss directly follows anthropogenic CO 2 emission

Arctic sea ice prediction from days to centuries

Human influence on terrestrial precipitation trends revealed by dynamical

Sea ice thickness. Ed Blanchard-Wrigglesworth University of Washington

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Can Arctic sea ice decline drive a slow-down of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC)?

Constraining Model Predictions of Arctic Sea Ice With Observations. Chris Ander 27 April 2010 Atmos 6030

Supplemental Material

CMIP3/CMIP5 differences: Scenario (SRESA1B vs RCP4.5) Ensemble mean Tas responses: CMIP3 = 2.8 K CMIP5 = 1.9 K CMIP5 higher average resolution

IPCC Chapter 12: Long- term climate change: projections, commitments and irreversibility

Twenty-five winters of unexpected Eurasian cooling unlikely due to Arctic sea-ice loss

Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research, Met Office, FitzRoy Road, Exeter, EX1 3PB, UK.

Arctic sea ice in IPCC climate scenarios in view of the 2007 record low sea ice event A comment by Ralf Döscher, Michael Karcher and Frank Kauker

Errata. Version 11/07/2014 1

Contents of this file

Annual September Arctic Sea ice extent

Sea Ice Metrics in CMIP5

Arctic sea ice seasonal-to-decadal variability and long-term change

Climate Change in Colorado: Recent Trends, Future Projections and Impacts An Update to the Executive Summary of the 2014 Report

Cold months in a warming climate

Climate Models and Snow: Projections and Predictions, Decades to Days

Water Stress, Droughts under Changing Climate

Potential impact of initialization on decadal predictions as assessed for CMIP5 models

Quantifying the lead time required for a linear trend to emerge from. internal climate variability

Antigua and Barbuda. General Climate. Recent Climate Trends. UNDP Climate Change Country Profiles. Temperature

Cuba. General Climate. Recent Climate Trends. UNDP Climate Change Country Profiles. Temperature. C. McSweeney 1, M. New 1,2 and G.

Robust Arctic sea-ice influence on the frequent Eurasian cold winters in past decades

Arctic amplification: Does it impact the polar jet stream?

High-Resolution MPAS Simulations for Analysis of Climate Change Effects on Weather Extremes

Changes in Frequency of Extreme Wind Events in the Arctic

NSIDC Sea Ice Outlook Contribution, 31 May 2012

Climate Change Scenarios in Southern California. Robert J. Allen University of California, Riverside Department of Earth Sciences

The role of sea-ice in extended range prediction of atmosphere and ocean

Climate Projections and Energy Security

Evidence for Weakening of Indian Summer Monsoon and SA CORDEX Results from RegCM

Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis

How might extratropical storms change in the future? Len Shaffrey National Centre for Atmospheric Science University of Reading

Extreme, transient Moisture Transport in the high-latitude North Atlantic sector and Impacts on Sea-ice concentration:

SEA ICE PREDICTION NETWORK (SIPN) Template for Pan-Arctic Sea Ice Outlook Core Contributions August 2015 Report

Climate Risk Profile for Samoa

Supplementary Figure 1 Trends of annual mean maximum ocean mixed layer depth. Trends from uninitialized simulations (a) and assimilation simulation

Projected Impacts of Climate Change in Southern California and the Western U.S.

The Melting Arctic and Implications for Transport Infrastructure

1.Decadal prediction ( ) 2. Longer term (to 2100 and beyond)

Time of emergence of climate signals

Supplementary Materials

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Historical and Projected Future Climatic Trends in the Great Lakes Region

An Update on Snowpack Projections for Alaska: Chugach Results. Jeremy Littell, USGS Alaska Climate Science Center

Interpre'ng Model Results

Climate Change Scenarios Dr. Elaine Barrow Canadian Climate Impacts Scenarios (CCIS) Project

2. MULTIMODEL ASSESSMENT OF ANTHROPOGENIC INFLUENCE ON RECORD GLOBAL AND REGIONAL WARMTH DURING 2015

Challenges for Climate Science in the Arctic. Ralf Döscher Rossby Centre, SMHI, Sweden

arxiv: v3 [physics.ao-ph] 10 May 2017

Drylands face potential threat under 2 C global warming target

Early benefits of mitigation in risk of regional climate extremes

Arctic sea ice response to atmospheric forcings with varying levels of anthropogenic warming and climate variability

Ocean heat content and Earth s energy imbalance: insights from climate models

The ENSEMBLES Project

CGE TRAINING MATERIALS ON VULNERABILITY AND ADAPTATION ASSESSMENT. Climate change scenarios

Beyond IPCC plots. Ben Sanderson

Projected state of the Arctic Sea Ice and Permafrost by 2030

Correction notice. Nature Climate Change 2, (2012)

Possible Applications of Deep Neural Networks in Climate and Weather. David M. Hall Assistant Research Professor Dept. Computer Science, CU Boulder

Photo courtesy National Geographic

Advancements and Limitations in Understanding and Predicting Arctic Climate Change

Avoiding Gotchas in CMIP5 Data, Metadata, and Analysis

More extreme precipitation in the world s dry and wet regions

Validation of satellite derived snow cover data records with surface networks and m ulti-dataset inter-comparisons

Drought in a Warming Climate: Causes for Change

St Lucia. General Climate. Recent Climate Trends. UNDP Climate Change Country Profiles. Temperature. Precipitation

FUTURE PROJECTIONS OF PRECIPITATION CHARACTERISTICS IN ASIA

AMOC Impacts on Climate

Global warming and Extremes of Weather. Prof. Richard Allan, Department of Meteorology University of Reading

MULTI MODEL ENSEMBLE FOR ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON THE HYDROLOGY OF A SOUTH INDIAN RIVER BASIN

Internal Variability in Projections of Twenty-First-Century Arctic Sea Ice Loss: Role of the Large-Scale Atmospheric Circulation

Grenada. General Climate. Recent Climate Trends. UNDP Climate Change Country Profiles. Temperature. Precipitation

A New Approach to Predicting the Northern Hemisphere Sea Ice Extent

Trends in Climate Teleconnections and Effects on the Midwest

Detection and Attribution of Climate Change

Seasonal forecast skill of Arctic sea ice area in a dynamical forecast system

7. CMIP5 MODEL-BASED ASSESSMENT OF ANTHROPOGENIC INFLUENCE ON HIGHLY ANOMALOUS ARCTIC WARMTH DURING NOVEMBER DECEMBER 2016

Update on Climate Science. Professor Richard Betts, Met Office

CMIP5 multimodel ensemble projection of storm track change under global warming

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Physical systematic biases

Observing Arctic Sea Ice Change. Christian Haas

Climate change and variability -

Transcription:

Projections of 21st century Arctic sea ice loss Alexandra Jahn University of Colorado Boulder

Outline Sea ice projections/ensembles 101 How is Arctic sea ice projected to change in the 21 st century?

State Kinds of Predictability Of the First Kind: Initial value problem (e.g., weather, seasonal to decadal predictions) Predictability is lost after a certain time due to chaotic system behavior State Predictability of first kind Predictability of second kind Of the Second Kind: Boundary value problem Prediction of statistical properties of the climate system subject to some external forcing (e.g., climate projections (Adapted From Branstator and Teng, 2011) Time itial value, Forced & Total Predicta

Ensembles 101 2100 40 Different kinds of ensembles: Initial conditions ensembles Perturbed physics ensembles Multi-model ensembles (round of level perturbation to surface air temperature) Kay et al. (2015), BAMS CESM Large Ensemble F. 2. Global surface temperature anomaly (1961 90 base period) for the CESM Large ensembles (40): RCP8.5 (Kay et al., 2015, BAMS) CESM Medium ensemble (15): RCP4.5 (, Sanderson et al. 2015, J. Clim.) Other large ensembles exist (Canadian Model, GFDL, MPI, Hadley Center Model) CESM ensembles available at: https://www.earthsystemgrid.org/home.html

Sea ice projections 101 Ensemble mean: thick line, average of all models and many runs, reduces internal variability influence strongly BUT: We don t live in an ensemble mean world, we live in one realization, no reason to expect we get the ensemble mean

Ensemble mean versus individual runs Sept. sea ice extent [million km 2 ] Ensemble mean NSIDC observations Individual run

How is Arctic sea ice projected to change?

CMIP5 Arctic sea ice extent projections Large model spread and after ~2040 large impact of emission scenario à but all going down IPCC 2013

Projection uncertainty from different scenarios and internal variability: September sea ice extent Percent of uncertainty 100 80 60 40 20 Internal variability uncertainty Scenario uncertainty 0 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 Year Jahn, in prep Calculated following Hawkins and Sutton s (2009) uncertainty decomposition method, using CESM1.1.1 ensembles Until ~2045, internal variability uncertainty dominates the prediction uncertainty, after 2045 scenario uncertainty takes over à for the next decade, internal variability will make up >80% of projection uncertainty

September sea ice and global temperature (CMIP3) D06104 MAHLSTEIN AND KNUTTI: ARCTIC SEA ICE TO DISAPPEAR NEAR 2 C 2 C change in annual mean global surface temperature above present is the most likely global temperature threshold for September sea ice to disappear (in 30-yr mean) Mahlstein et al., 2012

September sea ice and CO 2 (CMIP5) 3 m 2 of sea ice area loss per 1 metric ton of CO 2 For the 30yr average sea ice, ice-free conditions are reached at additional 1000 Gt of CO 2 For current emissions of 35 Gt CO 2 per year, the limit of 1000 Gt will be reached before mid century. Notz and Stroeve 2016, Science

Annual mean Arctic sea ice loss per person by country Fig. S1: Annual mean loss of Arctic September sea-ice area caused by average emissions of each citizen. Emission data are for the year 2013 [37]. These data are converted to Arctic sea-ice loss based on the observed sensitivity of 3 m 2 Arctic September sea ice loss per ton of anthropogenic CO 2 emission. Notz and Stroeve 2016, Science

So, when could the Arctic first be ice-free (not the 30-yr mean)?

When could the Arctic first be ice-free? Influence of chaotic system on sea ice projections of the first occurrence of an ice-free Arctic in Sept in CESM LE Within one model and one scenario (RCP8.5), large (20+ year) projection uncertainty for first ice-free year due to internal variability Jahn et al., 2016, GRL

When could the Arctic first be ice-free? 5 models contributed ensembles of size 5 or larger to CMIP5 archive CMIP5 ensemble spreads for first reaching an ice-free Arctic range between 7-15 years, for ensembles of size 5-10 Jahn et al., 2016, GRL

CESM compared to CMIP5 ensembles: CESM LE bootstrapped Maximum ensemble spread Average ensemble spread CMIP5 ensemble spreads are consistent with statistical expectation from CESM LE for smaller ensemble sizes Minimum ensemble spread Jahn et al., 2016, GRL

When could the Arctic first be ice-free? Updated from Jahn et al. 2016, GRL Based on CESM, first ice-free Arctic could occur by 2035 also under lower emission scenarios (1.5 C OS, 2.0 C) due to enhanced variance at intermediate sea ice extents, but overall uncertainty increases due to added scenario uncertainty

Changing Variance of Sept. sea ice extent 3.5 3 sea ice extent variance 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ensemble mean ice extent Jahn, in prep Internal variability changes with the changing sea ice cover: Higher between 5-2 million km 2, lower for higher and smaller sea ice extent à has implications for predictability

Different levels of probability of an ice-free Arctic in the later 21 st century under different scenarios 1.5C 1.5C OS 2.0C RCP4.5 RCP8.5 (20 y running mean) An ice-free Arctic has a low probability for the 1.5C scenario (~1%), but it has a 100% probability for the RCP8.5, >70% for RCP4.5, ~35% for <2 degree warming Adapted from Sanderson et al., 2017 (Earth System Dynamics)

Regional ice-free projections a b c d e f g h i Laliberté et al., 2016, GRL

2050 2000 Projection of # of open water RE CLIMATE CHANGE days (CESM LE) Day of year 2100 DOI: 10.1038/NCLIMATE2848 0 Number of open water days per year b Shift in the Last first day of open water water relative to 1850 g j c e 2050 2000 1850 d Day of year 0 60 j 120 180 240 Days per year h Shift in the first day of open g 2000 60 e 120 No open water 180 2100 0 2050 water relative to 1850 d 120 180 LETTER 240 300 h 365 Shift in the last water relativ f 2100 a First day of open water 60 Days per year 300 365 k 0 60 120 180 i 240 300 365 Shift in theno last daywater of open open Year-round open water water relative to 1850 Figure f 1 Changes in the open water season in the CE open water season over the period 1850 2100. b,c, Th functions of latitude with variations due to patterns of water (right column) shift relative to 1850 values, resu 240 300 365 Year-round open water 180 More o linked to sea-ice loss in the past20,21. The shift in Daysof perfreeze-up year Days is larger than the shift in the first similar to trends in observational data sets5,22 an k 180 240 300 365 180 120 60l 0 0 60 60 120 increased heat stored in the surface ocean after No open water Year-roundBarnhard open water More water 2015 Less etopenal., water conditions. water season theme season in the CESM-LE. a,d,g,j,lengthens, The ensemble h Figure 1 Changes in the open wateras i the open decreases (Supplementary Fig. 9). In day 1850, th open water season over the period 1850 2100. b,c, The mean pre-industrial of yea 00 ure 1 Changes in the open water season in the CESM-LE. j n water season over the period 1850 2100. b,c, The mean g

Number of cargo and commercial cruise ships through NWP R. K. Headland and colleagues (2017) 5 4 3 2 1 0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Number of cargo ships through NSR http://www.arctic-lio.com/nsr_transits 80 60 40 20 0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Ships through Panama Canal: ~14,000 a year

Future shipping projections Geophysical Research Letters 10.1002/2016GL069315 September trans-arctic routes Under RCP8.5 the TSR is open for up 4-8 months of the year This can reduce average travel time to Asia from Europe with open water from 26 days to: 17 days by late century for RCP8.5 (22 days by late century for RCP2.6) For North America, reduction is from 25 days to 20-22 days for the NWP, but having to take the NSR or TSR can make it 24 days or more. Melia et al, 2016, GRL Ice strengthened Open water vessels Figure 2. Fastest available September trans-arctic routes from multimodel projections. Routes for RCP2.6 (a, c, and e) and RCP8.5 (b, d, and f) split into three periods (rows), each containing 15 consecutive Septembers, from five GCMs each with three ensemble members, equating to 225 simulations per panel. Cyan lines represent open water vessels (OW), and pink

Summary Arctic sea ice is projected to decrease over the 21 st century how much depends largely on future emissions In the next 1-2 decades, internal variability is more or as important and scenario differences for sea ice loss in a given year We can not predict the first year the Arctic will be ice-free with an uncertainty range of less than 20 years But the likelihood of an ice-free Arctic in the summer in the later half of the 21 st century increases the larger the warming is, with frequent ice-free Arctic summers likely for a warming of 2 C, infrequent for a 1.5C warming, and guaranteed ice-free multi-month periods under RCP8.5 (4C warming) Open water days will increase, opening up the Arctic for increased shipping, with the TSR passable for open-water vessels in the second half of the century under RCP8.5, and threating polar bear survival