Descriptive Statistics

Similar documents
General Linear Model

Prepared by: Prof. Dr Bahaman Abu Samah Department of Professional Development and Continuing Education Faculty of Educational Studies Universiti

General Linear Model. Notes Output Created Comments Input. 19-Dec :09:44

Multivariate Tests. Mauchly's Test of Sphericity

Repeated-Measures ANOVA in SPSS Correct data formatting for a repeated-measures ANOVA in SPSS involves having a single line of data for each

T. Mark Beasley One-Way Repeated Measures ANOVA handout

GLM Repeated-measures designs: One within-subjects factor

MANOVA is an extension of the univariate ANOVA as it involves more than one Dependent Variable (DV). The following are assumptions for using MANOVA:

ANOVA in SPSS. Hugo Quené. opleiding Taalwetenschap Universiteit Utrecht Trans 10, 3512 JK Utrecht.

Correlations. Notes. Output Created Comments 04-OCT :34:52

ANCOVA. Psy 420 Andrew Ainsworth

SPSS Guide For MMI 409

ANOVA Longitudinal Models for the Practice Effects Data: via GLM

Psy 420 Final Exam Fall 06 Ainsworth. Key Name

Stevens 2. Aufl. S Multivariate Tests c

GLM Repeated Measures

Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance

WITHIN-PARTICIPANT EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS

Three Factor Completely Randomized Design with One Continuous Factor: Using SPSS GLM UNIVARIATE R. C. Gardner Department of Psychology

One-Way ANOVA Source Table J - 1 SS B / J - 1 MS B /MS W. Pairwise Post-Hoc Comparisons of Means

More Accurately Analyze Complex Relationships

UV Absorbance by Fish Slime

N J SS W /df W N - 1

4:3 LEC - PLANNED COMPARISONS AND REGRESSION ANALYSES

same hypothesis Assumptions N = subjects K = groups df 1 = between (numerator) df 2 = within (denominator)

Chapter 14: Repeated-measures designs

Univariate Analysis of Variance

1 DV is normally distributed in the population for each level of the within-subjects factor 2 The population variances of the difference scores

Laboratory Topics 4 & 5

Research Design - - Topic 12 MRC Analysis and Two Factor Designs: Completely Randomized and Repeated Measures 2010 R.C. Gardner, Ph.D.

Appendix 1. The result of normality with Kolmogorov-Smirnov method and descriptive

Using the GLM Procedure in SPSS

Z score indicates how far a raw score deviates from the sample mean in SD units. score Mean % Lower Bound

Neuendorf MANOVA /MANCOVA. Model: X1 (Factor A) X2 (Factor B) X1 x X2 (Interaction) Y4. Like ANOVA/ANCOVA:

Neuendorf MANOVA /MANCOVA. Model: X1 (Factor A) X2 (Factor B) X1 x X2 (Interaction) Y4. Like ANOVA/ANCOVA:

Other hypotheses of interest (cont d)

M A N O V A. Multivariate ANOVA. Data

BIOL 458 BIOMETRY Lab 8 - Nested and Repeated Measures ANOVA

Analyses of Variance. Block 2b

Analysis of Variance: Repeated measures

Entering and recoding variables

unadjusted model for baseline cholesterol 22:31 Monday, April 19,

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE OF BALANCED DAIRY SCIENCE DATA USING SAS

H0: Tested by k-grp ANOVA

sphericity, 5-29, 5-32 residuals, 7-1 spread and level, 2-17 t test, 1-13 transformations, 2-15 violations, 1-19

MANOVA MANOVA,$/,,# ANOVA ##$%'*!# 1. $!;' *$,$!;' (''

Repeated Measures Part 2: Cartoon data

Biological Applications of ANOVA - Examples and Readings

Frequency Distribution Cross-Tabulation

Neuendorf MANOVA /MANCOVA. Model: MAIN EFFECTS: X1 (Factor A) X2 (Factor B) INTERACTIONS : X1 x X2 (A x B Interaction) Y4. Like ANOVA/ANCOVA:

Chapter 9. Multivariate and Within-cases Analysis. 9.1 Multivariate Analysis of Variance

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS. Repeated Measures and (M)ANOVA designs

SPSS Advanced Models 16.0

1998, Gregory Carey Repeated Measures ANOVA - 1. REPEATED MEASURES ANOVA (incomplete)

Repeated Measures ANOVA Multivariate ANOVA and Their Relationship to Linear Mixed Models

Applied Multivariate Statistical Modeling Prof. J. Maiti Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur

Multivariate analysis of variance and covariance

4.1 Computing section Example: Bivariate measurements on plants Post hoc analysis... 7

Statistics Lab One-way Within-Subject ANOVA

Analysis of Longitudinal Data: Comparison Between PROC GLM and PROC MIXED. Maribeth Johnson Medical College of Georgia Augusta, GA

Chapter 7 Factorial ANOVA: Two-way ANOVA

Covariance Structure Approach to Within-Cases

The entire data set consists of n = 32 widgets, 8 of which were made from each of q = 4 different materials.

Analysis of repeated measurements (KLMED8008)

SPSS Advanced Models 15.0

Introduction. Introduction

International Journal of Current Research in Biosciences and Plant Biology ISSN: Volume 2 Number 5 (May-2015) pp

Glossary. The ISI glossary of statistical terms provides definitions in a number of different languages:

Multiple Comparisons

An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis

Applied Multivariate Analysis

T-Test QUESTION T-TEST GROUPS = sex(1 2) /MISSING = ANALYSIS /VARIABLES = quiz1 quiz2 quiz3 quiz4 quiz5 final total /CRITERIA = CI(.95).

Stats fest Analysis of variance. Single factor ANOVA. Aims. Single factor ANOVA. Data

Degrees of freedom df=1. Limitations OR in SPSS LIM: Knowing σ and µ is unlikely in large

36-309/749 Experimental Design for Behavioral and Social Sciences. Dec 1, 2015 Lecture 11: Mixed Models (HLMs)

Chapter 5: Multivariate Analysis and Repeated Measures

ANOVA continued. Chapter 10

ANOVA approaches to Repeated Measures. repeated measures MANOVA (chapter 3)

Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) Lecture Notes

1 Introduction to Minitab

DETAILED CONTENTS PART I INTRODUCTION AND DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS. 1. Introduction to Statistics

(Same) and 2) students who

ESP 178 Applied Research Methods. 2/23: Quantitative Analysis

Topic 12. The Split-plot Design and its Relatives (continued) Repeated Measures

Analysis of Repeated Measures Data of Iraqi Awassi Lambs Using Mixed Model

Group comparison test for independent samples

ANOVA continued. Chapter 10

ANOVA continued. Chapter 11

Checking model assumptions with regression diagnostics

Review of Multiple Regression

Notes on Maxwell & Delaney

Linear Combinations. Comparison of treatment means. Bruce A Craig. Department of Statistics Purdue University. STAT 514 Topic 6 1

The SAS System 18:28 Saturday, March 10, Plot of Canonical Variables Identified by Cluster

Saya, selaku Ketua Paguyuban Lansia Gereja Katolik Kelahiran Santa. Perawan Maria Surabaya, menyatakan bahwa mahasiswa bernama Dewi Setiawati

Postgraduate course: Anova and Repeated measurements Day 2 (part 2) Mogens Erlandsen, Department of Biostatistics, Aarhus University, November 2010

Ch. 7. One sample hypothesis tests for µ and σ

Levene's Test of Equality of Error Variances a

Lec 1: An Introduction to ANOVA

STAT 5200 Handout #7a Contrasts & Post hoc Means Comparisons (Ch. 4-5)

Chapter 7, continued: MANOVA

Transcription:

*following creates z scores for the ydacl statedp traitdp and rads vars. *specifically adding the /SAVE subcommand to descriptives will create z. *scores for whatever variables are in the command. DESCRIPTIVES VARIABLES=ydacl statedp traitdp rads /SAVE /STATISTICS=MEAN STDDEV MIN MAX. Descriptives Descriptive Statistics ydacl statedp state ion traitdp trait ion rads reynolds adol scale Valid N (listwise) N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation 80.00.00 6.0775.0797.00.00.890.668 0.00.00.95.658 90.00.97.9897.580 70 *Following just runs descriptives on the resulting variables to check to. * be sure that we have ended up with variables with mean = 0 and sd =. DESCRIPTIVES VARIABLES=zydacl zstatedp ztraitdp zrads /STATISTICS=MEAN STDDEV MIN MAX skew kurt. Descriptives Descriptive Statistics Zydacl Zscore(ydacl) Zstatedp Zscore: state ion Ztraitdp Zscore: trait ion Zrads Zscore: reynolds adol scale Valid N (listwise) N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Skewness Kurtosis Statistic Statistic Statistic Statistic DStatistic i ti Statistic Std. Error Statistic Std. Error 80 -.559.79.0000000.0000000.896.066.00. -.077.650.0000000.0000000.88.067.96. 0 -.5.70.0000000.0000000.775.068.5.6 90 -.7087.05.0000000.0000000.55.068 -.06.6 70 *Following calculates the mean for the 6 items in question 5, provided that. *at least valid values are present. Page

compute socsup=mean.(q5a to q5f). *Following gives me a look at the resulting variable I asked for percentiles. *for 5 50 and 75 which I will use to construct four approximately equally sized. *groups for my social support variable. EXAMINE VARIABLES=socsup /PERCENTILES(5,50,75) /STATISTICS = descriptives /plot = none /MISSING LISTWISE /NOTOTAL. Explore Case Processing Summary socsup social support average Q5 w at least valid Cases Valid Missing Total N Percent N Percent N Percent 8 9.% 06 7.6% 89 00.0% Descriptives socsup social support average Q5 w at least valid Mean 95% Confidence Interval for Mean Lower Bound Upper Bound Statistic Std. Error.60.0767.5.97 5% Trimmed Mean Median Variance Std. Deviation Minimum Maximum Range Interquartile Range Skewness Kurtosis.5.667.00.678.00.00.00.8.65.068 -..7 Page

Percentiles Weighted Average(Definition ) Tukey's Hinges socsup social support average Q5 w at least valid socsup social support average Q5 w at least valid Percentiles 5 50 75.8.667.6667.8.667.6667 *First ran this syntax to create groups. *resulted in groups that were a little too unbalanced. *changed slightly and ran block of commands that follows. Do if socsup le.8. + compute socsupgp =. else if socsup le.66666. + compute socsupgp =. else if socsup le.666666. + compute socsupgp =. else if socsup gt.666666. + compute socsupgp =. end if. *This block created more nearly equal groups. Do if socsup le.8. + compute socsupgp =. else if socsup le.667. + compute socsupgp =. else if socsup le.6667. + compute socsupgp =. else if socsup gt.6667. + compute socsupgp =. end if. *runs frequencies to look at distribution across the groups. freq var = socsupgp. Frequencies Page

Statistics socsupgp social support group N Valid Missing 8 06 socsupgp social support group Valid Missing Total.00 highest support le.8.00 second highest le.667.00 second lowest le.6667.00 lowest support gt.6667 Total System Frequency Percent Valid Percent 66 6. 8.5 8.5 79 0..7 50. 58 5.8 7.9 78. 80 0..8 00.0 8 9. 00.0 06 7.6 89 00.0 Cumulative Percent *now label the new variables. Variable labels socsup 'social support average Q5 w at least valid' /socsupgp 'social support group'. Value labels socsupgp 'highest support le.8' 'second highest le.667' 'second lowest le.6667' 'lowest support gt.6667'. *runs the mixed analysis within subjects factor is the three different. * ion measures and the within factor is the four level social. * support group factor we just created. GLM zydacl ztraitdp zstatedp zrads BY socsupgp /WSFACTOR = /METHOD = SSTYPE() /POSTHOC = socsupgp ( SNK QREGW ) /PLOT = PROFILE( socsupgp ) /EMMEANS = TABLES() COMPARE ADJ(SIDAK) /EMMEANS = TABLES(socsupgp) COMPARE ADJ(SIDAK) /EMMEANS = TABLES(socsupgp*) Page

/PRINT = DESCRIPTIVE ETASQ /CRITERIA = ALPHA(.05) /WSDESIGN = /DESIGN = socsupgp. General Linear Model Within-Subjects Factors Dependent Variable Zydacl Ztraitdp Zstatedp Zrads Between-Subjects Factors socsupgp social support group.00.00.00.00 Value Label highest support le. 8 second highest le. 667 second lowest le. 6667 lowest support gt. 6667 N 6 7 5 7 Page 5

Descriptive Statistics Zydacl Zscore(ydacl) Ztraitdp Zscore: trait ion Zstatedp Zscore: state ion Zrads Zscore: reynolds adol scale socsupgp social.00 highest t support le.8.00 second highest le.667.00 second lowest le.6667.00 lowest support gt.6667 Total.00 highest support le.8.00 second highest le.667.00 second lowest le.6667.00 lowest support gt.6667 Total.00 highest support le.8.00 second highest le.667.00 second lowest le.6667.00 lowest support gt.6667 Total.00 highest support le.8.00 second highest le.667.00 second lowest le.6667.00 lowest support gt.6667 Total Mean Std. Deviation N -.850.786670 6 -.785085.85 7.07.95558 5.5997.700 7 -.007970.995755 59 -.56.70868 6 -.700.805907 7.09868.98966 5.70.0906 7 -.0.99555 59 -.509757.756055 6 -.95.86659 7.067.956096 5.686.06896 7 -.0697.00899 59 -.5956.7887689 6 -.75.8877 7.8760.888905 5.69807.00907 7 -.0087098.997685 59 Page 6

Effect * socsupgp a. Exact statistic Pillai's Trace Wilks' Lambda Hotelling's Trace Roy's Largest Root Pillai's Trace Wilks' Lambda Hotelling's Trace Roy's Largest Root Multivariate Tests c b. The statistic is an upper bound on F that yields a lower bound on the significance level. c. Design: Intercept+socsupgp Within Subjects Design: Partial Eta Value F Hypothesis df Error df Sig. Squared.000. a.000 5.000.95.000.000. a.000 5.000.95.000.000. a.000 5.000.95.000.000. a.000 5.000.95.000.00.7 9.000 765.000.000.00.970.95 9.000 09.6.000.00.0. 9.000 755.000.000.00.06 0.9 b.000 55.000.000.05 Mauchly's Test of Sphericity b Epsilon a Within Subjects Effect Mauchly's W Approx. Chi-Square df Sig. Greenhouse -Geisser Huynh-Feldt Lower-bound.70 9.55 5.000.89.8. Tests the null hypothesis that the error covariance matrix of the orthonormalized transformed dependent variables is proportional to an identity matrix. a. May be used to adjust the degrees of freedom for the averaged tests of significance. Corrected tests are displayed in the Tests of Within-Subjects Effects table. b. Design: Intercept+socsupgp Within Subjects Design: Page 7

Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Source * socsupgp Error() Sphericity Assumed Greenhouse-Geisser Huynh-Feldt Lower-bound Sphericity Assumed Greenhouse-Geisser Huynh-Feldt Lower-bound Sphericity Assumed Greenhouse-Geisser Huynh-Feldt Lower-bound Type III Sum Partial Eta of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Squared.6.0.6.9.000.6.56.05.6.890.000.6.67.05.6.89.000.6.000.6.6.688.000.99 9.660 6.6.000.05.99 7.67.08 6.6.000.05.99 7.00.09 6.6.000.05.99.000.980 6.6.000.05 98.959 765.6 98.959 08.70.9 98.959 095.580.7 98.959 55.000.78 Tests of Within-Subjects Contrasts Source * socsupgp Error() Linear Quadratic Cubic Linear Quadratic Cubic Linear Quadratic Cubic Type III Sum Partial Eta of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Squared.058.058.85.667.000.009.009.08.85.000.059.059.67.606.000 8.85.98 9.6.000.0.79.760.068.07.007.8.7 5.77.00.0 9.559 55. 0.79 55.8 78.608 55. Page 8

Tests of Between-Subjects Effects Transformed Variable: Average Source Intercept socsupgp Error Type III Sum Partial Eta of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Squared.96.96.97..00 95.6 08.9 5.5.000.0 09.56 55.6 Estimated Marginal Means. Estimates 95% Confidence Interval Mean Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound.07.06 -.05.069.0.05 -.05.07.08.06 -.0.068.00.05 -.00.079 Page 9

Pairwise Comparisons (I) (J) Based on estimated marginal means a. Adjustment for multiple comparisons: Sidak. Mean 95% Confidence Interval for Difference Difference a (I-J) Std. Error Sig. a Lower Bound Upper Bound -.006.0.000 -.068.055.000.0.000 -.059.058 -.0.0.997 -.077.05.006.0.000 -.055.068.006.06.999 -.07.09 -.006.06.999 -.07.05.000.0.000 -.058.059 -.006.06.999 -.09.07 -.0.09.990 -.06.09.0.0.997 -.05.077.006.06.999 -.05.07.0.09.990 -.09.06 Pillai's trace Wilks' lambda Hotelling's trace Roy's largest root Multivariate Tests Partial Eta Value F Hypothesis df Error df Sig. Squared.000. a.000 5.000.95.000.000. a.000 5.000.95.000.000. a.000 5.000.95.000.000. a.000 5.000.95.000 Each F tests the multivariate effect of. These tests are based on the linearly independent pairwise comparisons among the estimated marginal means. a. Exact statistic. social support group Page 0

Estimates social support group.00 highest support le.8.00 second highest le.667.00 second lowest le.6667.00 lowest support gt.6667 95% Confidence Interval Mean Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound -.5.0 -.59 -. -.7.08 -.66 -.079.098.0.06.8.676.08.58.769 Page

Pairwise Comparisons (I) social support group.00 highest support le.8.00 second highest le.667.00 second lowest le.6667.00 lowest support gt.6667 (J) social support group.00 second highest le.667.00 second lowest le.6667.00 lowest support gt.6667.00 highest support le.8.00 second lowest le.6667.00 lowest support gt.6667.00 highest support le.8.00 second highest le.667.00 lowest support gt.6667.00 highest support le.8.00 second highest le.667.00 second lowest le.6667 Based on estimated marginal means *. The mean difference is significant at the.05 level. a. Adjustment for multiple comparisons: Sidak. Mean 95% Confidence Interval for Difference Difference a (I-J) Std. Error Sig. a Lower Bound Upper Bound -.*.06.000 -.507 -.75 -.6*.059.000 -.767 -.57 -.89*.06.000 -.55 -.0.*.06.000.75.507 -.7*.06.000 -.8 -.0 -.88*.067.000 -.06 -.67.6*.059.000.57.767.7*.06.000.0.8 -.577*.06.000 -.7 -.0.89*.06.000.0.55.88*.067.000.67.06.577*.06.000.0.7 Page

Univariate Tests Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Partial Eta Squared Contrast.6 77. 5.5.000.0 Error 77.8 55.66 The F tests the effect of social support group. This test is based on the linearly independent pairwise comparisons among the estimated marginal means.. social support group * social support group.00 highest support le.8.00 second highest le.667.00 second lowest le.6667.00 lowest support gt.6667 95% Confidence Interval Mean Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound -.85.09 -.8 -.90 -.56.06 -.655 -.7 -.509.08 -.60 -.6 -.595.06 -.686 -.50 -.79.056 -.89 -.068 -.7.05 -.79 -.069 -..055 -. -.07 -..05 -.9 -.08.0.050 -.06...07.09.0..08.06.05.8.07.06..599.056.89.70.7.05.67.87.68.055.575.79.698.05.59.80 Post Hoc Tests socsupgp social support group Homogeneous Subsets Page

MEASURE_ Student-Newman-Keuls a,b Ryan-Einot-Gabriel- Welsch Range c,b social support group.00 highest support le.8.00 second highest le.667.00 second lowest le.6667.00 lowest support gt.6667 Sig..00 highest support le.8.00 second highest le.667.00 second lowest le.6667.00 lowest support gt.6667 Sig. Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. Based on Type III Sum of Squares The error term is Mean Square(Error) =.66. a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 08.9. b. Alpha =.05. Subset N 6 -.56 7 -.765 5.09855 7.67587 6 -.56.000.000.000.000 7 -.765 5.09855 7.67587.000.000.000.000 c. Critical values are not monotonic for these data. Substitutions have been made to ensure monotonicity. Type I error is therefore smaller. Profile Plots Page

Estimated Marginal Means of MEASURE_ 0.80000 0.60000 Estimated Marginal Means 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000-0.0000-0.0000-0.60000 highest support le.8 second highest le.667 second lowest le.6667 social support group lowest support gt.6667 Page 5