Coastline Changes in Mantanani Besar Island, Sabah, Malaysia

Similar documents
Mapping Coastal Change Using LiDAR and Multispectral Imagery

Erosion and Accretion Patterns along the Danish Shores

3.0 ROBERTS BANK TIDAL FLAT MORPHOLOGY

Map 4: Cowal Peninsula: Cluniter to Ardyne Point Map Content Descriptions

Modeling Coastal Change Using GIS Technology

Aim and objectives Components of vulnerability National Coastal Vulnerability Assessment 2

GIS 2010: Coastal Erosion in Mississippi Delta

Holocene evolution of Dahab coastline Gulf of Aqaba, Sinai Peninsula, Egypt 1

Monitoring Coastal Change after the Tsunami in Thailand

Integrating new coastline information and geographically coordinated coastal geomorphology data

The Use of Geographic Information Systems to Assess Change in Salt Marsh Ecosystems Under Rising Sea Level Scenarios.

Shoreline Changes during the last 60 years in Arecibo, Puerto Rico

Beaches Carrying Capacity Assessment in Kuwait Based on Photointerpretation and Ground Survey

Coastal Evolution in Sedimentary Areas in Greenland

GEOMORPHOLOGICAL FEATURES OF KUALA TERENGANU SPIT FROM IKONOS IMAGERY AND AERIAL PHOGRAPHS USING SEGMENTATION METHOD

PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND GIS TECHNOL 1 OGIES FOR MONITORING COASTAL EROSION ALONG DAR ES SALAAM COASTLINE. By: Z.Y Masele, S.D Mayunga1.

Coastal Systems and Landscapes 3 days

Margarita Stancheva Hristo Stanchev & Robert Young 2. MEDCOAST JUBILEE WORKSHOP May 2015, Iberotel Sarigerme Park, Dalaman, Turkey

Usage of remote sensing data for the identification of Shoreline evolution of the Holderness, UK

SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SURFACE CIRCULATION AND WAVE CLIMATE USING HIGH-FREQUENCY RADAR

Quantifying Coastal Evolution using Remote Sensing Approaches

Application #: TEXT

Notes and Summary pages:

Developed in Consultation with Florida Educators

Coastal Processes and Shoreline Erosion on the Oregon Coast, Cascade Head to Cape Kiwanda

2.2.7 Backbarrier flats

3 SHORELINE CLASSIFICATION METHODOLOGY

Holderness Erosion and Evolution of the Spurn Peninsula

Australian Coastal Councils Conference

MEMORANDUM FOR SWG

Draft exercise for share fair at Bozeman workshop only. This exercise is not ready for distribution. Please send helpful suggestions to

Summary Visualizations for Coastal Spatial Temporal Dynamics

GIS compilation of coastline variability spanning 60 years in the Mackenzie Delta and Tuktoyaktuk in the Beaufort Sea

NUMERICAL SIMULATION AS GUIDANCE IN MAKING TSUNAMI HAZARD MAP FOR LABUAN ISLAND

Erosion Information Paper - Barrow, Alaska Current as of September 14, 2007

Caspian Rapid Sea Level Changing Impact on Estuaries Morphodynamic Deformation

DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT TO STUDY CURRENT LONG-TERM EROSION RATES ADJACENT TO TERMINAL GROINS

SHORELINE AND BEACH PROCESSES: PART 2. Implications for Coastal Engineering

Use of Elevation Data in NOAA Coastal Mapping Shoreline Products. Coastal GeoTools April 1, 2015

Phillip Island Nature Parks Coastal Process Study 8 October 2014

Create your own map for tidepooling, beach field trips, boating, camping, kayaking, fishing, and exploring the beaches in Southcentral Alaska.

COASTLINE CHANGE MEASUREMENT AND GENERATING RISK MAP FOR THE COAST USING GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM


Landscape Systems: Coasts 3 days

Changes in Ecosystems - Natural Events

European Geosciences Union General Assembly Vienna, Austria 27 April - 02 May 2014

The Marine Environment

Chapter 17. Ocean and Coastal Processes

Mangrove Erosion in the Mekong delta

The environmental impact of marina development on adjacent beaches: a case study of the Herzliya marina, Israel

Name: Which rock layers appear to be most resistant to weathering? A) A, C, and E B) B and D

Ocean and Coastal Processes. Ocean Basins. Chapter 20. Ocean Basins and Plates. Ocean Terms. Sea Arch Bay-mouth Bar Spit Tombolo Coast.

Shoreline Evolution: City of Hampton, Virginia Chesapeake Bay, Back River, and Hampton River Shorelines

Design of Levee Breaches in Sheltered Water for Flood Risk Reduction & Marsh Restoration ASFMP; June 5, 2014 Presented By:

Shoreline Evolution: Lancaster County, Virginia Rappahannock River and Chesapeake Bay Shorelines

Active Coastal Processes in the Lubec Embayment

SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR OWEN ANCHORAGE AND COCKBURN SOUND SHORELINE MONITORING PLAN

The Marine Environment

Cliff stabilisation. Adaptation Option Climate-ADAPT

4. The map below shows a meandering stream. Points A, B, C, and D represent locations along the stream bottom.

Coastal Systems and Landscapes 3 days

Hurricanes and Storm Surge : Before coming to lab, visit the following web site:

Temporal and spatial scales of the features and processes forming the Polish Baltic Sea coast

HUMAN INTERVENTIONS AND ALTERATIONS OF THE GEOMORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS IN PARTS OF THE COASTAL AREA IN THE IONIAN COAST (IPIROS - GREECE)

Map 9: Ayrshire Coast: Stevenston Pier to Barassie Map Content Descriptions

A Detailed First Pass coastal hazard assessment for a long complex coast: Kingborough LGA, Tasmania

Oceanography. Oceanography is the study of the deep sea and shallow coastal oceans.

Supplemental Slides. Shore: Junction of Land & Water. Junction of Land & Water. Sea Level Variations. Shore vs. Coast. Sea Level Variations

Shore: Junction of Land & Water. Sediments come off land Most get dumped at the beach Sediment interacts with ocean waves and currents

Geol 117 Lecture 18 Beaches & Coastlines. I. Types of Coastlines A. Definition:

MONITORING AND MODELING NATURAL AND ANTHROPOGENIC TERRAIN CHANGE

GCSE 4242/02 GEOGRAPHY (Specification B) FOUNDATION TIER UNIT 2 SECTION B

Guided Reading Activity

The Coast: Beaches and Shoreline Processes

The Coast: Beaches and Shoreline Processes Trujillo & Thurman, Chapter 10

Beach Recovery Processes in Urban Beach Systems : A Study in Hong Kong after an Extreme Storm Event

Dunes Growth Estimation for Coastal Protection

Seaton to Seaton Hole SUMMARY OF PREFERRED PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS AND JUSTIFICATION

Regional-scale understanding of the geologic character and sand resources of the Atlantic inner continental shelf, Maine to Virginia

Evaluation of Storm Tide Measurements at Panama City Beach, FL

Shoreline Evolution: Richmond County, Virginia Rappahannock River Shorelines

Pilot service: Southern Emilia Romagna (Italy)

Monitoring Hurricane Rita Inland Storm Surge

QU: Where does sand do jail time? AIM: To explain the sediment cell concept as a system and what human and natural factors create/upset a dynamic

Effects of Sea Level Rise in Florida

CHAPTER 28. PHYSIOGRAPHY Cook Inlet Drainages

VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT OF EASTERN CRETAN BEACHES (GREECE) TO SEA LEVEL RISE

Map 2: Cowal Peninsula: Lazaretto Point to Dunoon Harbour North Map Content Descriptions

Geological record of severe storm impacts along the Texas Coast. Davin Wallace 1, John Anderson 1, Winnie Yu 1 and Antonio Rodriguez 2

Characterization of the Nigerian Shoreline using Publicly-Available Satellite Imagery

ANALYSIS OF URBAN PLANNING IN ISA TOWN USING GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS TECHNIQUES

CARTOGRAPHY OF COASTAL DYNAMICS: (CASE STUDY: COASTAL FRINGE FROM HAMMAM-LIF TO SOLYMAR BEACH -TUNISIA)

Cross Boundary Issues

1 Shoreline Landforms 2. 2 Emergent v. Submergent 2. 3 Wavecutting 3. 4 Planview 4. 5 Marine Terraces 5. 6 California 7. 7 Tombolos, Sea Stacks 8

A Quantitative Assessment of Human Interventions and Climate Change on the West African sediment budget

The University of Texas at Austin. Icebox Model Projections for Sea Level Fall in the Gulf Coast and Caribbean Sea Region

Geodetic & Geospatial Infrastructure/Systems

Detecting Landscape Changes in High Latitude Environments Using Landsat Trend Analysis: 2. Classification

SCIENCE OF TSUNAMI HAZARDS

GLY Coastal Geomorphology Notes

Transcription:

Transactions on Science and Technology, 3(2-2), 401-406, 2016 ISSN: 2289-8786 Coastline Changes in Mantanani Besar Island, Sabah, Malaysia Russel Felix Koiting*, Ejria Saleh, John Madin, Fazliana Mustajap Borneo Marine Research Institute, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, 88400 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, MALAYSIA. *Corresponding author. E-Mail: russel.felix.k@gmail.com; Tel: +6011-25298423: Fax: +088-320261 Received: 27 April 2016 Revised: 2 August 2016 Accepted: 1 September 2016 Online: 27 October 2016 Keywords: Coastline changes; beach erosion; accretion; Mantanani Besar Island ABSTRACT Coastline dominated by sandy beaches tends to change due to the processes of beach erosion and accretion. However, the coastline of an island is continuously changes due to direct exposure to physical forces from the sea and anthropogenic activities. At Mantanani Besar Island (west coast of Sabah), continuous beach erosion is among the major threats and a matter of concern by both islanders and tour operators. Therefore, this study aim at identifying the long-term coastline changes and the most dynamic coastline processes by detecting the pattern of beach modifications based on remote sensing images and photographs. The island was divided into four segments following the cardinal directions namely westward (seg 1), southward (seg 2), eastward (seg 3) and northward (seg 4). Aerial photos (1986, 1990, 2001 and 2013) and satellite image (2010) were analysed using ArcGIS Software Version 9.3. Results revealed that the island has undergone long-term coastline erosion (1986 to 2013) with the estimated total beach loss area of 168,113 m 2. All these segments experienced more beach erosion than accretion where seg 2 had the highest beach loss, approximately 71,590 m 2 followed by seg 4 (57,558 m 2 ), seg 1 (23,008 m 2 ) and seg 3 (15,957 m 2 ). The most dynamic areas were at seg 3 which had experienced more beach processes. Impacts from both natural phenomenon and anthropogenic activities lead to different rates of erosion at each segment. Further study on hydrodynamic forces (winds, waves and currents) at Mantanani Besar Island is recommended to better understand the coastal processes. Studies on hydrodynamics and beach changes would provide baseline data that might be helpful in planning measures for protecting the island from further erosion. Transactions on Science and Technology 2016 Introduction Mantanani Besar Island is among a cluster of three islands (others are Mantanani Kecil Island and Linggisan Island). It is the biggest of these three islands located on the west coast of Sabah. The island is important for both tourism and indigenous communities. Tourism program in Mantanani Besar Island has increased the number of tourist arrival to fourfold in the last three years (RCM, 2012). Bajau Ubian is the dominant ethnic community on this island. They have been living historically and using the available resources for their livelihood (Rosazman et al., 2015). The islanders have been experiencing beach erosion over the last few decades. This has affected both the community and the infrastructures that have been developed along the coastline. Koiting et al., 2016. Transactions on Science and Technology. 3(2-2), 401-406

Koiting et al., 2016. Transactions on Science and Technology. 3(2-2), 401-406 402 Studies on long-term coastline changes are time-consuming and become apparent only after a significant lapse of period (Gibeaut et al., 2001). The comparison between past years images is the best and quick method of detecting landscape changes over time (Rocchini & Rita, 2005). Objectives of this study were to detect coastline changes due to beach erosion and accretion using remote sensing time series data and to identify the most areas of the dynamic coastline at the Mantanani Besar Island. Methodology Study area The coastline of Mantanani Besar Island is characterized by sandy beaches and small rocky cliff at northwest area of the island. The entire man-made infrastructures including the two villages (Kg Padang and Kg Siring Bukit) and tourism facilities can be found along the coastline except at northern region while sandy spit formation was visible at the eastern most area of the island (Figure 1). Figure 1. Map of study area (Mantanani Besar Island) Method and measurement Datasets (aerial photos and satellite image of Mantanani Besar Island) were acquired from various sources. Aerial photo 2013 was used as a base layer consistent with the stipulation of Department of Survey and Mapping Malaysia which it shows the existence of all features in the real world as well as the removal of the image displacement (Nielsen, 2004). Tidal readings indicate that all maps were taken during low tide with estimated tidal ranges (TR) were less than 1 m (Table 1). Table 1. List of datasets Dataset Date Time Low tides Scale/Resolution Sources 15/3/1986 08:22 07:11 (TR: 0.51 m) 7/12/1990 09:15 09:33 (TR: 1.66 m) 6/4/2001 09:17 04:12 (TR: 0.94 m) 1:40, 000 Sabah Forest Management 1:40, 000 Sabah Lands and Surveys Department 1:25, 000 Department of Survey and Mapping Malaysia Satellite Image 27/2/2010 08:06 04:50 (TR: 0.94) 2.5 m Malaysian Remote Sensing Agency 8/2/2013-07:58 0.5 m Department of Survey and Mapping Malaysia

Koiting et al., 2016. Transactions on Science and Technology. 3(2-2), 401-406 403 Coastline of Mantanani Besar Island was divided into 4 segments (seg) to identify the areas with the occurrence of most beach changes and dynamic beaches during the 28 years of time interval (1986 to 2013). These segments were chosen based on the cardinal directions where seg 1 was along the west coast, seg 2 was in the southern part of the island, seg 3 in eastern areas and seg 4 was located along the northern part of the island (see Figure 1). Digital analysis of the coastline changes was carried out by ArcGIS Software Version 9.3. Ground Control Points (GCP) of each map were intermixed with hard and soft GCP and the coordinates were obtained from Google Earth. Scanned images were subjected to co-regristration that was achieved by georeferencing individual photos to the same base layer as followed by Hughes et al. (2006). The coastline was then digitized by creating polyline for each island. Layered colored polyline from different datasets enabled easy spotting on the difference coastline shapes. The beach changes (erosion and accretion) patterns and the changing values of each seg were revealed at each subtracting image overtime (1986 to 1990, 1990 to 2001, 2001 to 2010 and 2010 to 2013). Areas of changes, either erosion (E) or accretion (A), between the subtracting images were identified by creating a polygon at the changed areas and calculated by using the ArcGIS software. The projection systems used in ArcGIS Software was Timbalai 1948 RSO Borneo Meters. Negative (-) value of changes was considered as erosion while positive (+) value indicated accretion. The percentage of area changes (accretion minus erosion) in each segment were calculated based on the total area changes at all segments and the most dynamic area were based on the numbers of beach process occurrence (total numbers of erosion and accretion). Results and discussion Overlying remote sensing images shows that the coastline of Mantanani Besar Island is changing from 1986 to 2013. There is evidence of both beach erosion as well as accretion. Few noticeable changes occurred at the southwest and eastern part of the island especially at the spit area while no obvious changes were observed along the northwest (coastal cliff) of the island (Figure 2). Figure 2. Difference in the shape of coastline trends at Mantanani Besar Island for various years

Koiting et al., 2016. Transactions on Science and Technology. 3(2-2), 401-406 404 A total of 39 areas were identified that experienced beach changes throughout the 28 years. There were 22 eroded areas and 17 deposition areas. Total value of erosion exceeding accretion indicates that Mantanani Besar Island has been experiencing coastal erosion over the specific time period (Figure 3). According to Gibeaut et al., (2001), if an area has been experiencing erosion for the previous decades, then the erosion process will eventually resume even though particular beach may have been advancing or stable over the last several years. The concept can be ruled out if there is a permanent increase or decrease in the sand supply that has changed the system. Therefore, Mantanani Besar Island will undergo erosion along its coastline with the exception of area A17 that had experienced deposition for the past decade (A7, A11 and A17) (see Figure 3). The most dynamic seg with the highest occurrence of beach processes (erosion and accretion) were at seg 3 where 16 identified changes (eight erosion and eight accretion) were followed by seg 2 with 11 changes (five erosion and six accretion), seg 4 with 7 changes (six erosion and one accretion) and seg 1 with 6 changes (four erosion and two accretion) (see Figure 3). Figure 3. Identified areas with erosion (E) and accretion (A) trends at a) 1986 to 1990, b) 1990 to 2001, c) 2001 to 2010 and d) 2010 to 2013 The total erosion areas throughout the 28 years were estimated to be 168,113 m 2 (Table 2). Seg 2 has the highest beach loss estimated at 71,590 m 2 (43%) followed by seg 4 with 57,558 m 2 (34%), seg 1 with 23,008 m 2 (14%) and seg 3 with 15,957 m 2 (9%). Table 2. Erosion and accretion at each segment Segments Accretion (m 2 ) Erosion (m 2 ) Total area changes (m 2 ) Percentage of loss (%) 1 3,166-26,174-23,008 (Erosion) 14 2 21,084-92,674-71,590 (Erosion) 43 3 59,484-75,441-15,957 (Erosion) 9 4 766-58,324-57,558 (Erosion) 34 Total 84,500-252,613-168,113 (Erosion) 100%

Koiting et al., 2016. Transactions on Science and Technology. 3(2-2), 401-406 405 The percentage of erosion was different at each segment might be due to the different levels of energy impacts either from natural processes or anthropogenic activities along the shore. The presences of most of the residents both locals (Kg Padang with a portion of Kg Siring Bukit) and tourists (three resorts) with no barrier in front of the beach lead both anthropogenic activities and natural factors to be high in seg 2. In contrast seg 4, with no developments along the shoreline has minimal impact from anthropogenic activities but the exposure of open ocean forces is high due to absence of barrier. The two islands (Linggisan and Mantanani Kecil Island) located adjacent to seg 1 might reduce the impact from natural phenomenon to the beach and the presence of only one resort and village (portion of Kampung Siring Bukit) keep the anthropogenic factors low in seg 1. Seg 3 have experienced substantial erosion of >10 m 2 (E14, E15 and E21) while high sediment gain (>10 m 2 ) also occurred mainly at the spit (A4, A6, A10 and A16) (Figure 3). Conclusion Mantanani Besar Island is experiencing a long-term erosion which is expected to continue in the future. Beach erosion prominently occurs along most of the island with few areas of accretions that have been identified. The greatest beach loss occurred at seg 2 followed by seg 4, seg 1 and seg 3. Different levels of energy from natural phenomenon and anthropogenic activities lead to different rates of erosion at each segment. The most dynamic beach is at seg 3 (eight erosions and eight accretions) followed by seg 2 (five erosions and six accretions), segment 4 (six erosions and one accretion) and segment 1 (four erosions and two accretions). Studies on detailed hydrodynamic forces (winds, waves and currents) of Mantanani Besar Island should be done to get a better understanding of the environmental forces acting around the island. studies on the combined hydrodynamic and beach changes would be useful in providing a scientific basis for taking measures aimed at protecting the island from further erosion. Acknowledgements This project was funded by Department of Marine Park, Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, Malaysia under grant GL00102. We would like to thank Malaysian Remote Sensing Agency, Sabah Forest Management, Sabah Lands and Surveys Department and Department of survey and Mapping Malaysia for providing aerial photographs and satellite image. Mr. Mustapha Abdul Talip (CerGIS UMS) and Mr. Dunstan Anthony (NAHRIM) deserve appreciation for their help in the use of ArcGIS software. References [1] Gibeaut, J. C., Hepner, T., Waldinger, R., Andrews, J., Gutierrez, R., Trembley, T. A., Smyth, R. & Xu, L. (2001). Changes in Gulf Shoreline Position, Mustang and North Padre Islands, Texas. A Report of the Texas Coastal Coordination Council Pursuant to National Oceanic And Atmospheric. University of Texas. United States of America.

Koiting et al., 2016. Transactions on Science and Technology. 3(2-2), 401-406 406 [2] Hughes, M. L., McDowell, P. F. & Marcus, W. A. (2006). Accuracy Assessment of Georectified Aerial Potographs: Implications for Measuring Lateral Channel Movement in a GIS. Journal of Geomorphology. 74,1-16. [3] Nielsen, M. O. (2004). True orthophoto generation. Informatics and Mathematical Modelling. IMM- Thesis, Technical University of Denmark. Denmark. [4] Rocchini, D. & Di Rita, A. (2005). Relief effects on aerial photos geometric correction. Journal of Applied Geography, 25, 159-168. [5] Rosazman Hussin., Kunjumaran, V. & Weirowski, F. (2015). Work transformation from fisherman to homestay tourism entrepreneur: A study in Mantanani Island Kota Belud, Sabah, East Malaysia. Jurnal Kemanusiaan, 24,15-29.