Gain Delay Retune in Multivariable Controls for the Paper Making Process

Similar documents
We are IntechOpen, the world s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists. International authors and editors

Loop-Shaping Controller Design from Input-Output Data

How can a forming fabric reduce the energy consumption in the forming section Oliver Baumann, Stephan Ernst, Xerium Technologies

User-Friendly Robust MPC Tuning for Uncertain Paper-Making Processes

Chapter 1 Basic Characteristics of Control Systems and their Representation Process and Instrument Diagrams

Control-Oriented Approaches to Inventory Management in Semiconductor Manufacturing Supply Chains

3.1 Overview 3.2 Process and control-loop interactions

JOHNDEERE MOBILE WEATHER VALUE AND WALK AROUND GUIDE CLICK THE ARROW TO GET STARTED

System Identification for Process Control: Recent Experiences and a Personal Outlook

Multi-Input Multi-output (MIMO) Processes CBE495 LECTURE III CONTROL OF MULTI INPUT MULTI OUTPUT PROCESSES. Professor Dae Ryook Yang

Real-Time Feasibility of Nonlinear Predictive Control for Semi-batch Reactors

Release Liners: The Most Important Trash You ll Ever Buy. by Charles Sheeran

We quickly accept that different grades will probably require different settings for the coating chemistry to achieve the desired properties.

PROCESS CONTROL (IT62) SEMESTER: VI BRANCH: INSTRUMENTATION TECHNOLOGY

ON THE CORRELATION OF GROUND MOTION INDICES TO DAMAGE OF STRUCTURE MODELS

ik () uk () Today s menu Last lecture Some definitions Repeatability of sensing elements

CBE495 LECTURE IV MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROL

Optimizing Economic Performance using Model Predictive Control

A Holistic Approach to the Application of Model Predictive Control to Batch Reactors

LUMINOSITY LEVELLING TECHNIQUES FOR THE LHC

Overview of Control System Design

Process Unit Control System Design

The classifier. Theorem. where the min is over all possible classifiers. To calculate the Bayes classifier/bayes risk, we need to know

The classifier. Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) Example. Challenges for LDA

Raising intensity of the LHC beam in the SPS - longitudinal plane

COURSE MODULES LEVEL1.1

Introduction to linear programming using LEGO.

CHAPTER 10: STABILITY &TUNING

Modeling and Simulation of Wet-end White Water System in the Paper Mill

Principles and Practice of Automatic Process Control

Maple in Differential Equations

Transient Stability Analysis with PowerWorld Simulator

Axial length impact on high-speed centrifugal compressor flow

11.1 Power System Stability Overview

CONTROLLER PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT IN SET POINT TRACKING AND REGULATORY CONTROL

Analyzing Control Problems and Improving Control Loop Performance

EXCITATION CONTROL OF SYNCHRONOUS GENERATOR USING A FUZZY LOGIC BASED BACKSTEPPING APPROACH

CSC321 Lecture 2: Linear Regression

Wannabe-MPC for Large Systems Based on Multiple Iterative PI Controllers

A Computer Application for Power System Control Studies

NonlinearControlofpHSystemforChangeOverTitrationCurve

Ultrasonic testing of paper: how it relates to mechanical properties and tissue softness

Unit OperatiOn. Table 1: List of some unit operations

Secured Busbar Differential Protection Using A Computationally Efficient Dot Product Technique

Low Inductance Ceramic Capacitor (LICC)

Dynamic Modeling, Simulation and Control of MIMO Systems

Topic 8: Optimal Investment

SYMBIOSIS CENTRE FOR DISTANCE LEARNING (SCDL) Subject: production and operations management

The New Normal or Was It?

S-882Z Series ULTRA-LOW VOLTAGE OPERATION CHARGE PUMP IC FOR STEP-UP DC-DC CONVERTER STARTUP. Rev.1.2_00. Features. Applications.

Subject: Introduction to Process Control. Week 01, Lectures 01 02, Spring Content

Identification of ARX, OE, FIR models with the least squares method

CHAPTER 3 TUNING METHODS OF CONTROLLER

CHAPTER 5 ROBUSTNESS ANALYSIS OF THE CONTROLLER

TURBULENT FLOW IN A HYDRAULIC HEADBOX

Optimal Implementation of On-Line Optimization

Chapter 9: Transient Stability

Dynamic Operability for the Calculation of Transient Output Constraints for Non-Square Linear Model Predictive Controllers

Control Loop Investigations

Surface Mount Multilayer Ceramic Chip Capacitors for Ultra Small Commodity Applications

Stagnation Traps. Gianluca Benigno and Luca Fornaro

THEORIES OF GLOBAL INTERCONNECTIONS. APWH Unit 6 Part to Present

A nonlinear filtering tool for analysis of hot-loop test campaings

Overview of Control System Design

MULTITURN EXTRACTION BASED ON TRAPPING IN STABLE ISLANDS AT CERN PS: RECENT MEASUREMENT ADVANCES

ELG4112. Electromechanical Systems and Mechatronics

Model Predictive Control

APPLICATION OF THE COUPLED THREE DIMENSIONAL THERMAL- HYDRAULICS AND NEUTRON KINETICS MODELS TO PWR STEAM LINE BREAK ANALYSIS

Can Assumption-Free Batch Modeling Eliminate Processing Uncertainties?

CALCULATION OF CORRUGATED BOARD FLAT CRUSH RESISTANCE

Real-Time Implementation of Nonlinear Predictive Control

Closed-loop system 2/1/2016. Generally MIMO case. Two-degrees-of-freedom (2 DOF) control structure. (2 DOF structure) The closed loop equations become

PREDICTIONS OF MD AND CD TENSILE PROPERTY PROFILES

Index. INDEX_p /15/02 3:08 PM Page 765

Machine Direction Strength Theory of Corrugated Fiberboard

Financial Factors in Economic Fluctuations. Lawrence Christiano Roberto Motto Massimo Rostagno

Beam based measurement of beam position monitor electrode gains

10 GeV Synchrotron Longitudinal Dynamics

Model Predictive Controller of Boost Converter with RLE Load

Weather Report 30 November 2017

MIL-STD-750 NOTICE 5 METHOD

Economic Model Predictive Control Historical Perspective and Recent Developments and Industrial Examples

Philip E. Plantz, PhD Application Note. SL-AN-36 Revision A. Provided By: Microtrac, Inc. Particle Size Measuring Instrumentation

DYNAMIC VAPOR SORPTION ANALYZER FULLY AUTOMATED COMPACT BENCH-TOP DVS ANALYZER, FOR FAST AND ACCURATE SORPTION MEASUREMENTS.

Bike Plast DD some remarks

High Accuracy High Speed in Your Process

CropCast Daily Agro-Highlights Don Keeney Friday, April 22, 2016

Chapter 2 Process Variability. Overview. 2.1 Sources and Types of Variations

Steering Simulation Studies

Automated Likelihood Based Inference for Stochastic Volatility Models using AD Model Builder. Oxford, November 24th 2008 Hans J.

Systems Design Engineer, The Foxboro Company

Dynamics and PID control. Process dynamics

Sensing When the Cycle is Over. Using In-Mold Impedance Sensors in Thermoset Molding. Tom Trexler. Signature Control Systems

Identified a possible new offset location where the customer is currently exploring drill options.

Studies of Emittance Bumps and Adaptive Alignment method for ILC Main Linac

DESIGN OF AN ON-LINE TITRATOR FOR NONLINEAR ph CONTROL

Introduction to sensitivity analysis

THERMAL IMPEDANCE (RESPONSE) TESTING OF DIODES

Lecture 15: Scaling & Economics

1 Unified Power Flow Controller (UPFC)

Transcription:

Gain Delay Retune in Multivariable Controls for the Paper Making Process Stephen Chu Software Application Manager, Honeywell Joyce Choi Software Application Manager, Honeywell 500 Brooksbank Ave., N. Vancouver, BC 500 Brooksbank Ave., N. Vancouver, BC V7J 3S4, Canada V7J 3S4, Canada Tel: (604) 980-3421 Tel: (604) 980-3421 E-mail: stephen.chu@honeywell.com E-mail: joyce.choi@honeywell.com ABSTRACT The paper making process, like many industrial processes, exhibits nonlinear behavior. The nonlinearities can become more severe in situations where large operating condition changes take place. Performing multivariable MD (machine direction) control based on linear process models formulated as first or higher order transfer functions in the Laplace domain becomes insufficient and inaccurate when these large operating condition changes are encountered. The problem is that a multivariable MD control transfer function uses a static gain and time delay, which will vary with operating conditions in a nonlinear process. This paper examines a solution that involves automatically retuning the gain and time delay based on nonlinear mass balance and process interactions. The studied paper machine was in slow-back mode due to production limitations where the machine speed was almost half of its nominal speed. INTRODUCTION In today s economy where paper demand fluctuates, papermakers struggle with operations of their paper machines. To meet these fluctuations, the papermakers stress their paper machines beyond their tuned operational constraints to keep their paper machines running. The papermakers inevitably accept lower quality paper and risk stable runability during a slow-back run as it is the better of two evils keep their paper machine running at a lower machine speed rate or shutdown their paper machine entirely and start back up again when they are guaranteed to sell their production at full speed. Multivariable model predictive control (MPC) transfer functions are typically determined with bump tests at nominal paper machine speeds (i.e. the typical speeds that are encountered during paper manufacturing). These transfer functions assume the paper process to be linear in the operating range for them to be accurate. When the machines speed is significantly reduced, these transfer functions become inaccurate because the paper machine operating conditions fall outside this linear range and the paper quality and runability suffer. Automatically retuning the gain and time delay based on a nominal machine speed and the current slow-back machine speed will address this issue that papermakers are faced with today. The Gain Delay Retune Function is a software application that runs in conjunction with the MPC MD controls. This paper examines the Gain Delay Retune Function in the MPC MD control package and shows results on the studied paper machine that produces linerboard. PaperCon 2011 Page 2431

MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROL Backström [1] has documented the description and history of the use of MPC in MD controls in the paper industry. The current version of this controller is called Profit and is what is used today for multivariable MD controls. The problem is that the MPC MD control transfer functions use a static gain and time delay and these will vary with large machine speed changes. The Gain Delay Retune Function automatically retunes the gain and time delay based on a nominal speed and the current speed. THE LINERBOARD PROCESS The studied paper machine produces linerboard and the manipulated variables (MVs) and controlled variables (CVs) are typical of any paper machine MD controls. It is a Fourdrinier machine with a press section, five dryer sections and a reel scanner that measures dry weight and moisture. The control elements in the machine direction are: 1) Stock Flow (MV) 2) 1 st Dryer Section Steam Biased to 5 th Dryer Section Steam 3) 2 nd Dryer Section Steam Biased to 5 th Dryer Section Steam 4) 3 rd Dryer Section Steam Biased to 5 th Dryer Section Steam 5) 4 th Dryer Section Steam Biased to 5 th Dryer Section Steam 6) 5 th Dryer Section Steam (MV) 7) Machine Speed (MV) 8) Reel Dry Weight (CV) 9) Reel Moisture - Controlled Variable (CV) Figure 1 shows the paper machine overview with multivariable MPC with gain delay retune and Figure 2 shows the MPC matrix. Figure 1. Paper Machine Overview with Multivariable MPC with Gain Delay Retune PaperCon 2011 Page 2432

Stock Flow Machine Speed 5th Dryer Pressure Section Dry Weight Reel Moisture Figure 2. Multivariable MPC Control Matrix MULTIVARIABLE MPC LINEAR TRANSFER FUNCTION NOMINAL BASELINE The Gain Delay Retune Function requires a baseline to be established beforehand so the function can use this baseline to determine how the gain and time delay of a linear process model vary due to operating conditions changes. The baseline is defined by the nominal process values of the CVs and MVs in the system, and nominal gains and time delays of the linear process model relating the CVs and MVs. The nominal process values are collected before the bump tests to ensure they represent steady state values. The nominal gains and time delays are obtained from the linear process models identified based on the results of the bump tests performed in the same steady state. Figure 3 shows the transfer function of the of the CV-MV pair Moisture-5 th Dryer Pressure at the nominal machine speed of 2100 fpm. Figure 3. MPC Transfer Function for Moisture-5 th Dryer Pressure In this paper, only the CV-MV pair Moisture-5 th Dryer Pressure was enabled for the Gain Delay Retune Function. Other CV-MV pairs were not enabled because the Dry Weight CV was unaffected by the slow-back run of the paper machine. PaperCon 2011 Page 2433

GAIN DELAY RETUNE ON MACHINE SPEED For the part of the gain retune, the Gain Delay Retune Function calculates an Effective Gain (Equation [2]), which is calculated from a Speed Gain Retune Factor (Equation [1]) that is based on the current machine speed and the nominal machine speed. The Effective Gain is the gain used in the MPC MD controller. (1) Where the Speed Gain Retune Factor Weight = 1 A Speed Gain Retune Factor Weight more than 1 gives more emphasis on a speed change. A Speed Gain Retune Factor Weight less than 1 gives less emphasis on a speed change. A Speed Gain Retune Factor Weight of 0 turns off the Gain Delay Retune Function. (2) For the part of the delay retune, the Gain Delay Retune Function calculates a delay offset, which is the difference between the delay calculated by the Gain Delay Retune Function and the nominal delay for the linear process model CV-MV pair Moisture-5 th Dryer Pressure. The delay offset is the result of the change in variable (transport) time delay due to the change in machine speed. GAIN DELAY RETUNE ON A LINERBOARD MACHINE Figure 4 shows the trended values of the CV-MV pair Moisture-5 th Dryer Pressure along with the Machine Speed while the Gain Delay Retune Function was off and then turned on. The linerboard machine was in slow-back mode because of production limitations. The nominal machine speed is 2100 fpm and the machine speed was continually being reduced to a minimum of 1225 fpm. With the Gain Delay Retune Function turned off, a model mismatch of the CV-MV pair Moisture-5 th Dryer Pressure was observed the 5 th Dryer Pressure MV exhibits oscillations at approximately the same frequency of the Moisture CV. Paper quality and stable runability were at risk. At approximately 8:30, the Gain Delay Retune Function was turned on and the Moisture CV immediately flattened (along with the 5 th Dryer Pressure MV). The Moisture 2σ was reduced from 0.49 to 0.34, or a 30% reduction. Paper quality and runability immediately improved with the Gain Delay Retune Function enabled. PaperCon 2011 Page 2434

Figure 4. Gain Delay Retune on a Linerboard Machine CONCLUSION There are great benefits of using MPC for MD control in the paper industry. It has been well documented that MPC can significantly reduce energy costs [2], raw material costs [3], and can maximize production consistently in a dryer limited operation [4]. However, the limitation in using MPC is that the transfer functions assume the paper process to be linear in the operating range. This is more than adequate during normal operations, but in today s economy where paper demand fluctuates, the papermakers are asked to reduce production in a slow-back mode. These operating conditions are beyond the linear range and the papermakers are forced to produce lower paper quality and risk stable runability. The Gain Delay Retune Function in the MPC MD controls addresses this issue by automatically retuning the gain and time delay based on a nominal machine speed and the current slow-back machine speed. The studied linerboard machine showed a significant reduction (30%) in 2σ spread in moisture when the Gain Retune Function was enabled thereby increasing the paper quality and runability. PaperCon 2011 Page 2435

REFERENCES [1] J. U. Backström, P. Baker, A Benefit Analysis of Model Predictive Machine Directional Control of Paper Machines, Proceedings from 2008 Control Systems/Pan Pacific Conference, June 16-18, Vancouver, BC, Canada, pp. 197-202. [2] S. Chu, R. MacHattie, J. U. Backström, Multivariable Control and Energy Optimization of Tissue Machines, Proceedings from PACWEST 2009, June 10-13, Delta Sun Peaks, BC, Canada. [3] S. Chu, Wet End Control Applications using a Multivariable Model Predictive Control Strategy, Proceedings from PACWEST 2008, June 18-21, Jasper, AB, Canada. [4] S. Chu, J. U. Backström, Multivariable Control and Production Optimization of Paper Machines, Proceedings from PACWEST 2010, June 9-12, Delta Sun Peaks, BC, Canada. PaperCon 2011 Page 2436