MARTINGALES: VARIANCE. EY = 0 Var (Y ) = σ 2

Similar documents
1. Stochastic Processes and filtrations

MFE6516 Stochastic Calculus for Finance

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY 6.265/15.070J Fall 2013 Lecture 7 9/25/2013

Brownian motion. Samy Tindel. Purdue University. Probability Theory 2 - MA 539

Brownian Motion. Chapter Definition of Brownian motion

Lecture 22 Girsanov s Theorem

Solutions to the Exercises in Stochastic Analysis

PROBABILITY: LIMIT THEOREMS II, SPRING HOMEWORK PROBLEMS

PROBABILITY: LIMIT THEOREMS II, SPRING HOMEWORK PROBLEMS

(A n + B n + 1) A n + B n

Randomization in the First Hitting Time Problem

Preliminary Exam: Probability 9:00am 2:00pm, Friday, January 6, 2012

Brownian Motion and Stochastic Calculus

Risk-Minimality and Orthogonality of Martingales

6. Brownian Motion. Q(A) = P [ ω : x(, ω) A )

Modern Discrete Probability Branching processes

Lecture 17 Brownian motion as a Markov process

STAT 331. Martingale Central Limit Theorem and Related Results

B8.3 Mathematical Models for Financial Derivatives. Hilary Term Solution Sheet 2

Solution for Problem 7.1. We argue by contradiction. If the limit were not infinite, then since τ M (ω) is nondecreasing we would have

Math 6810 (Probability) Fall Lecture notes

Brownian Motion. 1 Definition Brownian Motion Wiener measure... 3

Lecture 2. We now introduce some fundamental tools in martingale theory, which are useful in controlling the fluctuation of martingales.

Theory and Applications of Stochastic Systems Lecture Exponential Martingale for Random Walk

On the quantiles of the Brownian motion and their hitting times.

Gaussian, Markov and stationary processes

Small-time asymptotics of stopped Lévy bridges and simulation schemes with controlled bias

Brownian Motion and Poisson Process

1 Gambler s Ruin Problem

Notes 15 : UI Martingales

Selected Exercises on Expectations and Some Probability Inequalities

{σ x >t}p x. (σ x >t)=e at.

1 IEOR 6712: Notes on Brownian Motion I

Stochastic Process (ENPC) Monday, 22nd of January 2018 (2h30)

Least Squares Regression

Stochastic Calculus Notes, Lecture 5 Last modified October 21, 2004

Applications of Ito s Formula

Exercises. T 2T. e ita φ(t)dt.

Duration-Based Volatility Estimation

P (A G) dp G P (A G)

ERRATA: Probabilistic Techniques in Analysis

Lecture 4: Introduction to stochastic processes and stochastic calculus

A Central Limit Theorem for Fleming-Viot Particle Systems Application to the Adaptive Multilevel Splitting Algorithm

Stochastic Analysis. King s College London Version 1.4 October Markus Riedle

ELEMENTS OF PROBABILITY THEORY

On the martingales obtained by an extension due to Saisho, Tanemura and Yor of Pitman s theorem

Universal examples. Chapter The Bernoulli process

Non-arbitrage condition and thin random times

Reflected Brownian Motion

Stochastic integral. Introduction. Ito integral. References. Appendices Stochastic Calculus I. Geneviève Gauthier.

(6, 4) Is there arbitrage in this market? If so, find all arbitrages. If not, find all pricing kernels.

lim n C1/n n := ρ. [f(y) f(x)], y x =1 [f(x) f(y)] [g(x) g(y)]. (x,y) E A E(f, f),

Brownian Motion and the Dirichlet Problem

Filtrations, Markov Processes and Martingales. Lectures on Lévy Processes and Stochastic Calculus, Braunschweig, Lecture 3: The Lévy-Itô Decomposition

IEOR 4701: Stochastic Models in Financial Engineering. Summer 2007, Professor Whitt. SOLUTIONS to Homework Assignment 9: Brownian motion

Stochastic Calculus for Finance II - some Solutions to Chapter VII

Least Squares Regression

Ernesto Mordecki. Talk presented at the. Finnish Mathematical Society

Question 1. The correct answers are: (a) (2) (b) (1) (c) (2) (d) (3) (e) (2) (f) (1) (g) (2) (h) (1)

Exponential martingales: uniform integrability results and applications to point processes

Jump-type Levy Processes

Exercises in stochastic analysis

On pathwise stochastic integration

Stochastic Processes and Stochastic Analysis Notes of the Lecture by Prof. M. Schweizer

Lecture 12. F o s, (1.1) F t := s>t

9 Brownian Motion: Construction

In terms of measures: Exercise 1. Existence of a Gaussian process: Theorem 2. Remark 3.

Markov processes and queueing networks

1 Basics of probability theory

Exercise 4. An optional time which is not a stopping time

FE 5204 Stochastic Differential Equations

Inference for Stochastic Processes

The Azéma-Yor Embedding in Non-Singular Diffusions

Exam Stochastic Processes 2WB08 - March 10, 2009,

The Uses of Differential Geometry in Finance

1 Linear Difference Equations

Ernesto Mordecki 1. Lecture III. PASI - Guanajuato - June 2010

Lecture 21 Representations of Martingales

Random Times and Their Properties

Perhaps the simplest way of modeling two (discrete) random variables is by means of a joint PMF, defined as follows.

Functional Limit theorems for the quadratic variation of a continuous time random walk and for certain stochastic integrals

Multiple Random Variables

On the dual problem of utility maximization

Poisson random measure: motivation

Uniformly Uniformly-ergodic Markov chains and BSDEs

Partial Differential Equations with Applications to Finance Seminar 1: Proving and applying Dynkin s formula

Verona Course April Lecture 1. Review of probability

Outline. A Central Limit Theorem for Truncating Stochastic Algorithms

UCSD ECE250 Handout #27 Prof. Young-Han Kim Friday, June 8, Practice Final Examination (Winter 2017)

Branching Processes II: Convergence of critical branching to Feller s CSB

Robust pricing hedging duality for American options in discrete time financial markets

Density models for credit risk

Numerical Methods with Lévy Processes

Math Probability Theory and Stochastic Process

Admin and Lecture 1: Recap of Measure Theory

Notes 18 : Optional Sampling Theorem

The instantaneous and forward default intensity of structural models

1 Math 285 Homework Problem List for S2016

1.1 Definition of BM and its finite-dimensional distributions

LECTURE 2: LOCAL TIME FOR BROWNIAN MOTION

Transcription:

MARTINGALES: VARIANCE SIMPLEST CASE: X t = Y 1 +... + Y t IID SUM V t = X 2 t σ 2 t IS A MG: EY = 0 Var (Y ) = σ 2 V t+1 = (X t + Y t+1 ) 2 σ 2 (t + 1) = V t + 2X t Y t+1 + Y 2 t+1 σ 2 E(V t+1 F t ) = V t + 2X t E(Y t+1 F t ) = V t = 0 + E(Yt+1 2 F t ) σ 2 = 0 Autumn 2008 1 Per A. Mykland

QUADRATIC VARIATION (Q.V.) X t = Y 1 +... + Y t : MG (not iid) OBSERVED Q.V. : [X, X] t = Y 2 1 +... + Y 2 t V t = X 2 t [X, X] t : MG V t+1 = (X t + Y t+1 ) 2 [X, X] t+1 = X 2 t + 2X t Y t+1 + Y 2 t+1 ([X, X] t + Y 2 t+1) = V t + 2X t Y t+1 E(V t+1 F t ) = V t + 2X t E(Y t+1 F t ) = V t PREDICTABLE Q. V. : X, X t =Var (Y 1 F 0 ) +...+ Var (Y t F t 1 ) [X, X] t X, X t = t i=1 X 2 t X, X t = MG, TOO Y 2 i E(Y 2 i F i 1 ) = MG Autumn 2008 2 Per A. Mykland

CONTINUOUS MARTINGALES * TWO CONTINUITIES: TIME ITSELF: M t, 0 t T (or 0 t < ) PROCESS PATH: t M t = M t (ω) CONTINUOUS FUNCTION OF TIME * QUADRATIC VARIATION FOR CONTINUOUS MGs: M ti = M ti+1 M ti [M, M] t = lim SAME AS t i+1 t M 2 t i max t i 0 {}}{ 0 t 1 t 2 t 3 t M, M t = lim t i+1 t Var ( M ti F ti ) Autumn 2008 3 Per A. Mykland

PROOF THAT M, M t = [M, M] t : BEFORE CONVERGENCE: L t = Mt 2 i t i+1 t t i+1 t L IS A MARTINGALE, AND SO Var ( M ti F ti ) L ti = M 2 t i Var ( M ti F ti ) SO E[ L 2 t i ] = E[( M 2 t i Var ( M ti F ti )) 2 ] 2E[( M 4 t i + Var ( M ti F ti ) 2 ] = 2E[ M 4 t i + E( M 2 t i F ti ) 2 ] 2E[ M 4 t i + E( M 4 t i F ti )] = 4E[ M 4 t i ] Var (L ti ) = E[L, L] ti 4E[ Mt 4 i ] t i+1 t 4E max j M 2 t j t i+1 t = 4E [ max M 2 t i [M, M] t ] Mt 2 i 0 as max t i 0 BY CONTINUITY QED (CF. SHREVE II, THM 3.4.3 (p. 102)) Autumn 2008 4 Per A. Mykland

CONTINUOUS MG HAVE INFINITE PATH. A MG TOTAL VARIATION: TV (M) t = lim M ti t i+1 <t QUADRATIC VARIATION: t i+1 <t M 2 t i }{{ } [M,M] t >0 max M t1 }{{} 0 (CONTINUITY) M ti t i+1 <t }{{ } T V (M) t HENCE TV (M) t IS INFINITE Autumn 2008 5 Per A. Mykland

THE THEORY IS ONLY APPROXIMATELY CORRECT dependence of estimated volatility on sampling frequency volatility of AA, Jan 4, 2001, annualized, sq. root scale 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 5 10 15 20 sampling frequency Plot of realized volatility (quadratic variation of log price) for Alcoa Aluminum for January 4, 2001. The data is from the TAQ database. There are 2011 transactions on that day, on average one every 13.365 seconds. The most frequently sampled volatility uses all the data, and this is denoted as frequency= 1. Frequency=2 corresponds to taking every second sampling point. Because this gives rise to two estimators of volatility, we have averaged the two. And so on for frequency= k up to 20. The plot corresponds to the average realized volatility. Volatilities are given on an annualized and square root scale. Autumn 2008 6 Per A. Mykland

SOLUTION TO PROBLEM log S ti = martingale + constant t + ǫ i t i = transaction time # i S ti = value of stock at time t i ǫ i : (almost) independent noise (very small) STOCK BEHAVES LIKE A MEASUREMENT OF UN- DERLYING SEMI-MARTINGALE ǫ i is too small for effective arbitrage Autumn 2008 7 Per A. Mykland

(ADDITIVE) BROWNIAN MOTION W t ORIGINAL DEFINITION: (1) W 0 = 0 (2) t W t IS CONTINUOUS (3) HAS INDEPENDENT INCREMENTS (4) W t+s W s N(0, t) ALTERNATIVE DEFINITION ( LEVY S THEOREM ): (i) W 0 = 0 (ii) W t is MG, CONTINUOUS (iii) [W, W] t = t PROOF THAT ORIG DEF => (iii): BEFORE CONVERGENCE: W, W ti = W, W ti+1 W, W ti =Var (W ti+1 W ti F ti ) = t i+1 t i AND SO W, W t t AS t i 0 FROM p. 3-4: [W, W] t = W, W t QED Autumn 2008 8 Per A. Mykland

MARKOV PROPERTY FOR t s, and W s = w E(f(W t ) F s ) = E(f(W t W s + W s ) F s ) = E(f(W t W s + w) F s ) = E(f(W t W s + w)) since W t W s independent of F s = E(f( t sz + w)) where Z is N(0, 1) = g(w) = g(w s ) HERE g(w) = f( t sz + w)φ(z)dz AS ALWAYS: WE CAN IN PARTICULAR TAKE TO GET (FOR SOME g): f(w) = I {W A} P(W t A F s ) = g(w s ) CONDITIONAL DISTRIBUTION OF W t GIVEN F s DEPENDS ONLY ON W s Autumn 2008 9 Per A. Mykland

FIRST PASSAGE TIMES m IS A BARRIER, m > 0 τ = inf{t 0 : W t = m} = FIRST TIME THAT W t HITS m τ IS A STOPPING TIME B-S MARTINGALE: S t = exp(σw t 1 2 σ2 t) W t τ m: ON THE SET {τ = }: S t τ exp(σm 1 2 σ2 (t τ)) 0 when t OPTIONAL STOPPING: 1 = E[ S t τ ] E[ S τ I {τ< } ] when t BECAUSE OF DOMINATED CONVERGENCE: W t τ m AND t τ 0 => S t τ exp(σm) Autumn 2008 10 Per A. Mykland

FIRST PASSAGE TIMES (cont d) 1 = E[ S τ I {τ< } ] = E[exp(σW τ 1 2 σ2 τ)i {τ< } ] = E[exp(σm 1 2 σ2 τ)i {τ< } ] LET σ 0: 1 = EI {τ< } = P(τ < ) SIMPLIFIED FORMULA: 1 = E[exp(σm 1 2 σ2 τ)] = exp(σm)e[exp( 1 2 σ2 τ)] OR: E[exp( 1 2 σ2 τ)] = exp( σm) SET α = σ 2 /2 E[exp( ατ)] = exp( m 2α) THIS IS THE LAPLACE TRANSFORM OF THE DISTRIBUTION OF τ Autumn 2008 11 Per A. Mykland

LAPLACE TRANSFORM: E[exp( ατ)] = exp( m 2α) BECAUSE: COROLLARY: E[τ] = d E[exp( ατ)] = E[τ exp( ατ)] E[τ] as α 0 dα d m E[exp( ατ)] = exp( m 2α) as α 0 dα 2α QED Autumn 2008 12 Per A. Mykland

REFLECTION PRINCIPLE AS BEFORE: τ = inf{t 0 : W t = m} = FIRST TIME THAT W t HITS m PRINCIPLE (for 0, w m): P(τ t and W t w) = P(W t 2m w) REASON FOR THIS FORMULA STRONG MARKOV PROPERTY: W t = W t+τ W τ, t 0, IS A BROWNIAN MOTION (PROOF: OPTIONAL STOPPING THEOREM; AL- TERNATIVE DEFINITION OF BROWNIAN MOTION) THEN BY SYMMETRY, ON {τ t}, FOR x 0: P(W t m x F τ ) = P(W t W τ x F τ ) = P(W t W τ x F τ ) = P(W t m x F τ ) Autumn 2008 13 Per A. Mykland

REWRITE AS INDICATOR FUNCTION: AND SO E(I {Wt m x} F τ ) = E(I {Wt m x} F τ ) E(I {Wt m x}i {τ t} ) = E[E(I {Wt m x}i {τ t} ) F τ )] (tower property) = E[E(I {Wt m x} F τ )]I {τ t} ) = E[E(I {Wt m x} F τ )]I {τ t} ) = E[E(I {Wt m x}i {τ t} ) F τ )] = E[E(I {Wt m x} F τ )] since{w t m x} {τ t} = E(I {Wt m x}) REWRITE AS PROBABILITIES: P(W t m x AND τ t) = P(W t m x) SUBSTITUTE w = m x TO OBTAIN PRINCIPLE (QED) Autumn 2008 14 Per A. Mykland

CONSEQUENCE: DISTRIBUTION OF τ P(τ t) = 2 exp{ y2 }dy for t 0 ( ) 2π m 2 t BECAUSE: SET w = m IN REFLECTION PRINCI- PLE, OBTAIN: P(τ t AND W t m) = P(W t m) ALSO, SINCE {W t m} {τ t}: P(τ t AND W t m) = P(W t m) ADD THESE TWO: P(τ t) = P(τ t AND W t m) + P(τ t AND W t m) = P(W t m) + P(W t m) = 2P(W t m) THIS SHOWS (*) DENSITY: f τ (t) = d m dtp(τ t) = t 2πt exp{ m2 2t } Autumn 2008 15 Per A. Mykland

DISTRIBUTION OF MAXIMUM OF BROWNIAN MOTION M t = max 0 s t W s USE M t m IF AND ONLY IF τ t FROM PREVIOUS PAGE: P(M t m) = P(τ t) = 2P(W t m) = P( W t m) THEREFORE: M t HAS SAME DISTRIBUTION AS W t Autumn 2008 16 Per A. Mykland

USE JOINT DISTRIBUTION BROWNIAN MOTION AND ITS MAXIMUM M t = max 0 s t W s M t m IF AND ONLY IF τ t REFLECTION PRINCIPLE BECOMES (0, w m): P(M t m and W t w) = P(τ t and W t w) = P(W t 2m w) REWRITE WITH DENSITIES m w f M(t),W(t) (x, y)dxdy = 1 2πt 2m w exp{ z2 2t }dz / m: w f M(t),W(t) (m, y) = 2 (2m w)2 exp{ } 2πt 2t / w: 2(2m w) f M(t),W(t) (m, w) = t 2πt exp{ (2m w)2 2t } Autumn 2008 17 Per A. Mykland

FINAL FORM OF DENSITY f M(t),W(t) (m, w) = 2(2m w) t 2πt exp{ (2m w)2 2t } for 0, w m (otherwise f M(t),W(t) (m, w) = 0) CONDITIONAL DISTRIBUTION f M(t) W(t) (m w) = f M(t),W(t)(m, w) f W(t) (w) = = 2(2m w) t 2πt exp{ (2m w)2 2t } 1 2πt exp{ w2 2t } 2(2m w) t exp{ 2m(m w) } 2t Autumn 2008 18 Per A. Mykland

STOPPED σ-fields WHAT MEANING CAN WE GIVE TO F τ? (F t ) IS FILTRATION τ IS (F t )-STOPPING TIME DEFINE: F τ = {A F : A {τ t} F t for all t} F τ : THE SETS A WHICH CAN BE DETERMINED ONCE τ HAS OCCURRED, OR THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE AT TIME τ F τ IS A σ-field EXTENDED OPTIONAL STOPPING THEOREM: SUPPOSE τ 1 and τ 2 ARE TWO STOPPING TIMES, τ 1, τ 2 0, τ 1 T. SUPPOSE (M t ) IS A MARTIN- GALE. THEN E(M τ1 F τ2 ) = M τ1 τ 2 Autumn 2008 19 Per A. Mykland