C:\Users\joc\Documents\IT\Robot EC3 6_2_1 (5)\Eurocode _2_1(5) Concentrated Load - Rev 1_0.mcdx. γ M γ M γ M2 1.

Similar documents
Fundamentals of Structural Design Part of Steel Structures

3. Stability of built-up members in compression

Lecture 7: The Beam Element Equations.

APPENDIX 1 MODEL CALCULATION OF VARIOUS CODES

PLATE GIRDERS II. Load. Web plate Welds A Longitudinal elevation. Fig. 1 A typical Plate Girder

Unbraced Column Verification Example. AISC Design Examples AISC 13 th Edition. ASDIP Steel is available for purchase online at

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of a Trans-National Approach

BASE PLATE CONNECTIONS

D : SOLID MECHANICS. Q. 1 Q. 9 carry one mark each. Q.1 Find the force (in kn) in the member BH of the truss shown.

Engineering Science OUTCOME 1 - TUTORIAL 4 COLUMNS

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach

Design of Compression Members

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach

NUMERICAL EVALUATION OF THE ROTATIONAL CAPACITY OF STEEL BEAMS AT ELEVATED TEMPERATURES

PLATE AND BOX GIRDER STIFFENER DESIGN IN VIEW OF EUROCODE 3 PART 1.5

Basis of Design, a case study building

Accordingly, the nominal section strength [resistance] for initiation of yielding is calculated by using Equation C-C3.1.

Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2014 Design of fixed beam-to-column connection EN :2005/AC:2009

Finite Element Modelling with Plastic Hinges

[8] Bending and Shear Loading of Beams

Advanced stability analysis and design of a new Danube archbridge. DUNAI, László JOÓ, Attila László VIGH, László Gergely

Critical Load columns buckling critical load

2. (a) Explain different types of wing structures. (b) Explain the advantages and disadvantages of different materials used for aircraft

1C8 Advanced design of steel structures. prepared by Josef Machacek

DESIGN OF BUCKLING RESISTANCE OF COMPRESSED HSS - CHANNELS

STEEL BUILDINGS IN EUROPE. Multi-Storey Steel Buildings Part 10: Technical Software Specification for Composite Beams

MECHANICS OF MATERIALS Design of a Transmission Shaft

Chapter 6: Cross-Sectional Properties of Structural Members

Chapter 5 Elastic Strain, Deflection, and Stability 1. Elastic Stress-Strain Relationship

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach

Research Collection. Numerical analysis on the fire behaviour of steel plate girders. Conference Paper. ETH Library

A CONNECTION ELEMENT FOR MODELLING END-PLATE CONNECTIONS IN FIRE

Mechanics of Materials CIVL 3322 / MECH 3322

An Increase in Elastic Buckling Strength of Plate Girder by the Influence of Transverse Stiffeners

GENERAL GEOMETRY LEFT SIDE BEAM RIGHT SIDE BS :2000/AC:2009. Ratio 0.17

CHAPTER 5. Beam Theory

UNIVERSITY OF AKRON Department of Civil Engineering

ENGINEERING SCIENCE H1 OUTCOME 1 - TUTORIAL 4 COLUMNS EDEXCEL HNC/D ENGINEERING SCIENCE LEVEL 4 H1 FORMERLY UNIT 21718P

Supplement: Statically Indeterminate Trusses and Frames

TORSION INCLUDING WARPING OF OPEN SECTIONS (I, C, Z, T AND L SHAPES)

UNIT- I Thin plate theory, Structural Instability:

UNSYMMETRICAL BENDING

APPENDIX A Thickness of Base Metal

A Simply supported beam with a concentrated load at mid-span: Loading Stages

SECTION 7 DESIGN OF COMPRESSION MEMBERS

Lecture Slides. Chapter 4. Deflection and Stiffness. The McGraw-Hill Companies 2012

Elastic buckling of web plates in I-girders under patch and wheel loading

Design of Beams (Unit - 8)

Job No. Sheet 1 of 7 Rev A. Made by ER/EM Date Feb Checked by HB Date March 2006

7.6 Stress in symmetrical elastic beam transmitting both shear force and bending moment

Experimental investigation on monotonic performance of steel curved knee braces for weld-free beam-to-column connections

Formulation of Equivalent Steel Section for Partially Encased Composite Column under Concentric Gravity Loading

ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures. III. Compression Members

Unit 15 Shearing and Torsion (and Bending) of Shell Beams


Stress Analysis Lecture 4 ME 276 Spring Dr./ Ahmed Mohamed Nagib Elmekawy

Properties of Sections

Aalto University School of Engineering

STEEL BUILDINGS IN EUROPE. Multi-Storey Steel Buildings Part 8: Description of member resistance calculator

Where and are the factored end moments of the column and >.

A Simplified Method for the Design of Steel Beam-to-column Connections

FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF TAPERED COMPOSITE PLATE GIRDER WITH A NON-LINEAR VARYING WEB DEPTH

of I Section Members

Introduction to Aerospace Engineering

March 24, Chapter 4. Deflection and Stiffness. Dr. Mohammad Suliman Abuhaiba, PE

STRUCTURAL VERIFICATION OF A 60.7 M DOME ROOF FOR TANK FB 2110

This procedure covers the determination of the moment of inertia about the neutral axis.

STEEL MEMBER DESIGN (EN :2005)

SIMPLIFIED FORMULAS FOR ASSESSMENT OF STEEL JOINT FLEXIBILITY CHARACTERISTICS

Shafts: Torsion of Circular Shafts Reading: Crandall, Dahl and Lardner 6.2, 6.3

TRANSVERSE PLATE-TO-SQUARE/RECTANGULAR HSS CONNECTIONS

DESIGN OF BEAM-COLUMNS - II

Nomenclature. Length of the panel between the supports. Width of the panel between the supports/ width of the beam

Steel Post Load Analysis

General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD

CHAPTER 4: BENDING OF BEAMS

Compression Members. ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures. III. Compression Members. Introduction. Compression Members (cont.)

Design of Steel Structures Prof. Damodar Maity Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati

Mechanics of Solids I. Transverse Loading

MECHANICS OF MATERIALS

7.3 Design of members subjected to combined forces

Stress Analysis Lecture 3 ME 276 Spring Dr./ Ahmed Mohamed Nagib Elmekawy

1C8 Advanced design of steel structures. prepared by Josef Machacek

University of Sheffield. Department of Civil Structural Engineering. Member checks - Rafter 44.6

Eurocode 3 for Dummies The Opportunities and Traps

Studies on Plate Girder with Various Types of Web Plates

AXIAL BUCKLING RESISTANCE OF PARTIALLY ENCASED COLUMNS

ON THE DESIGN OF A STEEL END-PLATE BEAM-TO-COLUMN BOLTED JOINT ACCORDING TO PN-EN

Influence of residual stresses in the structural behavior of. tubular columns and arches. Nuno Rocha Cima Gomes

Mechanics of Structure

DESIGN OF BEAMS AND SHAFTS

Advanced Analysis of Steel Structures

Welcome to the Spreadsheet for Linear Buckling Analysis of Stiffened Plate Panels (as per DNV RP-C-201)

National Exams May 2015

Cork Institute of Technology. Autumn 2007 Mechanics of Materials (Time: 3 Hours)

Chapter 4. Test results and discussion. 4.1 Introduction to Experimental Results

ŽILINSKÁ UNIVERZITA V ŽILINE. Fakulta stavebná BRIDGES. Examples. Jozef GOCÁL

On Design Method of Lateral-torsional Buckling of Beams: State of the Art and a New Proposal for a General Type Design Method

Design of a Multi-Storied RC Building

Transcription:

C:\Users\joc\Documents\IT\Robot EC3 6 1 (5)\Eurocode 1993-1-1 6 1(5) Concentrated Load - Rev 1_0.mcdx Page 1 of 01/03/016 Section sec HEB500 with steel grade gr S355 I x Iy_sec (sec) cm 4 = 10700 cm 4 A V Avz_sec (sec) cm = 89.8 cm h h_sec (sec) mm = 500 mm b b_sec (sec) mm = 300 mm t f tf_sec (sec) mm = 8 mm t w tw_sec (sec) mm = 14.5 mm r r_sec (sec) mm = 7 mm Safety factors according to Eurocode S-E 1993 γ M0 1.00 γ M1 1.10 γ M 1.5 Yield Stress f y fy_sec ( sec, gr) = 355, Design Stress f, mm mm d = 355 γ M0 mm f y E metal 10 k mm EC3 6..1 (5) Total Stress (as per eq 6.1) σ σ x, σ z, τ σ x + σ z σ x σ z + 3 τ Load spreading length ss 0 mm ROBOT 015.7 k m, V Ed 0 k, 185 k y h t f = 0. m, σ x.ed y = 4.701, I x mm τ Ed 0 mm l t f + ss = 76 mm, width t w = 14.5 mm, σ z.ed = 167.877 mm = 165.6, (eq 6.1) mm float, 4 7415.0 1605 ACTUAL Point 1 - Bottom level of wing or begining of radius (going downwards) y h t f = 0. m, σ x.ed y = 4.701, as a simplification I x mm τ Ed 0 mm l t f + ss = 76 mm, width r+ t w = 68.5 mm, σ z.ed = 35.536 mm = 33.4, (eq 6.1) mm float, 4 1118.0 1605 Point Simplified - End of radius (going downwards) y h t f r = 0.195 m, σ x.ed y = 4.19 I x mm (eq 6.1) τ Ed V Ed = 0, A,, (>0.6?) A V mm w h t f t w = 6438 mm A f b t f = 8400 mm A f = 1.305 A w l t f + ss = 76 mm, width t w = 14.5 mm, σ z.ed = 167.877 mm

C:\Users\joc\Documents\IT\Robot EC3 6 1 (5)\Eurocode 1993-1-1 6 1(5) Concentrated Load - Rev 1_0.mcdx Page of 01/03/016 = 165.9, (eq 6.1) mm float, 4 7506.0 1605 Point - End of radius (going downwards) y h t f r = 0.195 m, σ x.ed y = 4.19 I x mm Static moment at point : S x b t f h t f + t w r h t f r + r 1 π h t f 0.3 r = 131.605 cm 3 4 τ Ed V Ed S x = 0 I x t w mm l t f + ss = 76 mm, width t w = 14.5 mm, σ z.ed = 167.877 mm = 165.9, (eq 6.1) mm float, 4 7506.0 1605

DETAILED AALYSIS according to Eurocode 3 (E 1993-1-5:005) for member no. Beam_ SECTIO PARAMETERS: HEB 500 ht=500 mm bf=300 mm Ay=16800 mm Az=750 mm Ax=3860 mm tw=15 mm Iy=107000000 mm4 Iz=1600000 mm4 Ix=5400000 mm4 tf=8 mm Wely=488000 mm3 Welz=841333 mm3 TRASVERSE STIFFEERS Stiffener positions: Translation: a = 0.00 m; b = 0.00 m COCETRATED FORCES Force positions: 1.0; 3.0; 4.40; 5.95; 7.15; 9.15; Force 1 F1 = -185.00 k ss1 = 0 mm Force F = -357.00 k ss = 0 mm Force 3 F3 = -497.00 k ss3 = 0 mm Force 4 F4 = -497.00 k ss4 = 0 mm Force 5 F5 = -357.00 k ss5 = 0 mm Force 6 F6 = -185.00 k ss6 = 0 mm real coordinates real coordinates SHEAR BUCKLIG RESISTACE (EC3 art. 5) Lam_w - relative web slenderness [5..(5)] kt - local buckling coefficient for shear [A.3.(1)] Xw - Influence factor for shear resistance (web) [5.3.(1)] Xf - Influence factor for shear resistance (flange) [5.4.(1)] Xv - Instability factor for shear [5..(1)] Mf,Rd - Design resistance of section flanges [5.4.(1)]

VEd - Maximum shear force in a panel [5..(1)] Vb,Rd - Design shear buckling resistance [5..(1)] Panel A Panel coordinates A x = (0.00 ; 1.00) Point x = 7.4 m According to paragraph 5.1.(), it is not necessary to check resistance to local shear buckling. RESISTACE OF WEBS TO TRASVERSE FORCES (EC3 art.5.7) ss - Length of stiff bearing [Figure 6.] m1 - Reduction factor Leff [6.5.(1)] m - Reduction factor Leff [6.5.(1)] kf - Web buckling coefficient [Figure 6.1] Xf - Reduction factor Leff [6.4.(1)] Leff - Effective length of web [6..(1)] FRd - Web resistance for local buckling [6..(1)] Sigx.Ed - Local stresses due to moment and axial force [E 1993-1-1 &6..1.(5)] Sigz.Ed - Local stresses due to transversal load [E 1993-1-1 &6..1.(5)] Tau.Ed - Shear stress under a concentrated force [E 1993-1-1 &6..1.(5)] Web stability under force FEd,1 Point x = 1.0 m ss = 0 mm m1 = 0.69 m = 0.00 kf = 6.00 LamF = 0.47 Xf = 1.00 Leff = 331 mm Frd = 161.3 k FEd,1 = 185.00 k < FRd = 161.3 k Interaction of transversal force, moment and axial force (EC3 section 7..(1)) Check condition: (7.) = 0.13 < 1.4 Web in plane stress (EC3 art. 6..1.(5)) Sigx,Ed = -4.75 MPa Sigx,Ed = 167.88 MPa Tau,Ed = 0.00 MPa Check condition: (E 1993-1-1 &6..1.(5)) (Sigx.Ed/(fy/g0))^ + (Sigz.Ed/(fy/g0))^ - (Sigx.Ed/(fy/g0))*(Sigz.Ed/(fy/g0)) + 3.0*(Tau,Ed/(fy/g0))^ = 0.5 < 1.0 Web stability under force FEd, Point x =.67 m ss = 0 mm m1 = 0.69 m = 0.00 kf = 6.00 LamF = 0.47 Xf = 1.00 Leff = 331 mm Frd = 161.3 k FEd, = 665.85 k < FRd = 161.3 k Interaction of transversal force, moment and axial force (EC3 section 7..(1)) Check condition: (7.) = 0.57 < 1.4 Web stability under force FEd,3 Point x = 3.0 m ss = 0 mm m1 = 0.69 m = 0.00 kf = 6.00 LamF = 0.47 Xf = 1.00 Leff = 331 mm Frd = 161.3 k FEd,3 = 357.00 k < FRd = 161.3 k Interaction of transversal force, moment and axial force (EC3 section 7..(1)) Check condition: (7.)

= 0.6 < 1.4 Web in plane stress (EC3 art. 6..1.(5)) Sigx,Ed = -17.76 MPa Sigx,Ed = 33.96 MPa Tau,Ed = 0.00 MPa Check condition: (E 1993-1-1 &6..1.(5)) (Sigx.Ed/(fy/g0))^ + (Sigz.Ed/(fy/g0))^ - (Sigx.Ed/(fy/g0))*(Sigz.Ed/(fy/g0)) + 3.0*(Tau,Ed/(fy/g0))^ = 0.97 < 1.0 Web stability under force FEd,4 Point x = 4.40 m ss = 0 mm m1 = 0.69 m = 0.00 kf = 6.00 LamF = 0.47 Xf = 1.00 Leff = 331 mm Frd = 161.3 k FEd,4 = 400.65 k < FRd = 161.3 k Interaction of transversal force, moment and axial force (EC3 section 7..(1)) Check condition: (7.) = 0.6 < 1.4 Web in plane stress (EC3 art. 6..1.(5)) Sigx,Ed = -6.81 MPa Sigx,Ed = 363.57 MPa Tau,Ed = 0.00 MPa Check condition: (E 1993-1-1 &6..1.(5)) (Sigx.Ed/(fy/g0))^ + (Sigz.Ed/(fy/g0))^ - (Sigx.Ed/(fy/g0))*(Sigz.Ed/(fy/g0)) + 3.0*(Tau,Ed/(fy/g0))^ = 1.18 > 1.0 ICORRECT Web stability under force FEd,5 Point x = 5.95 m ss = 0 mm m1 = 0.69 m = 0.00 kf = 6.00 LamF = 0.47 Xf = 1.00 Leff = 331 mm Frd = 161.3 k FEd,5 = 400.65 k < FRd = 161.3 k Interaction of transversal force, moment and axial force (EC3 section 7..(1)) Check condition: (7.) = 0.6 < 1.4 Web in plane stress (EC3 art. 6..1.(5)) Sigx,Ed = -6.81 MPa Sigx,Ed = 363.57 MPa Tau,Ed = 0.00 MPa Check condition: (E 1993-1-1 &6..1.(5)) (Sigx.Ed/(fy/g0))^ + (Sigz.Ed/(fy/g0))^ - (Sigx.Ed/(fy/g0))*(Sigz.Ed/(fy/g0)) + 3.0*(Tau,Ed/(fy/g0))^ = 1.18 > 1.0 ICORRECT Web stability under force FEd,6 Point x = 7.15 m ss = 0 mm m1 = 0.69 m = 0.00 kf = 6.00 LamF = 0.47 Xf = 1.00 Leff = 331 mm Frd = 161.3 k FEd,6 = 357.00 k < FRd = 161.3 k Interaction of transversal force, moment and axial force (EC3 section 7..(1)) Check condition: (7.) = 0.6 < 1.4 Web in plane stress (EC3 art. 6..1.(5)) Sigx,Ed = -17.76 MPa Sigx,Ed = 33.96 MPa Tau,Ed = 0.00 MPa Check condition: (E 1993-1-1 &6..1.(5)) (Sigx.Ed/(fy/g0))^ + (Sigz.Ed/(fy/g0))^ - (Sigx.Ed/(fy/g0))*(Sigz.Ed/(fy/g0)) + 3.0*(Tau,Ed/(fy/g0))^ = 0.97 < 1.0 Web stability under force FEd,7 Point x = 7.67 m

ss = 0 mm m1 = 0.69 m = 0.00 kf = 6.00 LamF = 0.47 Xf = 1.00 Leff = 331 mm Frd = 161.3 k FEd,7 = 665.85 k < FRd = 161.3 k Interaction of transversal force, moment and axial force (EC3 section 7..(1)) Check condition: (7.) = 0.57 < 1.4 Web stability under force FEd,8 Point x = 9.15 m ss = 0 mm m1 = 0.69 m = 0.00 kf = 6.00 LamF = 0.47 Xf = 1.00 Leff = 331 mm Frd = 161.3 k FEd,8 = 185.00 k < FRd = 161.3 k Interaction of transversal force, moment and axial force (EC3 section 7..(1)) Check condition: (7.) = 0.13 < 1.4 Web in plane stress (EC3 art. 6..1.(5)) Sigx,Ed = -4.75 MPa Sigx,Ed = 167.88 MPa Tau,Ed = 0.00 MPa Check condition: (E 1993-1-1 &6..1.(5)) (Sigx.Ed/(fy/g0))^ + (Sigz.Ed/(fy/g0))^ - (Sigx.Ed/(fy/g0))*(Sigz.Ed/(fy/g0)) + 3.0*(Tau,Ed/(fy/g0))^ = 0.5 < 1.0 ITERACTIO SHEAR/BEDIG/AXIAL FORCE (EC3 art. 7.1) My,Ed - Design bending moment Mz,Ed - Design bending moment Ed - Design axial force VEd - Design shear force Mf.Rd - Design plastic moment resistance of a section consisting of flanges [7.1.(1)] My,pl.Rd - Design beam resistance at bending [7.1.(1)] Vb.Rd - Design shear buckling resistance [5..(1)] Panel A Panel coordinates A x = (0.00 ; 1.00) Point x = 7.4 m According to [7.1.(1)] checking of TM interaction is not necessary (VEd/Vb,Rd < 0.5 ); STABILITY OF COMPRESSIVE FLAGE (EC3 art. 8.1) k - Factor depending on section class [8.(1)] Aw - Area of stiffener [8.(1)] Afc - Area of compressive flange [8.(1)] k = 0.30 Aw = 6438 mm Afc = 8400 mm Check condition: (8.1) D/tw = 30.6 < k(e/fyf)*[aw/afc]^0.5 = 155.36 Analyzed beam does not meet the Eurocode 3 requirements