Nutrient Recommendations for Russet Burbank Potatoes in Southern Alberta

Similar documents
Nutrient status of potatoes grown on compost amended soils as determined by sap nitrate levels.

Sugar Beet Petiole Tests as a Measure Of Soil Fertility

N Management in Potato Production. David Mulla, Carl Rosen, Tyler Nigonand Brian Bohman Dept. Soil, Water & Climate University of Minnesota

Volume XVII, Number July Chasing Petioles

Remote Sensing as a Tool to Manage Nitrogen for Irrigated Potato Production

Response of Russet Potato to Source and Rate of Phosphorus Fertilizer Application

PURPOSE To develop a strategy for deriving a map of functional soil water characteristics based on easily obtainable land surface observations.

Evaluation of rapid field methods for determining the nitrogen status of potato crops

Christopher ISU

VEGETABLE CULTIVAR AND CULTURAL TRIALS 2009

viti-notes [grapevine nutrition] Petiole analysis

VitiNotes. Grapevine nutrition 3: Petiole analysis

CRITICAL PETIOLE POTASSIUM LEVELS AS RELATED TO PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSES OF CHAMBER- GROWN COTTON TO POTASSIUM DEFICIENCY

Climate Change Impact on Air Temperature, Daily Temperature Range, Growing Degree Days, and Spring and Fall Frost Dates In Nebraska

Cereal Staging Guide

An Online Platform for Sustainable Water Management for Ontario Sod Producers

Major Nutrients Trends and some Statistics

September 2018 Weather Summary West Central Research and Outreach Center Morris, MN

November 2018 Weather Summary West Central Research and Outreach Center Morris, MN

Variability of Reference Evapotranspiration Across Nebraska

List of Equipment, Tools, Supplies, and Facilities:

Impact on Agriculture

3 Numbers in parentheses refer to literature cited.

Leaf Wetting and Uptake of Fluid Foliar P Fertilizers for Wheat

Garden Mum Crop Scheduling October 3, 2018 Mark Smith

plant physiology and energy conversion to plant systems. identify the components and the functions of plant describe the processes of

Lassen Community College Course Outline

EVALUATiON OF YUKON HERBICIDE RATES FOR YELLOW NUTSEDGE CONTROL IN CORN GROWN IN ROTATIONS FOLLOWED BY ONION

Yuma County Broccoli Trials,

Development and Test of Potassium Management Algorithms for Corn. Ron Potok (Solum), Kyle Freeman (Mosaic), and Scott Murrell (IPNI) Project Summary:

Flower Species as a Supplemental Source of Pollen for Honey Bees (Apis mellifera) in Late Summer Cropping Systems

2018 // Potato // HARS // CPB Systemic Trial Pg. 1

Trial Report: Slicing Cucumber Variety Evaluation Spring 2014

Soil Moisture Probe Newsletter: October 2015

Dr. S.S. Pandey Director

AGRONOMIC POTENTIAL AND LIMITATIONS OF USING PRECIPITATED CALCIUM CARBONATE IN THE HIGH PLAINS

carbon dioxide +... (+ light energy) glucose +...

Plants can be either herbaceous or woody.

those in Arizona. This period would extend through the fall equinox (September 23, 1993). Thus, pending variation due to cloudiness, total light flux

Growth Stages of Wheat: Identification and Understanding Improve Crop Management

Communicating Climate Change Consequences for Land Use

Effect of Leaf Removal and Tie-up on Transplanted Large Mexican Fan Palms (Washingtonia robusta)

2012 Growing Season. Niagara Report. Wayne Heinen

YELLOW NUTSEDGE CONTROL IN VARIOUS CROPS

FINAL REPORT TO MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT HORT FUND PROJECT FY 2015

Research Note COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR ESTIMATING CROP EVAPOTRANSPIRATION IN PUERTO RICO 1,2. J. Agric. Univ. P.R. 89(1-2): (2005)

CERAIDE FOR USE AS AN AGRICULTURAL PLANT GROWTH REGULATOR FOR PROFESSIONAL USE ONLY

NIDIS Intermountain West Drought Early Warning System August 8, 2017

THE GREENHOUSE EFFECT

Teacher s Discussion Notes Part 1

W285. Matthew S. Wiggins Graduate Research Assistant Department of Plant Sciences. C. Owen Gwathmey Professor Emeritus Department of Plant Sciences

LEDStorm Grow Spectrum Light (with EMS Technology) Light Comparison Testing Spokane, WA. A New Natural Approach to Lighting.

Proline Fungicide on Corn Silage to Reduce Mycotoxins

GREEN LIFE. Plants and Photosynthesis W 398

The World Bank Second Rural Transport Improvement Project (P123828)

USDA FOREST SERVICE RESEARCH NOTE NE-198

A Level. A Level Biology. AQA, OCR, Edexcel. Photosynthesis, Respiration Succession and Nutrient Cycle Questions. Name: Total Marks: Page 1

3. Potato / HARS / CPB Systemic Trial

The Climate of Bryan County

YELLOW NUTSEDGE CONTROL IN ONION AFTER THREE YEARS OF CORN HERBICIDES

Grapevine Nutrition: Results of Tissue and Soil Analyses

Regional Variability in Crop Specific Synoptic Forecasts

The Agriculture Investment and Market Development Project (P143417)

Earth Has a Rich Diversity of Plants. Plant Structure, Nutrition, and Transport. Angiosperms: Monocots and Dicots. Angiosperms: Dicots

Use of the Chlorophyll Meter to Guide In-season Nitrogen Fertilizer Applications in Irrigated Cotton

KANSAS CLIMATE SUMMARY August 2015

Range Cattle Research and Education Center January CLIMATOLOGICAL REPORT 2012 Range Cattle Research and Education Center.

Streamflow, Sediment, and Nutrient Simulation of the Bitterroot Watershed using SWAT

2014 Evaluation of Non Irrigated Mid to Full Season Maturing Cotton Varieties, Jay, Florida

What is insect forecasting, and why do it

The effect of phosphorus concentration on the growth of Salvinia minima Chesa Ramacciotti

Evaluation of Fall Application of Dual Magnum for Control of Yellow Nutsedge in Onions Grown on Muck Soils

Trends in Frost Dates, Frost Free Duration and Seasonal Temperature on the Canadian Prairie

THEME: Seasonal forecast: Climate Service for better management of risks and opportunities

The World Bank. Key Dates. Project Development Objectives. Components. Overall Ratings. Public Disclosure Authorized

Climate Change in the Inland Pacific Northwest

Water Potential. The physical property predicting the direction in which water will flow. Pressure

US Drought Status. Droughts 1/17/2013. Percent land area affected by Drought across US ( ) Dev Niyogi Associate Professor Dept of Agronomy

Corey V. Ransom, Charles A. Rice, and Joey K. Ishida Malheur Experiment Station Oregon State University Ontario, OR, 2004.

Adapt-N: A Cloud Computational Tool for Precision Nitrogen Management. AFRI Project Overview. Harold van Es

5 th Inquiry Review 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007, , 2004, 2003

Agronomy at scale Principles and approaches with examples from

Crop / Weather Update

The Colorado Agricultural no Meteorological Network (CoAgMet) and Crop ET Reports

Partnerships Implementing Engineering Education Worcester Polytechnic Institute Worcester Public Schools

WeatherManager Weekly

2014 Evaluation of Non Irrigated Early Maturing Cotton Varieties, Jay, Florida

AGR1006. Assessment of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungal Inoculants for Pulse Crop Production Systems

Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department UC Davis One Shields Ave. Davis, CA (530)

Appearance and growth of individual leaves in the canopies of several potato cultivars

Volume XIV, Number 1 January 6, 2014

Prediction of leaf number by linear regression models in cassava

Effect of El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) on the number of leaching rain events in Florida and implications on nutrient management

but 2012 was dry Most farmers pulled in a crop

Foliar Application of 2,4-D Reduces Damage to Potato Tubers by Common Scab

Title Sorghum/Cotton Rotation under Extreme Deficit Irrigation Conditions. Location Texas Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Halfway, TX

MARKET WIRE. Jason Vollmer (701) Trygg Olson (701) Nick Smith (701) Adam Allmaras (701)

Effect of Weather Parameters on Population Dynamics of Paddy Pests

Plant Water Stress Frequency and Periodicity in Western North Dakota

Module 3, Investigation 1: Briefing 2 The ENSO game: Predicting and managing for El Niño and La Niña

Transcription:

Revised May 2011 Agdex 258/541-1 Nutrient Recommendations for Russet Burbank Potatoes in Southern Alberta Precise fertilizer application rates are critical for optimal potato production. Sufficient nutrients are needed to maximize tuber yield, quality and uniformity. However, too much fertilizer means unnecessary costs for the producer and potential harm to the environment. Potato petiole (stalk between leaf and stem) sample analysis has been used to monitor the nutrient status of potato crops throughout the growing season. This technique can be useful and timely for monitoring any mid-season crop deficiencies, ones that were not identified in spring soil samples. The current recommended petiole nutrient (NO 3 -N, P and K) concentrations used in Alberta have come from research conducted in the northwest United States, where longer growing seasons and different soil conditions and climate prevail. Petiole analysis results from previous Russet Burbank studies in southern Alberta have shown that the current recommendations based on USA research may need fine tuning to suit southern Alberta growing conditions. This concern led to a project to determine optimal petiole nutrient recommendations for Russet Burbank potatoes grown in southern Alberta. The analysis focused on the rates of nitrate nitrogen (NO 3 -N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K). As this factsheet explains, optimal petiole nutrient concentration ranges for southern Alberta have been developed based on this research. The research Nutrients are needed to maximize tuber yield, quality and uniformity. Experimental design Ten rates of N, P and K fertilizers were surface-applied in April 2004, 2005 and 2007 to strips in a small portion of fields of grower-managed Russet Burbank potatoes in southern Alberta. The 10 treatments consisted of four increasing rates each of N, P and K fertilizer while the other nutrients were held constant. In 2004 and 2005, each treatment plot was 8 rows wide (24 ft) and 115 ft long. In 2007, each treatment plot was 6 rows wide (18 ft) and 115 ft long. All plots ran adjacent to a pivot road. There were a total of four randomized replications of the experiment. Petiole sampling Petiole samples were collected and analyzed for each plot on seven dates in each of the three years of the study, beginning in late June and finishing in late August. The fourth leaf stem (petiole) from the top of the main stem was taken, and leaflets were removed in the field (see Figure 1).

petiole a) b) Figure 1. Russet Burbank fourth leaf stem a) before and b) after removal of leaves (petiole shown in dashed circle). Approximately 80 petioles were collected from each plot, at each sampling date. Staff were instructed to sample representative plants only and to avoid any unhealthy or overly advanced plants. Petiole samples were collected between 8 a.m. and 11 a.m. and were kept in a cooler and then air-dried overnight (at 45-50 C). Samples were ground and sent to a laboratory for analysis of the nitrate nitrogen (NO 3 -N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K). Tuber harvest Tuber samples (2 x 25 ft strips) were collected in mid- to late September using a two-row harvester. In the laboratory, samples were washed, graded and weighed to calculate total yield, marketable yield, mean tuber weight and per cent smalls. Grading categories used were small (<1 7 / 8 in), medium (1 7 / 8 3½ in), over-size (> 3½ in) and deformed. Marketable yield was defined as total yield minus yield of small tubers. Critical petiole nutrient concentrations To determine the optimal petiole nutrient concentrations, a curve was fitted to the yield versus petiole nutrient relationship, and the petiole concentration at the maximum yield value for the curve was called the 100% relative yield petiole concentration (100%RY). The maximum yield was multiplied by 0.9 to calculate the 90% relative yield. The corresponding petiole nutrient concentration (90%RY) was calculated for each petiole sampling date. The petiole nutrient concentrations at 100% and 90% relative yields were plotted as a function of the days after planting (DAP) for each corresponding sampling date (Figure 2). These plots indicate the optimal ranges for petiole nutrients throughout the growing season, with the 100%RY representing the upper limit of the range and the 90%RY representing the lower limit. Specific gravity was calculated with the weight in air divided by weight in water method on 25 medium tubers for each sample. 2

a) Nitrate Nitrogen (ppm) 30000 Petiole NO 3-N (ppm) 25000 20000 15000 10000 5000 0 b) Phosphorus (%) 0.6 Petiole P (%) 0.4 0.2 0.0 c) Potassium (%) 16 Petiole K (%) 12 8 4 0 Figure 2. Suggested Russet Burbank petiole nutrient (NO 3 -N, P and K) concentration recommendations. Based on information from southern Alberta (Alberta Optimal), experimental data and current petiole nutrient concentration recommendations, which are based on information from the northwest United States (NW USA Standards). The results The values of 100%RY and 90%RY were compared to days after planting (DAP) for all three years combined to determine optimal petiole nutrient concentrations specific for southern Alberta (Figure 2). It is important to remember that these upper and lower limits are for optimal yield (90-100% of relative yield) of Russet Burbank potatoes and are merely guidelines (Table 1). Actual petiole nutrient concentrations will be affected by genotype, climate, irrigation amount, soil type, planting date, petiole sample collection technique and laboratory analysis. 3

Table 1. Suggested optimal Russet Burbank petiole nutrient (NO 3 -N, P, and K) contents based on information from southern Alberta (2004, 2005 and 2007) Days after planting (DAP) Optimal petiole nutrient concentrations NO 3 -N (ppm) P (%) K (%) 90%RY 100%RY 90%RY 100%RY 90%RY 100%RY 60 13000 21400 0.15 0.43 7.3 12.4 65 11550 19950 0.15 0.41 6.6 11.6 70 10100 18500 0.14 0.40 5.9 10.7 75 8650 17050 0.14 0.38 5.2 9.9 80 7200 15600 0.13 0.37 4.5 9 85 12978 20378 0.13 0.35 8.8 14.1 90 11756 19156 0.13 0.34 7.9 13.2 95 10533 17933 0.12 0.32 7.1 12.4 100 9311 16711 0.12 0.31 6.2 11.5 105 8089 15489 0.12 0.29 5.4 10.6 110 6867 14267 0.11 0.28 4.5 9.7 115 5644 13044 0.11 0.26 3.7 8.9 120 4422 11822 0.10 0.25 2.8 8 125 3200 10600 0.10 0.23 2.0 7.1 Nitrate Nitrogen (NO3-N) The suggested optimal petiole NO 3 -N concentrations are quite similar to the current NW USA standards, especially for greater than 80 DAP. It is suggested that there should be two sets of ranges, one set for prior to and including approximately 80 DAP and another set for after approximately 80 DAP. Phosphorus (P) The suggested optimal petiole P concentrations are substantially lower than the current NW USA standards, particularly early in the growing season. Potassium (K) The suggested optimal petiole K concentrations have a wider range than the current NW USA standards. Similar to NO 3 -N, it is suggested that there be two sets of ranges of petiole K concentrations, one set for prior to approximately 80 DAP and another set for after approximately 80 DAP. Effects of Climate Although it was not a part of the initial objectives of the project, the effects of climate were examined using data from previously completed Potato Growers of Albertasponsored studies done between 1997 and 2001 and using data from this study (2004, 2005 and 2007). In years when June and July are hotter than average, petiole NO 3 -N concentrations may be greater than usual at the start of the measuring dates and may decrease at a greater rate than in cooler years. This result may be due to the plant growing faster in hotter June-July weather and being unable to sustain sufficient rates of nitrogen uptake, or it may be an artefact of heat stress. The potential effects of climate reinforce the notion that petiole nutrient recommendations should be treated as guidelines only that will be affected by climate, soil and other environmental factors, as well as by human factors. The conclusions New optimal petiole nutrient concentration ranges for optimal marketable yield have been developed specific to Russet Burbank potatoes grown in southern Alberta s soil and climatic conditions (shown in Table 1). These proposed optimal petiole nutrient concentrations were compared to data collected in previously completed studies and were found to be valid. Nitrogen The suggested petiole nitrate nitrogen range is slightly lower than the northwest USA standards at the beginning of the growing season (DAP < 80) and late in the growing season (DAP > 105). 4

Phosphorus The revised optimal petiole phosphorus ranges are substantially lower than the northwest USA standards. growers and processors, continue to refine these recommendations based on the petiole nutrient concentrations they observe currently and in the future. Potassium The recommended petiole potassium ranges are wider than the northwest USA standards overall and are similar early in the growing season (DAP < 80). Later in the growing season, the upper limits of the new petiole potassium recommendations are greater than for the northwest USA standards. Producers and agrologists can use these petiole nutrient recommendations along with their petiole sample laboratory results to make decisions about in-season fertilizer requirements. The new suggested optimal ranges should be considered as guidelines only and should be viewed in the context of previous years data from any given site. Petiole nutrient concentrations will be affected by many factors in addition to available soil nutrients. Some of these factors include temperature, precipitation, soil texture and other environmental factors, as well as human factors such as petiole sampling technique, irrigation management, location of samples within the field and laboratory analysis. Petiole nutrient concentrations should be considered on a field-specific basis. Spatial variability exists across any field, so care must be taken to choose petioles from benchmark locations that are representative of the field, in terms of location and plant appearance. The conclusions drawn in this study are based on three years of experimental data (2004, 2005 and 2007), and it is suggested that the Potato Growers of Alberta, along with Acknowledgements Petiole nutrient recommendations are affected by climate, soil, environmental and human factors, so should be used as guidelines only. This project was made possible with the financial support of the Potato Growers of Alberta (PGA) and Alberta Agriculture and Rural Development. The PGA also provided equipment, manpower and expertise to assist with the tuber harvest. McCain Foods provided funding to allow an additional petiole sampling to be added each year of the study. Sandberg Laboratories Ltd. provided a discounted analysis rate. Jerry Zeinstra, Greg Nakamura and Tony Bos are kindly acknowledged for hosting the trials. Prepared by For more information, contact Alberta Ag-Info Centre Call toll-free 310-FARM (3276) Website: www.agriculture.alberta.ca Shelley Woods, Soil and Water Research Scientist, Leonard Hingley, Soil and Water Technologist, Irrigation and Farm Water Division Michele Konschuh, Potato Research Scientist, Agriculture Research Division Alberta Agriculture and Rural Development 05/11/100 5