Appendix A. City of Colusa Sanitary Sewer Flow Monitoring and Inflow/Infiltration Study

Similar documents
Sanitary Sewer Flow Monitoring and Inflow/Infiltration Study

WASTEWATER FLOW COMPONENTS

Flow Monitoring in the Collection System September 11, 2014

Estimating Sewage System Flows

PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT FOR SANITARY SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM OSKALOOSA, IOWA 2017

Inflow and Infiltration. John Sorrell, P.E. City of Raleigh Public Utilities Department

WEST NORRITON TOWNSHIP

Regression Analysis of the Variation in Rainfall Derived Inflow and Infiltration

Sanitary Sewer Flow Monitoring Study City of Grandville

Typical Hydrologic Period Report (Final)

The City of Clearwater (City) collection

Technical Memorandum. City of Salem, Stormwater Management Design Standards. Project No:

Clark Regional Wastewater District

2012 Rainfall, Runoff, Water Level & Temperature Beebe Lake Wright County, MN (# )

Climate Adaptation Challenges for Boston s Water and Sewer Systems

CHAPTER 4 CRITICAL GROWTH SEASONS AND THE CRITICAL INFLOW PERIOD. The numbers of trawl and by bag seine samples collected by year over the study

Technical Memorandum. Bryan Foster City of Manassas Manassas, VA Date: January 18, Subject: Micron Pond Odor Evaluation

PRELIMINARY DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES

CSO Post-Construction Monitoring and Performance Assessment

January 22, Coronado National Forest 300 West Congress Street Tucson, AZ Jim Upchurch, Forest Supervisor. Dear Mr.

9. PROBABLE MAXIMUM PRECIPITATION AND PROBABLE MAXIMUM FLOOD

February 10, Mr. Jeff Smith, Chairman Imperial Valley Water Authority E County Road 1000 N Easton, IL Dear Chairman Smith:

SYSTEM BRIEF DAILY SUMMARY

WHEN IS IT EVER GOING TO RAIN? Table of Average Annual Rainfall and Rainfall For Selected Arizona Cities

Rainfall Observations in the Loxahatchee River Watershed

Nine Minimum Controls No. 2

Chiang Rai Province CC Threat overview AAS1109 Mekong ARCC

The University of Akron. William Troyer The Dr. Gary B. and Pamela S. Williams Honors College

3301 East 120 th Avenue Assited Living & Memory Care

VILLAGE COUNCIL STORMWATER REPORT JULY 23, 2016 STORM EVENT

Scattergraph Principles and Practice Evaluating Self-Cleansing in Existing Sewers Using the Tractive Force Method

SYSTEM BRIEF DAILY SUMMARY

REGULATORY, TECHNICAL AND MODELING CHALLENGES TO DEVELOPING A FREQUENCY BASED SSO CONTROL PROJECT IN WAYNE COUNTY, MICHIGAN

SANITARY SEWER EVALUATION OF INFLOW/INFILTRATION REDUCTION TECHNIQUES. Geoffrey Trent VanAllen. A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of

2018 FINAL TOWN OF WAXHAW WASTEWATER SYSTEM PLANNING. Master Plan Addendum. Union County B&V PROJECT NO PREPARED FOR

Clark Regional Wastewater District

Memo. I. Executive Summary. II. ALERT Data Source. III. General System-Wide Reporting Summary. Date: January 26, 2009 To: From: Subject:

Pressure Head: Pressure head is the height of a column of water that would exert a unit pressure equal to the pressure of the water.

Design Storms for Hydrologic Analysis

SOUTH MOUNTAIN WEATHER STATION: REPORT FOR QUARTER 2 (APRIL JUNE) 2011

Project Appraisal Guidelines

HYDROLOGIC AND WATER RESOURCES EVALUATIONS FOR SG. LUI WATERSHED

International Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Research

MAPPING THE RAINFALL EVENT FOR STORMWATER QUALITY CONTROL

3.0 TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY

Application of Real-Time Rainfall Information System to CSO control. 2 October 2011 Naruhito Funatsu METAWATER Co., Ltd.

2015 Fall Conditions Report

WEEKEND WEATHER OUTLOOK BELIZE, CENTRAL AMERICA

Section 2 Rainfall and Climatic Data

Table of Contents. Page

Eastlake Assited Living & Memory Care

Sediment Trap. At multiple locations within the project site where sediment control is needed.

2017 Fall Conditions Report

PH YSIC A L PROPERT IE S TERC.UCDAVIS.EDU

Weather and Climate of the Rogue Valley By Gregory V. Jones, Ph.D., Southern Oregon University

Impact of climate change on CSOs and SSOs in Milwaukee Watersheds

Impact of Inflow and Infiltration on Wastewater Assets

Solution: The ratio of normal rainfall at station A to normal rainfall at station i or NR A /NR i has been calculated and is given in table below.

Summary of the 2017 Spring Flood

MODRET SUMMARY OF UNSATURATED & SATURATED INPUT PARAMETERS. PROJECT NAME : Wetland M POLLUTION VOLUME RUNOFF DATA USED UNSATURATED ANALYSIS INCLUDED

UTILITY REPORT FOR THORNTON SELF STORAGE THORNTON, COLORADO

Project No India Basin Shadow Study San Francisco, California, USA

Sewer, pressurization, differential pressure monitoring, fully dynamic hydraulic modeling, air displacement modeling.

NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE

Hydrology and Hydraulics Design Report. Background Summary

Mountain View Community Shuttle Monthly Operations Report

Hydrology Study Report

Chapter 5 CALIBRATION AND VERIFICATION

January 25, Summary

Appendix D. Model Setup, Calibration, and Validation

PREDICTING SOIL SUCTION PROFILES USING PREVAILING WEATHER

The Climate of Payne County

2016 Fall Conditions Report

The Climate of Marshall County

The Climate of Seminole County

City of Thornton Attn: Tim Semones Development Engineeering 9500 Civic Center Dr. Thornton, CO 80229

Monitoring Considerations and Costs

Lower Tuolumne River Accretion (La Grange to Modesto) Estimated daily flows ( ) for the Operations Model Don Pedro Project Relicensing

Section 4: Model Development and Application

Great Lakes Update. Volume 194: 2015 Annual Summary

ENGINEERING HYDROLOGY

The Climate of Murray County

UNITED STATES AND SOUTH AMERICA SNAPSHOT REPORT Wednesday, December 20, 2017

Attachment B to Technical Memorandum No.2. Operations Plan of Ross Valley Detention Basins

The Climate of Haskell County

Extreme Rain all Frequency Analysis for Louisiana

The Climate of Grady County

Implementing a Thermal Urban Runoff Model (TURM)

Status Report on Polychlorinated Biphenyls in the Western Storm Drain University of California, Richmond Field Station Richmond, California

HyMet Company. Streamflow and Energy Generation Forecasting Model Columbia River Basin

HOTEL KANATA 160 HEARST WAY KANATA, ONTARIO SERVICING REPORT. Prepared for: David Johnston Architect. Prepared By:

UNITED STATES AND SOUTH AMERICA WEATHER ROUNDUP Sunday, December 17, 2017

DELINEATION OF A POTENTIAL GASEOUS ELEMENTAL MERCURY EMISSIONS SOURCE IN NORTHEASTERN NEW JERSEY SNJ-DEP-SR11-018

BRANDON LAKES AVENUE PRE AND POST CONDITIONS DRAINAGE REPORT

PHYSICAL PROPERTIES TAHOE.UCDAVIS.EDU 8

UNITED STATES AND SOUTH AMERICA SNAPSHOT REPORT Thursday, December 21, 2017

WEEKLY WEATHER OUTLOOK BELIZE, CENTRAL AMERICA

Analysis of meteorological measurements made over three rainy seasons in Sinazongwe District, Zambia.

Stream Discharge and the Water Budget

A Synoptic Climatology of Heavy Precipitation Events in California

Transcription:

Appendix A City of Colusa Sanitary Sewer Flow Monitoring and Inflow/Infiltration Study

Site 3 Site 4 Site 5 Site 2 Site 1 SANITARY SEWER FLOW MONITORING AND INFLOW / INFILTRATION STUDY City of Colusa April 2008

CITY OF COLUSA Sanitary Sewer Flow Monitoring and Inflow / Infiltration Study Prepared For: ECO: LOGIC CONSULTING ENGINEERS 3875 Atherton Road Rocklin, CA 94064 Prepared By: V&A Lake Merritt Plaza 1999 Harrison Street, Suite 975 Oakland, CA 94612 April 2008

Sanitary Sewer Flow Monitoring and I/I Report TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION PAGE NO. 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 1 1.1 Flow Monitoring and I/I Results... 1 2 INTRODUCTION... 4 3 METHODS AND PROCEDURES... 5 3.1 Confined Space Entry... 5 3.2 Flow Meter Installation... 6 4 RAINFALL RESULTS... 7 5 STORM EVENT CLASSIFICATION... 9 6 FLOW MONITORING RESULTS... 12 6.1 Dry Weather Flow Monitoring Results... 12 6.2 Ground Water Infiltration Analysis... 14 6.3 Wet Weather Flow Monitoring Results... 16 6.3.1 Inflow/Infiltration Methods... 16 6.3.2 I/I Analysis Techniques... 19 6.3.3 I/I Results Summary... 20 6.4 Pipeline Capacity Analysis... 21 6.5 Synthetic Hydrographs... 23 6.6 Design Storm... 24 7 RECOMMENDATIONS... 26 TABLES Table 1-1 Flow Monitoring and I/I Results Summary... 1 Table 1-2 10-Year, 24-Hour Design Storm Response Summary... 3 Table 5-1 Peak Measured Rainfall Densities per Hourly Period (January 3-4, 2008)... 10 Table 6-1 Dry Weather Flow Summary... 13 Table 6-2 Site I/I Summary... 20 Table 6-3 d/d Ratio Analysis Summary... 22 Table 6-4 10 Year, 24 Hour Design Storm Response Summary... 25 FIGURES Figure 1-1. Site Rankings: I/I Factors by Site... 1 Figure 1-2. Site Rankings: Capacity Factors by Site... 2 Figure 2-1. Vicinity Map of Flow Monitoring Locations... 4 Figure 3-1. Typical Isco 2150 Installation... 6 Figure 4-1. Rainfall Activity over Flow Monitoring Period... 7 Figure 4-2. Rainfall Accumulation Plots... 8 Figure 6-1. Site 3: Average Dry Weather Flow... 12 TOC

Sanitary Sewer Flow Monitoring and I/I Report Figure 6-2. Ground Water Infiltration Sample Figure... 14 Figure 6-3. Peak and Minimum Flow Ratios vs. ADWF... 15 Figure 6-4. Infiltration / Inflow Locations and Components... 17 Figure 6-5. Infiltration/Inflow Graphical Response Patterns... 18 Figure 6-6. Sample I/I Flow Graph... 20 Figure 6-7. Infiltration and Inflow Rankings: I/I Factors by Site... 21 Figure 6-8. Capacity Rankings: Peaking Factor and d/d Ratio by Site... 22 Figure 6-9. Site 3 Synthetic Hydrograph... 23 Figure 6-10. 10-Year, 24-Hour Design Storm Values... 24 Figure 6-11. Site 5: 10-Year, 24-Hour Design Storm Synthetic Hydrograph... 25 APPENDIX A. FLOW MONITORING SITES: DATA, GRAPHS, INFORMATION TOC

Sanitary Sewer Flow Monitoring and I/I Report 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY V&A Consulting Engineers (V&A) has completed sanitary sewer flow monitoring and inflow and infiltration (I/I) analysis at five locations within the City of Colusa (City) collection system. Flow monitoring was conducted over a 6-week period from February 14, 2008 to March 26, 2008. The flow monitoring sites are shown in Figure 2-1 on Page 4 of this report. 1.1 Flow Monitoring and I/I Results Table 1-1 summarizes the flow monitoring results and infiltration and inflow results for each flow monitoring site. The infiltration and inflow (I/I) results shown in this table are taken from the rainfall event which occurred from February 23, 2008 to February 24, 2008. Figure 1-1 and Figure 1-2 summarize various infiltration, inflow and capacity results graphically. Site Name ADWF* (MGD) Estimated Total I/I (MGD) Table 1-1 Flow Monitoring and I/I Results Summary R-Value (%) I/I per ADWF Method Peak Flow (MGD) Peak I/I Rate (MGD) Peak I/I to ADWF Peaking Factor Site 01 0.276 182,000 2.8% 7 0.769 0.386 1.40 2.79 7 Site 02 2 21,000 % 0.28 8 59 8 5 0.64 Site 03 0.199 97,000 1.7% 0.65 0.379 0.139 0.70 1.90 8 Site 04 77 64,000 1.6% 1.09 0.158 60 0.78 4 0.60 Site 05 30 13,000 1.0% 6 97 55 1.82 3.18 0.24 d/d Ratio 3.0% Infiltration 1.2 Inflow 2.5% System Average 1.0 1.8 1.6 R-Value, % % 1.5% 1.0% Total I&I to ADWF 0.6 Pk I&I to ADWF 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.6 % 0.2 0.2 % Site 1 Site 3 Site 4 Site 5 Site 2 Avg. Site 4 Site 1 Site 3 Site 5 Site 2 Avg. Site 5 Site 1 Site 4 Site 3 Site 2 Avg. Figure 1-1. Site Rankings: I/I Factors by Site Page 1

Sanitary Sewer Flow Monitoring and I/I Report 4.0 PF = 3.0 1.0 Peaking Factor (Peak Flow / ADWF) 3.5 3.0 2.5 1.5 1.0 d/d Ratio 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.1 Surcharge Condition Site 5 Site 1 Site 2 Site 4 Site 3 Avg. Site 2 Site 4 Site 3 Site 1 Site 5 Avg. Figure 1-2. Site Rankings: Capacity Factors by Site The following results from this project are noted: Groundwater Infiltration: Site 2 had min-to-baseline ratios that fell slightly outside of the typical min-to-baseline ratios as defined by WPCF. There may be slightly higher-than-normal groundwater infiltration occurring in the basins upstream from these sites during periods of dry weather flow. Infiltration: Sites 1, 3 and 4 had the highest ranked infiltration indicators (R-Value and I/I per ADWF Method). All sites had R-Values less than the 5% performance threshold during the February 23, 2008 to February 24, 2008 wet weather event. Inflow: Sites 1 and 5 had Peak I/I per ADWF Ratios that were greater than the system average. Capacity Peaking Factor: All sites, except Site 5, were below the typical design threshold limit for peak flow to average dry weather flow ratio. d/d Ratio: All sites, except Site 2, are below the typical design threshold limit for d/d ratio. Additional Notes: Site 2 appeared to be influenced by a sporadic back-flow condition as periodic jumps in level and dips in velocity were observed during rain-independent flows. There may be a hydraulic disturbance occurring downstream from Site 2 (i.e., influence by a larger line or pump station). This hydraulic backflow condition should be taken into consideration when reviewing capacity data at Site 2 versus the other flow monitoring locations Synthetic hydrographs were developed for each site and were applied to a 10-year, 24-hour design storm event appropriate to this geographical location. Table 1-2 summarizes the results of this analysis. Page 2

Sanitary Sewer Flow Monitoring and I/I Report Table 1-2 10-Year, 24-Hour Design Storm Response Summary Monitoring Site ADWF (MGD) Peak Flow (MGD) Peaking Factor Infiltration Site 01 0.27 2.27 8.34 825,000 Site 02 4 4.39 197,000 Site 03 0 3.95 208,000 Site 04 8 4 5.57 198,000 Site 05 3 6.74 104,000 V&A advises that future I/I reduction plans consider the following recommendations: 1. Determine I/I Reduction Program: The City should examine its I/I reduction needs to determine a future I/I reduction program. a. If peak flows, sanitary sewer overflows, and pipeline capacity issues are of greater concern, then the program can be weighted to investigate and reduce sources of inflow within the basins with the greatest inflow problems. b. If total infiltration and general pipeline deterioration is of greater concern, then the program can be weighted to investigate and reduce sources of infiltration within the basins with the greatest infiltration problems. 2. I/I Reduction Methods: Potential I/I reduction methods include the following: a. smoke testing b. mini-basin flow monitoring c. night-time reconnaissance work to (1) investigate and determine direct point sources of inflow, and (2) determine the areas and/or pipe reaches responsible for high levels of infiltration contribution. d. CCTV inspection 3. I/I Reduction Cost Effective Analysis: The City should conduct a study to determine which is more cost-effective: (1) locating the sources of infiltration and inflow and systematically rehabilitating or replacing the faulty pipelines; or (2) continued treatment of the additional storm water I/I flow. Page 3

Sanitary Sewer Flow Monitoring and I/I Report 2 INTRODUCTION V&A Consulting Engineers (V&A) has completed sanitary sewer flow monitoring and inflow and infiltration (I/I) analysis within the City of Colusa. Flow monitoring occurred over a 6-week period from February 14, 2008 to March 26, 2008 at five flow monitoring sites. The five flow monitoring sites are shown in Figure 2-1. Detailed descriptions of the individual flow monitoring sites, including photographs, are included in Appendix A. Site 3 Site 4 Site 5 Site 2 Site 1 Figure 2-1. Vicinity Map of Flow Monitoring Locations Page 4

Sanitary Sewer Flow Monitoring and I/I Report 3 METHODS AND PROCEDURES 3.1 Confined Space Entry A confined space (Photo 3.1) is defined as any space that is large enough and so configured that a person can bodily enter and perform assigned work, has limited or restricted means for entry or exit, and is not designed for continuous employee occupancy. Title 8, Section 5158 of the California Code of Regulations provides the guidelines and rules for working in these environments. In general, the atmosphere must be constantly monitored for sufficient levels of oxygen (19.5 to 23.0%), and the absence of Hydrogen Sulfide (H 2 S) gas, Carbon Monoxide (CO) gas, and LEL levels. A typical confined space entry crew has at least three members: the entrant, the attendant and the supervisor. The entrant is the individual that will be performing the work. He is equipped with all of the necessary personal protective equipment needed to perform the job safely, including a personal 4-gas monitor (Photo 3.2). If it is not possible to maintain line-of-sight with the entrant, then more entrants are required until line-of-sight can be maintained. The attendant is responsible for maintaining contact with the entrant(s) to monitor the atmosphere on another 4-gas monitor and maintaining records of all entrants, if there is more than one. The supervisor develops the safe work plan for the job at hand. Photo 3.1 Confined Space Entry Photo 3.2 Typical Personal 4-Gas Monitor Page 5

Sanitary Sewer Flow Monitoring and I/I Report 3.2 Flow Meter Installation Five Isco 2150 flow meters were installed by V&A in the sewer lines shown in Figure 2-1. Isco meters use a pressure transducer to collect depth readings, and ultrasonic Doppler sensors on the probe to determine the average fluid velocity. Figure 3-1 shows a sketch of a typical flow meter installation. Figure 3-1. Typical Isco 2150 Installation Continuous depth and velocity readings were recorded by the flow meters in 15-minute increments and downloaded into a computer spreadsheet program where the data could be analyzed and made report ready. Manual level and velocity readings were taken in the field during the flow meter installation and again when removed, and compared to the readings of the flow meters to ensure proper calibration and accuracy. Page 6

Sanitary Sewer Flow Monitoring and I/I Report 4 RAINFALL RESULTS Rainfall information was taken from a local rain gauge within the City of Colusa. The rain gauge was utilized to capture the rain events over the course of this study. Most of the rain over the course of this study occurred between February 19, 2008 to February 25, 2008. The greatest I/I response occurred between February 23 and 25, 2008, and this time period was used for I/I analysis. Figure 4-1 graphically displays the rainfall events recorded over the flow monitoring period. City of Colusa: Storm Events (February 13, 2008 - March 31, 2008) Total Rainfall over Period: 2.58 inches 0.18 0.16 2.46 Rain (inches per hour) 0.14 0.12 8 6 4 2 0 13-Feb 15-Feb 17-Feb 19-Feb 21-Feb 23-Feb 25-Feb 27-Feb 29-Feb 2-Mar 4-Mar 6-Mar 8-Mar 10-Mar 12-Mar 14-Mar 16-Mar 18-Mar 20-Mar 22-Mar 24-Mar 26-Mar 28-Mar 30-Mar Figure 4-1. Rainfall Activity over Flow Monitoring Period Figure 4-2 shows the rain accumulation plot of the rain gauge, as well as the historical average rainfall for the City during this project duration. Page 7

Sanitary Sewer Flow Monitoring and I/I Report City of Colusa (February 13, 2008 -March 31, 2008): Rain Accumulation Chart 5.0 Historical Average Colusa 4.0 4.25 Rain (inches) 3.0 2.58 1.0 13-Feb 15-Feb 17-Feb 19-Feb 21-Feb 23-Feb 25-Feb 27-Feb 29-Feb 2-Mar 4-Mar 6-Mar 8-Mar 10-Mar 12-Mar 14-Mar 16-Mar 18-Mar 20-Mar 22-Mar 24-Mar 26-Mar 28-Mar 30-Mar Figure 4-2. Rainfall Accumulation Plots The historical average rainfall is shown for comparison to the rainfall that occurred over the course of the flow monitoring period (February 13, 2008 through March 31, 2008). The historical data was taken from the Western Regional Climate Center (WRCC) at Station 041948 in Colusa, California. Rainfall data from the years 1970 through 2000 were used to determine these averages. The historical average over the monitoring period is 4.25 inches. The rain gauge indicated a rainfall total of 2.58 inches, approximately 61% of normal level during this time period. It is noted that significant storm events did occur in Colusa on January 3, 2008 through January 5, 2008 and January 21, 2008 through January 27, 2008. The soil conditions in Colusa may have been in a saturated state for the February 19, 2008 through February 25, 2008 rainfall event. Page 8

Sanitary Sewer Flow Monitoring and I/I Report 5 STORM EVENT CLASSIFICATION It is important to classify the relative size of the major storm event that occurs over the course of a flow monitoring period 1. Storm events are classified by intensity and duration. Based on historical data, frequency contour maps for given intensity and duration storm events have been developed by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) for all areas within the continental United States. For example, the NOAA Rainfall Frequency Atlas 2 classifies a 10-year, 24-hour storm event in Colusa as 2.75 inches (Figure 5-1). This means that in any given year, there is a 10% chance (1/10) 2.75 inches of rain will fall in any 24-hour period. Rainfall in Tenths of Inch Colusa Figure 5-1. NOAA Northern California Rainfall Frequency Map 1 Sanitary sewers are often designed to withstand I/I contribution to sanitary flows for specific sized design storm events. 2 NOAA Western U.S. Precipitation Frequency Maps Atlas 2, 1973 <http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/pcpnfreq.html>. Page 9

Sanitary Sewer Flow Monitoring and I/I Report From the NOAA frequency maps, the rainfall totals for Colusa for 1-hour, 6-hour and 24-hour period durations, and 2-year, 5-year, 10-year, 25-year, 50-year, and 100-year period intensities, were plotted to develop a rain event frequency map specific to Colusa, shown in Figure 5-2. 4.5 Inches of Rain 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 1.5 100 50 25 10 5 2 1.0 1 2 3 4 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 Duration (hours) Figure 5-2. City of Colusa Storm Event Classification Chart The highest rainfall in a 1-hour period was 0.17 inches, in any consecutive 6-hour period was 6 inches, and for any consecutive 12-hour period was 0.72 inches. Peak measured densities per hourly periods were calculated for the rainfall event, as summarized in Table 5-1. Superimposing the peak measured densities for the storm event on the Colusa Rainfall Storm Event Classification Chart will determine the classification of the storm event, shown in Figure 5-3. Table 5-1 Peak Measured Rainfall Densities per Hourly Period (January 3-4, 2008) Rainfall Duration Total Rainfall (inches) 1 hr 0.14 3 hr 0.34 6 hr 8 12 hr 0.72 18 hr 0.76 24 hr 0.95 Page 10

Sanitary Sewer Flow Monitoring and I/I Report Inches of Rain 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 1.5 February 19-24, 2008 Storm Event 100 50 25 10 5 2 1.0 1 2 3 4 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 Duration (hours) Figure 5-3. Project Storm Event Classification The storm event is classified as less than a two year storm event. Page 11

Sanitary Sewer Flow Monitoring and I/I Report 6 FLOW MONITORING RESULTS 6.1 Dry Weather Flow Monitoring Results Weekday and weekend flow patterns vary and must be separated when determining average dry weather flows. For this project, the following days were least affected by rainfall and were used to determine weekend and weekday average flows: Weekdays: March 10 14 Weekends: March 8 9, 15 16 Figure 6-1 shows a sample of the average dry weather flow graph that was generated for each flow monitoring site. Graphs for each site are located in Appendix A. 0.35 Weekday: Ave = MGD Peak = 0.29 MGD at 8:15 Weekend: Ave = MGD Peak = 0.32 MGD at 11:15 Weekday Weekend 0.25 0.15 5 0 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 00 Hour Figure 6-1. Site 3: Average Dry Weather Flow Table 6-1 lists the average dry weather flow (ADWF) and average peak dry weather flows (PDWF) recorded during this study for the sites that were directly monitored. Page 12

Sanitary Sewer Flow Monitoring and I/I Report Location Average Dry Weather Flow (MGD) Weekday Weekend Table 6-1 Dry Weather Flow Summary Weekend/ Weekday Ratio Average Peak Dry Weather Flow (MGD) PDWF/ADWF Ratio Weekday Weekend Weekday Weekend Site 01 0.272 0.287 1.05 0.399 60 1.47 1.60 Site 02 99 7 1.08 0.133 0.156 1.34 1.45 Site 03 2 0.193 0.96 0.291 6 1.44 1.59 Site 04 79 73 0.91 0.124 0.121 1.56 1.67 Site 05 30 30 0.99 48 54 1.56 1.80 Page 13

Sanitary Sewer Flow Monitoring and I/I Report 6.2 Ground Water Infiltration Analysis Dry weather (baseline) flow can be expected to have a predictable diurnal flow pattern. While each site is unique, experience has shown that, given a reasonable volume of flow and typical loading conditions, the daily peaks and lows fall into a predictable range when compared to the daily average flow. If a site has a large percentage of ground water infiltration occurring during the periods of dry weather flow measurement, the amplitudes of the peak and low flows will be dampened 3. Figure 6-2 shows a sample of two flow monitoring sites, both with nearly the same average daily flow, but with considerably different peak and low flows. In this sample case, Site B1 may have a considerable volume of ground water infiltration. West County Wastewater District: B1 and A9 Baseline Weekday Flows 0.6 Site A9 Site B1 Site B1 Baseline Weekday Flow: MGD Site A9 Baseline Weekday Flow: 0.28 MGD Flow N1 (MGD) 0.3 0.2 0.1 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 00 Hour Figure 6-2. Ground Water Infiltration Sample Figure It can be useful to compare the peak-to-baseline and low-to-baseline flow ratios for all flow metering sites. A site with abnormal ratios, and with no other reasons to suspect abnormal flow patterns (such as proximity to pump station, treatment facilities, etc.), has a distinct possibility of higher levels of ground water infiltration in comparison to the rest of the collection system. Figure 6-3 plots the peakto-baseline and min-to-baseline flow ratios against the baseline flows for all sites monitored during this study. The dotted line shows typical min-to-baseline flow ratios per the Water Pollution Control Federation 4. There are no established peak-to-baseline ratios, but a system trendline has been drawn to better distinguish sites that fall outside the system trends. The min-to-baseline ratio should be taken with more weight as low flows during early morning hours are generally more predictable than peak flows. 3 Theoretically imagining an extreme case, if there were 0.2 MGD of baseline flow and MGD of groundwater infiltration, the peaks and lows would be barely recognizable; the baseline flow would be nearly a straight line. 4 WPCF Manual of Practice No. 9 Design and Construction of Sanitary and Storm Sewers Page 14

Sanitary Sewer Flow Monitoring and I/I Report 1.8 System Peak-to-Average Trendline Maximum, 24 hr Minimum, 24 hr Peak and Minimum Flow Ratios 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.6 Site 2 ` ADWF = 1.0 WPCF Typical Low-to-Average Ratio 0.2 - - 5 0.15 0.25 ADWF (MGD) Figure 6-3. Peak and Minimum Flow Ratios vs. ADWF 5 The following groundwater infiltration analysis results are noted: Site 2 had min-to-baseline ratios that fell slightly outside of the typical min-to-baseline ratios as defined by WPCF. There may be slightly higher-than-normal groundwater infiltration occurring in the basins upstream from this site during periods of dry weather flow. 5 Due to attenuation, it should be expected that sites with larger flow volumes should not have quite the peak-toaverage and low-to-average flow ratios as sites with lesser flow volumes, which is why the typical and system trend lines slope closer to 1.0 as the ADWF increases, as shown in the figure. Page 15

Sanitary Sewer Flow Monitoring and I/I Report 6.3 Wet Weather Flow Monitoring Results 6.3.1 Inflow/Infiltration Methods I/I Definitions Infiltration/inflow (I/I) consists of storm water and groundwater which enters the sewer system through pipe defects and improper storm drainage connections, defined as follows: Inflow Definition: Storm water inflow (SWI) is defined as water discharged into the sewer system, including private sewer laterals, from direct connections such as downspouts, yard and area drains, holes in manhole covers, cross connections from storm drains, or catch basins. Impact: This component of I/I creates a peak flow problem in the sewer system and, together with RDI (explained below), dictates the required capacity of downstream pipes and transport facilities to carry these peak instantaneous flows. Because the response and magnitude of inflow is tied closely to the intensity of the storm event, the short-term peak instantaneous flows may result in surcharging and overflows within a collection system. Severe inflow may result in sewage dilution, resulting in upsetting the biological treatment (secondary treatment) at the treatment facility. Cost of Source Identification and Removal: Compared to infiltration sources, SWI locations are usually less difficult to find and usually less expensive to correct. These sources include direct and indirect cross connections with storm drainage systems, roof downspouts, and various types of surface drains. Generally, the costs to identify and remove sources of SWI are low compared to potential benefits to public health and safety, or the costs of new facilities to transport the resulting peak flows. Graphical Identification: Inflow is usually recognized graphically by large magnitude, short duration spikes immediately following a rain event. Infiltration Definition: Infiltration is defined as water entering the sanitary sewer system through defective pipes, pipe joints, and manhole walls, and may include cracks, offset joints, root intrusion points, and broken pipes. Impact: Infiltration typically creates long-term annual volumetric problems, the major impact being the cost of pumping and treating the additional volume of water, and of paying for treatment (for municipalities that are billed strictly on flow volume). Cost of Source Detection and Removal: Infiltration sources are usually harder to find and more expensive to correct than inflow sources. Infiltration sources include defects in deteriorated sewer pipes and/or manholes, and may include cracks, offset joints, root intrusion points, and broken pipes. The sources may be wide-spread throughout a sanitary sewer system. Graphical Identification: Infiltration is often recognized graphically by a gradual increase in flow after a wet weather event. The increased flow typically sustains for a period after rainfall has stopped and then gradually drops off as soils become less saturated, and as groundwater levels recede to normal levels (Exception: RRI will graphically look more like SWI than infiltration.). Infiltration can be further subdivided into components as follows: Groundwater Infiltration Groundwater infiltration (GWI) depends on the depth of the Page 16

Sanitary Sewer Flow Monitoring and I/I Report groundwater table above the pipelines as well as the percentage of the system submerged. The variation on groundwater levels and subsequent GWI are seasonal in nature. On a day-to-day basis, GWI rates are steady and will not fluctuate greatly. Rainfall Dependent Infiltration (RDI) This component occurs as a result of storm water and enters the sewer system through pipe defects similar to GWI, but due to rapid response, affects the system by contributing to peak flows as well as to the total I/I volume. This component may be further categorized as being rainfall-responsive or rainfall-related. Rainfall responsive infiltration (RRI) is storm water which enters the collection system indirectly through pipe defects, but normally in sewers constructed close to the ground surface such as private laterals. RRI is independent of the groundwater table, and reaches defective sewers via the pipe trench in which the sewer is constructed, particularly if the pipe is placed in impermeable soil and bedded and backfilled with a granular material. In this case, the pipe trench serves as a conduit similar to a French drain, conveying storm drainage to defective joints and other openings in the system. Note: this type of infiltration can have a very quick response and graphically can look very similar to SWI. Rainfall related infiltration is storm water that first percolates directly into the soil and then migrates to an infiltration point. Typically, the time of concentration for rainfall related infiltration may be 24 hours or longer, but depends on the soil permeability and saturation level. Figure 6-4 illustrates the possible locations and components of I/I. Figure 6-4. Infiltration / Inflow Locations and Components Page 17

Sanitary Sewer Flow Monitoring and I/I Report Graphical Identification of I/I Components Figure 6-5 shows sample graphs indicating the typical graphical response patterns for inflow and infiltration. 1.00 Inflow 0 Infiltration 30 Combination I/I 0.90 0 0.1 0.2 0 0.1 0.2 25 0.1 0.70 0.60 0 0 0.3 0.6 0.7 Rain (in/hr) 0.3 0.6 0.7 Rain (in/hr) Flow (gpm) 20 15 10 0.2 0.3 Rain (in/hr) 0 0 5 0 0.9 1.0 0.1 0.2 0 0.25 0.9 1.0 0.1 0.2 5 0 18 16 14 Rainfall 0.6 Baseline Flow Realtime Flow I/I Flow Rate 0.1 I/I (MGD) 0.35 0.25 0.15 5 0 4-Jun 5-Jun 0.3 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.0 Rain (in/hr) 0.15 5 0 17-Dec 18-Dec 19-Dec 20-Dec 0.3 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.0 Rain (in/hr) Flow (gpm) 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 22-Feb 23-Feb 0.2 0.3 0.6 Rain (in/hr) Response Pattern Sharp Spike Short Duration Response Pattern Gradual Increase Gradual Recession Response Pattern Combination of Inflow and Infiltration Figure 6-5. Infiltration/Inflow Graphical Response Patterns Page 18

Sanitary Sewer Flow Monitoring and I/I Report 6.3.2 I/I Analysis Techniques After differentiating I/I flows from baseline flows, various calculations can be made to determine which I/I component is more prevalent at a particular site, and to compare the relative magnitude of the I/I components between drainage basins and between storm events, summarized as follows: Infiltration Indicators R-Value: Knowing the acreages of each basin and total I/I attributable to a storm event, the percentage of rainfall that permeates into each basin can be calculated and is called the R-Value. The R-Value method provides a means to compare the relative magnitude and severity of total I/I volume between different basins and different storm events. Systems with R-Values less than 5% 6 are often considered to be performing well and this criterion will be used for this study. Because the infiltration component is usually more predominant than the inflow component on a totalized I/I volume flow basis, R-Value is listed as an indicator of infiltration. I/I per ADWF Method: Additionally, one can use the average dry weather flow (ADWF) as a means for normalizing between sites and between storm events. The I/I per ADWF method takes the total infiltration in gallons for a storm event, and divides that number by the strength of the storm event (inches of rain) and the ADWF in gallons per day. Because it is based on total I/I volume, it is predominantly an indicator of infiltration. Inflow Indicators Peak I/I Flow to ADWF Ratio: Peak I/I to ADWF Ratio is the peak measured I/I rate divided by ADWF. This ratio is a preferable comparative tool for I/I analysis to peaking factor because it strictly looks at I/I flow rates. Peaking factor (defined as peak flow divided by ADWF) can be skewed higher or lower depending on whether the storm event I/I response occurs during low flow or high flow hours. Peaking factor is a useful tool when looking at capacity issues (next section on Capacity). Figure 6-6 below shows a sample I/I graph that illustrates and summarizes the I/I response and I/I calculations made per site per storm event. Similar graphs for each site and storm event and are located in Appendix A. 6 Keefe, P.N. Test Basins for I/I Reduction and SSO Elimination, 1998, WEF Wet Weather Specialty Conference, Cleveland Page 19

Sanitary Sewer Flow Monitoring and I/I Report 2.40 2.10 1.80 1.50 1.20 0.90 0.60 Storm Event No. 1: 1.38 inches Realtime Baseline I/I Flow Hourly Rainfall Site 3 Total I/I: 456,000 Gallons R-Value: 2.3% I/I per ADWF: 1.11 Peak Flow: 2.25 MGD Peak I/I: 0.79 MGD Peaking Factor: 2.87 d/d Ratio: 0.69 0 0 0 0.60 Rainfall (inches/hr) 0.70 0 2/2 00:00 2/2 06:00 2/2 12:00 2/2 18:00 2/3 00:00 2/3 06:00 2/3 12:00 2/3 18:00 2/4 00:00 2/4 06:00 2/4 12:00 2/4 18:00 2/5 00:00 2/5 06:00 2/5 12:00 2/5 18:00 0 Figure 6-6. Sample I/I Flow Graph 6.3.3 I/I Results Summary Table 6-2 summarizes the I/I data collected during the flow monitoring period, including estimated total I/I through each flow monitoring site for the Storm Event. Site Name ADWF* (MGD) Estimated I/I Totals (gallons) Table 6-2 Site I/I Summary R-Value I/I per ADWF Method Peak Flow (MGD) Peak I/I Rate (MGD) Peak I/I to ADWF Ratio Site 01 0.276 182,000 2.8% 7 0.769 0.386 1.40 Site 02 2 21,000 % 0.28 8 59 8 Site 03 0.199 97,000 1.7% 0.65 0.379 0.139 0.70 Site 04 77 64,000 1.6% 1.09 0.158 60 0.78 Site 05 30 13,000 1.0% 6 97 55 1.82 *ADWF calculated as (5*weekday+2*weekend)/7 Figure 6-7 summarizes the I/I results graphically. The infiltration and inflow (I/I) results shown in this figure are taken from February 23, 2008 through February 28, 2008. This time period included the one significant storm event. Page 20

Sanitary Sewer Flow Monitoring and I/I Report 3.0% Infiltration 1.2 Inflow 2.5% System Average 1.0 1.8 1.6 R-Value, % % 1.5% 1.0% Total I&I to ADWF 0.6 Pk I&I to ADWF 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.6 % 0.2 0.2 % Site 1 Site 3 Site 4 Site 5 Site 2 Avg. Site 4 Site 1 Site 3 Site 5 Site 2 Avg. Site 5 Site 1 Site 4 Site 3 Site 2 Avg. Figure 6-7. Infiltration and Inflow Rankings: I/I Factors by Site The following I/I analysis results are noted: Infiltration: Sites 1, 3 and 4 had the highest ranked infiltration indicators (R-Value and I/I per ADWF Method). All sites had R-Values less than the 5% performance threshold during the February 23, 2008 to February 24, 2008 wet weather event. Inflow: Sites 1 and 5 had Peak I/I per ADWF Ratios that were greater than the system average. 6.4 Pipeline Capacity Analysis Peaking Factor: Peaking Factor is defined as the Peak Wet Weather Flow divided by the Average Dry Weather Flow. A peaking factor threshold value of 3.0 is commonly used for sanitary sewer design. d/d Ratio: The d/d ratio is the peak measured depth of flow divided by the pipe diameter. A d/d ratio less than 0.75 is a common threshold value used for pipe design. The d/d ratio for each site was computed based on the maximum depth of flow during the storm event. Table 6-3 summarizes the peak recorded d/d ratios and Peaking Factors per site during the February 23, 2008 to February 24, 2008 wet weather event. Page 21

Sanitary Sewer Flow Monitoring and I/I Report Table 6-3 d/d Ratio Analysis Summary Monitoring Site Peaking Factor d/d Ratio Site 01 2.79 7 Site 02 5 0.64 Site 03 1.90 8 Site 04 4 0.60 Site 05 3.18 0.24 4.0 PF = 3.0 1.0 Peaking Factor (Peak Flow / ADWF) 3.5 3.0 2.5 1.5 1.0 d/d Ratio 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.1 Surcharge Condition Site 5 Site 1 Site 2 Site 4 Site 3 Avg. Site 2 Site 4 Site 3 Site 1 Site 5 Avg. Figure 6-8. Capacity Rankings: Peaking Factor and d/d Ratio by Site The following capacity analysis results are noted: Peaking Factor All sites, except Site 5, were below the typical design threshold limit for peak flow to average dry weather flow ratio. d/d Ratio All sites, except Site 2, are below the typical design threshold limit for d/d ratio. It is noted that Site 2 appeared to be influenced by a sporadic back-flow condition as periodic jumps in level and dips in velocity were observed during rain-independent flows. There may be a hydraulic disturbance occurring downstream from Site 2 (i.e., influence by a larger line or pump station). This hydraulic backflow condition should be taken into consideration when reviewing capacity data at Site 2 versus the other flow monitoring locations. Page 22

Sanitary Sewer Flow Monitoring and I/I Report 6.5 Synthetic Hydrographs In order to model design storms, synthetic hydrographs were developed to approximate the actual RDI/I hydrograph shape in terms of parameters representing time to the peak and the recession coefficient. The actual RDI/I hydrograph was best matched with a synthetic hydrograph by separating the synthetic hydrograph into seven volume components (R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7). The seven components represent different response times to the rainfall event and, therefore, different infiltration or inflow paths into the sewer system. R1 is characterized by a short response time and is assumed to consist of mainly inflow. R7 represents slower response and longer recession times and consists of mostly infiltration. Levels of soil saturation are also considered. Using synthetic hydrograph analysis, appropriate time and recession parameters were estimated by a trial-and-error procedure until a good match was obtained. A sample synthetic hydrograph and its component hydrographs for the period of February 19 through February 25, 2008 for Site 3 is shown in Figure 6-9. Rain Realtime I/I Hydrograph Synthetic Hydrograph R1 Component R2 Component R3 Component R4 Component R5 Component R6 Component R7 Component I/I Rate (mgd) I/I Component (mgd) 0.16 0.14 0.12 8 6 4 2 0 19-Feb 20-Feb 21-Feb 22-Feb 23-Feb 24-Feb 25-Feb 0.14 0.12 8 6 4 2 0 19-Feb 20-Feb 21-Feb 22-Feb 23-Feb 24-Feb 25-Feb 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.7 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.7 Rain (in/hr) Rain (in/hr) Figure 6-9. Site 3 Synthetic Hydrograph Page 23

Sanitary Sewer Flow Monitoring and I/I Report 6.6 Design Storm Once the I/I components are defined, design storms can be applied and the resulting I/I flows can be predicted. The design storm used for this analysis was a 10-year storm event taken from the NOAA Western U.S. Precipitation Frequency Maps. Figure 6-10 summarizes the design storms per hour and shows the storm profile for the 10-year event. This particular profile distribution also fits the criterion for a 2-hour, 6-hour and 24-hour event. Hour Rainfall (inches per hour) 1 1 2 2 3 0.19 4 0.11 5 4 6 1 7 0.15 8 9 9 0.12 10 4 11 2 12 1 13 8 14 0.22 15 3 16 0.12 17 0.12 18 19 5 20 0.23 21 0.12 22 6 23 0.11 24 3 Total: 2.76 Rainfall (in/hr) 0.60 0 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Hour Figure 6-10. 10-Year, 24-Hour Design Storm Values Figure 6-11 shows the synthetic hydrograph response for the 10-year event for Site 5. Table 6-4 summarizes the final results for each design storm on a site-by-site basis. The peak I/I flows from the design storm coincide with peak dry weather flows to get a worst-case scenario of peak wet weather flows. Page 24

Sanitary Sewer Flow Monitoring and I/I Report Rain Estimated Total Flow Synthetic I/I Hydrograph Flow (mgd) 0.22 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.12 8 6 4 2 0 Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.7 Rain (in/hr) Figure 6-11. Site 5: 10-Year, 24-Hour Design Storm Synthetic Hydrograph Table 6-4 10 Year, 24 Hour Design Storm Response Summary Monitoring Site ADWF (MGD) Peak Flow (MGD) Peaking Factor Infiltration Site 01 0.27 2.27 8.34 825,000 Site 02 4 4.39 197,000 Site 03 0 3.95 208,000 Site 04 8 4 5.57 198,000 Site 05 3 6.74 104,000 Page 25

Sanitary Sewer Flow Monitoring and I/I Report 7 RECOMMENDATIONS V&A advises that future I/I reduction plans consider the following recommendations: 1. Determine I/I Reduction Program: The City should examine its I/I reduction needs to determine a future I/I reduction program. a. If peak flows, sanitary sewer overflows, and pipeline capacity issues are of greater concern, then the program can be weighted to investigate and reduce sources of inflow within the basins with the greatest inflow problems. b. If total infiltration and general pipeline deterioration is of greater concern, then the program can be weighted to investigate and reduce sources of infiltration within the basins with the greatest infiltration problems. 2. I/I Reduction Methods: Potential I/I reduction methods include the following: a. smoke testing b. mini-basin flow monitoring c. night-time reconnaissance work to (1) investigate and determine direct point sources of inflow, and (2) determine the areas and/or pipe reaches responsible for high levels of infiltration contribution. d. CCTV inspection 3. I/I Reduction Cost Effective Analysis: The City should conduct a study to determine which is more cost-effective: (1) locating the sources of infiltration and inflow and systematically rehabilitating or replacing the faulty pipelines; or (2) continued treatment of the additional storm water I/I flow. Page 26

Sanitary Sewer Flow Monitoring and I/I Report Appendix A Flow Monitoring Sites: Data, Graphs, Information Appendix A

Monitoring Site: Manhole Address: Site 1 Temporary Flow Monitoring Study Sanitary Sewer Collection System Wescott Road at Ashley Drive Size/Type of Line: 15-inch Sanitary Sewer Pipe Data Summary Report Site 3 Site 4 Site 5 Site 2 Site 1

Site Information Report Monitoring Site: Site 1 Location: Wescott Road at Ashley Drive Street-level photo: Diameter: 15 inches Average Dry Weather Flow: 0.276 MGD Peak Measured Flow: 0.769 MGD Street map: Sanitary sewer map: Site 1 Site 1 Plan view photo: Flow sketch: Flow Meter N 15

1.00 0.90 0 0.70 0.60 0 0 0 1-Feb Fri 2-Feb Sat 3-Feb Sun 4-Feb Mon 5-Feb Tue 6-Feb Wed 7-Feb Thu 8-Feb Fri 9-Feb Sat 10-Feb Sun 11-Feb Mon 12-Feb Tue Monitoring Site: Site 1 13-Feb Wed Rain Flow BLFlow 14-Feb Thu 15-Feb Fri 0 5 0.15 0.25 0.35 0 Rainfall (in/hr) Monthly Flow Summary February, 2008 0.27 0.27 0.28 0.28 0.29 0.27 0.29 0.29 0.28 0.32 0 0.31 0.28 0.29 0.29 5 0 0.35 0.25 0.15 5 0 1.2 1.6 2.4 2/1 2/2 2/3 2/4 2/5 2/6 2/7 2/8 2/9 2/10 2/11 2/12 2/13 2/14 2/15 2/16 2/17 2/18 2/19 2/20 2/21 2/22 2/23 2/24 Flow (MGal) 2/25 2/26 2/27 2/28 2/29 Rainfall (in/day) 1.00 0.90 0 0.70 0.60 0 0 0 16-Feb Sat 17-Feb Sun 18-Feb Mon 19-Feb Tue 20-Feb Wed 21-Feb Thu 22-Feb Fri 23-Feb Sat 24-Feb Sun 25-Feb Mon 26-Feb Tue 27-Feb Wed 28-Feb Thu 29-Feb Fri 0 5 0.15 0.25 0.35 0 Rainfall (in/hr) Total Monthly Rainfall: 1.92 37 inches 2 Avg Flow: 0.295 MGD Peak 372008 Flow: 0.769 MGD Min Flow: 53 MGD

1.00 0.90 0 0.70 0.60 0 0 0 1-Mar Sat 2-Mar Sun 3-Mar Mon 4-Mar Tue 5-Mar Wed 6-Mar Thu 7-Mar Fri 8-Mar Sat 9-Mar Sun 10-Mar Mon 11-Mar Tue 12-Mar Wed Monitoring Site: Site 1 13-Mar Thu Rain Flow BLFlow 14-Mar Fri 15-Mar Sat 0 5 0.15 0.25 0.35 0 Rainfall (in/hr) Monthly Flow Summary March, 2008 0.29 0.28 0.29 0.28 0.27 0.29 0.28 0.27 0.26 0.27 0.27 0.25 0.28 0.29 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.26 0.27 0.29 0.28 0.28 0.27 5 0 0.35 0.25 0.15 5 0 1.2 1.6 2.4 3/1 3/2 3/3 3/4 3/5 3/6 3/7 3/8 3/9 3/10 3/11 3/12 3/13 3/14 3/15 3/16 3/17 3/18 3/19 3/20 3/21 3/22 3/23 3/24 3/25 3/26 Flow (MGal) 3/27 3/28 3/29 3/30 3/31 Rainfall (in/day) 1.00 0.90 0 0.70 0.60 0 0 0 16-Mar Sun 17-Mar Mon 18-Mar Tue 19-Mar Wed 20-Mar Thu 21-Mar Fri 22-Mar Sat 23-Mar Sun 24-Mar Mon 25-Mar Tue 26-Mar Wed 27-Mar Thu 28-Mar Fri 29-Mar Sat 30-Mar Sun 31-Mar Mon 0 5 0.15 0.25 0.35 0 Rainfall (in/hr) Total Monthly Rainfall: 0.12 37 inches 3 Avg Flow: 0.277 MGD Peak 372008 Flow: 0.656 MGD Min Flow: 28 MGD

I/I Summary Monitoring Site: Site 1 Baseline, Realtime, and I/I Flows over Monitoring Period: Storm Event Rainfall: 0.76 inches 1.00 0.90 0 0.70 0.60 0 0 0 0.90 0 0.70 0.60 0 0 0 02/23 02/24 02/25 02/26 02/27 02/28 02/29 02/14 02/15 02/16 02/17 02/18 02/19 02/20 02/21 02/22 02/23 02/24 02/25 02/26 02/27 02/28 02/29 03/01 03/02 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.7 Rain (in/hr) Storm Event #1 Detail I/I Graph 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.7 Rain (in/hr) Storm Event #1 I/I Analysis Rainfall: Peak Flow: Peak I/I Rate: Peak Level: Total I/I: 0.76 inches 0.769 0.386 7.00 182,000 MGD MGD inches gallons PF: Pk I/I:ADWF: 2.79 1.40 d/d Ratio: 7 R-Value: 2.8% I/I per ADWF: 7

Average Dry Weather Flow Monitoring Site: Site 1 00 Weekday Weekend ADWF 50 00 Average Dry Weather Flow: 0.276 MGD 0.350 0 0.250 0 0.150 0 50 00 24 % Peak Measured Flow: 0.769 MGD 47 % 0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 Peak measured flow shown on following pages in weekly flow data graphs

Scatter Plots (Flow, Velocity vs. Depth) Monitoring Site: Site 1 3.00 2.50 Velocity (fps) 0 1.50 1.00 0 0 1.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 Level (in) 0.90 0 0.70 0.60 0 0 0 1.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 Level (in)

Level, Velocity and Flow From 2/11/2008 to 2/18/2008 Monitoring Site: Site 1 Level (in) 1 9.0 8.0 7.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 1.0 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Avg Level: 3.72 in. Peak 37 Level: 6.35 in. Min Level: 2.22 in. Lev 3.5 3.0 Avg Velocity: 1.7 fps Peak 37Velocity: 2.24 fps Min Velocity: 0.64 fps Vel 2.5 Velocity (fps) 1.5 1.0 1.00 0.90 0 0.70 Rainfall (in/hr) 0.60 0 0 Total Weekly Rainfall: 01 37 inches Rain Flow BLFlow 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.7 0 2/11 2/12 2/13 2/14 2/15 2/16 2/17 Avg Flow: 0.274 MGD Peak 137 Flow: 0.628 MGD Min Flow: 53 MGD

Level, Velocity and Flow From 2/18/2008 to 2/25/2008 Monitoring Site: Site 1 Level (in) 1 9.0 8.0 7.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 1.0 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Avg Level: 3.95 in. Peak 37 Level: 7 in. Min Level: 2.28 in. Lev 3.5 3.0 Avg Velocity: 1.75 fps Peak 37 Velocity: 2.45 fps Min Velocity: 0.63 fps Vel 2.5 Velocity (fps) 1.5 1.0 1.00 0.90 0 0.70 Rainfall (in/hr) 0.60 0 0 Total Weekly Rainfall: 1.922 37 inches Rain Flow BLFlow 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.7 0 2/18 2/19 2/20 2/21 2/22 2/23 2/24 Avg Flow: 7 MGD Peak 237 Flow: 0.769 MGD Min Flow: 54 MGD

Level, Velocity and Flow From 2/25/2008 to 3/3/2008 Monitoring Site: Site 1 Level (in) 1 9.0 8.0 7.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 1.0 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Avg Level: 3.87 in. Peak 37 Level: 6.37 in. Min Level: 2.24 in. Lev 3.5 3.0 Avg Velocity: 1.75 fps Peak 37 Velocity: 2.35 fps Min Velocity: 0.7 fps Vel 2.5 Velocity (fps) 1.5 1.0 1.00 0.90 0 0.70 Rainfall (in/hr) 0.60 0 0 Total Weekly Rainfall: 03 37 inches Rain Flow BLFlow 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.7 0 2/25 2/26 2/27 2/28 2/29 3/1 3/2 Avg Flow: 0.297 MGD Peak 37 Flow: 0.656 MGD Min Flow: 64 MGD

Level, Velocity and Flow From 3/3/2008 to 3/10/2008 Monitoring Site: Site 1 Level (in) 1 9.0 8.0 7.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 1.0 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Avg Level: 3.72 in. Peak 37 Level: 6.33 in. Min Level: 2.1 in. Lev 3.5 3.0 Avg Velocity: 1.75 fps Peak 37 Velocity: 2.34 fps Min Velocity: 0.72 fps Vel 2.5 Velocity (fps) 1.5 1.0 1.00 0.90 0 0.70 Rainfall (in/hr) 0.60 0 0 Total Weekly Rainfall: 04 37 inches Rain Flow BLFlow 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.7 0 3/3 3/4 3/5 3/6 3/7 3/8 3/9 Avg Flow: 0.281 MGD Peak 437 Flow: 0.655 MGD Min Flow: 55 MGD

Level, Velocity and Flow From 3/10/2008 to 3/17/2008 Monitoring Site: Site 1 Level (in) 1 9.0 8.0 7.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 1.0 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Avg Level: 3.62 in. Peak 37 Level: 6.1 in. Min Level: 1.81 in. Lev 3.5 3.0 Avg Velocity: 1.75 fps Peak 37 Velocity: 2.31 fps Min Velocity: 1 fps Vel 2.5 Velocity (fps) 1.5 1.0 1.00 0.90 0 0.70 Rainfall (in/hr) 0.60 0 0 Total Weekly Rainfall: 05 37 inches Rain Flow BLFlow 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.7 0 3/10 3/11 3/12 3/13 3/14 3/15 3/16 Avg Flow: 0.272 MGD Peak 537 Flow: 0.612 MGD Min Flow: 28 MGD

Level, Velocity and Flow From 3/17/2008 to 3/24/2008 Monitoring Site: Site 1 Level (in) 1 9.0 8.0 7.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 1.0 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Avg Level: 3.64 in. Peak 37 Level: 5.9 in. Min Level: 1.94 in. Lev 3.5 3.0 Avg Velocity: 1.75 fps Peak 37 Velocity: 2.44 fps Min Velocity: 1 fps Vel 2.5 Velocity (fps) 1.5 1.0 1.00 0.90 0 0.70 Rainfall (in/hr) 0.60 0 0 Total Weekly Rainfall: 16 37 inches Rain Flow BLFlow 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.7 0 3/17 3/18 3/19 3/20 3/21 3/22 3/23 Avg Flow: 0.274 MGD Peak 637 Flow: 0.607 MGD Min Flow: 54 MGD

Level, Velocity and Flow From 3/24/2008 to 3/31/2008 Monitoring Site: Site 1 Level (in) 1 9.0 8.0 7.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 1.0 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Avg Level: 3.59 in. Peak 37 Level: 5.71 in. Min Level: 1.89 in. Lev 3.5 3.0 Avg Velocity: 1.76 fps Peak 37 Velocity: 2.2 fps Min Velocity: 0.79 fps Vel 2.5 Velocity (fps) 1.5 1.0 1.00 0.90 0 0.70 Rainfall (in/hr) 0.60 0 0 Total Weekly Rainfall: 0.117 37 inches Rain Flow BLFlow 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.7 0 3/24 3/25 3/26 3/27 3/28 3/29 3/30 Avg Flow: 0.272 MGD Peak 737 Flow: 3 MGD Min Flow: 47 MGD

Monitoring Site: Manhole Address: Site 2 Temporary Flow Monitoring Study Sanitary Sewer Collection System Colus Avenue, Colusa County Fairgrounds Size/Type of Line: 12-inch Sanitary Sewer Pipe Data Summary Report Site 3 Site 4 Site 5 Site 2 Site 1

Site Information Report Monitoring Site: Site 2 Location: Colus Avenue, Colusa County Fairgrounds Street-level photo: Diameter: 12 inches Average Dry Weather Flow: 2 MGD Peak Measured Flow: 0.241 MGD Street map: Sanitary sewer map: Site 2 Site 2 Plan view photo: Flow sketch: 12 N Flow Meter

0.35 0.25 0.15 5 0 1-Feb Fri 2-Feb Sat 3-Feb Sun 4-Feb Mon 5-Feb Tue 6-Feb Wed 7-Feb Thu 8-Feb Fri 9-Feb Sat 10-Feb Sun 11-Feb Mon 12-Feb Tue Monitoring Site: Site 2 13-Feb Wed Rain Flow BLFlow 14-Feb Thu 15-Feb Fri 0 5 0.15 0.25 0.35 0 Rainfall (in/hr) Monthly Flow Summary February, 2008 0.11 0.12 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.11 0.12 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.14 0.12 8 6 4 2 0 1.2 1.6 2.4 2/1 2/2 2/3 2/4 2/5 2/6 2/7 2/8 2/9 2/10 2/11 2/12 2/13 2/14 2/15 2/16 2/17 2/18 2/19 2/20 2/21 2/22 2/23 2/24 Flow (MGal) 2/25 2/26 2/27 2/28 2/29 Rainfall (in/day) 0.35 0.25 0.15 5 0 16-Feb Sat 17-Feb Sun 18-Feb Mon 19-Feb Tue 20-Feb Wed 21-Feb Thu 22-Feb Fri 23-Feb Sat 24-Feb Sun 25-Feb Mon 26-Feb Tue 27-Feb Wed 28-Feb Thu 29-Feb Fri 0 5 0.15 0.25 0.35 0 Rainfall (in/hr) Total Monthly Rainfall: 1.92 38 inches 2 Avg Flow: 0.11 MGD Peak 382008 Flow: 0.24 MGD Min Flow: 29 MGD

0.35 0.25 0.15 5 0 1-Mar Sat 2-Mar Sun 3-Mar Mon 4-Mar Tue 5-Mar Wed 6-Mar Thu 7-Mar Fri 8-Mar Sat 9-Mar Sun 10-Mar Mon 11-Mar Tue 12-Mar Wed Monitoring Site: Site 2 13-Mar Thu Rain Flow BLFlow 14-Mar Fri 15-Mar Sat 0 5 0.15 0.25 0.35 0 Rainfall (in/hr) Monthly Flow Summary March, 2008 0.14 0.12 8 6 0.12 0.13 9 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.11 0.11 9 0.11 0.11 4 2 0 1.2 1.6 2.4 3/1 3/2 3/3 3/4 3/5 3/6 3/7 3/8 3/9 3/10 3/11 3/12 3/13 3/14 3/15 3/16 3/17 3/18 3/19 3/20 3/21 3/22 3/23 3/24 3/25 3/26 Flow (MGal) 3/27 3/28 3/29 3/30 3/31 Rainfall (in/day) 0.35 0.25 0.15 5 0 16-Mar Sun 17-Mar Mon 18-Mar Tue 19-Mar Wed 20-Mar Thu 21-Mar Fri 22-Mar Sat 23-Mar Sun 24-Mar Mon 25-Mar Tue 26-Mar Wed 27-Mar Thu 28-Mar Fri 29-Mar Sat 30-Mar Sun 31-Mar Mon 0 5 0.15 0.25 0.35 0 Rainfall (in/hr) Total Monthly Rainfall: 0.12 38 inches 3 Avg Flow: 5 MGD Peak 382008 Flow: 0.241 MGD Min Flow: 26 MGD

I/I Summary Monitoring Site: Site 2 Baseline, Realtime, and I/I Flows over Monitoring Period: Storm Event Rainfall: 0.76 inches 0.35 0.25 0.15 5 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.7 0.25 0.1 0.2 0.15 5 0 02/23 02/24 02/25 02/26 02/27 02/28 02/29 02/14 02/15 02/16 02/17 02/18 02/19 02/20 02/21 02/22 02/23 02/24 02/25 02/26 02/27 02/28 02/29 03/01 03/02 Rain (in/hr) Storm Event #1 Detail I/I Graph 0.3 Rain (in/hr) 0.6 0.7 Storm Event #1 I/I Analysis Rainfall: Peak Flow: Peak I/I Rate: Peak Level: Total I/I: 0.76 inches 8 59 7.64 21,000 MGD MGD inches gallons PF: Pk I/I:ADWF: 5 8 d/d Ratio: 0.64 R-Value: % I/I per ADWF: 0.28

Average Dry Weather Flow Monitoring Site: Site 2 0.180 Weekday Weekend ADWF 0.160 0.140 Average Dry Weather Flow: 2 MGD 0.120 0 80 60 40 20 49 % Peak Measured Flow: 0.241 MGD 95 % 00 0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 Peak measured flow shown on following pages in weekly flow data graphs

Scatter Plots (Flow, Velocity vs. Depth) Monitoring Site: Site 2 0.90 0 0.70 Velocity (fps) 0.60 0 0 0 4.0 6.0 8.0 1 1 Level (in) 0.25 0.15 5 0 4.0 6.0 8.0 1 1 Level (in)

Level, Velocity and Flow From 2/11/2008 to 2/18/2008 Monitoring Site: Site 2 1 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Avg Level: 5.85 in. Peak 38 Level: 7.87 in. Min Level: 3.86 in. Lev 1 Level (in) 8.0 6.0 4.0 1.8 1.6 Avg Velocity: 4 fps Peak 38 Velocity: 0.7 fps Min Velocity: 0.28 fps Vel Velocity (fps) 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.6 0.2 0.35 0.25 Rainfall (in/hr) 0.15 5 Total Weekly Rainfall: 01 38 inches Rain Flow BLFlow 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.7 0 2/11 2/12 2/13 2/14 2/15 2/16 2/17 Avg Flow: 8 MGD Peak 138 Flow: 0.186 MGD Min Flow: 41 MGD

Level, Velocity and Flow From 2/18/2008 to 2/25/2008 Monitoring Site: Site 2 1 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Avg Level: 5.93 in. Peak 38 Level: 9.88 in. Min Level: 4.02 in. Lev 1 Level (in) 8.0 6.0 4.0 1.8 1.6 Avg Velocity: 7 fps Peak 38 Velocity: 0.75 fps Min Velocity: 0.11 fps Vel Velocity (fps) 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.6 0.2 0.35 0.25 Rainfall (in/hr) 0.15 5 Total Weekly Rainfall: 1.922 38 inches Rain Flow BLFlow 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.7 0 2/18 2/19 2/20 2/21 2/22 2/23 2/24 Avg Flow: 0.115 MGD Peak 238 Flow: 8 MGD Min Flow: 29 MGD

Level, Velocity and Flow From 2/25/2008 to 3/3/2008 Monitoring Site: Site 2 1 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Avg Level: 6.21 in. Peak 38 Level: 11.41 in. Min Level: 3.96 in. Lev 1 Level (in) 8.0 6.0 4.0 1.8 1.6 Avg Velocity: 3 fps Peak 38 Velocity: 0.74 fps Min Velocity: 0.17 fps Vel Velocity (fps) 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.6 0.2 0.35 0.25 Rainfall (in/hr) 0.15 5 Total Weekly Rainfall: 03 38 inches Rain Flow BLFlow 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.7 0 2/25 2/26 2/27 2/28 2/29 3/1 3/2 Avg Flow: 0.111 MGD Peak 38 Flow: 0.24 MGD Min Flow: 37 MGD

Level, Velocity and Flow From 3/3/2008 to 3/10/2008 Monitoring Site: Site 2 1 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Avg Level: 5.75 in. Peak 38 Level: 10.19 in. Min Level: 3.56 in. Lev 1 Level (in) 8.0 6.0 4.0 1.8 1.6 Avg Velocity: 3 fps Peak 38 Velocity: 0.73 fps Min Velocity: 0.17 fps Vel Velocity (fps) 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.6 0.2 0.35 0.25 Rainfall (in/hr) 0.15 5 Total Weekly Rainfall: 04 38 inches Rain Flow BLFlow 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.7 0 3/3 3/4 3/5 3/6 3/7 3/8 3/9 Avg Flow: 1 MGD Peak 438 Flow: 0.241 MGD Min Flow: 26 MGD

Level, Velocity and Flow From 3/10/2008 to 3/17/2008 Monitoring Site: Site 2 1 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Avg Level: 5.61 in. Peak 38 Level: 9.52 in. Min Level: 3.56 in. Lev 1 Level (in) 8.0 6.0 4.0 1.8 1.6 Avg Velocity: 6 fps Peak 38 Velocity: 0.74 fps Min Velocity: 0.18 fps Vel Velocity (fps) 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.6 0.2 0.35 0.25 Rainfall (in/hr) 0.15 5 Total Weekly Rainfall: 05 38 inches Rain Flow BLFlow 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.7 0 3/10 3/11 3/12 3/13 3/14 3/15 3/16 Avg Flow: 7 MGD Peak 538 Flow: 0.221 MGD Min Flow: 32 MGD

Level, Velocity and Flow From 3/17/2008 to 3/24/2008 Monitoring Site: Site 2 1 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Avg Level: 5.84 in. Peak 38 Level: 11.21 in. Min Level: 3.48 in. Lev 1 Level (in) 8.0 6.0 4.0 1.8 1.6 Avg Velocity: 3 fps Peak 38 Velocity: 0.78 fps Min Velocity: 0.12 fps Vel Velocity (fps) 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.6 0.2 0.35 0.25 Rainfall (in/hr) 0.15 5 Total Weekly Rainfall: 16 38 inches Rain Flow BLFlow 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.7 0 3/17 3/18 3/19 3/20 3/21 3/22 3/23 Avg Flow: 1 MGD Peak 638 Flow: 1 MGD Min Flow: 31 MGD

Level, Velocity and Flow From 3/24/2008 to 3/31/2008 Monitoring Site: Site 2 1 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Avg Level: 5.09 in. Peak 38 Level: 7.51 in. Min Level: 3.54 in. Lev 1 Level (in) 8.0 6.0 4.0 1.8 1.6 Avg Velocity: 8 fps Peak 38 Velocity: 0.69 fps Min Velocity: 0.25 fps Vel Velocity (fps) 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.6 0.2 0.35 0.25 Rainfall (in/hr) 0.15 5 Total Weekly Rainfall: 0.117 38 inches Rain Flow BLFlow 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.7 0 3/24 3/25 3/26 3/27 3/28 3/29 3/30 Avg Flow: 1 MGD Peak 738 Flow: 0.158 MGD Min Flow: 33 MGD

Monitoring Site: Manhole Address: Site 3 Temporary Flow Monitoring Study Sanitary Sewer Collection System 9th Street at Harris Street Size/Type of Line: 12-inch Sanitary Sewer Pipe Data Summary Report Site 3 Site 4 Site 5 Site 2 Site 1

Site Information Report Monitoring Site: Site 3 Location: 9th Street at Harris Street Street-level photo: Diameter: 12 inches Average Dry Weather Flow: 0.199 MGD Peak Measured Flow: 0.379 MGD Street map: Sanitary sewer map: Site 3 Site 3 Plan view photo: Flow sketch: 12 N Flow Meter

0.70 0.60 0 0 0 1-Feb Fri 2-Feb Sat 3-Feb Sun 4-Feb Mon 5-Feb Tue 6-Feb Wed 7-Feb Thu 8-Feb Fri 9-Feb Sat 10-Feb Sun 11-Feb Mon 12-Feb Tue Monitoring Site: Site 3 13-Feb Wed Rain Flow BLFlow 14-Feb Thu 15-Feb Fri 0 5 0.15 0.25 0.35 0 Rainfall (in/hr) Monthly Flow Summary February, 2008 0.22 0.21 0.21 0.22 0.22 0.23 0.22 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.25 0.15 5 0 1.2 1.6 2.4 2/1 2/2 2/3 2/4 2/5 2/6 2/7 2/8 2/9 2/10 2/11 2/12 2/13 2/14 2/15 2/16 2/17 2/18 2/19 2/20 2/21 2/22 2/23 2/24 Flow (MGal) 2/25 2/26 2/27 2/28 2/29 Rainfall (in/day) 0.70 0.60 0 0 0 16-Feb Sat 17-Feb Sun 18-Feb Mon 19-Feb Tue 20-Feb Wed 21-Feb Thu 22-Feb Fri 23-Feb Sat 24-Feb Sun 25-Feb Mon 26-Feb Tue 27-Feb Wed 28-Feb Thu 29-Feb Fri 0 5 0.15 0.25 0.35 0 Rainfall (in/hr) Total Monthly Rainfall: 1.92 39 inches 2 Avg Flow: 0.21 MGD Peak 392008 Flow: 0.379 MGD Min Flow: 63 MGD

0.70 0.60 0 0 0 1-Mar Sat 2-Mar Sun 3-Mar Mon 4-Mar Tue 5-Mar Wed 6-Mar Thu 7-Mar Fri 8-Mar Sat 9-Mar Sun 10-Mar Mon 11-Mar Tue 12-Mar Wed Monitoring Site: Site 3 13-Mar Thu Rain Flow BLFlow 14-Mar Fri 15-Mar Sat 0 5 0.15 0.25 0.35 0 Rainfall (in/hr) Monthly Flow Summary March, 2008 0.25 0.15 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.21 0.19 0.22 0.22 0.24 0.23 0.25 0.25 5 0 1.2 1.6 2.4 3/1 3/2 3/3 3/4 3/5 3/6 3/7 3/8 3/9 3/10 3/11 3/12 3/13 3/14 3/15 3/16 3/17 3/18 3/19 3/20 3/21 3/22 3/23 3/24 3/25 3/26 Flow (MGal) 3/27 3/28 3/29 3/30 3/31 Rainfall (in/day) 0.70 0.60 0 0 0 16-Mar Sun 17-Mar Mon 18-Mar Tue 19-Mar Wed 20-Mar Thu 21-Mar Fri 22-Mar Sat 23-Mar Sun 24-Mar Mon 25-Mar Tue 26-Mar Wed 27-Mar Thu 28-Mar Fri 29-Mar Sat 30-Mar Sun 31-Mar Mon 0 5 0.15 0.25 0.35 0 Rainfall (in/hr) Total Monthly Rainfall: 0.12 39 inches 3 Avg Flow: 6 MGD Peak 392008 Flow: 0.379 MGD Min Flow: 56 MGD

I/I Summary Monitoring Site: Site 3 Baseline, Realtime, and I/I Flows over Monitoring Period: Storm Event Rainfall: 0.76 inches 0.70 0.60 0 0 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.7 0 0.35 0.1 0.2 0.25 0.15 5 0 02/23 02/24 02/25 02/26 02/27 02/28 02/29 02/14 02/15 02/16 02/17 02/18 02/19 02/20 02/21 02/22 02/23 02/24 02/25 02/26 02/27 02/28 02/29 03/01 03/02 Rain (in/hr) Storm Event #1 Detail I/I Graph 0.3 Rain (in/hr) 0.6 0.7 Storm Event #1 I/I Analysis Rainfall: Peak Flow: Peak I/I Rate: Peak Level: Total I/I: 0.76 inches 0.379 0.139 5.79 97,000 MGD MGD inches gallons PF: Pk I/I:ADWF: 1.90 0.70 d/d Ratio: 8 R-Value: 1.7% I/I per ADWF: 0.65

Average Dry Weather Flow Monitoring Site: Site 3 0.350 Weekday Weekend ADWF 0 Average Dry Weather Flow: 0.199 MGD 0.250 0 0.150 0 38 % Peak Measured Flow: 0.379 MGD 50 00 50 % 0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 Peak measured flow shown on following pages in weekly flow data graphs

Scatter Plots (Flow, Velocity vs. Depth) Monitoring Site: Site 3 1.80 1.60 1.40 Velocity (fps) 1.20 1.00 0 0.60 0 0 1.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 Level (in) 0 0.35 0.25 0.15 5 0 1.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 Level (in)

Level, Velocity and Flow From 2/11/2008 to 2/18/2008 Monitoring Site: Site 3 1 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Avg Level: 4.5 in. Peak 39Level: 5.59 in. Min Level: 3.18 in. Lev 1 Level (in) 8.0 6.0 4.0 3.0 2.5 Avg Velocity: 1.1 fps Peak 39Velocity: 1.53 fps Min Velocity: 9 fps Vel Velocity (fps) 1.5 1.0 0.70 0.60 0 Rainfall (in/hr) 0 Total Weekly Rainfall: 01 39 inches Rain Flow BLFlow 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.7 0 2/11 2/12 2/13 2/14 2/15 2/16 2/17 Avg Flow: 1 MGD Peak 139 Flow: 0.35 MGD Min Flow: 63 MGD

Level, Velocity and Flow From 2/18/2008 to 2/25/2008 Monitoring Site: Site 3 1 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Avg Level: 4.67 in. Peak 39 Level: 5.79 in. Min Level: 3.26 in. Lev 1 Level (in) 8.0 6.0 4.0 3.0 2.5 Avg Velocity: 1.13 fps Peak 39 Velocity: 1.56 fps Min Velocity: 6 fps Vel Velocity (fps) 1.5 1.0 0.70 0.60 0 Rainfall (in/hr) 0 Total Weekly Rainfall: 1.922 39 inches Rain Flow BLFlow 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.7 0 2/18 2/19 2/20 2/21 2/22 2/23 2/24 Avg Flow: 0.216 MGD Peak 239 Flow: 0.379 MGD Min Flow: 63 MGD

Level, Velocity and Flow From 2/25/2008 to 3/3/2008 Monitoring Site: Site 3 1 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Avg Level: 4.58 in. Peak 39 Level: 5.63 in. Min Level: 3.31 in. Lev 1 Level (in) 8.0 6.0 4.0 3.0 2.5 Avg Velocity: 1.1 fps Peak 39Velocity: 1.54 fps Min Velocity: 3 fps Vel Velocity (fps) 1.5 1.0 0.70 0.60 0 Rainfall (in/hr) 0 Total Weekly Rainfall: 03 39 inches Rain Flow BLFlow 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.7 0 2/25 2/26 2/27 2/28 2/29 3/1 3/2 Avg Flow: 5 MGD Peak 39 Flow: 0.347 MGD Min Flow: 63 MGD

Level, Velocity and Flow From 3/3/2008 to 3/10/2008 Monitoring Site: Site 3 1 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Avg Level: 4.5 in. Peak 39Level: 5.51 in. Min Level: 3.28 in. Lev 1 Level (in) 8.0 6.0 4.0 3.0 2.5 Avg Velocity: 1.06 fps Peak 39 Velocity: 1.49 fps Min Velocity: 4 fps Vel Velocity (fps) 1.5 1.0 0.70 0.60 0 Rainfall (in/hr) 0 Total Weekly Rainfall: 04 39 inches Rain Flow BLFlow 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.7 0 3/3 3/4 3/5 3/6 3/7 3/8 3/9 Avg Flow: 0.194 MGD Peak 439 Flow: 0.336 MGD Min Flow: 63 MGD

Level, Velocity and Flow From 3/10/2008 to 3/17/2008 Monitoring Site: Site 3 1 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Avg Level: 4.52 in. Peak 39 Level: 5.46 in. Min Level: 3.15 in. Lev 1 Level (in) 8.0 6.0 4.0 3.0 2.5 Avg Velocity: 1.09 fps Peak 39 Velocity: 1.45 fps Min Velocity: 3 fps Vel Velocity (fps) 1.5 1.0 0.70 0.60 0 Rainfall (in/hr) 0 Total Weekly Rainfall: 05 39 inches Rain Flow BLFlow 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.7 0 3/10 3/11 3/12 3/13 3/14 3/15 3/16 Avg Flow: 0.2 MGD Peak 539 Flow: 0.324 MGD Min Flow: 57 MGD

Level, Velocity and Flow From 3/17/2008 to 3/24/2008 Monitoring Site: Site 3 1 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Avg Level: 4.76 in. Peak 39 Level: 5.87 in. Min Level: 3.23 in. Lev 1 Level (in) 8.0 6.0 4.0 3.0 2.5 Avg Velocity: 1.1 fps Peak 39Velocity: 1.49 fps Min Velocity: 1 fps Vel Velocity (fps) 1.5 1.0 0.70 0.60 0 Rainfall (in/hr) 0 Total Weekly Rainfall: 16 39 inches Rain Flow BLFlow 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.7 0 3/17 3/18 3/19 3/20 3/21 3/22 3/23 Avg Flow: 0.216 MGD Peak 639 Flow: 0.366 MGD Min Flow: 56 MGD

Level, Velocity and Flow From 3/24/2008 to 3/31/2008 Monitoring Site: Site 3 1 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Avg Level: 5.17 in. Peak 39 Level: 6.02 in. Min Level: 4.1 in. Lev 1 Level (in) 8.0 6.0 4.0 3.0 2.5 Avg Velocity: 1.16 fps Peak 39 Velocity: 1.49 fps Min Velocity: 0.7 fps Vel Velocity (fps) 1.5 1.0 0.70 0.60 0 Rainfall (in/hr) 0 Total Weekly Rainfall: 0.117 39 inches Rain Flow BLFlow 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.7 0 3/24 3/25 3/26 3/27 3/28 3/29 3/30 Avg Flow: 0.249 MGD Peak 739 Flow: 0.379 MGD Min Flow: 7 MGD

Monitoring Site: Manhole Address: Site 4 Temporary Flow Monitoring Study Sanitary Sewer Collection System 8th Street at Tuttle Lane Size/Type of Line: 8-inch Sanitary Sewer Pipe Data Summary Report Site 3 Site 4 Site 5 Site 2 Site 1

Site Information Report Monitoring Site: Site 4 Location: 8th Street at Tuttle Lane Street-level photo: Diameter: 8 inches Average Dry Weather Flow: 77 MGD Peak Measured Flow: 0.191 MGD Street map: Sanitary sewer map: Site 4 Site 4 Plan view photo: Flow sketch: 6 N 8 Flow Meter

0.35 0.25 0.15 5 0 1-Feb Fri 2-Feb Sat 3-Feb Sun 4-Feb Mon 5-Feb Tue 6-Feb Wed 7-Feb Thu 8-Feb Fri 9-Feb Sat 10-Feb Sun 11-Feb Mon 12-Feb Tue Monitoring Site: Site 4 13-Feb Wed Rain Flow BLFlow 14-Feb Thu 15-Feb Fri 0 5 0.15 0.25 0.35 0 Rainfall (in/hr) Monthly Flow Summary February, 2008 7 8 8 7 9 8 9 9 8 9 9 9 9 9 9 8 8 6 4 2 0 1.2 1.6 2.4 2/1 2/2 2/3 2/4 2/5 2/6 2/7 2/8 2/9 2/10 2/11 2/12 2/13 2/14 2/15 2/16 2/17 2/18 2/19 2/20 2/21 2/22 2/23 2/24 Flow (MGal) 2/25 2/26 2/27 2/28 2/29 Rainfall (in/day) 0.35 0.25 0.15 5 0 16-Feb Sat 17-Feb Sun 18-Feb Mon 19-Feb Tue 20-Feb Wed 21-Feb Thu 22-Feb Fri 23-Feb Sat 24-Feb Sun 25-Feb Mon 26-Feb Tue 27-Feb Wed 28-Feb Thu 29-Feb Fri 0 5 0.15 0.25 0.35 0 Rainfall (in/hr) Total Monthly Rainfall: 1.92 40 inches 2 Avg Flow: 84 MGD Peak 402008 Flow: 0.16 MGD Min Flow: 11 MGD

0.35 0.25 0.15 5 0 1-Mar Sat 2-Mar Sun 3-Mar Mon 4-Mar Tue 5-Mar Wed 6-Mar Thu 7-Mar Fri 8-Mar Sat 9-Mar Sun 10-Mar Mon 11-Mar Tue 12-Mar Wed Monitoring Site: Site 4 13-Mar Thu Rain Flow BLFlow 14-Mar Fri 15-Mar Sat 0 5 0.15 0.25 0.35 0 Rainfall (in/hr) Monthly Flow Summary March, 2008 8 6 4 2 7 7 8 8 8 7 8 8 7 8 9 8 8 8 8 7 8 8 9 8 8 9 8 9 0 1.2 1.6 2.4 3/1 3/2 3/3 3/4 3/5 3/6 3/7 3/8 3/9 3/10 3/11 3/12 3/13 3/14 3/15 3/16 3/17 3/18 3/19 3/20 3/21 3/22 3/23 3/24 3/25 3/26 Flow (MGal) 3/27 3/28 3/29 3/30 3/31 Rainfall (in/day) 0.35 0.25 0.15 5 0 16-Mar Sun 17-Mar Mon 18-Mar Tue 19-Mar Wed 20-Mar Thu 21-Mar Fri 22-Mar Sat 23-Mar Sun 24-Mar Mon 25-Mar Tue 26-Mar Wed 27-Mar Thu 28-Mar Fri 29-Mar Sat 30-Mar Sun 31-Mar Mon 0 5 0.15 0.25 0.35 0 Rainfall (in/hr) Total Monthly Rainfall: 0.12 40 inches 3 Avg Flow: 81 MGD Peak 402008 Flow: 0.191 MGD Min Flow: 13 MGD

I/I Summary Monitoring Site: Site 4 Baseline, Realtime, and I/I Flows over Monitoring Period: Storm Event Rainfall: 0.76 inches 0.35 0.25 0.15 5 0 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.12 8 6 4 2 0 02/23 02/24 02/25 02/26 02/27 02/28 02/29 02/14 02/15 02/16 02/17 02/18 02/19 02/20 02/21 02/22 02/23 02/24 02/25 02/26 02/27 02/28 02/29 03/01 03/02 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.7 Rain (in/hr) Storm Event #1 Detail I/I Graph 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.7 Rain (in/hr) Storm Event #1 I/I Analysis Rainfall: Peak Flow: Peak I/I Rate: Peak Level: Total I/I: 0.76 inches 0.158 60 4.81 64,000 MGD MGD inches gallons PF: Pk I/I:ADWF: 4 0.78 d/d Ratio: 0.60 R-Value: 1.6% I/I per ADWF: 1.09

Average Dry Weather Flow Monitoring Site: Site 4 0.140 Weekday Weekend ADWF 0.120 Average Dry Weather Flow: 77 MGD 0 80 60 40 20 42 % Peak Measured Flow: 0.191 MGD 100 % 00 0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 Peak measured flow shown on following pages in weekly flow data graphs

Scatter Plots (Flow, Velocity vs. Depth) Monitoring Site: Site 4 1.40 1.20 1.00 Velocity (fps) 0 0.60 0 0 1.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 Level (in) 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.12 8 6 4 2 0 1.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 Level (in)

Level, Velocity and Flow From 2/11/2008 to 2/18/2008 Monitoring Site: Site 4 8.0 7.0 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Avg Level: 3.15 in. Peak 40 Level: 4.32 in. Min Level: 1.81 in. Lev Level (in) 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 1.0 3.0 2.5 Avg Velocity: 4 fps Peak 40 Velocity: 1.2 fps Min Velocity: 0.27 fps Vel Velocity (fps) 1.5 1.0 0.35 0.25 Rainfall (in/hr) 0.15 5 Total Weekly Rainfall: 01 40 inches Rain Flow BLFlow 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.7 0 2/11 2/12 2/13 2/14 2/15 2/16 2/17 Avg Flow: 74 MGD Peak 140 Flow: 0.136 MGD Min Flow: 11 MGD

Level, Velocity and Flow From 2/18/2008 to 2/25/2008 Monitoring Site: Site 4 8.0 7.0 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Avg Level: 3.4 in. Peak 40Level: 4.81 in. Min Level: 2 in. Lev Level (in) 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 1.0 3.0 2.5 Avg Velocity: 9 fps Peak 40 Velocity: 1.24 fps Min Velocity: 0.37 fps Vel Velocity (fps) 1.5 1.0 0.35 0.25 Rainfall (in/hr) 0.15 5 Total Weekly Rainfall: 1.922 40 inches Rain Flow BLFlow 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.7 0 2/18 2/19 2/20 2/21 2/22 2/23 2/24 Avg Flow: 87 MGD Peak 240 Flow: 0.16 MGD Min Flow: 16 MGD

Level, Velocity and Flow From 2/25/2008 to 3/3/2008 Monitoring Site: Site 4 8.0 7.0 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Avg Level: 3.44 in. Peak 40 Level: 4.84 in. Min Level: 8 in. Lev Level (in) 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 1.0 3.0 2.5 Avg Velocity: 5 fps Peak 40 Velocity: 1.15 fps Min Velocity: 0.38 fps Vel Velocity (fps) 1.5 1.0 0.35 0.25 Rainfall (in/hr) 0.15 5 Total Weekly Rainfall: 03 40 inches Rain Flow BLFlow 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.7 0 2/25 2/26 2/27 2/28 2/29 3/1 3/2 Avg Flow: 83 MGD Peak 340 Flow: 0.158 MGD Min Flow: 19 MGD

Level, Velocity and Flow From 3/3/2008 to 3/10/2008 Monitoring Site: Site 4 18.0 16.0 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Avg Level: 3.23 in. Peak 40 Level: 15.34 in. Min Level: 1.33 in. Lev Level (in) 14.0 1 1 8.0 6.0 4.0 3.0 2.5 Avg Velocity: 9 fps Peak 40 Velocity: 1.27 fps Min Velocity: 0.32 fps Vel Velocity (fps) 1.5 1.0 0.35 0.25 Rainfall (in/hr) 0.15 5 Total Weekly Rainfall: 04 40 inches Rain Flow BLFlow 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.7 0 3/3 3/4 3/5 3/6 3/7 3/8 3/9 Avg Flow: 77 MGD Peak 40 Flow: 0.191 MGD Min Flow: 15 MGD

Level, Velocity and Flow From 3/10/2008 to 3/17/2008 Monitoring Site: Site 4 8.0 7.0 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Avg Level: 2.85 in. Peak 40 Level: 4.4 in. Min Level: 1.33 in. Lev Level (in) 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 1.0 3.0 2.5 Avg Velocity: 1.04 fps Peak 40 Velocity: 1.28 fps Min Velocity: 0.6 fps Vel Velocity (fps) 1.5 1.0 0.35 0.25 Rainfall (in/hr) 0.15 5 Total Weekly Rainfall: 05 40 inches Rain Flow BLFlow 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.7 0 3/10 3/11 3/12 3/13 3/14 3/15 3/16 Avg Flow: 81 MGD Peak 540 Flow: 0.157 MGD Min Flow: 16 MGD

Level, Velocity and Flow From 3/17/2008 to 3/24/2008 Monitoring Site: Site 4 8.0 7.0 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Avg Level: 3.09 in. Peak 40 Level: 6.06 in. Min Level: 1.28 in. Lev Level (in) 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 1.0 3.0 2.5 Avg Velocity: 0.99 fps Peak 40 Velocity: 1.27 fps Min Velocity: 7 fps Vel Velocity (fps) 1.5 1.0 0.35 0.25 Rainfall (in/hr) 0.15 5 Total Weekly Rainfall: 16 40 inches Rain Flow BLFlow 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.7 0 3/17 3/18 3/19 3/20 3/21 3/22 3/23 Avg Flow: 84 MGD Peak 640 Flow: 0.159 MGD Min Flow: 13 MGD

Level, Velocity and Flow From 3/24/2008 to 3/31/2008 Monitoring Site: Site 4 8.0 7.0 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Avg Level: 3.37 in. Peak 40 Level: 5.07 in. Min Level: 1.84 in. Lev Level (in) 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 1.0 3.0 2.5 Avg Velocity: 1 fps Peak 40 Velocity: 1.17 fps Min Velocity: 0.64 fps Vel Velocity (fps) 1.5 1.0 0.35 0.25 Rainfall (in/hr) 0.15 5 Total Weekly Rainfall: 0.117 40 inches Rain Flow BLFlow 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.7 0 3/24 3/25 3/26 3/27 3/28 3/29 3/30 Avg Flow: 95 MGD Peak 740 Flow: 0.159 MGD Min Flow: 25 MGD

Monitoring Site: Manhole Address: Site 5 Temporary Flow Monitoring Study Sanitary Sewer Collection System 5th Street at Tuttle Lane Size/Type of Line: 8-inch Sanitary Sewer Pipe Data Summary Report Site 3 Site 4 Site 5 Site 2 Site 1

Site Information Report Monitoring Site: Site 5 Location: 5th Street at Tuttle Lane Street-level photo: Diameter: 8 inches Average Dry Weather Flow: 30 MGD Peak Measured Flow: 97 MGD Street map: Sanitary sewer map: Site 5 Plan view photo: Flow sketch: 6 N 8 8 Flow Meter

0.16 0.14 0.12 8 6 4 2 0 1-Feb Fri 2-Feb Sat 3-Feb Sun 4-Feb Mon 5-Feb Tue 6-Feb Wed 7-Feb Thu 8-Feb Fri 9-Feb Sat 10-Feb Sun 11-Feb Mon 12-Feb Tue Monitoring Site: Site 5 13-Feb Wed Rain Flow BLFlow 14-Feb Thu 15-Feb Fri 0 5 0.15 0.25 0.35 0 Rainfall (in/hr) Monthly Flow Summary February, 2008 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 5 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 1.2 1.6 2.4 2/1 2/2 2/3 2/4 2/5 2/6 2/7 2/8 2/9 2/10 2/11 2/12 2/13 2/14 2/15 2/16 2/17 2/18 2/19 2/20 2/21 2/22 2/23 2/24 Flow (MGal) 2/25 2/26 2/27 2/28 2/29 Rainfall (in/day) 0.16 0.14 0.12 8 6 4 2 0 16-Feb Sat 17-Feb Sun 18-Feb Mon 19-Feb Tue 20-Feb Wed 21-Feb Thu 22-Feb Fri 23-Feb Sat 24-Feb Sun 25-Feb Mon 26-Feb Tue 27-Feb Wed 28-Feb Thu 29-Feb Fri 0 5 0.15 0.25 0.35 0 Rainfall (in/hr) Total Monthly Rainfall: 1.92 41 inches 2 Avg Flow: 33 MGD Peak 412008 Flow: 97 MGD Min Flow: 05 MGD

0.16 0.14 0.12 8 6 4 2 0 1-Mar Sat 2-Mar Sun 3-Mar Mon 4-Mar Tue 5-Mar Wed 6-Mar Thu 7-Mar Fri 8-Mar Sat 9-Mar Sun 10-Mar Mon 11-Mar Tue 12-Mar Wed Monitoring Site: Site 5 13-Mar Thu Rain Flow BLFlow 14-Mar Fri 15-Mar Sat 0 5 0.15 0.25 0.35 0 Rainfall (in/hr) Monthly Flow Summary March, 2008 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 4 3 3 3 5 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 1.2 1.6 2.4 3/1 3/2 3/3 3/4 3/5 3/6 3/7 3/8 3/9 3/10 3/11 3/12 3/13 3/14 3/15 3/16 3/17 3/18 3/19 3/20 3/21 3/22 3/23 3/24 3/25 3/26 Flow (MGal) 3/27 3/28 3/29 3/30 3/31 Rainfall (in/day) 0.16 0.14 0.12 8 6 4 2 0 16-Mar Sun 17-Mar Mon 18-Mar Tue 19-Mar Wed 20-Mar Thu 21-Mar Fri 22-Mar Sat 23-Mar Sun 24-Mar Mon 25-Mar Tue 26-Mar Wed 27-Mar Thu 28-Mar Fri 29-Mar Sat 30-Mar Sun 31-Mar Mon 0 5 0.15 0.25 0.35 0 Rainfall (in/hr) Total Monthly Rainfall: 0.12 41 inches 3 Avg Flow: 32 MGD Peak 412008 Flow: 96 MGD Min Flow: 05 MGD

I/I Summary Monitoring Site: Site 5 Baseline, Realtime, and I/I Flows over Monitoring Period: Storm Event Rainfall: 0.76 inches 0.16 0.14 0.12 8 6 4 2 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.7 0.12 0.1 0.2 8 6 4 2 0 02/23 02/24 02/25 02/26 02/27 02/28 02/29 02/14 02/15 02/16 02/17 02/18 02/19 02/20 02/21 02/22 02/23 02/24 02/25 02/26 02/27 02/28 02/29 03/01 03/02 Rain (in/hr) Storm Event #1 Detail I/I Graph 0.3 Rain (in/hr) 0.6 0.7 Storm Event #1 I/I Analysis Rainfall: Peak Flow: Peak I/I Rate: Peak Level: Total I/I: 0.76 inches 97 55 1.95 13,000 MGD MGD inches gallons PF: Pk I/I:ADWF: 3.18 1.82 d/d Ratio: 0.24 R-Value: 1.0% I/I per ADWF: 6

60 50 40 30 20 10 00 Average Dry Weather Flow Weekday Weekend ADWF Monitoring Site: Site 5 Average Dry Weather Flow: 30 MGD 15 % Peak Measured Flow: 97 MGD 24 % Peak measured flow shown on following pages in weekly flow data graphs 0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00

Scatter Plots (Flow, Velocity vs. Depth) Monitoring Site: Site 5 2.50 0 Velocity (fps) 1.50 1.00 0 0 1.0 1.5 2.5 Level (in) 0.12 8 6 4 2 0 1.0 1.5 2.5 Level (in)

Level, Velocity and Flow From 2/11/2008 to 2/18/2008 Monitoring Site: Site 5 8.0 7.0 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Avg Level: 1.11 in. Peak 41 Level: 1.64 in. Min Level: 7 in. Lev Level (in) 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 1.0 3.5 3.0 Avg Velocity: 1.48 fps Peak 41 Velocity: 2.1 fps Min Velocity: 0.74 fps Vel 2.5 Velocity (fps) 1.5 1.0 0.16 0.14 0.12 Total Weekly Rainfall: 01 41 inches Rain Flow BLFlow 0.1 0.2 Rainfall (in/hr) 8 6 4 2 0 2/11 2/12 2/13 2/14 2/15 2/16 2/17 Avg Flow: 3 MGD Peak 141 Flow: 67 MGD Min Flow: 05 MGD 0.3 0.6 0.7

Level, Velocity and Flow From 2/18/2008 to 2/25/2008 Monitoring Site: Site 5 8.0 7.0 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Avg Level: 1.15 in. Peak 41 Level: 1.95 in. Min Level: 9 in. Lev Level (in) 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 1.0 3.5 3.0 Avg Velocity: 1.52 fps Peak 41 Velocity: 2.26 fps Min Velocity: fps Vel 2.5 Velocity (fps) 1.5 1.0 0.16 0.14 0.12 Total Weekly Rainfall: 1.922 41 inches Rain Flow BLFlow 0.1 0.2 Rainfall (in/hr) 8 6 4 2 0 2/18 2/19 2/20 2/21 2/22 2/23 2/24 Avg Flow: 33 MGD Peak 241 Flow: 97 MGD Min Flow: 07 MGD 0.3 0.6 0.7

Level, Velocity and Flow From 2/25/2008 to 3/3/2008 Monitoring Site: Site 5 8.0 7.0 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Avg Level: 1.22 in. Peak 41 Level: 1.74 in. Min Level: 0.64 in. Lev Level (in) 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 1.0 3.5 3.0 Avg Velocity: 1.56 fps Peak 41 Velocity: 2.11 fps Min Velocity: 0.7 fps Vel 2.5 Velocity (fps) 1.5 1.0 0.16 0.14 0.12 Total Weekly Rainfall: 03 41 inches Rain Flow BLFlow 0.1 0.2 Rainfall (in/hr) 8 6 4 2 0 2/25 2/26 2/27 2/28 2/29 3/1 3/2 Avg Flow: 36 MGD Peak 341 Flow: 72 MGD Min Flow: 07 MGD 0.3 0.6 0.7

Level, Velocity and Flow From 3/3/2008 to 3/10/2008 Monitoring Site: Site 5 8.0 7.0 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Avg Level: 1.16 in. Peak 41 Level: 1.94 in. Min Level: 6 in. Lev Level (in) 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 1.0 3.5 3.0 Avg Velocity: 1.47 fps Peak 41 Velocity: 2.26 fps Min Velocity: 6 fps Vel 2.5 Velocity (fps) 1.5 1.0 0.16 0.14 0.12 Total Weekly Rainfall: 04 41 inches Rain Flow BLFlow 0.1 0.2 Rainfall (in/hr) 8 6 4 2 0 3/3 3/4 3/5 3/6 3/7 3/8 3/9 Avg Flow: 32 MGD Peak 41 Flow: 96 MGD Min Flow: 06 MGD 0.3 0.6 0.7

Level, Velocity and Flow From 3/10/2008 to 3/17/2008 Monitoring Site: Site 5 8.0 7.0 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Avg Level: 1.17 in. Peak 41 Level: 1.66 in. Min Level: in. Lev Level (in) 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 1.0 3.5 3.0 Avg Velocity: 1.5 fps Peak 41Velocity: 2.14 fps Min Velocity: 0.62 fps Vel 2.5 Velocity (fps) 1.5 1.0 0.16 0.14 0.12 Total Weekly Rainfall: 05 41 inches Rain Flow BLFlow 0.1 0.2 Rainfall (in/hr) 8 6 4 2 0 3/10 3/11 3/12 3/13 3/14 3/15 3/16 Avg Flow: 32 MGD Peak 541 Flow: 68 MGD Min Flow: 05 MGD 0.3 0.6 0.7

Level, Velocity and Flow From 3/17/2008 to 3/24/2008 Monitoring Site: Site 5 8.0 7.0 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Avg Level: 1.18 in. Peak 41 Level: 1.77 in. Min Level: 0.62 in. Lev Level (in) 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 1.0 3.5 3.0 Avg Velocity: 1.46 fps Peak 41 Velocity: 2.1 fps Min Velocity: 0.75 fps Vel 2.5 Velocity (fps) 1.5 1.0 0.16 0.14 0.12 Total Weekly Rainfall: 16 41 inches Rain Flow BLFlow 0.1 0.2 Rainfall (in/hr) 8 6 4 2 0 3/17 3/18 3/19 3/20 3/21 3/22 3/23 Avg Flow: 32 MGD Peak 641 Flow: 7 MGD Min Flow: 06 MGD 0.3 0.6 0.7

Level, Velocity and Flow From 3/24/2008 to 3/31/2008 Monitoring Site: Site 5 8.0 7.0 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Avg Level: 1.15 in. Peak 41 Level: 1.57 in. Min Level: 0.74 in. Lev Level (in) 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 1.0 3.5 3.0 Avg Velocity: 1.42 fps Peak 41 Velocity: 6 fps Min Velocity: 0.74 fps Vel 2.5 Velocity (fps) 1.5 1.0 0.16 0.14 0.12 Total Weekly Rainfall: 0.117 41 inches Rain Flow BLFlow 0.1 0.2 Rainfall (in/hr) 8 6 4 2 0 3/24 3/25 3/26 3/27 3/28 3/29 3/30 Avg Flow: 3 MGD Peak 741 Flow: 55 MGD Min Flow: 08 MGD 0.3 0.6 0.7

Site 3 Site 4 Site 5 Site 2 Site 1 Western Region 1999 Harrison Street, Suite 975 Oakland, CA 94612 510.903.6600 Tel 510.903.6601 Fax Southwest Region 8291 Aero Place, Suite 110 San Diego, CA 92123 858.576.0226 Tel 858.576.0004 Fax Northwest Region 14900 Interurban Avenue, Suite 268 Seattle, WA 96818 206.674.4560 Tel 206.674.4561 Fax South Central Region One Riverway, Suite 1700 Houston, TX 77056 713.840.6490 Tel 713.840.6491 Fax vaengineering.com

Appendix B Average Daily Dry Weather Flow Calibration Figures

0.60 0 0 M:\Colusa\PDF\Collection System Model Figures\Dry Weather Calibration_Basin 1.pdf 122308 MLM 0 00:00 2/14/2008 Legend Observed Flow Simulated Flow 06:00 12:00 18:00 24:00 Figure B-1 Colusa Dry Weather Flow Calibration for Basin 1

0.15 0.13 0.11 M:\Colusa\PDF\Collection System Model Figures\Dry Weather Calibration_Basin 2.pdf 122308 MLM 9 7 5 00:00 2/14/2008 Legend Observed Flow Simulated Flow 06:00 12:00 18:00 24:00 Figure B-2 Colusa Dry Weather Flow Calibration for Basin 2

0 M:\Colusa\PDF\Collection System Model Figures\Dry Weather Calibration_Basin 3.pdf 122308 MLM 0 00:00 2/14/2008 Legend Observed Flow Simulated Flow 06:00 12:00 18:00 00:00 Figure B-3 Colusa Dry Weather Flow Calibration for Basin 3

0.150 0 M:\Colusa\PDF\Collection System Model Figures\Dry Weather Calibration_Basin 4.pdf 122308 MLM 50 00 00:00 2/14/2008 Legend Observed Flow Simulated Flow 06:00 12:00 18:00 00:00 Figure B-4 Colusa Dry Weather Flow Calibration for Basin 4

6 5 4 3 M:\Colusa\PDF\Collection System Model Figures\Dry Weather Calibration_Basin 5.pdf 122308 MLM 2 1 0 00:00 2/14/2008 Legend Observed Flow Simulated Flow 06:00 12:00 18:00 00:00 Figure B-5 Colusa Dry Weather Flow Calibration for Basin 5

Appendix C Peak Hourly Wet Weather Flow Calibration Figures

Rainfall Event February 19-24, 2008 Rainfall (in/hr) 00 50 0 0.150 0 Simulated Peak Hourly Wet Weather Flow = 0.63 MGD Observed Peak Hourly Wet Weather Flow = 0.63 MGD 0.60 M:\Colusa\PDF\Collection System Model Figures\Wet Weather Calibration_Basin 1.pdf 122308 MLM 0 0 2/14/2008 2/19/2008 2/24/2008 2/29/2008 Legend Observed Flow Simulated Flow Figure C-1 Colusa Wet Weather Flow Calibration for Basin 1

Rainfall Event February 19-24, 2008 Rainfall (in/hr) 00 50 0 0.150 0 Observed Peak Hourly Wet Weather Flow = 0.19 MGD Simulated Peak Hourly Wet Weather Flow = MGD 0.150 M:\Colusa\PDF\Collection System Model Figures\Wet Weather Calibration_Basin 2.pdf 122308 MLM 0 50 00 2/14/2008 2/19/2008 2/24/2008 2/29/2008 Legend Observed Flow Simulated Flow Figure C-2 Colusa Wet Weather Flow Calibration for Basin 2

Rainfall Event February 19-24, 2008 Rainfall (in/hr) 00 50 0 0.150 0 Simulated Peak Hourly Wet Weather Flow = 0.37 MGD Observed Peak Hourly Wet Weather Flow = 0.36 MGD M:\Colusa\PDF\Collection System Model Figures\Wet Weather Calibration_Basin 3.pdf 122308 MLM 0 2/14/2008 2/19/2008 2/24/2008 2/29/2008 Legend Observed Flow Simulated Flow Figure C-3 Colusa Wet Weather Flow Calibration for Basin 3

Rainfall Event February 19-24, 2008 Rainfall (in/hr) 00 50 0 0.150 0 Simulated Peak Hourly Wet Weather Flow = 0.16 MGD Observed Peak Hourly Wet Weather Flow = 0.15 MGD 0.150 M:\Colusa\PDF\Collection System Model Figures\Wet Weather Calibration_Basin 4.pdf 122308 MLM 0 50 00 2/14/2008 2/19/2008 2/24/2008 2/29/2008 Legend Observed Flow Simulated Flow Figure C-4 Colusa Wet Weather Flow Calibration for Basin 4

Rainfall Event February 19-24, 2008 Rainfall (in/hr) 00 50 0 0.150 8 Observed Peak Hourly Wet Weather Flow = 72 MGD Simulated Peak Hourly Wet Weather Flow = 72 MGD 6 M:\Colusa\PDF\Collection System Model Figures\Wet Weather Calibration_Basin 5.pdf 122308 MLM 4 2 0 2/14/2008 2/19/2008 2/24/2008 2/29/2008 Legend Observed Flow Simulated Flow Figure C-5 Colusa Wet Weather Flow Calibration for Basin 5

Appendix D Hydraulic Model Results

Appendix D Hydraulic Model Results Table D-1 City of Colusa Modeled Manhole Attributes (a) MH ID Rim Elev. Floor Elev. Max Water Level (ft) (ft) (ft) (b) E04-004 63 53.26 53.36 E05-002 61 56.51 56.63 F04-000 56.93 50.36 50.72 F04-001 60.94 52.80 52.94 F04-005 60.95 52.64 52.78 F04-006 62.65 52.12 52.25 F04-017 61.11 51.70 51.90 F04-024 58.92 51.87 50 F04-025 58.96 51.25 51.48 F04-033 57.40 51.20 51.39 F04-034 57.62 57 50.94 F04-049 55.87 51.57 50 F04-050 57.40 52.60 52.92 F04-051 55.94 49.69 58 F05-001 59.92 56.03 56.19 F05-002 59.48 56.63 56.70 F05-003 64 57.51 57.58 F05-004 63.79 58.30 58.37 F05-006 59.52 55.68 55.92 F05-007 59.52 56.04 56.12 F05-008 61 57.12 57.19 F05-009 63 59.14 59.21 F05-011 58.69 55.09 55.41 F05-012 59.84 55.72 55.83 F05-013 60.26 56.44 56.53 F05-014 59.49 57.00 57.07 F05-016 58.76 54.62 54.90 F05-017 59.25 55.54 55.65 F05-018 59.15 56.12 56.22 F05-019 59.93 57.02 57.09 F05-021 58.38 53.90 54.34 F05-022 58.40 54.87 54.98 F05-023 58.60 55.57 55.66 F05-024 57.91 56.04 56.11 F05-025 59.01 53.15 53.52 F05-026 58.26 53.71 54.08 F05-027 57.75 54.33 54.45 F05-028 58.02 55.00 55.10 F05-029 57.31 55.52 55.59 G04-006 55.12 51.10 51.68 G04-008 55.06 52 50.63 G04-009 55.97 49.27 49.62 G04-011 54.55 50.99 51.36 G04-013 54.95 49.70 49.91 G04-014 56.08 48.63 49.07 G04-017 54.31 50.37 51 March 2009 COLU08-002 D-1 City of Colusa Wastewater Collection System Master Plan

Appendix D Hydraulic Model Results MH ID Table D-1 City of Colusa Modeled Manhole Attributes (a) Rim Elev. (ft) Floor Elev. (ft) Max Water Level (ft) (b) G04-018 54.73 49.04 49.27 G04-019 56.02 48.28 48.75 G04-020 54.61 50.69 57 G04-026 54.15 49.97 56 G04-027 53.13 47.74 48.22 G04-028 53.36 49.75 50.26 G04-030 52.50 48.49 48.61 G04-031 52.50 47.27 47.82 G04-037 53.15 49.11 49.70 G05-004 57.09 53.44 53.58 G05-005 57.59 55.71 55.78 G05-010 56.10 52.88 53.08 G05-011 57.09 53.45 53.52 G05-014 55.78 49.24 49.32 G05-018 56.23 51.23 51.31 G05-019 55.70 52.40 52.70 G05-020 55.73 52.89 52.96 G05-021 55.40 48.35 48.49 G05-022 55.96 49.41 49.54 G05-028 55.49 52.13 52.37 G05-029 56.31 50.31 50.38 G05-030 56.24 49.49 49.56 G05-031 55.11 47.55 47.71 G05-032 55.91 48.82 48.89 G05-033 55.14 48.12 48.19 G05-034 56.14 46.57 46.75 G05-035 55.08 47.65 47.73 G05-041 55.11 51.36 51.75 G06-001 58.79 50.34 51 H04-002 53.43 47.74 47.87 H04-003 52.80 47.35 47.50 H04-004 52.24 46.82 47.38 H04-005 50 47.48 47.99 H04-008 53.32 48.09 48.57 H04-009 53.57 48.69 49.17 H04-010 54.27 48.46 48.76 H04-011 59 46.42 47.23 H04-014 53.44 46.98 47.08 H04-015 56.72 47.58 47.90 H04-016 51.62 45.19 47.01 H04-017 56.55 46.96 47.30 H04-018 53.37 46.60 47.01 H04-019 54.58 46.00 47.00 H04-020 55.71 46.38 47.19 H04-021 54.97 45.22 47.00 March 2009 COLU08-002 D-2 City of Colusa Wastewater Collection System Master Plan

Appendix D Hydraulic Model Results MH ID Table D-1 City of Colusa Modeled Manhole Attributes (a) Rim Elev. (ft) Floor Elev. (ft) Max Water Level (ft) (b) H05-001 57.57 50.26 57 H05-003 55.93 50.60 50.98 H05-004 55.55 51.18 51.47 H05-005 55.28 44.51 44.71 H05-006 54.94 45.00 45.20 H05-009 57.32 38.65 41.75 H05-011 54.41 49.13 56 H05-012 54.87 48.57 55 H05-015 59 43.57 44.35 H05-016 54.07 43.43 44.24 H05-018 55.36 48.26 48.49 H05-019 54.02 48.56 48.81 H05-020 53.79 49.80 49.98 H05-021 54.26 49.80 50.34 H05-022 53.29 48.57 57 H05-023 53.78 47.59 50.76 H05-024 53.34 48.52 57 H05-027 55.00 46.77 47.01 H05-028 53.83 45.99 46.47 H05-029 53.36 47.22 47.49 H05-030 53.88 48.20 48.30 H05-031 53.70 46.52 59 H05-032 52.69 49.00 49.07 H05-033 52.51 48.93 56 H05-034 53.50 47.80 55 H05-035 53.43 47.80 52 H05-036 53.22 48.35 53 H05-037 52.67 48.81 54 H05-039 53.38 47.33 53 I04-001 55.32 44.47 47.09 I04-002 54.47 44.47 47.11 I04-003 55.38 44.43 46.99 I04-004 54.61 44.90 47.14 I04-005 52.19 44.14 46.90 I04-006 52.83 40 46.78 I04-008 53.46 47.02 47.73 I04-009 53.14 47.03 47.74 I04-010 51.81 46.88 47.54 I04-011 51.74 46.14 46.81 I04-013 51.67 46.02 46.70 I05-002 52.89 46.71 47.28 I05-006 53.25 45.20 52 I05-007 53.15 46.61 52 I05-008 53.38 47.33 52 I05-009 52.90 46.35 47.24 March 2009 COLU08-002 D-3 City of Colusa Wastewater Collection System Master Plan

Appendix D Hydraulic Model Results MH ID Table D-1 City of Colusa Modeled Manhole Attributes (a) Rim Elev. (ft) Floor Elev. (ft) Max Water Level (ft) (b) I05-010 52.80 46.61 47.25 I05-011 53.65 48.88 48.95 I05-012 52.74 47.40 53 I05-013 53.04 44.77 50 I05-014 52.55 47.89 54 I05-015 52.31 48.44 54 I05-016 53.18 49.18 49.25 I05-017 52.91 47.84 53 I05-018 52.89 47.30 47.56 I05-019 52.67 48.52 48.60 I05-020 51.48 42.15 49.57 I05-021 50.66 43.48 49.57 I05-022 52.51 49.18 54 I05-023 52.65 44.32 50.34 I05-024 52.59 41.16 5 I05-025 53.61 47.71 47.85 I05-030 52.47 46.95 50.31 I05-031 52.30 43.78 50.31 I05-032 51.49 46.98 49.71 I05-033 51.56 40.23 49.56 I05-036 52.16 44.40 52.13 I05-037 52.28 43.42 5 I05-038 51.78 46.11 50.31 I05-040 52.24 42.63 5 I05-041 52.28 46.30 49.40 I05-042 51.75 35 49.38 I05-043 59 37.10 49.40 I05-047 52.43 43.27 50.27 I05-048 52.53 43.23 50.26 I05-054 51.20 45.29 50.23 I05-055 51.29 46.24 5 I05-056 52.34 43.41 5 I05-057 58 44.38 5 I05-060 52.44 43.59 5 I05-062 51.93 46.91 50.18 I05-066 51.60 37.95 49.63 I05-067 51.49 46.24 49.86 I06-001 52.34 48.25 48.74 I06-005 52.64 49.15 49.59 Indian Oaks PS 50 30.90 5 J03-001 51.67 45.19 45.99 J03-002 51.67 45.05 45.85 J03-003 58 44.51 44.79 J03-004 50.17 43.46 44.32 J03-005 52.70 40.65 44.22 March 2009 COLU08-002 D-4 City of Colusa Wastewater Collection System Master Plan

Appendix D Hydraulic Model Results MH ID Table D-1 City of Colusa Modeled Manhole Attributes (a) Rim Elev. (ft) Floor Elev. (ft) Max Water Level (ft) (b) J03-006 51.00 45.08 45.78 J03-007 51.07 44.94 45.46 J05-001 53.26 44.60 50.29 J05-002 51.95 43.96 5 J05-003 51.99 42.72 5 J05-004 53.21 44.61 50.29 J05-007 51.78 42.70 50.19 J05-012 49.83 45.50 50.12 J05-014 50.75 38.84 49.86 J05-020 52.49 40 5 J05-026 51.47 43.91 57 J05-027 52.96 41.86 58 J05-028 49.52 44.40 51 J05-031 50.27 39.70 49.87 J05-033 53.51 41.37 52 J05-040 49.65 45.54 51 J05-041 49.87 40.36 49.87 J05-043 54.82 40.70 49.93 J05-045 49.82 46.09 52 J05-048 54.70 40.60 49.92 J05-049 49.48 41.03 49.87 J05-058 49.49 43.23 49.81 J05-061 54.12 40.11 49.85 J05-062 49.87 42.60 49.81 J05-063 49.96 45.34 49.97 J05-064 49.38 41.92 49.80 K05-001 53.48 39.75 49.81 K05-003 53.25 39.63 49.79 K05-004 49.98 40.94 49.79 K05-005 52.90 39.04 49.72 K05-006 52.29 38.43 49.61 K05-007 51.97 29.44 49.56 K05-012 53.23 39.58 49.78 L04-006 51.00 38.40 WWTP (a) MH = manhole, WWTP = wastewater treatment plant. (b) Model results of existing level of development at 10-year, 6-hour design storm. March 2009 COLU08-002 D-5 City of Colusa Wastewater Collection System Master Plan

Appendix D Hydraulic Model Results Table D-2 City of Colusa (a), (d) Modeled Sewer Line Attributes US MH ID DS MH ID Length Diameter Roughness US Invert DS Invert Full Pipe Capacity Max Flow Max Velocity Slope (ft/ft) (ft) (in) (n) (ft) (ft) (MGD) (MGD) (c) (b), (c) (fps) E04-004 F04-001 379.2 6.0 13 53.26 52.80 012 0.13 1 0.24 E05-002 F05-001 148.3 6.0 13 56.51 56.03 032 0.21 2 2 F04-000 F04-051 339.4 1 13 50.36 49.99 011 7 0.18 2.24 F04-001 F04-005 128.0 6.0 13 52.80 52.64 013 0.13 2 0.60 F04-005 F04-006 40 6.0 13 52.64 52.12 013 0.13 2 0.67 F04-006 F04-017 197.3 1 13 52.12 51.82 015 5 2 9 F04-017 F04-025 359.9 1 13 51.70 51.25 013 0 6 0.76 F04-024 F04-033 339.7 6.0 13 51.87 51.27 018 0.15 2 5 F04-025 F04-034 339.8 1 13 51.25 50.67 017 9 8 1.04 F04-033 F04-034 401.1 6.0 13 51.20 50.67 013 0.13 3 0.62 F04-034 F04-000 34 1 13 57 56 000 8 0.15 1.76 F04-049 G04-006 340.3 8.0 13 51.57 51.27 009 0.23 0.17 1.37 F04-050 F04-049 383.2 8.0 13 52.60 51.74 022 0.37 0.16 2.23 F04-051 G04-009 34 1 13 49.69 49.27 012 0 0.22 1.53 F05-001 F05-006 191.7 8.0 13 56.03 55.68 018 0.33 4 8 F05-002 F05-001 380.1 6.0 13 56.63 56.08 015 0.14 0 6 F05-003 F05-002 398.8 6.0 13 57.51 56.69 021 0.16 0 0 F05-004 F05-003 384.5 6.0 13 58.30 57.55 020 0.16 0 0 F05-006 F05-011 360.1 8.0 13 55.68 55.20 013 0.29 7 1.47 F05-007 F05-006 380.2 6.0 13 56.04 55.83 006 9 0 0.22 F05-008 F05-007 40 6.0 13 57.12 56.10 026 0.18 0 0 F05-009 F05-008 324.9 6.0 13 59.14 57.14 062 0.28 0 0 F05-011 F05-016 339.4 8.0 13 55.09 54.79 009 0.23 1.98 F05-012 F05-011 379.5 6.0 13 55.72 55.23 013 0.13 1 3 F05-013 F05-012 40 6.0 13 56.44 55.74 018 0.15 1 0.31 F05-014 F05-013 320.3 6.0 13 57.00 56.53 015 0.14 0 0 F05-016 F05-021 340.6 8.0 13 54.62 53.90 021 0.36 0.13 1 F05-017 F05-016 379.2 6.0 13 55.54 54.79 020 0.16 1 0.77 F05-018 F05-017 40 6.0 13 56.12 55.60 013 0.13 1 0 F05-019 F05-018 325.8 6.0 13 57.02 56.16 026 0.19 0 0 F05-021 F05-026 339.9 8.0 13 53.90 53.71 006 0.18 0.14 1.12 F05-022 F05-021 379.9 6.0 13 54.87 54.36 013 0.13 1 5 F05-023 F05-022 400.3 6.0 13 55.57 54.95 016 0.14 0 0.37 March 2009 COLU08-002 D-1 City of Colusa Wastewater Collection System Master Plan

Appendix D Hydraulic Model Results Table D-2 City of Colusa (a), (d) Modeled Sewer Line Attributes US MH ID DS MH ID Length Diameter Roughness US Invert DS Invert Full Pipe Capacity Max Flow Max Velocity Slope (ft/ft) (ft) (in) (n) (ft) (ft) (MGD) (MGD) (c) (b), (c) (fps) F05-024 F05-023 300.9 6.0 13 56.04 55.60 015 0.14 0 0 F05-025 F04-050 398.2 8.0 13 53.15 52.64 013 0.28 0.16 1.78 F05-026 F05-025 418.6 8.0 13 53.71 53.18 013 0.28 0.16 1.35 F05-027 F05-026 380.2 6.0 13 54.33 53.97 010 0.11 1 0.71 F05-028 F05-027 399.5 6.0 13 55.00 54.36 016 0.15 1 6 F05-029 F05-028 324.7 6.0 13 55.52 55.02 015 0.14 0 0 G04-006 G04-011 339.7 8.0 13 51.10 51.05 002 9 0.18 1.80 G04-008 G04-013 340.2 6.0 13 52 49.70 024 0.18 1 0.24 G04-009 G04-014 340.2 1 13 49.27 48.63 019 0.61 0.22 1.15 G04-011 G04-017 340.1 8.0 13 50.99 50.37 018 0.33 0.19 1.20 G04-013 G04-018 339.7 6.0 13 49.70 49.12 017 0.15 5 1.48 G04-014 G04-019 34 1 13 48.63 48.36 008 0 0.22 1.43 G04-017 G04-028 339.5 8.0 13 50.37 49.93 013 0.28 0.22 2.30 G04-018 G04-019 399.1 6.0 13 49.04 48.36 017 0.15 6 7 G04-019 G04-027 339.5 1 13 48.28 47.82 014 2 0.31 1.84 G04-020 G04-017 380.3 6.0 13 50.69 50.37 008 0.11 2 0.16 G04-026 G04-030 339.5 6.0 13 49.97 48.54 042 0.24 1 1 G04-027 G04-031 340.9 1 13 47.74 47.27 014 3 0.32 1.30 G04-028 G04-037 340.6 8.0 13 49.75 49.44 009 0.24 0.23 2.56 G04-030 H04-002 331.8 6.0 13 48.49 47.90 018 0.15 1 0.73 G04-031 H04-004 339.8 1 13 47.27 47.00 008 0 0.32 2.51 G04-037 H04-009 34 8.0 13 49.11 48.89 007 0.24 2.60 G05-004 G05-010 34 8.0 13 53.44 52.94 015 2 0.67 G05-005 G05-004 346.9 6.0 13 55.71 53.57 062 0.28 0 0 G05-010 G05-019 339.5 8.0 13 52.88 52.55 010 0.24 4 1.27 G05-011 G05-010 347.2 6.0 13 53.45 52.94 015 0.14 0 2 G05-014 G05-021 170.1 8.0 13 49.24 48.67 034 5 1 0.37 G05-018 G04-020 258.8 6.0 13 51.23 50.73 019 0.16 0 0.14 G05-019 G05-028 340.3 8.0 13 52.40 52.28 004 0.15 7 1.76 G05-020 G05-019 347.3 6.0 13 52.89 52.55 010 0.11 0-1 G05-021 G05-031 338.7 1 13 48.35 47.55 024 0.69 3 0.69 G05-022 G05-021 386.8 1 13 49.41 48.67 019 0.62 3 0.99 G05-028 G05-041 34 8.0 13 52.13 51.52 018 0.33 8 1.56 March 2009 COLU08-002 D-2 City of Colusa Wastewater Collection System Master Plan

Appendix D Hydraulic Model Results Table D-2 City of Colusa (a), (d) Modeled Sewer Line Attributes US MH ID DS MH ID Length Diameter Roughness US Invert DS Invert Full Pipe Capacity Max Flow Max Velocity Slope (ft/ft) (ft) (in) (n) (ft) (ft) (MGD) (MGD) (c) (b), (c) (fps) G05-029 G05-030 55.1 8.0 13 50.31 49.90 074 0.67 0 0 G05-030 G05-032 241.4 8.0 13 49.49 49.03 019 0.34 0 0 G05-031 G05-034 419.7 1 13 47.55 46.64 022 0.66 4 1.32 G05-032 G05-033 207.2 8.0 13 48.82 48.27 027 0 0 0 G05-033 G05-035 127.5 8.0 13 48.12 47.65 037 7 0 0 G05-034 H05-006 559.9 1 13 46.57 45.59 018 9 6 1.51 G05-035 G05-031 31.2 8.0 13 47.65 47.55 032 4 0 0 G05-041 H05-004 340.1 8.0 13 51.36 51.26 003 0.13 1.77 G06-001 G05-022 379.6 1 13 50.34 49.52 022 0.66 0 0 H04-002 H04-003 34 6.0 13 47.74 47.35 011 0.12 1 0.38 H04-003 H04-004 472.3 6.0 13 47.35 47.00 007 2 0.15 H04-004 H04-011 126.5 1 13 46.82 46.50 025 1.16 0.60 1.56 H04-005 H04-004 394.7 8.0 13 47.48 47.00 012 0.27 0.25 2.35 H04-008 H04-005 425.1 8.0 13 48.09 47.48 014 0.25 1.32 H04-009 H04-008 42 8.0 13 48.69 48.12 014 0.29 0.24 1.52 H04-010 H04-015 446.0 8.0 13 48.46 47.63 019 0.34 0.13 1.56 H04-011 H04-016 718.9 15.0 13 46.42 46.24 003 0.66 0.60 2.95 H04-014 H04-018 123.6 8.0 13 46.98 46.60 031 3 1 0.28 H04-015 H04-017 420.2 8.0 13 47.58 46.96 015 0.13 1.15 H04-016 I04-006 1502.1 15.0 13 45.19 43.93 008 1.21 7 2.86 H04-017 H04-020 479.3 8.0 13 46.96 46.39 012 0.27 0.13 1.73 H04-018 H04-019 489.7 8.0 13 46.60 46.00 012 0.27 4 0.71 H04-019 H04-021 494.3 8.0 13 46.00 45.22 016 0.31 5 0.64 H04-020 I04-002 499.5 8.0 13 46.38 44.77 032 4 0.13 1.31 H04-021 I04-003 505.3 8.0 13 45.22 44.65 011 0.26 5 0.75 H05-001 H04-010 78 8.0 13 50.26 49.23 013 0.28 0.12 7 H05-003 H05-001 402.8 8.0 13 50.60 50.38 006 0.18 0.11 6 H05-004 H05-003 377.0 8.0 13 51.18 50.64 014 0.11 0.94 H05-005 H05-009 187.6 1 13 44.51 43.22 069 1.17 0.13 6 H05-006 H05-005 72.2 1 13 45.00 44.51 068 1.17 0.13 6 H05-011 H05-022 442.7 8.0 13 49.13 48.89 005 0.18 0.23 1.68 H05-011 H05-012 14.5 1 13 49.13 48.71 289 3.92 2 9.06 H05-012 H05-023 434.4 1 13 48.57 47.59 023 1.09 4 1.97 March 2009 COLU08-002 D-3 City of Colusa Wastewater Collection System Master Plan

Appendix D Hydraulic Model Results Table D-2 City of Colusa (a), (d) Modeled Sewer Line Attributes US MH ID DS MH ID Length Diameter Roughness US Invert DS Invert Full Pipe Capacity Max Flow Max Velocity Slope (ft/ft) (ft) (in) (n) (ft) (ft) (MGD) (MGD) (c) (b), (c) (fps) H05-015 H05-016 60.2 8.0 13 43.57 43.48 015 0.32 1.36 H05-016 H05-009 328.3 8.0 13 43.43 43.22 006 0.32 2.85 H05-018 H05-029 505.2 8.0 13 48.26 47.28 019 0.34 8 1.37 H05-019 H05-018 215.7 8.0 13 48.56 48.28 013 0.28 8 1.31 H05-020 H05-021 415.8 6.0 13 49.86 49.80 001 4-8 -0.72 H05-020 H05-019 242.8 8.0 13 49.80 48.63 048 4 8 1.56 H05-021 H05-022 280.1 6.0 13 49.80 48.89 033 0.21-9 -0.63 H05-022 H05-024 37.0 1 13 48.57 48.52 014 5 0.18 1.07 H05-023 H05-031 487.2 1 13 47.59 46.78 017 0.94 9 2.90 H05-024 H05-034 474.7 1 13 48.52 47.80 015 0.90 0.16 9 H05-027 H05-028 27.6 8.0 13 46.77 46.10 243 1.22 0.31 3.06 H05-028 H05-015 1064.5 8.0 13 45.99 43.57 023 0.37 0.32 1.36 H05-029 I05-002 331.5 8.0 13 47.22 46.71 015 0.31 0.94 H05-030 H05-029 399.6 8.0 13 48.20 47.28 023 0.37 1 0.66 H05-031 I05-006 497.2 1 13 46.52 45.20 027 1.19 1 1.82 H05-032 H05-030 348.3 8.0 13 49.00 48.23 022 0.37 0 0 H05-033 H05-034 375.5 8.0 13 48.93 48.36 015-5 - H05-034 H05-039 277.9 1 13 47.80 47.33 017 8 0.14 1.54 H05-035 I05-008 477.1 8.0 13 47.80 47.71 002 0.11 6 1.51 H05-036 H05-035 270.9 8.0 13 48.35 47.83 019 0.34 4 2 H05-037 H05-036 413.8 8.0 13 48.81 48.35 011 0.26-4 1 H05-039 I05-007 197.7 1 13 47.33 46.61 036 1.39 0.14 1.84 I04-001 I04-003 902.7 1 13 44.47 44.43 000 0.15 0.26 0.72 I04-002 I04-001 202.3 1 13 44.63 44.47 008 0.65 0.25 8 I04-003 I04-005 615.6 1 13 44.43 44.14 005 0 0.33 1 I04-004 I04-002 248.1 1 13 44.90 44.77 005 0.32 0.16 1.31 I04-005 I04-006 561.4 1 13 44.14 43.93 004 5 0.38 2.61 I04-008 I04-010 193.3 18.0 13 47.02 46.92 005 1.54 6 2.42 I04-009 I04-008 4.7 18.0 13 47.03 47.02 021 3.14 0.98 3.17 I04-010 I04-011 738.8 18.0 13 46.88 46.14 010 2.15 6 1.74 I04-011 I04-013 119.8 18.0 13 46.14 46.04 008 1.96 6 1.81 I04-013 J03-001 752.1 18.0 13 46.02 45.32 009 7 6 1.80 I05-002 I05-009 218.2 8.0 13 46.71 46.35 017 0.32 0.11 0.74 March 2009 COLU08-002 D-4 City of Colusa Wastewater Collection System Master Plan

Appendix D Hydraulic Model Results Table D-2 City of Colusa (a), (d) Modeled Sewer Line Attributes US MH ID DS MH ID Length Diameter Roughness US Invert DS Invert Full Pipe Capacity Max Flow Max Velocity Slope (ft/ft) (ft) (in) (n) (ft) (ft) (MGD) (MGD) (c) (b), (c) (fps) I05-006 I05-013 176.8 15.0 13 45.20 44.77 024 6 0.76 1.66 I05-007 I05-006 9.5 8.0 13 46.61 46.35 274 1.29 0.19 3.32 I05-008 I05-006 22.2 8.0 13 47.33 46.67 298 1.35 0.14 3.35 I05-009 I04-004 908.7 1 13 46.35 44.93 016 6 0.16 6 I05-010 I05-009 113.1 8.0 13 46.61 46.35 023 0.37 5 0.63 I05-011 I05-010 562.7 8.0 13 48.88 47.27 029 2 0 0 I05-012 I05-008 172.6 8.0 13 47.40 47.33 004 0.16 8 1.91 I05-013 I05-023 487.6 15.0 13 44.77 44.32 009 1.27 0.77 1.92 I05-014 I05-012 270.1 8.0 13 47.89 47.40 018 0.33 8 0.77 I05-015 I05-014 29 8.0 13 48.44 47.89 019 0.34 6 9 I05-016 I05-019 231.6 8.0 13 49.18 48.70 021 0.36 0 0 I05-017 I05-007 318.4 1 13 47.84 46.61 039 1.43 8 0.75 I05-018 I05-010 331.9 8.0 13 47.30 47.27 001 7 4 1.32 I05-019 I05-018 549.5 8.0 13 48.52 47.39 021 0.35 0 0.12 I05-020 I05-033 484.4 8.0 13 42.15 40.23 040 9-0.11 1.09 I05-021 I05-020 294.9 8.0 13 43.48 42.22 043 1-9 1.22 I05-022 I05-017 346.8 8.0 13 49.18 47.84 039 9-3 -0.14 I05-023 I05-031 362.7 15.0 13 44.32 43.78 015 1.61 1.02 2.48 I05-024 Indian Oaks PS 24.1 8.0 13 41.16 39.55 669 2 0.75 8.00 I05-024 I05-023 13.7 8.0 13 46.87 46.45 307 1.37 0.68 2.90 I05-025 I05-018 26 8.0 13 47.71 47.39 012 0.27 2 0.62 I05-030 I05-038 251.2 8.0 13 46.95 46.15 032 4-1.45 I05-031 I05-037 126.7 15.0 13 43.78 43.42 028 2.23 0.99 1.83 I05-032 I05-033 141.1 8.0 13 46.98 40.23 479 1.71 0.26 1.71 I05-032 I05-067 198.7 8.0 13 46.98 46.27 036 7-0.27-1.14 I05-033 I05-042 169.2 8.0 13 40.23 39.55 040 0 0.26 2.51 I05-036 I05-037 13.6 4.0 13 44.40 44.36 029 7 4 7.97 I05-037 I05-047 134.9 15.0 13 43.42 43.27 011 1.39 1.18 2.26 I05-038 I05-040 228.7 8.0 13 46.11 45.38 032 4-0.12 1.59 I05-040 I05-024 512.4 8.0 13 42.63 41.16 029 2 0 8.05 I05-041 I05-043 13.2 8.0 13 46.30 46.26 030 3-2 2 I05-043 I05-042 39.3 8.0 13 37.10 37.01 023 0.37 1 3.07 I05-047 I05-048 37.9 15.0 13 43.27 43.23 011 1.36 1.17 2.28 March 2009 COLU08-002 D-5 City of Colusa Wastewater Collection System Master Plan

Appendix D Hydraulic Model Results Table D-2 City of Colusa (a), (d) Modeled Sewer Line Attributes US MH ID DS MH ID Length Diameter Roughness US Invert DS Invert Full Pipe Capacity Max Flow Max Velocity Slope (ft/ft) (ft) (in) (n) (ft) (ft) (MGD) (MGD) (c) (b), (c) (fps) I05-048 J05-003 324.1 15.0 13 43.23 42.72 016 1.66 1.08 2.18 I05-054 I05-048 371.3 8.0 13 45.29 43.85 039 9-0.17 1.42 I05-055 I05-054 300.2 8.0 13 46.24 45.31 031 3-0.19-0.75 I05-056 I05-040 267.9 8.0 13 43.41 42.63 029 2 0.35 1.82 I05-057 I05-060 266.4 8.0 13 44.38 43.66 027 1 0.31 2.44 I05-060 I05-056 63.9 8.0 13 43.59 43.41 028 1 0.33 1 I05-062 I05-055 176.4 8.0 13 46.91 46.25 037 8-0.19-0.78 I05-062 J05-012 357.5 8.0 13 46.94 45.50 040 0 0.19 0.79 I05-066 I05-043 393.1 8.0 13 37.95 37.10 022 0.36 0 2.25 I05-067 I05-031 60 8.0 13 46.24 44.00 037 8-0.27-1.04 I06-001 H05-027 1004.1 8.0 13 48.25 46.77 015 0.26 2.66 I06-005 I06-001 439.5 8.0 13 49.15 48.27 020 0.35 0.26 1.55 J03-001 J03-002 267.4 18.0 13 45.19 45.05 005 1.55 6 1.39 J03-002 J03-003 989.9 18.0 13 45.05 44.58 005 1.48 6 3.14 J03-003 J03-004 19.6 18.0 13 44.51 43.47 529 15.62 6 2.59 J03-004 J03-005 113.6 18.0 13 43.46 43.15 027 3.55 8 3.68 J03-006 J03-007 50.7 18.0 13 45.08 44.94 028 3.57 1.13 3.39 J03-007 L04-006 2561.3 18.0 13 44.94 38.40 026 3.43 6 3.12 J05-001 I05-057 121.7 6.0 13 44.60 44.57 003 6 0.29 3.11 J05-002 I05-060 129.7 6.0 13 43.96 43.66 023 0.17-0.11-7 J05-003 J05-007 22.7 15.0 13 42.72 42.70 009 1.24 1.08 2.25 J05-004 J05-007 258.8 6.0 13 44.61 43.49 043 0.24-0.24-1.60 J05-004 J05-001 18.1 6.0 13 44.61 44.60 006 9 0.29 2.12 J05-007 J05-020 394.4 15.0 13 42.70 40 018 1.76 0.97 9 J05-012 J05-026 267.1 8.0 13 45.50 44.01 056 8 0.19 0.75 J05-014 I05-066 401.3 8.0 13 38.84 37.98 021 0.36 1 1.92 J05-020 J05-027 104.8 15.0 13 40 41.86 013 1.53 0.95 2.13 J05-026 J05-027 626.0 8.0 13 43.91 42.35 025 0.39-0.25 1.42 J05-027 J05-033 297.1 15.0 13 41.86 41.37 017 1.70 0.97 2.10 J05-028 J05-026 258.1 8.0 13 44.40 44.01 015-3 -1.68 J05-031 J05-014 335.5 8.0 13 39.70 38.91 024 0.38 0.16 1.67 J05-033 J05-043 400.9 15.0 13 41.37 40.79 015 1.59 0.91 2.36 J05-040 J05-028 399.9 8.0 13 45.54 44.54 025 0.39 6 1.41 March 2009 COLU08-002 D-6 City of Colusa Wastewater Collection System Master Plan

Appendix D Hydraulic Model Results (a) Table D-2 City of Colusa (a), (d) Modeled Sewer Line Attributes US MH ID DS MH ID Length Diameter Roughness US Invert DS Invert Full Pipe Capacity Max Flow Max Velocity Slope (ft/ft) (ft) (in) (n) (ft) (ft) (MGD) (MGD) (c) (b), (c) (fps) J05-041 J05-031 291.6 8.0 13 40.36 39.83 018 0.33-0.15 1.32 J05-043 J05-048 61.9 15.0 13 40.70 40.60 016 1.68 0.91 1.86 J05-045 J05-040 297.6 8.0 13 46.09 45.65 015 5 1.22 J05-048 J05-061 309.6 15.0 13 40.60 40.26 011 1.38 0.91 2.90 J05-049 J05-041 301.1 8.0 13 41.03 44 020 0.35-0.15 7 J05-058 J05-062 221.0 8.0 13 43.23 42.73 023 0.37 5 1.19 J05-061 K05-001 196.3 15.0 13 40.11 39.85 013 1.52 9 2.40 J05-062 J05-064 284.7 8.0 13 42.60 46 019 0.34 6 1.54 J05-063 J05-028 139.3 8.0 13 45.34 44.54 057 9-7 -1.93 J05-063 J05-014 196.1 8.0 13 45.39 38.84 334 1.43 5 1.73 J05-064 K05-004 387.4 8.0 13 41.92 40.99 024 0.38 7 1.60 K05-001 K05-003 96.7 15.0 13 39.75 39.63 012 1.47 7 1.98 K05-003 K05-012 46.5 15.0 13 39.63 39.58 011 1.37 6 8 K05-004 K05-012 396.7 8.0 13 40.94 42 023 0.38 9 1.56 K05-005 K05-006 420.9 15.0 13 39.04 38.43 015 1.59 0.76 3 K05-006 K05-007 231.3 15.0 13 38.43 38.09 015 1.60 0.71 3.08 K05-012 K05-005 224.0 15.0 13 39.58 39.20 017 1.72 8 3.05 US = upstream, DS = downstream, MH = manhole, MGD = million gallons per day, fps = feet per second. (b) Max velocity does not necessarly correspond with max flow. The values of max flow and max velocity are the maximum flow and velocities calculated by the dynamic modeling software during the simulation under 10-year, 6-hour design storm conditions. (c) Negative flows and negative velocities shown in particular pipe segments represent backflow due to downstream flow restrictions. (d) Model results of existing level of development at 10-year, 6-hour design storm. March 2009 COLU08-002 D-7 City of Colusa Wastewater Collection System Master Plan

Appendix E Manhole Reference IDs

45 Southwest Region Lurline Ave E04-004 F04-001 F04-005 F04-006 F04-017 F04-024 F04-025 F04-033 F04-034 E05-002 F05-001 F05-002 F05-006 F05-007 F05-003 F05-004 F05-008 F05-011 F05-009 F04-000 F05-012 F05-013 F05-016 F04-051 F05-017 F05-014 G04-008 F05-018 F05-021 F05-019 F04-049 F04-050 F05-022 G04-013 G04-009 F05-025 F05-023 F05-026 F05-024 G04-014 G04-006 F05-028 Wilson Ave F05-027 F05-029 G04-026G04-018 G04-019 G04-011 G04-027 G05-004 G04-030 G04-017 G04-020 G05-005 G04-031 G05-010 G05-018 H04-002 H04-003 G04-028 G05-011 H04-004 G05-019 G05-020 H04-005 H04-011 H04-008 G04-037 G05-014 G05-021 H04-009 G05-028 G05-034 G05-022 H04-014 G05-031 H04-016 G05-033 G06-001 H04-018 G05-041 H05-001 G05-035 G05-030 G05-032 G05-029 H04-015 H05-003 H05-004 H05-006 H04-019 H04-017 H05-011 H05-009 H05-018 H04-021 H05-019 H05-012 H05-020 H05-015 H04-020 H05-021 H05-016 I04-006 H05-029 H05-023 I04-005 H05-030 H05-024 I04-009 I04-001 H05-032 I05-002 H05-031 20 I04-010 I04-003 I04-002 45 H05-033 H05-036 I05-009 H05-034 H05-027 I04-004 I05-010 I05-011 H05-039 H05-037 I04-011 J03-001 I05-018 I05-016 I05-007 I05-006 20 I05-008 I05-013 I05-012 I05-014 I04-013 I05-025 I05-019 I05-017 I05-015 J03-002 I05-022 I05-023 I06-001 I05-024 I05-020 I05-030 I05-038I05-031 I05-037 I05-021 I05-036 I05-032 I06-005 I05-056 I05-033 J03-004 I05-057 I05-054 I05-042 J03-005 J03-003 I05-060 I05-041 J05-004 J05-003 I05-055 J03-006 J05-007 I05-043 I05-062 J03-007 J05-020 J05-012 I05-066 J05-027 J05-063 J05-026 J05-014 J05-033 J05-028 J05-031 J05-043 J05-040 J05-048 J05-041 J05-051 J05-045 K05-001 J05-049 K05-003 J05-064 J05-058 K05-012 J05-062 K05-005 K05-004 10th St Will S. Green Ave 14th St Market St Jay St Oak St Clay St Parkhill St Webster St Lafayette St Fremont St 13th St Colus Ave 12th St 8th St 11th St Harris St 10th St Carson St 9th St So 5th St 8th St 7th St 6th St 5th St H05-022 I05-040 I05-048 Wescott Rd North Region Main St 3rd St 4th St Sioc St 2nd St 1st St I05-047 Bridge St H05-005 H05-035 B St C St State HWY 20 & 45 D St Commer Ave Moonbend Rd K05-006 K05-007 Southeast Region City of Colusa WWTP M:\Colusa\GIS\Map - MXD\CDY\Draft Figures\Appendix E-1 Modeled Manholes - Labeleld ± Modeled Manholes LEGEND Modeled Sewer Lines Existing Force Mains Southeast Region North Region Southwest Region General Plan SOI ECO:LOGIC Engineering City of Colusa Wastewater Collection System Master Plan Miles 0 0.2 Figure E-1 City of Colusa Modeled Manholes - Labeled

E04-004 F04-001 F04-005 F04-006 F04-017 F04-024 Main St F04-033 F04-025 F04-034 F05-001 F05-006 E05-002 F05-002 F05-007 F05-003 F05-004 F05-008 F04-000 F05-011 F05-012 F05-009 F05-013 G04-008 F04-051 Clay St F05-016 F05-017 F05-018 F05-014 G04-009 F04-049 F04-050 F05-021 F05-022 F05-019 13th St G04-013 G04-014 G04-006 F05-025 F05-026 F05-027 F05-023 F05-024 M:\Colusa\GIS\Map - MXD\CDY\Draft Figures\Appendix E-2 Modeled Manholes (Labeled) - North Region G04-030 H04-002 G04-026 H04-003 H04-016 G04-018 G04-031 H04-004 H04-011 G04-027 G04-019 H04-005 H04-014 H04-018 7th St G04-028 G04-037 H04-008 H04-009 Harris St G04-011 G04-017 H04-010 G04-020 G05-018 H05-001 3rd St H05-003 G05-041 G05-004 G05-010 G05-019 G05-028 Bridge St F05-028 G05-034 F05-029 G05-005 G05-011 G05-020 G05-021 G05-014 G05-031 G05-033 G05-032 G05-035 G05-022 G05-030 G05-029 G06-001 ECO:LOGIC Engineering City of Colusa Wastewater Collection System Master Plan Figure E-2 City of Colusa Modeled Manholes - North Region

Will S. Green Ave H04-019 Screens Pump Station H04-021 8th St 10th St I04-010 I04-009 I04-008 I04-006 Colus Ave I04-005 I04-003 J03-001 I04-011 I04-013 J03-002 Primary Pump Station J03-005 J03-003 J03-004 J03-007 J03-006 M:\Colusa\GIS\Map - MXD\CDY\Draft Figures\Appendix E-3 Modeled Manholes (Labeled) - Southwest Region South Wescott Force Main ECO:LOGIC Engineering City of Colusa Wastewater Collection System Master Plan Figure E-3 City of Colusa Modeled Manholes - Southwest Region

B H04-015 H05-004 Wye Pump Station H05-005 H05-006 H04-017 H04-017 H05-018 H05-019 H05-020 H05-011 H05-012 H05-009 H05-016 H05-015 H04-020 H05-021 H05-022 H05-024 H05-023 State HWY 20 & 45 H05-029 H05-030 I04-001 H05-032 I04-002 I05-002 H05-033 H05-034 H05-031 H05-035 H05-036 I04-004 I05-010 I05-009 H05-039 H05-037 H05-028 H05-027 I05-016 I05-011 I05-006 I05-007 I05-008 I05-018 I05-013 I05-012 I05-014 I05-025 Indian Oaks Pump Station I05-019 I05-022 I05-024 I05-023 I05-017 I05-015 I06-001 I05-030 I05-020 I05-038 I05-031 I05-021 I05-037 I06-005 I05-040 I05-047 I05-048 I05-057 I05-056 I05-060 J05-004 J05-002 I05-054 I05-055 I05-032 I05-033 I05-042 I05-041 I05-043 Ross Pump Station J05-007 J05-003 I05-062 I05-066 J05-020 J05-027 J05-012 J05-063 J05-026 J05-014 J05-033 J05-028 J05-031 J05-043 J05-048 Wescott Rd J05-040 J05-045 J05-041 M:\Colusa\GIS\Map - MXD\CDY\Draft Figures\Figure E-4 Modeled Manholes (Labeled) Southeast Region South Wescott Force Main K05-003 K05-012 K05-005 K05-001 K05-006 K05-007 J05-051 K05-004 South Wescott Pump Station J05-064 J05-062 J05-058 J05-049 ECO:LOGIC Engineering City of Colusa Wastewater Collection System Master Plan Figure E-4 City of Colusa Modeled Manholes - Southeast Region

Appendix F Minimum Sewer Line Gradients and Manhole Depths

45 Lurline Ave 12th St 11th St 10th St 9th St 8th St 7th St 6th St 5th St Main St 14th St 13th St Jay St Oak St Clay St Market St 4th St 3rd St 2nd St 1st St B St C St D St Parkhill St Wilson Ave Webster St Lafayette St Fremont St Commer Ave Carson St Harris St Sioc St Bridge St Screens Pump Station 20 10th St [Ú Colus Ave 8th St So 5th St [Ú 45 Wye Pump Station 20 [Ú Primary Pump Station [Ú Will S. Green Ave Indian Oaks Pump Station Wescott Rd [Ú State HWY 20 & 45 Ross Pump Station Moonbend Rd [Ú City of Colusa WWTP South Wescott Pump Station M:\Colusa\GIS\Map - MXD\CDY\Draft Figures/Appendix F-1 Modeled Sewer Lines - Minimum Slope 02-20-09 MLM LEGEND [Ú Modeled Pump Stations Modeled Manholes Sewer Lines with Greater Than Minimum Slope Sewer Lines with Less Than Minimum Slope Existing Force Mains City Limits General Plan SOI ECO:LOGIC Engineering City of Colusa Wastewater Collection System Master Plan ± Minimum Slopes 4" - 084 6" - 049 8" - 035 10" - 025 12" - 020 15" - 015 Miles 0 0.25 1 Figure F-1 City of Colusa Modeled Sewer Lines - Minimum Slope

45 Lurline Ave 12th St 11th St 10th St 9th St 8th St 7th St 6th St 5th St Main St 14th St 13th St Jay St Oak St Clay St Market St 4th St 3rd St 2nd St 1st St B St C St D St Parkhill St Wilson Ave Webster St Lafayette St Fremont St Commer Ave Carson St Harris St Sioc St Bridge St Screens Pump Station 20 10th St [Ú Colus Ave 8th St So 5th St [Ú 45 Wye Pump Station 20 Primary Pump Station [Ú Will S. Green Ave Indian Oaks Pump Station Wescott Rd [Ú [Ú State HWY 20 & 45 Ross Pump Station Moonbend Rd [Ú M:\Colusa\GIS\Map - MXD\CDY\Draft Figures\Appendix F-2 Modeled Sewer Manholes - Minimum Depth 02-20-09 MLM ± Manholed Depth <4 feet LEGEND Manhole Depth 4 to 6 feet Manhole Depth >6 feet Existing Force Mains Modeled Sewer Lines [Ú Modeled Pump Stations City Limits General Plan SOI City of Colusa WWTP NOTE: ECO:LOGIC Engineering City of Colusa Wastewater Collection System Master Plan South Wescott Pump Station MANHOLE DEPTH MEASUREDFROM CROWN OF PIPE TO MANHOLE RIM Miles 0 0.25 1 Figure F-2 City of Colusa Modeled Sewer Manholes - Minimum Depth

Appendix G Future Wastewater Flow Routing Analysis for Goads and Riverbend Developments

45 Lurline Ave 12th St 11th St 10th St 9th St 8th St 7th St 6th St 5th St Main St 14th St 13th St Jay St Oak St Clay St Market St 4th St 3rd St 2nd St 1st St B St C St D St Parkhill St Wilson Ave Webster St Lafayette St Fremont St [Ú Commer Ave Carson St Harris St Sioc St Bridge St Goads and Riverbend Pump Station Screens Pump Station 20 10th St [Ú Colus Ave 8th St So 5th St [Ú 45 Wye Pump Station 20 [Ú Primary Pump Station [Ú Will S. Green Ave Indian Oaks Pump Station Wescott Rd [Ú State HWY 20 & 45 Ross Pump Station Moonbend Rd [Ú M:\Colusa\GIS\Map - MXD\CDY\Draft Figures\Appendix G-1 Goads and Riverbend - 6th Street Route 03-07-09 MLM LEGEND City of Colusa WWTP [Ú Modeled Pump Stations [Ú Upsized Pump Stations [Ú Future Pump Station Modeled Manholes Modeled Sewer Lines Goads and Riverbend Force Main 6th Street Trunk Improvements Goads and Riverbend Route to WWTP Existing Force Mains ECO:LOGIC Engineering City of Colusa Wastewater Collection System Master Plan South Wescott Pump Station ± Existing Development Areas Special Consideration Areas City Limits General Plan SOI Miles 0 0.25 1 Figure G-1 City of Colusa Goads and Riverbend Developments - 6th Street Route

45 Lurline Ave 12th St 11th St 10th St 9th St 8th St 7th St 6th St 5th St Main St 14th St 13th St Jay St Oak St Clay St Market St 4th St 3rd St 2nd St 1st St B St C St D St Parkhill St Wilson Ave Webster St Lafayette St Fremont St [Ú Commer Ave Carson St Harris St Sioc St Bridge St Goads and Riverbend Pump Station Screens Pump Station 20 10th St [Ú Colus Ave 8th St So 5th St [Ú 45 Wye Pump Station 20 [Ú Primary Pump Station [Ú Will S. Green Ave Indian Oaks Pump Station Wescott Rd [Ú State HWY 20 & 45 Ross Pump Station Moonbend Rd [Ú City of Colusa WWTP South Wescott Pump Station M:\Colusa\GIS\Map - MXD\CDY\Draft Figures\Appendix G-2 Goads and Riverbend - Wye Route 03-07-09 MLM LEGEND [Ú Modeled Pump Stations [Ú Upsized Pump Stations [Ú Future Pump Station Modeled Manholes Modeled Sewer Lines Goad and Riverbend Force Main South Wescott Trunk Improvements Route to WWTP Existing Force Mains ECO:LOGIC Engineering City of Colusa Wastewater Collection System Master Plan ± Existing Development Areas Special Consideration Areas City Limits General Plan SOI Miles 0 0.25 1 Figure G-2 City of Colusa Goads and Riverbend Developments - South Wescott Route

Appendix G Future Wastewater Flow Routing Analysis for Goads and Riverbend Developments Component Table G-1 City of Colusa Summary of Future Wastewater Flow Routing Analysis for Goads and Riverbend Developments (a) Current Capacity Existing System (gpm) Existing Development Needed Capacity (in gpm) / Needed Improvements Future Development (Riverbend & Goads via 6 th Street) Future Development (Riverbend & Goads via South Wescott Trunk) Indian Oaks PS 310 Primary PS 600 700 1,390 1,390 Ross PS 300 South Wescott PS 450 900 1,530 2,085 Supply Yard/Screens PS 600 700 1,180 975 Wye PS 393 South Wescott Force Main 900 New force main with 1,530 gpm total New force main with 2,085 gpm total capacity (4,600 ft) capacity South Wescott Trunk Sewer 1,115 Upsize: 1,250 into Wye PS (from N) from 10 to 12 15 from Ross force main to Wescott from 4 to 10 1,450 South Wescott from 12 to 15 4,500 South Wescott from 15 to 18 Other Pipelines Upsize: 4,500 of 6 th St sewer from 8 to 12 Upsize: 3,300 of 6 th St sewer from 8 to 10 1,500 into Wye PS (along Hwy 45/20) from 8 to 10 Summary of Improvements due ONLY to Goads and Riverbend Developments Larger (or new) PS: Screens, Primary Larger (or new) PS: Wye, South Wescott 1,200' ADDITIONAL upsizing of 6 th St Additional ~700 gpm capacity in South Wescott force main sewer ALL 4,500' of 6 th St sewer Upsize 1,250' into Wye PS and 15' from Ross force main improvements upsized to 12" (instead of 10") Upsize 6,000' of South Wescott (to 15" and 18") (a) gpm = gallons per minute, PS = pump station March 2009 COLU08-002 G-1 City of Colusa Wastewater Collection System Master Plan

Appendix H Future Sewer System Collection Areas

45 Lurline Pump Station Colusa Crossings Pump Station New Primary Pump Station Wilson Ave Lurline Ave [Ú 20 [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú 45 Indian Oaks Will S. Green Ave 14th St 13th St Screens Pump Station (To be abandoned) 10th St Colus Ave 12th St 11th St Harris St 8th St 10th St 9th St 8th St 7th St Jay St Oak St Clay St Parkhill St Webster St Lafayette St Fremont St Carson St Sioc St So 5th St Pump Station [Ú [Ú 6th St Wescott Rd 5th St Market St 4th St Main St 3rd St 2nd St [Ú Bridge St 1st St 20 B St [Ú C St State HWY 20 & 45 [Ú D St Wye Pump Station Ross Pump Station Commer Ave Moonbend Rd Goads and Riverbend Pump Station Moonbend Pump Station City of Colusa WWTP New South Wescott Pump Station M:\Colusa\GIS\Map - MXD\CDY\Draft Figures\Appendix H-1 Future Sewer System Collection Areas LEGEND Tributary to Lurline Pump Station Tributary to Colusa Crossings Pump Station Tributary to Goads and Riverbend Pump Station Tributary to Screens Pump Station Tributary to Primary Pump Station Tributary to Wye Pump Station Tributary to Indian Oaks Pump Station Tributary to Ross Pump Station Tributary to Moonbend Pump Station Tributary to South Wescott Pump Station ECO:LOGIC Engineering City of Colusa Wastewater Collection System Master Plan [Ú Existing Pump Stations [Ú Future Pump Stations Goads and Riverbend Force Main Existing Manholes Existing Sewer Lines Build-out Trunk Sewers City Limits General Plan SOI ± NOTE: ROSS, INDIAN OAKS AND WYE PUMP STATIONS DISCHARGE TO SOUTH WESCOTT TRUNK. Miles 0 0.25 1 Figure H-1 City of Colusa Future Sewer System Collection Areas

Appendix I New Gravity Sewer Information

Appendix I New Gravity Sewer Information City of Colusa Sizing Assumptions for New Gravity Sewer The proposed new gravity sewer infrastructure to serve unsewered portions of the City of Colusa's SOI at build-out was sized and routed based on the following assumptions: 1. The alignment of these new sewer lines follow future collector roads as identified in the General Plan s Circulation Diagram. 2. The minimum slope for each proposed diameter of new sewer is based on the City Design Standards. 3. The minimum pipe cover for trunk lines and minimum manhole depth is based on values established in the City Design Standards. 4. The minimum proposed diameter is 10-inches. Some smaller diameter trunk pipelines are shown (Figure 7-5) for clarity. However, it is assumed that the cost of these sewer pipes will be the responsibility of the developer. 5. Proposed new sewer pipelines were sized assuming 70% full as described in the City Design Standards. A peaking factor of 3.1 (as described in Section 4.2.2) was applied to dry weather flows from Future Developments Phase II. 6. The roughness value, Manning's n, of 13 was used in sizing all new trunks. March 2009 COLU08-002 I-1 City of Colusa Wastewater Collection System Master Plan

Appendix I New Gravity Sewer Information Table I-1 City of Colusa New Gravity Sewer Approximate Characteristics Gravity Trunk Ground Elevation (estimated) (ft) Top of Pipe Elevation (ft) (a) Pipe Starting Invert (ft) End invert (ft) Length of Trunk Sewer (ft) Size of Pipeline (in) Pipe slope Colusa Crossing Trunk North SOI to Lurline Ave 56.5 5 49.8 34.6 4,350 8 035 Lurline Ave to Colusa Crossing PS 56.0 5 49.3 39.7 2,750 8 035 39.7 37.2 1,000 10 025 37.2 35.1 1,050 12 020 Colusa Crossing PS to New Primary PS 5 44.0 42.8 4 1,550 15 015 4 38.0 2,000 18 012 MoonBend Trunk Commer Ave to Moonbend PS 55.0 49.0 48.0 4 3,050 12 020 4 37.6 2,950 15 015 Moonbend PS to New South Wescott PS 5 46.0 44.8 30.9 9,250 15 015 (a) Assumes 6 feet of ground cover, per City of Colusa design standards March 2009 COLU08-002 I-2 City of Colusa Wastewater Collection System Master Plan

Appendix I New Gravity Sewer Information Pump Station Table I-2 City of Colusa New Pump Station Approximate Ground and Floor Elevations Ground Elevation (estimated) (ft) Pump Station Wet Well Floor Elevation (ft) Lurline Pump Station 56.5 34.5 Colusa Crossing Pump Station 5 35.0 New Primary Pump Station 52.5 37.5 Moonbend Pump Station 5 37.0 New Wescott Pump Station 5 3 March 2009 COLU08-002 I-3 City of Colusa Wastewater Collection System Master Plan

Appendix J Pump Station Cost Estimates

Appendix J Pump Station Cost Estimates Table J-1 Pump Station Cost Estimates March 2009 City of Colusa COLU08-002 J-1 Wastewater Collection System Master Plan