Femto second X ray Pulse Generation by Electron Beam Slicing. F. Willeke, L.H. Yu, NSLSII, BNL, Upton, NY 11973, USA

Similar documents
FACET-II Design Update

FURTHER UNDERSTANDING THE LCLS INJECTOR EMITTANCE*

Longitudinal Measurements at the SLAC Gun Test Facility*

Potential use of erhic s ERL for FELs and light sources ERL: Main-stream GeV e - Up-gradable to 20 + GeV e -

Low slice emittance preservation during bunch compression

PAL LINAC UPGRADE FOR A 1-3 Å XFEL

LCLS Injector Prototyping at the GTF

Accelerator Physics Issues of ERL Prototype

Femto-second FEL Generation with Very Low Charge at LCLS

LCLS-II SCRF start-to-end simulations and global optimization as of September Abstract

Parameter selection and longitudinal phase space simulation for a single stage X-band FEL driver at 250 MeV

Use of Crab Cavities for Short X-ray Pulse Production in Rings

Linac optimisation for the New Light Source

SRF GUN CHARACTERIZATION - PHASE SPACE AND DARK CURRENT MEASUREMENTS AT ELBE*

Linac Driven Free Electron Lasers (III)

LCLS Accelerator Parameters and Tolerances for Low Charge Operations

Simulations for photoinjectors C.Limborg

FACET-II Design, Parameters and Capabilities

Diagnostic Systems for Characterizing Electron Sources at the Photo Injector Test Facility at DESY, Zeuthen site

CSR Benchmark Test-Case Results

S2E (Start-to-End) Simulations for PAL-FEL. Eun-San Kim

X-band RF driven hard X-ray FELs. Yipeng Sun ICFA Workshop on Future Light Sources March 5-9, 2012

LOLA: Past, present and future operation

Laser Heater: Scaling of Laser Power with Undulator Period and Laser Wavelength

Tolerances for magnetic fields in the Gun-To-Linac region of the LCLS Injector *

VELA/CLARA as Advanced Accelerator Studies Test-bed at Daresbury Lab.

LCLS Injector Straight Ahead Spectrometer C.Limborg-Deprey Stanford Linear Accelerator Center 8 th June 2005

Alignment requirement for the SRF cavities of the LCLS-II injector LCLSII-TN /16/2014

Towards a Low Emittance X-ray FEL at PSI

ERL FOR LOW ENERGY ELECTRON COOLING AT RHIC (LEREC)*

ASTRA simulations of the slice longitudinal momentum spread along the beamline for PITZ

Dark Current at Injector. Jang-Hui Han 27 November 2006 XFEL Beam Dynamics Meeting

Injector Experimental Progress

Beam Shaping and Permanent Magnet Quadrupole Focusing with Applications to the Plasma Wakefield Accelerator

Longitudinal Top-up Injection for Small Aperture Storage Rings

ATTOSECOND X-RAY PULSES IN THE LCLS USING THE SLOTTED FOIL METHOD

Two-Stage Chirped-Beam SASE-FEL for High Power Femtosecond X-Ray Pulse Generation

First propositions of a lattice for the future upgrade of SOLEIL. A. Nadji On behalf of the Accelerators and Engineering Division

BERLinPro. An ERL Demonstration facility at the HELMHOLTZ ZENTRUM BERLIN

R&D experiments at BNL to address the associated issues in the Cascading HGHG scheme

Short Pulse, Low charge Operation of the LCLS. Josef Frisch for the LCLS Commissioning Team

Ultra-Short Low Charge Operation at FLASH and the European XFEL

New Electron Source for Energy Recovery Linacs

Linac Based Photon Sources: XFELS. Coherence Properties. J. B. Hastings. Stanford Linear Accelerator Center

Generation and characterization of ultra-short electron and x-ray x pulses

OPTIMIZATION OF COMPENSATION CHICANES IN THE LCLS-II BEAM DELIVERY SYSTEM

(M. Bowler, C. Gerth, F. Hannon, H. Owen, B. Shepherd, S. Smith, N. Thompson, E. Wooldridge, N. Wyles)

Lattice Design and Performance for PEP-X Light Source

SPPS: The SLAC Linac Bunch Compressor and Its Relevance to LCLS

ThomX Machine Advisory Committee. (LAL Orsay, March ) Ring Beam Dynamics

Beam Dynamics. Gennady Stupakov. DOE High Energy Physics Review June 2-4, 2004

Lattice Design of 2-loop Compact ERL. High Energy Accelerator Research Organization, KEK Miho Shimada and Yukinori Kobayashi

Linear Collider Collaboration Tech Notes

Simulations of the IR/THz Options at PITZ (High-gain FEL and CTR)

Compensation of CSR in bunch compressor for FACET-II. Yichao Jing, BNL Vladimir N. Litvinenko, SBU/BNL 10/17/2017 Facet II workshop, SLAC

6 Bunch Compressor and Transfer to Main Linac

Part V Undulators for Free Electron Lasers

RF-Gun Experience at PITZ - Longitudinal Phase Space

Microbunching Workshop 2010 March 24, 2010, Frascati, Italy. Zhirong Huang

Introduction. Thermoionic gun vs RF photo gun Magnetic compression vs Velocity bunching. Probe beam design options

Vertical Polarization Option for LCLS-II. Abstract

Optics considerations for

ILC Spin Rotator. Super B Workshop III. Presenter: Jeffrey Smith, Cornell University. with

SLS at the Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), Villigen, Switzerland

Expected properties of the radiation from VUV-FEL / femtosecond mode of operation / E.L. Saldin, E.A. Schneidmiller, M.V. Yurkov

Fast Simulation of FEL Linacs with Collective Effects. M. Dohlus FLS 2018

Using IMPACT T to perform an optimization of a DC gun system Including merger

4GLS Status. Susan L Smith ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory

X-band Photoinjector Beam Dynamics

ILC Beam Dynamics Studies Using PLACET

Velocity Bunching Studies at FLASH. Bolko Beutner, DESY XFEL Beam Dynamics Meeting

Comparison of the APS Upgrade to

Echo-Enabled Harmonic Generation

VARIABLE GAP UNDULATOR FOR KEV FREE ELECTRON LASER AT LINAC COHERENT LIGHT SOURCE

Femtosecond and sub-femtosecond x-ray pulses from a SASE-based free-electron laser. Abstract

OPTIMIZING RF LINACS AS DRIVERS FOR INVERSE COMPTON SOURCES: THE ELI-NP CASE

Diagnostic Systems for High Brightness Electron Injectors

Characterization of an 800 nm SASE FEL at Saturation

3. Synchrotrons. Synchrotron Basics

II) Experimental Design

Simple limits on achieving a quasi-linear magnetic compression for an FEL driver

Coherent synchrotron radiation in magnetic bunch compressors. Qiang Gao, ZhaoHeng Guo, Alysson Vrielink

Free-electron laser SACLA and its basic. Yuji Otake, on behalf of the members of XFEL R&D division RIKEN SPring-8 Center

Machine design and electron beam control of a single-pass linac for free electron laser Di Mitri, Simone

SABER Optics. Y. Nosochkov, K. Bane, P. Emma, R. Erickson. SABER Workshop, SLAC, March 15-16, /25

Low energy electron storage ring with tunable compaction factor

Excitements and Challenges for Future Light Sources Based on X-Ray FELs

The New Superconducting RF Photoinjector a High-Average Current & High-Brightness Gun

ELIC Design. Center for Advanced Studies of Accelerators. Jefferson Lab. Second Electron-Ion Collider Workshop Jefferson Lab March 15-17, 2004

Beam Echo Effect for Generation of Short Wavelength Radiation

Beam Dynamics and SASE Simulations for XFEL. Igor Zagorodnov DESY

Inverse Compton Scattering Sources from Soft X-rays to γ-rays

CONCEPTUAL STUDY OF A SELF-SEEDING SCHEME AT FLASH2

arxiv: v1 [physics.acc-ph] 21 Oct 2014

Time resolved transverse and longitudinal phase space measurements at the high brightness photo injector PITZ

Emittance and photocathodes

Status of Proof-of-Principle Experiment of Coherent Electron Cooling at BNL

Issues of Electron Cooling

$)ODW%HDP(OHFWURQ6RXUFHIRU/LQHDU&ROOLGHUV

Multiparameter optimization of an ERL. injector

Transcription:

Femto second X ray Pulse Generation by Electron Beam Slicing F. Willeke, L.H. Yu, NSLSII, BNL, Upton, NY 11973, USA

r 2 r 1 y d x z v Basic Idea: When short electron bunch from linac (5MeV, 50pC,100fs) passes above a storage ring bunch (30 ps), it kicks a slice (150fs) vertically. (Ferdinand Willeke) The radiation from short slice is separated from the core bunch. Advantages when compared to other schemes respectively may be a complimentary approach Need much smaller space in storage ring for interaction point, compared with crab cavity Pulse length (150fs) much shorter than crab cavity method (1 2ps) The flux per pulse may be increased significantly compared with laser slicing (> x 6 10) Rep rate can be higher than laser slicing ( 100kHz 1 MHz compared with 1 10kHz) 10 3 ~10 4 of magnitude higher rep. rate, more stable than LCLS for short x ray pulse

Estimate of Basic Parameters of the Slicing Beam Require: * high rep. rate, * low energy to lower cost * small focused beam size, * short bunch length Energy 5 MeV, 50pC, 100fs bunch e n = 5mm, β=2.5mm,f=25cm, Deflection q=3.3 mrad Core separation 5 s require q =3 mrad with b y =25m Length of deflected part ~2 150fs Beam size determine slice length Storage ring bunch FWHM length of deflected part 300 fs RMS linac beam size 35 µm 50 µm

How to generate chirp for low energy compressor Photo cathode gun output has small chirp at low charge Space charge generate negative chirp head has higher energy than tail Focus the beam to use space charge to increase the chirp 1. low charge -> very small chirp 2.100pC, small negative chirp 3. Focusing required chirp ~1%/ps

Chicane for negative chirped bunch For ordinary chicane, tail has higher energy, go through shorter path length to catch up with head negative R56 (path length change per unit energy increase) For our case, head has higher energy due to space charge, needs longer path Use quads to flip the trajectory after bend to increase path length for electrons with higher energy positive R56 Low energy trajectory Center energy trajectory High energy trajectory E / E t s Ordinary chicane with negative R56 E / E t s Special chicane with positive R56

Chicane for negative chirped bunch Small chirp large R56 large beta function large beam size particles with large transverse oscillation lag behind long bunch length need smaller R56 we need larger chirp strong focusing before entrance to the chicane (against intuition, we use space charge instead of avoid it) Found we need 1% chirp in 1 ps and R56=15mm Realized we need to overcome R56 of drift space, 10mm/m. For 5 meter beamline we need additional 50mm of R56 R56=65mm beta function is controlled <10m 0.2 Dispersion is reduced to 12cm 100fs at focal point satisfactory when space charge is neglected 12 Focusing before entrance to chicane increased the chirp to 1%/ps Dispersion[m] Betax, Betay [m] -0.2-12 Use ELEGANT to design linear lattice as first step (without space charge effect) To reach R56=65mm. Lattice is as close as possible to maintain symmetry. This help control beta maximum. Move these quads close to bends to limit betax while reaching desired dispersion Bending increased to 20 degree from initial design of 10

Space charge effect Turn on space charge, simulated by the code PARMELA, 3 D blow up: Beam size increased from 30µ 500µ Bunch length increased from 100fs 1ps Particle energy is no longer constant Dispersion and beta function lost meaning Found a way to represent these functions Averaged trajectories within selected initial energy ranges give equivalent dispersion Averaged trajectories within selected initial emittance ranges give equivalent beta function Adjust the quads to return the dispersion function and beta function to be approximately same as the case without space charge. Gradually turn on the space charge from 1 pc to 10 pc and start to use optimization procedure in python to optimize these functions

Functions defined to represent beam size and dispersion when space charge dominated x,y RMs beam size & dispersion with space charge Magnets are adjusted to return to similar shape as linear case while charge is gradually turned on Linear lattice functions (i.e., without space charge)

To overcome drift space s negative R56, we need over compress in the middle of the compressor After the middle of the chicane the head becomes the tail, the energy spread starts to decrease Lattice is almost symmetric Low energy trajectory Center energy trajectory High energy trajectory at the focal point, due to Liouville's theorem, longitudinal phase space is conserved increased energy spread can lead to smaller bunch length Strong focusing at the entrance to chicane can increase energy spread Increase solenoid strength in RF gun for strong focusing shorter bunch length space charge effect can be used to compensate its damages

Energy spread increase due to space charge effect is reversible Energy spread change caused by space charge was not as harmful as initially expected When energy spread increased, the required quad strength and dipole strength to bend the trajectory for high energy particles are reduced so it returns to the same trajectory as if there is no space charge Energy spread increase in this case is not an irreversible process Strong focusing Increases energy spread Increase final energy spread so bunch length is shorter RF-gun Final focal point

Parameters for the Slicing Beam Based on performance of bunch compressor at 5 MeV Slice pulse length ~2 185fs FWHM Energy 5 MeV, 50pC, 166fs bunch Beam size determine slice length Angular separation 5 s q Core s q =0.6 mrad with b y =25m Deflection q=3.3 mrad Radiator at b y =1m, deflect q =16 mrad Storage ring bunch Single pulse photon flux S=10 15 photons/sec/0.1%bw, U20, 8keV Slice 0.3ps out of 30ps bunch=1% fraction revolution time 2.6µs, 1000 bunches, 500mA 10 15 0.3ps/30ps 2.6µs/1000= 2.6 10 4 2.6 10 4 photons/0.1%bw bunch current 0.5mA 16 10 4 photons/0.1%bw 3mA camshaft RMS linac beam size 31 µm FWHM length of deflected part 370 fs 28 µm 40 µm Flux 2.6 10 9 photons/sec/0.1%bw with rep. rate 100kHz vertical emittance increase 8% (to be discussed later)

Performance of Compressor vs. Energy, Charge Increase linac energy to increase charge and reduce bunch length case Charge[pC] Energy[MeV] Bunch length[fs] Rms beamsize x[um] 1 50 5 166 31 28 2 100 12 110 34 31 3 150 12 122 32 22 Rms beamsize y[um]

A specific example of storage ring beam slice profile Use 12MeV beam with 150 pc, at d=31µm from high energy beam center Showing 37µm positional and 22 µrad angular separation at radiator slice slice core Phase space at kick point core Dy=37µ core 5s cut slice After 125± phase advance at radiator Kick point Df=0± Radiator Df=125± s y-slice / s y-core =11µ/3.2µ Fraction of slice=1.7% e y-slice / e y-core =34pm/9.5pm Dy/s y-core =37µ/3.2µ

Crossing angle of slicing and Slice pulse length Result: 90± s t =270fs s y-slice / s y-core =11µ/3.2µ Fraction of slice=1.7% e y-slice / e y-core =34pm/9.5pm Dy/s y-core =37µ/3.2µ 45± s t =150fs s y-slice / s y-core =6.9µ/3.2µ Fraction of slice=0.9% e y-slice / e y-core =19pm/9.5pm Dy/s y-core =29µ/3.2µ X (horizontal) Slice is shorter Sliced electrons 90± crossing 45± crossing z Low energy electron High energy electron

Rep. rate limitation due to vertical emittance increase One angular kick of 5 s q with a slice of 300 fs in a 30 ps bunch increases e y by. 52 e y = 12% e y with rep. rate f for one bunch, increase rate is f 12%, Emittance increase is f 12% t, t =damping time =10ms If f=100hz, get 12% increase For 1000 bunches with evenly distributed kicks, 12% tolerance on e y increase, rep. rate limit is 100kHz. APS experiences show tolerance on e y may be much larger. Two linacs bunces to form a local bump for the kicked electrons in storage ring Can reduce emittance increase with increased rep. rate. Challenge to be studied Storage ring bunch Radiator 2 nd linac bunch 1 st linac bunch 180 ± phase advance

Summary: It is possible to achieve the following: Small space used in storage ring High fraction: slice is 1% of core Use low energy beam 5 12MeV High rep rate 100kH 1MHz Pulse length 150fs

End