YUBA COUNTY WATER AGENCY

Similar documents
Appendix G. Meso-Habitat Surveys. DRAFT Annual Technical Report

Squaw Creek. General Information

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF STREAM CONDITIONS AND HABITAT TYPES IN REACH 4, REACH 5 AND REACH 6.

Big Wood River. General Information

Topographic Maps. More than a Road Map

CR AAO Bridge. Dead River Flood & Natural Channel Design. Mitch Koetje Water Resources Division UP District

EAGLES NEST AND PIASA ISLANDS

ODFW AQUATIC INVENTORY PROJECT OREGON PLAN FOR SALMON & WATERSHEDS STREAM RESTORATION HABITAT REPORT

Channel responses to the removal of Gold Ray and Savage Rapids Dam. Prepared by Desirée Tullos and Cara Water

Elevation (ft) Slope ( ) County CONDITION CATEGORY. Parameter Natural Condition Slightly impacted Moderately Impacted Heavily Impacted

17-20 November 2007 Incidental Take Monitoring Methodology and Results

Vermont Stream Geomorphic Assessment. Appendix J. Vermont Regional Hydraulic Geometry Curves

Estimating Stream Gradient Using NHD Stream Lines and DEM Data

Highland Lake Bathymetric Survey

Table E1. Site details for reaches selected for PHABSIM surveys in 2007

State of the River: Geomorphic Structure. Josh Wyrick, Ph.D. UC Davis

A SIMPLE GIS METHOD FOR OBTAINING FLOODED AREAS

Field Observations and One-Dimensional Flow Modeling of Summit Creek in Mack Park, Smithfield, Utah

Bank Erosion and Morphology of the Kaskaskia River

Use of benthic invertebrate biological indicators in evaluating sediment deposition impairment on the Middle Truckee River, California

ODFW AQUATIC INVENTORY PROJECT OREGON PLAN FOR SALMON & WATERSHEDS STREAM RESTORATION HABITAT REPORT

Stop 1: Marmot Dam Stop 1: Marmot Dam

ODFW AQUATIC INVENTORY PROJECT STREAM REPORT

Gravel Transport Study Report for Energy Northwest's Packwood Lake Hydroelectric Project FERC No Lewis County, Washington

ODFW AQUATIC INVENTORY PROJECT RESTORATION MONITORING STREAM HABITAT REPORT. Peggy Kavanagh, Trevan Cornwell TOLEDO SOUTH Coast Range Lora Tennant

TSEGI WASH 50% DESIGN REPORT

Chapter 6 Mapping and Online Tools

ODFW AQUATIC INVENTORY PROJECT STREAM REPORT

ADDRESSING GEOMORPHIC AND HYDRAULIC CONTROLS IN OFF-CHANNEL HABITAT DESIGN

Hannah Moore CEE Juvenile Bull Trout Distribution in the South Fork Walla Walla River, Oregon

Geomorphology Studies

APPENDIX A M&T/Llano Seco Long-Term Water Reliability Study These photos are examples of rock spurs in use throughout the United States

Draft exercise for share fair at Bozeman workshop only. This exercise is not ready for distribution. Please send helpful suggestions to

Conceptual Model of Stream Flow Processes for the Russian River Watershed. Chris Farrar

Upper Mississippi River Basin Environmental Management Program Workshop

LOMR SUBMITTAL LOWER NEHALEM RIVER TILLAMOOK COUNTY, OREGON

Appendix A Total Dissolved Gas. Fixed Monitoring Stations

SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT UPPER AMERICAN RIVER PROJECT (FERC Project No. 2101) and

Diagnostic Geomorphic Methods for Understanding Future Behavior of Lake Superior Streams What Have We Learned in Two Decades?

Development of Riparian Maps for Sonoma County Long Term Riparian Corridor Conservation. Mark Tukman & Dylan Loudon Tukman Geospatial

Start of Presentation: No notes (Introductory Slide 1) 1) Salmonid Habitat Intrinsic Potential (IP) models are a type of habitat potential

Step 5: Channel Bed and Planform Changes

What Do You See? FOR 274: Forest Measurements and Inventory. Area Determination: Frequency and Cover

Habitat Monitoring Update Hudson River CAG November 16, 2017

Create A Watershed Profile

Section B - Chapter 13 Neuse River Subbasin Bay River and Pamlico Sound

Puakea, Hawaiÿi. Puakea, Hawaiÿi WATERSHED FEATURES

Coarse Sediment Augmentation on Regulated Rivers. Scott McBain McBain & Trush, Inc.

Welcome to NetMap Portal Tutorial

Dams, sediment, and channel changes and why you should care

Why Geomorphology for Fish Passage

May 7, Roger Leventhal, P.E. Marin County Public Works Laurel Collins Watershed Sciences

Restoration Goals TFG Meeting. Agenda

FUTURE MEANDER BEND MIGRATION AND FLOODPLAIN DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS NEAR RIVER MILES 200 TO 191 OF THE SACRAMENTO RIVER

INDOT Office of Traffic Safety

APPENDIX E. GEOMORPHOLOGICAL MONTORING REPORT Prepared by Steve Vrooman, Keystone Restoration Ecology September 2013

Keanahalululu Gulch, Hawaiÿi

Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project (FERC No ) Geomorphology Study Study Plan Section Study Implementation Report.

Fluvial Erosion Impacts on Infrastructure Along Indiana Rivers and Streams

List of Sites in District 2C Source Number


Wetlands and Riparian Mapping Framework Technical Meeting

LOMR SUBMITTAL LOWER NESTUCCA RIVER TILLAMOOK COUNTY, OREGON

Sixteen Mile Creek Tributaries Meander Belt Width Assessment November 2009

Session C1 - Applying the Stream Functions Pyramid to Geomorphic Assessments and Restoration Design

CAUSES FOR CHANGE IN STREAM-CHANNEL MORPHOLOGY

Kootenai River Habitat Restoration Program Update

Implementing a Project with 319 Funds: The Spring Brook Meander Project. Leslie A. Berns

Bishopville Prong Study

REACH 1 T37S-R14W-S07NW

Case Study 8. North Fork Nooksack River In-channel Project

GIS in Water Resources Midterm Quiz Fall There are 5 questions on this exam. Please do all 5. They are of equal credit.

Oregon Dept. of Fish & Wildlife Aquatic Inventories Project State of Oregon Fish Sampling Coverage Metadata Date: August, 2002

Evaluation of Geomorphic Effects of Removal of Marmot and Little Sandy Dams and Potential Impacts on Anadromous Salmonids

FUTURE MEANDER BEND MIGRATION AND FLOODPLAIN DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS NEAR RIVER MILES 200 TO 191 OF THE SACRAMENTO RIVER PHASE III REPORT

Tom Ballestero University of New Hampshire. 1 May 2013

Exercise 2: Working with Vector Data in ArcGIS 9.3

Degradation Concerns related to Bridge Structures in Alberta

Assessment of the Hood River Delta Hood River, Oregon

Lower South Fork McKenzie River Floodplain Enhancement Project

Restoring the Napa River:

Summary Description Municipality of Anchorage. Anchorage Coastal Resource Atlas Project

Stream Geomorphology. Leslie A. Morrissey UVM July 25, 2012

Mobrand to Jones and Stokes. Sustainable Fisheries Management Use of EDT

1.0 Appendix. Appendix A In-stream LWD Data Collection Sheet In Stream LWD Data Collection Stream Site: Coordinates:x y Crew: Date: Dia-4.

MVP WMS, George Schorr

April 12, Prepared by: ECORP Consulting, Inc Warren Drive Rocklin, California 95677

Louisiana Transportation Engineering Conference. Monday, February 12, 2007

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

UPPER COSUMNES RIVER FLOOD MAPPING

Gold Ray Dam Removal Monitoring: OSU Summary. Prepared by Desiree Tullos and Cara Walter

PROPOSAL TO MAP THE LOWER YUBA RIVER CORRIDOR IN HIGH RESOLUTION TO SUPPORT RIPARIAN AND CHANNEL RESTORATION. Professor Greg Pasternack, UC Davis

Notes and Summary pages:

9. PROBABLE MAXIMUM PRECIPITATION AND PROBABLE MAXIMUM FLOOD

FINAL AESTHETICS RESOURCES STUDY PLAN. Takatz Lake Hydroelectric Project, FERC No Prepared by: City and Borough of Sitka Electric Department

Gully Erosion Part 1 GULLY EROSION AND ITS CAUSES. Introduction. The mechanics of gully erosion

Chapter 3 - White Oak River Subbasin Includes Bogue Sound and the Newport River

LANDFORMS OF THE LOWER YUBA RIVER

Stream Simulation: A Simple Example

Guide to Hydrologic Information on the Web

Transcription:

YUBA COUNTY WATER AGENCY Representative Site Selection Above Englebright Reservoir Stream Fish, Aquatic BMI, Aquatic Mollusks Yuba County Water Agency Yuba River Development Project FERC Project No. 2246

Purpose and Goal The following document provides locations for representative field sampling activities. This document is a planning level assessment of general locations where sampling is required. All GPS locations, imagery, elevation and other data are to generally characterize the area. As a result, actual site locations may be adjusted to accommodate field sampling logistics, or to move sample areas to habitat that better represents the stream reach. Locations will be refined during collaboration and finalization. The goal of this assessment will be define locations for Stream Fish Populations Above Englebright Reservoir and BMI sampling Above of Englebright Reservoir and to overlap or co-locate sites where possible. In addition, single site locations for aquatic mollusk sampling on Forest Service land will also be defined. Selection Criteria Where possible and appropriate, sites will: 1) include habitat representative of the overall reach; 2) be located with any known historic sampling sites; 3) be co-located with sampling sites for other aquatic studies (Instream Flow, Fish, BMI, Aquatic Mollusks); 4) be selected using mesohabitat mapping information available when the sites are selected to help identify sampling sites with mesohabitat types in similar proportion to the larger geomorphic reaches of the river; 5) be chosen far enough upstream or downstream of access locations to minimize the effects of recreational activity, but still be reasonably accessible to field crews; and 6) where comparisons likely are to be made between sampling locations, comparison study sites will be located in sections of river with similar habitat types and similar sampling methods will be used. Site selection confirmation will involve identifying the upstream and downstream markers for each site. Sample sites may vary in length, and will range at a minimum, between 100 and 300 meters (m). The exact length will be based on sufficiently representing habitat. For each Fish Population site, the field participants will also highlight if snorkeling will be required to sample a site, as that is the secondary sampling method if electrofishing is not feasible. Data Reviewed Several tools and information sources were utilized to select site locations. USGS quads, aerial video, GIS datasets, field habitat mapping data, photos, and relicensing participant comments were reviewed. Site selection was based upon representing overall habitat within the stream channel, by elevation, spatial distribution, sampling feasibility and safety. Below is a description of how best to utilize the enclosed information. 1

FERC Required Site Locations (obtained from Finalized Study Plans) Stream Fish Populations Above Englebright Reservoir Stream North Yuba River Oregon Creek Middle Yuba River Yuba River River Reaches New Bullard s Bar Dam Reach Upstream of Log Cabin Diversion Dam Reach Non-Project Log Cabin Diversion Dam Reach Upstream of Our House Diversion Dam Reach Non-Project Our House Diversion Dam Reach Reach Length (mi) 2.3 Not Applicable General Location Site located below but in the vicinity of the USGS gaging station downstream of New Bullard s Bar Dam. Site will be determined based on reasonable access and appropriate sampling area (e.g., avoid large substrate and interstitial flowing water common for this section of the river). Site located near the confluence of the North Yuba River with the Middle Yuba River. Site located proximally to Log Cabin Diversion Dam, if possible within 0.5 mile. 4.1 Site located near the confluence of Oregon Creek with the Middle Yuba River. n/a Site located within 0.5 mile upstream of Our House Diversion Dam Reach. 7.5 Site located within 0.5 mile downstream of Our House Diversion Dam. Site located upstream of the Highway 49 Bridge Crossing near RM 4.5. Oregon Creek Reach 4.5 Site located proximally to Moonshine Creek near RM 3.4. Middle/North Yuba River Reach New Colgate Powerhouse Reach Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Above Englebright Reservoir Stream Reach General Location North Yuba River Oregon Creek Middle Yuba River 5.8 1.7 New Bullard s Bar Dam Reach Log Cabin Diversion Dam Reach Our House Diversion Dam Reach Oregon Creek Reach Yuba River Middle/North Yuba (assuming a suitable site can be River Reach found and sampling can be New Colgate performed safely) Powerhouse Reach *Recently added by FERC on September 30, 2011 Site located near the confluence of the Middle Yuba River in an accessible location. Access within the reach is limited. Site located proximally upstream of the New Colgate Powerhouse (RM 34) where access is available. Site may be quantitatively snorkeled due to the larger stream channel. Site located upstream of the influence of the reservoir, but downstream of the influence of the powerhouse. Sites will likely be quantitatively snorkeled due to the larger stream channel. Limited access may be available at Rice Crossing or from access roads of the powerhouse. Within 0.5 mile downstream of New Bullards Bar Dam Immediately upstream of confluence with North Yuba River Within 0.5 mile downstream of Log Cabin Diversion Dam Immediately upstream of confluence with Middle Yuba River Within 0.5 mile downstream of Our House Diversion Dam Immediately upstream of Oregon Creek* Immediately downstream of the confluence with Oregon Creek Immediately upstream of confluence with North Yuba River Within 0.5 mile upstream of New Colgate powerhouse* Within 0.5 mile downstream of New Colgate Powerhouse Aquatic Mollusks Licensee will select a single sampling location for FSS mollusks on each river reach identified in the Stream Fish Populations Study on which NFS land occurs. Specialstatus mollusk sampling sites will be co-located with Stream Fish Population Study sites, and if a reach includes more than one stream fish sampling site on NFS land, Licensee will randomly select one of the sites in the reach for special-status mollusk sampling. In addition, Licensee will select three sites on NFS land for special-status mollusk sampling along the shoreline of New Bullards Bar Reservoir (not included in this site package). Notably NFS Land is not present in North or main Yuba rivers. 2

How to Use This Data Two pieces of data are coordinated with tools the relicensing participants have on hand, aerial maps and aerial video. The proposed locations have lat and long measurements that can be pasted into mapping services such as Google Maps (http://maps.google.com) or Acme Mapper (http://mapper.acme.com/) in the following format (39 22 54.57, -121 08 17.82 ). (Note that the GPS units are not the exact same format as displayed in the aerial video, so an additional explanation for the aerial video GPS is included in the next paragraph). Always separate the latitude and longitude with a comma and space and include a negative sign or dash prior to the longitude. There is also an embedded GPS unit in the video. In the video capture below, the GPS units are displayed as 3923N2401 and 12105W7933. To enter this into a mapping service (i.e. Google Maps) you would translate it into 39 23.2401, -121 05.7933. The N and the W turn into decimals and spaces are inserted. Finally, the time counter on the aerial video is displayed for each area, so that you can quickly navigate to the proposed location and view habitat within the area. Only reference the counter on the screen shown below, the counter in your program interface may be different. Included Data Example Information: Lat: 39 23 14.41 Long: 121 05 47.50 Video: 01:50:28 Timer Location Video GPS Location 3

North Yuba River New Bullard s Bar Dam Reach Project(s): Fish, BMI No Forest Service Land--No Aquatic Mollusk Sampling Site: 1 of 2 (Upper Site) Rivermile: Approx. 1.5 Elevation: 1,250 ft. Lat: 39 22 54.57 Long: 121 08 17.82 Video: 00:40:11 4

North Yuba River New Bullard s Bar Dam Reach Project(s): Fish, BMI No Forest Service Land--No Aquatic Mollusk Sampling Site 2 of 2 (Lower Site) Rivermile: Approx. 0.25 Elevation: 1,190 ft. Lat: 39 22 13.06 Long: 121 08 21.16 Video: 00:39:00 5

North Yuba, New Bullards Bar Dam Reach Habitat Summary Chart Upper Site Falls 1 New Bullards Bar Dam 1,350 Cascades Chutes 2 3 Average Gradient: 2.0% Rapids 4 1,300 High Gradient Riffles 5 Low Gradient Riffles 6 Glides 7 Runs 8 Step-Runs/Step Pools 9 Pocket Water 10 Sheetflow 11 Lower Site Gradient 5.5% 1,250 1,200 Elevation (ft) Convergence Pool 12 Mid-Channel Pool 13 Lateral Pool 14 Trench Pool 15 Gradient 3.4% 1,150 Plunge Pool 16 Junction with Middle Yuba Geology - Mesozoic volcanic rocks of the Smartville Complex 17 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 Gradient break River Mile 1,100 = Site Location 6

Oregon Creek Upstream of Log Cabin Diversion Dam Reach (Non-Project) Project(s): Fish Note: General area, but will be defined in field (limited aerial video) Site: 1 of 3 Rivermile: Approx. 4.7 Elevation: 1,996 ft. Lat: 39 26'30.35 Long: 121 3 20.13 Video: 02:19:49 7

Oregon Creek Downstream of Log Cabin Diversion Dam Reach Project(s): BMI Site: 2 of 3 Rivermile: Approx. 3.6 Elevation: 1,890 ft. Lat: 39 26' 11.24 Long: 121 3' 36.92" Video: 02:19:49 8

Oregon Creek Log Cabin Diversion Dam Reach Project(s): Fish, BMI, Mollusks (Note: Can t go much upstream to stay on Forest Service Land for Mollusks) Site: 3 of 3 Rivermile: Approx. 0.4 Elevation: 1,499 ft. Lat: 39 23 55.06 Long: 121 04 44.71 Video: 01:56:14 9

Oregon Creek, Log Cabin Diversion Dam Reach Habitat Summary Chart Log Cabin Dam Falls Cascades 1 2 Average Gradient: 2.3% 2,000 Chutes Rapids 3 4 Celestial Valley Road RM 3.6 3.7% 1,900 High Gradient Riffles 5 Below LCDD BMI Site Low Gradient Riffles Glides 6 7 1,800 Runs 8 Step-Runs/Step Pools 9 Pocket Water 10 1.6% 1,700 Elevation (ft) Sheetflow 11 Convergence Pool 12 4.6% 1,600 Mid-Channel Pool 13 Lateral Pool 14 Trench Pool 15 1.9% Plunge Pool 16 Junction w/ Middle Yuba 17 Log Cabin DD Reach Site 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 1,500 1,400 Gradient Break = Site Location River Mile Note: Site above LCDD, not shown 10

Middle Yuba River Our House Diversion Dam Reach (Non-Project) Project(s): Fish Site: 1 of 4 (Upstream of OHDD) Rivermile: Approx. 12.2 Elevation: 2,038 ft. Lat: 39 24 52.15 Long: 120 59 27.75 Video: 02:10:54 ~OR~ 11

Middle Yuba River Our House Diversion Dam Reach Project(s): Fish, BMI, Mollusks (Option - 1) Site: 2 of 4 (Upper Site) Rivermile: Approx. 11.7 Elevation: 1,965 ft. Lat: 39 24 38.8 Long: 120 59 52.62 Video: 02:09:10 12

Middle Yuba River Our House Diversion Dam Reach Project(s): Fish, BMI, Mollusks (Option - 2) Site: 3 of 4 (Lower Site) Rivermile: Approx. 4.7 Elevation: 1,445 ft. Lat: 39 23 37.63 Long: 121 04 51.22 Video: 01:53:19 13

Middle Yuba River Oregon Creek Reach Project(s): Fish, BMI, Mollusks (Option - 3) Note: To be an option for Mollusks, the site must be upstream of the tributary Site: 4 of 4 Rivermile: Approx. 3.4 Elevation: 1,390 ft. Lat: 39 23 14.99 Long: 121 05 44.06 Video: 01:50:19 14

Middle Yuba River, Our House Diversion Dam and Oregon Creek Reaches Habitat Summary Chart Falls 0 Gradient - 1.8% Cascades1 2 Hwy 49; Oregon Ck Junction Chutes 3 Rapids 4 Sheet Flow 5 High Gradient Riffles6 Low Gradient Riffles7 Glides8 9 Runs 10 Step-Runs/Step Pools 11 Pocket Water 12 Freemans Crossing Mid-Channel Pool 13 Lateral Pool 14 15 Trench Pool 16 Plunge Pool 17 Convergence Pool 18 Split 19 Lower Site Oregon Creek Reach Site Geology - gabbroic ploutonic, Smartville Complex Junction with North Yuba Upper Site Emory Island - Split Channel (main channel mapped) 2,000 Our House Dam 1,900 1,800 1,700 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 River Mile 1,600 1,500 1,400 1,300 1,200 1,100 Elevation (ft) = Site Location Note: Site above OHDD, not shown 15

Yuba River Middle/North Yuba River Reach Project(s): Fish No Forest Service Land--No Aquatic Mollusk Sampling Site 1 of 3 (Upper Site) Rivermile: Approx. 39.4 Elevation: 1,149 ft. Lat: 39 22 03.30 Long: 121 08 08.91 Video: 01:42:33 16

Yuba River Middle/North Yuba River Reach Project(s): Fish, BMI No Forest Service Land--No Aquatic Mollusk Sampling Site 2 of 3 (Lower Site) Rivermile: Approx. 34.5 Elevation: 564 ft. Lat: 39 19 52.17 Long: 121 10 59.99 Video: 00:31:10 17

Yuba River New Colgate Powerhouse Reach Project(s): Fish, BMI (if wadeable) No Forest Service Land--No Aquatic Mollusk Sampling Site 3 of 3 Rivermile: Approx. 33.0 Elevation: 528 ft. Lat: 39 18 44.88 Long: 121 12 17.52 Video: 00:28:22 18

Yuba River, Middle/North Yuba River and New Colgate Powerhouse Reaches Habitat Summary Chart New Colgate PH Reach Falls 1 Cascades 2 Chutes 3 Rapids 4 Sheet Flow5 High Gradient Riffles 6 Low Gradient Riffles 7 Glides 8 Middle/North Yuba River Reach Average Gradient: 1.8% Upper Site North Yuba/Midde Yuba Junction 1,040 940 Runs 9 Step-Runs/Step Pools 10 Pocket Water 11 Mid-Channel Pool 12 Lateral Pool 13 840 740 Elevation (ft) Trench Pool 14 Plunge Pool 15 Convergence Pool 16 New Colgate PH Lower Site 640 Out of View 17 Split 18 19 Geology - gabbro (Pleasant Valley pluton), volcanic (Smartville Complex), quartz diorite 540 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 New Colgate PH Reach Site = Site Location 19 River Mile