Progress Report on Long Period Seismographs

Similar documents
Phase Velocities of Long-Period Surface Waves and Structure of the Upper Mantle

TWO SLOW SURFACE WAVES ACROSS NORTH AMERICA* By FRANK PRESS and MAURICE EWING

Upper Mantle Structure under Oceans and Continents from Rayleigh Waves"

CRUSTAL STRUCTURE AND SURFACE-WAVE DISPERSION. PART II SOLOMON ISLANDS EARTHQUAKE OF JULY 29, 1950* By MAURICE EWING and FRANK PRESS

Multi-station Seismograph Network

) of the earth's core for body waves from the Marshall Islands region

Seismometer. Stefanie Donner

Earthquake Lab Introduction: Purpose: Method: Equipment needed: Fundamental Concepts and Key Terms:

Earthquakes. Forces Within Eartth. Faults form when the forces acting on rock exceed the rock s strength.

Earthquakes How and Where Earthquakes Occur

Earthquakes. Photo credit: USGS

Global geophysics and wave propagation

Dangerous tsunami threat off U.S. West Coast

Lecture 4: Earthquakes and Seismic Waves

An Earthquake is a rapid vibration or shaking of the Earth s crust created by a release in energy from sudden movement of a part of a plate along a

EXCITATION OF MANTLE RAYLEIGH WAVES OF PERIOD 100 SECOI~TDS AS A FUNCTION OF MAGNITUDE. [BY JA~ES N. BRUNE AND CHI-Yu KING*

Elastic rebound theory

OVERVIEW INTRODUCTION 3 WHAT'S MISSING? 4 OBJECTIVES 5

SURFACE WAVE DISPERSION PRACTICAL (Keith Priestley)

Part 2 - Engineering Characterization of Earthquakes and Seismic Hazard. Earthquake Environment

Earthquake. What is it? Can we predict it?

The Solid Earth Chapter 4 Answers to selected questions. (1) Love waves involve transverse motion, generally arrive before Rayleigh waves.

PEAT SEISMOLOGY Lecture 9: Anisotropy, attenuation and anelasticity

Imaging sharp lateral velocity gradients using scattered waves on dense arrays: faults and basin edges

INTERPRETATION OF SEISMOGRAMS

Chapter 3. The Role of Seismology

SURFACE WAVE MODELLING USING SEISMIC GROUND RESPONSE ANALYSIS

Seismic Recording Station AZ_PFO Summary Report

crustal thicknesses. earthquakes as in recorded

Dynamic Crust Practice

Earthquakes and Earthquake Hazards Earth - Chapter 11 Stan Hatfield Southwestern Illinois College

21. Earthquakes I (p ; 306)

A RAPID METHOD FOR CALIBRATING WILLMORE SEISMOGRAPHS

7.2.1 Seismic waves. Waves in a mass- spring system

Apparent Slow Oceanic Transform Earthquakes Due to Source Mechanism Bias

Name Class Date. 1. What is the outermost layer of the Earth called?. a. core b. lithosphere c. asthenosphere d. mesosphere

Seismic Recording Station TA_109C Summary Report

Earthquakes.

5. What is an earthquake 6. Indicate the approximate radius of the earth, inner core, and outer core.

S e i s m i c W a v e s

A. rift valley B. deep trench C. volcanic cone D. uplifted mountain. A. a volcanic island arc B. a large watershed area

Section Forces Within Earth. 8 th Grade Earth & Space Science - Class Notes

GEOLOGY MEDIA SUITE Chapter 13

CHAPTER 1 BASIC SEISMOLOGY AND EARTHQUAKE TERMINOLGY. Earth Formation Plate Tectonics Sources of Earthquakes...

A magnitude 7.4 earthquake struck 255 km (158 miles) southwest of Tonga, according to the US Geological Survey, but there were no reports of damage.

Topic 12: Dynamic Earth Pracatice

ERTH2020 Introduction to Geophysics The Seismic Method. 1. Basic Concepts in Seismology. 1.1 Seismic Wave Types

9 June 15. Horst Rademacher. Lect 4: Seismic Waves. Summer Session 2015

EXCITATION AND PROPAGATION OF SHORT-PERIOD SURFACE WAVES IN YOUNG SEAFLOOR. Donald W. Forsyth. Department of Geological Sciences, Brown University

UNIT - 7 EARTHQUAKES

Forces in the Earth s crust

Seismic Waves. 1. Seismic Deformation

Displacement at very low frequencies produces very low accelerations since:

Section 19.1: Forces Within Earth Section 19.2: Seismic Waves and Earth s Interior Section 19.3: Measuring and Locating.

Moho (Mohorovicic discontinuity) - boundary between crust and mantle

By: Tiffany Norton Ashleigh Ibos

PEAT SEISMOLOGY Lecture 12: Earthquake source mechanisms and radiation patterns II

Earthquake. earthquake, epicenters in the U.S. Kobe, Japan deaths

Standard 2, Objective 1: Evaluate the source of Earth s internal heat and the evidence of Earth s internal structure.

A Violent Pulse: Earthquakes. Lecture #2

NAME HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT #4 MATERIAL COVERS CHAPTERS 19, 20, 21, & 2

Chapter 7 Plate Tectonics

Prentice Hall EARTH SCIENCE

Essential Questions. How can one explain & predict interactions b/t objects & within systems of objects.

UGRC 144 Science and Technology in Our Lives/Geohazards

FOCAL MECHANISM DETERMINATION OF LOCAL EARTHQUAKES IN MALAY PENINSULA

Page 1. Name:

Global Seismology Chapter 4

Three Fs of earthquakes: forces, faults, and friction. Slow accumulation and rapid release of elastic energy.

Determining the Earthquake Epicenter: Japan

Name Date Class. radiate in all directions, carrying some of the. of plate boundaries have different usual patterns of.

Earthquakes. Pt Reyes Station 1906

Introduction to Earthquake Seismology Assignment 18

Earthquakes Chapter 19

Surface Waves and Free Oscillations. Surface Waves and Free Oscillations

1. A few words about EarthScope and USArray. 3. Tomography using noise and Aki s method

Earthquakes Modified

Earthquakes. Building Earth s Surface, Part 2. Science 330 Summer What is an earthquake?

10/18/2011. Chapter 8. Elastic Rebound Theory. Introduction. Earthquakes. and the Earth s Interior. Introduction. Introduction.

Please be sure to save a copy of this activity to your computer!

INTRODUCTION TO EARTHQUAKES

Seismic Analysis of Structures Prof. T.K. Datta Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi. Lecture - 01 Seismology

Topic 5: The Dynamic Crust (workbook p ) Evidence that Earth s crust has shifted and changed in both the past and the present is shown by:

log 4 0.7m log m Seismic Analysis of Structures by TK Dutta, Civil Department, IIT Delhi, New Delhi. Module 1 Seismology Exercise Problems :

Physics Curriculum Map - Norwell High School SUBJECT: Physics Grade Level: 11 or 12. Month or Unit: September

Earthquakes and Earth s Chapter. Interior

NYS STANDARD/KEY IDEA/PERFORMANCE INDICATOR 5.1 a-e. 5.1a Measured quantities can be classified as either vector or scalar.

Seismic Waves NOTES.notebook. January 05, lithosphere. limit. elastic. fault. movement. Fault. fault. all. Seismic waves focus. interior.

Anatomy of an Earthquake Focus (or hypocentre): the center of energy release.

Earthquakes and Earth s Interior

Homework II Seismological Topics

BULLETIN OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA VOL. 66. PP FIGS. MAY 1964

THE SEISMICITY OF THE EARTH

Instructor: Ms. Terry J. Boroughs Geology 305 Restless/Dynamic EARTH: Geologic Structures (Folds & faults); Earthquakes; and the Earth s Interior

SURFACE WAVES AND SEISMIC RESPONSE OF LONG-PERIOD STRUCTURES

Aftershock From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Instructor: Ms. Terry J. Boroughs Geology 300 Restless/Dynamic EARTH: Geologic Structures (Folds & faults); Earthquakes; and the Earth s Interior

BEYOND TRAVELTIMES AND EARTHQUAKE LOCATION What else can seismograms tell us about the nature of earthquakes on faults?

Dynamic Earth A B1. Which type of plate boundary is located at the Jordan Fault? (1) divergent (3) convergent (2) subduction (4) transform

1 The frequency response of the basic mechanical oscillator

Transcription:

Progress Report on Long Period Seismographs Hugo Benioff and Frank Press (Received 1958 May 27) Summa y Long period seismograph systems in operation in Pasadena are described. Extension of the group velocity curves for mantle Rayleigh waves and G-waves, the detection of these waves from earthquakes in the magnitude range 52-7, and the recording of unusual body waves with unsuspected long period components are among the results which have been achieved.. nstruments For a number of years the research programme of the Seismological Laboratory of the California nstitute of Technology has included the development of seismographs especially designed for extending the observed seismic spectrum to longer periods. The first of such instruments was an electromagnetic strain seismograph with galvanometric recording. This combination has a period response characteristic identical with that of a displacement transducer pendulum seismograph having a period and damping constant equal to the period and damping constant of the galvanometer. The original electromagnetic strain seismograph recorded with a galvanometer of 35 s period and thus was equivalent to a 35 s pendulum. A seismogram of the Japanese earthquake of 1933 March z made with this instrument clearly recorded mantle Rayleigh waves although they were not then recognized as such. Some years later the galvanometer period was increased to 90 s and still later it was increased to 180 s (Benioff, Gutenberg & Richter 1954). This latter combination recorded mantle Rayleigh waves up to about 8 min period and other longer period wavelets in the Kamchatka earthquake of 1952 November 4. With the completion of the fused quartz extensometer at sabella, California, a combination with a response equivalent to that of a pendulum of 10 min period was constructed. This employed a 10 min period galvanometer developed by Francis Lehner, coupled to the displacement transducer of the extensometer through a capacity-resistance differentiation network. Although the noise level in this combination is high owing to the response to surface temperature variations of the ground and to uncompensated barometric variations, it makes a satisfactory instrument for large earthquakes. At Columbia University, Press and Ewing approached the problem of extension of the long wave portion of the spectrum by extensive modification of the Galitzin seismograph. Their first design in 1951 used a pendulum period of 15 s coupled to a galvanometer of 70 s. The vertical component instrument was provided with zo8

Progress report on long period seismographs 209 a LaCoste zero-length spring and in addition was compensated for barometric pressure variations. Both vertical and horizontal component units were designed to have negligible thermal response. n a later modification, carried out at Pasadena with Francis Lehner (Press, Ewing 8z Lehner 1958), the pendulum is operated at 30s period with a Lehner galvanometer of 90s period. Although the period bandwidth of this combination is less than that of the long period strain seismograph, it can be operated at much higher magnificationowing in part to the restricted bandwidth. n addition it offers matched vertical and horizontal recording. The lack of vertical component response represents a serious limitation of the strain seismograph. v = 3'57 h/s- 0' To = Tg = 12.5s- To = 100s Tg =i 90s- To = 30s Tg = 90s- VR-tC To = 2 s Tg = 600-1 0' C.-- 10' : 1 O1 E s M 0' 10 00 000 T-Wave Period in Seconds FG..-Response curves for long period seismograph systems. Topendulum period ; T,-galvanometer period ; VR +&-variable reluc tance transducer with condenser shunt; V-phase velocity applicable to strain seismograph curve. A simple modification making possible longer period pendulums was made by Ralph Gilman. t consists of a negative restoring force introduced into the pendulum system by means of a controlled DC current flowing through an auxiliary transducer. n this way he has increased the pendulum period to roo s. A further modification of the Press-Ewing vertical instrument has extended the period of the vertical component seismometer to 80 s. Another approach to long period recording made by Hugo Benioff uses a relatively short period reluctance pendulum seismometer (TO = 2 to 3 s) with a condenser shunted across the transducer coils and coupled to a 10 min period Lehner galvanometer. Response curves of these instruments are presented in Figure. The different systems complement each other in bandwidth and magnification so that a wide portion of the spectrum is covered with relatively large dynamic range. One of the main advantages of long period seismographs such as these is the diminished response to waves with periods less than 20 s which obscure longer period phases on standard instruments.

210 Hugo Beniodt and F d Press 2. Mantle Rayleigh waves For wavelengths much larger than the thickness of the crust (periods greater than 75 s), Rayleigh wave dispersion is influenced primarily by the shear wave velocity variation with depth in the mantle and the vanishing rigidity in the core (Ewing & Press 1956). A further effect of the vertical velocity variation in the mantle is the production of maximal values in group velocity at 30 s periods for t FG. 2.-Mantle and crustal Rayleigh waves showing impulsive initiation corresponding to maximum value of group velocity. Loyalty slands earthquake of 1956 November 26, magnitude 6%. Upper trace Press- Ewing Z, To = 30 s, T, = 90 s; lower trace Benioff Z, To = 2 s, T, = 180 s, M) mf shunt, CRDX = 130000 ohms. Crust Mantle l l 1 l l 1 t 1 J J.o l l 1 1. 0 20 50 00 200 500 Period-s FG. 3.-Mantle and crustal Rayleigh wave dispersion curve showing new data for maximum group velocity from earthquake of 1956 November 26. Oceanic data: Ewing & Press 1954. Continental data: Ewing (in press). Mantle data: Ewing & Press 1952. 0 1956 November 26, 23: 29: 41. oceanic Rayleigh waves and 70 s periods for continental Rayleigh waves. Since large amplitudes are associated with stationary values of group velocity, oceanic Rayleigh waves are impulsively initiated on long period seismographs (Figure 2). Moreover the use of instruments with different responses permits separation of the regular and anomalous dispersion branches associated with the group velocity maximum. These dispersion data are plotted in Figure 3, together with results

Progress report on long period seismograph from earlier studies. This represents the first time that crustal and mantle Rayleigh waves traversing the short arc could be analysed from the same earthquake. A gap in the dispersion curves for these waves was filled in this way. There is a suggestion in the group velocity data of Figure 3 of a flattening of the curve for periods beyond 400 seconds. This has been interpreted as an effect of vanishing rigidity in the core. Additional experimental verification which places this trend in the group velocity curve on a more firm basis is shown in Figure 4. 211 4' 40 m E: g 3.9 lg = 9OSec. NOV. S. 1912 X RO z m SABELLA STRAN, 19 '600 Sac. * DEC. 17, 1957. e R, $ 3-7 s SABELLA STRAN. tg 9 600 115. DEC.4. 1957. OR2 OR3 PASADENA PRESS-EWNG 9 3-6 to=30sec. tg-90rec.. DEC.4.1957 OR, 0 R5 P Rs OR, OR8 3.5 @RS ero 8 Rll 8Rlt 4 R13 3.4 0 PEROD N SECONDS FG. 4.-New data for mantle Rayleigh wave dispersion in the period range T > 300 s. Dashed curve represents modification.,, 0230 02.40 0250 0300 03 10 FG. S.-Three component seismograms To = 30 s, T, = go s showing mantle Rayleigh waves of order R,, from the Mongolian earthquake of 1957 December 4, magnitude 7.9. Data for mantle Rayleigh waves of order R16, R17, R18 from the Mongolian earthquake 1957 December 4 were used. The seismograms for RB are shown in Figure 5. This group travelled a distance of 349 600 km. The proper retrograde elliptical orbital motion for these waves, demonstrated by comparison of the E-W and vertical component traces, served to distinguish the signal from the background. Previously, mantle Rayleigh waves were thought to be generated only by the greatest earthquakes. t is not uncommon with the long period instruments to

212 Hugo Benioff and Frank Press 00: 59 --%-fvlj%pw MANTLE R, 02:i)o FG. 6.-Mantle Rayleigh waves R, and R, corresponding to anomalous dispersion branch of group velocity curve. Tonga sland earthquake of 1956 December 27, h = 300km, magnitude 77a; Upper traces 2, To = 30 s, T, = 90 s; lower traces 2, To = z s, T, = 180 8, condenser shunt. record these oscillations from teleseisms with magnitude as small as 6g (Figures 2 and 6). Note the greater suppression of shorter period crustal Rayleigh waves in the instrument TO = 2 s, Tg = 180 s. 3. GWaves G-waves are horizontally polarized shear waves in which the principal components propagate with the velocity 4.38 kmls (Benioff 1955). They are related to Love waves in that the velocity of the long period initial waves of the Love wave train exhibit the same velocity. t has been thought that G propagation is controlled by a flat portion in the Love wave group velocity curve as shown in Figure 7 Group velocity Oceanic Love waves r waves 5 - '- Continental Love waves Period FG. 7.-Schematic Love wave--(;-wave dispersion curve.

Progress report on long period seismographs 2'3 by the heavy line. This would account for its impulsive initiation, and its efficient propagation. The different extent of the flat portion for the oceanic and continental curve would explain the observation that G-waves with oceanic paths occur typically as pulses (Figure 9) in contrast to the train of shorter period Love waves which develops from G after passage across a continent. -. - \-- v - ------r- V -7 FG. 8. G-wave anomalous dispersion corresponding to dashed portion of Figure 7. Mantle Rayleigh wave is shown for comparison. G: Pasadena E-W To = OO s, T, = 90 s 1958 April 13; 53"N, 161"E, A = 59', M = 6a. R: sabella Strain T, = 600 s 1957 December 4; 45+"N, 994" E, A = 94", M = 7.9. ;Lq 1 5min ' ~? % h w w % # ~ ~ : W ; W W ~ ~, ~ ~, ~ ~ MwwlsWHWfJ,$,*/vvw+PY ~ ~ ~ ~.. +#-wm*w ~ ~ b G FG. g.--g-wave from small magnitude earthquake. N-S, To = 30 s, T, = 90 s. 1956 September 24.07: 02: 13, Fiji slands, A - 85", M N 53. That the G-wave dispersion curve is a true maximum with a decrease in velocity for periods greater than about 2 min is shown by the seismogram in Figure 8, made with the Gilman E-W seismograph. A long period tail is shown for this G-wave with a character of striking similarity to the mantle Rayleigh waves also shown. t may be that this long period tail has been detected with the new instrument because the higher overall sensitivity permits use of G phases from earthquakes of smaller magnitude, hence of different spectrum from G generated by

214 Hugo Benioff and Frank Press larger earthquakes. The G-wave velocity is significantly less than the shear velocity of 4-7 km/s observed in the upper mantle. This may be the result of a low velocity layer in the mantle or simply a consequence of the occurrence of a maximum in group velocity due to the general velocity increase with depth in the mantle. G previously was recorded for earthquakes of large magnitude. This was supposed to be a manifestation of the increase, with magnitude, of long period components in the spectrum of waves radiated from the source. G-wave recordings have been obtained from earthquakes with magnitude as small as 58 (Figure 9) making it more likely that the earlier correlation with magnitude was partly a matter of insufficient instrumental response to G-wave periods. That G-waves are efficiently excited by small earthquakes raises the interesting possibility that small, slow movements along faults with great extent may be involved. 5 min. (PSPSPS)z FG. 0.-Multiple reflected body waves traversing major arc. 1956 May 23, 20 : 48 : 28 Fiji slands h = 402 km M = 7-f A1 = 75a" As = 284.b" E-W, To = 30 s, T, = go s 4. Body waves The P phase initiates a short period reverberation which makes it difficult to determine the character of later phases. Moreover crustal surface waves can mask the arrival of body waves which have traversed the major arc. Long period seismographs with reduced response to waves with periods less than about 20s produce records of body waves which could not have otherwise been detected.

Progress report on long period seismographs 215 Unsuspected long period components in the spectrum of body waves are revealed. The pulse shapes of these phases exhibit simple characteristic forms which must ultimately be related to the mechanism at the focus. - (PSPSPS), d MN. FG. triple reflected PS traversing major arc. sabella Strain, T, = 600 s, 1957 December 4. i \ 71 - d z To = 2 T,= 180 100 pf shunt z To = 30 T, = 90 E -W TO = 30 = 90 FG. 12. Body waves recorded with two different long period systems. 1956 December 18, 02 : 31 : 00. ChileArgentine border M = 7-7). Figures 10 and show multiple reflected body waves which have traversed the major arc. Figure 12 contrasts seismograms of body waves on different instruments. Note the simplicity in form and the long period components in the condenser shunted instrument with To = 2 s, Tg = 180 S. Seismological Laboratory California nstitute of Technology Pasadena, California, (Division of the Geological Sciences, Contribution No. 886). 1958 May 22. References Benioff, H., Gutenberg, B. & Richter, C. F., 1954. Trans. Amer. Geophys. Un., 35, 984. Benioff, H., Gutenberg, - B. and Richter, C. F., 1955. Trans. Amer. Geophys. Un., 36, 7 5. Ewing, M. & Press, F., 1956. Trans. Amer. Geophys. Un., 37, 213. Press, F., Ewing, M. & Lehner, F., 1958. Trans. Amer. Geophys. Un., 39, 106.