GROUNDWATER PATHWAY MAPPING USING AIRBORNE GEOPHYSICS: TWO CASE STUDIES

Similar documents
GPR AS A COST EFFECTIVE BEDROCK MAPPING TOOL FOR LARGE AREAS. Abstract

Land Subsidence. Land subsidence is defined as the lowering of the land surface.

KARST MAPPING WITH GEOPHYSICS AT MYSTERY CAVE STATE PARK, MINNESOTA

ambiguity in earth sciences IESO Geophysics Section Eddy hartantyo, Lab Geofisika FMIPA UGM

Geophysics for Environmental and Geotechnical Applications

Instructional Objectives

Applied Geophysics for Environmental Site Characterization and Remediation

FINAL REPORT GEOPHYSICAL INVESTIGATION WATER TOWER NO. 6 SITE PLANT CITY, FL

Finding Large Capacity Groundwater Supplies for Irrigation

Sabal Trail Pipeline Project Evaluation of Karst Topography and Sinkhole Potential for Pipeline and Facilities

Sabal Trail Pipeline Project Evaluation of Karst Topography and Sinkhole Potential for Pipeline and Facilities

GEOPHYSICAL SITE CHARACTERIZATION IN SUPPORT OF HIGHWAY EXPANSION PROJECT

Geophysical Exploration in Water Resources Assessment. John Mundell, P.E., L.P.G., P.G. Ryan Brumbaugh, L.P.G. Mundell & Associates, Inc.

Case Study: University of Connecticut (UConn) Landfill

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING II. Subject Code : 06CV64 Internal Assessment Marks : 25 PART A UNIT 1

An Introduction to Field Explorations for Foundations

The three-year mapping and monitoring of underground cavity expansion with 2D resistivity survey: What has revealed?

BUFFALO RIVER COALITION PO Box 101, Jasper, AR (870)

Prediction of Areas Sensitive to Fertilizer Application in Thinly-Soiled Karst

Oak Ridge IFRC. Quantification of Plume-Scale Flow Architecture and Recharge Processes

APPLICATION OF RESISTIVITY SURVEY TO INVESTIGATE SINKHOLE AND KARST FEATURES IN SOUTHERN THAILAND : A CASE STUDY OF PAKJAM AREA

Advanced processing and inversion of two AEM datasets for 3D geological modelling: the case study of Spiritwood Valley Aquifer

ENCE 3610 Soil Mechanics. Site Exploration and Characterisation Field Exploration Methods

Chapter 14: Groundwater. Fig 14.5b

Darnley Bay Resources Preliminary Airborne Survey Results

SITE INVESTIGATION 1

Lecture 15: Subsidence

10. GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION PROGRAM

IMAGING OF DEEP SINKHOLES USING THE MULTI-ELECTRODE RESISTIVITY IMPLANT TECHNIQUE (MERIT) CASE STUDIES IN FLORIDA

EXTREMELY FAST IP USED TO DELINEATE BURIED LANDFILLS. Norman R. Carlson, Cris Mauldin Mayerle, and Kenneth L. Zonge

Amistad Dam Investigation and Oversight: Karst- Founded Dam on the USA-Mexico Border

Geological Mapping using Geophysics

Prepared for: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Mobile District 109 St. Joseph Street, Mobile, Alabama Prepared by:

PART I A BRIEF SUMMARY OF SIX ROADWAY INVESTIGATIONS IN KARST

Development of geophysical investigation for verifying treatment efficiency of underground cavities


PRELIMINARY. Select Geophysical Methods and Groundwater Modeling: Examples from USGS studies. Claudia Faunt and a cast of others

Geophysical Methods for Screening and Investigating Utility Waste Landfill Sites in Karst Terrain

Characterization Of A VOC Plume Migrating From Fractured Shale Into A Karst Limestone Aquifer

Does the SDCP need inputs from geology?

EMERGENCY INVESTIGATION OF EXTREMELY LARGE SINKHOLES, MAOHE, GUANGXI, CHINA

Hydraulic Impacts of Limestone Quarries and Gravel Pits. Jeff Green Minnesota DNR-Division of Ecological & Water Resources

Common Exploration Methods.

Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC Mountain Valley Pipeline Project FERC Docket No. CP

Bedrock Characterization Mottolo Pig Farm Superfund Site

Detailed Low-Induction-Number EM Sounding to 9-m Depth

An airborne EM survey of a landfill that leaked

MAPPING BEDROCK: Verifying Depth to Bedrock in Calumet County using Seismic Refraction

Ground-Water Exploration in the Worthington Area of Nobles County: Summary of Seismic Data and Recent Test Drilling Results

Seismic Reflection Imaging across the Johnson Ranch, Valley County, Idaho

KARST LANDSCAPES Geology & Hydrology. Dr. Gerald E. Weber

Potential for dissolution breccia in Paleozoic carbonate units in the Rosemont area of the northern Santa Rita Mountains

Fort McClellan Calhoun County, Alabama. Prepared for: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Mobile District 109 St. Joseph Street Mobile, Alabama 36602

ENGINEER S CERTIFICATION OF FAULT AREA DEMONSTRATION (40 CFR )

Gotechnical Investigations and Sampling

Shallow Karst Aquifer System of the Lake Belt Study Area, Miami-Dade County, Florida, USA EXTENDED ABSTRACT

Florida s Karst Geology

APPENDIX F OKANAGAN VALLEY SEISMIC SURVEY

LOCATING AND CHARACTERIZING ABANDONED MINES USING MICROGRAVITY by Richard C. Benson 1, Ronald D. Kaufmann 1, Lynn Yuhr 1, Richard Hopkins 2 ABSTRACT

J.H. Campbell Generating Facility Pond A - Location Restriction Certification Report

Prof. Stephen A. Nelson EENS 111. Groundwater

FINAL REPORT GEOPHYSICAL INVESTIGATION VILLAGE ALHAMBRA RETENTION POND SITE THE VILLAGES, FLORIDA

A Preliminary Geophysical Reconnaissance Mapping of Emirau Ground Water Resource, Emirau Island, New Ireland Province, PNG

REPORT OF GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY

Use of Tracer Dyes to Understand Fractured Bedrock Flow during a Pumping Test

Joint Interpretation of Magnetotelluric and Seismic Models for Exploration of the Gross Schoenebeck Geothermal Site

LBJWC - Sinkhole Lesson

Subsidence and Sinkholes

Guidelines for Site-Specific Seismic Hazard Reports for Essential and Hazardous Facilities and Major and Special-Occupancy Structures in Oregon

STUDY GUIDE FOR CONTENT MASTERY. Movement and Storage of Groundwater

INNOVATIVE TECHNIQUES TO INVESTIGATE CONTAMINATION IN FRACTURED BEDROCK

Karst Topography In order to understand karst topography we must first have a basic understanding of the water cycle, the formation of limestone (carb

Site characterization at the Groundwater Remediation Field Laboratory

GEOPHYSICAL IMAGING TO ENHANCE ANALYSIS, DESIGN AND DRILLING OF LARGE-SCALE GEOTHERMAL SYSTEMS. Abstract

EVALUATION OF NEW GEOPHYSICAL TOOLS FOR INVESTIGATION OF A LANDFILL, CAMP ROBERTS, CALIFORNIA. Abstract

Multimethod Geophysical Characterization of Fault Systems for Environmental Planning

ANALYSIS OF LOCALIZED HIGH MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY ZONES AT JEFFERSON PROVING GROUND, INDIANA

Using Airborne Geophysical Survey for Exploring and Assessment of Groundwater Potentiality in Arid Regions

2 Geology. 2.1 Elements of Terrane Analysis. Terrane or Terrain? Potential receptors

ANGLE-DEPENDENT TOMOSTATICS. Abstract

Although most karstic regions

HYDROGEOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF THE UG2 PYROXENITE AQUIFERS OF THE BUSHVELD COMPLEX

Ground Water in the Piedmont and Blue Ridge

Technical Requirements of Geothermal Exploration in the RSM DADI THORBJORNSON, RSM CONSULTANT WORKSHOP SWISS HOTEL IZMIR 5 JULY 2018

MAPPING STRUCTURAL PATHWAYS FOR DNAPL TRANSPORT IN KARST USING INDUCED POLARIZATION

Engineering Geophysical Application to Mine Subsidence Risk Assessment

Enhanced Characterization of the Mississippi River Valley Alluvial Aquifer Using Surface Geophysical Methods

Geophysical Site Investigation (Seismic methods) Amit Prashant Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar

Location of Abandoned Water Wells by Magnetic Surveys over the Edwards Aquifer in the San Antonio Area, Texas. Abstract. 1.


Acquisition and preliminary analysis of the Castle Mountain shallow VSP dataset

Fox 2-Record No. 2524

Multi-Method Geophysical Approach for Characterizing a Deep Fractured Bedrock Aquifer, Anniston Army Depot, Anniston, Alabama

FRACTURE TRACES AND PRODUCTIVITY OF MUNICIPAL WELLS IN THE MADISON LIMESTONE, RAPID CITY, SOUTH DAKOTA

Chapter 13. Groundwater

First Field Test of NAPL Detection with High Resolution Borehole Seismic Imaging

Summary. Introduction. Theory and/or Method

Geology 103 Planet Earth (QR II), Laboratory Exercises 1. Groundwater

EARLY-TIME, MULTI-COMPONENT MOBILE TEM FOR DEEP METAL DETECTION. Abstract

Chapter 14. Groundwater

Transcription:

GROUNDWATER PATHWAY MAPPING USING AIRBORNE GEOPHYSICS: TWO CASE STUDIES Wayne Mandell 1, T. Jeffrey Gamey 2, William Doll 2 1 U.S. Army Environmental Center, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, 21010 (wayne.mandell@aec.apgea.army.mil) 2 Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, 37831-6038 (gameytj@ornl.gov, dollwe@ornl.gov) Abstract The application of airborne geophysics to groundwater pathway mapping is detailed at two military sites in the USA. The first case involves DNAPL contamination at Camp Crowder, Missouri resulting from rocket component testing. Contaminants percolate through a cherty residuum into a karst aquifer and towards contaminated wells via unknown pathways. The importance of an integrated approach is stressed. This study employed well logs, photo-geologic analysis, airborne electromagnetic and magnetic surveys, seismic profiling, and two-dimensional electrical resistivity imaging. The results provided a three-dimensional regional image of the bedrock topography that has been confirmed with follow-up bore holes. The second case was also designed to map bedrock topography with airborne electromagnetics at Fort Detrick, Maryland, but in a much shallower setting. The use of a priori knowledge to set airborne system parameters is emphasized. The use of routine, but seemingly unnecessary technologies as part of a general screening process led to a surprising result, which called into question several years of ground geophysical interpretation. Introduction Camp Crowder, a Missouri Army National Guard training facility located south of Neosho, Missouri, is part of the Pool s Prairie NPL site. This facility was used for rocket engine and components testing for many years. Resulting DNAPL contamination found within the soil and groundwater is suspected of migrating off-post through conduit and fracture systems within the underlying karst bedrock. Dye tracer studies have confirmed groundwater movement towards the contaminated wells, though the actual route of migration is not known. The overburden is dominantly a cherty residuum, through which the surface water and contaminants percolate into the underlying karst aquifer. An integrated approach using photo-geologic analysis, airborne electromagnetic surveys, seismic profiling, and twodimensional electrical resistivity imaging (2D-ERI) was conducted to map subsurface changes associated with this complex karst system. Each of the various data sets provides a unique and valuable input to the interpretation process. The integration approach was to start with point data from bore holes, expanding to local surveys with surface geophysics, then continuing to a regional survey with airborne geophysics. The regional data were then used to locate other potential sites for higher resolution ground surveys, followed by directed drilling and treatment. Fort Detrick is an active U.S. Army base in Frederick, Maryland. The objective at this site was to map basement topography for ground water pathways. An airborne electromagnetic survey was planned to complement ground-based resistivity surveys, and to form a basis for tying ground surveys into a regional context. A magnetometer survey was unnecessary for this objective as there were no ferrous objects or targets in the otherwise open field. Since it could be flown with minimal additional effort, however, it was included in the airborne work plan. The resulting magnetic map showed an intricate network of underground pipes covering the entire survey area that were being misinterpreted as geologic features in the resistivity surveys. Camp Crowder The geology at Camp Crowder is dominated by a highly weathered cherty residuum at surface, with a continuous transition to competent limestone at depth. The depth to competent bedrock is highly variable, making ground water pathways unpredictable, although there is a shallow regional dip to the

northeast. Drilling encountered DNAPLs in the immediate vicinity of the Engine Test Area (ETA) and the Component Test Area (CTA) (Figure 1). Dye trace experiments showed that some pathways led to springs in the next valley over on the northeast side of the base. Drilling also revealed the irregular bedrock topography and directed the station spacing for the ground geophysical surveys. The resistivity and seismic surveys were able to provide a basis for interpolating between holes and model a profile of bedrock depth that is relatively unaffected by smaller irregularities (Figure 2). Airborne Geophysical Survey Area CTA Source Area ETA Profile Line Fence CTA Figure 1: Map of Neosho and Camp Crowder, Missouri. Inset box is airborne geophysical survey area. Blow up area is ETA/CTA area only, with surface geophysical survey lines and drill sites. Figure 2: Surface geophysical survey results along profile 1 (as shown in Figure 1). Drilling results, seismic refractor, photo-geologic lineaments and various man-made artifacts are shown over resistivity cross-section. The information on the depth and conductivity profiles from the ground surveys were used to determine the necessary parameters for an airborne electromagnetic survey on a regional scale. This was flown by Fugro Airborne Surveys with their five-frequency coplanar coil system with

supplementary Cs magnetometer. In addition, photo-geologic analysis was conducted to map surface lineaments on a regional scale. Multi-frequency inversion of the airborne data was performed by ORNL and correlated with the surface geophysics and well logs. Matching the change in conductivity to the bedrock interface produced a regional map of bedrock topography and residuum thickness. Potential pathways were traced from the ETA source area outward in several directions (Figure 3). Follow-on ground surveys and drilling have verified the depth estimates from the airborne data and presence of new pools of DNAPLs in bedrock troughs. Bedrock Topography ETA / CTA 500 meters Figure 3: Bedrock topography map from airborne electromagnetic survey. Map covers area indicated as airborne survey in Figure 1. Camp Crowder boundary is shown in solid black. Dashed black line indicates airborne survey line used to correlate with the surface survey line from Figure 2. Potential contaminant pathways from the ETA site are shown as black arrows. Surface topography and photogeologic lineaments are shown in grey. Surface-based geophysical surveys were used to map the character of the overburden and underlying bedrock and provide ground truth connections between the drilling and airborne results. Seismic refraction data proved best in resolving the top of the competent bedrock (below the weathering layer), whereas the resistivity data imaged the top of the weathered horizon (transition from low-tohigh resistivity) and coarser grained intervals within the overburden. In many instances, lineaments interpreted from aerial photographs coincide with disruptions observed in the ground-based geophysics. Interpretation of the surface geophysical data suggests that a mantle of friable, heavily

fractured, and/or weathered rock overlies the competent bedrock and may act as a zone for contaminant storage, and for migration over short distances. Airborne multi-frequency electromagnetic mapping provided a regional view of the site. Conductivity inversion of the data correlated well with the surface geophysical data and indicated that the mantle of friable material extended farther than originally anticipated. Derived bedrock topography indicates that the contaminant source area is situated on a transition zone between deep and shallow residuum, with paths and pools leading in several directions. Fort Detrick A similar approach was proposed for Fort Detrick. Ground geophysical surveys were followed by photo-geologic analysis and an airborne geophysical survey in order to tie results together on a regional scale. The site was much smaller and crowded by residential neighborhoods (Figure 4). Only about 200ac in Block B were amenable to flyover with the towed electromagnetic system. The depth to bedrock was shallower than at Camp Crowder, requiring a higher frequency electromagnetic system provided to ORNL by the USGS. A low altitude magnetometer survey was also flown to take fullest advantage of the helicopter mobilization and covered portions of Block A in addition to Block B. Block B featured an open field with a road on the south side and a landfill on the north side. The electromagnetic results showed the landfill as a conductive high, and a low conductivity area that was potentially related to a nearby depression (Figure 5). The magnetometer results, however, clearly showed a surprising network of underground pipes (Figure 5) belonging to an abandoned and apparently forgotten air sampling system. The center of this network correlated exactly with the center of the conductivity low seen in the electromagnetic data, indicating that the network was sufficiently well connected to distribute the transmitter power over a considerable distance. Block A Block B Figure 4: Aerial photograph of Fort Detrick, Maryland with base boundaries outlined in green.

Landfill Air Sampling System? Depression-related? 300 m 300 m Figure 5: Apparent conductivity (left) from 15kHz airborne electromagnetic survey, and magnetic analytic signal (right) from low altitude magnetometer survey. The center of the air sampling system corresponds to the center of the conductivity low. Photo-geologic lineaments are superimposed in grey, interpreted depressions and sinkholes in white. Conclusions The integrated approach to regional or large scale investigations has proven extremely effective. A survey sequence that transitions from well logging to surface to airborne surveys and back down in reverse order allows large areas to be cost-effectively covered with complete tie in between the various techniques. Each stage of the project provides new information that is critical to the success of the next stage either as ground truth and calibration on the way up, or as direction towards new targets on the way back down. The integrated approach also includes the use of potentially redundant techniques where financially practical. In these projects the magnetometer survey was included as a low-cost addition. At Camp Crowder nothing unusual was found, but at Camp Detrick the magnetometer data had a significant impact on the interpretation of the airborne electromagnetic data, as well as years of previous ground data. In areas with a long history of cultural activity, a wide suite of reconnaissance techniques should be employed to verify the background conditions. Acknowledgements These projects were funded through the U.S. Army Environmental Center at Aberdeen Proving Ground in Maryland. Many thanks to Randy Wilkinson at Camp Crowder, Doug Mayles at Fort Detrick, Drew Clemens at the New England Army Corps of Engineers, Glenn Frano at the Army Topographic Engineering Center, Mike Thompson and Steve Miller at Argonne National Laboratory, Vic Labson at USGS, Greg Hodges at Fugro Airborne Surveys, and Scott Holladay at Geosensors for their contributions of geology, data collection and analysis, and survey support. Oak Ridge National Laboratory is managed by UT-Battelle, LLC for the U. S. Department of Energy under contract DE- AC05-00OR22725. The submitted manuscript has been authored by a contractor of the U. S. Government. Accordingly, the U.S. Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free license to publish or reproduce the published form of this contribution, or allow others to do so for U. S. Government purposes.