Curved Steel I-girder Bridge LFD Guide Specifications (with 2003 Edition) C. C. Fu, Ph.D., P.E. The BEST Center University of Maryland October 2003

Similar documents
APPENDIX D SUMMARY OF EXISTING SIMPLIFIED METHODS

APPENDIX D COMPARISON OF CURVED STEEL I-GIRDER BRIDGE DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS

Karbala University College of Engineering Department of Civil Eng. Lecturer: Dr. Jawad T. Abodi

General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD

***All blue fields with double frames are used for input.*** by DesignSpreadsheets.com

AASHTO-LRFD LIVE LOAD DISTRIBUTION SPECIFICATIONS

Accordingly, the nominal section strength [resistance] for initiation of yielding is calculated by using Equation C-C3.1.

Appendix J. Example of Proposed Changes

PLATE GIRDERS II. Load. Web plate Welds A Longitudinal elevation. Fig. 1 A typical Plate Girder

Roadway Grade = m, amsl HWM = Roadway grade dictates elevation of superstructure and not minimum free board requirement.

Appendix K Design Examples

Karbala University College of Engineering Department of Civil Eng. Lecturer: Dr. Jawad T. Abodi

A.2 AASHTO Type IV, LRFD Specifications

ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures. III. Compression Members

MODULE C: COMPRESSION MEMBERS

Serviceability Deflection calculation

Mechanics of Materials Primer

Compression Members. ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures. III. Compression Members. Introduction. Compression Members (cont.)

TORSION INCLUDING WARPING OF OPEN SECTIONS (I, C, Z, T AND L SHAPES)

RESEARCH ON HORIZONTALLY CURVED STEEL BOX GIRDERS

Design of a Balanced-Cantilever Bridge

Seismic Pushover Analysis Using AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design

Failure in Flexure. Introduction to Steel Design, Tensile Steel Members Modes of Failure & Effective Areas

Design of Steel Structures Prof. Damodar Maity Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati

DEFLECTION CALCULATIONS (from Nilson and Nawy)

BEHAVIOR AND ANALYSIS OF A HORIZONTALLY CURVED AND SKEWED I-GIRDER BRIDGE. A Thesis Presented to The Academic Faculty. Cagri Ozgur

FHWA Bridge Design Guidance No. 1 Revision Date: July 21, Load Rating Evaluation of Gusset Plates in Truss Bridges

research report Design Example for Analytical Modeling of a Curtainwall and Considering the Effects of Bridging (All-Steel Design Approach)

Singly Symmetric Combination Section Crane Girder Design Aids. Patrick C. Johnson

Designer Supplement GSD-1-19 Intermediate Crossframes and Intermediate Diaphragms January 18, 2019

Longitudinal strength standard

APPENDIX A Thickness of Base Metal

This procedure covers the determination of the moment of inertia about the neutral axis.

AISC LRFD Beam Design in the RAM Structural System

Submitted to the Highway Research Board for. Publication in, the lfhighway Research Record!! CONTRIBUTION OF LONGITUDINAL STIFFENERS OF PLATE GIRDERS

CONNECTION DESIGN. Connections must be designed at the strength limit state

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach

Load Capacity Evaluation of Pennsylvania s Single Span T-Beam Bridges

Bridge deck modelling and design process for bridges

SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE DESIGN

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach

of I Section Members

Design of AAC wall panel according to EN 12602

FLEXIBILITY METHOD FOR INDETERMINATE FRAMES

Chapter 8: Bending and Shear Stresses in Beams

4.3 Moment Magnification

Direct Strength Method for Steel Deck

PIER MOMENT-ROTATION OF COMPACT AND NONCOMPACT HPS70W I-GIRDERS

Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II)

Preferred practice on semi-integral abutment layout falls in the following order:

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar

SUMMARY FOR COMPRESSION MEMBERS. Determine the factored design loads (AISC/LRFD Specification A4).

Design of Beams (Unit - 8)

ERRATA for PE Civil Structural Practice Exam ISBN Copyright 2014 (July 2016 Second Printing) Errata posted

2/23/ WIND PRESSURE FORMULA 2. PERCENT OF ALLOWABLE STRESS 3. FATIGUE DESIGN

ε t increases from the compressioncontrolled Figure 9.15: Adjusted interaction diagram

BPSC Main Exam 2019 ASSISTANT ENGINEER. Test 11. CIVIL ENGINEERING Subjective Paper-I. Detailed Solutions. Detailed Solutions

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar

Beam Design and Deflections

Steel Box Girder Bridges Design Guides & Methods

Where and are the factored end moments of the column and >.

For sunshades using the Zee blades wind loads are reduced by 10 psf.

3.5 Reinforced Concrete Section Properties

MAXIMUM SUPERIMPOSED UNIFORM ASD LOADS, psf SINGLE SPAN DOUBLE SPAN TRIPLE SPAN GAGE

Purpose of this Guide: To thoroughly prepare students for the exact types of problems that will be on Exam 3.

Lecture-08 Gravity Load Analysis of RC Structures

2010 NASCC / Structures Congress Orlando, Florida May 13, 2010

Composite bridge design (EN1994-2) Bridge modelling and structural analysis

Lecture-04 Design of RC Members for Shear and Torsion

3. Stability of built-up members in compression

Beam Bending Stresses and Shear Stress

Tension Members. ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures. II. Tension Members. Introduction. Introduction (cont.)

DES140: Designing for Lateral-Torsional Stability in Wood Members

Presented by: Civil Engineering Academy

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX 22/09/2016

Moment redistribution of continuous composite I-girders with high strength steel

Tuesday, February 11, Chapter 3. Load and Stress Analysis. Dr. Mohammad Suliman Abuhaiba, PE

ALUMINUM STRUCTURAL PLATE HEADWALLS AASHTO LRFD BASIS OF DESIGN

NAME: Given Formulae: Law of Cosines: Law of Sines:

Fundamentals of Structural Design Part of Steel Structures

6593 Riverdale St. San Diego, CA (619) Page of

6593 Riverdale St. San Diego, CA (619) Page of. Client: ProVent PV1807 Description: CBKD-92 ( **) Unit: ZF180

A Simply supported beam with a concentrated load at mid-span: Loading Stages

Structural Calculations For:

5. What is the moment of inertia about the x - x axis of the rectangular beam shown?

Torsional Analysis of

Sway Column Example. PCA Notes on ACI 318

SOLUTION (17.3) Known: A simply supported steel shaft is connected to an electric motor with a flexible coupling.

Flexure: Behavior and Nominal Strength of Beam Sections

Chapter (6) Geometric Design of Shallow Foundations

DEVELOPMENT AND EXPERIMENTAL TESTING OF PRESS-BRAKE- BRAKE-FORMED STEEL TUB GIRDERS FOR SHORT SPAN BRIDGE APPLICATIONS

Equivalent Uniform Moment Factor for Lateral Torsional Buckling of Steel Beams

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS CHAPTER 2. Introduction

Lecture Example. Steel Deck (info from Vulcraft Steel Roof and Floor Deck Manual)

CSiBridge. Bridge Rating

CE 562 Structural Design I Midterm No. 2 Closed Book Portion (25 / 100 pts)

The Contribution of Longitudinal Stiffeners To the Static Strength of Plate Girders

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet

The Lateral Torsional Buckling Strength of Steel I- Girders with Corrugated Webs

UNIT- I Thin plate theory, Structural Instability:

Transcription:

Curved Steel I-girder Bridge LFD Guide Specifications (with 2003 Edition) C. C. Fu, Ph.D., P.E. The BEST Center University of Maryland October 2003

Guide Specifications (1993-2002) 2.3 LOADS 2.4 LOAD COMBINATIONS AND LOAD FACTORS 2.5 DESIGN THEORY 2.6 FATIGUE 2.7 EXPANSION AND CONTRACTION 2.8 BEARINGS 2.9 DIAPHRAGMS, CROSS FRAMES, AND LATERAL BRACING 2.12 NONCOMPOSITE GIRDER DESIGN

** 2003 New Guide Specifications Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 Section 5 Section 6 Section 7 Section 8 Section 9 Section 11 Section 12 Section 13 Limit States Loads Structural Analysis Flanges with One Web Webs Shear Connectors Bearings I Girders Splices and Connections Deflections Constructibility

** 2003 New Guide Specifications Section 2 2.2 STRENGTH LIMIT STATE (same as 2002; LFD only) 2.3 FATIGUE LIMIT STATE (use modified AASHTO LRFD Art. 6.6.1 with load factor of 0.75 instead; Uncracked section is used as per Art. 9.6.1) 2.4 SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE (same as 2002; Deflection and Concrete Crack Control) 2.5 CONSTRUCTIBILITY LIMIT STATE (This limit state considers deflection, strength of steel and concrete and stability during critical stage of construction)

** 2003 New Guide Specifications Section 9 Deflection - Max. Preferable Span-to-Depth Ratio Las 50 = 25 d F - Live Load Deflections D LL+I < L/800 D LL+I+sidewalk < L/1000 y ** Effective for the full width and full length of the concrete deck

2.3 LOADS! Uplift must be investigated, without reduction for multiple lane loading and during concrete placement AASHTO 3.17 Check D + 2 (L + I) AASHTO 10.29.6 and 1.5 (D + L + I) Anchor bolts! Impact same as current AASHTO ( I = 50 / (L + 125) 0.3 AASHTO Eq. 3.1 )** ** Revised in 2003.

** 2003 New Guide Specifications Section 3! Impact Art. 3.5.6.1 I-Girders. Load Effect Girder bending moment, torsion and deflections Reactions, shear, cross frame and diaphragm actions Art. 3.5.6.2 Box Girders. Load Effect Girder bending moment, torsion and deflections Reactions, shear, cross frame and diaphragm actions Impact Factor Vehicle Lane 0.25 0.20 0.30 0.25 Impact Factor Vehicle Lane 0.35 0.30 0.40 0.35 Art. 3.5.6.3 Fatigue - 15%

2.3 LOADS (cont.)! Centrifugal Force same as current AASHTO ( C = 0.00117 S 2 D = 6.68 S 2 / R AASHTO Eq. 3.2 ) ( S = the design speed in miles/hr )! Thermal Forces do not have to be considered if temperature movements are allowed to occur (more in Article 1.6 & 1.7)! Superelevation redistribution of wheel load

2.4 LOAD COMBINATIONS AND LOAD FACTORS (A) Construction Loads (Construction Staging) 1.3 (D p + C) (B) Service Loads (Stress range values and live load deflections) D + L r (C) where L r L I CF = L + I + CF = Basic live load = Impact loads = Centrifugal force Overloads D + 5/3 L r

2.4 LOAD COMBINATIONS AND LOAD FACTORS (cont.) For all loadings less than H20 Group IA: 1.3 [D + 2.2 L r ] (Single lane) Group II: 1.3 [D + W + F + SF + B + S + T] (EQ may replace W and ICE may replace SF) Group III: 1.3 [D + L r + 0.3W + WL + F + LF] (D) Maximum Design Loads Group I: 1.3 [D + 5/3 L r ] For uplifting reaction: 1.3 [0.9D + 5/3 L r ]

2.5 DESIGN THEORY! General Analysis should be of entire structure However, primary bending moment curvature effects may be neglected if the following conditions exist: No. of Girders Limiting Central Angle 2 3 or 4 5 or more 1 Span 2 o 3 o 4 o 2 or more Spans 3 o 4 o 5 o

2.5 DESIGN THEORY! Torsion Diaphragms must be provided and designed as primary members! Nonuniform Torsion otherwise known as warping or lateral flange bending, this effect always must be taken into account! Composite Design may be used, but shear connectors must be designed using procedures that will be discussed at a later point

** 2003 New Guide Specifications Section 5 The effects of curvature may be ignored if! Girders are concentric,! Bearing lines are not skewed more then 10 degrees from radial, and! The arc span divided by the girder radius is less then 0.06 radians where the arc span, L as, shall be taken as follows: For simple spans: L as = arc length of the girder, For end of spans of continuous members: L as = 0.9 times the arc length of the girder, For interior spans of continuous members: L as = 0.8 times the arc length of the girder.

** 2003 New Guide Specifications Section 4 Simplified formula for the lateral bending moment in I- girder flanges due to curvature. Where: 6Ml M lat = 5RD 2 Eq. (4-1) M lat = lateral flange bending moment (k-ft) M = vertical bending moment (k-ft) l = unbraced length (ft) R = Girder radius (ft) D = web depth (in)

** 2003 New Guide Specifications Section 4 Methods (Art. 4.3)! Approximate Methods: V-Load method for I-girder bridges M/R Method for Box-girder bridges! Refined Methods: Finite Strip method. Finite Element method. (including gird model considering torsional warping)

Equation & Solution for Concentrated Torsion M DESCUS Alternate Solution for Torsion and Warping Differential Equations M EC ω 1 = 2 a φ φ Z Z φ = A + B cosh + C sinh + a a MZ GJ Equation & Solution for Uniform Torsion m Equation & Solution for Linear Varying Torsion m 1 a 2 φ = φ φ = A + BZ 1 φ φ = 2 a φ = A + BZ m EC ω + C cosh mz LEC ω + C cosh Z a Z a + + Dsinh Dsinh Z a Z a 2 mz 2GJ 3 mz 6GJL

DESCUS Alternate Solution for Torsion and Warping Differential Equations Fixed-Fixed End Solution for Uniform and Linear Varying Torsion m Reference: Torsion Analysis published by Bethlehem Steel

DESCUS Alternate Solution for Torsion and Warping Differential Equations Fixed-Hinged End Solution for Uniform and Linear Varying Torsion m

DESCUS Alternate Solution for Torsion and Warping Differential Equations Stresses induced by Torsion & Warping Formula 1 τ = Gt φ t Formula 2 τ ω s = ES s φ ω t Formula 3 σ ω EW φ s = ns

DESCUS Alternate Solution for Torsion and Warping Differential Equations Stresses induced by Bending Formula 4 σ b = M b I y Formula 5 τ b = VQ It

2.5 DESIGN THEORY (cont.) Overload ** (f b + f w ) overload < 0.8 F y noncomposite < 0.95 F y composite ** Modified in 2003 New Specifications Art. 9.5 Permanent Deflections as (f b ) overload < 0.95 F y Continuously braced flanges & partially braced tension flanges (f b ) overload < F cr1 = F bs ρ w ρ s < 0.95 F y Partially braced compression flange (f b,web comp. ) overload < F cr 0.9Ek = 2 D t w F y

2.6 FATIGUE Same as Straight Bridge except for the contribution of torsional stress AASHTO Standard Spec. Allowable Fatigue Stress Range (Redundant or nonredundant; stress cycles & stress category) Stress cycles Stress category AASHTO LRFD (** 2003 New Guide Specs.) Infinite fatigue life (ADTT single-lane $ 2000 Trucks/day F n = ( F) threshold Finite fatigue life (ADTT single-lane < 2000) F n = F = ( A/N ) 1/3

** 2003 New Guide Specifications Section 4 " Fatigue Load Design truck only with constant 30' between 32-kip axles. (LRFD Art. 3.6.1.4 with a load factor of 0.75) ADTT single-lane = p x ADTT where p = 1.0 for one-lane bridge = 0.85 for two-lane bridge = 0.80 for three-lane or more bridge Class of Highway ADTT/ADT Rural Interstate 0.2 Urban Interstate 0.15 Other Rural 0.15 Other Urban 0.10

** 2003 New Guide Specifications Section 4 Fatigue Limit State ( ()f) # ()F) n (LRFD Eq. 6.6.1.2.2-1) Infinite Fatigue Life (ADTT single-lane $ 2000 trucks/day) High traffic volume F n = ()F) threshold = 24 ksi for Category A 16 B 12 BN 10 C 12 CN 7 D 4.5 E 2.6 EN

** 2003 New Guide Specifications Section 4 Fatigue Limit State (cont.) Finite Fatigue Life (ADTT single-lane < 2000 trucks/day) ( 365)( 75)( )( ADTT) single lane N = n Category A ()F) TH (ksi) Fn = F = A N 1 3 1 2 n ( F ) TH A 2.5 H 10 10 24 R > 40! R < 40! B 1.2 H 10 10 16 Simple-span 1.0 2.0 BN 6.1 H 10 9 12 C 4.4 H 10 9 10 Continuous CN 4.4 H 10 9 12 (1) Interior 1.5 2.0 D 2.2 H 10 9 7 Support E 1.1 H 10 9 4.5 (2) Elsewhere 1.0 2.0 EN 3.9 H 10 8 2.6

2.7 EXPANSION AND CONTRACTION Must allow thermal movements to take place in directions radiating from fixed supports 2.8 BEARINGS! Must permit horizontal movements in directions radiating from fixed supports! Must allow angular rotation in a tangential vertical plane! Must hold down in cases of uplift

2.9 DIAPHRAGMS, CROSS FRAMES, AND LATERAL BRACING Same as current AASHTO except as follows:! Diaphragms/Crossframes shall be provided at each support and at intervals between Diaphragms/Crossframes shall extend in a single plane across full width of bridge! Diaphragms/Crossframes need not be located along skew at interior supports! Diaphragms/Crossframes should be full depth design as main structural element! Diaphragms/Crossframes/Lateral Bracing should be framed to transfer forces to flanges and webs, as necessary

2.9 DIAPHRAGMS, CROSS FRAMES, AND LATERAL BRACING (cont.) Suggested Diaphragm/Crossframe spacing Centerline Radius of Bridge (feet) Below 200 15 200 to 500 17 500 to 1000 20 Over 1000 25 2.9 (B) Lateral Bracing Max. stress of the bottom lateral wind bracing Suggested Max. Spacing (feet) ƒ b = ƒ d (DF) br ƒ d = Max. Stress in Crossframes from grid analysis ( DF) ( 016. L 10) 43 / ( SG) = SD + 25. bl L L R + 160 + 0652.

** 2003 New Guide Specifications Section 9 Intermediate cross frames should be spaced as nearly uniform as practical to ensure that the flange strength equations are appropriate. Equation (C9-1) may be used as a guide for preliminary framing. l = 5 36 r σ Rb f Eq. (C9-1) Where: l r σ R b f = cross frame spacing (ft) = desired bending stress ratio, = girder radius (ft) = flange width (in) f l f b

** 2003 New Guide Specifications Section 5 fl 0. 5F y Eq. (5-1) where: F y = specified minimum yield stress (ksi) When f b is greater than or equal to the smaller of 0.33F y or 17 ksi, then: f l f b 0.5 Eq. (5-2) The unbraced arc length, l, in feet between brace points at cross frames or diaphragms shall satisfy the following: l 25b and R /10 where: b = minimum flange width in the panel (in) R = minimum girder radius within the panel (ft) Eq. (5-3)

2.12 NONCOMPOSITE GIRDER DESIGN (B) Maximum Normal Flange Stress! Compact Sections Compression Flange Requirement: (** New: 18) Allowables: where F bs = F y (1-3 λ 2 ) b 3200 t F F y = 1 F ρ ρ cr bs B w Eq. (5-4) where λ = 1 12l π b F y E ** Revised in 2003 ** 2003 New Guide Specs use the same equation, except l/b f in all the equations to be consistent with the units used

2.12 NONCOMPOSITE GIRDER DESIGN (cont.) ρ b = 1 + b + 1 12 l 2l l 1 f b 6 f R 001. 2 ** Revised in 2003 ρ w = 095. + 18 01. 2 l R + f f w b l l 03. 12. Rbf F bs ρ b F y ** Revised in 2003 ρ ρ 10. B w Tension Flange f b < F bu = F y ** Superseded

** 2003 New Guide Specifications Section 5 " Compact Compression (Art. 5.2.1) F cr = smaller F F cr1 cr 2 = = F F bs y ρ b ρ w f l 3 (Eq. 5-4) (Eq. 5-5) F cr for Partially Braced Tension Flange is the same as F cr for compact compression. F cr for Continuously Braced Tension Flange is F y

2.12 NONCOMPOSITE GIRDER DESIGN (cont.) (B) Maximum Normal Flange Stress (cont.)! Non-Compact Sections Compression Flange Requirement: Allowables: 3200 b 4400 < F t y Fy ** Superseded f b # F by = F bs ρ w ρ s (f b + f w ) # F y where Tension Flange F bs = F y (1-3 λ 2 ) (Same definition for ρ b and ρ w ) (f b + f w ) # F by = F y ** Superseded

** 2003 New Guide Specifications Section 5 " Non-Compact Compression (Art. 5.2.2) b t f f E 1.02 ( f + ) b f l 23 Eq. (5-7) F cr = F smaller F cr cr 2 1 = Fbsρbρ = F y w f l Eq. (5-8) Eq. (5-9)

** 2003 New Guide Specifications Section 5 ρb = 1+ ρ ρ w1 w2 1 l 12l R 75b f 1 = f l 12l 1 1 f b 75b f 12l b f.95 + l 30 + 8,000 0.1 R = f l 1+ 0.6 fb 0 2 When f l f b 0 ρ w = min(ρ w1, ρ w2 ); f l f b < 0, ρ w = ρ w1 ** Revised in 2003 ** Revised in 2003 ** Revised in 2003

** 2003 New Guide Specifications Section 5 " Partially Braced Tension Flanges (Art. 5.3) F cr = smaller F F cr1 cr 2 = = F F bs y ρ b ρ w f l 3 Eq. (5-10) Eq. (5-11) " Tension Flanges and Continuously Braced Flanges (Art. 5.4) F cr = F y F cr = smaller F F cr1 cr 2 = = F F bs y ρ b ρ w f l 3

** 2003 New Guide Specifications Section 6 " Unstiffened Web (Art. 6.2) for R 700 feet for R > 700 feet D t w 100 Eq. (6-1) t D w ( R 700) 150 100 + 0.038 Eq. (6-2) Where: D = distance along the web between flanges (in) t w = web thickness (in) R = minimum girder radius in the panel (ft)

** 2003 New Guide Specifications Section 6 " Web Bending Stresses (Art. 6.2.1. 6.3.1, & 6.4.1) where: F cr 0.9Ek = 2 D t w k = bend-duckling coefficient = 7.2 (D/D c ) 2 for unstiffened webs = 9.0 (D/D c ) 2 for transversely stiffened webs D 2 ds = k = 5.17( ) for 0.4 d for longitudinally s Dc = D 2 ds k = 11.64( ) for < 0.4 stiffened webs D d D c s Eq. (6-3) D c = depth of web in compression (in) d = distance between long. stiffener and comp. flange (in) c F y

2.12 NONCOMPOSITE GIRDER DESIGN (cont.) (C) Web Design! Webs Without Stiffeners V u = C V p where V p = 0.58 F y D t for D t w < 6000, F y K for 6000, K D 7500, F t F y w y K C = 1.0 C 6000, = D t w K F y

2.12 NONCOMPOSITE GIRDER DESIGN (cont.) for D t w > 7500, F y K C = 45. 10 7 K D t w 2 F y where buckling coefficient K = 5 ** 2003 New Guide Specs use the same equation, except E is included in all the equations to be consistent with LRFD format.

** 2003 New Guide Specifications Section 6 " Transversely Stiffened Webs D/t w < 150 For R 700 feet d o = D Eq. (6-7a) For R > 700 feet [ 1.0 + 0.00154( R 700) ] D D d o = 3 Eq. (6-7b) where: R = minimum girder radius in the panel (ft)

2.12 NONCOMPOSITE GIRDER DESIGN (cont.)! Transversely Stiffened Girders V u = C V p (Calculations for C and V p are the same as for webs without stiffeners except 5! Requirements for Transverse Stiffeners I # d o t 3 J where K = 5 + J do D 2 2 D = 25. 2 X do

** 2003 New Guide Specifications Section 6 " Transverse Web Stiffeners Width-to-Thickness Ratio Requirement b t s s 0.48 E F y Eq. (6-13) Where: t s = stiffener thickness (in) b s = stiffener width (in) F y = specified minimum yield stress of stiffener (ksi)

** 2003 New Guide Specifications Section 6 Moment of Inertia Requirement I = d t 3 ts o w Eq. (6-14) where: 2 1.58 J = 2 X 0.5 Eq. (6-15) d / D J X = 1.0 for a 0.78 Eq. (6-16) X = a 0.78 4 1+ Z 1,775 Eq. (6-17) a = aspect ratio d o = D 2 Z = 0.079do 10 Eq. (6-18) Rtw d o = actual distance between transverse stiffeners (in) R = minimum girder radius in the panel (ft)

! Longitudinally Stiffened Girders Not required if One stiffener required (D/5 from the compression flange) if Two stiffeners required (D/5 from both flanges) if! Requirements for Longitudinal Stiffeners 2.12 NONCOMPOSITE GIRDER DESIGN (cont.) D t F d R d R y o o + 36 500 1 86 34 2,. D t F d R d R y o o + 73 000 1 29 22,.. D t F y 73 500,

** 2003 New Guide Specifications Section 6 " Longitudinal Web Stiffeners Moment of inertia Requirement I ls Dt 3 w ( 2 2.4a 0.13)β Eq. (6-19) where: Z β = +1 when the longitudinal stiffener is on the side 6 of the web away from the center of curvature β = Z +1 when the longitudinal stiffener is on the side 12 of the web toward the center of curvature

** 2003 New Guide Specifications Section 6 " When single transverse stiffeners are used, they preferably shall be attached to both flanges. When pairs of transverse stiffeners are used, they shall be fitted tightly to both flanges. " Transverse stiffeners used as connection plates shall be attached to the flanges by welding or bolting with adequate strength to transfer horizontal force in the cross members to the flanges. " Two longitudinal stiffeners may be used on web section where stress reversal occurs. " Longitudinal and transverse stiffeners preferably shall be attached on opposite sides of the web. " Bearing stiffeners shall be placed in pairs, bolted or welded to the girder web or diaphragm

CURVED COMPOSITE I-GIRDERS 2.13 GENERAL 2.14 EFFECTIVE FLANGE WIDTH 2.15 NONCOMPOSITE DEAD LOAD STRESSES 2.16 COMPOSITE SECTION STRESSES 2.17 SHEAR CONNECTORS

2.13 GENERAL! Girders shall be proportioned for ordinary bending and for nonuniform torsion (also called warping or lateral flange bending)! Usual moment of inertia method shall be used for bending! Any rational method shall be used for nonuniform torsion! For fatigue, perform stress analysis including bending and nonuniform torsion

2.14 EFFECTIVE FLANGE WIDTH AASHTO Standard Spec. (Art. 10.38.3;**2003 Art. 4.5.2) not to exceed: ¼ of the span length of the girder the distance center to center of girders 12 x the least thickness of the slab AASHTO LRFD (Art. 4.6.2.6) For interior beams, the least of: ¼ of the effective span length 12 x the average thickness of the slab + greater of (web thickness, ½ the width of the top flange of the girder) the average spacing of adjacent beams

2.15 NONCOMPOSITE DEAD LOAD STRESSES! (f b ) DL1 # F b determined from Art. 2.12 (B)! (f b + f w ) DL1 # F y determined from Art. 2.12 (B)! b t 4400 13. f DLI where f DL1 = (f b + f w ) DL1 ** Revised in 2003, same equations for noncomposite and composite

2.16 COMPOSITE SECTION STRESSES! Compact within Concrete f b # F y! Noncompact, compression flange braced by cross-frames or diaphragms f b # F by f b + f w # F y braced by concrete f b + (f w ) DL # F y ** Revised in 2003, same equations for noncomposite and composite

2.17 SHEAR CONNECTORS Same as current AASHTO for straight girders, except as modified by Article 1.19 (A)Fatigue (B) Ultimate Strength ** Covered in 2003 Section 7 Shear Connectors

** 2003 New Guide Specifications Section 7 - Strength N P = φ S sc u Eq. (7-1) where: φ sc =0.85 S u = strength of one shear connector according to AASHTO Article 10.38.5.1.2 (kip) P = force in slab at point of maximum positive live load moment given by Equation (7-2) (kip) P = + 2 2 P p F p Eq. (7-2)

** 2003 New Guide Specifications Section 7 where: P p F p = longitudinal force in the slab at point of maximum positive live load moment computed as the smaller of P 1p or P 2p from Equations (7-3) and (7-4) (kip) = radial force in the slab at point of maximum positive live load moment computed from Equation (7-5) (kip) P = 1 p where: A s = area of steel girder (in 2 ) A s F y Eq. (7-3) P 2 p = 0. 85 f c b d t d Eq. (7-4) where: f c = specified 28-day compressive stress of concrete (ksi) b d = effective concrete with as specified in Article 4.5.2 (in) t d = average concrete thickness (in)

** 2003 New Guide Specifications Section 7 where: L p = arc length between an end of the girder and an adjacent point of maximum positive live load moment (ft) R = minimum girder radius over the length, L p (ft) " Between M LL+ and M LL- - where: P T F T F p = P P L R P = + Eq. (7-5) Eq. (7-6) = longitudinal force in the concrete slab at point of greatest negative live load moment computed from Equation (7-7) (kip) = radial force in the concrete slab at point of greatest negative live load moment computed from Equation (7-10) (kip) p 2 2 P T F T

** 2003 New Guide Specifications Section 7 where: P n P = P + = the smaller of P 1n or P 2n (kip) P 2n T P = 1n p A = 0. 45 s f F c P y b d n t d Eq. (7-7) Eq. (7-8) Eq. (7-9) L F = n Eq. (7-10) T PT R where: L n = arc length between a point of maximum positive live load moment and an adjacent point of greatest negative live load moment (ft) R = minimum girder radius over the length, L n (ft)

** 2003 New Guide Specifications Section 7 - Fatigue 2 ( V ) ( ) 2 fat F V sr = + where: V fat = longitudinal fatigue shear range/unit length (k/in) F fat = radial fatigue shear range/unit length (k/in) F fat = wr where: A bot = area of bottom flange (in 2 ) σ flg = range of fatigue stress in the bottom flange (ksi) l = distance between brace points (ft) R = minimum girder radius within the panel (ft) w = effective length of deck (in) A bot σ flgl fat Eq. (7-11) Eq. (7-12)

where: ** 2003 New Guide Specifications Section 7 Eq. (7-13) F CR = net range of cross frame force at the top flange (kip) where: F Eq. (7-14) n = number of shear connectors in a cross section fat Z r = shear fatigue strength of an individual shear connector determined as specified in AASHTO LRFD Article 6.10.7.4.2 (kip) V sr = range of horizontal shear for fatigue from Equation (7-11) (kip) = F CR w nz p = V sr r

CURVED HYBRID GIRDERS 2.18 GENERAL 2.19 ALLOWABLE STRESSES 2.20 PLATE THICKNESS REQUIREMENTS ** not covered in 2003 new Guide Specifications

2.18 GENERAL! Pertains to hybrid I-girders having a vertical axis of symmetry through the middle-plane of the web plate

2.19 ALLOWABLE STRESSES (A) Bending-Noncomposite Girders! Allowable flange stress Equal to allowable stress from Article 2.12 multiplied by reduction factor R = 1 2 ( 1 α ) ( 3 + α ) 6+ BΨ( 3 Ψ) BΨ Ψ Ψ where F y = yield strength of compression flange B = Ψ= web area tension flange area C of tension flange depth of section

2.19 ALLOWABLE STRESSES (Cont.) ( / ) w α = α 1 + f f b t α = web yield strength tension flange yield strength f w / f b t = absolute value of (lateral flange bending stress / bending stress) for tension flange If f / f 1 α, then R = 1 w b t α

2.19 ALLOWABLE STRESSES (Cont.) (B) Bending Composite Girders! Allowable flange stress positive moment region Same as for noncomposite girder! Allowable flange stress negative moment region Same as for noncomposite girder, except α is defined as follows: T when f f w b c 2Ψ 1 = 1 Ψ, α α T when 2 Ψ 1 f w Ψ < < 1 Ψ f 1 b c α ( Ψ) 1

2.19 ALLOWABLE STRESSES (Cont.) = + α α 1 1 f f w b c Ψ Ψ where is the same as f f f f w b c w b t except that it is for the compression flange ( ) if, then R = 1 f f w b Ψ Ψ α 1 1

2.19 ALLOWABLE STRESSES (Cont.)! Shear (same as homogeneous section in Art. 2.12(C)! Fatigue V u = C V p Same as current AASHTO for straight hybrid girders

2.20 PLATE THICKNESS REQUIREMENTS! Web plate thickness requirements Same as for non-hybrid curved girders, except that f b in the formulas is replaced by f b / R! Flange plate thickness requirements Same as for non-hybrid curved girders

THE END Questions??