HISTORY OF CONSTRUCTION FOR EXISTING CCR SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT PLANT GASTON ASH POND 40 CFR (c)(1)(i) (xii)

Similar documents
HISTORY OF CONSTRUCTION FOR EXISTING CCR SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT PLANT GADSDEN ASH POND 40 CFR (c)(1)(i)-(xii)

STRUCTURAL STABILITY ASSESSMENT

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT YATES ASH POND 2 (AP-2) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

ENGINEER S CERTIFICATION OF FAULT AREA DEMONSTRATION (40 CFR )

CCR Rule Annual Inspection Report (cont.) 2

Big Rivers Electric Corporation Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR) from Electric Utilities Final Rule CCR Impoundment Liner Assessment Report

Mr. Michael Malone CPS Energy 145 Navarro Street San Antonio, Texas Project No

Sediment Trap. A temporary runoff containment area, which promotes sedimentation prior to discharge of the runoff through a stabilized spillway.

Location Restriction Demonstration

design, construction, operation, and maintenance of the BAP is consistent with recognized and generally accepted good engineering standards.

Sediment Trap. At multiple locations within the project site where sediment control is needed.

J.H. Campbell Generating Facility Pond A - Location Restriction Certification Report

CCR Surface Impoundment Location Restrictions Demonstration. MidAmerican Energy Company, Louisa Generating Station

LOCATED IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PREPARED FOR S.J.R.W.M.D. AND F.W.C.D. DECEMBER, 2003 Updated 2007 Updated May 2014 PREPARED BY

Standards for Soil Erosion and Sediment Control in New Jersey May 2012

BRANDON LAKES AVENUE PRE AND POST CONDITIONS DRAINAGE REPORT

Suitable Applications Sediment traps should be considered for use:

[1] Performance of the sediment trap depends on the type of outlet structure and the settling pond surface area.

Stone Outlet Sediment Trap

Report for Area Drainage Studies for 1320 MW (2x660 MW) THERMAL POWER PROJECT AT MIRZAPUR, U.P.

ENTERGY INDEPENDENCE PLANT EAST AND WEST RECYCLE PONDS DEMONSTRATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH EPA CCR RULE SITING CRITERIA , FAULT AREAS.

Sediment Control Practices. John Mathews Ohio Dept. of Natural Resources, Division of Soil and Water Resources

3.0 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

Rock & Aggregate Drop Inlet Protection

ENTERGY WHITE BLUFF PLANT RECYCLE POND A AND RECYCLE POND B DEMONSTRATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH EPA CCR RULE SITING CRITERIA 257.

Emergency Action Plan (EAP) Tata Pond Dam

Coal Combustion Residuals Unit Inflow Design Flood Control System Plan

HISTORY OF CONSTRUCTION W.H. Sammis Coal Plant North and South Ponds Stratton, Ohio

CASE STUDY #9 - Brushy Fork Dam, Sugar Grove, West Virginia

Chapter 5 CALIBRATION AND VERIFICATION

THE MINISTRY OF ENERGY AND ENERGY INDUSTRIES MINERALS DIVISION MINE DESIGN TEMPLATE OPERATOR NAME: OPERATOR ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: FACSIMILE:

Stage Discharge Tabulation for Only Orifice Flow

PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING DISTRICT 3-0

STREUVER FIDELCO CAPPELLI, LLC YONKERS DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PHASE 1. DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT For: PALISADES POINT

APPENDIX B DESIGN CRITERIA FOR TEMPORARY WATER QUALITY BMPS USED DURING CONSTRUCTION

KRIS wsbssm. IBHiiilll

THE NEED FOR AN ADDITIONAL SPILLWAY AT THE SANFORD DAM BOILING SPRING LAKES, NC. Presentation for The Brunswick County Commissioners April 20, 2015

Name: Mid-Year Review #2 SAR

APPENDIX B WORKSHEETS & EXHIBITS

3.0 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

3.18 GEOLOGY AND SOILS

Geosynthetics Applications and Performance Reviews Select Case Histories

1 PROJECT BACKGROUND. August 14, Alberta Transportation Central Region #401, Street Red Deer, Alberta T4N 6K8

Background. Valley fills Sites in the Area. Construction over Mine Spoil Fills

Type 1 System Sheet Flow Sandy Soils Type 2 System Concentrated Flow Clayey Soils Type 3 System [1] Supplementary Trap Dispersive Soils

WATER MANAGEMENT REPORT FOR PAGE ESTATES

Little Swan Lake. Dam Inspection & Siltation Study Prepared By: William Klingner, P.E., CFM October 28, 2018

NORTHUMBERLAND COUNTY, PA

FLOOD REPORT FOR MANITOBA. June 28, A Gale wind warning is in effect for Lake Manitoba and Lake Winnipeg

Materials. Use materials meeting the following.

Status Report on Polychlorinated Biphenyls in the Western Storm Drain University of California, Richmond Field Station Richmond, California

DESIGN OF WASTE DUMPS WITH FLOW-THROUGH ROCK DRAINS by Peter C. Lighthall, C. David Sellars, and W.D. Burton ABSTRACT

GEOPHYSICAL IMAGING TO ENHANCE ANALYSIS, DESIGN AND DRILLING OF LARGE-SCALE GEOTHERMAL SYSTEMS. Abstract

CHAPTER GEOLOGICALLY HAZARDOUS AREAS Applicability Regulations.

APPENDIX B HYDROLOGY

STORMWATER REPORT FRITO LAY SUBDIVISION NO. 3

WQ Outlet Design Single Orifice Orifice diameter = 24. Perforated riser/orifice Plate Outlet area per perforation row = 4

Pierce County Department of Planning and Land Services Development Engineering Section

APPENDIX G APPENDIX G SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM DESIGN RATIONALE

APPENDIX E GREATER SPRINGFIELD RELIABILTIY PROJECT DRAINAGE ANALYSIS FOR THE NEWGATE/PHELPS ROAD AND THE HATCHETT HILL ROAD AREAS

FOR PROJECTS INITIATED AFTER NOVEMBER 1, 2008 ITEM 716 EMBANKMENT EARTH OUTLET SEDIMENT TRAP

Rucker Pond. Background

June 9, R. D. Cook, P.Eng. Soils Engineer Special Services Western Region PUBLIC WORKS CANADA WESTERN REGION REPORT ON

Continuing Education Associated with Maintaining CPESC and CESSWI Certification

Assessment of Lake Forest Lake Sediment Trapping Efficiency and Capacity. Marlon R. Cook Groundwater Assessment Program Geological Survey of Alabama

Why Geomorphology for Fish Passage

CITY OF CAPE CORAL STORMWATER MASTER PLAN PHASE II - PART 1 BASINS 4, 10, & 14 SUB-BASIN DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS SUMMARY

R.M.HARW & ASSOCIATES LTD. GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED BRIDGE SITE. HELAVA CREEKl MILE MACKENZIE HIGHWAY E-2510 OCTOBER 16, 1973

VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY CHESTERFIELD POWER STATION LOWER ASH POND CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Highland Lake Bathymetric Survey

Attachment B to Technical Memorandum No.2. Operations Plan of Ross Valley Detention Basins

Stream Simulation: A Simple Example

TSEGI WASH 50% DESIGN REPORT

FRED BURR DAM FEASIBILITY STUDY

Woodford County Erosion Prevention Plan and Permit. Application #

Continuing Education Course #101 Drainage Design with WinTR-55

1.0 INSPECTION ANNUAL INSPECTION, JUNE 29, 2011 CARMACKS COPPER PROJECT, CARMACKS, YUKON. Dear Mr. West-Sells,

Coarse Sediment Traps

MIDDLESEX COUNTY Department of Planning and Community Development P.O. Box 427, Saluda, VA Phone: Fax:

Sediment Weirs (Instream)

B805 TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES - OPSS 805

Table 5-1 Sampling Program Summary for Milltown Ford Avenue Redevelopment Area, NJ.

Hydrogeological Assessment for Part of Lots 2 and 3, Concession 5, Township of Thurlow, County of Hastings 1.0 INTRODUCTION. 1.

Water Management and Hydrology of Northeast Shark River Slough from 1940 to 2015

Submitted to: St. Johns River Power Park New Berlin Road Jacksonville, FL 32226

LIQUEFACTION OF EARTH EMBANKMENT DAMS TWO CASE HISTORIES: (1) LIQUEFACTION OF THE EMBANKMENT SOILS, AND (2) LIQUEFACTION OF THE FOUNDATIONS SOILS

Black Gore Creek 2013 Sediment Source Monitoring and TMDL Sediment Budget

3.12 Geology and Topography Affected Environment

Swift Creek Sediment Management Action Plan (SCSMAP)

Birecik Dam & HEPP Downstream River Arrangement R. Naderer, G. Scharler Verbundplan GmbH, 5021 Salzburg, Austria

Observations on Surface Water in the Seminary Fen in Spring, Prepared 6/4/13 by Sam Wetterlin; updated 7/28/13

EAGLES NEST AND PIASA ISLANDS

3.11 Floodplains Existing Conditions

STUDY GUIDE FOR CONTENT MASTERY. Surface Water Movement

ROCK EXCAVATION (GRADING) OPSS 206 INDEX

Chutes Part 5: Rock linings

APPENDIX E. GEOMORPHOLOGICAL MONTORING REPORT Prepared by Steve Vrooman, Keystone Restoration Ecology September 2013

INITIAL INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN EXISTING CCR IMPOUNDMENTS CCR Rule Section

Low Gradient Velocity Control Short Term Steep Gradient Channel Lining Medium-Long Term Outlet Control Soil Treatment Permanent [1]

Stream Geomorphology. Leslie A. Morrissey UVM July 25, 2012

Transcription:

HISTORY OF CONSTRUCTION FOR EXISTING CCR SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT PLANT GASTON ASH POND 40 CFR 257.73(c)(1)(i) (xii) (i) Site Name and Ownership Information: Site Name: E.C. Gaston Steam Plant Site Location: Wilsonville, Alabama Site Address: 31972 Highway 25 Wilsonville, Alabama 35186 Owner: Owner Address: Alabama Power Company 600 North 18 th Street Birmingham, AL 35203 CCR Impoundment Name: NID ID: Plant Gaston Ash Pond N/A EPA s Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities Final Rule (40 C.F.R. Part 257 and Part 261), 257.73(c)(1), requires the owner or operator of an existing CCR surface impoundment to compile a history of construction. To the extent feasible, the following information is provided: (ii) CCR Unit Location Map: 33 14'02"N, 86 28'22"W See Location Map in the Appendix (iii) Purpose of CCR Impoundment: The E.C. Gaston Steam Plant is a 5 unit electric generating facility; Units 1 4 were originally coal fired units but are were recently converted to gas fired units with the ability to be coal fired, while Unit 5 remains a coal fired only. The Plant Gaston Ash Pond is designed to receive and store coal combustion residuals produced during the electric generating process at Plant Gaston, along with low volume wastes and stormwater sump flows from the plant. (iv) Watershed Description: Plant Gaston is located within both the Lower Yellowleaf Creek HUC 12 watershed which has a total area of 29,120 acres and the Hay Spring Branch HUC 12 watershed which has a total area of 27,197 acres. The ash pond unit is located entirely within the Hay Spring Branch watershed. Both the Lower Yellowleaf Creek and Hay Spring Branch watersheds are located within within the Lower Coosa HUC 8 watershed which has a drainage area of 1,255,891 acres. Only a relatively nominal portion of flow from the surrounding watershed flows into the pond. (v) Description of physical and engineering properties of CCR impoundment foundation/abutments:

The foundation soils beneath the impoundment are comprised of residuum of dolomite, limestone and shale, typically classified as highly plastic clays and silty clays. Bedded chert and chert boulders are encountered in some areas. Based on borings conducted prior to construction of the impoundment, the elevation of the top of the underlying bedrock ranges from 380 feet to 410 feet (approx.). The geologic properties of the site are characterized by carbonate rocks of the Knox Group of the Cambrian and Ordovician age. When weathered, the carbonate rocks can yield cherty residual clay or incipient karst type topography. Visible karst topography has not been noted within the ash pond. (vi) Summary of Site Preparation and Construction Activities: The Ash Pond was originally constructed in the early 1950 s. The basin was formed by excavating predetermined zones to elevations ranging from 389 ft to 418 ft, with much of the center zone having no excavation. Maximum elevations in the center zone were approximately 420 ft. Material for the embankment construction was excavated from within the ash pond area adjacent to the embankments. The dike fill material consists mainly of clay. The depth of the fill extends up to depths of approximately 50 feet at its deepest. The South Dike was constructed at an elevation of 445 ft, but has been raised as high as 449 ft in some areas. It has a maximum height of approximately 50 feet. The West Dike was constructed at an elevation of 445 ft with a maximum height of 30 ft. The North Dike was constructed at elevations up to 445 ft, with later raises bringing it to a maximum elevation of 447 ft. It has a maximum height of 25 ft. The exterior slopes are 2.5:1 on the east dike and 2:1 on the west and north dikes. The interior slopes are 2.5:1 on the east dike and 1.5:1 on the west and north dikes. Efforts to widen the dikes have included adding fill to the slopes to maintain their original geometry. In the late 1980 s, the impoundment was reconfigured to the arrangement that is currently used (see Appendix). Ash is sluiced into one of two settling ponds located at the eastern edge of the pond. When one cell fills, the sluice is diverted to the alternate cell while the filled cell is dredged. The dredged ash is conditioned and dry stacked further west in the pond. The sluice water, after leaving the settling pond, is diverted to a canal that runs along the perimeter of the pond boundary to another low energy area at the western pond edge where further settling of fines takes place. From there, the water enters another canal which leads to the discharge structure located at the Coosa River. Additional construction undertaken since the initial efforts in the 1950 s include widening of the dike, especially along the eastern edge of the pond. The widening to its current geometry was achieved by adding a layer of clay to the downstream face of the dike, and by adding fill material to the sluiced ash on the upstream side. This resulted in a dike raise of up to four feet in some areas. The area between the northeastern dike slope and the dike built to comprise the western edge of the coal pile was also filled over the years. The fill is comprised of miscellaneous soils including clays, gravelly clays and silts, and isolated boulders.

(vii) Engineering Diagram: The following drawings reflecting the construction of the Plant Gaston Ash Pond can be found in the Appendix: Typical Section South Dike Typical Section North and West Dikes Typical Section Adjacent to Coal Pile 2000 Ash Stacking Plan 2013 Ash Pond Topo (viii) Description of Instrumentation: The Plant Gaston Ash Pond has no instrumentation. (ix) Area capacity curves: Cumulative Volume in Acre Feet 600 80.0 500 400 300 200 100 Plant Gaston Ash Pond Area Capacity Curve 0 0.0 430 432 434 436 438 440 442 444 446 Elevation of Pond in Feet (NAVD) 70.0 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 Surface Area in Acres Acre Feet Acres (x) Spillway/Diversion design features and capacity calculations: Sluiced flows enter the ash pond, along with plant stormwater runoff and low volume wastes, and rain water that falls directly on the pond. There is also a limited amount of run on from adjoining watershed areas that enters the pond near the southwest corner. Rainfall runoff collects in a stormwater settling pond at the northwest corner of the impoundment, while the sluiced flows enter into one of two ash containment areas. These ponds are utilized alternately while dredging operations are performed on the cell not in use. Water then is routed from the stormwater pond and the ash containment areas through a series of canals until it reaches a decant area at the southwestern end of the ash pond. Water is then released into another

long canal until it reaches the main outlet structure. The outlet structure consists of an approximately 8 foot riser with an invert elevation of approximately 409 ft. The riser connects to the 36 in spillway pipe that discharges from the ash pond. The ash pond has present water capacity of about 22,036,000 cubic feet above the normal operating level, based on the 2013 topographical survey. The design storm for the Plant Gaston Ash Pond is the PMP. The rainwater volume during a PMP/24 hour design rainfall event is 1,384 acre ft. The excess water capacity remaining after a 100 year/24 hour event is 104 acre ft. The normal pool at the outlet is approximately Elev. 432 ft. After a PMP/24 hour event, water will overtop the embankment elevation of 444 ft. At the overtopping elevation of EL 444 ft, the spillway is capable of discharging 173 cfs. (xi) Provisions for surveillance, maintenance and repair: Inspections of dams and dikes are critical components and are conducted on a regular basis at least annually by professional dam safety engineers and at a minimum interval of every seven days by qualified persons at the plant. In addition, inspections are performed after unusual events such as storms. The inspections provide assurance that structures are sound and that action is taken, as needed, based on the findings. Safety inspections include numerous checklist items. Specific items vary from site to site but may include observations of such things as pond levels, weather conditions, rainfall since the prior inspection, conditions of slopes and drains, erosion, animal damage, ant hills, alignment of retaining structures and more. Dam safety engineers inspect any maintenance or remediation performed since the previous inspection, check the status of work recommended at prior inspections, ensure that the posting of emergency notification information is up to date and evaluate any items noted during plant personnel inspections. Construction specifications: Design cross sections are presented in the Appendix. (xii) Known record of structural instability: There are no known instances of structural instability at the CCR unit.

Appendix

Typical Section South Dike Typical Section North and West Dikes Typical Section Adjacent to Coal Pile

Alabama Power Company