Table of Contents DBCP Buoy Monitoring Statistics... 1

Similar documents
REGIONAL SPECIALIZED METEOROLOGICAL CENTRE (RSMC), EXETER, VOS MONITORING REPORT. (Submitted by Colin Parrett (United Kingdom), RSMC, Exeter)

REGIONAL SPECIALISED METEOROLOGICAL CENTRE (RSMC), EXETER, VOS MONITORING REPORT. (Submitted by Colin Parrett (United Kingdom), RSMC Exeter)

DBCP GTS STATUS AND HIGHLIGHTS (2010)

INTRODUCTION OF THE RECURSIVE FILTER FUNCTION IN MSG MPEF ENVIRONMENT

Australian National Report to DBCP. DBCP October, 2014 Weihai, China

Study for utilizing high wind speed data in the JMA s Global NWP system

How DBCP Data Contributes to Ocean Forecasting at the UK Met Office

Global NWP Index documentation

Data Short description Parameters to be used for analysis SYNOP. Surface observations by ships, oil rigs and moored buoys

Operational Use of Scatterometer Winds at JMA

HIGH SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL RESOLUTION ATMOSPHERIC MOTION VECTORS GENERATION, ERROR CHARACTERIZATION AND ASSIMILATION

ACCOUNTING FOR THE SITUATION-DEPENDENCE OF THE AMV OBSERVATION ERROR IN THE ECMWF SYSTEM

HR-DDS and Pilot Wave Forecast Verification Scheme Extension. Interactive on-demand analysis David Poulter, National Oceanography Centre

Feature-tracked 3D Winds from Satellite Sounders: Derivation and Impact in Global Models

USE OF SURFACE MESONET DATA IN THE NCEP REGIONAL GSI SYSTEM

Impact of METOP ASCAT Ocean Surface Winds in the NCEP GDAS/GFS and NRL NAVDAS

IMPROVEMENTS IN FORECASTS AT THE MET OFFICE THROUGH REDUCED WEIGHTS FOR SATELLITE WINDS. P. Butterworth, S. English, F. Hilton and K.

A description of these quick prepbufrobs_assim text files is given below.

Towards a better use of AMSU over land at ECMWF

OBSERVING SYSTEM EXPERIMENTS ON ATOVS ORBIT CONSTELLATIONS

Evaluating the impact on NWP of sea level atmospheric pressure data over the ocean from drifting boys

Bias correction of satellite data at Météo-France

SATELLITE DATA IMPACT STUDIES AT ECMWF

USE, QUALITY CONTROL AND MONITORING OF SATELLITE WINDS AT UKMO. Pauline Butterworth. Meteorological Office, London Rd, Bracknell RG12 2SZ, UK ABSTRACT

Wave-DDS and Pilot Wave Forecast Verification Scheme Extension

OCEAN & SEA ICE SAF CDOP2. OSI-SAF Metop-A IASI Sea Surface Temperature L2P (OSI-208) Validation report. Version 1.4 April 2015

Assimilating only surface pressure observations in 3D and 4DVAR

Status and Plans of using the scatterometer winds in JMA's Data Assimilation and Forecast System

The Impact of Observational data on Numerical Weather Prediction. Hirokatsu Onoda Numerical Prediction Division, JMA

NUMERICAL EXPERIMENTS USING CLOUD MOTION WINDS AT ECMWF GRAEME KELLY. ECMWF, Shinfield Park, Reading ABSTRACT

Rosemary Munro*, Graeme Kelly, Michael Rohn* and Roger Saunders

June Current Situation and Outlook

Numerical Weather prediction at the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts

Extending the use of surface-sensitive microwave channels in the ECMWF system

ESURFMAR Report to DBCP

NEW OSI SAF SST GEOSTATIONARY CHAIN VALIDATION RESULTS

Masahiro Kazumori, Takashi Kadowaki Numerical Prediction Division Japan Meteorological Agency

Satellite-Derived Winds in the U.S. Navy s Global NWP System: Usage and Data Impacts in the Tropics

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2018

Scatterometer Wind Assimilation at the Met Office

REPORT ABOUT ENVISAT SCIAMACHY NRT OZONE PRODUCT (SCI RV 2P) FOR JULY August 11, 2005

V. Krishna Kumar*, Bradley Ballish and Jeffrey Stoudt NCEP Central Operations, Camp Springs, MD

Active Sensor Data Assimilation using GSI

IMPACT OF GROUND-BASED GPS PRECIPITABLE WATER VAPOR AND COSMIC GPS REFRACTIVITY PROFILE ON HURRICANE DEAN FORECAST. (a) (b) (c)

The benefits and developments in ensemble wind forecasting

Accounting for non-gaussian observation error

Annex 1 to Recommendation 9 (JCOMM-III)

STATUS AND DEVELOPMENT OF SATELLITE WIND MONITORING BY THE NWP SAF

REAL-TIME MONITORING CENTRE (RTMC) FOR THE VOSCLIM DATA. (Submitted by Colin Parrett (United Kingdom), RTMC) Summary and purpose of the document

WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM THE NWP SAF ATMOSPHERIC MOTION VECTOR MONITORING?

Assimilation Experiments of One-dimensional Variational Analyses with GPS/MET Refractivity

APPENDIX A. Report of the RNODC for Drifting Buoys Integrated Science Data Management (ISDM) (August 2008 to July 2009)

CHAPTER 27 AN EVALUATION OF TWO WAVE FORECAST MODELS FOR THE SOUTH AFRICAN REGION. by M. Rossouw 1, D. Phelp 1

JMA Contribution to SWFDDP in RAV. (Submitted by Yuki Honda and Masayuki Kyouda, Japan Meteorological Agency) Summary and purpose of document

Snow Analysis for Numerical Weather prediction at ECMWF

Quarterly numerical weather prediction model performance summaries April to June 2010 and July to September 2010

Extended-range/Monthly Predictions. WGSIP, Trieste

ASSIMILATION OF CLOUDY AMSU-A MICROWAVE RADIANCES IN 4D-VAR 1. Stephen English, Una O Keeffe and Martin Sharpe

Recent Developments of JMA Operational NWP Systems and WGNE Intercomparison of Tropical Cyclone Track Forecast

EFFECTIVE ATMOSPHERIC ANGULAR MOMENTUM FUNCTIONS AND RELATED PARAMETERS COMPUTED AT THE U.S. NATIONAL METEOROLOGICAL CENTER AAM(AER) 87 * Ol

Assimilation of IASI data at the Met Office. Fiona Hilton Nigel Atkinson ITSC-XVI, Angra dos Reis, Brazil 07/05/08

Generation and Initial Evaluation of a 27-Year Satellite-Derived Wind Data Set for the Polar Regions NNX09AJ39G. Final Report Ending November 2011

AMVs in the ECMWF system:

Numerical Weather Prediction: Data assimilation. Steven Cavallo

Introduction to TIGGE and GIFS. Richard Swinbank, with thanks to members of GIFS-TIGGE WG & THORPEX IPO

OPAG on Integrated Observing Systems. Workshop to Improve the Usefulness of Operational Radiosonde Data. (Submitted by the Secretariat)

EL NIÑO/LA NIÑA UPDATE

London Heathrow Field Site Metadata

Recent Data Assimilation Activities at Environment Canada

ABSTRACT 3 RADIAL VELOCITY ASSIMILATION IN BJRUC 3.1 ASSIMILATION STRATEGY OF RADIAL

BUFR format in a nutshell

Upgraded usage of MODIS-derived polar winds in the JMA operational global 4D-Var assimilation system

Assimilation of the IASI data in the HARMONIE data assimilation system

EL NIÑO/LA NIÑA UPDATE

Global reanalysis: Some lessons learned and future plans

Assimilation of SST data in the FOAM ocean forecasting system

Does the ATOVS RARS Network Matter for Global NWP? Brett Candy, Nigel Atkinson & Stephen English

Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute

Forecast and analysis sensitivity to in situ observations

OSSE to infer the impact of Arctic AMVs extracted from highly elliptical orbit imagery

Bias correction of satellite data at the Met Office

Aurora Australis Data Quality Control Report Cruises: SR_03_/02 SR_03_/03 S 04_/04 SR_03_/05. Daniel M. Gilmore and Shawn Smith

EL NIÑO/LA NIÑA UPDATE

Climate Outlook and Review

Workshop on Numerical Weather Models for Space Geodesy Positioning

Feature-tracked 3D Winds from Satellite Sounders: Derivation and Impact in Global Models

Verification statistics and evaluations of ECMWF forecasts in

Improved analyses and forecasts with AIRS retrievals using the Local Ensemble Transform Kalman Filter

Stability in SeaWinds Quality Control

Earth Networks ENcast 6- Day Hourly Lat- Lon Forecast Feed

Satellite data assimilation for Numerical Weather Prediction II

NEW APPROACH FOR HEIGHT ASSIGNMENT AND STRINGENT QUALITY CONTROL TESTS FOR INSAT DERIVED CLOUD MOTION VECTORS. P. N. Khanna, S.

EL NIÑO/LA NIÑA UPDATE

IMPACT OF IASI DATA ON FORECASTING POLAR LOWS

Use of ATOVS raw radiances in the operational assimilation system at Météo-France

UPDATES IN THE ASSIMILATION OF GEOSTATIONARY RADIANCES AT ECMWF

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2012

SCOTIA WEATHER SERVICES INC.

Bias Correction of Satellite Data in GRAPES-VAR

An overview of the assimilation of AIRS and IASI Radiances at operational NWP Centres

Transcription:

DBCP Buoy Monitoring Statistics Table of Contents DBCP Buoy Monitoring Statistics... 1 Introduction... 1 Standard format for the buoy monitoring statistics:... 4 Distribution of the statistics:... 4 Standard format for the buoy monitoring statistics:... 6 Format of the statistics:... 6 Specific settings and tests for the statistics produced by the different centres... 9 ECMWF... 9 UKMO... 10 NCEP... 10 CMM... 11 SAWB.... 11 Introduction Buoy monitoring statistics are produced (or have been produced) monthly by following monitoring centres: 1. CMM: Centre de Météorologie Marine of Météo France, Brest, France; 2. NCO: NOAA National Center for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Central Operations, Suitland, Maryland, USA; 3. UKMO: United Kingdom Meteorological Office, Bracknell, UK; 4. ECMWF: European Center for Medium Range Weather Forecasts, Reading, UK. 5. SAWB: South African Weather Bureau, Pretoria. 6. BOM: Australian Bureau Of Meteorology Buoy data for a number of geo-physical variables (e.g. Air Pressure) collected from the Global Telecommunication System (GTS) are compared with the first guess fields (i.e. 6 hour forecast) or analysis fields of the main global model of each centre. Normally all statistics are computed excluding the gross errors. Gross errors are defined as observations departing from 1 DBCP Monitoring Statistic Description JCOMMOPS 2009

the background field (i.e. first guess field) by more than a constant value (e.g. 15 hpa for air pressure). Comparison of observed data with model first guess field is being considered at the monitoring centres as an excellent method for estimating the quality of the observations. The figure below shows difference observation minus first guess of Météo France model for air pressure for buoy 44762 in April 1998. Bias of about -3 hpa appears on the graph: Example of QC Plot for a mooring (Sea Surface Temperature compared to various models) 2 DBCP Monitoring Statistic Description JCOMMOPS 2009

http://www.meteo.shom.fr/cgi-bin/meteo/dataplot_surfmar.cgi?wmo=13009&type=0&sns=sst Example of a QC plot for a drifter. Air pressure compared to two models. http://www.meteo.shom.fr/cgi-bin/meteo/dataplot_surfmar.cgi?wmo=15906+&type=0&sns=ap Buoy monitoring statistics produced by Météo France for this buoy give following figures for April 1998 which confirm (standard deviation is small) a bias between -2.5 and -3 hpa: GTS source # Obs. Bias SD RMS BGSF 23-2.5 0.5 2.5 ENMI 160-2.9 0.9 3.0 LFPW 43-2.6 0.7 2.7 For example, distribution of (Observation - First guess) is nearly Gaussian for the vast majority of the marine observations.as shown on the example above, the few buoys reporting bad (large SD) or biased (large bias, small SD) data will easily be detected that way.there are ocean area like in the southern hemisphere where the first guess field is not as good as 3 DBCP Monitoring Statistic Description JCOMMOPS 2009

expected and where higher values of RMS might be due to the model itself, not to the observations. This is due in part to the lack of observed data in those area. Monitoring centres take this into consideration and use higher limits for RMS in those area for alerting user community on problems with buoys.problems are reported through the DBCP QC Guidelines. Since analysis is not independent from the observations, comparison of observed data with the first guess field is preferably chosen. There are however cases where first guess field is not available (e.g. SST) while analysis is available. In that case, comparison with the analysis can be useful to estimate the quality of the data although other tools would have to be used to go further (e.g. comparison with other nearby observations). Not all observations received at each centre are used and inserted into the model. Since models and data assimilation schemes are different, buoy monitoring statistics are not consistent among the different centres. Time windows, cut off times, and real time quality control procedures (e.g. black listing) leads to certain data being rejected by a model and are not therefore included in the statistics. For example, number of observations accepted by the model may vary widely from one model to the other. Standardization effort has been undertaken to harmonize the statistics but certain differences will always remain. Hence although standard proposed below is followed by all centres as far as format is concerned it is not necessarily followed as far as algorithms, gross errors, etc. are concerned. Standard format for the buoy monitoring statistics: Distribution of the statistics: Statistics are produced monthly by the four centres and distributed onto an Internet mailing list. To register on the mailing list, and receive the buoy monitoring statistics automatically, send a message containing "SUBSCRIBE dbcp-qc" (or "UNSUBSCRIBE dbcp-qc" ) in the subject of the message to the address sympa sympa.cls.fr. Statistics are also archived by Méteo France and made available via the web: ftp://esurfmar.meteo.fr/pub/pb/qc-stats/ (replaces ftp://ftp.shom.fr/pub/meteo/qc-stats) : To download monthly files http://wo.jcommops.org/cgibin/webobjects/jcommops.woa/wa/statsseries?prog=dbcp: Query form to access statistics for one or more buoys http://wo.jcommops.org/cgibin/webobjects/jcommops.woa/wa/histogram?prog=dbcp: Produce a chart of Monitoring Stats http://www.shom.fr/meteo/rechstat: Simple query form to access statistics for an individual buoy 4 DBCP Monitoring Statistic Description JCOMMOPS 2009

Through the mailing list, subject line for buoy monitoring statistics is standardized as follow: STAT center ppp year mm dd STAT is constant, i.e. the four letters "STAT" color="#008000">center: Name of the center producing the statistics, e.g. ECMWF: European Center for Medium Range Weather Forecasts NCO: NOAA NCEP Central Operations CMM: Meteo France, Centre de Meteorologie Marine UKMO: United Kingdom Meteorological Office SAWB: South African Weather Bureau SMN: Servicio Meteorológico Nacional, Argentina BOM: Bureau Of Meteorology, Australia ppp: Type of physical variable concerned or ALL if many variables are included: AP: Air Pressure (coded as 'AP ') AT: Air Temperature (coded as 'AT ') SST: Sea Surface Temperature WD: Wind Direction (codes as 'WD ') WS: Wind Speed (coded as 'WS ') WV: Wind vector (i.e. u and v components) APT: Air Pressure Tendency POS: Position of the buoy TZ: Subsurface temperatures (coded as 'TZ '): The depths of the probes and proposed actions should be placed in the body text, not in the subject line (not enough room) ALL: All buoy sensors (e.g. remove all buoy data from GTS) year:year concerned (e.g. 1998) mm: Month concerned (e.g. 04 for April) dd: Last day of the 1-month period concerned. It is optional and used only if the 1- month period does not end on the last day of the month. For example dd=15 if the 1- month period concerned is 16 July to 15 August. Example: From Date Subject dbcp-qc jcommops.org 02-May-1998 STAT CMM ALL 1998 04 The April 1998 monitoring statistics for many geo-physical variable and produced by the Centre de Meteorologie Marine of Meteo France are available in the body text. 5 DBCP Monitoring Statistic Description JCOMMOPS 2009

Standard format for the buoy monitoring statistics: Format of the statistics: The monitoring statistics are available in the body text. Header part contains information upon format and gross errors used. There is one line of data per buoy per geo-physical variable. Format is fixed and fields are separated by commas ','. Missing values appear as blanks. Fields appear in the following order: Date####: Oldest date between: last day for the monthly statistics and last day of data reception on GTS for the monitored sensor (format YYYYMMDD) WMO##: WMO number of buoy or Ship's Call Sign Sns: Sensor Name : AP: Pressure AT: Air Temp SST: Sea Surf Temp WS: Wind Sp WD: Wind Dir WV: Wind vector APT: Tendency HUM: Humidity TD: Dew Point Orig: GTS Origin of the data (ALL or cccc from GTS Bulletin header) C: GTS code (B: BUOY, S:SHIP, Y:SYNOP) Cntr#: Monitoring Center producing the stats (e.g. ECMWF, UKMO, OPC, CMM) Lat##: Last Latitude of buoy/ship during the month Long##: Last Longitude of buoy/ship during the month Rcei: Total number of obs received at the center including obs not used Acpt: Total number of obs accepted by the model GE#: Number of Gross Errors (i.e. number of (Obs-Field) exceeding limits) Bias#: Mean Bias (Obs-Field) 6 DBCP Monitoring Statistic Description JCOMMOPS 2009

Special algorithm for bias of wind direction only: For buoys reporting wind direction with an offset close to 180 degrees, usual algorithm would show a very large SD and bias making it difficult to detect the error. Ideally we should have a small SD with a bias in the order of 180 degrees. This is possible by applying the following algorithm presently used by CMM: 1) (Obs-FG) 2) ([Obs-90]-FG) Compute the 4 series modulo 360 (i.e. result should fit in range -180.. +180) of SD and bias for 3) ([Obs+90]-FG), and 4) ([Obs+180]-FG) In each series, remove gross errors, e.g. values of [Obs-180]-FG >= GE limit: if there is a 180 degrees bias then [Obs-180]-FG will probably fit within the limits. Then pick the smallest SD of the 4 series as the actual SD, and take (bias-i) as the actual bias if series ([obs+i]-fg) was picked as the one with the smallest SD. SD##: Standard Deviation, SD = RMS (Obs-Field-Bias); Computation of SD for wind vectors only: By convention a special algorithm is applied: SD=RMS(WS/Rate - Field). Remark: As an exception, it is understood that values of SD and Rate given for Wind Vectors are actually computed based upon Wind Speed, not Wind Vector. RMS#: Root Mean Square, RMS = RMS (Obs-Field); For Wind Vectors (WV), by convention, RMS=RMS(SQRT(Vec(WV-Field)**2)) Rate: Mean (Obs/Field) Computation of Rate for wind vector and only for wind vector: Mean(Obs./Field). Remark: As an exception, it is understood that values of SD and Rate given for Wind Vectors are actually computed based upon Wind Speed, not Wind Vector. F: Flag for Field used : A=Analysis, G=First Guess, B=Both Example: Date####,WMO##,Sns,Orig,C,Cntr#,Lat##,Long##,Rcei,Acpt,GE#,Bias#,SD##,RMS#,Rate,F 7 DBCP Monitoring Statistic Description JCOMMOPS 2009

19980430,12511, AP,KARS,B, CMM, 27.7, 35.5, 657,, 0, -2.6, 1.0, 2.8,,B 19980430,12511, AT,KARS,B, CMM, 27.7, 35.5, 620,, 0, 2.4, 3.2, 4.0,,B 19980414,12511,SST,KARS,B, CMM, 27.7, 35.5, 228,, 56, 1.5, 2.1, 2.6,,B 19980409,12512, AP,KARS,B, CMM, 24.1, 35.5, 271,, 0, 0.8, 0.8, 1.2,,B 19980409,12512, AT,KARS,B, CMM, 24.1, 35.5, 271,, 0, -1.7, 2.7, 3.2,,B< 8 DBCP Monitoring Statistic Description JCOMMOPS 2009

Specific settings and tests for the statistics produced by the different centres UKMO CMM ECMWF NCO SAWB BOM Suggested AP 15hPa 10hPa 15hPa 15hPa 15hPa 15 hpa 15hPa AT 15C 15C 10C 15C / / 15C WS 15m/s vect. 15m/s 15m/s 15 m/s / 15 m/s 15 m/s WD 100 Deg 100 Deg 100 Deg 100 Deg / 100 Deg 100Deg WV 25m/s? 25 m/s 25m/s / 25 m/s 25m/s SST / 5C / 5C / 5C 5C Table 1: Gross error limits used by the different centres: ECMWF Rcei column indicates the number of observations that are presented to the model. Observations arriving after the cut off time (unknown value) are not presented to the model. Statistics are computed based on the 4D variational data assimilation scheme. Acpt column indicates number of observations used by the model (not counting the gross errors nor observations out of time window (value unknown)). Only one observation is used for each cycle. Other observations are ignored and are not even used for computing the statistics. 4 cycles are run per day at 00UTC, 06UTC, 12UTC, and 18UTC. The statistics are computed using the feedback files generated by the data assimilation scheme. Air temperature and SST coming from Drifters are not presented to the model so the computation of such statistics is not possible. Things that might be proposed in the future for more consistency: 1. Compute specific SD algorithm for Wind Vector (WV) 2. Compute special algorithm for bias of Wind Direction (WD) 3. Indicate what is the cut off time and time windows which are used. Indicate whether those are applied to the Rcei and/or Acpt columns. 9 DBCP Monitoring Statistic Description JCOMMOPS 2009

UKMO The UKMO data assimilation system is a 3DVar scheme. It treats all observations as if valid at the analysis time. In the Incremental Analysis Update initialization scheme, the analysis increments are added gradually to the model during integration from 3 hours before until 3 hours after the analysis time. For the global model which is used for computing the buoy monitoring statistics, observations within 3 hours of the nominal analysis time are used with a cut-off of 3 hours 20 minutes. NCEP For example, for the 1200 UTC global analysis, model uses observations that are valid between 0901 and 1500 TC, and that have arrived before 1520 UTC. The global model 6-day forecast then runs. If late observations are received after 1520 UTC but before 2320 UTC then they will be used in the 'update' analysis, which is used to provide a background field for the following midnight analysis. Data assimilation scheme 'thins' frequent observations from the same buoy so that it only uses a maximum of 5 reports for a global analysis, or 3 for a limited area analysis. In the case of the global model, the reports are sorted by observation time minus analysis time (in minutes) into intervals of: o -180 to -105, -105 to -35, -35 to 35, 35 to 105 and 105 to 180. Within each bin, those observations closest to -140, -70, 0, 70 and 140 respectively are selected unless they are within 60 minutes of the previous report. The following description of GDAS assimilation scheme is as of August 1998. The Global Data Assimilation System (GDAS) runs four times a day. Table below shows the approximate start times for each cycle. Each GDAS run will use data with observation times +/- 3 hours from the "on" time of the GDAS run. Following table also shows the data time windows for each GDAS run: Run Run begins at Time window --- ------------- ----------- 0000 GDAS 0600 2100 (previous day) to 0300 0600 GDAS 0940 0300 to 0900 1200 GDAS 1950 0900 to 1500 1800 GDAS 2200 1500 to 2100 All data that are received up until the start time of each GDAS run may be used, as long as that data have observation times within the +/- 3 hour time window for that GDAS run. For example, if a report with an observation time of 1100Z is received at 1930Z, it may be used in the 1200Z run of the GDAS (which begins around 1950Z), depending on the quality of the report. In addition, all data must include a pressure observation in order to be used. If any surface marine report is missing both sea-level pressure and surface pressure, the report will not be used by the GDAS. If either sea-level pressure or surface pressure are included in an observation, that observation may be used by the GDAS. The only exception to this rule 10 DBCP Monitoring Statistic Description JCOMMOPS 2009

concerns observations from ATLAS buoys. An ATLAS buoy report that is missing a pressure observation will have the standard atmosphere value of 1013.25 mb attached to the report, so that other parameters reported by the ATLAS buoy may be used by the GDAS. The GDAS will use all reports received that have good or neutral quality marks. These quality marks may have been set by manual quality control or by an automated process. For surface marine data, the quality marks checked by the GDAS are those set on surface pressure (same as sea-level pressure for marine platforms at sea-level), air temperature, and wind. No thinning is done for multiple observations from any one platform. All observations have the same weight, no matter what their observation time is (i.e. for the 1200Z GDAS run, a 1200Z observation has no more weight than a 1000Z observation or a 1400Z observation). In order to use off-time observations, the GDAS takes forecasts valid at the "on" time and at +/- 3 hours and performs a time interpolation between the forecasts and the observation. The differences computed between the interpolated forecasts and the observation are then applied to the GDAS. For example, if a buoy report has an observation time of 1000Z, then forecasts valid at 0900Z and 1200Z would be used and interpolated in time to 1000Z. Differences would be computed between the interpolated forecast and the 1000Z buoy report, and those differences would then be applied to the 1200Z GDAS. CMM Things that might be proposed in the future for more consistency: Adding information in column Acpt for SST Things that might be proposed in the future for more consistency: CMM: CMM is not in a position of include number of accepted observations because the information is not available. CMM could however simulate data assimilation scheme of the model in order to come with close enough figures. CMM is presently studying feasibility. SAWB. No longer active Statistics excludes Gross errors; Limit for AP: 15.0 mb Numbers of observations refer to the statistics - NOT the NWP model. All statistical measures are weighted according to proximity of observation time to model reference hour; Time range is +/- 2 hours. Buoys in the window 50W to 70E ; Equator to 60S. 11 DBCP Monitoring Statistic Description JCOMMOPS 2009

SAWB uses ECMWF Analysis. The model fields used are the GRIB files HPIA98 and HPLA98 as on the GTS with some identification parameters the following: Center = 98, model/process = 190. The ECMWF Analysis is only valid for 12 UTC. Are accepted all buoy observations (Obs) in the time interval (10,00-14,00) UTC for evaluations using ECMWF. The actual position of each Obs is interpolated into the model field to obtain the model value at that point. The difference between Obs and Model value is found and saved in an unique file for each buoy. These differences are accumulated for a whole month. Obs differences are weighted according to the distance from 12 UTC in the following manner: an Obs at 12 gets a weight of 9 (=3X3) an Obs at 11 or 13 is weighted with 4 (=2x2) an Obs at 10 and 14 has a weight of 1 (=1x1) and an Obs at say 10:30 (=10.50) gets a weight [ (3-1.5)**2 = 2.25 ] rounded to 2. Gross errors are excluded from calculating statistics. After the end of a month all the accepted Obs (differences) with their weights are taken together for calculating the statistics. The formulae used are: BIAS = [SUM(Wi x Di)] / [SUM(Wi)] ; Wi = weight(i) and Di = Difference(i) RMS = SQRT{ SUM[Wi x (Di **2)] / SUM(Wi) } SD = SQRT{ 1/[SUM(Wi)-1] x SUM[Wi x (Di **2)] - [SUM(Wi)] / [SUM(Wi)-1] x [BIAS]**2 } 12 DBCP Monitoring Statistic Description JCOMMOPS 2009