Math 152: Affine Geometry

Similar documents
Chapter 12: Ruler and compass constructions

2 Homework. Dr. Franz Rothe February 21, 2015 All3181\3181_spr15h2.tex

4 Arithmetic of Segments Hilbert s Road from Geometry

Homework has to be turned in this handout. For extra space, use the back pages, or blank pages between. due January 22/23

Class IX Chapter 5 Introduction to Euclid's Geometry Maths

31.1.1Partial derivatives

October 16, Geometry, the Common Core, and Proof. John T. Baldwin, Andreas Mueller. The motivating problem. Euclidean Axioms and Diagrams

Lecture 1: Axioms and Models

1.3 Linear Dependence & span K

Lecture 16 : Definitions, theorems, proofs. MTH299 Transition to Formal Mathematics Michigan State University 1 / 8

Lecture 6: Finite Fields

EUCLIDEAN SPACES AND VECTORS

Slope Fields: Graphing Solutions Without the Solutions

Course 212: Academic Year Section 1: Metric Spaces

35 Chapter CHAPTER 4: Mathematical Proof

Midterm 1 Review. Distance = (x 1 x 0 ) 2 + (y 1 y 0 ) 2.

Projects in Geometry for High School Students

Geometry I (CM122A, 5CCM122B, 4CCM122A)

The Not-Formula Book for C1

Math 1230, Notes 2. Aug. 28, Math 1230, Notes 2 Aug. 28, / 17

THE THEOREM OF DESARGUES

4.2. ORTHOGONALITY 161

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Geometry and Topology Commons

Short Introduction to Admissible Recursion Theory

Let V be a vector space, and let X be a subset. We say X is a Basis if it is both linearly independent and a generating set.

x y B =. v u Note that the determinant of B is xu + yv = 1. Thus B is invertible, with inverse u y v x On the other hand, d BA = va + ub 2

Chapter 3. Betweenness (ordering) A system satisfying the incidence and betweenness axioms is an ordered incidence plane (p. 118).

PEANO AXIOMS FOR THE NATURAL NUMBERS AND PROOFS BY INDUCTION. The Peano axioms

Exercise 5.1: Introduction To Euclid s Geometry

1 Continuity and Limits of Functions

2 Lecture 2: Logical statements and proof by contradiction Lecture 10: More on Permutations, Group Homomorphisms 31

Circles and. The circle of radius 3 centered at (0, 0) is the set of solutions of the quadratic equation x 2 + y 2 =9.

Distance in the Plane

Fundamentals of Geometry Math 3181

Linear Algebra I. Ronald van Luijk, 2015

Lecture Notes. Advanced Discrete Structures COT S

What is proof? Lesson 1

Sums of Squares (FNS 195-S) Fall 2014

Power Round: Geometry Revisited

Linear Algebra. Preliminary Lecture Notes

Lecture 8: A Crash Course in Linear Algebra

+ 2gx + 2fy + c = 0 if S

THE INVERSE FUNCTION THEOREM

Affine Planes: An Introduction to Axiomatic Geometry

A lower bound for X is an element z F such that

Algebra I Fall 2007

2. Introduction to commutative rings (continued)

Chapter 5: The Integers

Inverses and Elementary Matrices

Honors 213 / Math 300. Second Hour Exam. Name

Chapter One. Affine Coxeter Diagrams

Theorem. For every positive integer n, the sum of the positive integers from 1 to n is n(n+1)

Carmen s Core Concepts (Math 135)

Euclid Geometry And Non-Euclid Geometry. Have you ever asked yourself why is it that if you walk to a specific place from

Linear Algebra. Preliminary Lecture Notes

Nondeterministic finite automata

Lecture 2: Vector Spaces, Metric Spaces

LINEAR ALGEBRA: THEORY. Version: August 12,

FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 26

1 Take-home exam and final exam study guide

Spectral Graph Theory Lecture 2. The Laplacian. Daniel A. Spielman September 4, x T M x. ψ i = arg min

Mathematics 3210 Spring Semester, 2005 Homework notes, part 8 April 15, 2005

Metric spaces and metrizability

Chapter 1 A Survey of Divisibility 14

Geometry beyond Euclid

UNDERSTANDING RULER AND COMPASS CONSTRUCTIONS WITH FIELD THEORY

MATH10040: Chapter 0 Mathematics, Logic and Reasoning

Math 24 Spring 2012 Questions (mostly) from the Textbook

To hand in: (a) Prove that a group G is abelian (= commutative) if and only if (xy) 2 = x 2 y 2 for all x, y G.

ISOMORPHISMS KEITH CONRAD

WEEK 7 NOTES AND EXERCISES

DFA to Regular Expressions

p, p or its negation is true, and the other false

A BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO ZFC. Contents. 1. Motivation and Russel s Paradox

Math101, Sections 2 and 3, Spring 2008 Review Sheet for Exam #2:

9. Birational Maps and Blowing Up

CSE 1400 Applied Discrete Mathematics Proofs

Math 300: Foundations of Higher Mathematics Northwestern University, Lecture Notes

Neutral Geometry. October 25, c 2009 Charles Delman

MCS-236: Graph Theory Handout #A4 San Skulrattanakulchai Gustavus Adolphus College Sep 15, Methods of Proof

2.1 Definition. Let n be a positive integer. An n-dimensional vector is an ordered list of n real numbers.

BMO Round 2 Problem 3 Generalisation and Bounds

Math 164-1: Optimization Instructor: Alpár R. Mészáros

A PRIMER ON SESQUILINEAR FORMS

1 Euclidean geometry. 1.1 The metric on R n

A SIMPLE AXIOMATIZATION OF LUKASIEWICZ S MODAL LOGIC

Junior Seminar: Hyperbolic Geometry Lecture Notes

Parabolas and lines

Math Precalculus I University of Hawai i at Mānoa Spring

GALOIS THEORY : LECTURE 11

Circles in F 2 q. Jacob Haddock, Wesley Perkins, and John Pope Faculty Adviser: Dr. Jeremy Chapman

HOW TO THINK ABOUT POINTS AND VECTORS WITHOUT COORDINATES. Math 225

1 Topology Definition of a topology Basis (Base) of a topology The subspace topology & the product topology on X Y 3

Contact. Emina. Office: East Hall 1825 Phone:

Lattice Theory Lecture 4. Non-distributive lattices

Notes on multivariable calculus

After taking the square and expanding, we get x + y 2 = (x + y) (x + y) = x 2 + 2x y + y 2, inequality in analysis, we obtain.

UNIT I : NUMBER SYSTEMS

Gödel s Proof. Henrik Jeldtoft Jensen Dept. of Mathematics Imperial College. Kurt Gödel

Math (P)Review Part I:

Transcription:

Math 152: Affine Geometry Christopher Eur October 21, 2014 This document summarizes results in Bennett s Affine and Projective Geometry by more or less following and rephrasing Faculty Senate Affine Geometry by Paul Bamberg in a more mathematically conventional language (so it does not use terms senate, faculty, committee, etc. ) Figures are all taken from Bennett s book. 1 Brief Recap of Euclidean Geometry Definition 1.1 (Euclid s Five Axioms of Geometry). geometry of the plane: Euclid stated five axioms for Euclidean 1. A straight line can be drawn between any two points. 2. A line can be extended indefinitely in either direction. 3. A circle can be described with any point as center and any segment as radius. 4. All right angles are equal. 5. Through a point not on a line there exists a unique line parallel to the given line. Observation 1.2. A set of axioms describing some mathematical structure would be useless if there isn t a concrete example which satisfies the axioms. In our this case, the space R 2 satisfies all five axioms as above. The points are (x, y) R 2 and a line is L = {(x, y) R 2 ax + by = c} for some a, b, c R, and so forth. Remark 1.3. We can immediately start asking what kind of geometry F 2 for any field F should have. This is one of the motivations behind trying to axiomatize what an affine plane should be. The following two are classical theorems in Euclidean plane geometry that will turn out to be significant for our purposes later: Theorem 1.4 (Desargues). Desargues theorem comes in two parts, which can really be said in one statement. Let s denote by L(A, B) the line through points A, B. Suppose that either L(A, A ) L(B, B ) L(C, C ) or L(A, A ) L(B, B ) L(C, C ) = P. If L(A, B) L(A, B ), and L(A, C) L(A, C ), then L(B, C) L(B, C ). 1

Theorem 1.5 (Pappus). Let l, m L such that l m = O, and let P, Q, R l, S, T, U m such that l(p, T ) l(q, U) and l(q, S) l(r, T ). Then l(p, S) l(r, U). 2 The Affine Plane What we defined as the affine plane in class is really a Desarguesian and Pappus-ian affine plane. Here we define what just an affine plane is, and show that addition of points and be defined, Definition 2.1. An affine plane consists of the data (P, L ) the set of points P and the set of lines L P(P) satisfying the following axioms: 1. A, B P,!l L s.t. A, B l. We denote this line as l(a, b). 2. Given l L and A / l,!l L such that A l and l l =. We say that l, l are parallel when l l = or l = l, and we denote it as l l. 3. l 2 l L and L 2. (This eliminates uninteresting cases like: affine line and single point with many lines) With these axioms, we can already deduce some nontrivial theorems: 2

Lemma 2.2. Let (P, L ) be an affine plane. 1. For any two distinct l, l L, either l l = or l l = {P } (a single point). 2. Suppose m intersects l and l l (m l), then m intersects l. 3. is a equivalence relation on L. proof) Given in class for 1. and 2., and 3. follows from 2. Theorem 2.3. Let (P, L ) be an affine plane. Suppose l, r L. There exists a bijective map f : l r. That is, there exists a bijective correspondence between points of l and points of r. Definition 2.4. Now suppose that for some l L, l <. Then by above theorem we have that for all k L, k = n are finite and are all same. In this case, we say (P, L ) is an affine plane of order n Corollary 2.5. Let (P, L ) be an affine plane of order n. Then from Theorem 2.3 we immediately have the following: 1. l = n l L. 2. Fix A P. The number of l L such that A l is n + 1. 3. A pencil is an equivalence class of. There are n + 1 pencils each containing n lines, and thus L = n(n + 1). 4. P = n 2 Remark 2.6. Note that everything so far is direct result of the three axioms we assumed for an affine plane. We did not need notions regarding Desargues or Pappus yet. 3

3 The Desarguesian + Pappusian Affine Plane We now wish to define how to add two points on a line after fixing an origin and how to multiply two points on a line after fixing an origin and the unit point. For these operations to behave well (well-defined, commutative, etc.) we need additional structure on the affine plane so far, and those additional axioms are exactly those saying that the Desargues and Pappus theorems hold. That is, from here on, we assume that by an affine place we mean one in which Desargues and Pappus theorems are satisfied. Definition 3.1 (addition). Let A, C be points on a line l. Fix a point O l. We define adding A to C with respect to O, denoted A + C, by the following construction: 1. Take any point B / l and let m B be the unique line parallel to l. 2. Let k be a line through A parallel to the line through O, B, and let k m = D. 3. Now let n be a line through D parallel to the line through B, C. 4. Define A + C as the intersection of n and l. Proposition 3.2. The above definition is well-defined. That is, A + C (w.r.t. O) is independent of the choice of B. Proof) Draw the diagram and be convinced using Desargues (may need to use it twice) Proposition 3.3. Addition is associative. That is, given A, C, E l and a fixed O l, (A+C)+E = A + (C + E). 4

Proof) Again, draw the diagram and be convinced. Proposition 3.4. Let l L, and fix a O l so that + is defined on l. Then, A l A + O = A and A l V l s.t. A + V = O. That is, l, + is a group. Proof) Drawing the diagrams just gives the proof. Theorem 3.5 (Converse of Desargues). If L(A, B) L(A, B ), L(A, C) L(A, C ), and L(B, C) L(B, C ), then either L(A, A ) L(B, B ) L(C, C ) or L(A, A ) L(B, B ) L(C, C ) = P. Proof) Suffices to show that if two lines meet then the third one meets at the same point too. Corollary 3.6. Addition is commutative. 5

Definition 3.7 (Multiplication). Let l L and fix O l and I l (O I). Given A, C l, we define the product of A, C by the following procedure: 1. Choose a B / l. Draw, l(o, B), l(i, B), and draw a line parallel to l(i, B) through A, which intersects l(o, B) at D. 2. Draw l(b, C), and let k be the parallel line through D. 3. k l is defined as A C. Proposition 3.8. Multiplication as defined above is well-defined. Proof) Again draw the diagram, and see that we just use the Desargues twice. Proposition 3.9. Multiplication is associative. Moreover, A I = A and for A O, there exists B such that AB = I. Hence, l {O} with O, I fixed and with multiplication is a group. Proof) Let s trust Paul and believe that multiplication is associative. For the right identity and right inverse, just draw the diagrams. Theorem 3.10. Multiplication is commutative. Moreover, distributivity holds for the addition and multiplication we have defined. Hence, l becomes a field. Proof) For the sake of sanity, we only did commutativity in class, which is quite easy after drawing the diagram and citing A5. 4 Coordinatization Now, we have enough tools to put a coordinate system on a given affine space (P, L ). Construction 4.1. Given an (Desarguesian & Pappusian) affine space (P, L ), we coordinatize it as follows: 1. Fix an arbitrary point as (0, 0) := O P, and take two distinct lines x, y L (i.e. the x-axis and y-axis) that contains O. 6

2. On each line, pick a point (1, 0) x and (0, 1) y. 3. Now, for each point A P, by drawing the parallel lines to x and y going through A and looking at the intersections with x and y, we have that P x y as sets. The construction above essentially proves the following: Theorem 4.2. For any affine plane (P, L ) and axes x = l(o, I) and y = l(o, I ) in L, the points P are in one-one correspondence with the ordered pairs in x y. 7